Clarksdale Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 34.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an elopement/wandering risk plan of care for Resident #1 who had worn a wander guard since 8/9/23. Resident #1 was one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed who wore a wander guard. Resident #1 was missing from the facility for approximately two (2) and a half (1/2) hours - three (3) and a half (1/2) hours prior to discovery. No facility staff saw the resident leave the facility and no facility staff were aware that Resident #1 was missing until approximately 9:30 PM when they received a call that Resident #1 was at a convenience store. It was also determined that Resident #1 was found at a convenience store approximately eight- tenths of a mile from the facility on a busy four (4) lane highway. Resident #1 was returned to the facility via personal vehicle by a facility staff at approximately 9:50 PM on 01/30/24, after the convenience store employee called the facility to report that Resident #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, family interview, observations, facility security camera video review, record reviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had adequate supervision to prevent an elopement from the facility on 01/30/24 and failed to ensure the wander guard system was properly functioning for one (1) of five (5) residents who were elopement risk and wore wander guards. Resident #1. Resident #1 was missing from the facility for approximately two and a half (2 1/2) hours to three (3) and a half (1/2) hours prior to discovery. No facility staff saw the resident leave the facility and no facility staff were aware that Resident #1 was missing until approximately 9:30 PM when they received a call that Resident #1 was at a convenience store. Resident #1 was found at a convenience store approximately eight-tenths of a mile from the facility on a busy four lane. Resident #1 was returned to the facility via personal vehicle by a facility staff at approximately 9:50 PM on 01/30/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify a dialysis clinic of a significant change in a resident's status for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for notification of change (Resident #1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Change in Resident Medical Status, last revised 9/17, revealed a change in medical status is defined as any physical, psychological, and/or medical deviation as compared to the resident's status as noted in the initial assessment. During review of a complaint received related to Resident #1, it was revealed that the facility did not inform the dialysis clinic of the resident's fall that resulted in a brain bleed. Record review of a document dated 2/27/25 from (Proper Name) Medical Center revealed Resident #1 presented to the Emergency Department (ED) related to a fall with injury and was diagnosed with a subdural hematoma and a scalp laceration. An interview with the Nurse Practitioner on 6/18/25 at 11:00 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plans related to fluid restriction (Resident #11), nail care (Resident's #24 & #44) and following Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for (Resident #157) for four (4) of 19 care plans reviewed. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan Process, revised 08/17, revealed The facility staff shall follow the care plan . Resident # 11 Record review of the Care Plan for Resident #11 revealed Resident receives dialysis .Has fluid restrictions 960 cubic centimeters (cc's) in a 24 hour per day (see EMAR). Record review of August 2024 Electronic Medical Record (EMAR) for Resident #11 revealed the resident received more than 960 cc's of fluid per day for none (9) of 13 days from 8/1/24 through 8/13/24. (8/1/24, 8/2/24, 8/5/24, 8/6/24, 8/7/24, 8/8/24, 8/9/24, 8/11/24, and 8/12/24). During an interview with Nurse Case Manager on 8/14/24 at 2:05 PM, she verified that Resident #11's care plan indicated that he was on a 960 cc per day fluid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were clean and trimmed, as evidenced by long and jagged nails with a brown substance under nails for two (2) of eight (8) residents observed. Resident #24 and Resident #44 Findings include: Record review of the facility's, Nail Care Policy, revised 07/10, revealed Purpose: To promote cleanliness, safety, and a neat appearance . Procedure .1. Perform hand hygiene . 7. Remove any debris from under the nails. 8. Trim the nails straight across . 14. Document all appropriate information in the clinical record . Resident #24 During an observation on 08/13/24 at 10:40 AM, Resident #24's fingernails were long and jagged, approximately one-half (1/2) inch past the tips of fingers on both hands. An observation on 08/14/24 at 9:13 AM, Resident #24's fingernails were long and jagged, approximately one-half (1/2) inch past the tips of fingers on both hands. During an observation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA) failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions the committee put in placing following the recertification survey on 4/6/2023 and the complaint survey on 6/26/2024. This was for deficiency recited during a recertification on 8/15/2024 in the area of F677 Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The continued failure of the facility during three State Surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility to sustain an effective QAA program. This was for one (1) of seven (7) deficient practice citations. Findings Included: This citation is cross-referenced to: F677 Review of the facility policy titled QAPI Performance Improvement Project (PIP) with a revision date of 11/22 revealed, The QA Committee annually prioritizes activities, endorses or re-endorses policies and procedures, and continually monitors for improvement through the use of a QAPI self-assessment. In addition, the QA Committee will implement any PIP topics as indicated through data analysis. PIPs are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that a fluid restriction was followed for one (1) of five (5) residents on fluid restrictions. Resident #11. Findings included: Record review of facility policy Fluid Restriction with the latest review date of 02/22 revealed Policy: Fluids will be restricted for residents as directed by physician orders .Fluid Restriction 1000 cc's (cubic centimeters), Total Nursing 300 cc's, By Shift 120cc's day, 90 cc's evening (eve), 90 cc's night (noc). Total Dietary 700 cc's . Record review of August 2024 Active Orders for Resident #11 revealed Fluid Restriction 960 Milliliters (ML) per day with an onset date of 3/10/23. Record review of August 2024 Electronic Medical Record (EMAR) for Resident #11 revealed that Resident #11 received more than 960 cc's of fluid per day for nine (9) of 13 days from 8/1/24 through 8/13/24. (8/1/24, 8/2/24, 8/5/24, 8/6/24, 8/7/24, 8/8/24, 8/9/24, 8/11/24, and 8/12/24). In an interview with the Dietary Manager on 8/14/24 at 1:08 PM, she stated that Resident #11 was on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for intravenous antibiotic therapy on two (2) of five (5) care area observations requiring enhanced barrier precautions. (Resident # 157). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 03/24, revealed .Indwelling medical device examples include central lines . A peripheral intravenous line (not a peripherally inserted central catheter) is not considered an indwelling medical device for the purpose of EBP . During entrance rounds on 8/13/24 at 12:00 PM, an observation revealed Registered Nurse (RN)/ Treatment nurse hanging a bag of intravenous (IV) fluids to Resident #157 right upper arm access device. The RN/Treatment nurse was not observed to be wearing a gown for enhanced barrier precautions, and there were no signs observed in the resident's room or on the doorway to alert staff of enhanced barrier…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received incontinent care during a night shift for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed. Resident #1. Findings Include: Record review of a typed statement by the Administrator dated 06/26/24 on Company Letterhead revealed, Clarksdale Nursing Center does not have a policy specific to how frequent ADL (Activities of Daily Living) rounds are made or incontinent care provided. On 06/26/24 at 7:40 AM, an observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN) revealed her entering Resident #1's room and confirmed that his brief was soaked with urine and that he should have been changed during the Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) last rounds. State Agency (SA) observed Resident #1 telling LPN #1 that he had not been changed during the night and she stated to Resident #1, I'm sorry. I will get someone to change you now. LPN #1 revealed that leaving a resident wet for long periods could cause all kinds of problems including urinary tract infections, bed sores,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident observation and staff interviews the facility failed to promote dignity related to a catheter bag stored without a privacy bag for one (1) of two (2) residents with urinary catheters. Resident # 13. Findings include: Record review of the statement typed on facility letterhead signed by the Administrator and dated April 5, 2023, revealed, .We do not have a policy on the use of a privacy catheter bag. An observation on 4/04/23 at 10:52 AM , revealed a catheter bag hanging on the left side of Resident #13's bed with no privacy bag and visible to the SA and any visitors walking in the hallway. An observation and interview on 4/05/23 at 2:20 PM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) # 3 confirmed the catheter bag was hanging on the right side of the bed with no privacy bag and there should be one and confirmed that it could be embarrassing for a resident if their bag of urine was visible for everyone to see. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 4/4/23 at 2:25 PM, she confirmed all residents with catheters should have a privacy bag and revealed it is a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to honor a resident's choice for showers for one (1) of 20 residents reviewed. Resident #30 Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled Bathing, with a revision date of 10/17, Processes 1. Inquire with the resident concerning bathing preferences (e.g., time of day, type of bathing-shower, bed bath, etc.) 2. Offer the resident choice in their bathing routine . During an interview with Resident #30 on 4/04/23 at 11:43 AM, she stated that she was unsure of the last time she had a shower. Resident #30 stated that she gets a 'wash up' but no shower and that she would like to have a shower. On 4/04/23 at 4:35 PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that before COVID the shower schedule was Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for A beds and Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday for B beds. She verified that they haven't gotten back to the shower schedule since COVID started. She revealed if a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to submit a Change in Status referral for a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) related to a new diagnosis of Schizophrenia and after a significant change from a psychiatric in-patient stay for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed. Resident # 31. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy titled Pre-admission Screening PAS/PASRR (MS Only), revised 10/18, revealed A Change in status referral for Level II Resident Review Evaluations is Required for Individuals who have not been previously identified by PASRR to have Mental illness . A resident who exhibits behavioral, psychiatric, or mood related symptoms suggesting the presence of a mental diagnosis as defined under 42 CFR 483.100 .A resident is transferred, admitted to a Nursing Facility (NF) following an impatient psychiatric stay or equally intensive treatment . A record review of Resident #31's Diagnosis list revealed a new diagnosis of Schizophrenia on 3/31/22 and a review of the Physician Psychiatric…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,036 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,036 — penalty dated 2024-02-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $404K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS