No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Tunica County Health & Rehab, LLC

1024 Highway 61 South, Tunica, MS 38676 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (662) 363-3164 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (662) 363-3164 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
3 actual-harm citations2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$44,252 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $44,252 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-01)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
504 Pecan · (870) 338-9244 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1337 Highway 61 N · (662) 363-1431 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1041 Highway 61 S · (662) 363-2486 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.0%20.5%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.9%1.6%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.3%19.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.0%23.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%97.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.7%6.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.5%20.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.4%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.5%27.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.1%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.742.431.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.862.861.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
38.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 38.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.4–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge38.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.4–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.471.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
23.6%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 48.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.05 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.53 on weekdays — 31% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-01)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans to address identified care needs. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of (53) residents reviewed for care planning. (Residents #6 and #33). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last revised December 2016, revealed: Policy Statement: A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . Resident # 6 On 9/29/25 at 1:30 PM, Resident #6 was observed lying in bed with her left leg bent at an approximate 90-degree angle at the knee. The resident stated she was unable to straighten her leg and that it was stuck in that position. She denied receiving range of motion (ROM) exercises or splinting of her left leg. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-10-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate services to prevent an avoidable decline and the development of a contracture for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for range of motion (ROM). Resident #6. (Cross-reference- F825) Findings included: Review of the facility policy Functional Impairment-Clinical Protocol, revised April 2013, revealed Assessment and Recognition .2.The staff will identify individuals with a significant decline in function, including ability to perform activities of daily living .Treatment/Management .2.In conjunction with the physician and staff, therapist will propose a rehabilitation or restorative care plan that provides an appropriate intensity, frequency and duration of interventions to help achieve anticipated goals and expected outcomes efficiently using available resources . Review of the facility policy Range of Motion Exercises, undated, revealed The purpose of this procedure is to exercise the resident's joints and muscles . On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-10-01 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure timely provision of therapy services for one (1) of three (3) resident reviewed for contractures (Resident #6). Cross-reference- F688 Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Scheduling Therapy Services revised July 2013, revealed Policy Statement, Therapy Services shall be scheduled in accordance with the resident's treatment plan . Record review of the Nursing/Therapy Communication Form dated 7/16/25 documented a request for physical and occupational therapy for Resident #6 due to complaints of left leg stiffness. Further review of the Physical Therapy (PT) Evaluation and Plan of Treatment revealed that therapy did not evaluate the resident until 7/31/25, which was (15) days after the consultation was initiated. An interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 10/1/25 at 9:45 AM, confirmed that therapy was consulted on 7/16/25 when the resident was complaining of leg stiffness. She verified that at the time of the referral; the resident's knee was slightly bent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan regarding the use of a total lift for one (1) of three (3) resident care plans reviewed. (Resident #1) On 2/5/25 Resident #1, who required a total mechanical lift for all transfers, was manually transferred by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The resident sustained a right tibia fracture. Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revision date of 03/2022 revealed under, Policy .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . Review of the facility policy titled, Lifting Machine, Using a Portable with a revision date of 08/2022 revealed under Preparation .review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident . Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed ensure a resident was free from accident hazards when a resident was transferred from her chair to the bed incorrectly. The resident sustained a right tibia fracture. This was for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accidents. Resident #1 Findings include Review of the facility policy titled, Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents with a revision date of 07/2017 revealed under, Policy Statement .In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents . Record review of the facility investigation for the incident involving Resident #1 revealed that at approximately 6:45 PM on 2/5/25 Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #2 informed Resident #1's nurse that the resident needed something for pain. The nurse stated that the resident complained of right knee pain. The resident's nurse administered Tylenol 325 mg (milligrams) 2 tablets. At that time the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served under sanitary conditions and failed to label and store food properly for one (1) of three (3) kitchen tours. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, 005 Food Preparation Service revised October 2017, revealed, Policy Statement: Food and nutrition services employees shall prepare and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices .Food Service Distribution .23. Food and nutrition services staff shall wear hair restraints (hair net, bat, beard restraint, etc.) so that hair does not contact food . Review of the facility policy titled, 006 Food Receiving Storage revised October 2017, revealed, Policy Statement: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .8. All food stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date). Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage Labeling reviewed: 3/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by not repairing or reporting leaking air-conditioning (AC) units in two (2) of 30 resident rooms reviewed. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Findings included: Record review of the facility policy Quality of Life-Homelike Environment revised April 2014, revealed Policy Statement: Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/29/25 at 11:05 AM, revealed a sheet on the floor pushed under the AC unit. An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/29/25 at 11:45 AM revealed a sheet and blanket on the floor under the AC unit. A follow-up observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] and 131 on 9/30/25 at 8:30 AM, revealed both rooms continued to have sheets and a blanket pushed under the AC units. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) on 9/30/35 at 1:46 PM verified that the sheet remained on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) of (24) resident assessments reviewed (Resident #2).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Certified Accuracy, last revised December 2009, revealed Policy Statement: All personnel who complete any portion of the Resident Assessment (MDS) must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment . Record review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #2 dated 8/20/25 revealed Section P0100 (Restraints) coded Bed rail used daily. Record review of the restraint assessment form RESTRAINT-PHYSICAL dated 8/18/25 for Resident #2 revealed No restraints used at this time. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 1:55 PM, the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident #2 used bilateral side rails to aid in mobility and define bed boundaries, and these were not considered restraints. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 2:16 PM, the MDS nurse confirmed Resident # 2 had been assessed for side rail use, and the side rails were not restraints. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fingernail care was provided for one (1) of (53) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Resident #33). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care of Fingernails/Toenails, last revised October 2010, revealed: Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections . On 9/29/25 at 10:45 AM, Resident #33's fingernails were observed to be long and dirty. They were approximately 1/2 inch long past the tips of his finger and had a thick, dark brown substance under the nail beds. During an interview at this time, the resident stated he felt his nails were too long and dirty and reported he had not received any nail care since admission. An observation and interview on 9/30/25 at 1:06 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed Resident #33's fingernails were long with a dark buildup under the beds. She confirmed the nails required attention and stated failure to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the provider of a change in a resident's status, when a resident refused her medications two or more consecutive times for (1) one of (7) seven residents with medication regimen review. Resident #46 Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised February 2014, revealed, the nurse supervisor/charge nurse will notify the resident's attending physician when there has been a refusal of treatment or medications (i.e., (example) two (2) or more consecutive times). Review of the E-Medication Administration Record (EMAR) from June 4th -June 17th for Resident #46, revealed Cosopt eye drops: instill one drop to both eyes twice daily for Glaucoma-(6) six refused doses. Docusate Sodium 100 (mg) milligram twice daily for prevention of constipation-12 refused doses. Pepcid 20 mg one tablet twice daily for GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease) -(5) five refused doses. Aspirin 81 mg one tablet daily for history of CVA (Cerebral Vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a fall risk care plan when staff transferred a resident in a mechanical lift with only one (1) staff assist when the resident required the assistance of two (2) staff members for 1 of 16 residents care plans reviewed. (Resident # 1) Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Care Plans-Comprehensive, revealed Policy Statement: An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for each resident. Record review of a care plan for Resident #1 with a problem/need of Resident is at risk for falls (r/t) related to Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) with left hemiparesis, and muscle weakness. Resident has had an increase in fall risk (d/t) due to the decline in cognition as exhibited by (AEB) unable to recall that resident can't stand and walk, Approaches include Transfer Resident using the Vander-Lift x (times) 2 staff members. Record review of the incident report dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement interventions to reduce the risk of accidents and hazards when staff transferred a resident in a mechanical lift with only one (1) staff assist, when the resident required the assistance of two (2) staff members for 1 of three (3) residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. (Resident # 1) Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Lifting Machine, Using a Portable, revised February 2014, revealed two (2) nursing assistants are required to perform the procedure. Record review of the incident report dated 6/14/24 at 7:04 PM for Resident #1, revealed while Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) was transferring the resident with the lift, the resident became unstable due to being combative with care, and was assisted to the floor in an attempt to prevent a fall. The nurse assessed a small, reddened area noted to the left knee. Resident #1 was lifted from the floor via lift x (times) four (4) staff members and placed in a wheelchair. An interview with CNA #3 on 6/18/24 at 9:00 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to communicate pertinent resident information with a contracted End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) facility, when a dialysis resident had refused medications two (2) or more consecutive times for one (1) of three (3) dialysis residents reviewed. Resident #46 Findings include: Cross reference F580 Review of the policy titled , End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with, revealed agreements between this facility and the contracted ESRD facility include all aspects of how the resident's care will be managed, including the facility will share pertinent information with the dialysis unit on residents per communication. Review of the E-Medication Administration Record (EMAR) from June 4th -June 17th for Resident #46, revealed Cosopt eye drops: instill one drop to both eyes twice daily for Glaucoma-(6) six refused doses. Docusate Sodium 100 (mg) milligram twice daily for prevention of constipation-12 refused doses. Pepcid 20 mg one tablet twice daily for GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety as evidenced by failure to maintain the cleanliness of a resident's personal refrigerator for one (1) of 16 resident refrigerators observed. Resident #8. Findings include: A record review of the facility policy titled, Food brought by Family/Visitors/Outside Sources, revised January 2018, revealed foods requiring refrigeration may be stored in a resident's personal refrigerator. A designated employee will be assigned the following task, keeping the refrigerator clean and free from spills. A record review of the facilities Night shift wheelchair and refrigerator schedule revealed Thursday, clean refrigerators in your assigned group. An observation of Resident #8's refrigerator with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 6/18/24 at 10:00 AM, revealed 1 quarter sized and two (2) nickel sized black spots were noted in the top compartment of the refrigerator door and numerous small black spots were covering the entire…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident Representative and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to notify a Resident Representative of a change in status of a resident resulting in hospitalization for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed with changes in mental/physical condition. Resident #1 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revealed, Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status . A phone interview with the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #1 on 12/27/23 at 10:30 AM, revealed the hospital called him on 12/7/23 stating his dad was to be discharged at 10:00 AM and that he was admitted on [DATE] for changes in his mental status. He also revealed he was unaware that his dad had even been sent to the hospital, so he called and spoke with the Director of Nursing (DON) at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to clean the ice machine that served the residents and staff as evidenced by five (5) spots of a black substance on the ice inside the ice machine for one (1) of three (3) survey days. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Ice Machines and Ice Storage Chests with a revision date of April 2012 revealed under Policy Statement .Ice-making machines and ice storage/distribution containers will be used and maintained to assure a safe and sanitary supply of ice. Record review revealed a typed statement from the Administrator that the facility has no written policy on the cleaning of the ice machines. An interview and observation on 3/28/23 at 4:00 PM, with the Dietary Manager revealed that the ice machine in the kitchen had quit working about two weeks ago. She revealed a new ice machine had been purchased and received but not installed yet. She revealed that the only ice machine functioning in the facility was behind the nurse's desk. An observation on 03/29/23 at 8:50 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to honor food preferences for one (1) of fifteen residents reviewed for food preferences. Resident #6 Findings include: Review of the facility's, Resident Food Preferences policy with no revision date, revealed, Food likes and dislikes, 1. Upon the resident's admission, or within twenty-four hours after his/her admission, the Dietitian or nursing staff will identify a resident's food preferences. When possible, this will be done by direct interview with the resident. Review of the facility's, Resident Rights policy with no revision date, revealed, Residents are entitled to exercise their rights and privileges to the fullest extent possible. An interview on 03/27/23 at 03:15 PM, Resident #6 revealed I eat breakfast in my room since I have a colostomy and it's just easier in the morning to stay in here. I have told them that I don't want sausage and cereal; I do like grits and oatmeal that's easier to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$44,252 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $35,464 — penalty dated 2025-10-01
  • $4,394 — penalty dated 2025-03-04
  • $4,394 — penalty dated 2025-03-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.3+1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Gulfport Care CenterGulfport, MS 1 of 5Heritage Manor Of Baton Rouge IIBaton Rouge, LA 1 of 5Heritage Manor Of OpelousasOpelousas, LA 1 of 5Humphreys Co Nursing CenterBelzoni, MS 1 of 5Lawrence Co Nursing CenterMonticello, MS 1 of 5Lexington HouseAlexandria, LA 1 of 5Riverview Care CenterBossier City, LA 1 of 5Southern Hills Healthcare And RehabilitationShreveport, LA 1 of 5The SummitAlexandria, LA 1 of 5Tishomingo ManorIuka, MS 2 of 5Attala County Nursing CenterKosciusko, MS 2 of 5Heritage Manor WestShreveport, LA 2 of 5Highland HomeRidgeland, MS 2 of 5Landmark Nursing Center HammondHammond, LA 2 of 5Landmark Of DesotoHorn Lake, MS 2 of 5Matthews Memorial Health Care CenterAlexandria, LA 2 of 5Myrtles Nursing Center, LLCColumbia, MS 2 of 5Perry County Nursing CenterRichton, MS 2 of 5Sardis Community NhSardis, MS 3 of 5Clarksdale Nursing CenterClarksdale, MS 3 of 5Copiah Living CenterCrystal Springs, MS 3 of 5Heritage Manor Of Ville PlatteVille Platte, LA 3 of 5Heritage Manor of HoumaHouma, LA 3 of 5J G Alexander Nursing CenterUnion, MS 3 of 5Landmark Of RayneRayne, LA 3 of 5Landmark of Baton RougeBaton Rouge, LA 3 of 5Landmark of Lake CharlesLake Charles, LA 3 of 5Senior Village Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOpelousas, LA 3 of 5Washington Care CenterGreenville, MS 4 of 5Audubon Health and RehabThibodaux, LA 4 of 5Brandon CourtBrandon, MS 4 of 5Camellia EstatesMcComb, MS 4 of 5Forest Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterCovington, LA 4 of 5Heritage House Nursing CenterVicksburg, MS 4 of 5Heritage Manor Of SlidellSlidell, LA 4 of 5Heritage Manor Of Stratmore Nursing & Rehab CtrShreveport, LA 4 of 5Heritage Manor SouthShreveport, LA 4 of 5Hillcrest Nursing CenterMagee, MS 4 of 5Landmark Of AcadianaSaint Martinville, LA 4 of 5Landmark Of CollinsCollins, MS

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DELANEY, STEVENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR23%since 01/01/2016
CONDADO HEALTH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 01/01/2016
MEDIKEY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 01/01/2016
MILES HEALTHCARE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 01/01/2016
PACE, GARRYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 01/01/2016
BEEBE, HAROLDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016
SHELTON, REBECCAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2016
LONG TERM CARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016
TUNICA PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016
COTHERN, JOYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2023
WALLER, ROBERTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$784K
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 11%Other / private 89%

This home reported $784K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,659per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$329per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Mississippi
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,885/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,369/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 255334. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next