Waters Of Greencastle, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 71.1 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to supervise and ensure the safety of a resident with dementia residing on the locked dementia unit when an exit glass door and an outside courtyard gate were left open by a contractor and the resident eloped from the facility and fell into a ditch for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident B). The immediate jeopardy began on 6/2/26 at 1:58 p.m., when Resident B was observed via video footage exiting the gate from the locked unit courtyard. She continued across the parking lot into a grassy field. She walked at a rapid pace, carrying a blanket in front of her. She walked approximately 100 yards and veered towards the road and was observed falling on her face in a ditch. She was observed trying to get up and falling again. She was on the ground for 13 minutes before a hospital staff member approached her, but she was unable to stand. He indicated she was about 2 1/2 to 3 feet from the road between the facility and the hospital. Facility staff were seen arriving to assist the resident after the hospital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) failed to communicate accurate information, complete accurate documentation, and pressured facility staff to provide false statements for an elopement from the memory care unit for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident B). This deficiency had the potential to affect 68 of 68 residents residing at the facility who were overseen by the Administrator and DON.Findings include:During an interview on 6/15/26 at 12:29 p.m., Resident B's spouse indicated he had been caring for his wife at home and was very sad he had to make the decision to place her in a safer environment due to her dementia. His wife was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He received a call from the Administrator around 3:00 p.m. on 6/2/26. She indicated Resident B had a little incident when she followed a contractor out of the memory care doors and had fallen in a grassy area. She indicated she was okay. Before going into a care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure beard restraints were worn appropriately and hand hygiene was performed after staff touched their face during 5 of 5 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 68 of 68 residents who ate meals from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During a kitchen observation, on 12/1/25 at 10:05 a.m., [NAME] 7 was observed in the food preparation area, stirring a pot on the stove and preparing other food. At the same time, [NAME] 7 was observed with a full beard and mustache. [NAME] 7 had a beard restraint in place, but it only covered a small area of the beard on his chin, leaving the mustache and sides of the face open. [NAME] 7 was wearing gloves but touched his face and nose several times with his forearm and wrist area of the glove. [NAME] 7 did not wash his hands after touching his face and nose and continued to prepare food. 2. During a lunch service observation, on 12/1/25 at 12:03 p.m., [NAME] 7 was observed serving food from the steam table in the main dining room. The beard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain consent for treatment of psychotropic medications for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 7, 8, 27, and 22). Findings include:1. On 12/3/25 at 10:25 a.m., the medical record of Resident 7 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), hypertension (high blood pressure) and depression (an illness characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest in activities that you normally enjoy, accompanied by an inability to carry out daily activities, for at least two weeks). The record did not indicate the resident had any related heart conditions. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/2/25, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the grievances expressed by the residents were addressed and resolutions were explained to the residents for 6 of 24 residents reviewed for food concerns (Residents 6, 71, 38, 24, 68, and 65). Findings include:During an interview, on 12/01/25 at 11:19 a.m., Resident 6 indicated she ate in her room. The food was often cold when she got it. The residents were not getting the food that was posted on the menus. The menu had not been right for a while. She was not sure who was ordering the food, but they frequently ran out of items. They recently had run out of coffee. During an interview, on 12/02/25 at 10:52 a.m., Resident 71 indicated he did not like the food and when he asked for an alternative, he was told they did not have any. There were times when all he wanted was peanut butter and jelly and the kitchen staff told him they did not have any peanut butter. During an interview, on 12/02/25 at 11:20 a.m., Resident 38 indicated he had to buy himself his own peanut butter, jelly, and bread so that he would have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) (a clinical tool to detect and monitor tardive dyskinesia (TD) in patients taking (antipsychotic) medications, rating involuntary facial, limb, and trunk movements) assessments were completed timely for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 7 and 22).Findings include:1. On 12/3/25 at 10:25 a.m., the medical record of Resident 7 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), hypertension (high blood pressure), and depression (an illness characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest in activities that you normally enjoy, accompanied by an inability to carry out daily activities, for at least two weeks). The record did not indicate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 17 reviewed (Residents 22 and 65).Findings include: 1. Resident 22's record was reviewed on 12/3/25 at 1:36 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, active primary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS - where disability worsens steadily over time, unlike the relapsing-remitting form, with symptoms like walking difficulty, fatigue, and cognitive issues), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive lung disease, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis, that blocks airways, making breathing difficult due to inflammation, mucus, and damaged air sacs), and bipolar disorder (a lifelong mental health condition causing extreme mood swings, from manic highs to depressive lows). Facility census information indicated Resident 22 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/23/25, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed related to weight loss (Resident 7), failed to ensure a care plan was developed related skin concerns (Resident 71), and failed to ensure documentation of care plan meeting being held (Resident 19) for 3 of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: 1. On 12/1/25 at 11:58 a.m., during initial observation observed Resident 7 in the main dining room being assisted with meal. The Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) started to assist the resident with the meal. CNA left to assist other residents. Resident continued to pick at food. Did not seem to know what to do with utensils. At 12:08 p.m., the CNA returned and assisted the resident again. The CNA began to feed the resident at that time. On 12/3/25 at 10:25 a.m., the medical record of Resident 7 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 19) observed during the medication pass. There were 32 opportunities for error observed with 4 medication errors, resulting in a medication error rate of 12.5 percent. Findings include: On 12/3/25 at 9:31 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 12 administered medications to Resident 19. The medications included, but were not limited to, fluticasone-salmeterol aerosol (medication to ease breathing) inhaler 250-50 micrograms (mcg) 1 puff and tiotropium bromide inhaler (relaxes and opens air passages) aerosol 2.5 mcg 1 puff. RN 12 handed the resident the inhalers, and he took 1 puff of each. The resident did not rinse and spit after the fluticasone propionate inhaler and was not prompted by RN 12 to do so. The inhalers were administered one after the other, with no wait time between the two. Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) and cetirizine 10 mg were not administered. At the same time, RN 12 indicated the resident was out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document resident refusal or justification for holding insulin, and failed to document notification to the physician for 1of 1 resident reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 8). Findings include:On 12/04/25 at 10:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident 8 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but was not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high). A quarterly Minimum Data Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and received daily insulin injections. A care plan, dated 11/22/22, indicated diabetes with risk for hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) or hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). Interventions included, but not limited to, antidiabetic medications per order, and notify physician and family as needed. A physician order, dated 7/24/25, indicated to administer Lantus SoloStar Solution…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during the medication pass for 3 of 4 residents reviewed on the medication pass (Residents 19, 26, and 67). Findings include: During a continuous medication pass observation, on 12/3/25 from 9:31 a.m. to 9:52 a.m., the following was observed. -Registered Nurse (RN) 12 prepared and administered medication to Resident 19. The medication included a nasal spray, two inhalers, and application of lidocaine patches (topical pain reliever). RN 12 wore gloves during the medication administration but did not perform hand hygiene before, or after, the medication administration. -RN 12 then prepared and administered medication to Resident 26. No hand hygiene was performed before or after the medication administration. -RN 12 then prepared and administered medication to Resident 67. The medication included eye drops. RN 12 wore gloves while administering the eye drops but did not perform hand hygiene before, or after, the medication administration. During an interview, on 12/3/25 at 9:56…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN