Rosegate Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 241 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 133.3 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · F2026-01-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were served in a sanitary and safe manner for 2 of 3 observations. Staff hair was not covered while in the kitchen, food preparation, and serving areas. (Cook 2, Culinary Aide 3) Findings include: During a kitchen observation, on 1/13/26 from 11:25 a.m. to 11:35 a.m., the following was observed:- [NAME] 2 was observed working at the steamtable that held the noon meal foods. [NAME] 2 was observed taking the starting food temperatures and plating the noon meal. [NAME] 2 was observed wearing a white hair net that covered the hair above his ears to the top of his head. He was also observed wearing a beard restraint that covered the facial hair near the jaw line, below the ears and surrounding the lip area. [NAME] 2's facial hair, approximately one-half inch in length, located in front of the ears, was observed to not be covered. - Culinary Aide 3 was observed walking through-out the kitchen area and near the steamtable that held the noon meal foods. Culinary Aide 3 was observed wearing a white hair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was referred to the State-designated authority contractor for a Level I screening Resident Review (PASARR) mental health assessment for new diagnosis for mental illness evaluation and determination for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Residents 12, Resident 79) Findings include: 1. On 1/15/26 at 11:35 a.m., Resident 79's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure and major depressive disorder. Resident 79 was admitted to facility on 9/24/24 with a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level I completed. On 9/24/24, a new diagnosis of psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition was added without a new PASARR Level I completed. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/9/25, indicated Resident 79 was moderately cognitively impaired. 2. On 1/15/26 at 1:05 p.m., Resident 12's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to hold blood pressure medications for a resident with low blood pressure per the physician orders for 1 of 26 clinical record reviews. (Resident 98) Finding includes: On 1/16/26 at 11:45 a.m., the clinical record of Resident 98 was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but was not limited to, venous insufficiency and hypertension. The Physician Orders included, but was not limited to: - Metoprolol succinate tablet, extended release 24 hour, 50 milligrams (mg), administer 50 mg, by mouth one time a day. Hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 110, or heart rate less than 60, initiated 1/8/26. - Lisinopril tablet 20 mg, by mouth one time a day, hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 110, initiated 1/8/26. A Vital Sign Record, dated 1/9/26, indicated Resident 98's systolic blood pressure was 90. A Medication Administration Record, dated January 2026, indicated lisinopril and metoprolol were administered on 1/9/26. During an interview on 1/16/26 at 12:03 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the lisinopril and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 2 allegations of misappropriation of property. (RN 3, Resident D, Resident E) Findings include: During an interview on 2/20/25 at 9:40 a.m., the Administrator indicated that during a facility wide audit, it was brought to management's attention on 1/29/25 that a few narcotic count sheets, whose counts were correct and had been initially thought to be fine, appeared to have medications signed out for residents who had been out at the hospital at the time of the suspicious administration. The two suspicious narcotic administration sheets, one for Resident D and one for Resident E, had each been signed out by RN 3. RN 3 had a drug screening test on 1/29/25 after the reasonable suspicion was discovered from the medications signed out for residents who were not physically in the building. RN 3 tested positive for both opioids and benzodiazepines. RN 3 did not confess to taking the residents' medications, telling the Administrator RN 3 had taken…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse when a CNA spit in a resident's face for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B, CNA 1) Findings include: On 1/15/25 at 8:23 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a copy of a facility reportable incident, dated 12/23/24. A review of the incident report indicated CNA 1 spit in Resident B's face. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/15/25 at 8:54 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stress compression fracture of first lumbar vertebrae and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/7/25, indicated Resident B was severely cognitively impaired. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 9:35 a.m., the Administrator indicated, on 12/23/24 at approximately 9:15 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 called her to report that CNA 1 spit at Resident B. CNA 1 was terminated after the investigation was completed. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 9:58 a.m., LPN 1 indicated Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the abuse policy and ensure an alleged perpetrator of abuse was immediately removed from the facility for 1 of 3 allegations of abuse reviewed. (CNA 1) Findings include: On 1/15/25 at 8:23 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a copy of a facility reportable incident, dated 12/23/24. A review of the incident report indicated CNA 1 spit in Resident B's face. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 9:58 a.m., LPN 1 indicated Resident B was being aggressive and combative with staff, so LPN 1 and three CNA's went in Resident B's room to try to provide care. During care Resident B slapped CNA 1 in the face. LPN 1 attempted to redirect Resident B, then Resident B spit in CNA 1's face. At that time, CNA 1 said oh no way and spit back in Resident B's face. LPN 1 immediately removed CNA 1 from Resident B's room. LPN 1 went to the employee break room to call the Administrator and CNA 1 walked to the restroom, which was not in sight of the break room. When LPN 1 got to the nurse's station CNA 1 was walking out of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that written Notice of Transfer and Discharge was provided to the resident and resident's representative for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for written transfer and discharge notification. The transfer and bed-hold appeal process was not provided to the resident or the resident representative. (Resident 42, Resident 107, Resident 279) Findings include: 1. On 10/30/24, at 4:30 p.m., Resident 42's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fractured femur (thighbone) and Alzheimer's disease. The face sheet indicated Resident 42 had a resident representative. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/21/24, indicated Resident 42 was severely cognitively impaired. The clinical record's census tab indicated Resident 42 was transferred to the hospital emergency department on 10/11/24. The ASC Hospital-ER (Emergency Room) Transfer Form document, dated 10/11/24, indicated Resident 42 was transferred to the hospital emergency department for a facility-initiated hospital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation for 2 of 21 residents reviewed. (Resident B, Resident C) Findings include: 1. On 10/28/24 at 10:00 a.m., the clinical record of Resident C was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, myocardial infarction (a heart attack), COPD (a lung disease causing breathing difficulties), and dependence on renal dialysis (treatment that removes excess fluid, waste, and toxins from the blood). A physician's order report, dated for active orders for 10/1/24 through 10/31/24 included, but was not limited to: An order with a start date of 10/19/24 and a discontinued date of 10/20/24, to obtain a daily weight for Resident C with special instructions to notify MD (Medical Doctor) of a weight gain of three pounds in one day or of five pounds in a week once a day at 5:00 a.m. An order with a start date of 10/20/24 and no end date to obtain a daily weight for Resident C with special instructions to notify MD (Medical Doctor) of a weight gain of three pounds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN