No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Life Care Center Of Michigan City

802 Us Highway 20 East, Michigan City, IN 46360 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (219) 872-7251 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (219) 872-7251 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 78% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3901 Franklin St · (219) 878-6668 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.7 mi
101 W US Highway 20 · (219) 879-9650 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
340 Dunes Plz · (219) 874-2335 · Call to confirm hours
Park
307 Village Rd · (219) 873-1506 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.1%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.0%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.5%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.0%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.7%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.7%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.3%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.2%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.9%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%10.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.011.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.561.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 245 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
91.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.63U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.32hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 91.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.7%CMS range 37.0–49.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.8–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge91.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge91.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge85.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 5.3–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.331.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
46.2%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 90.8 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-08)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate monitoring and interventions implemented for constipation related to a delay in treatment for a resident with no documented bowel movements for over 5 days for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition. (Resident J) Finding includes:Resident J's record was reviewed on 10/28/25 at 9:15 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction (weakness and paralysis following a stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side and epilepsy. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/15/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. She was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Care Plan, dated 10/10/25, indicated the resident was at risk for constipation related to decreased mobility and side effects of medications. Interventions included, but were not limited to, follow facility bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and treatment related to incorrect oxygen flow rate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident E) Finding includes: On 10/27/25 at 1:13 p.m., Resident E was observed lying in her bed. She had a nasal cannula on and oxygen was flowing from the concentrator at 4 liters per minute (lpm). On 10/28/25 at 9:15 a.m., the resident was seated in her room with the nasal cannula on and oxygen flowing at 4 lpm. The resident indicated she was supposed to be on 2 lpm of oxygen. The resident's record was reviewed on 10/27/25 at 1:00 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension and chronic cough. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/14/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and received oxygen. A Physician's Order, dated 4/3/24, indicated oxygen at 2 lpm continuously. During an interview on 10/28/25 at 1:20 p.m., LPN 1 indicated the resident was on 2 lpm of oxygen. She observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean and in good repair related to dirty floors, bed rails, baseboards, and ceiling vents, loose trim on floors and baseboards, and marred walls and doors in 2 of 2 units. (The East and [NAME] Units)Findings include:During the Environmental Tour on 8/7/25 at 1:35 p.m., with the Maintenance Director and Housekeeping Director, the following was observed:1. East Unita. The floor and floor mat in room [ROOM NUMBER] were dirty and sticky. The bed rail was visibly dirty with a brown substance stuck on it. One resident resided in the room. These observations were consistent with observations made on 8/4/25 at 11:19 a.m.2. [NAME] Unita. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the trim on the floor in the doorway to the bathroom and the baseboard were coming off. One resident resided in the room.b. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the paint was chipped on the wall by bed 2 and the floor mat was torn along the edge. The floor tile was dirty along…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had physician's orders for medications and an assessment to self-administer their own medications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 20)Finding includes:During random observations on 8/4/25 at 10:05 a.m., 8/4/25 at 3:00 p.m., and 8/5/25 at 2:20 p.m., a container with 4 bottles of re-wetting eye drops was observed on Resident 20's bedside table. One of the bottles had an expiration date of 12/2017. The resident indicated he used the eye drops regularly and independently. The resident's record was reviewed on 8/5/25 at 2:44 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, lymphoma, and glaucoma.The 7/5/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).The record lacked a self-administration assessment and physician's orders for re-wetting eye drops.During an interview on 8/5/25 at 2:10 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promptly notify the resident's physician of multiple refusals of sliding scale insulin for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. (Resident 4)Finding includes:The record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 8/6/25 at 8:56 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, diabetic neuropathy, heart failure, chronic pain, low back pain, major depressive disorder, chronic migraines, and a history of thrombosis (the formation of a blood clot (thrombus) inside a blood vessel, obstructing the normal flow of blood). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/15/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and received insulin in the last 7 days. The Care Plan, revised on 5/28/25, indicated the resident refused care such as being repositioned, incontinent checks and changes, and skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a wound vacuum and tubing were kept off the floor and treatments were in place for a non-pressure skin area for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin areas, a resident was treated for constipation for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for constipation and a resident with a NG tube was assessed and monitored for complications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice. (Residents 90, 4, and 11)Findings include: 1. During an observation on 8/4/25 at 1:00 p.m., Resident 90 was observed in bed. At that time, the resident had a large bandage over the left knee and it was connected to a wound vacuum (a treatment that used suction to help wounds heal). The wound vacuum and tubing were observed on the floor. The resident was also observed with a pink foam bandage on the back of her right hand with a date of 7/28/25. During an interview with the resident, she indicated she had an allergic reaction while in the hospital from a medication and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine eye care and was seen by an Optometrist for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for vision. (Resident 4) Finding includes:During an interview on 8/4/25 at 10:14 a.m., Resident 4 indicated she needed to see the eye doctor to have another cataract surgery. She had the first one in 1/2025. The record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 8/6/25 at 8:56 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, diabetic neuropathy, heart failure, chronic pain, low back pain, major depressive disorder, chronic migraines, and a history of thrombosis (the formation of a blood clot (thrombus) inside a blood vessel, obstructing the normal flow of blood). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/15/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and had adequate vision with no corrective lens. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received foot care and routine visits with the podiatrist for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for foot care. (Resident 4) Finding includes:During an interview on 8/4/25 at 10:16 a.m., Resident 4 indicated she had told staff she wanted to see a podiatrist at the time of admission. The record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 8/6/25 at 8:56 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, diabetic neuropathy, heart failure, chronic pain, low back pain, major depressive disorder, chronic migraines, and a history of thrombosis (the formation of a blood clot (thrombus) inside a blood vessel, obstructing the normal flow of blood). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/15/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. A signed consent, dated 5/5/25, indicated the resident wished to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychological services were offered for a resident exhibiting signs and symptoms of depression for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for mood and behavior. (Resident 5)Finding includes:During an interview on 8/4/25 at 9:53 a.m., Resident 5 indicated she had some feelings of depression. She indicated she did not receive an antidepressant but she would like to talk to somebody. The resident indicated that she told the Speech Therapist but she didn't know if the therapist told nursing. The record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 8/7/25 at 3:42 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, displaced comminuted fracture of the shaft of the left femur and depression. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/31/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had no mood issues. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 6/30/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and she had little interest or pleasure in doing things and she was also feeling down, depressed, or hopeless 2-6 days during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store over the counter medications and insulin securely in a locked medication cart for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for medication storage. (Residents 42 and 3)Findings include:1. During random observations on 8/4/25 at 10:00 a.m. and 1:13 p.m. and on 8/5/25 at 9:09 a.m. and 1:55 p.m., Resident 42 was observed in her room and in bed. At those times there was an unopened multi-use vial of Insulin on the resident's nightstand with a label of the resident's name on it. On 8/5/25 at 3:41 p.m., the Nurse Trainer entered the resident's room and observed the insulin vial on top of the nightstand and asked the resident if she could remove it. The record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 8/5/25 at 1:57 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure, heart disease, heart failure, dementia without behaviors, and high blood pressure. The 6/20/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making and needed substantial assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented related to a lack of documentation of blisters for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions (Resident 67), and inaccurate meal consumption documentation for a resident who was NPO (nothing by mouth) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice. (Resident 11)Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 8/4/25 at 8:41 a.m., Resident 67's legs were wrapped in gauze. At that time, the resident indicated there used to be blisters on her legs, but she was not sure if they were still there.During an observation of treatment on 8/07/25 at 1:11 p.m., a small, dark, circular discoloration was observed to the resident's left shin. At that time, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated it used to be a blister. She indicated the resident used to have multiple small blisters to both legs, but they had healed. The record for Resident 67 was reviewed on 8/5/25 at 3:07 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, legal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) not followed while assisting a resident who had a Foley catheter to the bathroom and emptying an indwelling Foley catheter during random infection control observations. (Residents 5 and 56)Findings include:1. During a random observation on 8/5/25 at 9:15 a.m., Occupational Therapy Assistant (OTA) 1 was assisting Resident 5 with a toilet transfer. The OTA was wearing gloves but was not wearing an isolation gown. The resident had an indwelling Foley catheter. During a random observation on 8/6/25 at 1:11 p.m., CNA 1 was draining the resident's Foley catheter leg bag. The CNA had donned a pair of gloves, but she was not wearing an isolation gown. The record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 8/7/25 at 3:42 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, displaced comminuted fracture of the shaft of the left femur and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (nerve damage that impaired the bladder's ability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the responsible party was notified of a unwitnessed fall in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 3/31/25 at 10:47 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of the left femur, hypertension (high blood pressure), depression, chronic kidney disease, history of falling and dementia. A Nurse's Note, dated 1/8/25 at 12:25 a.m., indicated Resident B was noted on the floor in her room by the CNA. The resident was assessed and was alert and oriented to situation and self. The resident was noted to have a bruise to the left frontal side of her head with a small bump. The resident had also complained of soreness to her left hip and back. The resident refused pain medication and refused to go to the hospital. A message was left to notify the Nurse Practitioner. A Nurse's Note, dated 1/8/25 at 1:04 a.m., indicated medication was given for pain in the left hip and lower back. A Nurse's Note, dated 1/8/25 at 3:12 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were updated to prevent injury for a resident with multiple falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident D) Finding includes: On 3/31/25 at 12:09 p.m., Resident D was not observed in his room. There was a mattress leaning on the side of the wall, there was a touch pad call light, gym shoes by the bedside, and the bed had two half side rails. Resident D's record was reviewed on 3/31/25 at 1:17 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension (high blood pressure), stroke, and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. The resident required substantial/maximum assistance for bed mobility, transferring and toileting. A Care Plan, last updated on 1/31/25, indicated the resident was at risk for falls related to decreased mobility, weakness, high blood pressure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed at the time of discharge for a resident going home who required home health services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident B). Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 9/11/24 at 9:43 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegia (paralysis of lower body), chronic kidney disease stage 3, and high blood pressure. The Discharge Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 9/1/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. He was totally dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, and transfers. He had an indwelling catheter and an ostomy (an artificial opening). He was taking antipsychotic, antidepressant, and anticoagulant medications. Resident B's Care Plans upon discharge included, but were not limited to, the resident would be long term care, had an ostomy, required extensive assistance for his activities of daily living (ADL) tasks for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, had an indwelling Foley (urinary)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was an adequate indication for use of a scheduled antifungal powder for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 9/11/24 at 9:43 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegia (paralysis of lower body), chronic kidney disease stage 3, and high blood pressure. The Discharge Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 9/1/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. He was totally dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, and transfers. A Physician's Order, dated 7/16/24, indicated nystatin external powder (antifungal powder) 100,000 unit/gram, apply to right and left skin folds topically every shift for skin irritation. The July and August 2024 Medication and Treatment Administration Record indicated the nystatin powder was administered three times each day to the groin area. A Weekly Skin Assessment was completed on 7/20, 7/27, 8/3, 8/10, 8/17, 8/24, and 8/31/24. There were no skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the assistive devices needed to maintain hearing related to hearing aids not administered to a resident as per the physician's order for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for vision/hearing. (Resident 4) Finding includes: On 6/11/24 at 11:48 a.m., Resident 4 was observed sitting in the dining area with other residents. The resident kept saying huh when other people were talking. The resident did not have hearing aids observed to either ear. On 6/11/24 at 3:08 p.m., Resident 4 was sitting in a wheelchair in his room. The resident indicated he could not hear the questions being asked. The resident did not have hearing aids observed to either ear and was unaware where his hearing aids were. Record review for Resident 4 was completed on 6/11/24 at 3:11 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to coronary artery disease, heart failure, and hypertension. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/26/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food consumption logs were completed for residents with a history of weight loss for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 59, 14, and 42) Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident 59 was completed on 6/12/24 at 3:11 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, dementia, and failure to thrive. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/13/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident required a substantial maximal assistance with eating. A Care Plan, dated 1/11/24, indicated the resident had unplanned/unexpected weight loss related to poor food intake. Interventions included to alert the dietician when consumption was poor for more than 48 hours and to record food intake at each meal. The resident weighed 109 pounds on 11/30/23. A weight obtained on 6/7/24 indicated the resident weighed 97 pounds, which was a 11.01 % (percent) weight loss. The Task Meal Consumption Logs were documented with percentage of meals eaten. The last 30 days lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was at the correct flow rate for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen use. (Residents 42 and 48) Findings include: 1. On 6/10/24 at 11:25 a.m., Resident 42 was observed lying in bed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula. The oxygen flow rate was set under 2 liters. On 6/10/24 at 12:04 p.m., the resident's oxygen was in place and the flow rate was set under 2 liters. On 6/11/24 at 11:59 a.m., the resident was observed lying in bed and oxygen was in place via nasal cannula. The flow rate was set just under 2 liters. On 6/11/24 at 3:36 p.m., the resident was observed asleep in bed. Oxygen was in place and the flow rate was set below 2 liters. The record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 6/10/24 at 12:19 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), dementia, depression, muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, anxiety, and left shoulder fracture. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/29/24, indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-02 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had an assessment and Physician's Orders to self-administer their own medications, for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents C, F, G and H) Findings includes 1. During a random observation on 4/1/24 at 1:37 p.m., Resident C was observed in bed and awake. The resident was confused and not oriented to time and place. At that time, there was a tube of Bacitracin ointment on the dresser and 1 over the counter bottle of Genteal tears eye solution. The bottle of eye drops was located on a high top dresser and completely out of reach for the resident. During a random observation, on 4/2/24 at 8:25 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. At that time, the bottle of eye drops was still located on the high top dresser and out of reach for the resident. The record for Resident C was reviewed on 4/1/24 at 3:20 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, contusion right lower leg and foot,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was sent to the hospital in a timely manner, related to complaints of increased pain and leg swelling, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility also failed to ensure treatments were completed for diabetic ulcers and an assessment was completed for new non-pressure wounds to the toes, for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related. (Residents D, B, C, and F) Findings include: 1. The closed record for Resident D was reviewed on [DATE] at 1:04 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, history of falling, metabolic encephalopathy (an infection that causes brain damage), and osteomyelitis (bone infection). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making and dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. A Care Plan, dated [DATE], indicated the resident required ADL (activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Physician was notified in a timely manner of increased pain and leg swelling, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident D) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident D was reviewed on 4/1/24 at 1:04 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, history of falling, metabolic encephalopathy (an infection that causes brain damage), and osteomyelitis (bone infection). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/22/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making and dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. An Event Note, dated 3/14/24 at 3:00 p.m., indicated the CNA asked LPN 1 to look at the resident's right leg. The resident's leg was assessed and their left leg was observed to be pressing against the right leg. An indentation from the left leg was visible on the right leg. The right leg had bruising and a stage one area to the right leg. The Nurse Practitioner (NP), Director of Nursing (DON), and the resident's spouse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided in the shower for a resident who was leaning in their shower chair, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident D) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident D was reviewed on 4/1/24 at 1:04 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, history of falling, metabolic encephalopathy (an infection that causes brain damage), and osteomyelitis (bone infection). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/22/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making and dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. A Care Plan, dated 1/23/24, indicated the resident required ADL (activities of daily living) assistance and therapy services to maintain or attain their highest level of function. Interventions included, but were not limited to, extensive assist of 2 to complete transfers. Nurses' Notes, dated 2/11/24 at 10:05 p.m., indicated the CNA notified the writer the resident was on the floor in the shower room. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure skin tears and areas of bruising were assessed, monitored, and treatments were completed as ordered for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for anticoagulant (a blood thinner) medication side effects. The facility also failed to ensure an edema glove was in use as ordered for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for edema and treatment was completed timely for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for a change in condition. (Residents 1, 74, 181, 59, and 384) Findings include: 1. On 4/24/23 at 1:46 p.m., Resident 1 was observed in her room in bed. She did not have an edema glove to her right hand. On 4/26/23 at 9:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m., and 1:40 p.m., the resident's edema glove to the right hand was not in use. On 4/27/23 at 9:10 a.m., the resident's edema glove to the right hand was not in use. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 4/26/23 at 1:28 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set at the correct flow rate and positioned correctly for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Residents 1, 132, 59, 69, and 37) Findings include: 1. On 4/24/23 at 11:36 a.m. and 1:46 p.m., Resident 1 was observed in her room in bed. Her nasal cannula was not in her nares and her oxygen concentrator was set at 2 liters. On 4/25/23 at 2:09 p.m., the resident's oxygen concentrator was set at below 2 liters. At 3:13 p.m., the resident's oxygen prongs were not in both nares. The oxygen concentrator remained below 2 liters. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 4/26/23 at 1:28 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, profound intellectual disabilities, and disorder of the nose and nasal sinuses. The 3/27/23 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making and she was receiving oxygen while a resident of the facility. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen related to two dishes of food sitting open and not covered on the top of the stove and an accumulation of grease and dried food spillage in and around the stove in 1 of 1 kitchen observed. (Main Kitchen). This had the potential to affect 87 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 4/24/23 at 8:58 a.m. with the Food Service Manager the following was observed: a. Two dishes filled with green beans, carrots and corn were opened and not covered on top of the stove. b. There was accumulation of grease on the stove and on the back splash. c. Inside the oven was a large amount of burnt substances with aluminum foil scattered on the bottom of the oven. d. There was a large accumulation of grease and dry food spillage inside the convection oven. e. There was an accumulation of grease and dust in the slats of the oven hood. f. The pipes in the kitchen had a buildup of grease and dust next to the stove right by the stove top. Interview with the Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen area was clean and in good repair related to dirty floors, cabinets, pipes and walls in 1 of 1 kitchens observed. (Main Kitchen) Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 4/24/23 at 8:58 a.m. with the Food Service Manager, the following was observed: a. The floor had a buildup of dirt and debris. b. Dirt was observed on the pipes in kitchen and underneath the dishwasher. c. Dirt was observed underneath the cabinets in the dish room. d. There was an accumulation of dirt and dust on the wall behind the stove. Interview with the Food Service Manager at that time, indicated all the above areas needed to be cleaned. 3.1-19(f)

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had an assessment to self-administer their own medications for 2 random residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents 50 and 74) Findings include: 1. On 4/24/23 at 10:52 a.m., Resident 50 was observed in her room with a nasal spray and an inhaler at her bedside. The record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 4/26/23 at 10:36 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and respiratory failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/30/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Care Plan, dated 5/23/22 and revised on 3/31/23, indicated the resident had a Physician's Order for self-administration of Vicks Vapo Rub, saline nasal spray, sore throat spray, Luden's throat drops, and an inhaler. Interventions included, but were not limited to, assess the resident's ability to safely self-administer medications specified on admission/readmission, quarterly, with a change in medication orders, and with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) related to nail care. (Resident 69) Finding includes: Interview with Resident 69 on 4/24/23 at 10:35 a.m., indicated her toenails were very long and they needed to be cut. The resident had told staff that she needed assistance cutting them, but they had not helped her. The resident's toenails were observed during the interview and were noted to be very long. Resident 69's record was reviewed on 4/26/23 at 1:22 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/28/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. She required extensive assistance with one person physical assist for personal hygiene. Interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing on 4/27/23 at 2:38 p.m., indicated the resident was on the list to be seen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident received 1 to 1 activities at least 3 times a week for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 6) Finding includes: On 4/24/23 at 1:33 p.m. Resident 6 was observed in bed. At that time, the television was on, however, there was no sound and it was trying to connect to the internet. On 4/25/23 at 9:00 a.m., the resident was observed in bed with his eyes closed. There was no television or radio playing. The record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 4/26/23 at 1:45 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pericardial effusion, cerebral hemorrhage, intellectual disabilities, altered mental status, acute kidney failure, and expressive language disorder. The resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 4/17/23 with hospice services. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/21/23, was in progress. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/30/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the treatment and services necessary to promote healing related to treatments not being completed as ordered and pressure reduction devices not being used for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents 1 and 50) Findings include: 1. On 4/28/23 at 10:59 a.m., Resident 1 was observed in her room in bed. Agency LPN 2 used hand sanitizer and donned gloves and proceeded to remove the resident's blanket exposing her feet. Three foam dressings, dated 4/24/23, were observed on the resident's right foot. Three foam dressings on the resident's overbed table, were dated 4/28/23. The LPN indicated she would take care of the resident's dressings and proceeded to remove each dressing one at a time and replace them with the pink foam dressings, dated 4/28. The LPN did not cleanse the wounds with normal saline and Medihoney (a debriding ointment) was not applied. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 4/26/23 at 1:28 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accidents and received supervision with medications related to proper interventions not in place to prevent the resident from falling and not staying with the resident until all of her medications were consumed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 27) Finding includes: On 4/25/23 at 9:00 a.m., Resident 27 was observed lying sideways in bed. At that time, she had on a pair of fuzzy socks, there was nothing on the bottom of them to prevent the resident from falling. Her wheelchair was parked by the bed and there was no dycem on top of the cushion to prevent the resident from sliding out of the wheelchair. There was no floor mat beside her bed. On 4/25/23 at 10:00 a.m., the resident was observed sitting up in her wheelchair, wearing the same fuzzy socks and self-propelling her wheelchair On 4/25/23 at 2:00 p.m., the resident was observed lying sideways in bed, wearing the same pair of fuzzy socks. There was no floor mat on the ground beside the bed, nor was there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status related to meal consumption records not completed for a resident with a history of weight loss for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 74) Finding includes: The record for Resident 74 was reviewed on 4/27/23 at 8:58 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, malignant neoplasm of right bronchus of lung, and emphysema. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/27/23, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. He required supervision with eating and received a therapeutic diet. A Care Plan, dated 3/29/23, indicated the resident was at risk for weight fluctuations related to his current health status. He had the diagnosis of cancer and his body mass index (BMI) was 22. Interventions included, but were not limited to, assistance with meals as needed and diet per order. A Physician's Order, dated 3/23/23, indicated the resident was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were monitored for side effects and effectiveness as well as ensuring Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessments were completed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 47) Finding includes: Resident 47's record was reviewed on 4/25/23 at 1:31 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, anxiety, and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/24/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. She received antidepressant, anti-anxiety, and antipsychotic medications. A Physician's Order, dated 2/17/22, indicated the resident was to receive brexpiprazole (an antipsychotic medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) one time a day. The order was discontinued on 6/12/22. A Physician's Order, dated 6/15/22, indicated the resident was to receive brexpiprazole 0.5 mg one time a day. The order was discontinued on 8/15/22. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors related to the incorrect administration of insulin for 1 of 5 residents observed during medication pass. (Resident 331) Finding includes: During a medication administration observation on 4/28/23 at 10:50 a.m., RN 1 prepared Resident 331's insulin and checked the resident's orders. She dialed the resident's Lispro insulin pen to 2 units. She washed her hands and applied her gloves. She cleaned the resident's right arm and injected the insulin pen into the resident's arm. She had not primed the insulin pen or performed an air shot prior to administering the insulin. Interview with RN 1 on 4/28/23 at 11:04 a.m., indicated she did not know she was supposed to prime the insulin pen prior to administering insulin to the resident. Interview with the DON on 4/28/23 at 11:12 a.m. indicated RN 1 should have primed the insulin pen prior to injecting the resident and she would inservice RN 1. A facility policy titled, Medication Storage and Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored for safety, labeled, and dated for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms observed. (West Wing Medication Storage Room). Finding includes: During a medication storage observation on 4/28/23 at 10:12 a.m., the [NAME] Wing Medication Storage Room was observed with LPN 2. Ativan (2 vials) were found in the refrigerator inside a plastic container. The plastic container did not have a lock on it. The Medication room was locked, however the refrigerator was not locked. Interview Agency LPN 2 and she indicated she thought the plastic zip tie on the container was a lock. 4/28/23 10:18 a.m., the DON indicated the Ativan should have been in a locked box, or the refrigerator should have a lock on it. The pharmacist had told her to put a lock on the refrigerator a while ago. A facility policy titled, Medication Storage and Administration Quick Reference Guide, Medication Cart Security and HIPPA, provided by the DON as current, indicated, . Med storage keys are retained by designated staff. Controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Garden Terrace At Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Hammond-Whiting Care CenterWhiting, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of AndoverAndover, KS 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Cape GirardeauCape Girardeau, MO 1 of 5Life Care Center Of GrayGray, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of HixsonHixson, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Mount VernonMount Vernon, WA 1 of 5Life Care Center Of RenoReno, NV 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Sierra VistaSierra Vista, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center Of The WillowsValparaiso, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of TucsonTucson, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Life Care Center of ElkhornElkhorn, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of Hilton HeadHilton Head Island, SC 1 of 5Life Care Center of OmahaOmaha, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of PlainwellPlainwell, MI 1 of 5Life Care Ctr Of LawrencevilleLawrenceville, GA 1 of 5Rensselaer Care CenterRensselaer, IN 2 of 5Canon Lodge Care CenterCanon City, CO 2 of 5Darcy Hall Of Life CareWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Desert Cove Nursing CenterChandler, AZ 2 of 5Evergreen Nursing HomeAlamosa, CO 2 of 5Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of HoustonHouston, TX 2 of 5Hallmark ManorFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Lane House, TheCrawfordsville, IN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Altamonte SpringsAltamonte Springs, FL 2 of 5Life Care Center Of AthensAthens, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BridgetonBridgeton, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BrookfieldBrookfield, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ColumbiaColumbia, SC 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Federal WayFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of GrandviewGrandview, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of KirklandKirkland, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Merrimack ValleyBillerica, MA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Morgan CountyWartburg, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of PuyallupPuyallup, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Red BankChattanooga, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of South Las VegasLas Vegas, NV

Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ENGELS, ERINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
GENTRY, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2022
STARKEY, TYLERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2020
WAITE, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2020
WHICKER, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2022
FENOUGHTY, DEANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/10/2023
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/12/2025
MICHIGAN CITY MEDICAL INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
AGARWAL, BIKASHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
FLETCHER, TODDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
HENRY, TERRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
LAY, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
PHILLIPS, TERRIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
PRESTON, AUBREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
PRESTON, FORRESTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
SWANKER, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
THURMOND, JOANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
ZIEGLER, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
CROSS, CINDYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/25/2025
HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITALOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/25/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$8.9M
Related-party expense78% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 26%Other / private 16%

This home reported $8.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 78% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$379per resident / day
operating cost
$11,514per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$386per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155344. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next