Waters Of Lagrange Skilled Nursing Facility, The
787 N Detroit St, Lagrange, IN 46761 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (260) 463-2172 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.8% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 33.3% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.1% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.4% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.0% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.6% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.2% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.5% | 79.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.18 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.08 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
31.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 31.0%CMS range 21.8–48.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.2–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 4.2–13.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 83.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff effectively identified skin impairment on the left inner calf from friction and shear was correctly identified as a pressure injury, failed to ensure a physician's order was received prior to the use of a medical device, and failed to ensure a resident with a history of pressure injuries received effective treatment and services to prevent the wound from deteriorating, from developing infection, or to prevent the development of a second wound for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for wound care. (Resident J) This deficient practice resulted in Wound 1 deteriorating to a stage three pressure injury with infection and required sharp debridement. Findings include: In an interview on 9/3/24 at 12:07 P.M., the Resident Council President (RCP) indicated Resident J, who sat at her table in the dining room, had been taken back to her room, without eating lunch, due to her crying out in pain. The RCP was very concerned for the resident because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and evaluate smoking safety for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident F and Resident H). The facility also failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards by not correcting bunched up and uneven carpet in a resident hallway creating a tripping hazard for residents. Findings include:1.a. A report, dated 3/25/26, indicated Resident F had a fall while smoking in the facility parking lot. The fall resulted in nose fractures and hematoma to the right knee. On 3/27/26 at 1:12 P.M., Resident F's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and nicotine dependence. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/25, indicated Resident F had moderately impaired cognition. Quarterly Smoking Evaluations, dated 9/30/25 and 12/29/25, indicated the resident was not using smoking, nicotine, or tobacco products. Current care plans indicated she was at risk for falls, had impaired cognition due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all opened food items were labeled and dated, expired food was discarded, and thermometers were properly maintained in cooled and frozen food storage areas in the kitchen. 71 of 71 residents residing in the facility were served food prepared in the kitchen.During an observation in the walk-in refrigerator, on 09/04/2025 9:28 AM, a Ziploc bag containing pink sliced meat had illegible markings on the package . A plastic sealed bag labeled ham had a date of 8/27/25. A thermometer on an upper shelf had a temperature of 16 degrees. No items in the refrigerator appeared frozen solid or had visible frost. In an interview, on 09/04/2025 9:30 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) indicated opened items should be used within 3 days or discarded. She indicated the thermometer did not appear to have an accurate reading and replaced the thermometer. In an observation in the walk-in freezer, on 09/04/2025 9:31 AM, no internal thermometer was observed. In an interview, on 09/04/2025 9:32 AM, the DM indicated the thermometer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in locked environments when not directly attended for 32 of 71 residents residing in the facility.During an observation on 09/04/2025 11:56 AM the treatment cart and a medication cart on the southwest unit were both unlocked with no staff in the area. One resident was observed propelling her wheelchair in the immediate area of the carts. In an interview, on 09/04/2025 11:58 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 indicated the medication cart contained medications in pill and liquid forms and the treatment cart contained medication in liquid, cream and ointment forms. She indicated both carts should be locked when not attended to by staff. In an observation, on 09/04/2025 12:12 PM, the lock on the medication refrigerator in the medication room was not engaged. A vial of lorazepam liquid, a controlled substance was observed in the refrigerator. In an interview, on 09/04/2025 at 12:13 PM, LPN 3 indicated the lock on the refrigerator frequently did not fully engage and sometimes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation in 3 of 24 resident records reviewed. (Resident 78, Resident 17, and Resident 42)During an observation, on 9/5/25 at 1:30 PM, the following was observed: A clean and dry dressing covered the insertion site of a Jackson Pratt Drain (JP Drain) on Resident 78's left lateral chest.1. A record review for Resident 78 began on 9/8/25 9:12 AM. Diagnoses included a history of kidney transplant, colostomy, and end stage kidney disease.A review of Resident 78's current quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated their BIMS (Basic Interview for Mental Status) score was 13 (cognitively intact). The MDS indicated the resident had an ostomy present. A review of physician orders, dated 8/30/25, indicated a dressing change to the JP drain was changed every evening. A review of physician orders, dated 8/30/25, indicated the JP Drain was to be drained, and output recorded every shift.A review of physician orders, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident K, Resident L, Resident M, and Resident N). The deficient practice was corrected on 1/22/25 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore past non-compliance. Findings include: A facility-reported incident was submitted to the Indiana Department of Health on 1/10/25, which indicated potential misappropriation of resident property had occurred and the facility was investigating the allegation. On 2/3/25 at 3:10 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. She indicated she had been conducting routine compliance audits of controlled medication records when she noticed a pattern of administration. Licensed Practical Nurse 5 (LPN) administered opioid pain medications to residents with as needed orders for pain medication consistently and without assessment of pain prior to administration. The DON indicated LPN 5's documentation of administration was not completed according to facility policy and the administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident J). The deficient practice was corrected on 1/22/25 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore past non-compliance. Findings include: A facility reported incident to the Indiana Department of Health, dated 1/21/25, indicated an allegation of verbal abuse had occurred and was being investigated by the facility. The allegation involved verbal abuse from a Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) to a resident. On 2/3/25 at 12:53 P.M., Resident J's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset. A significant change Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/8/25, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition and required maximal to dependent care for her activities of daily living. She had no behaviors or rejection of care. A care plan, dated 1/8/25, indicated Resident J had cognitive impairments related to dementia and short term memory loss. Her goals were to have her needs met and anticipated. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet the anticipated and unanticipated needs for 82 of 82 residents residening in the facility receiving nursing services. Findings include: An Indiana Department of Health complaint intake, dated 9/10/24 at 8:14 PM, indicated on 9/10/24 one nurse, one QMA, and one CNA were scheduled in the building for the evening shift. The complaint indicated CNAs frequently work on a hall by themselves with over 30 residents to assist to bed. An as worked schedule form, verified by payroll records, dated 9/10/24, indicated one certified nurse aide worked between 6:30PM and 10:00 PM for a total of 89 residents. One QMA worked on the Southwest Unit with 38 residents, one LPN worked on the Northwest Unit with 22 residents, and one LPN worked on the dementia unit with 18 residents. An Indiana Department of Health complaint intake, dated 9/18/24 at 7:32 AM, indicated one CNA was present in the building to assist residents to get up and dressed for breakfast. She indicated 80 residents were in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a process was in place to identify and correct deficiencies from re-occurring for 82 of 82 residents residing in the facility Findings include: The facility annual survey completed on 12/1/2023 identified noncompliance regarding failure to report, failure to investigate incidents, failure to follow care planned interventions to prevent accidents, failure to maintaining minimum staffing levels to ensure safety, and failure to investigate and identify underlying causes of resident specific behaviors. The facility indicated the noncompliance would be corrected by 1/8/2024. In an interview, on 9/30/24 at 11:40 AM, the Administrator indicated Resident 19's elopement had not been reported to the proper agencies. See F609 for additional information about failure to report incidents requiring reporting. In an interview, on 10/2/24 at 1:42 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated Former Employee 45, working on the Assisted Living unit,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent resident elopement, falls and ensure safe smoking for 4 of 6 residents reviewed (Residents 32, Resident 19, Resident 64 and Resident 76). Findings include: 1. On 9/26/24 at 11:12 AM, a voice was heard calling for help. A staff member was observed entering the shower room. A voice was heard asking who the nurse was. The Director of Nursing (DON) entered the shower room. A voice was heard saying they were unable to stand the resident up. An overhead page was heard summoning the maintenance staff to the unit STAT (immediately). On 9/26/24 at 11:55 AM, Resident 32 was observed leaving the unit on a gurney escorted by 2 paramedics. Resident 32 was covered with a blanket. In an interview, on 9/26/24 at 11:57 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 30 indicated they had started working at the facility on 9/12/24 and they were being trained by CNA 35. CNA 30 indicated they entered the shower room after hearing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive (code status) was accurate for 1 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: Resident 4's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:09 AM. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (emphysema) unspecified dementia, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder. Resident 4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated their Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 (no cognitive deficit). The MDS indicated Resident 4 required substantial to maximum assistance for activities of daily living. Resident 4's Care Plan, dated [DATE], indicated their code status was Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). A physician order, revision date [DATE], indicated DNR status had been discontinued. A Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Status Form, signed by Resident 4's representative on [DATE] indicated the resident's code status was to have CPR initiated. Resident 4's physician signed the form on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure family notification of an episode of resident-to-resident contact for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 63). Findings include: Resident 63's record was reviewed on 9/30/24 at 1:13 PM. Diagnoses included dementia with mood disturbance, Parkinson's Disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and visual hallucinations. Resident 63's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 3 (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 63 required substantial to maximal assistance to roll left and right, to move from a lying to a sitting position and to move from a sitting to a standing position. Resident 63's Care Plan, dated 12/8/23, indicated the resident did not participate in many activities. The Care Plan Indicated Resident 63 mostly sat in the background and watched others. The target goal was for the resident to participate in activities of interest at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure contents of a urinary catheter bag were not visible from the hallway for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 44). Findings include: During an observation, on 9/25/24 at 9:42 AM, Resident 44 was lying in bed in a semi-reclined position with a catheter bag attached to the bedframe and facing the door. Resident 44's door was open, his bag was in plain sight and visible from the hallway. The bag was about half full of yellow liquid. During an observation on 9/26/24 at 6:44 PM, Resident 44 was lying in bed with a catheter bag attached to the bedframe and facing the door with about 200 milliliters of yellow liquid in the bag. The bag was in plain sight from the hallway. During an observation, on 9/27/24 at 2:50 PM, Resident 44 was lying in bed with a catheter bag attached to the bedframe and facing the hallway about two-thirds full of yellow liquid. During an interview, on 9/27/24 at 2:50 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 25 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 41). Findings include: An Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System Incident Number 189, dated 9/13/24 at 2:45 PM, indicated Resident 41's family member got loud with the resident during a visit at the facility. Immediate action taken was the removal of Resident 41's visitor from the facility. A preventative measure was the visitor not being permitted at the facility during the investigation. Follow up on 9/20/24 indicated on 9/13/24 a verbal altercation was overheard in Resident 41's room. The visitor was identified as Resident 41's Power of Attorney (POA). The visitor seemed intoxicated as evidenced by their appearance and smell. The visitor was asked to leave the facility immediately. Resident 41 voiced concern the visitor would return. Adult Protective Services recommended a visit restriction and a possible guardianship change. Resident 41's visitation was to be monitored for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure unusual incidents were reported to the appropriate agencies for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 63 and Resident 19). Findings include: 1. Resident 63's record was reviewed on 9/30/24 at 1:13 PM. Diagnoses included dementia with mood disturbance, Parkinson's Disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and visual hallucinations. Resident 63's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 3 (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 63 required substantial to maximal assistance to roll left and right, to move from lying to a sitting position and to move from a sitting to standing position. A Behavior Charting note, dated 9/18/24 at 5:19 PM, indicated Resident 63 kissed another resident (Resident 49) on the lips in the dining room. Separation of the residents was effective. Resident 63's progress notes, dated 9/18/24 through 9/30/24, did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the elopement of a resident was investigated for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents 19). Findings include: Resident 19's record was reviewed on 9/27/24 at 10:00 AM. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, complete traumatic amputation of right lower leg, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. Resident 19's current quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated her Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 8, moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated for 7 to 11 days in a period of 14 days, she felt tired or had little energy, had trouble concentrating, poor appetite and was on an antidepressant. The MDS indicated she had lost weight of 5% in the last month or 10% in last 6 months and was not on Physician prescribed weight loss regimen. The MDS indicated the resident was impaired on 1 side of her lower extremity and used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure showers were consistently offered for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident 76). Findings include: During an interview, on 9/26/24 at 10:08 AM, Resident 48 indicated he was not getting showers on a regular basis. He indicated he was supposed to have a shower on Wednesdays and Saturdays at 3:00 pm. He indicated when staff did not show up to give him a shower, he would frequently go to the nurses' station to find out what was going on and was told they were short staffed. Resident 48's record was reviewed on 9/30/24 at 10:25 AM. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right posterior cerebral artery, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left, non-dominant side, and diabetes mellitus, type 2 without complications. Resident 48's current quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated their Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 (cognitively intact). The MDS indicated Resident 48 required moderate assistance with bathing and rejection of care was not exhibited.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure supervision and maintain seizure precautions for 2 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident 32 and Resident 5). Findings include: During an observation, on 9/26/24 at 11:12 AM, upon entering the memory Care unit, a voice was heard calling for help. A staff member was observed entering the shower room. A voice was heard asking who the nurse was. The Director of Nursing (DON) wsa observed entering the shower room. On 9/26/24 at 11:55 AM, Resident 32 was observed leaving the unit on a gurney escorted by 2 paramedics. Resident 32 was covered with a blanket. In an interview, on 9/26/24 at 11:57 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 30 indicated they had started working at the facility on 9/12/24 and they were being trained by CNA 35. CNA 30 indicated they entered the shower room after hearing the resident call for help. CNA 30 observed Resident 32 sitting on the floor in the shower with their right arm stuck in the handrail. CNA 30 indicated they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide trauma informed care by identifying triggers to minimize re-traumatization for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 41). Findings include: Resident 41's record was reviewed on 9/27/24 at 3:00 PM. Diagnoses included systemic lupus erythema, adult failure to thrive, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, obsessive compulsive disorder, depression, agoraphobia with panic disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Resident 41's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated their Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 6 (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 41had a gastrointestinal (g tube) feeding tube. Resident 41's Care Plan, dated 5/20/24, indicated the resident had a diagnosis of PTSD. The target goal was for Resident 41 to be symptom free through 11/22/24. Interventions included sensitivity to the resident's feelings, encouragement of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure specific resident behaviors were identified, investigated and communicated with individualized interventions for a resident with dementia for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 49). Findings include: On 9/26/24 at 11:15 AM, Resident 49 was observed standing up from dining room table. Resident 49 was observed walking while pushing their locked wheelchair. Resident 49 spoke in an agitated voice when they were being followed. Resident 49's record was reviewed on 9/27/24 at 11:36 AM. Diagnoses included alcohol dependence with alcohol induced dementia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, psychotic disorder with hallucinations and mild cognitive impairment. Resident 49's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident 49's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 10 (moderate cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 49 required partial to moderate assistance with mobility, bathing and dressing. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective pain management for 1 of 1 residents experiencing pain (Resident L). Findings include: On 9/3/24 at 2:01 P.M., Resident L's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel, diabetes, intellectual disabilities, and neuropathy. The resident had been hospitalized for a hip fracture due to a fall. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS ) assessment, dated 8/17/24, indicated her cognition could not be assessed due to intellectual disabilities. She had verbal behaviors and behaviors not affecting others 1-3 days of the assessment and when asked, indicated she had pain but was unable to give further details. She required maximal assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's ). Care plans with effective dates, indicated: -8/13/24: Resident had potential for pain related to neuropathy and recent hip fracture. The goal was her pain to be controlled at an acceptable level. Interventions included: assess pain using the 0-10 scale; administer pain medication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective behavior management plan for a resident with a history of alcohol abuse. This resulted in public resident to staff altercations (Resident G) and 5 residents fearing for their safety (Resident P, Resident Q, Resident S, Resident T, and Resident U). Findings include: On 7/16/24 at 11:06 A.M., during an initial tour of the southwest hallway, a middle aged appearing male resident (Resident G) was observed seated in a wheelchair at the nurses station, speaking with a staff member. His speech was slightly slurred and rapid. Seated behind the resident, approximately 5 feet away, sat a female resident in a wheelchair with her feet resting on foot pedals. She was observed to have a grimace on her face, furrowed eyebrows, and nervous expression as she stared at the back of Resident G's wheelchair. She shifted her weight several times as if trying to move her wheelchair herself. Residents seated in the adjacent lounge area, indicated there had been issues with Resident G and they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dementia care and services was provided to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia care (Resident E). Findings include: A complaint reported to the Indiana Department of Health, alleged residents who resided on the memory care unit at the facility were unsafe due to lack of nursing staff, medications not being provided timely, and lack of activities. On 7/17/24 at 11:27 A.M., Resident E's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, delusional disorder, insomnia, major depressive disorder, and diabetes. He had been hospitalized for 2 weeks in May 2024 for increased delusions and physical behaviors. Hospital notes indicated the plan of care was to minimize polypharmacy and provide a structured, secured environment. The resident returned to the facility on 5/20/24 with orders for 2 antidepressant medications and an antipsychotic medication which hadn't been prescribed prior to his hospitalization. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 4/9/24, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident Q). Findings include: A report, submitted to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH), dated 3/26/24, indicated on 3/19/24 at 6:30 a.m., a CNA (Certified Nurse Aid) had used their cell phone to create a video of Resident Q without her permission. The video was shared with several staff members. On 4/2/24 at 2:16 P.M., Resident Q's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, delusional disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 12/19/23, indicated Resident Q had severely impaired cognition and verbal behaviors of yelling out. A care plan, revised on 1/15/24, indicated Resident Q displayed mood issues such as yelling out at staff and calling them derogatory names, delusions, hitting, kicking, and barricading herself. An intervention, dated 3/27/24, was for care to be provided in pairs (2 staff members). In an interview on 4/2/24 at 9:55 A.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a timely report of suspected abusefor 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident Q). Findings include: A report, submitted to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH), dated 3/26/24, indicated on 3/19/24 at 6:30 a.m., CNA 7 (Certified Nurse Aid) had used their cell phone to videotape Resident Q without her permission. The video was shared with several staff members. Refer to F600. In an interview on 4/2/24 at 12:28 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated, on 3/19/24, CNA 5 (Certified Nurse Aid) reported mistreatment of Resident Q by CNA 7 and provided a cell phone recording of the alleged event. CNA 7 was suspended pending investigation and allowed to return to work the following day after the allegation of mistreatment was unsubstantiated. The unauthorized recording of Resident Q, obtained while the resident was being provided pericare, was not reported to IDOH until someone reported to corporate. CNA 5 still had the recording on her phone. CNA 5 had not been suspended pending investigation after sharing the video…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure protection from abuse for residents while an investigation of abuse was conducted for 1 or 3 residents reviewed (Resident Q). Findings include: A report, submitted to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH), dated 3/26/24, indicated on 3/19/24 at 6:30 a.m., a CNA (Certified Nurse Aid) had used their cell phone to record Resident Q without her permission. The recording was shared with several staff members. The incident was not reported on 3/19/24 when it occurred. The involved CNA was not suspended until 6 days later. After 3/19/24, the CNA provided care to residents on 3/21/24, 3/23, and 3/24/24 from 6:30 p.m. until 7 a.m. Refer to F600. During an interivew on 4/2/24 at 12:28 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated, on 3/19/24, CNA 5 (Certified Nurse Aid) reported mistreatment of Resident Q and provided a cell phone recording of the alleged event. The unauthorized recording of Resident Q, obtained while the resident was being provided pericare, was not reported nor was CNA 5 suspended for making the recording.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain minimum staffing levels to ensure safety with 2 staff members to transfer 22 residents who required use of a mechanical lift daily. Findings include: An Indiana Report Form, dated 10/25/23, alleged the facility hadn't enough staff to transfer residents who required a mechanical lift with assistance from 2 staff members. The complainant alleged there was only one staff working on a hall with 31 residents, some who required use of a mechanical lift for transfers. On 11/27/23 at 1:18 P.M., a confidential interview with a resident identified as interviewable, indicated they had to wait to be transferred to and from bed because they needed a mechanical lift with 2 staff members. The facility didn't always have 2 staff on the hall and they would have to wait for a second person from another unit to come and help. On 11/29/23 at 11:17 A.M., during a Resident Council meeting, residents indicated the facility was short staffed, especially on weekends. Several residents present, indicated they required a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an episode of attempted self-harm for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 34). Findings include: On 11/27/23 at 12:12 PM Resident 34 was observed sitting on their bed holding stuffed toys. Resident 34 did not respond to a verbal greeting and avoided eye contact. There was no call light in Resident 34's room. Resident 34's record was reviewed on 11/28/23 at 2:27 PM. Diagnoses included dementia with psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder, delusional disorder, anxiety, stroke with right side paralysis and aphasia (inability to speak). Resident 34's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 34 was unable to respond. A progress note dated 5/31/23at 10:39 PM indicated Resident 34 had removed the bed sheets and had wrapped the alarm cord around her head and arm. Resident 34's current care plan entry dated 6/1/23 and revised on 11/21/23 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an episode of attempted self-harm for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 34). Findings include: On 11/27/23 at 12:12 PM Resident 34 was observed sitting on their bed holding stuffed toys. Resident 34 did not respond to a verbal greeting and avoided eye contact. There was no call light in Resident 34's room. Resident 34's record was reviewed on 11/28/23 at 2:27 PM. Diagnoses included dementia with psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder, delusional disorder, anxiety, stroke with right side paralysis and aphasia (inability to speak). Resident 34's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 34 was unable to respond. A progress note dated 5/31/23 at 10:39 PM indicated Resident 34 had removed the bed sheets and had wrapped the alarm cord around her head and arm. A progress note dated 6/1/23 at 11:09 AM indicated Social Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure services were provided for communication deficits and activities of daily living for 2 of 2 residents reviewed. (Resident 34, Resident 16). Findings include: 1. On 11/27/23 at 12:12 AM Resident 34 was observed sitting on their bed holding stuffed toys. Resident 34 did not respond to a verbal greeting and avoided eye contact. There was no call light in Resident 34's room. Resident 34's record was reviewed on 11/28/23 at 2:27 PM. Diagnoses included dementia with psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder, delusional disorder, anxiety, stroke with right side paralysis and aphasia (inability to speak). Resident 34's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 34 did not speak, was rarely or never understood. Resident 34's current care plan entry dated 7/30/23 and revised on 9/22/23 indicated the resident would communicate by yelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow care planned interventions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with pressure ulcers (Resident 35). Findings include: On 11/27/23 at 9:53 A.M., Resident 35 was observed lying in bed, covered up with blankets. 2 heel protectors sat on top of her covers at the bottom of the bed. A heel up cushion device sat in a chair next to her bed. On 11/29/23 1:10 P.M., the resident was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room. She wore no heel protectors on her feet and her heels were lying on the the footrest of the chair. On 11/29/23 at 12:56 P.M., Resident 35's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included dementia. She had been receiving hospice services since 8/20/21 for Alzheimer's disease. A care plan, revised 9/10/22, indicated the resident was at risk for skin breakdown related to end of life, incontinence, and decreased mobility. The goal was for the resident to be be provided preventative measures in an attempt to avoid skin breakdown. Interventions included: Heels up cushion while in bed. A care plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow care planned interventions to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 3 and Resident 74). Findings include: 1. On 11/27/23 at 10:10 A.M., Resident 3 was observed lying on her back in bed. The bed was low to the ground but there was no mat on the floor beside her. On 11/27/23 at 2:03 P.M., Resident 3's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke, dementia, and contracture of the left wrist. The resident had resided at the facility for several years and did not walk. An annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 11/17/23, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition. She was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. A care plan, revised on 4/10/23, indicated the resident was at risk for falls due to confusion, and poor positioning and trunk control when seated. The goal was her risk factors would be reduced to avoid significant injury related to falls. Interventions included: 11/21/23-low bed and mat on floor next to bed;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate and identify underlying causes of resident specific behaviors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 34). Findings include: On 11/27/23 at 12:12 AM Resident 34 was observed sitting on their bed holding stuffed toys. Resident 34 did not respond to a verbal greeting and avoided eye contact. There was no call light in Resident 34's room. Resident 34's record was reviewed on 11/28/23 at 2:27 PM. Diagnoses included dementia with psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder, delusional disorder, anxiety, stroke with right side paralysis and aphasia (inability to speak). Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 34's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 34 did not speak and was rarely or never understood. The MDS indicated the resident did not display behaviors of yelling, resistance of care, disrobing, wandering or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Social Services to identify and track abnormal behaviors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 34). Findings include: On 11/27/23 at 12:12 AM Resident 34 was observed sitting on their bed holding stuffed toys. Resident 34 did not respond to a verbal greeting and avoided eye contact. There was no call light in Resident 34's room. Resident 34's record was reviewed on 11/28/23 at 2:27 PM. Diagnoses included dementia with psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder, delusional disorder, anxiety, stroke with right side paralysis and aphasia (inability to speak). Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 34's most recent quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 34 did not speak and was rarely or never understood. The MDS indicated the resident did not display behaviors of yelling, resistance of care, disrobing, wandering or smearing of food and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents was treated with respect and dignity during non-care related interactions (Resident L). Findings include: An Indiana report, dated 8/14/23 at 12:13 p.m., indicated a resident reported an activity aide had shown her inappropriate photographs that were on the aides personal cell phone. On 8/16/23 at 11:58 A.M., Resident L, identified as interviewable, was interviewed. She was observed seated in her wheelchair, wearing her dark purple colored dress and white cap-covering which was indicative of her Amish expression of faith. She was animated, with her voice rising when expressing disbelief, while telling her story. The activity aide had shown her nude photos of herself as well as men she was dating on a dating app. The resident indicated this had occurred while she had been in the activity room working on puzzles approximately 1-2 weeks ago. She reported it, on Monday, 8/14/23 to the Activity Director. Resident L indicated she told the activity aide she hadn't wanted to see that and she could get into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-10-01 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staffing numbers including the facility name, date, facility census, total number and actual hours worked per shift by licensed and unlicensed direct care staff were posted in an area accessible to residents and visitors. for 82 of 82 residents resided in the building. Findings include: During an observation, on 9/25/24 at 1:00 PM, a plastic document holder was observed in the front lobby area next to postings of Resident Rights and names, addresses and phone numbers of state agencies. A set of doors at the end of the lobby were locked with a push- button activator to open the doors leading to the area of the building where residents resided. The doors required a keypad code to be entered to reach the lobby area from the area where the residents resided. An additional door was observed, with a keypad entry and exit code required, which lead to the locked dementia unit. During an interview, on 9/25/24 at 3:29 AM, the Administrator indicated the signs had been recently moved to their current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-01 for 10 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2013 |
| LENON, ISAAC | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/16/2021 |
| THOMAS, MYRAN | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/07/2022 |
| DECOLA, ROBERT | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/16/2019 |
| BERKHOUSE, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/18/2021 |
| DUNKLE, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2019 |
| MILLER'S HEALTH SYSTEMS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2013 |
| THE WATERS OF LAGRANGE SKILLED NURSING FACILITY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $777K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155118. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.