Humphreys Co Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 44.3 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident representative (RR), Ombudsman, and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to communicate with a resident representative regarding discharge of a resident as evidenced by no notification of discharge provided to the resident/resident representative for (1) one of (3) three residents reviewed for transfer/discharge notice. (Resident #1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Discharge, revised 12/24, revealed. If a discharge is sought out by the facility, the resident and the resident representative will be given written notice. All discharges require documentation in the clinical record by the interdisciplinary [NAME] indicating the reason for the discharge that is consistent with the resident's assessment of discharge potential and change of condition, either physical or financial . In a phone interview with Resident #1's RR on 1/15/24 at 9:00 AM, she revealed that she was told on 12/09/24 by the previous Business Office Manager (BOM)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean ice machine as evidenced by multiple areas of a black substance inside the area that contained the ice for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Ice Maker & (and) Dispenser Cleaning Instructions with a revision date of 8/21, revealed under, Policy: Equipment shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Maintenance staff will perform cleaning. An observation of the ice machine on 12/10/24 at 9:44 AM revealed seven (7) irregular shaped black spots measuring approximately 5 inches in length, on a white plastic strip in the upper portion of the inside of ice maker that held the ice. An observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 12/10/24 at 10:26 AM confirmed there were black spots inside the ice machine and stated, No, it's not clean. She confirmed the ice was used for staff and residents and a dirty ice machine could make everyone sick. She revealed that maintenance was responsible for cleaning the ice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to submit accurate direct care staffing information to the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) for the fourth (4th) quarter of the fiscal year (FY) 2024 (July 1-September 30) for one (1) of four (4) PBJ quarter reports reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the typed statement on company letterhead dated 12/12/24 signed by the Administrator revealed that the facility does not have a policy on PBJ. A record review of the facility's PBJ Staffing Data Report for the 4th quarter of FY 2024 revealed that the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. In an interview on 12/11/24 at 2:00PM, the Administrator confirmed that the facility had not submitted accurate PBJ staffing data for the fourth quarter of FY 2024. The Administrator explained that they have a Case Manager who is a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) with administrative duties, but that she also has direct care duties. He explained that they did not accurately report the hours that this LPN worked administrative duties separate from her direct care duties. He…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was accurate in the physician orders for one (1) of 24 sampled residents. Resident # 31 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Advance Directives with a revision date of 7/15 revealed under, Procedure: . All staff providing care for the residents will: Review the Advance Directive and clarify any discrepancies between the Directive and current treatment plan. Record review of the Physician Order Details dated 8/27/24 revealed, Resident #31 was a full code. Record review of the Advance Directive Consent dated 9/11/24 revealed, Resident #31 signed a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) in case of cardiac arrest. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 on 12/11/24 at 10:40 AM revealed, in the event of an emergency they (the staff) look for the code status in the computer under the physician orders. She confirmed there was a discrepancy between the code status consent and the physician order, and that this discrepancy could cause confusion in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for discharge disposition for one (1) of 24 resident MDS assessments reviewed. Resident #47. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Resident Assessment, latest revision 09/19 revealed Any healthcare professional that completes a portion of the assessment must sign and certify the accuracy of the portion of the assessment that they have completed. Record review of the Discharge-Return Not Anticipated MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/18/24 for Resident #47 revealed Item A2105 Discharge Status was coded as Short-Term General Hospital. Record review of Progress Notes for Resident #47, dated 10/18/24 revealed Resident discharged home. An interview and record review of the 10/18/24 Discharge-Return Not Anticipated MDS and Progress Note for Resident #47 with MDS nurse on 12/11/24 at 2:47 PM, she confirmed that Resident #47 was discharged home and the MDS assessment was coded incorrectly. She stated the importance of coding the discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to submit a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) status change for a resident with a change in mental status for (1) one of four (4) residents reviewed for PASRR. Resident #38 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening PAS/PASRR revised 8/24 revealed, The facility is required to complete and submit Mississippi PASRR Level II Change in Status Request for residents with a Level II experiencing a significant change in status . indicators which may constitute a significant change and require submission of a Resident Review (Status Change) . includes residents previously identified by PASRR to have mental illness . who demonstrate increased behavioral, psychiatric, or mood-related symptoms . Record review of the Status Change Review Outcome report for Resident #38 dated 10/18/23, revealed no further PASRR was required unless a significant change occurs in behavioral health needs. Record review of the Departmental Notes for Resident #38 dated 2/16/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan for providing nail care for two (2) of 24 sampled residents. Resident #8 and #30. Findings include: A review of the facility's Care Plan Process policy, with a revision date of 08/17, revealed, Regulations require facilities to complete, at a minimum and at regular intervals, a comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity and needs, in relation to a number of specified areas (e.g., customary routine, vision, and continence).The care plan is driven not only by identified resident issues and/or conditions but also by a resident's unique characteristics, strengths, and needs. Resident #8 Record review of Resident #8's Care Plans with a problem onset date of 3/1/18 revealed under, Problem/Need: Resident requires extensive to total assistance with ADL (Activities of Daily Living) . Also revealed under, Approaches: . Assist with personal grooming as needed, nail, bathing, shaving etc . An observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record reviews and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to provide personal hygiene as evidenced by long, jagged nails with brown substance underneath nails for two (2) of 24 sampled residents. Resident #8 and #30. Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Nail Care, with a revision date of 07/10, revealed, Purpose .To promote cleanliness, safety and a neat appearance Resident #8 On 12/10/24 at 9:34 AM, observation revealed a left-hand contracture with long nails meeting the inner palm. The right-hand revealed long nails measuring approximately (3/8) three-eighths inches in length with a thick, black substance underneath the nails. On 12/11/24 at 9:36 AM, an observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #8 had long dirty nails. She revealed the nurses were responsible for cutting his nails because he was a diabetic. She revealed long nails, and the hand contracture could result in a wound inside the palm, or the resident could scratch himself and cause infection. Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for resident with an indwelling catheter for one (1) of two (2)residents with indwelling catheters. Resident # 10 Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Perineal Care, revision date 01/24 revealed Resident with Catheter: 4.) Using a clean washcloth or wash wipe, start at the meatus and wash the tubing in a circular motion away from the body. Rinse using the same method . An observation on 12/11/24 at 10:55 AM revealed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #2 performed hand hygiene, applied gloves and provided incontinent and catheter care to Resident #10. This observation revealed CNA #2 washed, rinsed and dried the urinary meatus and catheter tubing without hand hygiene and changing gloves between each aspect of care. In an interview with CNA #2 on 12/11/24 at 11:10 AM, she confirmed she failed to change her gloves and perform hand hygiene after cleaning the urinary meatus/catheter tubing area and then rinsing and drying the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to help prevent the possible transmission of infections when staff failed to perform hand hygiene during resident care observed for Resident #5 and #10 and failed to use Enhanced Barrier Pecautions (EBP) during catheter care for Resident #10 for two (2) of five (5) resident direct care areas observed. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Perineal Care, latest revision 01/24 revealed Purpose: To prevent infection . Resident with Catheter . 4.) Using a clean washcloth or wash wipe, start at the meatus and wash the tubing in a circular motion away from the body. Rinse using the same method. Review of the facility titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, latest revision 03/24 revealed that Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms in nursing homes. EBP involves gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. Example of high contact resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $127K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS