Senior Village Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 35.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 127.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) was attempted or a clinical rationale for not reducing psychotropic medication recommended for GDR for 1 (#2) out of 5 (#1, #2, #4, #7, and #99) residents sampled for unnecessary medication review.Findings: A review of Resident #2's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included in part, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and depression.A review of Resident #2's Pharmaceutical Consultant Report dated 10/24/2025 and signed by S2DON (Director of Nursing) read in part, Please evaluate the routine use of the following psychoactive medications and consider a dose reduction. If a dose reduction is not desired, please indicate below a rationale for the continued use. This resident is prescribed the following psychoactive medications:Benadryl 25 mg (milligrams) q6hrs prn itching (every 6 hours as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman of emergency transfers in writing for 1 (#7) out of 4 (#7, #62, #89, #105) residents reviewed for accidents. Findings:Review of Resident #7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the EMR revealed Resident #7 had an emergency transfer to a local hospital on [DATE].Review of the facility's Ombudsman notification lists of emergency transfers dated July 2025 and August 2025, failed to reveal Resident #7's transfer on 08/20/2025 and there was no further evidence the Ombudsman had been notified of the transfer. On 12/03/2025 at 12:45 p.m., a concurrent record review and interview was conducted with S1AADM (Assistant Administrator). S1AADM stated that she was partially responsible for the accuracy of the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman list of emergency transfers. S1AADM reviewed the emergency transfer forms and confirmed they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #1, and Resident #43) residents out of 41 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed an admission date to facility on 05/28/2025 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms; and bipolar disorder, severe, with psychotic features. Review of Resident #1's Form 142 dated 05/08/2025 and 08/16/2025 revealed the resident was approved for admission by Level II authority. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) 06/05/2025 revealed: Section A1500 PASARR: the answer was no to the question, Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or related condition? Review of Resident #1's Significant Change MDS with an ARD 08/08/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive careplan for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #62) of 41 sampled residents as evidenced by failing to: 1. ensure physician orders were implemented for wound care for Resident #4 and 2. develop a careplan for bed rails for Resident #62Findings:Review of Resident #4's electronic health record revealed an admission date of 06/24/2021 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, age-related osteoporosis, cognitive communication deficit, and hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy. Review of Resident #4's TAR (Treatment Administration Record) for September 2025, October 2025, and November 2025 revealed an order dated 09/07/2025 for Cleanse excoriated area to left buttock with normal saline, and apply zinc oxide bid (twice a day) until resolved. Further review of Resident #4's TARs failed to reveal nurses initials or evidence that treatments were performed on the following dates: 1. September 2025 a. AM- 09/10/2025 and 09/15/2025 b. HS (at bedtime) - 09/07/2025, 09/18/2025, 09/21/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #16) out of 41 sampled residents. Findings:Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Process, with a last reviewed dated of 12/2024, revealed in part, Regulations require facilities to complete, at a minimum and at regular intervals, a comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity and needs, in relation to a number of specified areas (e.g., customary routine, vision and continence). The results of the assessment, which must accurately reflect the resident's status and needs, are to be used to develop, review, and revise each resident's comprehensive person-centered plan of care. The RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) will be used to determine guidelines for revisions and completion dates for the Comprehensive Care Plan.Review of the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) RAI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate administration of all drugs by failing to administer the correct dose of Zinc for 1 (Resident #79) out of 4 residents observed form medication administration. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Administration of Medications which was last reviewed on 03/2025, read in part, Oral Medication Administration Procedure, 3. Verify the physicians order, comparing the medication label to the MAR (Medication Administration Record) to verify the following, b. right dosage. Review of Resident #79's health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses which included, but were not limited to chronic kidney disease and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Review of Nursing Home Progress Note on 11/17/2025 for Resident #79 revealed a physician order for Zinc Sulfate 220 mg (milligrams) one by mouth once a day.Review of Resident #79's MAR (Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Residents #1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 126. Findings: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included but not limited to Unspecified Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Anorexia, Aphasia and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of Resident #3's Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/20/2025 revealed he had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 03, indicating he was severely, cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #3's current active physician's orders revealed an order with a start date of 05/19/2025 that read in part, Check oxygen saturation every shift. If less than 92% administer as needed oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #3's MAR (medication administration record) for May 2025 and June 2025 revealed no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that an injury of unknown origin was reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours to State Survey Agency after discovering or learning of the injury for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Residents #1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 126 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy with a review date of 05/24 titled Incident Investigation and Reporting, read in part; Injury of Unknown Origin: When all criteria are met: Source of injury was not observed by any person and the source of injury could not be explained by the resident, and the injury is suspicious due to the extent or location of the injury 3. The administrator shall report to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement entities in which the facility is located, any allegation or reasonable suspicion of a crime against any resident. The administrator shall report no later than 2 hours after forming the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-10 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate payroll information for direct care staffing as required. Finding: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 3 2024 (April 1- June 30) revealed triggers for Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. Review of the facility's Staff Reporting Forms provided from April to June 2024, revealed in part: Weekdays (Monday-Friday) were noted to have between 3 -6 RN's (Registered Nurses), and 7-9 LPN's (Licensed Practical Nurses), whereas the weekends (Saturday-Sunday) had 1 RN and 4 LPN's for the Day shifts. On 09/10/2024 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON (Director of Nursing), with S10ADM (Administrator) present. S3DON reported that PBJ staffing was done between S9AA (Administrative Assistant) and Corporate Human Resources. S3DON and S10ADM denied knowledge of any low staffing on weekends and stated the state requirements for staffing ratios were met. S10ADM reported S9AA was having issues with the imputing contract/agency staff in the PBJ…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-10 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted within 14 days after completion for 8 (# 8, #10, #23, #45, #67, #105, #112, and #122) out of 9 ( (# 8, #9, #10, #23, #45, #67, #105, #112, and #122) residents reviewed for resident assessments submission activities. Findings: Resident # 45 Review of Resident #45's Quarterly MDS, with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 07/25/2024, revealed it was completed on 08/08/2024, and transmitted on 09/09/2024. Resident # 10 Review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS, with ARD of 08/06/2024, revealed it was completed on 08/20/2024, and transmitted on 09/06/2024. On 09/10/24 at 8:30 a.m., an interview and review of Resident #45 and #10's Quarterly MDS was conducted with S7MDS. She verified Resident #45's and #10's Quarterly MDS completion date and transmission date. She confirmed that the Quarterly MDS assessments were not transmitted within the required timeframe of 14 days after completion. Resident # 8 Review of Resident #8's Discharge -return not anticipated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

22 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA