Heritage Manor Of Ville Platte

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 28.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 110.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse and psychosocial harm (#1), by another resident (#2), in a total sample of 6 residents (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, and #R3). The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's Investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. This failed practice resulted in an actual harm situation on 09/06/2024 at approximately1:42 p.m., when S4 Housekeeper walked by Resident #1's room, and observed Resident #2 remove his hand from beneath Resident #1's covers near her bottom. S4 Housekeeper immediately informed S3 LPN of her observation. S3 LPN immediately went to Resident #1's room, and observed Resident #2 pull back Resident #1's covers, and slide his hand from Resident #1's thigh area into her brief. S3 LPN immediately intervened, and removed Resident #2 from Resident #1's room. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included in part .Cerebral Palsy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a reasonable accommodation of their needs by failing to ensure the call light was accessible to a resident for 1 (Resident #59) of 48 sampled residents.Review of facility policy titled Call Light/Bell with revision date of 01/2024, revealed in part. Purpose: to provide the resident a means of communication with staff members. Procedure: 1. Ensure resident has call light in reach when in resident room or in bathroom/shower room. 7. Leave the resident comfortable. Place the call light within the residents reach before leaving the room.Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/27/2025, with diagnoses that included, in part,. Cerebrovascular Disease Unspecified, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting the left dominant side, Major Depressive Disorder, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder.Review of Resident #59's Quarterly MDS with ARD 11/20/2025 revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Resident #59…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure food was properly sealed and stored in the stand-alone freezer, walk-in cooler, and walk-in freezer area of the facility's kitchen. This had the potential to affect 108 residents who were served from the kitchen. Findings:Review of the facility's policy, titled, Storage of Refrigerated Food, with a revised date of 09/25, revealed, in part.No food is left uncovered. Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Frozen Food, with a revised date of 09/22, revealed, in part.No food is left uncovered. An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 01/27/2026 at 8:50 a.m. with S4DM. Observations were made of the following items:Stand-Alone Freezer:An opened cardboard box of rolls with the inside plastic liner opened and unsecured.An opened cardboard box of biscuits with the inside plastic liner opened and unsecured.Walk-in Cooler:An opened cardboard box of bacon with the inside plastic liner opened and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled Residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility policy with last review date of 05/2024 titled: Incident Investigation and Reporting read in part. To provide guidance to the facility for investigation and reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property and/or other reportable incidents to LDH, Health Standards Section. 1. Each resident residing in this facility has the right to be free from any type of abuse. Verbal Abuse: The use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of the age, ability to comprehend, or disability. 3. Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property and Exploitation are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/07/2025, with diagnoses including, in part . Cerebrovascular Accident and Dysphagia. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS with ARD of 03/14/2025 revealed, in part . a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's Discharge Return Anticipated MDS with an ARD 04/03/2025 revealed, in part .Resident #1 did not have a mechanically altered diet. Review of Resident #1's Medicare 5-Day End of Part A Stay MDS with an ARD of 04/08/2025 revealed, in part .Resident #1 did not have coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medications. Review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed, in part . 1. a mechanical soft diet was ordered on 04/02/2025, 2. a pureed diet with nectar consistency for aspiration pneumonia was ordered on 04/07/2025, and 3. a chest x-ray (CXR) was ordered after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Care Plan Process with a revision date of 12/2024, revealed, in part .the baseline care plan shall be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/07/2025 with diagnoses including, in part . Cerebrovascular Accident and Dysphagia. Review of Resident #1's Baseline Care Plan revealed an effective date of 03/10/2025 at 3:06 p.m. Interview with S2DON on 05/28/2025 at 9:36 a.m. revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on Friday, 03/07/2025 and the Baseline Care Plan was developed on Monday, 03/10/2025. S2DON confirmed Resident #1's Baseline Care Plan was not developed within 48 hours of admission to the facility, but should have been.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  F657: CARE PLAN TIMING AND REVISION Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan was revised after a quarterly assessment for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Care Plan Process with a revision date of 12/2024 revealed, in part .A well developed and executed assessment and care plan re-evaluates the resident's status at prescribed intervals using the RAI and then modifies the individualized care plan as appropriate and necessary. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/17/2019, with diagnoses including, in part . Huntington's Disease, Altered Mental Status, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Repeated Falls. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/25/2025 revealed, in part .a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #3 had no fractures. Review of Resident #3's current comprehensive care plan revealed, in part .Acute Non-displaced Fracture at the tip of the nasal bones, initiated on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure a swallowing assessment was completed for a resident who exhibited difficulty swallowing and coughing during meals. Findings: Review of the facility's policy entitled Therapy Screenings, revised 10/2019, revealed, in part .residents are to be screened when there is a referral from another discipline, or a change in function. High-risk residents (those who have had previous treatment or have a medical condition which may contribute to decreased function or impairment) are to be re-screened. A nurse who notes a functional decline in the long-term resident should complete a Nursing Therapy Progress Note. The therapy department should coordinate the therapy screening procedure to ensure completion within 48 hours. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/17/2019, with diagnoses including, in part . Huntington's Disease, Altered Mental Status, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed in order to meet the nutritional needs of residents who required a puree diet. The facility failed to follow the recipe in regards to ingredients of the meal for 6 of 6 (#7, #30, #36, #40, #87, and #99) sampled residents who received a puree diet. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 05/2018 titled: Preparation and Service of Pureed Diets read in part . After preparation of all food items the cook, will use the specified serving, portion out the needed amount of food to puree from the stock of regular or therapeutic food items. Review of the recipe for 10 servings of pureed rotisserie chicken revealed the following: -10 4 oz. rotisserie chicken -3 tablespoon and 1/2 teaspoon of food thickener bulk -1 1/2 cup and 1 tablespoon of chicken stock Review of the recipe for 10 servings of pureed broccoli cauliflower blend revealed the following: -10 1/2 cup of broccoli cauliflower blend -3 tablespoon and 1teaspoon food thickener bulk Interview on 10/29/2024 at 9:00 a.m. with S8…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #5 and Resident #7) of 33 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to follow proper infection control practices during wound care for Resident #5 and failed to properly isolate Resident #7, as ordered. Findings: Resident #5 Observation on 10/28/2024 at 1:07 p.m. revealed Resident #5 lying in bed. She had a wound vac in progress and stated she had a wound to her bottom. Resident #5 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to wound, catheter, and tube feeding. Observation on 10/28/2024 at 4:13 p.m. revealed S4 Treatment Nurse arrived at Resident #5's room. S4 Treatment Nurse entered room wearing gloves only and no gown. S4 Treatment Nurse exited after a few moments and stated she would have to change Resident #5's wound vac and was going to gather her supplies. Observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards for 2 (Resident #7 and Resident #19) of 33 residents reviewed by failing to administer medications properly. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Administration of Medications with a revision date of 01/2024 revealed the following in part: Topical Medications - Purpose: Application of medication to the skin; Supplies: Topical Medication; As Indicated: Measuring Device; and Procedure: 2. Verify the physician order, comparing the medication label to the order verify the following: b. Right Dosage; 11. Apply the topical medication according to the directions. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's Face Sheet revealed an initial admit date of 06/24/2024 and a readmit date of 10/18/2024. Resident #7 had the following diagnoses including: Pneumonia, unspecified organism; MRSA, unspecified site and UTI. Review of Resident #7's 10/2024 Physician Orders revealed the following: 10/18/2024 - Zyvox Oral Tablet 600 mg po BID for UTI until 10/28/2024. Review of Resident #7's 10/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,022 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,022 — penalty dated 2024-09-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $900K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA