Life Care Center Of Rochester
827 W 13th St, Rochester, IN 46975 · Government - County · 108 certified beds · (574) 223-4331 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Nov 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 64% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.3% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.9% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.9% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.8% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.7% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.3% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 39.5% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.3% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 10.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.42 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.94 | 1.44 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.3%CMS range 28.8–54.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.8–18.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.5–14.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.26 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 46.4 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure recipes were followed when preparing pureed meals. This deficient practice had the opportunity to affect 4 of 4 residents who received pureed meals from this kitchen. Finding includes:During an observation of the preparation of a pureed meal, on 9/16/2025 at 11:36 A.M., [NAME] 12 placed 10 scoops of green beans into a blender. She indicated she was making 10 servings of green beans. [NAME] 12 proceeded to add a 1/2 cup of vegetable broth to the blender. She indicated the puree was too watery and then added an additional three scoops of green beans to the blender. A recipe book was not used while [NAME] 12 prepared the pureed meal.During an interview, on 9/16/2025 at 11:51 A.M., [NAME] 12 indicated she should have used a recipe when preparing the pureed meals.On 9/16/2025 a policy was requested regarding the use of a recipe book when preparing pureed meals but one was not provided prior to the survey exit.1.3-20(i)(1)
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. This issue had the potential to affect 57 of 57 residents who received food from this kitchen. Findings include: On 9/15/2025 at 9:40 A.M. a kitchen tour was conducted with [NAME] 8. The following was observed in the walk in cooler:-An opened bag of mozzarella cheese with a use by date of 9/3/2025.-An opened bag of celery not sealed tightly.-An opened carton of grated parmesan cheese with no use by date.During an interview, on 9/15/2025 at 9:50 A.M., [NAME] 8 indicated the expired foods should have been thrown away, foods should have had a use by date and the celery should have been sealed tightly During a follow-up tour of the kitchen on 9/19/2025 at 10:00 A.M. with [NAME] 9 the following was observed in the kitchen drawer:-An ice-cream scoop put away as clean with dried food on it.-A ladle put away as clean with dried food on it.-A whisk put away as clean with dried food on it.During an interview, on 9/19/2025 at 10:05 A.M., [NAME] 9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there were medical symptoms to support the use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 22) Finding includes: The record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 9/16/2025 at 2:25 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to malnutrition, anemia, cirrhosis, diabetes, prostate cancer, and dysphagia. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/28/2025, indicated the resident had clear speech, was able to make their own decisions and was able to make himself understood and understood others, exhibited no behaviors during the assessment period and received an antipsychotic medication.A Physician's Order, dated 8/28/2025, indicated the resident was to received the medication Quetiapine (antipsychotic) 25 mg (milligram) 1 tablet at bedtime and 50 mg 1 tablet at bedtime related to metabolic encephalopathy.A pharmacy recommendation, dated 8/29/2025, indicated Resident 22 received an antipsychotic medication and had no documented diagnoses and/or medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Record Review) was completed after a change in psychiatric diagnoses and medications were made for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR. (Resident 7)Finding includes: The record for Resident 7 was reviewed was on 9/17/2025 at 9:37 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: hypertension, non Alzheimer's dementia, depression and delusional disorder. A Notice of PASRR Level I Screen Outcome, dated June 21, 2022, indicated: Outcome Level 1 Outcome: No Level II Required. If changes occur or new information refutes these findings, a new screen must be submitted.Current Physician Orders, included: Cymbalta (antidepressant) 30 mg (milligram) 1capsule every morning ordered on 9/3/2024.Resident 7 received a new qualifying diagnosis of delusional disorder and subsequent medication changes on 9/4/2024 . A current Care Plan, initiated date unknown, indicated the resident had behavioral episodes related to cognitive deficit and delusional disorder. During an interview, on 9/19/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 3 of 16 residents reviewed for care plans. (Residents 4, 25 & 12)Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 9/15/2025 at 2:41 P.M., Resident 4 indicated he smoked cigarettes. During an observation, on 9/17/2025 at 3:26 P.M., Resident 4 was observed seated in the courtyard smoking with a smoking apron over his body and supervised by an activity staff member. A record review for Resident 4 was completed, on 9/18/2025 at 9:07 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus type 2, chronic kidney disease stage 5 and peripheral vascular disease. An Annual Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/14/2025, indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact. A Smoking Safety Evaluation, dated 8/2/2025, indicated Resident 4 had not demonstrated the ability to safely smoke without supervision. A Care Plan for safe smoking could not be located in the medical record. During an interview, on 9/19/2025 at 12:52 P.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated Resident 4 was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for insulin administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for insulin. (Resident 5)Finding includes:During an interview, on 9/16/2025 at 10:05 A.M., Resident 5 indicated he received insulin injections twice a day. A record review was completed for Resident 5, on 9/16/2025 at 1:35 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus type 2, gout and congestive heart failure. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/22/2025, indicated Resident 5 was cognitively intact and received insulin injections for 7 of 7 days of the look back period. A Physician's Order, dated 6/2/2025 and discontinued on 9/3/2025, indicated insulin glargine solution 100 units per milliliter inject 20 units subcutaneously every morning and at every bedtime. The order included the following parameters: hold the insulin if the blood sugar was less than 150 mm/dL (milligrams per deciliter). The order was revised on 9/3/2025 and indicated to hold the insulin glargine solution if the blood sugar was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a meal or a snack prior to arrival for dialysis visits or after the dialysis treatment was offered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 4)Finding includes:During an interview, on 9/15/2025 at 2:38 P.M., Resident 4 indicated he attended dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays with a transportation time of 6:00 A.M. to the dialysis center. He indicated he was not offered breakfast prior to leaving for dialysis appointments, nor did the facility pack a meal or a snack. A record review for Resident 4 was completed, on 9/18/2025 at 9:07 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus type 2, chronic kidney disease stage 5 and dependance on dialysis. An Annual MDS (minimum data set) assessment, dated 7/14/2025, indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact, needed set-up assistance for eating and received dialysis treatments. A Physician's Order, dated 11/1/2024, indicated Resident 4 was to receive a regular diet with no salt packets and diet condiments with double…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to urinary drainage bag positioning on the floor for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for catheters.(Resident 41) Finding includes:During an observation, on 9/15/2025 at 11:31 A.M., Resident 41's urine drainage bag was on the floor. During an observation, on 9/15/2025 at 12:12 P.M., Resident 41's urine drainage bag was on the floor. During an observation, on 9/16/2025 at 3:58 P.M., Resident 41's urine drainage bag was touching the floor. The record for Resident 41 was reviewed on 9/16/2025 at 11:00 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: diabetes and retention of urine. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 9/4/2025, indicated the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter, and was dependent on staff for toilet hygiene, and required substantial to maximum assist for transfers to bed/chair and received an antibiotic. A current Care Plan, initiated 7/25/2025, indicated the resident had an indwelling foley catheter due to urinary retention and was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an alert and oriented male resident (Resident B) from entering a severely cognitive impaired female resident's (Resident C) room and exposing himself, while kneeling on her bed. Finding includes: A self-reported incident #492, dated 10/12/24, indicated .Male resident found in female resident's room sitting on the foot of the bed with pants around ankles. Female resident lying on her back with her pants down around her ankles. No observation of any physical contact The report indicated Residents B (male) and Resident C (female) were placed on 1:1 observations by facility staff members. Family members, the facility physician and police were notified of the incident. The incident follow-up, dated 10/17/24, indicated Resident B was provided education and Resident C was evaluated by the psychiatric NP, on 10/15/24, with no new orders received. The 1:1 observations were continued for both Residents and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions related to undated and unlabeled foods for 1 of 1 kitchen areas observed (Main kitchen) and serving of plates during meal service. This issue had the potential to affect all 53 residents who resided in the facility and received food from these dietary areas. Findings include: During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 9/16/202 at 9:4 A.M., with the Dietary Manager, the following items were observed: - in the walk-in cooler there was 1 plastic bag with shredded carrots with an expiration date of 9/11/2024 and 1 opened plastic bag with cooked pork chops, undated and unlabeled. -In the dry pantry, there was an unlabeled and opened bag of brownie mix and powdered sugar, and stuffing mix with an expiration date of 10/19/2023. During an interview, on 9/16/2024 at 9:40 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated nothing should be expired in the kitchen and food should have labels and expiration dates. On 9/16/2024, at 12:01 P.M., 33 residents were observed in main dining area. Two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a transfer and discharge form for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 16, 2 and 44) Findings include: 1. A record review for Resident 16 was completed on 9/17/2024 at 1:36 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: paraplegia, pressure ulcer sacral region, schizoaffective disorder, pressure ulcer left hip, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified psychosis and presence of urogenital implants. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/11/2024, indicated Resident 16 was cognitively intact, and he received antipsychotic medication. He had four stage 4 pressure ulcers and had an indwelling bladder catheter. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 3/27/2024 at 1:09 P.M., indicated Resident 16 had exhibited an increase in delusional behavior and a referral was made to the neuropsychiatric hospital. Resident 16 agreed he needed more assistance with psychiatric services due to his mind was racing. Resident 16 was accepted for admission, and his guardian was informed of the pending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold form for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 16, 2, and 44) Findings include: 1. A record review for Resident 16 was completed on 9/17/2024 at 1:36 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: paraplegia, pressure ulcer sacral region, schizoaffective disorder, pressure ulcer left hip, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified psychosis, and presence of urogenital implants. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/11/2024, indicated Resident 16 was cognitively intact, and he received antipsychotic medication. He had four stage 4 pressure ulcers and had an indwelling bladder catheter. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 3/27/2024 at 1:09 P.M., indicated Resident 16 had exhibited an increase in delusional behavior and a referral was made to the neuropsychiatric hospital. Resident 16 agreed he needed more assistance with psychiatric services due to his mind was racing. Resident 16 was accepted for admission, and his guardian was informed of the pending admission. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted timely for 2 of 2 resident assessments reviewed. (Resident 20 & 47) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 47 was reviewed on 9/19/2024. Resident 47 was admitted on [DATE]. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/5/2024, was not locked and transmitted until 9/17/2024, which was over 120 days from the admission MDS assessment that was transmitted. 2. The record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 9/19/2024. Resident 20 was admitted on [DATE]. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 5/12/2024, was not transmitted and accepted until 9/17/2024. The accepted date was over 120 days from the last assessment that was transmitted. During an interview, on 9/19/2024 at 11:20 A.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated the next assessments due were listed on her schedule and that the MDS assessment in question had been transmitted. She indicated she completed the schedule for the MDS assessments and it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans for a resident with edema (Resident 29) and a resident with a history of itching (Resident 34) for 2 of 20 residents reviewed. Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 9/16/2024 at 10:59 A.M., Resident 29 had +1 pitting edema (swelling with a slight indentation in the skin that was barely visible after pressure was applied) to his bilateral lower legs. During an observation, on 9/18/2024 at 10:59 A.M., Resident 29 was noted to have +1 pitting edema to his bilateral lower legs. The record for Resident 29 was reviewed on 9/18/2024 at 10:17 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: chronic venous idiopathic hypertension, congenital malformation syndrome, muscle weakness, sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension and generalized edema. The record lacked a person-centered care plan for the resident's edema. During an interview, on 9/19/2024 at 11:17 A.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated she updated and completed the care plans along…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely notification of a change in condition and provide timely treatment for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization and insulin usage. (Resident 2 and 16) Findings include: 1. During an interview with Resident 2, on 9/17/2024 at 10:34 A.M., she indicated she had been hospitalized four times for pneumonia recently. A record review for Resident 2 was completed on 9/18/2024 at 2:20 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus type 2 with neuropathy, emphysema, atrial fibrillation, and paranoid personality disorder. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/31/2024, indicated Resident 2 was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of respiratory failure and chronic lung disease. The assessment indicated her primary medical categories were debility and cardiorespiratory conditions. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/10/2024 at 8:48 A.M., indicated Resident 2's vital signs included a blood pressure of 96/43, an irregular heart rate of 94-97 beats per minute and oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manor for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. (Resident 36, 44 & 154) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 9/16/2024 at 2:48 P.M., Resident 36's equalizer tubing was dated 8/2020/24 and unbagged. Resident 36's current Physician's Orders included: change and date nebulizer tubing weekly every day shift on Tuesdays. During an interview, on 9/18/2024 at 2:17 P.M., Resident 36 indicated the nebulizer tubing was never in a bag. 2. During an observation, on 9/16/2024 at 10:13 A.M., Resident 44's nebulizer mask was lying on a bedside table with the respiratory bag, dated 8/20/2024, and the tracheostomy suction tip was observed with the outer wrapper, undated, with the suction tip outside the wrapper. During an observation, on 9/16/2024 at 1:58 P.M., the suction tip was missing from the suctioning tubing, but the suctioning tubing was open to air. During an observation, on 9/17/1024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued medications were removed from a medication room and failed to ensure a medication refrigerator was free from a large build up of ice for 1 of 2 medication rooms observed. (Skilled hall medication room) Finding includes: During an observation of the South/Skilled hall medication room, on 9/19/2024 at 9:23 A.M. with RN 2, the following was observed: a plastic bag with the following medications, along with a hand written list, dated 6/12/2024, of the following medications 30 Haldol 5 mg (milligram) tablets (antipsychotic); 70 Hydrocodone 10/325 mg tablets (narcotic); 45 Lorazepam 0.5 mg tablets; liquid Morphine Sulfate (narcotic); 2 Fentanyl 20 mcg (micrograms) and 3 25 mcg patches (narcotic). The freezer section of the medication refrigerator had a large build up of ice. During an interview, on 9/19/2024 at 9:25 A.M., RN 2 indicated the medications that had been discontinued ahsould have been desgtroyed and the medication refrigerator should not have had an ice build up. On 9/19/2024 at 10:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff change gloves and complete hand hygiene when providing perineal care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for incontinence needs. (Resident 7) Finding includes: During an observation on, 9/17/2024 at 9:06 A.M., CNA 3 was observed to provide incontinence care for Resident 7. She donned gloves and removed the dirty brief from the resident. CNA 3 put the dirty brief and the dirty wipes she had used on the floor mat next to the resident. With her dirty gloves still on, she went into the bathroom to obtain a trash bag. She placed the wet brief and the wipes into the trash bag. CNA 3 then went to the closet and got a pair of clean pants without changing her contaminated gloves. CNA 3 then put the residents pants on, and repositioned the resident on the floor mat. CNA 3 rubbed the residents back and then moved a pillow under her head. During an interview, on 9/17/2024 at 9:13 A.M., CNA 3 indicated she should have removed her gloves and washed her hands after cleaning the resident's perineal area. On 9/19/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for 54 of 54 residents who consumed food in the facility. Finding includes: During an observation of the noon meal service in the kitchen and dining and resident halls, conducted on 2/19/2024 between 11:30 A.M. - 12:55 P.M., the following was observed: Cook 4 utilized a 3 ounce scoop to serve all the residents Dijon potatoes, except for two residents receiving pureed food. Cook 4 served two residents a pureed diet. There were only pureed hamburger steak and gravy and pureed Dijon potatoes on the plate. In addition, the two residents received a container of chocolate ice cream and beverages. The residents did not receive a dinner roll or a vegetable. Cook 4 served eight residents a mechanical soft diet, but they did not receive any dinner roll. Review of the facility menu for the day, provided by the Food Service Supervisor on 2/19/2024 at 1:00 P.M., indicated staff should have utilized a #8 (4 ounce) scoop for the Dijon potatoes for all residents, a #16 (2 ounce scoop) for pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment was maintained in 1 of 4 halls observed for environment. (Central Hall) Findings include: During an initial tour, on 2/19/2024 from 9:20 A.M. to 9:34 A.M., the following items were observed on the Central Hall: - room [ROOM NUMBER] had brown and yellow stains in the bathroom with a strong urine smell. - Rooms 203-204's shared bathroom had stained flooring, and a strong urine smell. - room [ROOM NUMBER]-212's shared bathroom had stained flooring with a slimy black substance along the wooden cove wall base. The wooden cove wall base had black stains. A liquid substance was seen around the toilet to the cove wall base. The drywall above the cove wall base was wavy in appearance. - Rooms 216-217's shared bathroom had stained flooring, debris on floor and a strong urine odor. - Rooms 220-221's shared bathroom had stained flooring, and odor of urine. - Rooms 222-223's shared bathroom had stained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident B) Finding includes: A Reportable Incident, dated 10/5/2023, indicated .Description added- 10/5/2023 Allegation of fraudulent use of a debit card Immediate Action Taken- Staff member suspended, law enforcement notified. MD and family aware. Family canceled debit card. Preventative Measures Taken: Type of preventative measures added: 10/5/2023 Investigation initiated. Employee suspended pending investigation. Interviews being conducted with all residents for any concerns. Abuse inservice started A 5-day Follow up, dated 10/11/2023, indicated . Investigation was initiated by Executive Director into [Name of Resident] family's concern with unauthorized online activity on his back account with [Name of Bank]. Resident is his own responsible party with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15- cognition intact. The Executive Director did speak with Deputy [Name of Deputy] during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a State agency of an attempted suicide for 1 of 4 reportable incidents reviewed. (Resident B) Finding includes: A clinical record review was completed on 11/15/2023 at 8:50 A.M. Resident B was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included, but were not limited to: hemiplegia, hemiparesis following cerebral infarct, epilepsy, anxiety, and psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. An admission Note, dated 6/16/2023, from (Name of hospital) indicated Resident B was seen in ER (Emergency Room) and admitted because resident threatened to kill himself by wrapping a ligature around his neck. On arrival to emergency department, he denied any suicidality. A care plan, dated 6/23/2023, indicated the resident used antidepressant medication r/t (related to) depression and was at risk of adverse reactions. Interventions included but were not limited to: Observe for and report PRN adverse reactions to antidepressant therapy; suicidal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for reporting laboratory results timely, and providing oral medications as prescribed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident D) Finding includes: A record review was completed, on 11/16/2023 at 8:30 A.M. Resident D had intact cognition and was his own Power of Attorney (POA). Resident D's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Psoriasis, latent tuberculosis, and Type 1 diabetes mellitus. A Physician's order, dated 5/12/2023, indicated to obtain the following labs: comprehensive metabolic panel, complete blood count with differential, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and QuantiFERON Gold test on the next lab day. A Health Status Note, dated 5/25/2023 at 3:52 P.M., indicated the nurse had called [Name of Hospital Lab] to inquire about Resident D's CBC, CMP, Quantiferon Gold, Hepatitis A, B, and C lab results. It was at that time the nurse was informed that the labs would be drawn the next day on the normal lab draw day at the facility. A Health Status Note, dated 5/26/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to act on a residents' statements of wanting to die, and failed to ensure environmental hazards were removed from a resident's room after a suicide attempt for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for accidents. (Resident 2) Finding includes: A clinical record review was completed on 11/15/2023 at 8:50 A.M. Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included, but were not limited to: hemiplegia, hemiparesis following cerebral infarct, epilepsy, anxiety, and psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. An admission Note, dated 6/16/2023, from (name of hospital) indicated Resident 2 was seen in ER (Emergency Room) and admitted because resident threatened to kill himself by wrapping a ligature around his neck. On arrival to emergency department, he denied any suicidality. A PASSAR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level II outcome, dated 6/21/2023, indicated .we learned you were admitted to the hospital 6/16/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a positive QuantiFERON Gold test (Tuberculosis skin test) to the Indiana Department of Health for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for reportable diseases. (Resident D) Finding includes: A Health Status Note, dated 5//31/2023, indicated the lab called with a positive Tuberculosis (TB). NP (Nurse Practitioner) at facility and made aware. Resident D indicated, he had a chest X-ray for this situation in April 2023, and voiced several years ago having a positive PPD (Purified Protein Derivative) then having a chest X-ray done resulting in a negative result. A Health Status Note, dated 6/2/2023, indicated a Chest X-ray was required related to a positive TB result. A Health Status Note, dated 6/3/2023, indicated: Chest X-ray results received. No tuberculosis seen. NP notified. A Progress Note, dated 6/7/2023, from the Dermatologist indicated that Resident D had a positive tuberculosis skin test and was referred to Infectious Disease for treatment of tuberculosis. An Infectious Disease Progress Note, dated 9/7/2023, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a cleanly kitchen environment with proper sanitation for 1 of 1 kitchens. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 55 of 55 residents who ate their meals in the kitchen. Findings include: On 6/15/2023 at 7:52 A.M., during the initial tour of the kitchen, the following was observed: - A bottle of 409 spray cleaner with Lawry's seasoning salt and a bucket of puree bread mix was observed on the bottom shelf of a three-tiered cart by the steam table. - The stovetop had food debris on top and three of the six wells had significant debris. The outside oven, convection oven, and knife holder had food debris visible. - The stainless-steel storage drawers with ladles, spoons, and spatulas in the first drawer, scoops in the second drawer, and whisks, large utensils and miscellaneous in the third drawer, had visible rust in the drawers. There were no coverings in the drawers. - A stainless steel six-drawer counter containing paper products of lids, souffle cups, bowl lids, condiment cups, cupcake liners, hand mixer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a functional, sanitary and comfortable environment was maintained in 2 of 4 halls observed for environment.(South Hall and Central Hall) Findings include: During an environmental tour, on 6/22/2023 at 11:35 A.M., with the Maintenance Director the following items were observed on the South Hall: - room [ROOM NUMBER] The entry room door had gouged unpainted areas. Dark brown spots were on the floor by bed 1. A headboard was off the bed. the bathroom doors were scratched and had missing paint, the floor was stained and had wet floor tiles under the toilet with a strong urine smell. - room [ROOM NUMBER] had gouged doors, walls, floors with black marks in the entrance to the room. - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s entry door had gouges and missing paint. - room [ROOM NUMBER] the doors to the room and the bathroom had gouges with missing paint. The floor in the bathroom had black marks along the bathroom entrance. - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s entry door…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to prevent a resident's right to be free from mental and physical abuse for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. ( Resident 53 and 12) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 6/15/2023 at 12:27 P.M., employee 4 indicated she had been assigned to 1:1 care for a combative resident, Resident 53, and staff had been threatening the resident. Employee 4 indicated the aides and nurses were threatening. Employee 4 indicated, when the resident would try to go behind the nurses' station to get food, the staff would say do you want me to get the lotion? Employee 4 indicated this is a known trigger for him, and he would do anything to not have lotion applied to him, I believe he had sensory issues. When getting report, I was told if he doesn't listen threaten him with lotion. There was a chair with lotion outside his door in case someone needed to grab the lotion and show him to get him to cooperate. During an interview, on 6/15/2023 at 3:00 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care plan meetings were held timely for 1 of 20 residents reviewed for care plan meetings. (Resident 33) Finding includes: During an initial interview with Resident 33 on 6/15/2023 at 12:09 P.M., she indicated that she was unsure if care plan meetings had occurred. She indicated her granddaughter worked at the facility. On 6/19/2023 a clinical record review was completed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Diabetes Mellitus type 2, chronic kidney disease, and hearing loss. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment on 5/31/2023, indicated Resident 33 was cognitively intact. A review of the Progress Notes indicated no entries for care plan meetings were documented. There were no documents in the electronic medical record that indicated a care plan meeting had occurred in the past year. During an interview on 6/20/2023 at 10:27 A.M., the Social Service Director indicated that a progress note would be placed when the care plan meeting occurred, and she had a binder that the care plan meeting notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order had been followed for a resident who used a pacemaker monitoring device for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for a heart device. (Resident 11) Finding includes: During an interview, on 6/19/2023 at 10:08 A.M., Resident 11's daughter indicated the staff didn't plug in the pacemaker monitoring device that resident 11's Cardiologist supplied to transmit data from the pacemaker. A record review, was completed on 6/19/2023 at 2:30 P.M. Diagnoses included, but not limited to: heart failure, unspecified atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. A physician's order, dated 3/31/2023, indicated to make sure pacemaker monitoring device is plugged in and functioning every shift. A care plan, dated 9/20/2022 and current through 6/21/2023, indicated Resident 11 had a pacemaker related to heart failure and atrial fibrillation and is at risk for mechanical failure. Interventions included, but were not limited to: nursing staff should check pacemaker monitoring device to ensure it is working properly, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a resident from developing 2 new deep tissue injuries in 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 25) Finding includes: During an observation, on 6/17/2023 at 9:53 A.M., Resident 25 was observed lying in bed with pressure relieving boots at the end of the bed. A record review was completed on 6/20/2023 at 5:34 A.M. Resident 25's diagnoses included, but were not limited to heart failure, anxiety, depression, diabetes, dementia, psychotic disorder, and Schizophrenia. An Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/31/2023, indicated the resident had hallucinations and delusions. Required extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and dressing and supervision of 1 staff for eating and had no pressure ulcers. Current physician orders for Resident 25 included: apply skin prep to bilateral heels every shift, float heels while in bed every shift for preventative. Weekly skin assessment: complete skin integrity data collection tool every Saturday. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent in using a pacemaker monitoring device for 1 of 1 residents reviewed who required mechanical device monitoring. (Resident 11) Finding includes: During an interview, on 6/19/2023 at 10:08 A.M., Resident 11's daughter indicated the staff didn't plug in the pacemaker monitoring device the Cardiologist supplied to transmit data from the pacemaker. A record review, completed on 6/19/2023 at 2:30 P.M. Resident 11's diagnoses included, but not limited to, heart failure, unspecified atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. A physician's order, dated 3/31/2023, indicated to make sure pacemaker monitoring device is plugged in and functioning every shift. A care plan, dated 9/20/2022 and current through 6/21/23, indicated Resident 11 had a pacemaker related to heart failure and atrial fibrillation and is at risk for mechanical failure. Interventions included but were not limited to nursing staff should check pacemaker monitoring device to ensure it is working properly, dated 3/31/2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were free from loose pills, failed to date medication when opened and failed to ensure the freezer section of a medication refrigerator was free from ice buildup in 3 of 3 medication storage areas observed. (Central Hall medication cart, Skilled Hall medication cart and South Hall Medication room) Findings include: 1. During a medication storage audit, on 6/17/2023 at 10:45 A.M., with LPN 20 on the Central East medication cart, the following was observed: 5 loose pills and 3 pieces of a white pill were observed in two of the med cart drawers. During an interview, on 6/17/2023 at 10:46 A.M., LPN 20 indicated the loose pills should not be in the cart. 2. During a medication storage audit, on 6/17/2023 at 10:50 A.M., with LPN 20 on the Central Hall medication cart, the following was observed: - A packaged Loperamide ( anit-diarrhea) pill in the drawer and an opened and undated bottle of Lactulose (laxative and ammonia reducer). During an interview, on 6/17/2023 at 11:00 A.M., LPN 20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENGELS, ERIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2018 |
| GENTRY, MARK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 01/12/2022 |
| STARKEY, TYLER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2020 |
| WAITE, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2020 |
| WHICKER, TIMOTHY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 01/12/2022 |
| FENOUGHTY, DEANNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/10/2023 |
| LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/14/2025 |
| ROCHESTER MEDICAL INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2018 |
| FLETCHER, TODD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2018 |
| HENRY, TERRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2018 |
| LAY, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2018 |
| PRESTON, AUBREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/06/2025 |
| PRESTON, FORREST | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2018 |
| SHAFER, SHAUNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| SWANKER, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2018 |
| THURMOND, JOAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2018 |
| VAN DEN DRIESSCHE, THOMAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO DATE PROVIDED |
| ZIEGLER, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2018 |
| HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/27/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 64% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155379. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.