Landmark Of Acadiana

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 22.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 118.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care and/or follow physician's orders for 3 (Resident #82, Resident #11, Resident #13) out of 40 sampled residents as evidenced by:1.failing to implement the comprehensive plan of care for a floor mat when in bed for Resident #82;2.failing to develop a comprehensive plan of care for antipsychotic use for Resident #11; and3.failing to follow physician's orders for PEG (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube water flush for Resident #13. Findings: Resident #82: Review of Resident #82's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, other specified fracture of left acetabulum, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, dementia, cognitive communication deficit and hypertension. Review of Resident #82's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/16/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review; the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, by failing to ensure:1. Proper infection control techniques were practiced during catheter care for Resident #87; and2. Reusable equipment was sanitized prior to and after resident use.The facility census was 120.Findings: 1.Resident #87: Review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care, with a last reviewed date of 01/2024, revealed in part, Purpose: to cleanse the perineum and to prevent irritation or infection. Review of Resident #87's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, in part, retention of urine, urinary tract infection, and overactive bladder. On 02/11/2026 at 8:43 a.m., an observation was made of S8CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) providing catheter care for Resident #87. S8CNA donned a gown and gloves and wiped Resident' #87's perineal area and indwelling catheter with a wet towel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the oral status of 1 (Resident #99) of 40 sampled residents. Review of Resident #99's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dysphagia and bradycardia.A review of Resident #99's Comprehensive MDS assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 09/30/2025 was conducted. Section C - Cognitive Patterns 0500 revealed Resident #99 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #99's MDS revealed in section L - Oral/Dental Status - L0200D, Obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth, not checked.On 02/09/2026 at 9:44 a.m., an interview and observation was conducted with Resident #99. He stated that he had only a few teeth in his mouth and would like to see a dentist, but had never…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#13) out of 40 sampled residents by failing to ensure EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) was accurately documented for Resident #13.Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled, Documentation, with a last reviewed date of 09/2025, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to maintain accurate medical records.A review of Resident #13's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery and encounter for attention to gastrostomy.A review of Resident #13's physician orders read in part, start date: 09/23/2025 enteral feed. flush PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) tube with 180 cc (cubic centimeters) of water every 4 hours.A review of Resident #13's February 2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service, and ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen as evidenced by: 1. opened food items in the walk-in freezer, dry storage room, and reach-in cooler not labeled with the date and time; 2. expired food in the dry storage area; and 3. a thick layer of debris on the deep fryer cooking oil collection area. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 117 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings: On 01/13/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage Labeling, with a last revision date of 05/18, last reviewed date of 09/05/2024, revealed in part .Policy: The facility will ensure the safety and quality of food by following good storage and labeling procedures. Procedure: 1. Labeling- a. All temperature controlled foods and ready to eat foods that are prepared in the facility and held for longer than twenty-four hours will be labeled. Information included on the label: Name of the food, Date of Storage . 3.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to call light device was in reach for 2 (#49 and #86) out of 35 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #49 Review of Resident #49's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, difficulty in walking; other abnormalities of gait and mobility; other lack of coordination; pain, unspecified; and history of falling. Review of Resident #49's Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 01/02/2025 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 7, indicating that the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #49's comprehensive care plan, revealed in part, Focus-The resident is at risk for falls r/t (related to) muscle weakness and lack of coordination. Interventions- Place call light within reach. On 01/13/2025 at 1:51 PM, an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #49. The resident was lying in bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assessment accurately reflected the resident's status by failing to ensure a resident's discharge status was accurately coded for 1 (#117) resident of 35 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, fracture of right femur, pain in right knee, and seizures. A review of Section A2105 of Resident #117's Discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident was discharged to a short-term general hospital. A review of Resident #117's Physician's Orders revealed an order written on 12/23/2024 that read, DC (discharge) to home, home health skilled nurse, PT (physical therapy), OT (occupational therapy), ST (speech therapy) to eval (evaluate). A review of Resident #117's Progress Notes dated 12/23/2024 by S5LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) read in part, . RP (responsible party) arrived to take resident home . On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#67) of 35 sampled residents. The facility failed to develop a focus area with interventions related to hospice services for Resident #67. On 01/15/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Process with a last revision date of 12/2024, read in part, The overall care plan should be oriented towards: 1. Preventing avoidable declines in functioning or functional levels or otherwise clarifying why another goal takes precedence (e.g., palliative approaches in end of life situations. 10. Assess and planning for care to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. A review of Resident #67's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, and non-rheumatic aortic valve stenosis. A review of Resident #67's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was visually impaired received necessary services to maintain good nutrition for 1 (#9) of 2 (#8 and #9) residents investigated for Comm-sensory (communication and sensory) out of a total of 35 sampled residents. Findings: Record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Legal Blindness and Unspecified Dementia. Review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/24/2024, revealed in section B that his vision was severely impaired. Review of Resident #9's care plan revealed a focus dated 08/27/2024 that the resident was able to feed self with set up and supervision, and another on 08/28/2024 that the resident had impaired visual function related to blindness. On 01/13/2025 at 8:55 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #9 in his room. The resident was alone with his breakfast…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to accurately document on the Nurse Data Collection and Screening Form for bed rails for Resident #39 and Resident #49 out of a finalized sample of 35 residents. Findings: Resident #39 Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/20/2016 with diagnoses including, which were not limited to, cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, aphasia, muscle weakness, weakness, unspecified lack of coordination, and history of falling. Review of Resident #39's comprehensive care plan, revealed in part, Focus- Resident's Current Safety Devices and Special Equipment with an intervention- Assist Rail. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed a Nurse Data and Collection Screening assessment dated [DATE] completed by S8LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). Review of the assessment revealed in part: Section titled Restraint Necessity/Positioning Device C. Restraints: A. Bed rail was documented as 0. Not used.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

22 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA