Highland Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 374 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 153 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent residents from leaving the facility unnoticed and unsupervised for 2 (two) of 7 (seven) residents who were at risk for elopement and wandering. Resident #1 and Resident #2.The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of Residents #1 and Resident #2, who had exhibited exit-seeking behaviors. This failure allowed Residents #1 and #2 to exit the facility unnoticed and unsupervised when a visitor was observed on video on 3/24/2026 at 6:20 PM holding the door open for the residents to exit. A nurse immediately responded to the door alarm sounding and went outside down the walkway but did not see the residents. Staff then searched for the residents and found both residents across a four-lane high-capacity highway in front of the facility approximately 528 feet away at 6:33 PM. The weather at the time was cloudy and the temperature was 71 degrees Fahrenheit; both residents were dressed in closed-toe shoes, pants, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement care plans for a resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care and a resident's pain medication management for two (2) of 18 resident care plans reviewed. Resident #14 and Resident #53 Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Care Plan Process, dated 8/17, revealed, Regulations require facilities to complete, at a minimum and at regular intervals, a comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity and needs, in relation to a number of specified areas. The results of the assessment, which must accurately reflect the resident's status and needs, are to be used to develop, review, and revise each resident's comprehensive person-centered plan of care. The care plan is driven not only by identified resident issues and/or conditions but also by a resident's unique characteristics, strengths, and needs. A care plan that is based on a thorough…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-06-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of pain for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pain. Resident #53 Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Pain Screen and Management, dated 12/23 revealed, All residents have the right to treatment for pain. Resident preferences are respected when deciding on methods to be used for pain management. Family members are involved when appropriate. The resident's statements are the most valid measurement of pain. Record review of facility policy titled, Medication Ordering, Reordering and Receiving Procedures, dated 12/19, revealed, Reordering Medications . On the established medication check day, the 11-7 (10-6) nurse will check all medications, not just punch cards, and reorder any medications that need to be re-filled. At the end of the shift, after all medications have been checked, the reorder will be faxed to the appropriate pharmacy. A form will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to transmit a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for discharge MDS assessments. Resident #90 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, MDS Process with a revision date of 12/20 revealed, The Assessment Nurse/Nurse Case Manager will set the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) on an allowable date with input from the interdisciplinary team and communicate scheduled assessments to the interdisciplinary team. The RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual is the source document to be used for further MDS coding guidelines, time schedules and requirements. Record review of Resident #90's Face Sheet revealed an admission date of 1/18/24 and a discharge date of 1/31/24 with a return not anticipated. During an interview on 6/19/24 at 10:05 AM, the MDS Nurse confirmed Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/31/24. She confirmed his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) was assisted with personal hygiene as evidenced by long, jagged nails with brown substance underneath nails and unshaven facial hair for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for ADLs. Resident #14 Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Shaving with a revision date of 01/24 revealed Purpose: To provide hygiene in accordance with the resident's preferences and preferred self-image. To provide for the resident's comfort. Record review of the facility policy titled, Nail Care with the latest review date of 01/24, revealed Purpose: To promote cleanliness, safety and a neat appearance. An observation and interview on 6/17/24 at 12:59 PM revealed Resident #14 sitting in his wheelchair, facial hair approximately one-half (1/2) inch to the sides of his cheeks, above his lip, and on his chin and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to label and store an aerosol nebulizer mask in a manner that prevented possible contamination of the device for one (1) of 27 nebulizers in the facility. Resident #98 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Infection Control Oxygen Equipment Cleaning with a revision date of 8/2021 revealed when not in use, store the mask/cannula in a plastic bag clearly labeled with the resident's name and date. An observation and interview with Resident #98 on 6/17/2024 at 12:39 PM, revealed a nebulizer machine was sitting on the bedside dresser, with an unbagged and undated nebulizer mask and tubing lying on top of the machine. The resident revealed she did use the mask, but she was unsure how often. An observation on 6/18/2024 at 2:08 PM, of Resident #98's room, revealed a nebulizer machine sitting on the bedside dresser with an unbagged and undated nebulizer mask and tubing draped over the machine. Record review of Resident #98's June 2024 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store controlled substances in a permanently affixed locked compartment inside the refrigerator for one (1) of two (2) medication storage rooms observed. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Controlled Drug Emergency Safe Protocol with a revision date of 6/17 revealed, Protocol: . Refrigerated controlled substances will be kept in a refrigerator lock box with the key stored in the Controlled Drug Emergency Safe. An observation of medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER], on 6/19/2024 at 8:16 AM, revealed a small black refrigerator that contained a large tan lock box with four (4) boxes of liquid lorazepam concentrate. The refrigerator also held a small clear box that contained three (3) injectable vials of lorazepam, which was secured with a yellow sealed tab. Both boxes were not permanently affixed and could be picked up and removed from the refrigerator. An interview on 6/19/2024 at 8:19 AM, with Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately document the administration of the prn (as needed) pain medication in the electronic medication system for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pain. Resident #53 Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Drug Administration and Documentation, dated 12/23, revealed, The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a unit dose container), verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident, and promptly recording the time and dose given. The policy also revealed, Chart each resident's medications on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) immediately after it is administered, as well as any administration special requirements as they are obtained, and any refused or withheld medication. PRN (as needed) medications will be documented on the MAR and the reason…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-09 · tag F0636 — pattern
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to complete the residents Minimum Data Set assessments timely according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) guidelines for six (6) of 16 residents reviewed for annual assessment. Resident's #15, #32, #79, #88, #92, and #104. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment, revealed, An assessment will be completed on each resident utilizing the MDS .The reason for the assessment, schedule and timeframe's will be according to the guidance of the Resident Instrument RAI Manual RESIDENT # 15 Record review of Resident #15's Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/27/23 revealed the assessment closure was 03/07/23, which indicated the assessment closure date was late. Record review of Resident #15's Face Sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RESIDENT# 32 Record review of Resident #32's Annual MDS with an ARD of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-09 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to complete the residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments timely according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) guidelines for nine (9) of 16 residents reviewed for quarterly assessment. Resident's #6, 20, 31, 36, 39, 49, 58, 60, and 93. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment revealed an assessment will be completed on each resident utilizing the MDS .The reason for the assessment, schedule and timeframe's will be according to the guidance of the Resident Instrument RAI Manual. Resident # 6 Record review of Resident # 6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/24/23, revealed the assessment was closed on 2/22/23 , which indicated the assessment completion date was more than 14 days after the ARD. Review of Resident #6's Face Sheet revealed an admit date of 8/5/21. Resident #20 Record review of Resident #20's Quarterly MDS with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to transmit the residents Minimum Data Set assessments timely according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) guidelines for 16 of 16 residents reviewed for assessment. Resident's 6, 15, 20, 24, 31, 32, 36, 39, 49, 58, 60, 79, 88, 92, 93, and 104. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment revealed an assessment will be completed on each resident utilizing the MDS .The reason for the assessment ,schedule and timeframes will be according to the guidance of the Resident Instrument RAI Manual. Resident #6 Record review of Resident # 6's Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/24/23, revealed the assessment was transmitted on 3/03/23, which indicated the assessment transmission date was more than 14 days after the ARD. Reviw of Resident # 6's Face Sheet revealed an admission date of 8/5/21. Resident # 15 Record review of Resident #15's MDS with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review , and facility policy review, the facility failed to send a written notice of resident transfer, including the reason for transfer, to the hospital, to the resident or resident representative (RR) for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for transfer. Resident #25 and #73. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Notice Of Hospital Transfer/Therapeutic Leave with a review date of 08/21 revealed, .#2. When a resident is transferred to the hospital, or goes out on therapeutic leave, a copy of the completed form (notice) is provided to the resident, specifying the duration of the bed-hold according to the state plan, and the facility's policy regarding bed-hold periods. In case of emergency transfer, notice at the time of transfer means that the family or resident representative are provided with written notification within 24 hours of the transfer. The requirement is met if the resident's copy of the notice is sent with other papers accompanying the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-09 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review , and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the resident or resident representative (RR) in writing of the bed hold for a resident transferred to an acute care facility for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for bed hold. Resident #73. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Notice of Hospital Transfer/Therapeutic Leave, with a latest review date of 08/21 revealed when a resident is transferred to the hospital, or goes out on therapeutic leave, a copy of the completed form (notice) is provided to the resident, specifying the duration of the bed hold according to the state plan, and the facilities policy regarding bed-hold periods. In case of an emergency transfer, notice at the time of transfer means that the family or resident representative are provided with written notification within 24 hours of the transfer. The requirement is met if the resident's copy of the notice is sent with other papers accompanying the resident to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$27,258 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $17,225 — penalty dated 2026-03-30
• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-06-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS