Heritage Manor Of Slidell

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 29.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 100.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents remained free of accident hazards for each resident who required transfer by facility's hoyer lift for 1 (#3) of 6 (#1, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3 and #R7) residents reviewed. The facility failed to secure resident's safety during transfer. This deficient practice resulted in a harm on 04/01/2024 when staff transferred Resident #3 from a Geri Chair to her bed without using a mechanical lift. Resulting in Resident #3 sustaining commuted, displaced, angulated fractures distal shafts of both the tibia and fibula and portable mildly displaced intra-articular fracture of the distal aspect of the proximal phalanx of the great toe. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's Lifting Policy with review date of 05/2023 revealed: 1. Resident will be screened for the need of manual assist for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion by failing to provide restorative therapy for 3 (#9, #71, and #88) of 21 residents reviewed in the final sample.Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Muscular Dystrophy, Right Hand Contracture, Left Hand Contracture, Right Foot Contracture, and Left Foot Contracture. Review of Resident #9's Quarterly Minimum Data Status (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/21/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Further review of Section GG, Functional Abilities, revealed Resident #9 had bilateral, upper and lower extremity impairment. Review of Resident #9's current Physician Orders revealed in part, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure staff routinely disinfected shared resident care equipment for 4 (#33, #95, #104 and #108) of 4 (#33, #95, #104 and #108) sampled residents observed during medication administration. Review of a Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) article dated 2008, updated 06/12/2024, and titled Recommendations for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities revealed the following, in part:Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities A. RationaleThe ultimate goal of the Recommendations for Disinfection and Sterilization in Health-Care Facilities is to reduce rates of health-care associated infections through appropriate use of both disinfection and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure electrical equipment was maintained in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 (#97) sampled residents reviewed for call light safety.Findings: Review of the maintenance log from April 2025 to present revealed no documented request for repair as it related to Resident #97's call light electrical wires being exposed. On 08/18/2025 at 9:30 a.m., an observation was made in Resident #97's room of the call light pulled off the wall with multiple electrical wires exposed. On 08/19/2025 at 11:20 a.m., an observation was made in Resident #97's room of the call light pulled off the wall with multiple electrical wires exposed. On 08/20/2025 at 9:30 a.m., an observation was made in Resident #97's room of the call light pulled off the wall with multiple electrical wires exposed. On 08/20/2025 at 11:35 a.m., an observation was made in Resident #97's room of the call light enclosure box and it had been repaired. On 08/20/2025 at 11:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with S11MS. He stated no staff member had reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff notified the resident representative when a resident had a significant change in condition for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia, Essential Hypertension, Primary Generalized Osteoarthritis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 2, Schizophrenia, Unspecified, and Peripheral Vascular Disease Review of Resident # 1's MDS Assessment, with an ARD of 10/29/2024, revealed a BIMS Score of 01, indicating the facility assessed him to be severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed he required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility/transfers. Review of Resident #1's Initial wound assessment completed 07/07/2025 at 12:30 p.m. by S2RN revealed the following, in part: Open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged injuries of unknown origin were reported to the State Agency within the required time frame for 1 (#1 ) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to report Resident #1's injury of unknown origin to the state agency within 24 hours of being made aware. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of Resident # 1's MDS Assessment, with an ARD of 10/29/2024, revealed a BIMS Score of 01, indicating the facility assessed him to be severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #1's Nurses Notes dated 01/06/2025 to 01/11/2025 revealed the following: On 01/11/2025 at 9:33 p.m., S3RN wrote: I was summoned to resident #1's room by S5CNA, stating that Resident #1's family was there and wanted to know what happened to his leg. Before speaking with the family, I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 93 residents who were served from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage Labeling dated 05/2018 revealed in part, the following: Policy: The facility will ensure the safety and quality of food by following good storage and labeling procedures. Procedure: 1. Labeling a. All temperature controlled foods will be labeled. Information included on the label: name of food and date of storage. Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Refrigerated Food dated 09/2022 revealed in part, the following: Policy: The facility ensures the quality and safety of refrigerated foods through accepted storage practices. Procedure: 4. No food is left uncovered. An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 08/05/2024 at 8:15 a.m., with S5DS. An observation was made of 2-open to air, unlabeled bags of shredded cheddar cheese located in the facility's refrigerator. An interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 4 (#2, #28, #43, #149) of 20 resident's reviewed in the final sample. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while in the room of Resident's #2 and #149, who were on Droplet Precautions; 2. Staff wore proper PPE while providing care to Resident #43, who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions; 3. Resident #43's urinary catheter bag remained off the floor; and 4. Staff performed proper infection control practices while performing wound care for Resident #28. Findings: 1. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was diagnosed with Covid-19 on 07/30/2024. On 08/05/2024 at 9:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #2. She stated she currently had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' assessments accurately reflected the residents' status by failing to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set was accurately coded for PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) for 2 (#21 and #54) of 6 (#21, #30, #47, #54, #76, and #91) residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings: Resident #21 Review of Resident #21's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Paranoid Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #21's 142 Form Notification of Medical Certification revealed an approval for admission by the state Level II Authority from 06/01/2023 through 05/30/2024. Review of Resident #21's PASRR Level II Evaluation dated 05/17/2023 revealed the resident had a serious mental illness. Review of Resident #21's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/08/2024 revealed Section A1500:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient services, treatment and care according to standards of professional practice for 1 (#43) of 1 (#43) residents that were reviewed for urinary catheter. The facility failed to ensure Resident #43's urinary catheter bag was below the level of the resident's bladder. Findings: Review of Resident #43's record revealed, in part, Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder. Review of Resident #43's Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: 02/21/2024 Resident has an indwelling catheter: for diagnosis of Neurogenic Bladder. Interventions: Position urine catheter bag below bladder. On 08/06/2024 at 2:15 p.m., an observation was made of S11CNA and S12CNA performing catheter care on Resident #43. Resident #43 was lying in bed with the catheter bag secured to the left side of her bed frame, above waist level horizontally. Immediately following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 (Cart A) of 2 (Cart A and Cart B) medication carts observed. The facility failed to ensure Insulin pens were discarded 28 days after the date opened. Findings: Review of the revised 10/2023, NovoLog injection package insert provided by the facility revealed, in part: Until first use: Unused NovoLog FlexPen stored at room temperature should be thrown away after 28 days. In-use: The NovoLog FlexPen you are using should be thrown away after 28 days, even if it still has insulin left in it. On 08/05/2024 at 9:15 a.m., an observation was made of Cart A with S8LPN who confirmed Resident #13 and Resident #53's Novolog insulin FlexPens were observed to have an opened date of 06/24/2024. On 08/05/2024 at 9:17 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8LPN. She stated all insulin pens should be dated when first opened, and the pen should be discarded 28 days after the opened date written on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,333 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,333 — penalty dated 2024-04-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $864K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA