Myrtles Nursing Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 78.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention and investigation policy when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 witnessed Registered Nurse (RN) #1 attempting to prevent Resident #2 from bringing cigarettes into the facility and did not report the incident to the Administrator for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #2).Findings included:A review of the facility's policy Incident Investigation & Reporting, revised 05/24, revealed, .Purpose: To provide guidance to the facility for investigation and reporting incidents.3.In the event of any incident involving an allegation or suspicion of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, abuse.each occurrence will be reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility.A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on 7/3/24 with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction.A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed to prevent the possible spread of infection as evidenced by, not following enhanced barrier precautions, improper hand hygiene and glove changes and allowing a urinary catheter bag to touch the floor for three (3) of (19) sampled residents. (Resident #9, Resident #36, and Resident #68) Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control, revised on 04/21, revealed The facility will maintain an Infection Control Program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment where residents reside with minimal exposure to the development and transmission of disease and infection . Handwashing is the most to effective means of infection prevention . A review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revised on 01/24, revealed, Purpose: To cleanse hands to prevent transmission of infection or other condition . To provide clean,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the Resident, or the Resident Representative (RR), written notification of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer for one (1) of 19 sampled residents. (Resident #60) Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy tiled, Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer/Leave, dated 12/23, revealed, Bed Hold Agreement . If bed-hold due to hospital transfer or therapeutic leave becomes necessary, the facility will notify the resident or resident's representative of the bed-hold option . A review of the Progress Notes, dated 7/21/24 for Resident #60, revealed that the resident was transferred to the local hospital at 6:13 PM per local ambulance, due to bleeding from the dialysis shunt. On 10/02/24 at 2:14 PM, during an interview, the Accounts Manager (AM) stated that if the resident is their own Responsible Representative (RR), she provides the bed-hold and transfer letter to the resident. She further explained that if a resident is on Medicare, they must pay the facility for each day they are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete an annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed. (Resident #77). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment, with the revision date of 09/19, revealed, An assessment will be completed on each resident utilizing the MDS. The reason for assessment, schedule and timeframes will be according to the guidance of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. The Registered Nurse (RN) is responsible for verifying the completion of the assessment. The completed assessment guide the staff in identifying key information about the resident and serves as a basis for identifying resident specific issues and objectives in order to develop a care plan. This process assists the resident in reaching the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . A record review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2019, revealed, The ARD (Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to submit discharge and annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner for three (3) of (19) resident MDSs reviewed. (Resident #55, #60, and #77). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment, with the revision date of 09/19, revealed, An assessment will be completed on each resident utilizing the MDS. The reason for assessment, schedule and timeframes will be according to the guidance of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. The Registered Nurse (RN) is responsible for verifying the completion of the assessment. The completed assessment guide the staff in identifying key information about the resident and serves as a basis for identifying resident specific issues and objectives in order to develop a care plan. This process assists the resident in reaching the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . A review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2019, revealed:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement residents' care plans for three (3) of (19) care plans reviewed. (Residents #9, #36, and #68) Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Process, with the latest revision date of 08/17, revealed: Regulations require facilities to complete, at a minimum and at regular intervals, a comprehensive standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity and needs, in relation to a number of specified areas (e.g., customary routine, vision, and continence). The results of the assessment, which must accurately reflect the resident's status and needs, are to be used to develop, review, and revise each resident's comprehensive person-centered plan of care . Care Area Assessments (CAA's) assist in guiding an individualized plan of care and should provide structure for the care and services that are needed . Resident #9: A record review of Resident #9's Comprehensive Care Plan with a problem onset date of 10/20/2023 revealed the resident had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in a locked storage area and available to only authorized personnel when medications were left at a resident's bedside for one (1) of (19) sampled residents. (Resident # 47) Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, with revision date of 11/17, revealed .Medication storage shall meet all applicable federal, state, and local guidelines . At 10:30 AM on 09/30/24, during the initial tour, Resident #47's door was open, but the resident was not in the room. An observation revealed two (2) medications in boxes, including nasal spray and an inhaler, on the bedside table. At 11:54 AM on 09/30/24, during an observation and interview, Resident #47 was observed sitting in a wheelchair, ready for lunch, with the bedside table in front of the resident. The two (2) medications, including nasal spray and an inhaler, were still on the bedside table. Resident #47 explained that the nurse had left the medications there earlier that morning and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observations, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a resident with a physician-ordered diet of chopped bite-size meats for one (1) of (19) sampled residents. Resident #1. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Dental Soft Mechanical Soft Diet, revised 2016, revealed . The diet should be individualized to meet a particular patient's needs . meats may be ground or diced based on the individual's tolerance . On 09/30/24 at 11:40 AM, during an interview, Resident #1 stated that her meat was supposed to be served in bite-size pieces, but it was often pureed. She expressed that she disliked pureed meat and would refuse to eat it. Resident #1 further noted that her meal ticket specified bite-size meat, but it was not consistently provided. On 09/30/24 at 11:58 AM, an observation of Resident #1's food tray revealed a baked pork chop that was shredded instead of being cut into bite-size pieces, as ordered. On 10/02/24 at 11:53 AM, during an observation and interview, Resident #1 was served ham that was cut into…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, plan of correction review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to sustain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, as evidenced by one (1) re-cited deficiency originally cited in February 2023 on an annual recertification survey for (1) of two (2) annual recertification surveys reviewed. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Preface - QAPI, dated 11/22, revealed: Our residents are the primary concern of this facility. This facility is committed to providing the highest quality of life supported by quality care for the aged and convalescent resident. To ensure resident health, safety, and proper care and treatment, each facility shall maintain a manual consisting of policies and procedures to detail effectively the scope of services .This manual shall serve as a guideline for the staff to .accomplish the goals and objectives of the facility . During observation, interviews, and record review on 10/2/24, the facility failed to maintain proper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff and Resident Representative (RR) interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to protect private health information for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. (Resident #6) Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Confidentiality of Resident Information, with a revision date of 05/18 revealed, Policy: The health record is the property of the health care facility and is maintained to serve the resident, the health care providers, and the institution in accordance with legal regulatory requirements. All resident care information shall be regarded as confidential and available only to authorized users . On 6/26/24 at 10:30 AM, during a telephone interview with the RR for Resident #3, she stated that on 6/18/24, she went to the facility to retrieve copies of her brother's medical records from the facility Administrator. The RR stated that she also received three (3) pages of the medical records of Resident #6. A record review of copies of the three (3) pages of medical records belonging to Resident #6 that were given to the RR of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $516K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS