Waters Of Fort Wayne Skilled Nursing Facility, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 24.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 48.5 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity during verbal interactions for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights (Resident O and Resident P). Findings include:A report, dated 1/17/26, alleged a Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) spoke harshly to residents, was mean, and loud. It was alleged the CNA yelled and screamed in the hallways and used curse words when speaking with Resident O. 1. On 2/10/26 at 10:09 A.M., Resident O, identified as interviewable, was interviewed in her room. She indicated CNA 6 had repeatedly come to her room and barked out orders at her. The resident indicated CNA 6 yelled at her and would tell her to get up, get dressed, go to the bathroom and go down to eat. CNA 6 always spoke to her in a raised voice, with a harsh tone, and attitude. At times, the resident alleged, CNA 6 would curse at her and her roommate and could be heard cursing out in the hallway. She indicated she had reported CNA 6 to the charge nurse and had told CNA 6 not to come into her room again. When asked, she indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written notice with appeal rights and discharge planning was provided prior to an involuntary discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident L). Findings include:A report, dated 1/23/26, indicated Resident L was going to be discharged involuntarily. The resident required assistance with his activities of daily living (ADL's) and nursing care for assessment of unstable conditions and frequent hospitalizations. On 2/9/26 at 12:39 p.m., Resident L's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included persistent atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), diabetes, and need for personal assistance. An admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident L had no cognitive impairment. He was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and putting on/off footwear. He required maximum assistance with showering, lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Moderate assistance was required for upper body dressing, and bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for anticoagulant (blood thinning) medications were administered and blood test monitoring completed as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with anticoagulant therapy (Resident C).Findings include:A report, dated 11/7/25, alleged Resident C had not received Coumadin (blood thinner) as ordered by the physician. This resulted in the resident having fluctuating lab results.On 11/10/25 at 1:04 P.M., Resident C's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included dementia, heart failure, and prosthetic heart valve.A care plan, revised on 7/29/23, indicated Resident C was at risk for abnormal bleeding due to use of anticoagulants (blood thinner). The goal was for his PT/INR blood tests (clotting ability of blood) to remain within therapeutic range (INR between 2.0-3.0). Interventions included monitoring labs/blood tests as ordered, report critical results to physician immediately, and administer medication as ordered at the same time daily.A physician order, dated 5/24/25, indicated to give…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess injuries following falls, determine root cause of falls, and develop effective interventions to prevent further falls from occurring for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident H).Findings include:On 11/10/25 at 10:45 A.M., Resident H was observed seated at a table in the lounge, across from the nurse's station. She sat up straight in a Broda chair with her head down on the table. There was no pillow in the chair with her. Staff were across the hall at the nurses station. -At 12:16 P.M., Resident H was observed sitting up when her tray was placed in front of her. Resident H had a red scab across the bridge of her nose and purple/red bruising around her right eye. There was no pillow in the chair with the resident. Staff were walking by in the hall.-At 1:30 P.M., Resident H was seated upright in the Broda chair, in front of a table in the lounge area, with her head down on the table. There was no pillow in the chair with the resident. There were no staff in the area.On 11/12/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation related to falls, hospice services, and anticoagulant therapy for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident H and Resident C).Findings include:1. On 11/10/25 at 12:16 P.M., Resident H was observed with purple/red bruising around her right eye and a red scab across the bridge of her nose. Resident H's record was reviewed on 11/10/25 at 3:08 P.M. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's dementia. The resident was receiving hospice services for end-stage dementia.A care plan indicated Resident H had the potential for falls due to confusion and extensive history of falls. Interventions, revised on 6/26/25, included not leaving the resident unattended in common areas or in her room. A new intervention, dated 11/9/25, was to tilt back Resident H's Broda chair while up.A change in condition form, dated 11/9/25 at 8:00 a.m., indicated Resident H had fallen from her Broda chair. Her nose had been bleeding but was able to be stopped with applied pressure. Neurological (Neuro) checks were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled with opened dates. For 1 of 2 medications carts observed. (Resident 2, Resident 10, Resident 9, Resident 3, Resident 1, and Resident 7) Findings include:, During an observation, on 6/27/25 at 1:30PM, on 200 hall medication cart with Registered Nurse 4 (RN) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the following was observed: At 1:33 PM in the top-drawer, Resident 2's Albuterol AER HFA had no open date. At 1:35 PM in the top drawer, Resident 10's Breo Ellipta INH 100-25 mcg was dated 5/21/25 with 0 puffs left. At 1:36 PM in the top drawer, Resident 9's Breo Ellipta INH 100-25 mcg was dated 5/21/25 with 1 puff left. In an interview, on 6/27/25 at 1:37 PM, the ADON indicated she thought inhalers are good for 30 days. The ADON was observed to be adding open dates to medications that had been pulled out of cart with no dates. During an observation on 6/27/25 at 1:39 PM, in the 3rd drawer down the middle, there was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain temperature logs for cooked foods, refrigerators, freezers, and the dishwasher throughout the month of June 2025. 38 of 39 residents residing in the facility ate food prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: During an observation, on 6/27/25 at 9:10AM, there was incomplete documentation on the food temperature logs and 2 of 3 refrigerators, no logs for 1 of 3 refrigerators, and no temperature monitoring logs for the freezer and the dishwasher. The food temperature logs were missing the following information: Food temperature logs were dated June 1, 2025, through June 10, 2025. There were no logs available for June 11, 2025-June 27, 2025, for any of the three meals served. In an interview, on 6/27/25 at 9:12AM, [NAME] 9 indicated the only temp logs for the refrigerators, freezers, and dishwasher were the ones on the manager's desk. [NAME] 9 indicated the food temp logs should have been on the desk as well. In an interview, on 6/27/25 at 1:36PM, the Regional Dietary Manager indicated there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure facial hair was trimmed for 2 of 2 residents reviewed. (Resident 2 and Resident 11) Findings include: 1)During an observation, on 06/27/25 at 10:10 AM, Resident 2 had 3 chin hairs over an inch long, greyish white in color. During an observation, on 06/30/25 at 11:44 AM, Resident 2 had not been shaved and the chin hairs were still seen. During an observation, on 7/1/25 at 8:38 AM, Resident 2 had not been shaved and the chin hairs were still seen. Resident 2's record review, on 6/30/25 at 1:16PM, indicated diagnoses included macular degeneration, osteoporosis, and weakness. Resident 2's care plan had a focus on Activities of Daily Living (ADL) need for assistance. An intervention was Resident 2 would have all ADLs met by staff. In the care plan under skin at risk for breakdown an intervention was that her skin would be monitored daily during care. The care plan did not specifically address female facial hair. 2) During an observation. on 06/27/25 at 10:09 AM, Resident 11 had a full beard on her chin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the tacitly failed to ensure a resident maintained their weight for 1 of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident 2). Findings include: Resident 2's record review was on 06/30/25 at 08:48 AM. Resident 2's diagnoses included Anxiety, osteoarthritis, depression, glaucoma, anemia, cataracts, macular degeneration, neuropathy, and pacemaker. Resident 2's height was 5 ft 5 inches. Resident 2's weights were as follows December 141 January 2025 130 February 2025 130 March 2025 125 April 2025 123.4 May 2025 124 June 2025 123 a 6 month loss of 12.77% Nurtition at Risk notes indicated the facility had Resident 2 on weight monitoring and Nutrition at Risk between January 10, 2025 through March 18, 2025 because she had a wound. In March, the facility stopped Nutrition at risk because the note indicated there was no change in monthly weights between February and January therefore weights were stabilized. Resident 2's physician orders showed an order for Boost twice a day started on 2/28/25. Resident 2's weight on 7/1/25 was 121.5 lbs. Resident 2 lost a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding weight monitoring for 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 10 and Resident 6). Findings include: 1) Resident 10's record was reviewed 8/29/24 at 12:28 PM. Her diagnoses included cellulitis of left lower limb, diabetes, speech difficulties, dementia, acquired absence of left toes, acquired absence of right great toe, and heart failure. Resident 10's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Section C -Cognitive Patterns indicated a score on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS ) of 10. A score of 10 indicated moderate cognitive decline. Resident 10's current care plan indicated a focus on nutrition with a goal of not having signs or symptoms of dehydration through next review. An intervention was monitoring weights and intakes dated 7/1/2021. Resident 10's physician orders, dated 5/20/22, included an order specific for heart failure; to obtian a daily weight after voiding and before breakfast/medications with same clothes each day. The order indicated to notify the doctor any of 2 lb weight gain within…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $438K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN