Lexington House

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 106.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed in order to meet the nutritional needs of residents who required a puree diet. The facility failed to follow the established recipes to ensure the nutritional adequacy of the meal for all 18 residents who received a puree diet.Findings:Review of a facility policy on 05/11/2026 at 3:15 p.m. titled, Standardized Recipes with a review date of 05/2023 revealed the following in part . Standardized recipes are used in preparation of food of control of quality, quantity, and uniformity of product. 5. The director of food and nutrition services requires the food and nutrition service staff to follow the standardized recipes. Review of the facility's standardized recipe for puree steamed rice revealed the following in part .Preparation for rice according to regular recipe: 20 servings, 1 1/4 cups 3 tablespoons of whole milk and 3/4 cups of soft margarine. Place food in processor, process until smooth adding 1.5 tablespoons of margarine per portion. Review of the facility standardized recipe for puree…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent the likelihood of foodborne illnesses and failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility census was 110. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 05/11/2026 at 3:15 p.m. titled, Food Storage Labeling with a review date of 05/2018 revealed the following in part .The facility will ensure the safety and quality of food by adhering to proper storage and labeling procedure. 1. Labelling: A. All temperature-controlled foods and ready-to-eat foods that are prepared in the facility and held for longer than twenty-four hours will be labelled. Information included on the label: Name of the food and date of storage. 3. Rotation: A. Identify the food item's use by date or expiration date. Store items with the earliest use by or expiration date in front of items with later dates. B. Foods stored in storage units will by surveyed routinely to identify and discard foods that have passed its manufacturer use by date or expiration date.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure grievances/complaints had been documented and investigated. The facility failed to open a grievance/complaint investigation for 1 (#9) of 37 sampled residents. Findings:Review of policy titled Grievances with revision date of 06/11 revealed under the section Procedure:When a complaint or grievance is voiced, a Grievance/Complaint for will be completed by the Administrator or Department Head with follow-up as appropriate. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 02/12/2026 with diagnoses that included, in part, Encounter for Surgical Aftercare Following Surgery on the Nervous System. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Syncope and Collapse, and Muscle Weakness (Generalized.) Review of Resident #9's electronic health record (EHR) revealed a Nursing Note written by S8LPN on 04/06/2026 at 2:20 p.m. S8LPN's note stated that Resident #9's family relayed to the nurse that the resident did not want to be here because staff was 'mean and rude to her.' The note continued…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
  Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required urostomy services received care consistent with professional standards of practice, as evidenced by the facility failing to ensure the physician's order for nephrostomy tube irrigation was followed for 1 (Resident #35) of 1 residents reviewed for catheter care. Total sample size: 37 Findings:Review of Resident # 35's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/27/2025, with diagnoses that included, in part.Encounter for Attention to other Artificial Openings of Urinary Tract; Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3; Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; and Hydronephrosis with Renal and Ureteral Calculous Obstruction. Review of Resident # 35's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/05/2026 revealed a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #35 required supervision and/or touching assistance for toileting and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #35's Care Plan with a review date of 03/09/2026, read in part. Resident #35 has a diagnosis of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's therapeutic diet was followed according to the physician's orders by failing to ensure a resident received double portion on her lunch tray for 1 resident (#14) in a total sample of 37 residents. Findings:Observation of Resident #14 during the lunch meal on 05/13/2026 at 11:45 a.m. revealed the resident was served one piece of chicken, instead of two pieces. Review of Resident #14's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed an admit date of 06/04/2021 and diagnoses that included in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia, Dementia in Other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Severe, with Other Behavioral Disturbance, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of the Physician's orders with a start date of 04/30/2026 revealed the diet ordered for Resident #14 was NSOT (No Salt on Tray) diet, Regular texture, Regular consistency, Double portion. Review of the resident's care plan also revealed the resident was identified with a potential for altered nutritional status.tries to take food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment were maintained in a safe operating condition for 1 (Resident #113) of 6 residents reviewed for physical environment. The total sample size was 37 residents.Review of facility policy with a last review date of 07/2025, titled Housekeeping Safety, revealed in part . Check for and report all defective equipment. Review of Resident #113's medical record revealed Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part., Parkinson's disease without Dyskinesia with Fluctuations, Neurocognitive Disorder with Lewy Bodies, and Essential Tremor. Review of Resident #113's Significant Change MDS with ARD 04/16/2026 revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #113 was dependent for all ADLs, including bed mobility. On 5/12/2026 at 8:45 a.m., observation revealed Resident #113 sitting up in bed with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs by failing to ensure the call light was accessible by a resident for 3 (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident R4) of 4 sampled residents.Review of the facility's policy titled Call Light/Bell revised 01/2024 revealed, in part.place the call light within the resident's reach before leaving the room.Resident #2Review of Resident #2's EMR revealed an admission date of 03/31/2022 with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Repeated Falls, and Personal History of Healed Traumatic Fracture.Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 10/07/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Resident #2 was dependent for toileting, hygiene, bathing, dressing, rolling, and transfers.Observation and interview of Resident #2 on 01/08/2026 at 8:54 a.m. revealed the call light was hanging off the left side of the bed, dangling below the bottom of the mattress. Resident #2 revealed she was unable to locate the call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an injury of unknown origin for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 sampled residents.Review of the facility's Critical Incident Report dated 12/08/2025 revealed Resident #1 complained of pain to her right lower extremity and x-rays revealed fractures of the tibial shaft and the proximal fibula. Statements were obtained from nursing staff who rendered care during the 48 hours prior to discovery of the injury. The facility substantiated an Injury of Unknown Origin.Review of the facility's policy titled Incident Investigation and Reporting revised 05/2024 revealed, in part.Criteria for an Injury of Unknown Origin include the source of the injury was not observed by any person, the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident, and the injury is suspicious due to the extent or location of the injury or the number of injuries at one time or the incidence of injury over time. In the event of an incident involving an allegation or suspicion of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, abuse,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that each Resident was treated with respect and dignity and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #2) out of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled Residents, by failing to ensure staff displayed respect when speaking to Resident #2.Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled Dignity and Respect, with a revision date of 07/2022 revealed in part.A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or quality of life recognizing each residents individuality. The facility shall protect and promote the rights of the resident.1. Facility staff shall display respect when speaking with, caring for and talking about residents, as constant affirmation of their individuality and dignity as human beings.2. Each resident of the facility has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure recipes for pureed diets were followed during meal preparation. This failed practice had the potential to affect 12 residents (#6, #11, # 36, #37, #46, #53, #58, #69, #71, #76, #85, and #101) who received pureed diets. Findings: Review of the Facility's lunch menu for 05/19/2025 revealed, in part .Barbeque ribs, macaroni and cheese, peas, green salad, and a roll. An observation on 05/19/2025 at 09:45 a.m. revealed a pan of pureed meat in the kitchen. S8 Dietary aide revealed meat was pureed prior to observation. S8 Dietary aide was observed pouring an unknown amount of peas in the electric food processor. S8 Dietary aide was observed not measuring portions or following the pureed recipe. Interview with S8 Dietary aide at that time revealed he eyeballs portions based on the pan he uses for pureed foods. S8 Dietary aide confirmed he does not follow recipes or measure portions when preparing pureed foods. Interview on 05/19/2025 at 09:47 a.m., S7 Dietary Manager confirmed S8 Dietary aide did not measure or follow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $660K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA