Lawrence Co Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 57.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the resident's pain to reflect actual pain instead of at risk for pain for one (1) of seventeen (17) residents reviewed for pain. Resident #44. Findings include: Record review of the facility's Care Plan Process, with a revision date of 12/24, revealed The results of the assessment, which must accurately reflect the resident's status and needs, are to be used to review and revise each resident's comprehensive person-centered plan of care. Record review of Resident #44 ' s Care Plan Report with a date initiated of 12/5/24 revealed Focus: The resident IS AT RISK FOR PAIN. This care plan had not been revised to reflect Resident #44's ACTUAL pain. On 03/30/25 at 11:35 AM, during an observation and interview, Resident #44 stated he is in constant pain due to skin cancer. Resident #44's right arm was wrapped in Kerlix. He stated they only give him Tylenol and that it does not help. He described the pain as feeling like ants are biting him and stated he is in pain all the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-04-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to manage the resident's pain to the extent possible in accordance with professional standards and the resident's goals and preferences for one (1) of seventeen (17) residents reviewed for pain, Resident #44. Findings include: Record review of the facility's Pain Screen and Management policy, with a revision date of 12/23, revealed: All residents who experience routine pain receive a comprehensive pain screening and a treatment plan until acceptable level of pain relief is achieved. All residents have the right to treatment for pain. Resident preferences are respected when deciding on methods to be used for pain management. The residents' statements are the most valid measurements of pain. 4.b New or changed medication orders are transcribed per facility standards of practice and a clinical note is documented 4.d. When the resident is medicated with the prescribed medication or treated as ordered, documentation of medication or treatment is done on the electronic Treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity, respect, privacy, and received necessary assistance with personal care in accordance with resident rights as evidenced by Resident #27 was unnecessarily exposed during catheter care and Resident #47 was denied requested assistance with drying beneath her breasts following a shower, resulting in prolonged moisture and a rash for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents for residents rights. (Resident #27 and Resident #47)Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy Residents Rights Policy with a revision date of 05/26 revealed, Every resident in this facility has the right to.11. Receive adequate care and appropriate healthcare, medical treatment and protective support services. 12. Be treated courteously, fairly and with fullest measures of dignity.17. Be treated with consideration and respect for their personal privacy including but not limited to. have facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were permitted to receive unopened mail and packages and failed to protect residents' rights to privacy and confidentiality for three (3) of (3) residents interviewed regarding receipt of mail (Residents #3, #9, and #32). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility who received mail or packages.Finding include: Record review of the facility policy, Resident Rights Policy, with a revision date of 5/26, revealed, Every resident in the facility has the right to: 17. Be treated with consideration and respect for their personal privacy .19. Receive unopened private mail .During an interview on 6/16/26 at 2:00 PM, the Activities Director mentioned that she had opened mail addressed to residents in the past. She explained that she was instructed to do so to ensure that residents were not ordering items that could be hazardous to their health. Additionally, she noted that she had been informed it was acceptable for nursing staff to open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure physician orders contained complete and accurate medication dosage instructions for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident #28). Findings Include:A record review of the facility policy Oral Medication Administration Procedure with a revision dated of 03/25 revealed, .2. Ensure that an appropriate physician's order is in place.Verify.b. right dosage. On 06/17/26 at 8:05 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 was observed administering medications to Resident #28. During the observation, the physician order for Vitamin D3 was reviewed and directed staff to give one tablet daily. The order did not contain a dosage strength. LPN #2 administered (1) Vitamin D3 125 mcg (microgram) tablet to Resident #28.On 06/17/26 at 8:08 AM, LPN #2 was interviewed regarding the medication administration. LPN #2 stated there were two Vitamin D products available on the medication cart.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate perineal care and in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for personal hygiene care (Resident #45). Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy Perineal Care with a revision date of 01/24 revealed .Preparing For Care.6. Perform hand hygiene and apply gloves . 5. Wash genital area, moving from front to back while using a clean portion of the washcloth or pre-moistened wash wipe for each stroke. 6. When soap is used, rinse genital area rinsing area moving front to back using a clean portion of the washcloth or premoistened wash wipe for each stroke. 7. Dry genital area moving from front to back with towel. 8. Assist the resident to turn onto side facing away from you with leg slightly bent at the knee. 9. With a new washcloth or premoistened wash wipe, clean the anal area from front to back using a clean area of the washcloth or premoistened wash wipe after each stroke. 10. When soap…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate food preferences for one (1) of (15) residents reviewed for food and nutrition services. (Resident #32). Findings Include:On 06/15/26 at 12:09 PM, during an interview, Resident #32 stated she had requested two (2) boiled eggs, (2) slices of bacon, and oatmeal for breakfast. Resident #32 stated she spoke with the Dietary Manager (DM), who agreed to provide the requested breakfast items. The resident stated she only received the requested breakfast one time after making the request.On 06/16/26 at 11:20 AM, during an interview, Resident #32 stated she was served (1) slice of bacon, scrambled eggs, (1) slice of toast, and oatmeal. Resident #32 stated (2) boiled eggs were handwritten on her tray card but were not included on her meal tray. Resident #32 stated she wanted the breakfast items she had requested.On 06/17/26 at 7:53 AM, an observation of Resident #32's breakfast tray revealed grits, scrambled eggs, sausage patty, and biscuits. The tray did not contain bacon, oatmeal, or boiled eggs as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the possibility of spreading infection during perineal care for one (1) of four (4) care observations. Resident #45. Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy Hand Hygiene with a revision date of 01/24 revealed Purpose: To cleanse hands to prevent transmission of infection or other conditions. To provide clean health environment for residents, staff and visitors .Procedure. 2. Hand hygiene should be performed between all contacts with residents or when entering and exiting a resident's room. 3. Before and after procedures 3. Before and after applying gloves.Record review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precaution signage revealed EVERYONE MUST Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Wear gloves and a gown for the following high contact Resident Care Activities . Changing briefs or assisting with toileting.Record review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) with a revision date of 3/24 revealed . EBP involves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide wound care in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician's orders, specifically failing to cleanse wounds with proper technique and dry wounds prior to dressing application, and placing a resident (Resident #2) in two (2) briefs, which increased the risk for skin breakdown and infection, for (2) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for wound care (Residents #2 and #3).Findings include:A record review of the facility's Dressing Change Policy and Procedure with a review date of 8/21 revealed, .Steps in the Procedure.14. Dry the skin surrounding the area by patting with a soft 4 X (by) 4.Resident #2On 9/4/25 at 9:50 AM, an observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 providing wound care revealed Resident #2 was wearing two briefs. LPN #1 removed the soiled dressing and cleansed the hip wound by wiping back and forth across the wound bed multiple times with the same gauze rather than discarding it after a single pass. A second gauze was used in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions during wound care for two (2) of (2) wound care observations (Residents #2 and #3).Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Care Plan Process, with a review date of 12/24, revealed, .The comprehensive care plan is an interdisciplinary communication tool.The facility staff shall follow the care plan.Resident #2A record review of the Order Summary Report revealed Resident #2 had a physician's order, dated 7/4/25, to Cleanse excoriated area to the right hip with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Santyl ointment . and Hydrofera blue classic daily to the wound. Secure with adhesive foam until healed. There was also an order, dated 8/22/25, to Cleanse stage 3 pressure ulcer to sacrum with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Santyl, gentamicin 0.1%, nystatin powder, calcium alginate and cover with border foam dressing daily.A record review of the Care Plan Report revealed a Resident #2 had Interventions including .Cleanse Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer to Sacrum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control practices by placing wound care supplies on an undisinfected bedside table during treatment, creating the potential for cross-contamination and infection, for one (1) of two (2) wound care observations (Resident #3).Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Infection Control, revised 4/21, revealed The facility will maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment with minimal exposure to the transmission of disease and infection.On 9/4/25 at 10:35 AM, during an observation of wound care provided to Resident #3's sacral wound, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 entered the resident's room with supplies carried on a white disposable barrier. She placed the barrier on the foot of the resident's bed, then placed a bottle of hand sanitizer and clean gloves directly on the resident's bedside table without disinfecting the surface. LPN #1 donned (put on) gloves, then removed the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, facility statement review and Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) data review, the provider failed to ensure their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ)-which includes information on the staffing hours necessary for the appropriate care of the residents-was corrected prior to submission to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for one (1) of four (4) quarters in 2024. (October 1-December 31.) Findings include: Record review of a statement of facility letterhead, undated, and signed by the facility Administrator, revealed There has been an upgrade to the timeclock system which has created some glitches that may have caused reporting issues. During an interview with the Human Resources Director on April 2, 2025, at 2:30 PM, she stated that nursing hours are automatically sent to the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) when staff clock in. She reported that she only enters agency nursing hours and does not have direct access to the PBJ or receive any notifications regarding submission errors. On April 2, 2025, at 2:45 PM, the Administrator stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,868 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $5,434 — penalty dated 2025-04-02
• $5,434 — penalty dated 2025-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $427K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS