Parkview Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 87.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 80.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen manager met required qualifications for 1 of 1 dietary manager qualifications reviewed. 80 of 82 residents in the facility received nutrition provided by facility dietary.Finding includes: During an interview on 12/8/25 8:45 A.M., the dietary manager indicated she did not have a dietary manager certification. On 12/11/25 at 8:25 A.M., the dietary manager's employee file was reviewed; the employee file indicated the dietary manager had been employed since 10/15/14 and had enrolled to take the dietary manager training 8/20/24, but had not yet taken it. During an interview on 12/8/25 at 8:45 A.M., the dietary manager indicated the dietician worked through a contract and was only not in the facility full time. On 12/11/25 at 1:50 P.M., the Administrator provided a policy titled Departmental Leadership Requirements, revised 4/16/24, that indicated If a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional is not employed full-time, the facility must designate a person to serve as the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared to meet the individual needs of residents receiving puree diet for 1 of 3 observation of puree foods. Finding includes: During an interview on 12/10/25 at 11:02 A.M., the dietary manager indicated there were four residents who received puree diet, and one resident received double puree portions. During an observation on 12/10/25 at 11:04 A.M., dietary staff prepared puree zucchini, puree noodles, and puree beef. The beef was not of puree consistency and was dry, thick, with lumps. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 11:14 A.M., the dietary manager indicated puree consistency should be similar to applesauce. During an observation on 12/10/25 at 11:50 A.M., dietary was checking the temperature of the foods served on the steam table. The dietary manager indicated the puree beef was not the appropriate consistency; she added two cups of beef broth to the puree beef and placed in back in the serving dish. The beef was not of puree consistency and was thick with lumps. On 12/11/25 at 1:53…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were self-administering medications were assessed for capability to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 residents with medications observed in their room. (Resident 2)Finding includes:On 12/9/25 at 9:31 A.M., Resident 2 was observed in bed with a bottle of Nystatin, dated 1/2/25, on her bedside table. At that time, Resident 2 indicated that she used the Nystatin as needed to treat thrush (a yeast infection) in her mouth. On 12/9/25 at 11:22 A.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, schizophrenia, and diabetes mellitus. The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/20/25, indicated that Resident 2 had mild cognitive impairment, was independent in eating and transferring, required setup assistance of staff for toileting and bathing, and did not have any infections.Discontinued physician orders included, but were not limited to:Nystatin Mouth/Throat Suspension (a medication used to treat fungal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the development of a resident's comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident 11, Resident 33)Findings include: 1. On 12/09/25 at 10:44 A, M., Resident 33's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified, thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbosacral intervertebral disc disorder, and atrial fibrillation. The current admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment indicated Resident 33 was cognitively intact. Resident 33 required partial to moderate assistance with toileting and dressing, and supervision with transferring. During the 7 day look back period the resident did not require oxygen therapy. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to:Oxygen at 2 liters/minute per nasal cannula as needed for SPO2 <90% as needed dated 10/31/25.Change oxygen tubing, humidifier bottle, and nebulizer circuit weekly every night shift every Sun Label when changed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and obtained a residents daily weight for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 81) Finding includes: On 12/9/25 at 10:51 A.M., Resident 81's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 81 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/24/25, indicated Resident 81 was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance (staff do more than half of the work) for toileting, and received diuretic medication. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Daily weight for 60 days: Notify MD/NP if greater than three pound gain in 24 hours or greater than five pound gain in seven days. Weight to be obtained is dry weight at 0700; Follow medication instructions for (as needed) Bumetanide 1 MG in the morning related to congestive heart failure for 60 days; Start date 11/12/25Bumetanide Oral Tablet 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper oxygen services were provided according to physician orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 33) Findings include: On 12/9/25 at 10:02 A.M., Resident 33 was observed sitting in a wheelchair wearing oxygen (O2) at 2 Liters/Nasal Cannula connected to a concentrator. The concentrator had a humidification bottle attached with no water present. On 12/10/25 at 9:40 A.M., Resident 33 was out of the room and the O2 concentrator was observed with the humidification with no water present. On 12/09/25 at 10:44 A, M., Resident 33's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified, thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbosacral intervertebral disc disorder, and atrial fibrillation. The current admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 33 was cognitively intact. Resident 33 required partial to moderate assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 2 of 7 residents (Resident 28 and Resident 75) observed during the medication pass. There were 25 opportunities observed with 2 errors, resulting in an 8 percent medication error rate. Findings include:1. On 12/11/25 at 7:56 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 3 was observed preparing a Basaglar Kwikpen for insulin administration for Resident 28. RN 3 indicated that Resident 28 had a standing order for 40 units of insulin two times a day. RN 3 set the pen to 40 units, attached the needle, and administered the insulin to Resident 28 in her abdomen. RN 3 did not prime the insulin pen prior to administration. During an interview on 12/11/25 at 8:00 A.M., RN 3 indicated that the pen was supposed to be primed with one or two units of insulin prior to setting the dosage. On 12/11/25 at 9:15 A.M., Resident 28's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus. The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were followed in 1 of 1 residents observed for catheter care. (Resident 6) Hand hygiene was not performed correctly.Finding includes: On 12/10/25 at 9:03 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 7 and CNA 9 were observed performing catheter care for Resident 6. Prior to donning gown and gloves, CNA 9 washed her hands for eight seconds. After performing the care and prior to emptying the catheter bag, CNA 9 washed her hands for 12 seconds. After all care was completed and prior to leaving the room, CNA 9 washed her hands for seven seconds and CNA 7 washed her hands for 13 seconds. During an interview on 12/11/25 at 7:35 A.M., the Infection Preventionist (IP) indicated that staff were trained to wash their hands for at least 40 seconds, but preferably 60 seconds. On 12/11/25 at 12:50 P.M., the Administrator provided a current Hand Hygiene policy, revised 10/28/25, that indicated This facility will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the staff was adequately trained to use an external catheter device for 1 of 1 residents observed with external urinary catheter. (Resident 1) Findings include:On 12/9/25 at 11:33 A.M., Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified urinary incontinence, muscle weakness, and malignant neoplasm of the ascending colon The current admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. Resident 1 required substantial maximum assistance for toileting, hygiene, and transferring and utilizing an external catheter appliance at night. Current Physician Orders included, but were not limited to:External catheter appliance urine collection system - Ensure system is level with the height of the bed when on every shift related to UNSPECIFIED URINARY INCONTINENCE dated 11/14/25.External catheter appliance to cannister drainage for diagnosis of Urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, on 3 of 3 units reviewed. The resident rooms had urine odors, damaged and unclean flooring. (Unit 100, Unit 200, Unit 300) Finding includes : The following was observed between 8:42 a.m. to 9:35 a.m. : room [ROOM NUMBER]- A strong urine odor in the bathroom. The same was observed at 1:17 p.m.room [ROOM NUMBER] - A strong urine odor in the bathroom. The same was observed at 1:19 p.m.Bathroom shared with room [ROOM NUMBER] and 207- Caulking around the wall was crumbling, and debris on the floor.Bathroom shared with room [ROOM NUMBER] and 210- Debris and cobwebs around wall edges, missing flooring. Bathroom shared with room [ROOM NUMBER] and 211- debris around wall edges, crumbling caulking.Bathroom shared with room [ROOM NUMBER] and 214 - debris around edges of wall and cobwebs.Bathroom shared with room [ROOM NUMBER] and 215- holes in linoleum flooring.room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $6.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 73% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN