Green Valley Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 119.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors which resulted in Resident D being hospitalized for hypoglycemia after receiving an anti-diabetic medication without a diagnosis of diabetes for 1 of 3 resident's whose medication regimens were reviewed. Findings include: The record for Resident D was reviewed on 8/21/23 at 10:00 a.m. The resident did not have any diagnoses related to or including diabetes. The record lacked documentation of any blood sugar monitoring orders or blood glucose levels in the last 12 months prior to 5/11/23. The physician's order, dated 5/11/23 at 5:42 p.m., indicated RN 4 input an order for the resident to have glipizide (anti-diabetic medication) 5 mg (milligrams) daily for diabetes. NP (Nurse Practitioner) 3 signed off on the order on 5/12/23 at 12:45 p.m. The order note, dated 6/30/23 at 11:52 a.m., indicated the resident was prescribed Bactrim DS (double strength) tablet 800-160 mg 1 tablet daily for a UTI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment, floors, ceiling vents were clean and in good condition and expired food was disposed of during 3 of 3 kitchen observations. This deficient practice affected 122 of 122 residents who received meals from the kitchen.Findings include:1.During the initial tour of the kitchen with [NAME] 1, on 1/5/26 at 10:00 a.m., the following concerns were observed:There were yellow/brown food particles in the fryer oil with a heavy accumulation of brown food particles on the inside shelf. Cook,1 indicated the fryer was last used the night before.Both stove ovens had cream colored food particles on the inside bottom. The outside doors of the oven and handles were sticky to the touch and had a heavy accumulation of white streaks running down the front doors.Around 3 sides of the fryer there were white and brown sticky streaks.The left side of the convection oven had yellow grease particles on it and felt greasy to the touch.The top and bottom of the convection ovens had brown and white streaks running…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper labeling on 6 of 24 residents receiving insulin during the review of medication storage. (Residents 28, 9, 2, 4, 115 and 23) Findings include: 1. During an observation of the 300 Hall medication cart, on 1/7/26 at 8:41 a.m., the following concerns were identified for Resident 28: a. Resident 28's Lispro (rapid acting insulin) had no pharmacy label with the KwikPen in the medication cart or in the refrigerator. b. Resident 28's Rezvoglar (long-acting insulin) had no pharmacy label with the KwikPen in the medication cart or in the refrigerator. The record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 1/8/26 at 10:08 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, protein-calorie malnutrition, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and anemia. The care plan, dated 12/18/25, indicated the resident had a diabetes mellitus diagnosis and was at risk for abnormal blood sugar readings. The interventions, dated 12/18/25, included, but were not limited to, blood sugar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was applied and the catheter bag drainage valve was kept off of the floor to prevent infection during 2 of 3 observations of care. (Residents 7 and 82) and to ensure glucometers were cleaned per guidelines for infections control when obtaining blood sugar readings for 2 of 2 residents observed. (Residents 32 and 2)Findings include:1. During an observation, on 1/6/26 at 9:38 a.m., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 5 entered Resident 7's room to empty the catheter bag, which was full of light-yellow urine and bulging. The urine was visible in the line leading up to the resident. She emptied the bag four to five times before it was empty. She applied gloves but did not apply a gown for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). There was signage on the entry door indicating the resident was in EBP related to wound and catheter care. The equipment to be worn during care, were indicated on the signage for gloves and a gown. During an interview, on 1/6/26 at 9:41 a.m., Resident 7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of Urinary Tract Infection (UTIs) was provided proper management of the urinary catheter drainage system by maintaining the drainage system with sufficient emptying of the drainage system for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for catheter care. (Resident 7) Findings include:During an observation, on 1/5/26 at 10:01 a.m., Resident 7's catheter bag was full of urine and bulging. Urine was observed leading up the tubing to the resident. The urine was clear light yellow. The floor was sticky when walking on it. During an interview, on 1/6/26 at 9:24 a.m., Resident 7 indicated the catheter bag broke open and the urine was everywhere. The staff had mopped up the urine on the floor today. During an observation, on 1/6/26 at 9:38 a.m., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 5 entered the resident's room to empty the catheter bag which was full of light-yellow urine and bulging. The urine was visible in the line leading up to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of a medication error rate greater than 5 percent for 2 of 24 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 8.33%. (Resident 32 and Resident 2)Findings include:1. During an interview, on 1/7/26 at 11:15 a.m., the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 indicated that she had already checked Resident 32's blood glucose. She indicated the reading was 244 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and after reviewing the physician's order it was determined that the resident would get 4 units of insulin Lispro Injection subcutaneously. During an observation, on 1/7/26 at 11:25 a.m., LPN 3 performed hand hygiene, primed the Lispro Insulin pen with 2 units without the needle intact at the time of priming. The needle was then put on the insulin pen; the LPN went to the resident's room and cleaned the lower right abdomen with alcohol and did not allow it to dry. LPN 3 injected the insulin and left it place for only 4 seconds before retracting the insulin pen. Review of the manufacturer requirements…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of medications for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Resident D)Findings included: The record for Resident D was reviewed, on 8/4/25 at 12:37 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified intellectual disabilities, major depressive disorder, front-temporal neurocognitive disorder, and dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/12/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The review of the incident report, dated 7/27/25, indicated a staff member was suspected of taking narcotic medications from the resident for her personal use. The staff member involved was a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). During an interview on 8/4/25 10:13 a.m., Certified Nurse aide 4 (CNA) indicated that the resident does not show signs of pain most of the time, but does get agitated from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed hold polices were provided to residents/resident representatives ( Resident C, Resident D, Resident F and Resident B) discharged to the hospital for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for transfers/discharges. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 6/4/25 at 11:31 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The progress note, dated 5/26/25 at 1:00 a.m., indicated the resident was very lethargic and the catheter had blood tinged urine in the catheter bag. The physician was notified and a new order was received to send the resident to the hospital for evaluation. The clinical record lacked documentation of the bed hold documentation provided to the resident or the resident's representative at the time of discharge. 2. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 6/4/25 at 2:49 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders were in place for weekly maintenance of nebulizer equipment and failed to ensure nebulizer respiratory assessments were completed prior and after administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/4/24 at 9:54 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the December 2024 medication administration record (MAR) indicated the resident received pulmicort 0.5 mg (milligrams)/2 ml (milliliters). The resident was to received 2 ml, via nebulizer, twice daily. The resident's clinical record lacked documentation of the December weekly replacement of the nebulizer respiratory equipment. Review of the January 2025 MAR indicated the resident received pulmicort 0.5 mg (milligrams)/2 ml (milliliters). The resident received 2 ml, via nebulizer, twice daily upon readmission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff to resident abuse did not occur for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/20/24 at 11:43 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. The incident report, dated 6/24/24 at 11:20 p.m., indicated Resident B was being assisted with toileting needs by CNA 4 when Resident B bit the side of CNA 4's arm. CNA 4 reported she made contact with Resident B's facial area in an attempt to stop the biting process. The written statement from CNA 4, dated 6/25/24 at 11:07 a.m., indicated Resident B was sitting in the dining room eating a snack and had been restless. On 6/24/24 at 11:30 p.m., CNA 4 tried to get the resident up to provide incontinent care but the resident was resistant and held onto the chair arms. CNA 4 waited a couple of minutes and tried again. CNA 4 leaned in and put her hand on the resident's waistline to help her up at that time the resident bit her right inner upper arm. Out of reflex, CNA 4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment and floor was clean and free from grease and food particles for 2 of 3 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 120 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings Include: During an observation of the facility kitchen the following was observed: - The deep fryer had grease and a brown black substance buildup on the fryer baskets, and the top and sides of the fryer. - The gas stove knobs had a grease and food debris buildup. - The cart sitting beside the stove, had a sheet pan sitting on the shelf with a greasy food buildup on the utensils. - The employee sink had a black substance in the sink bowl, and on the front and sides of the sink. - The kitchen floor felt greasy and was slippery. The floor was dirty with grime and food debris build up. There were various items of trash laying on the floor. - Sitting on a table near the dishwasher there was a large bowl with a brown thick substance inside. The substance was up the sides of the bowl and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $13.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 84% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN