Landmark of Baton Rouge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 120.0 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 (Cart A and Cart B) of 3 medication carts reviewed. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage with a revision date of 11/2017 revealed, the following, in part: Medication storage shall meet all applicable federal, state and local guidelines. On 02/23/2026 at 11:40 a.m., an observation was made of Cart B with S6LPN, which revealed fifteen loose and unlabeled pills on the bottom of the cart's drawers. On 02/23/2026 at 11:52 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6LPN. She stated the nurses should check the medication carts daily for loose medications. S6LPN confirmed the above pills were loose and unlabeled in the cart and should not have been. On 02/23/2026 at 12:07 p.m., an observation was made of Cart A with S7LPN, which revealed one loose and unlabeled pill on the bottom of the cart's drawer. On 02/23/2026 at 12:23 p.m., an interview was conducted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary services were provided in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 117 residents served a meal tray from the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure:Staff routinely performed temperature checks on the food served to residents; and Thawing of meat in the refrigerator, in a drip-proof container.1.Review of facility's Policy titled Sanitary Conditions of the food service department with a revision date of 05/2018 revealed the following, in part: Policy: Facilities and equipment used in the preparation and serving of food provided to residents are safe and sanitary. Review of the facility's policy titled, Monitoring temperatures of cooked foods, last reviewed 02/2022, revealed the following in part: Policy: The temperature of potentially hazardous cooked foods will be monitored to insure that the foods are not in the danger zone for more than 6 hours.Procedure: 2. The temperature of each potentially hazardous food will be taken at the following times. a.) when the cooking process…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's room were clean and maintained in a sanitary manner for 1 (#15) of 3 (#15, #23, and #34) sampled residents investigated for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's room was properly cleaned.A review of Resident #15's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hemiplegia And Hemiparesis Following Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting Left Dominant Side, Dysphagia, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Aphasia On 02/24/2026 at 1:58 p.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #15's bathroom. Resident #15's bathroom was noted with the following: one foot in front of the commode was a clear wet liquid with a dried brown substance approximately 4 cm in length. Adjacent to the commode base was a large dried brown substance approximately, one foot in length and 6 inches in width. The paper towel dispenser was noted to be covered with a dry white substance. The wall next to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was labeled for 1 (#14) of 26 residents reviewed in the final sample. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control Oxygen Equipment Cleaning, with a revision date of 03/18 revealed the following:Use disposable tubing, masks, and cannulas for patients receiving oxygen therapy.7. Tubing should be replaced every 7 days.10. When not in use, store the mask/cannula in a plastic bag clearly labeled with the resident's name and date. Review of Resident #14's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Pneumonia and Atrial Fibrillation.Review of Resident #14's admission MDS with an ARD of 02/05/2026 revealed Resident #14 had a BIMS of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including services that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to ensure a resident had a physician's order before being allowed to self-administer medication, including routine medication, for 1 (#51) of 26 residents reviewed in the final sample.Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medication, with a revision date of 11/2017, revealed the following, in part:A resident will be allowed to self-administer medications only if:a) the attending physician writes or gives a verbal order that the resident may keep a medication at the bedside for the purpose of self-administration2.) All medications are kept in a locked cabinet or box in the resident's room.Review of Resident #51's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free of significant medication errors for 1 (#126) of 11 residents reviewed for medication administration. Review of Resident #126's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Sepsis due to Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). Review of Resident #126's admission MDS with an ARD of 02/24/2026 revealed it was still in progress and the BIMS had not been completed. Review of Resident #126's Discharge Orders from a local hospital dated 02/19/2026 revealed the following antibiotic order:Daptomycin-Sodium Chloride Intravenous Solution. Inject 1000 mg into the vein in the morning for 19 days. Indication: Bacteria in the blood. Review of Resident #126's Physician Orders since admission revealed, in part: Start date 02/20/2026. Daptomycin-Sodium Chloride Intravenous (IV) Solution 1000-0.9 mg/ml. Review of Resident #126's MAR dated February 2026 revealed the following, in part:Daptomycin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 1 (#15) of 2 residents reviewed for having a feeding tube. The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing care to Resident #15, who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).A review of Resident #15's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, gastrostomy status. A review of Resident #15's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Order Start Date: 07/01/2024 Enhanced Barrier Precautions - gown and gloves to be worn during high contact resident care activities (device care - feeding tube). On 02/23/2026 at 1:15 p.m., an observation of the Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign posted on the outside of Resident #15's door revealed the following, in part:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for witnessed falls. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff accurately documented Resident #1's witnessed fall. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 09/2025 and titled, Documentation, revealed the following, in part:1. Documentation shall be completed for residents on acute, observational, and incidental frequency Acute (Once per shift)Observational (Daily)Incidental (As needed)5. Whenever there is an update regarding a resident's behavior, condition, or other relevant information, it shall be documented in the resident's chart.9. It is the policy of this facility to maintain accurate medical records. Review of the facility's policy dated 09/2025 and titled, Accident/Incident Reports revealed the following, in part:7. Information regarding accidents/incidents that involve a resident will be recorded in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 (#5, #60 and #122) residents out of a total of 27 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #5 was coded correctly for PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review); 2. Resident #60 was coded correctly for pressure ulcers; and 3. Resident #122 was coded correctly for discharge. Findings: 1. Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #5's OBH-Level II Evaluation Summary & Determination Notice dated 07/17/2024 revealed under recommendations: The individual has a serious mental illness and nursing home admission was recommended. Review of Resident #5's most recent Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/17/2024 revealed Section A1500 PASRR: Is the resident currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have serious mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with mental disorders had an accurate Pre-admission Screening for 1 (#118) of 5 (#5, #6, #10, #63, and #118) residents reviewed for Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). Findings: Review of Resident #118's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis, which included Bipolar Disorder. Review of Resident #118's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/13/2025, revealed the following: Review of Section A1500 - Identification Information revealed Resident #118 was not considered for a Level II PASRR for having a serious mental illness. Review of Section I - Active Diagnoses revealed Resident #118 had a triggered diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder listed. Review of Resident #118's Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review completed by a social worker at a local hospital dated 01/31/2025, indicated Resident #118 did not presently have or at any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $865K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA