Copiah Living Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 51.0 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident right to respectful, dignified care as evidenced by staff failed to position themselves at the resident's side while assisting the resident with eating for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #2 Findings included:Record review of the facility policy, Tray Setup for Resident Who Will Dine Independently with Latest Review Date 01/24 (January 2024) PURPOSE To ensure that the resident obtains sufficient nourishment and fluids.7. Provide beverage from meal tray. 8. Be attentive to resident's needs during the meal: offer appropriate assistance as needed.Record review of the facility policy revealed, Feeding the Dependent Resident with latest review date 01/24 (January 2024) revealed the policy stated, PURPOSE To ensure adequate nutrition for resident who are unable to feed themselves.PROCEDURE.Ensure that resident is seated comfortable in upright position.Record review of the facility policy Resident's Rights Policy with latest review date 03/24 (March 2024)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to promote dignity for a resident during dining as evidenced by a resident was observed unsafely positioned during a meal and the call light was out of reach for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy Call Light/Bell with the latest review date 01/24 (January 2024) revealed PURPOSE To provide the resident a means of communication with staff members.PROCEDURE 1. Ensure resident has call light in reach when in resident room.7. Place the call light within the resident's reach before leaving the room .Record review of the facility policy, Tray Setup for Resident Who Will Dine Independently with Latest Review Date 01/24 (January 2024) PURPOSE To ensure that the resident obtains sufficient nourishment and fluids.7. Provide beverage from meal tray. 8. Be attentive to resident's needs during the meal: offer appropriate assistance as needed.Record review of the facility policy Feeding the Dependent Resident with the latest review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent residents received appropriate care and services to prevent the possibility of urinary tract infection for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for perineal care, Resident #20 and Resident #38. This deficiency was also cited on the last Recertification Survey, therefore the scope/severity was increased to E representing a pattern. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Perineal Care, revised 1/24, revealed, Purpose to cleanse the perineum, eliminate odor, prevent irritation and to enhance the resident's dignity and self-esteem . Female-without catheter .5. Wash genital area, moving from front to back, while using a clean portion of the washcloth or pre-moistened wash wipe for each stroke . Male without catheter .5. Using the other hand gently cleanse from the tip to the base of the penis. Use a clean portion of the washcloth or pre-moisturized wash wipe after each stroke . Resident #20 A record review of Resident #20's admission Record revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to sustain corrective actions to prevent recurrence of previously cited deficiencies, specifically, the facility was cited for failing to ensure an incontinent resident received appropriate care and services to prevent the possibility of a urinary tract infection and failed to ensure infection control measures were consistently implemented to prevent the development and/or transmission of infection during an annual recertification survey on 11/2/2023. The facility was cited again for the same deficiencies during the current survey, demonstrating that QAPI failed to sustain ongoing monitoring and oversight to prevent recurrence for two (2) of five (5) deficiencies cited. F690 and F880 Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) with a revision date of 11/22 revealed, This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data driven Quality…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during the provision of perineal care for two (2) of two (2) residents observed for perineal care, Resident #20 and Resident #38, as evidenced by not performing hand hygiene, using gloves inappropriately stored in pockets, continuing care with soiled gloves, and retrieving wipes from the packet with contaminated gloves, placing residents at risk for cross-contamination and infection. This deficiency was also cited on the last Recertification Survey, therefore the scope/severity was increased to E representing a pattern. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 8/21, revealed, This facility has developed and maintains an infection prevention and control program that provides a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection . A review of the facility's policy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights for respect and dignity, as evidenced by staff entering resident rooms and providing care while using personal cell phones and wearing earbuds, which residents described as rude and disrespectful. This deficient practice affected two (2) of 18 sampled residents, Resident #4 and Resident #43. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy, Resident's Rights, dated 3/24, revealed, Every resident in this facility has the right to .12. Be treated courteously, fairly and with the fullest measure of dignity . Resident #4 On 5/8/25 at 9:28 AM, during an interview with Resident #4, she confirmed her concerns shared during the Resident Council meeting and explained that staff often entered her room while on the phone or wearing earbuds. She stated that she felt this was disrespectful and rude. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #4 on 3/11/21 with diagnoses including Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation. A record review of the Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code antipsychotic medications on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents, Resident #17. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Resident Assessment, revised 9/19, revealed, An assessment will be completed on each resident utilizing the MDS .The Registered Nurse is responsible for the completion of the assessment. The completed assessment guide the staffing in identifying key information about the resident and serves as a basis for identifying resident specific issues and objectives in order to develop a care plan. This process assists the resident in reaching the highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being . A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #17 on 4/23/21 and she had current diagnoses including Schizoaffective Disorder. A record review of the Comprehensive MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/10/25, revealed Resident #17 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure items in the kitchen refrigerators, freezers, and dry storage room were dated, labeled, and discarded by the expiration date for one (1) of three (3) dietary observations. This has a potential to affect all residents receiving meals prepared by the facility's dietary department. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage Labeling, with a revision date of 05/18, revealed, Policy: The facility will ensure the safety and quality of food by following good storage and labeling procedures. Procedure: 1. Labeling a. All temperature-controlled foods and ready-to-eat foods prepared in the facility and held for longer than twenty-four hours will be labeled. Information included on the label: Name of the food, Date of storage . 3. Rotation .b. Food stored in storage units will be surveyed routinely to identify and discard foods that have passed its manufacturer's use-by date or expiration date. Suggested time frames: Dry storage - Weekly, Refrigerator storage- Weekly .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and facility policy review the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to ensure the program was sustained during transitions in leadership and failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions the committee put into place in November 2021. This was for one (1) recited deficiency originally cited in November 2021, on an annual recertification survey. The deficiency was in the area of Infection Control for failure to perform hand hygiene during perineal care. The facility's continued failure during two federal surveys shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAPI Committee. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy, QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Introduction and Purpose, with a revision date of 08/15, revealed . The QAPI program has been developed to incorporate the Continuous Quality and Quality Assurance (QA) process consisting of ongoing analysis of clinical data and program results, identifying and prioritizing opportunities for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were consistently implemented to prevent the development and/or transmission of infection for two (2) of 17 sampled residents. Residents #26 and #33 Findings include: Record review of facility's policy, Hand Hygiene, with a revision date of 8/21, revealed, PURPOSE To cleanse hands to prevent transmission of infection or other conditions. To provide clean health environment for residents, staff, and visitor . INDICATIONS FOR HAND WASHING . 3. Before and after procedures 4. Before and after applying gloves . 9. Wearing gloves does not replace the need to perform hand hygiene . Resident #26 On 10/31/23 at 2:50 PM, an observation of Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #2 performing perineal care for Resident #26 revealed she did not perform hand hygiene prior to applying gloves. After she applied gloves and before beginning care, the resident's call light fell on the floor and the CNA picked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $484K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS