Landmark Of Desoto

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 156 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.78 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.50 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.91 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with pressure ulcers for two (2) of 20 sampled residents. Resident # 28 and Resident # 209 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plan Process with a revision date of 8/17 revealed, .The Care Plan must include measurable objectives and time frames and must describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . Resident #28 A review of the Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 9/19/24 revealed that Resident #28 acquired an unstageable pressure ulcer on the right fourth (4th) ring finger on 9/19/24. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/16/24 indicated that Resident #28 had a functional limitation in the range of motion (ROM) in the upper extremity on one side. A review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #28 showed that no pressure reduction interventions were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-10-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent pressure ulcers for two (2) of five (5) residents observed with pressure ulcers. Resident #28 and Resident # 209 Findings Included: Record review of facility policy Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment Intervention Guidelines, revised 10/22, revealed C. Protection from Fiction or Shear .4. Provide padding for casts, braces, splints, oxygen tubing, shoes etc. as needed to prevent friction. 5. Remove orthotics on a regular basis for skin inspection .Therapy Department Interventions .3. Explore possible therapy interventions for .c. Splinting/orthotic modifications . 1. Provide pressure ulcer topical treatments as ordered Resident #28 A review of the Skin & Wound Evaluation dated 9/19/24, revealed that Resident #28 acquired an unstageable pressure ulcer on the right fourth (4th) ring finger on 9/19/24. Record review revealed measurements of 1.4 centimeters (cm) area, 1.4 cm length, 1.3 cm width and depth not applicable (n/a). The quarterly Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0552 — widespread
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to the initiation of psychotropic medications for 5 (five) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #6, Resident #12, and Resident #38. Findings Include: Facility policy titled Psychotropic Medications, dated 02/25, stated, Consent for Anti-psychotic Medication Treatment shall be completed for new order of or increasing the dose of an anti-psychotic, psychoactive, or neuroleptic medication. The prescribing physician, or facility medical director shall complete Section I providing indications for use, diagnosis, risks, benefits, alternatives and course of therapy. Section II shall be completed by resident or resident representative. Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 2/13/26, Klonopin (anti-anxiety) 0.5 MG (milligram) oral tablet (Clonazepam) give 1 (one) tablet via PEG (percutaneous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the physician reviewed and responded to pharmacy recommendations for gradual dose reduction (GDR) and failed to ensure as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication orders included a stop date for four (4) of five (5) residents. (Residents #1, #6, #12, and #38) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for Psychotropic Medications with revision date of 11/17 revealed A Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) is a stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued. Within 1st (first) year after admission on psychotropic or after initiation: GDR in 2 (two) separate quarters, with at least one month between attempts. After 1st (first) year GDR annually Review of facility policy titled Psychotropic Medications with review date 2/2025, revealed, .as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was five (5) percent (%) or less for six (6) of thirty-three medication opportunities. Medication error rate of 18.18%.Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Administration of Medications revised 3/25 revealed under, Procedure . 3. Drugs and biologics are administered no more than one hour before or no more than one hour after the dosage time on the order. Also revealed under, Oral Medication Administration Procedure: . 3. Verify the physicians order, comparing the medication label to the MAR (Medication Administration Record) to verify the following:a. Right medicationb. Right dosagec. Right routed. Right timee. Right resident. Record review of Resident #17's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following medications were scheduled for administration at 9:00 AM: Lisinopril 10 milligrams (hypertension), Multivitamin liquid (supplement), Hydroxyzine 10 milligrams (anxiety), Metformin 500 milligrams (diabetes), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have the call light accessible for Resident #30, this was for one (1) of 24 residents reviewed. Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled, Resident Call Light System, dated 07/25, revealed, A call light system is in place and operative in facility. This system allows individual residents to access a system that notifies nursing that the resident has a need . An observation and interview on 03/17/2026 at 10:50 AM observed Resident #30 lying in her bed and alert to name being called. A fall mat was on the floor next to the bed with bed in the lowest position. Observed a sign above the bed reminding resident to call for assistance, Please call, don't fall. Use the call button for assistance. Observed that call light was not within reach. Interview with the resident at that same time, asked if she knew what to do if she needed help and resident stated, I push the red button. Interview and observation on 03/17/26 at 10:56 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 stated resident is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of resident assessments by inaccurately completing section H (bowel and bladder) of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) of 18 sampled residents. Resident #11.Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Assessment, revised 9/19, revealed, An assessment will be completed on each resident utilizing the MDS (Minimum Data Set). The reason for the assessment, schedule, and timeframes will be according to the guidance of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. An observation conducted on 3/17/26 at 11:29 AM revealed Resident #11 lying in bed with a urinary catheter drainage bag attached to the lower portion of the bed frame. Record review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/19/25 revealed under Section H (Bladder and Bowel), item H0100 an indwelling catheter was not indicated. Record review of Resident #11's December Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed an order dated 7/7/25, Change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT) reviewed and revised the resident's comprehensive care plan to reflect changes in the resident's condition for one (1) of eighteen (18) residents reviewed. (Resident #18)Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Care Plan Process with review date 3/26, revealed, Regulations require facilities to complete, at a minimum and at regular intervals, a comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity and needs, in relation to several specified areas.The comprehensive care plan is an interdisciplinary communication tool. The IDT will minimally include the attending physician, Registered Nurse (RN) with responsibility for the care of the resident, a nurse aide with responsibility for the resident, a member of food and nutrition services staff, the resident and the resident's representative (s) to the extent practicable, and any other disciplines as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide services to maintain or improve range of motion by not ensuring a physician ordered splint was applied daily for 1 (one) of 2 (two) residents reviewed. Resident #17. Findings Included:Record review of the facility policy Range of Motion with revision date of 01/24, revealed that the purpose was To improve or maintain joint mobility and muscle strength and To prevent contractures Observations on 03/17/25 at 10:55 AM and on 03/18/26 at 8:15 AM revealed Resident #17 lying in bed, he was non-verbal with his eyes open. His right hand was contracted and there was no wrist splint device in place. It was observed that there was a hand splint on the seat of the wheelchair that was against the wall. An interview and observation on 03/18/26 at 1:50 PM with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, revealed that they only had one resident requiring hand splints in the facility. She revealed that Resident #17 had received therapy services in the past and they had put a hand splint on him but since he had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper positioning and management of an indwelling urinary catheter drainage system for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for urinary catheter. Resident #11 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Perineal Care, revised 1/24, revealed under Resident with Catheter: . 7. Ensure tubing is not positioned above the level of the bladder.An observation conducted on 3/17/26 at 11:29 AM revealed Resident #11 lying in bed with a urinary catheter drainage bag attached to the lower portion of the bed frame.Record review of Resident #11's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 7/3/25, Foley catheter care Q (every) shift and PRN (as needed).During an observation of catheter care provided to Resident #11 by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 and Registered Nurse (RN) #1 on 3/18/26 at 11:00 AM, the urinary drainage bag was removed from the lower bed frame and placed in the bed with the resident during catheter care. This positioning resulted in urinary backflow from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulins were properly stored in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines to maintain safety and effectiveness for one (1) of two (2) medication carts observed. 300 hall Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage, revised 11/17, revealed, Storage, supplies and equipment necessary for appropriate temperatures and conditions per the manufacturer's specifications.An observation of the 300 hall medication cart on 3/18/26 at 9:45 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, revealed the following insulins were in use and either exceeded the manufacturer's 28-day room temperature storage limit or were not dated when opened:Resident #2 - Open vial of Novolog that was undated.Resident #3 - Open vial of Humalog dated 12/23/25.Resident #17 - Open vial of Insulin Aspart that was undated.Resident #51 - Humalog KwikPen that was undated. Record review of the manufacturer's storage instructions for Humalog and Novolog (Insulin Aspart) revealed that once…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to properly disinfect a glucometer after use, in accordance with infection control standards during one (1) of 6 (six) medication administration passes observed and failed to ensure contact precautions were in place for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for infection control. Resident #30.Findings Included: Review of the facility policy Infection Control Policy for General Cleaning and Maintenance of Equipment with revision date of 02/26 revealed that .Critical and invasive resident care devices (e.g. (exempli gratia), glucometers) shall be cleaned and disinfected per manufacturers' recommendations Record Review of Policy for Control of Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO) Infection,latest review date 08/21 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to place residents in contact and/or droplet precautions if they are displaying symptoms of active multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infection An infection is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,527 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $5,263 — penalty dated 2024-10-30
• $5,264 — penalty dated 2024-10-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 45 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $576K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS