Heritage Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 79.2 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.24 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.40 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were free from theft of an employee for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected on 2/10/2026, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Findings include:During an interview, on 2/26/26 at 1:10 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated, on the morning of 2/3/26, RN 2 informed her Resident B was missing a narcotic medication. RN 2 had completed a narcotic count with RN 3, on 2/2/26 at 10:00 p.m., and Resident B had two (2) narcotic cards for oxycodone (a medication used for pain). The next morning at 6:00 a.m., RN 2 returned to the facility for another shift and realized Resident B no longer had two (2) medication cards. RN 3 had indicated to RN 2 that Resident B had been given pain medication during the night, but RN 3 was not aware of a missing narcotic card. RN 3 then left the facility. The DON then reviewed the medication card with RN 2 and found the medication card and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled with the date received, the reach-in refrigerator was maintained at a safe temperature, and temperature logs were up to date. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 68 of 69 residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings include:1. During the initial kitchen tour with [NAME] 2, on 7/30/25 at 10:21 a.m., the following pre-packaged food items were found to be not labeled with the date received:a. six (6) packages of gravy mixb. three (3) containers of cream of wheatc. eight (8) bags of brown sugard. four (4) packages of brownie mixe. one can of sauerkrautf. one can of peasg. one can of marinara sauceh. one can of cheddar cheese sauce During an interview, on 7/30/25 at 10:43 a.m., [NAME] 2 indicated he dated items with the date received when he put away new food items and then labeled them with the date opened when the item was opened.During an interview, on 7/31/25 at 9:58 a.m., the Dietary Manager indicated the pre-packaged food items should have been labeled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared according to the recipe to ensure the nutritive value, flavor, and appearance were conserved for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for a pureed diet.Findings include:During an observation, on 7/30/25 at 10:48 a.m., [NAME] 2 was observed to add 5 cooked and seasoned hamburger patties to a food processor. He added an unmeasured amount of water, turned on the processor, and mixed until a pudding consistency was obtained. He did not refer to a recipe during the observation.During an interview, on 7/30/25 at 10:48 a.m., [NAME] 2 indicated he was unsure if there was a recipe for purees. He did not know where it was and thought it may have been in with the regular recipes. He usually thinned things with broth or water. He indicated he had already prepared the peas by adding 5 servings of peas to the blender and used milk to thin the peas to get the desired consistency.During an interview, on 7/31/25 at 9:30 a.m., the Dietary Manager indicated the puree recipes were stored in the regular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility and resident rooms were maintained for 8 of 33 rooms reviewed for environment. (room [ROOM NUMBER], 16, 23, 18, 21, 32, 36, 103).Findings include: During an observation, on 7/30/25 beginning at 12:21 p.m., the following were observed.1. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall under the window had a large area with no paint. 2. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall had paint peeled off under the window and on the right side by the bathroom door.3. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall had black scuff marks and missing paint on the lower portion of the wall.4. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the bottom of the door had black scuff marks.5. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the lower part of the door had scuff marks and chipped paint on the door trim.6. The eye washing station door trim had peeling paint.7. The soiled utility room door trim had peeling paint.8. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the door had chipped paint and scuff marks on the trim.9. In room [ROOM NUMBER],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and resident's representative received notification in writing of the facility's bed hold policy and the reason for the resident's transfer and discharge to the hospital for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 3) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 8/1/25 at 11:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit and gastrostomy. A nursing progress note, dated 7/28/25 at 10:20 a.m., indicated the hospital called and informed the facility Resident 3 was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with aspiration pneumonia.There was no documentation in the electronic medical record to indicate the resident and resident's representative was provided information in writing regarding the reason for the resident's transfer to the hospital and the facility's bed hold policy. During an interview, on 8/1/25 at 2:27 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level I was completed on or prior to admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 10)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 8/1/25 at 2:56 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, mild intellectual disabilities, dementia, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and bipolar disorder. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A physician's order, dated 1/15/25, indicated to administer duloxetine (an antidepressant medication) 30 milligrams (mg) once a day. An initial PASARR Level I was not completed until 6/26/25.During an interview, on 8/5/25 at 11:30 a.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated the PASARR was not completed in the correct time frame. A current facility policy, titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), dated 10/2022 and received by the ED on 8/5/25 at 1:03 p.m., indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed related to medications hold parameters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 5)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 8/1/25 at 9:52 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, presence of a coronary angioplasty implant and graft, and occlusion and stenosis of the carotid artery.A care plan, dated 6/6/19, indicated Resident 5 had altered cardiovascular status related to coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and a history of myocardial infarction. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered. A physician's order, dated 4/15/25, indicated to administer carvedilol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure) 6.25 milligram (mg) by mouth twice a day and to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure less than 100 or a heart rate less than 60.A physician's order, dated 5/23/25, indicated to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure smoking evaluations were completed quarterly to evaluate the resident's capabilities and deficits for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accident hazards. (Resident 23) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 8/1/25 at 2:05 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, right above the knee amputation, hypertension, and vascular dementia.A care plan, dated 4/13/23, indicated the resident was non-compliant with the smoking policy, smoked in his room and/or pocketed his cigarette butts. Interventions included, but were not limited to, instruct Resident 23 of the smoking risks and the facility policy on smoking and to make certain cigarette butts were disposed of properly in cigarette butt receptacle.The electronic medical record did not contain smoking safety evaluations for 2024. The last documented smoking evaluation was 1/2023.A quarterly smoking safety evaluation was completed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0560 — isolated
  Protect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who did not experience a change in payor source was given the choice/opportunity to remain in his room for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for room transfers. (Resident C) Findings includes: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 9/10/24 at 2:10 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic brain injury, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility and spastic hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. The resident was admitted to the facility in room [ROOM NUMBER] during his rehabilitation therapy timeframe. When the resident's therapy was competed, the resident was moved to another room without giving him the option to remain in his current room. The new room the resident was provided, did not provide the resident with an adequate bathroom and space for living.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications administered orally were separated from topical medications and eye drops, to store cleaning supplies separately from medications, correctly label OTC (over the counter) medications, date opened medications, and routinely dispose of medications after the date of expiration for 4 of 4 medication carts reviewed. (medication cart 1, medication cart 2, medication cart 3, and medication cart 4) Findings include: During a medication cart observation with Qualified Medical Assistant (QMA) 6, on [DATE] at 11:06 a.m., medication cart 1 was observed to have the following: a. The top right drawer had two medication cups containing one pill in each cup not labeled with the resident's names or with the medication name. b. The bottom right drawer had an unlabeled nebulizer machine (a device which turned liquid medication into a mist to be inhaled into the lungs through a mask or mouthpiece) c. The top left drawer had Smooth Nighttime…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 70% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN