Heritage Manor of Houma

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.5 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to:1. Ensure staff wore hair restraints when preparing food in the facilities kitchen (S12Dietary Manager's Trainer, S13Dietary Aide, and S14Dietary Aide); 2. Ensure food stored in the facility's refrigerators were labeled as required (Refrigerator e, Freezer f);3. Ensure shelving in the facility's kitchen was kept in a sanitary manner;4. Ensure the facility's staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene (S15Dietary Aide and S12Dietary Manager's Trainer);5. Ensure chemicals were kept out of food service areas;6. Ensure utensils were stored in a sanitary manner when not in use; and,7. Ensure cartons of nutritional supplement was stored per a manufacturer's guideline and was not available for resident consumption (Medication Cart c, Medication cart d).The deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 days observed for food preparation and storage requirements. Findings: 1. Review of the facility’s Employee Work Practices policy and procedure, last revised in 05/2018, revealed, in part, food service employees were to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for a resident at risk for falls for 1 (Resident #8) of 1 (Resident #8) sampled residents investigated for accidents. Findings:Review of Resident #8's Care Plan, initiated on 05/19/2025, revealed, in part, Resident #8 was at risk for falls related to impaired mobility and impaired cognition. Further review revealed fall interventions included brake extenders with highlighted tape added to Resident #8's wheelchair. Observation on 07/28/2025 at 11:50AM revealed Resident #8's wheelchair did not have brake extenders with highlighted tape. Observation on 07/29/2025 at 2:15PM revealed Resident #8's wheelchair did not have brake extenders with highlighted tape. Observation on 07/30/2025 at 1:46PM revealed Resident #8's wheelchair did not have brake extenders with highlighted tape. Observation on 07/31/2025 at 12:14PM, with S10Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) present revealed Resident #8's wheelchair did not have brake extenders with highlighted tape. In an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was not touching the floor for 1 (Resident #67) of 1 (Resident #67) sampled residents investigated for urinary catheter care and Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). Findings: Review of Resident #67's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/13/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #67 had an indwelling catheter and was dependent for all care. Review of Resident #67's July 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 10/17/2024 for an indwelling Foley catheter. Observation on 07/28/2025 at 11:04AM revealed Resident #67 had an indwelling catheter in place. Further observation revealed Resident #67's indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was hanging off the side of the bed touching the floor. Observation on 07/29/2025 at 12:00PM revealed Resident #67's indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was hanging off the side of the bed touching the floor. In an interview on 07/29/2025 at 2:16PM S4Certified Nursing Assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to:1. Ensure the correct enteral feeding (a type of liquid nutritional supplement that is typically given through a tube directly inserted into the stomach) formula was infused as ordered for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 (Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for enteral feeding maintenance. Findings:Review of the facility's Tube (Enteral) Feedings policy and procedure, dated 06/1994, with a revision date of 12/2015, revealed, in part, all enteral feedings will be administered in accordance with verified medical necessity and physician's orders. Review of Resident #13's July 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 07/23/2025 for Resident #13 to receive Nutren 2.0 (a type of enteral feeding) at 50 milliliters (mL) per hour for twenty-four hours per day. Observation on 07/30/2025 at 10:45AM revealed Resident #13 had Isosource 1.5 (a type of enteral feeding) infusing at a rate of 50 mL per hour. Further observation revealed the above mentioned Isosource 1.5 had an infusion start date and time of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen tubing was maintained in a sanitary manner per facility policy for 1 (Resident #14) of 1 (Resident #14) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings:Review of the facility's Infection Control Oxygen Equipment Cleaning policy and procedure, dated 04/2006, with a revision date of 03/2018, revealed, in part, oxygen tubing and cannulas should be replaced every 7 days. Review of Resident #14's July 2025 Physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 06/27/2025 for Resident #14 to receive oxygen at 2 liters (L) by nasal cannula continuously. Observation on 07/28/2025 at 11:14AM revealed Resident #14's oxygen tubing had a date of 07/06 written on the tubing. Observation on 07/29/2025 at 2:30PM revealed Resident #14's oxygen tubing had a date of 07/06 written on the tubing. In an interview on 07/30/2025 at 11:01AM, S11Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated Resident #14's oxygen tubing should have been changed out weekly. In an interview on 07/31/2025 at 2:00PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was accurately documented for 5 (Resident #8, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #53, Resident #110) of 46 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #16, Resident #18, Resident #19, Resident #23, Resident #26, Resident #32, Resident #39, Resident #42, Resident #53, Resident #55, Resident #56, Resident #60, Resident #62, Resident #63, Resident #67, Resident #68, Resident #69, Resident #74, Resident #80, Resident #81, Resident #85, Resident #87, Resident #89, Resident #93, Resident #95, Resident #108, Resident #110, Resident #114, Resident #115, Resident #118, Resident #119, Resident #120, and Resident #121) sampled residents reviewed for accurate medical record documentation. Findings:Resident #8 Review of Resident #8’s Care Plan, initiated on 07/15/2025, revealed, in part, Resident #8 should have brake extenders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to:1. Post the appropriate signage for contact isolation on a resident's door (Resident #4, Resident #5);2. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) wore proper personal protective equipment (PPE) while performing incontinence care on a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (Resident #67); and,3. Ensure CNAs completed hand hygiene during incontinence care (Resident #67).This deficient practice was identified for 3 (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #67) of 3 (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #67) sampled residents investigated for infection control surveillance. Findings:1. Review of the facility’s Procedure for Isolation: Isolation Precautions policy and procedure, dated 04/2006 and revised on 04/2014, revealed, in part, appropriate signage (isolation precaution signage) should be posted outside the resident’s door. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4’s July 2025 physician’s orders revealed, in part, an order for strict contact isolation precautions for Resident #4. Review of Resident #4’s Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assisted for oral care as needed for 1 (Resident #7) of 1 (Resident #7) sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings: Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 06/06/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (score of 13-15 indicated the resident was cognitively intact). Further review revealed Resident #7 required setup or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene. Review of Resident #7's care plan with a goal date of 09/15/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #7 needed assistance with oral hygiene with an intervention to assist Resident #7 as needed with oral hygiene. Observation on 07/15/2024 at 10:29 a.m. revealed Resident # 7 had an unknown thick white and gray substance on her teeth. Observation on 07/16/2024 at 2:20 p.m. revealed Resident #7 had an unknown thick white and gray substance on her front teeth. Observation on 07/17/2024 at 1:35 p.m. revealed Resident #7 had an unknown thick white and gray substance on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the facility's ice machine in a sanitary manner for 1 (Ice Machine f) of 4 (Ice Machine c, Ice Machine d, Ice Machine e, and Ice Machine f) ice machines observed during kitchen observations. Findings: Observation on 07/16/2024 at 12:45 p.m. of Ice Machine f revealed the grate at the bottom of the ice machine had an unknown white and gray substance, and a thin shiny film under the grate. Further observation revealed the outlet, where the ice/water exited the machine, had a brown unknown substance in the outlet. In an interview on 07/16/2024 at 1:05 p.m., S9Dietary Manager indicated she was not aware of who was responsible for the cleaning of Ice Machine f. S9Dietary Manager further indicated Ice Machine f was not clean or sanitary, and was being used by residents and staff. In an interview on 07/16/2024 at 1:25 p.m., S8Maintenance indicated ice machines should be cleaned once a month; however, he had failed to clean the outlet or bottom grate of Ice Machine f for over a month and a half. S8Maintenance further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff cleaned the shower chairs between resident use with an approved disinfectant for 2 (Shower Room a and Shower Room b) of 2 (Shower Room a and Shower Room b) shower rooms observed for infection control practices. Findings: Review of the facility's Whirlpool and Tub Cleaning procedure dated 08/2021 revealed, in part, the shower chair should be sprayed with an approved disinfectant. Further review revealed the approved disinfectant should sit on the surface for 3 minutes, and the surface should be wiped with a clean damp cloth. Further review revealed the shower chair should be cleaned and disinfected between each use. In an interview on 07/15/2024 at 10:02 a.m., S4Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), assigned to Shower Room b, indicated Virex was the approved disinfectant to be used to clean the shower chair between resident use. S4CNA presented the surveyor with a bottle of cleaner which was labeled as heavy duty floor cleaner which was identified as the cleaner that staff used to clean shower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

22 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA