Heritage Park

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 148.8 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments and communication with the off-site dialysis center for 4 of 7 resident reviewed (Resident 1, Resident 6, Resident 23 and Resident 109).Findings Include:1.Resident 1's record was reviewed on 02/17/2026 at 1:50 PM. Diagnosis included metabolic encephalopathy, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, arteriovenous fistula, acquired and kidney transplant failure.A review of Resident 1's physician's orders, dated 2/16/2026 at 3:37 PM, indicated for the dialysis access site, left upper arm fistula, to monitor access site and effected extremity for signs and symptoms of infection, edema, pain, numbness, bleeding and leaks. Ensure the access site was clean, dry and dressing was intact as ordered. Notify MD of unusual findings and document in progress notes.A review of Resident 1's Dialysis Appointment Assessment record indicated not applicable for bruit and thrill on 1/18/2026 and 1/23/2026.Resident 1's progress notes were reviewed. No documentation was located indicating a change to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper labeling was completed for insulin pens related to open dates and expiration dates. For 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 10, Resident 56, Resident 94, Resident 130 and Resident 132) Findings include:During an observation on 2/18/26 at 8:38 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) 2 on the 300-medication cart, inside the following opened medications were observed: Resident 10 had a Lantus insulin Pen with no open or expiration date documented. Resident 56 had a Basaglar insulin pen with no open or expiration date documented. Resident 94 had a Lantus insulin pen with no open or expiration date documented. Resident 132 had a Glargine insulin pen, with no open or expiration date and a Novolog insulin pen with no opened or expiration date documented. 1. Resident 10's record was reviewed on 2/18/26 at 9:00 AM. Diagnosis included,Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease.A review of physician orders indicated to give Lantus Solostar Units-100 Insulin (insulin glargine) insulin pen, 100 unit/milliliter,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmalogic interventions were completed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. (Resident 8)Findings include:Resident 8's record was reviewed on 2/17/26 at 11:01 AM. Diagnosis included chronic pain. A review of physician orders indicated to give hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 milligram (mg) 1 tablet as needed for moderate to severe pain. every 8 Hours as needed. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated February 2026 indicated Resident 8 received hydrocodone-acetaminophen for pain on 2/15/26 at 3:20 PM. No non-pharmalogical interventions were documented as attempted. A review of the MAR, dated January 2026 indicated Resident 8 received hydrocodone-acetaminophen for pain on the following dates: On 1/11/26 at 6:33 PM, no non-pharmalogical interventions were documented as attempted. On 1/13/26 at 2:36 PM, and at 9:06 PM, no non-pharmalogical interventions were documented as attempted. On 1/14/26 at 5:17 AM, no non-pharmalogical interventions were documented as attempted. On 1/17/26 at 7:05 AM, and at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure updated vaccinations were completed related to the COVID-19 vaccine for 2 of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident 52 and Resident 163)Findings include:1. Resident 52's record was reviewed on 2/16/26 at 1:01 PM. Diagnosis included Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, without mention of fluctuations.A review of the COVID-19 vaccine consent form, dated 10/28/25, indicated the facility was given verbal consent from the Power of Attorney/Health Care to give the vaccine to Resident 52. The COVID-19 vaccine was not documented as given to the resident. 2. Resident 162's record was reviewed on 2/16/26 at 1:30 PM. Diagnosis included Epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus. A review of the COVID-19 vaccine consent form, dated 10/28/25, the facility was given verbal consent from the Power of Attorney/Health Care to give the vaccine to Resident 162. The COVID-19 vaccine was not documented as given to the resident. In an interview, on 2/18/25 at11:05 AM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) indicated the two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to act timely on pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident 105). Findings include: Resident 105's record review was reviewed on 3/6/25 at 9:16AM. A review of Resident 105's pharmacist consultation reports indicated on 12/12/24 his medication Florastar, a probiotic, was suggested to be discontinued. The physician response was I have re-evaluated the therapy and wish to implement the following changes. Written in the comment section by the medical provider was will do. A review of Resident 105's progress notes indicated he had a regulatory visit with a medical provider on 1/3/25 at 6:39AM. There was no note or orders to indicate the physician had been made aware of the December recommendation to discontinue the Florastor. A review of Resident 105's physician orders indicated the medication Florastar 250mg was discontinued on 2/19/25. In an interview, on 3/6/25 at 2:23PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the medication Florastar should have been discontinued on the regulatory visit following the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for 1 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident 120). Findings include: During an observation on 3/5/25 at 9:42 AM, an open bottle of Tums, a tube of biofreeze (topical analgesic), two tubes of barrier creams and a Symbicort (inhaled lung medication) inhaler were observed sitting on top of Resident 120's bed. During an interview, on 3/5/25 at 9:50 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 indicated medicines may be kept at bedside if an assessment indicates they demonstrate the ability to self-administer the medication correctly and secure it in a locked box. He indicated the medications observed on Resident 120's bed should not be left out when unattended. He indicated Resident 120 was out of the building at a medical appointment. LPN 2 collected the medications and placed them in a secure box in the room. Resident 120's record was reviewed on 3/7/25 at 9:06 AM. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide personal care and hygiene to dependent residents for 4 of 34 residents reviewed. (Resident 122, Resident 27, Resident 72, and Resident 113). Findings include: 1) During an observation and interview, on 2/22/24 at 10:08 A.M., Resident 122 in her room indicated she had a very hard time getting her teeth brushed. She indicated staff were too busy to assist her with brushing her teeth at night and reluctant to do it during the day. Resident 122 was observed dressed in a hospital gown. She indicated if she were able to dress herself there was no way she would be dressed in a hospital gown, but she had no choice and being dressed in the gown was the least of her concerns. Resident 122's record was reviewed on 2/23/23 at 11:16 A.M. Resident 122 diagnoses included history of stroke affecting dominant right side, paralysis of right side of body, respiratory failure, heart disease, muscle weakness, anemia, and unsteadiness in her feet.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN