No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Tishomingo Manor

230 Khaki Street, Iuka, MS 38852 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 105 certified beds · (662) 423-9112 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse5 actual-harm citations$29,145 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Apr 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 5 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $29,145 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-30)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1310 Main St · (662) 471-9416 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1519 W Quitman St · (662) 423-3629 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
600 Battleground Dr · (662) 423-9595 · Call to confirm hours
Park
118 S Pearl St · (662) 423-3781 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1769 Cedar St · (662) 423-1767

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.4%20.5%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection7.7%2.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%1.6%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.4%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.0%19.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication42.8%23.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%97.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%6.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.1%20.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table31.2%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.1%2.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.5%84.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.1%27.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.852.431.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.552.861.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 199 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.1%CMS range 41.5–54.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.7–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge49.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.3–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.89
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
45.1%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 99.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-02)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect by providing adequate incontinent care supplies during the night shift for one (1) of four (4) residents sampled (Resident #4), resulting in actual psychosocial harm.Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy titled Resident's Rights Policy with a revision date of 12/23 revealed Every resident in this facility has the right to: 11.Receive adequate and appropriate health care, medical treatment and protective support services. 12. Be treated courteously, fairly, and with the fullest measure of dignity.Record review of the facility policy titled Dignity and Respect with a revision date of 07/22 revealed, A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life recognizing each resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-04-02 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident/staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from involuntary seclusion for one (1) of three (3) residents on transmission-based precautions (TBP). Resident #40 Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Incident Investigation & Reporting dated 11/09/2009, reviewed 1/14/2025, revealed, .Each resident residing in this facility has the right to be free from any type of abuse .includes but is not limited to free from .involuntary seclusion .Involuntary Seclusion: Separation of a resident from other residents or from his/her room or confinement to his/her room . Review of facility policy titled, Policy for Control of Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO) Infection dated 6/14 reviewed 1/14/2025, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to place residents in contact .precautions if they are displaying symptoms of active multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infection. Conditions requiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident with a urinary catheter and for residents with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) that required oral care, nail care, bathing, and facial grooming for two (2) or twenty-one residents sampled. Resident #5 and Resident #85 Findings include: A review of the facility's Care Plan Process policy, dated 06/15 with a revision date of 08/17, revealed, Regulations require facilities to complete, at a minimum and at regular intervals, a comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity and needs, in relation to a number of specified areas (e.g., customary routine, vision, and continence). Resident #5 Record review of care plan revealed a care plan that resident required extensive staff assistance for activities of daily living. Interventions included oral care two times a day and as needed. Interventions also included to brush teeth each night after eating, and to swab gums with peri guard mouth rinse.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-05-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff, resident, and resident representative interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide personal hygiene as evidenced by long, jagged nails with brown substance underneath nails, unshaven facial hair, unbathed, and poor oral hygiene for three (3) of 21 sampled residents. Resident #5, #39, #85 Findings included: Record review of facility policy titled, A.M. Care, dated 10/17, revealed, Purpose: to prepare the resident for their day, to maintain oral health and bodily hygiene, to provide for physical comfort, to maintain the resident's desired physical appearance, to observe the resident's physical and emotional state. Record review of facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, dated 12/20, revealed, Policy: An Activities of Daily Living flow sheet (ADL) will be utilized by the facilities and documented on a daily basis by the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) to reflect actual care rendered the resident. Record review of facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-05-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to assure that there was sufficient qualified nursing staff available at all times to assist the residents in getting the care they needed for three (3) of 24 days of staffing reviewed. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Services-Staffing with the latest revision date of 11/17 revealed 1. Staffing-The facility will have sufficient nursing staff twenty-four hours every day to provide nursing and nursing related services to attain or help maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident as is determined in the comprehensive assessment and the resident care plan . An interview on 5/21/23 at 6:50 PM, with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #5, revealed she works the 3-11 shift and that they usually have two (2) aides per hall. She revealed it can be a struggle at times, but they (the aides) must use time management to get everything done. Record review revealed that the facility triggered low weekend…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data review, the facility failed to submit PBJ data accurately to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for one (1) of four (4) quarters reviewed. 1st Quarter, 2025 (October 1 through December 31, 2024) Findings Include: An interview with the Administrator on 4/02/25 at 10:02 AM revealed the facility did not have a policy for submitting Payroll-Based Journal. Record review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report revealed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for the 1st quarter, 2025 (October 1 through December 31, 2024). An interview with the Staff Development Nurse on 4/01/25 at 10:10 AM revealed the facility's staffing needs were based on the minimum hours PPD (per patient day) requirement and by determining the resident acuity for each hall. She revealed call-ins were the biggest concern for weekend staffing. She indicated if a staff member clocked in late for their shift, that would affect the PPD. The Staff Development Nurse indicated they had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one (1) of four (4) residents observed during medication administration. Resident #12. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity and Respect with a revision date of 7/2022 revealed, 5. Residents will be examined and treated in a manner that maintains bodily privacy. A closed door and/or drawn cubicle curtain should be utilized to maximize the privacy of each resident while rendering care. On 4/01/25 at 8:48 AM, an observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed, she administered Resident #12's, who was a female resident, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube medications without closing the resident's room door, blinds, or pulling the privacy curtain. The door of the resident's room remained open and anyone passing in the hallway could see that the resident's abdomen area was exposed. An interview with LPN #1 on 4/01/25 at 9:10 AM, confirmed she did not ensure the resident had privacy while administering medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for a resident on a fluid restriction for one (1) of 24 care plans reviewed. Resident # 25. Findings Included: Record review of the facility policy Care Plan Process , revised 12/2024, revealed The overall care plan should be oriented towards .2. Managing risk factors to the extent possible .Interventions are actions that should promote meeting the established goal. A record review of the Care Plan Report for Resident #25 revealed, under Focus, Potential fluid volume overload related to Kidney failure. Under Interventions/Tasks it revealed 2,000-milliliter (ml) fluid restriction, with 120 ml allocated for four (4) medication passes, totaling 480 ml, and 500 ml with meals, totaling 1,500 ml, with a created date of 1/27/25. A record review of the electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #25 revealed no documentation of the resident's fluid intake. On 4/1/25 at 1:00 PM, during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 confirmed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to accurately monitor and document fluid intake for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for hydration. Resident #25. Findings Include: A record review of the facility policy Physician Orders, revised 1/2025, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that all physician's orders will be implemented timely and carried out in a professional manner. A record review of the facility policy Fluid Restriction, revised 2/2022, revealed, Fluids will be restricted for residents as directed by physician orders . Nursing services will document intake and output. A record review of physician orders revealed that Resident #25 was placed on a 2,000-milliliter (ml) fluid restriction, with 120 ml allocated for four (4) medication passes, totaling 480 ml, and 500 ml with meals, totaling 1,500 ml. This order was initiated on 1/30/25. A record review of the electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #25 revealed no documentation of the resident's fluid intake. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one (1) of three (3) resident care observations. Resident #12. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a revision date of 3/2024 revealed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions are indicated for residents with any of the following: . Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices . An observation outside Resident #12's room door on 4/1/25 at 8:42 AM, revealed a sign that read, Enhanced Barrier Precautions. On 4/01/25 at 9:01 AM, an observation during medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed, she administered medications to Resident #12 via (by) Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube without using a gown for EBP. An interview on 4/01/25 at 9:11 AM, with LPN #1, confirmed she did not apply a gown to administer Resident #12's medications. She explained that the gowns were not hanging on the resident's door; therefore, she did not realize she was supposed to wear one. LPN #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to submit accurate data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for one (1) of four (4) quarters reviewed. First quarter 2024. Findings include: Record review of PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 1 2024 (October 1-December 31), revealed Excessively Low Weekend Staffing-Triggered. Triggered=Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. During an interview on 5/21/24 at 9:53 AM, the Administrator (ADM) revealed the PBJ data is based on the hours entered in the time clock and goes directly to the corporate office. She revealed the agency staff that we utilize is manually entered into the system along with nursing administrative staff who occasionally work on the weekends doing patient care. The Administrator confirmed the hours worked by the nursing administrative staff were not captured correctly on the PBJ and were done so in error. She revealed the shifts for the first quarter of 2024 were covered, however, the data was entered incorrectly and did not capture the direct care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate by less than 5% for four (4) of 25 medication administration opportunities. The medication error rate was 16%. Findings Include: Record review of the facility titled, Administration of Medications, dated 01/24, revealed, PURPOSE: To administer medications in accordance with best practice .ORAL MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURE . 7. If resident requires crushed medications Do not crush time release or enteric coated medications. Consult pharmacist for direction with questions . During a medication administration observation on 5/21/24 at 8:15 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on the C-Hall revealed the following: LPN #1 gathered medications for Resident #81 that included Coreg 12.5 mg (milligrams) (1) tablet, Potassium 20 meq (milliequivalents) CL (Chloride) ER (Extended Release) (1) tablet, Loratadine 10 mg (1) tablet and Citracel plus Vitamin D Maximum 250 units (1) tablet and placed the medications all in a bag and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide dignity to residents as evidenced by leaving urinary catheter bags uncovered for one (1) of nine (9) residents with a catheter, Resident #244. Facility failed to serve meals trays concurrently at a table of three (3) residents in the dining room for two (2) of four (4) meals observed for Resident #20, #39, and #295. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dignity and Respect, with the latest revision date of 7/22 revealed, A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life recognizing each resident's individuality. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Tray Service and Delivery, with the latest revision date of 5/18, revealed, #6. Meal tray delivery-dining room . j. Trays are served concurrently to all residents seated at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an incident of resident-on-resident abuse timely for one (1) of 21 residents sampled. Resident #65 Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Incident Investigation and Reporting, dated 10/22, revealed, Purpose: To provide guidance to the facility for investigation and reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property and/or other reportable incidents to (proper name of stage agency), Attorney General, local law enforcement, and others as required by state and federal requirements. To ensure reporting reasonable suspicion of crimes against a resident within prescribed timeframes .3 The administrator shall report to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement entities in which the facility is located, any allegation or reasonable suspicion of a crime against any resident. The administrator shall report not later than two (2) hours after forming the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter received the appropriate care and services to prevent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) to the extent possible for one (1) of nine (9) residents observed with an indwelling catheter. Resident #244 Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Urinary Catheter with a revision date of 10/21 revealed, . 24. Secure indwelling catheter with catheter strap or other securement device. b. Male i. Secure catheter tubing to upper thigh or lower abdomen. During an observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 05/21/23 at 6:05 PM, she confirmed that Resident #244 did not have a leg strap on to properly secure the catheter tubing and revealed it could cause a pull to his catheter and cause him problems, such as dislodgement or bladder spasms. An observation and interview on 05/21/23 at 6:20 PM, the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$29,145 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $16,720 — penalty dated 2025-12-30
  • $12,425 — penalty dated 2025-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Gulfport Care CenterGulfport, MS 1 of 5Heritage Manor Of Baton Rouge IIBaton Rouge, LA 1 of 5Heritage Manor Of OpelousasOpelousas, LA 1 of 5Humphreys Co Nursing CenterBelzoni, MS 1 of 5Lawrence Co Nursing CenterMonticello, MS 1 of 5Lexington HouseAlexandria, LA 1 of 5Riverview Care CenterBossier City, LA 1 of 5Southern Hills Healthcare And RehabilitationShreveport, LA 1 of 5The SummitAlexandria, LA 2 of 5Attala County Nursing CenterKosciusko, MS 2 of 5Heritage Manor WestShreveport, LA 2 of 5Highland HomeRidgeland, MS 2 of 5Landmark Nursing Center HammondHammond, LA 2 of 5Landmark Of DesotoHorn Lake, MS 2 of 5Matthews Memorial Health Care CenterAlexandria, LA 2 of 5Myrtles Nursing Center, LLCColumbia, MS 2 of 5Perry County Nursing CenterRichton, MS 2 of 5Sardis Community NhSardis, MS 2 of 5Tunica County Health & Rehab, LLCTunica, MS 3 of 5Clarksdale Nursing CenterClarksdale, MS 3 of 5Copiah Living CenterCrystal Springs, MS 3 of 5Heritage Manor Of Ville PlatteVille Platte, LA 3 of 5Heritage Manor of HoumaHouma, LA 3 of 5J G Alexander Nursing CenterUnion, MS 3 of 5Landmark Of RayneRayne, LA 3 of 5Landmark of Baton RougeBaton Rouge, LA 3 of 5Landmark of Lake CharlesLake Charles, LA 3 of 5Senior Village Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOpelousas, LA 3 of 5Washington Care CenterGreenville, MS 4 of 5Audubon Health and RehabThibodaux, LA 4 of 5Brandon CourtBrandon, MS 4 of 5Camellia EstatesMcComb, MS 4 of 5Forest Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterCovington, LA 4 of 5Heritage House Nursing CenterVicksburg, MS 4 of 5Heritage Manor Of SlidellSlidell, LA 4 of 5Heritage Manor Of Stratmore Nursing & Rehab CtrShreveport, LA 4 of 5Heritage Manor SouthShreveport, LA 4 of 5Hillcrest Nursing CenterMagee, MS 4 of 5Landmark Of AcadianaSaint Martinville, LA 4 of 5Landmark Of CollinsCollins, MS

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ELTON G BEEBE SR IRRV GRNDCHILDRENS TROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 01/01/2010
ELTON G. BEEBE SR IRRV CHILDRENS TROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL85%since 01/01/2010
PARKINSON, TONIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
PROVIDENCE CARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
PROVIDER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
REGIONAL SERVICES, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
TRISTAR REHAB INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
BEEBE, BOBBYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CAIN, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/23/2011
GLYNN, MARGARETIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/24/2013
STALLARD, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
STEVENS, TINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2014
ELTON G BEEBE FAMILY MORTAGE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FOUR GENERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LINDA MAYNOROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2011
NUTRITION SYSTEMS CONSULTING INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2008
PHARMACEUTICAL CONSULTING SERVICES OF AMERICA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2018
TISHOMINGO PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/04/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$747K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 19%Other / private 1%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $747K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$339per resident / day
operating cost
$10,320per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$349per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Mississippi
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,885/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,369/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 255218. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next