Waters Of Indianapolis, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 64.4 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. A male resident was observed leaving a female resident's room. The female resident indicated the male resident touched her breast. (Resident B, Resident C) Findings include:On 12/30/25 at 9:09 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a copy of a facility reportable incident, dated 12/5/25 at 12:30 p.m. A review of the reportable incident brief description indicated Resident C made an allegation that Resident B touched her breast.During an interview on 12/31/25 at 8:15 a.m., Resident C was unable to describe the details of a sexual abuse allegation that she made against Resident B. Resident C repeated the word fine after each question of the interview. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 12/31/25 at 9:02 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, hemiplegia that affected his right side, and diabetes.An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/27/25, indicated Resident B…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a full description of an allegation of sexual abuse was reported to the state health department for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. A male resident was observed leaving a female resident's room. The female resident was found lying in her bed with the sheet pulled down, her brief unlatched on one side and bent down in the front, and her gown pulled up. (Resident B, Resident C) Findings include:On 12/30/25 at 9:09 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a copy of a facility reportable incident, dated 12/5/25 at 12:30 p.m. A review of the reportable incident brief description indicated Resident C made an allegation that Resident B touched her breast.During an interview on 12/31/25 at 8:15 a.m., Resident C was unable to describe the details of a sexual abuse allegation that had been made against Resident B. Resident C repeated the word fine after each question of the interview. On 12/31/25 at 8:30 a.m., the DON provided a copy of a written statement from CNA 1, dated 12/5/25 at 11:50 a.m. (approximately 1 hour…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment when the bathroom wall heater covers were removed leaving the metal heating elements exposed for 3 of 3 random observations; and failed to ensure the bathroom door frames were free from rust and decay for 2 of 3 random observations. Findings include:1. During a random observation of the secured memory care unit, on 7/21/25 from 8:25 a.m. until 9:05 a.m., observed the bathroom wall heaters in rooms H-8, H-10, and H-11. Each of the bathroom wall heaters were approximately six inches from the floor. The front cover of the heaters had been removed, which left approximately 40 small silver metal discs lined in a row across the inside of the heater exposed. During an interview, on 7/21/25 at 12:00 p.m., the Maintenance Supervisor indicated the heaters were still in working order and the heating elements should not have been left exposed to the residents. 2. During a random observation of the secured memory care unit, on 7/21/25 from 8:25 a.m. until 9:05 a.m., observed the bathroom door…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff's facial hair was covered to prevent exposure to food and drinks while in the kitchen for 1 of 2 observations. This had the potential to affect 63 of 63 residents residing in the facility who received food from the kitchen. (Dietary Aide 2) Finding includes: During a kitchen observation on 6/22/25 from 11:40 a.m. to 12:45 p.m., the following was observed: - Dietary Aide 2 was observed in the kitchen near the prepared foods that were uncovered on the steam table. Dietary Aide 2 was observed to have facial hair on his chin approximately one fourth inch in length and was observed scooping ice from the ice machine into glasses, pouring drinks from a pitcher to be served to the residents. Dietary Aide 2 was not observed to be wearing beard net. During an interview on 6/22/25 at 12:45 p.m., the Dietary Manager indicated that staff's hair should be covered when in kitchen. During an interview on 6/22/25 at 1:04 p.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing indicated that hair nets should be worn when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from accident hazards for 1 of 1 observation, potentially affecting 13 of 19 self-mobile cognitively impaired residents residing in the Memory Care Unit. An electrical cord was observed on the floor in the middle of a walkway area that was used by the residents. (Resident 29) Finding includes: During an observation of the Memory Care Unit on 6/23/25 from 9:00 a.m. to 9:10 a.m., the following was observed: - The Floor Technician was using an electric buffer/scrubber (buffer) machine on the floor space between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The machine's yellow colored electric cord was approximately one inch in circumference and was approximately 20 feet in length. The cord was observed to be plugged into the hallway outlet located near room [ROOM NUMBER]. As the Floor Technician used the buffer machine, he was observed moving from one side of the hallway to the other side of the hallway as he made his way from room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed for 1 of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. The care plan was not developed for a resident who was at risk for falls and whose preference was to keep the bed in the high position. (Resident 42) Finding includes: On 6/22/25 at 10:22 a.m., Resident 42 was observed resting in bed. The bed was located next to the wall with the resident's right side near the wall. Resident 42's bed was observed to be in the highest position and was approximately 40 inches above the floor. The handheld bed control device was observed on the bed and within reach of the resident. No staff were visible in the area during that time. During an interview at that time, Resident 42 indicated she was able to adjust the height of the bed and she liked it in the highest position. On 6/22/25 at 12:33 p.m., Resident 42 was observed resting in bed while eating her noon meal. The bed was located next to the wall with the resident's right side near the wall. Resident 42's bed was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0659 — isolated
  Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication was administered by qualified personnel for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 6/24/25 at 1:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a copy of a facility reportable incident, dated 5/26/25. The incident indicated on 5/26/25, Resident B reported to the facility that on 5/25/25, CNA 8 administered medication that Resident B believed was Tylenol. On 6/24/25 at 1:22 p.m., the Director of Nursing provided a copy of the facility investigation. The investigation included, but was not limited to: The Administrator's written statement, dated 5/26/25, indicated the Administrator had interviewed CNA 8. CNA 8 admitted giving Resident B pills. CNA 8 obtained the tylenol from behind the nurses station and gave them to the Resident B because he did not want the resident to have to wait for the nurse. An email from RN 10, dated 5/26/25, indicated RN 10 had worked on the night of the incident. Resident B was under her care that night. RN 10 was not aware…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment cart was securely locked for 1 of 1 random observations. (Faith Hall Treatment Cart) Finding includes: On 6/22/25 from 8:15 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., observed a treatment cart on the Faith Hall to be unlocked and easily opened. No staff were observed in the area. Several residents were sitting in the hall in wheelchairs approximately 4 feet from the cart. The contents of the treatment cart, included but was not limited to: - multiple 0.5 oz tubes of Antifungal cream 2% (used to treat a skin fungus). The label indicated Keep out of reach - multiple 60 gram tubes of Fludocinonide cream 0.05% (used to treat inflammation of the skin). The label indicated Keep out of reach - multiple 1 ounce tubes of gentamicin cream 1%, (used to treat skin infections). The label indicated Keep out of reach. During an interview on 6/22/25 at 8:30 a.m., LPN 3 indicated the cart should have been locked. On 6/23/25 at 2:08 p.m., the Administrator provided a policy titled Medication Storage In The Facility, dated July 2024, and indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. The two-step tuberculosis skin test series was not completed. (Resident 15, Resident 58) Findings include: 1. On 6/22/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 15's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegia (paralysis of the legs or lower body), bipolar disorder (a mental illness characterized by extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels), and chronic osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone). Resident 15 had an admission date of 1/16/25. Resident 15's TB (tuberculosis) test administration history indicated that the resident had an order for a first step TB skin test to be administered 1/17/25 which had been coded on the EMAR (electronic medication administration record) as a 2, which indicated the resident refused the administration. The second step TB skin test ordered for 1/31/25 indicated other/see nurse note. Neither the first step or the second step TB skin test were documented as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of medications. (Resident C) Finding includes: On 3/21/25 at 9:50 a.m., the clinical record for Resident C was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition affecting blood sugar levels). An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 2/7/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact. A physician's order, initiated 2/8/25 and discontinued on 3/1/25, indicated Resident C had tirzepatide (an antidiabetic medication used to treat type 2 diabetes and for weight loss) 15 mg (milligrams)/0.5 mL (milliliters) ordered to be given by subcutaneous (under the skin) injection once weekly on Saturdays. A physician's order, initiated on 3/7/25 and with no end date, indicated Resident C had tirzepatide, 15 mg/0.5 mL ordered to be given by subcutaneous injection once weekly on Fridays. During an interview on 3/21/25 at 10:30 a.m., the Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-03 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $885K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN