Perry County Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 51.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling catheter was managed in a manner to prevent possible complications when nursing staff failed to assess and respond timely to a resident's complaint of catheter-related discomfort for one (1) of (1) residents reviewed for urinary catheters. Resident #1.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Quality of Care, revised 08/24, revealed, .1. Commitment to Quality of Care. The Facility is committed to providing care and services necessary to work toward, attain and/or maintain each resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being.3. Assessment and Treatment. The assessment and treatment of residents should be undertaken by competent and qualified individuals who have the authority and responsibility to conduct that assessment and treatment.A review of the facility's Standing Orders, dated 2/27/26, revealed, .Urinary System: If resident has Foley catheter, check for patency.If over 6 hours of no or decreased output, notify Provider.A record review of the Order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy and assessment review, the facility failed to designate a licensed nurse to serve as the charge nurse for each tour of duty for two (2) of three (3) shifts reviewed (3:00 PM-11:00 PM and 11:00 PM-7:00 AM), which had the potential to affect all 57 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Nursing Services-Staffing, revised 11/17, revealed, .3. Each facility will designate a nurse.as a Charge Nurse on each tour of duty. The Charge Nurse.will supervise the care rendered to the residents to promote quality of life, resident rights, and to assure that the care rendered is consistent with areas identified in the comprehensive care plan.A record review of the facility's Facility Assessment, dated 11/17/25, revealed, .Facility Resources needed to Provide Competent Support and Care for Our Resident Population.Staffing Plan.7AM-3PM shift 7 aides (Certified Nurse Aides)/2 LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurse)/1 Charge/TX (Treatment) RN (Registered Nurse); 3PM-11PM shift 4 aides/2 LPNs; 11PM-7AM shift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to the provision of care in a respectful and dignified manner when staff provided incontinent care for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents without ensuring privacy. (Resident #1).Findings include:A review of the facility's document, A Matter of RIGHTS: A Guide to Your Rights and Responsibilities as a Resident, Copyright 2020, revealed, .Dignity and Respect: You have the right to dignity and respect in the care you receive.A review of the facility's Aide Check List, with the latest revision dated December 2020, revealed, .Ensure privacy for Residents.A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 8/13/24 and he had diagnoses including Vascular Dementia.A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/17/25 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated he was severely cognitively impaired.On 10/2/25 at 8:27 AM, during an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of quality and accepted standards of practice by not referencing the Medication Administration Record (MAR) during medication preparation and administration for one (1) of three (3) residents observed for medication administration (Residents #8).Findings include:Review of the facility's Oral Medication Administration Procedures, dated 03/25, revealed, .3. Verify the physicians order, comparing the medication label to the MAR to verify the following: a. Right medication b. Right dosage c. Right route d. Right time e. Right resident .On 10/1/25 at 4:26 PM, during an observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 prepared and administered medications to Resident #8 without reference to the MAR. The laptop on top of the medication cart displayed only the resident roster and not an individual MAR as LPN #1 prepared and administered medications.On 10/1/25 at 5:00 PM, during an interview, LPN #1 confirmed she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) received personal hygiene and incontinence care in a safe and dignified manner, consistent with accepted standards of practice, for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents (Resident #1).Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Activities for Daily Living, reviewed 09/25, revealed, .Procedure.2. ADLs shall include, but are not limited to personal hygiene, bathing, voiding, toileting, repositioning, and meals offered.A review of the facility's Aide Check List, dated 12/20, revealed, .DOES YOUR RESIDENT HAVE.3. Resident shaved-males and females .A review of the facility's policy, Disposable Brief, dated of 01/24, revealed, .Procedure.REMOVING SOILED BRIEF 4. For a bedbound resident: a. loosen the tapes (tabs) securing the soiled brief. b. Assist the resident to roll onto their side facing away from you.APPLYING A CLEAN BRIEF 6. For the bedbound resident.b. Assist the resident to roll to their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory medications were administered in accordance with manufacturer's instructions by not instructing a resident to rinse the mouth following administration of an inhaled corticosteroid for one (1) of three (3) medication administrations reviewed, Resident #4. Findings included:A review of the facility's policy, Administration of Medications, revised 03/25, revealed, PURPOSE: To administer medications in accordance with best practice.A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #4 on 6/10/25 with current diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/16/25 revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated he was cognitively intact.A record review of the Order Summary Report revealed Resident #4 had a Physician's Order, dated 9/12/25 for Symbicort Inhalation Aerosol…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by not maintaining appropriate and comfortable water temperatures in resident rooms on three (3) of three (3) resident halls, affecting all 57 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Resident Environment, dated 9/15, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment . Resident #21 On 5/5/25 at 11:53 AM, during an observation, the hot water in Resident #21's bathroom (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reached a lukewarm temperature after a few minutes but never became hot. On 5/6/25 at 1:00 PM, during an interview with Resident #21, he explained the hot water in his bathroom never gets hot and he must wash his face with cold water every day. He stated he had told everyone about the issue, but nothing had been done. He added that even after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's rights to make choices regarding daily routines by not assisting a cognitively impaired resident outdoors for scheduled smoking breaks (Resident #25) and regarding bathing times (Resident Council Attendees: Res #33, #2, #51, #5, #10, #41, #31, #16, #11, and #20) for 11 of 57 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Resident's Rights Policy, dated of 3/24 revealed, Every resident in this facility has the right to .22. Use tobacco in accordance with applicable policies, rules, and laws . A review of the facility's policy, Dignity and Respect, dated 7/22 revealed, A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life recognizing each resident's individuality. This facility shall protect and promote the rights of the resident. 1. Facility staff shall display respect when .caring for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's food preferences and provide a menu alternative for one (1) of sixteen (16) sampled residents. Resident #30. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy, Dignity and Respect, dated 7/2022 revealed, A facility must treat each resident with dignity and respect and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life recognizing each resident's individuality . 4 . Residents' individual preferences regarding such things as menus . will be elicited and respected by the facility, and efforts will be made to accommodate these wishes . A review of the facility's policy, Alternate Food for Food Preferences, dated 5/2018 revealed, Substitutes of similar nutritive value are offered to residents who refuse food served . 7. The nursing assistant, on observing that a resident is refusing a food, offers the alternate food to the resident . On 5/5/25 at 11:04 AM, during an interview and observation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and facility policy review the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to ensure the program was sustained during transitions in leadership and failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions the committee put into place in March 2021. This was for one (1) recited deficiency originally cited in March 2021 on an annual recertification survey. The deficiency was in the area of activities. The facility's continued failure during two federal surveys shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAPI Committee. Findings Include: Review of the facility's, Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program, revised 11/22, revealed .This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The facility shall have in place a system that continuously strive to improve the quality of care and services received by residents in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $216K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS