No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rivergate Terrace

14141 Pennsylvania, Riverview, MI 48193 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 288 certified beds · (734) 284-8000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (734) 284-8000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 20241 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
17740 Fort St · (734) 284-0700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
17013 Fort St Ste 100
Grocery
Meijer0.3 mi
17124 Fort St · (734) 284-7928 · Call to confirm hours
Park
14700 Reaume Parkway · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
17125 Fordline St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.1%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.8%3.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.3%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.2%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.6%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.7%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.1%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.7%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.4%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.3%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.8%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.821.841.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.481.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 193 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
77.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 77.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.2%CMS range 30.7–45.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 7.6–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge77.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge69.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 5.9–11.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
34.5%
Total nursing turnover
48.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 288 beds and averages 228.3 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R244 On 3/12/2024 at approximately 9:30 a.m. an oxygen tank was observed on the floor of R44's room not stored in an oxygen carrier. On 3/14/2024 at 1:33 p.m. an oxygen tank was observed still on the floor of R44's room not stored in an oxygen carrier. R44 was lying in bed alert and was able to be interviewed. During an interview R44 stated, The oxygen tank been sitting in the corner ever since I went out on an appointment, I believe Saturday (March 9th, 2024). I used it to go out with them (staff). There is some (oxygen) left in there when I returned. On 3/14/2024 at 1:40 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CENA) X was interviewed and asked what the proper storing of oxygen tanks was. CENA X said oxygen tanks should not be on the floor, it should be in a wheel cart carrier. On 3/14/2024 at 1:43 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Y was interviewed and asked what the proper storing of oxygen tanks was. LPN Y said oxygen tanks are transferred by a nurse or CENA on a crate and it should not be on the actual floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure personal belongings were within reach for one (R169) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in feelings of discontentment within living environment. Findings include:On 3/24/2026 at 3:29 p.m. R169 was observed in the bedroom, sitting in a specialized wheelchair. R169 was alert, oriented to person, place, and situation and able to participate in an interview during the initial pool process. R169 expressed a concern that personal belongings were removed from the nightstand this morning by Unit Manager F. The belongings were placed in a box and placed in the closet. R169 stated, They said the State was in the building and had to be moved because it looked messy. It could have been straightened up but not moved. I don't understand. R169 was queried if able to reach belongings while in the closet. R169 said, My things were on the top shelf (closet) and definitely could not get to them there. On the floor, I may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (R246) of one resident's personal medical information, resulting in the potential for the disclosure of the resident's confidential health information. Findings include. On 3/26/26 at 10:00 A.M., while surveyor was in the Therapy Department, LPN D was observed working on the medication cart parked outside of 104's room. At 10:15 A.M. upon leaving the Therapy Department the computer screen on top of the medication cart was observed opened. The computer screen was left opened by LPN D. R246's written orders, medications and diagnoses were visible to anyone walking past the medication cart. The surveyor observed the following walking by; one respiratory Therapist, one wound care nurse and a housekeeper continued to bypass the medication cart. In addition, three residents escorted by guests being transported to therapy were observed passing the medication cart.At 10:25 A.M., LPN D hurriedly returned to the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to apply splinting devices and perform range of motion exercises as care planned for two (R1 and R2) of three residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM), resulting in the potential for increased joint contracture, loss of range of motion, and increased pain.Findings include:R1On 3/24/26 at 10:21 AM R1 was observed in bed wearing a gown with a right-hand splint on the bedside table. R1 was unable to answer questions when asked about care in the facility.On 3/26/26 at 9:38 AM R1 was observed in bed not wearing the right-hand splint.Review of R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the most recent admission to facility on 8/25/2025 with diagnosis that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented severe cognitive impairment and dependent for activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of R1's orders dated 9/5/2025 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to verify tube placement and assess for gastric residual prior to medication administration for one resident (R185) of two residents observed receiving medications via peg tube, resulting in the potential for aspiration, improper medication delivery, and respiratory compromise.Findings include:On 3/26/26 at 8:56 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A crush and administer Potassium chloride 15ml, oxybutynin chloride 5mg, Coreg 12.5mg, metoclopramide 10mg, sulfasalazine 500mg, apixaban 5mg, folic acid 1mg and losartan potassium 25mg via peg tube to R185.Prior to administering the medication, LPN A did not check for tube placement and did not assess gastric residual.On 3/26/26 at 8:57APM, (LPN) A was interviewed and queried about PEG tube protocol. LPN A acknowledged they did not check placement or residual prior to administering medications.On 3/26/26 at 2:05 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and said they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficient Practice Statement #1Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use the proper signage for two residents with highly contagious bacterial infections (R24 and R26) of seven residents evaluated for infection control.Deficient Practice Statement #2Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for one resident (R185) of two residents reviewed for enhanced-barrier precautions resulting in the potential for the transmission of infectious organisms.Findings include:Deficient Practice #1 R26 On 03/24/2026 at 1:40 PM, upon entering R26's room, an observation of an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign was on the door (infection control measures in nursing homes requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact care for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). R26 was observed in bed, wearing a hospital gown, and their eyes closed. Family Member N was observed sitting in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently assess and monitor a laceration (cut) for one resident (R903) out of three residents reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for an infection.Findings include:On 3/11/2026 at 10:15 AM, an observation revealed R903 had an intact laceration on the right side of the scalp with one staple noted to be protruding. R903 was interviewed but was unable to recall when or why the staple was placed.Record review of Progress Notes dated 2/11/26 at 1:46 AM, revealed R903 was transferred to the emergency department via emergency medical services following an unwitnessed fall resulting in a laceration to the right scalp. Further review of Progress Notes dated 2/11/26 at 8:45 AM, documented R903 returned to the facility after hospitalization.Record review of Physician/PA (Physician Assistant/NP (Nurse Practitioner) Notes dated 2/12/16 at 10:16 AM documented . Fall on 2/11, sent to ED (Emergency Department) given head trauma and laceration, staple intact, remove as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure upon admission and annually the Preadmission Screening (PAS)/ Annual Resident (ARR) Mental Illness/ Intellectual Disability/ Related Conditions Identification forms DCH-3877 and DCH-3878 documents were reviewed, revised, and sent to the local state agency for review and/or evaluation for mental illness and dementia needs in a timely manner for four residents (R22, R52, R175, and R190) of five reviewed for PASSARs, resulting in the potential for residents not to receive care and services appropriate to their mental health and dementia care needs. Findings include: R22- On 2/24/25 at 1:28 p.m. review of the clinical record documented R22 was initially admitted into the facility on 1/25/21 with diagnoses that included dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, major depressive disorder, epilepsy, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide wheelchair footrests for two residents (R86 and R93) of 18 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in the potential for injury to the lower extremities. Findings include: R93 On 2/24/25 at 9:30 A.M. during an observation and interview with Resident's family member Z (who was the resident's responsible party) complained the facility had given R93 a wheelchair without footrest. Family Member Z explained at home R93's primary caretaker and upon discharge no way could R93 be transported through the house without footrests on the wheelchair. On 2/25/at 2:30 P.M. R93 was observed being transported to therapy. R93's wheelchair did not have foot rests applied. R93's Family Member Z gestured while passing, pointing to R93's feet and stated, No footrests. Review of the clinical record for R93 revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly secure protected health information for one resident (R128) of 26 reviewed for privacy, resulting in the potential for unauthorized disclosure and access. Findings include: On 2/25/25 at 10:59 AM, a computer on a medication cart on the Blue unit was observed opened to R128's Electronic Medical Record, (EMR). Whle observing the computer screen for approximately five minutes there were several residents and other staff down the hallway with the open computer. The Unit Manager, (UM) K exited their office with the Assistant Director of Nursing, (ADON) C and stopped when they obsserved the surveyor looking at the resident's information on the computer screen. UM K walked over to the computer and closed the screen. UM K was queried about what was on the computer screen. UM K acknowledged R128's medical record was open and anyone walking by could see it. On 2/2/6/25 at 10:35 AM, the Director of Nursing, (DON) was interviewed and said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for three (R85, R91 and R206) of 36 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs and the lack of coordination of care. Findings include: R91 On 2/24/25 at 1:43 P.M. during and observation and interview R91 was observed in the room with his foley bag hanging from the garbage can positioned at the bedside. During the observation R91 commented he thought he was transferred to the facility for short-term rehabilitation and some services for the indwelling catheter. R91 indicated the indwelling catheter was new and staff had not educated him on the care required for the catheter. Review of the admission Face Sheet revealed R91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, Urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus, abnormality of gait, morbid obesity, benign prostatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions used to prevent the development or worsening of pressure injuries for two of five (R206 and R155) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 2/24/25 at 9:39 AM, 11:01 AM, 1:40 PM, 2:50 PM, and at 3:16 PM, R206 was observed lying on their back in bed on an alternating mattress with posey boots (soft foam booties to protect heels) in place. An elongated triangle- shaped positioning wedge was observed on the resident's right side of the bed, not in use for positioning. The resident was lying on their back without use of a positioning wedge during all five observations (5.5 hours). On 2/24/25 at approximately 3:17 PM Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Y came into the room and was queried about R206's repositioning schedule. CNA Y said the resident had been repositioned a couple of times throughout the day shift. CNA Y said, I checked on the residents every couple hours, throughout the day. CNA Y could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an oxygen cylinder was stored properly in a resident's room (R85) resulting in the potential for fire hazards. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the two residents (R85 and R145) that resided in that room facility. Findings include: On 2/25/25 at 9:59 AM three oxygen tanks were observed in R85's room. R85 was not present in the room and R145 was laying in bed. One of the oxygen tanks was observed to be leaning against the resident's dresser and not inside a metal carrier. R145 was asked about the oxygen tank and said, It's not for me. It's for my roommate. I don't pay no attention to it. At this time Respiratory Therapist (RT) N entered R85's room and was interviewed about oxygen tank storage. RT N said, We do not store oxygen tanks like this! These tanks are flammable and must be stored in a metal carrier. This is a safety and fire hazard. RT N left the room to acquire a metal carrier to safely transport the oxygen tank to the oxygen tank storage area. On 2/26/25 at approximately 9:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate and appropriate care for indwelling urinary catheters (foley) for one (R211) of three residents reviewed for catheter care resulting in R211's indwelling catheter not being changed or securely anchored as prescribed and a urology consult not being scheduled in accordance with physician's orders. Findings include: During an observation on 2/24/25 at 10:48 AM, R211 was lying in bed on their left side. The resident was wearing a brief with the foley catheter's tubing pulled out through the top of the brief and over their right leg. There was no anchoring device in place to secure the catheter. R211 said they have had several urinary tract infections that are not resolving. R211 was upset and said, I called my family. They are coming up here and taking me to see my doctor. They give me pills here that aren't helping me and make my stomach sick. On 2/24/25 at 12:49 PM, Nurse Practitioner (NP) H and Registered Nurse E were at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer oxygen as prescribed to one (R206) of six residents reviewed for oxygen therapy resulting in R206 sustaining a low pulse oximetry reading of 82% (device that measures the amount of oxygen in the blood, normal range is 90-100%). Findings include: On 2/24/25 at 9:39 AM, 11:01 AM, 1:40 PM, 2:50 PM, and 3:16 PM, R206 was observed lying in bed without oxygen in place via a nasal cannula (flexible tube that delivers oxygen through the nose) in place. The undated oxygen tubing and nasal cannula was observed on the floor underneath the resident's bed on all five observations (5.5 hours). The oxygen concentrator was at the resident's bedside, turned on, and set at 3 liters per minute with an undated empty humidification bottle. R206 was unable to be interviewed due to severe cognition impairment and non-verbal status. R206 was resting comfortably with normal respirations and did not appear to be in any distress on all five observations.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation includes two DPS. Deficient Practice Statement #1: Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for one resident (R206) of one resident reviewed for enhanced-barrier precautions resulting in the potential for the transmission of infectious organisms. Findings include: On 2/25/25 at 1:20 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) L was observed to enter R206's room with License Practical Nurse (LPN) J. Observations were made of staff gathering wet towels and performing hygiene on R206 without any PPE. CNA L exited the room with the soiled items. On 2/25/25 at 1:30 PM, LPN J was observed administering medications to R206 through their peg tube without the indicated PPE. LPN J was queried about the enhanced barrier sign posted on R206's door. LPN J said CNA L should have worn a gown when providing hygiene care. LPN J added they should have also worn a gown when administering medications through R206's peg tube. On 2/25/25 at 1:40 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00147768. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (R912) of three residents reviewed for elopement, resulting in a cognitively impaired resident walking through the front door and into the parking lot unsupervised with the potential for injury. Findings include; According to a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) on 10/20/24 at 1:34 PM, R912 walked out the front door of the facility behind a visitor. R912 was returned to the facility on 1:39 PM by another visitor that was entering the facility without injury. The Investigation report indicated that the receptionist was not adequately supervising the front door when they pressed the release button to open the front door for the visitor to leave and did not notice the resident (R912) following closely behind. On 10/29/24 at 8:15 AM upon entry into the main entrance of the facility, the first set of doors opened automatically into a foyer area where a receptionist was seated behind a desk. The second set of doors that led…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00146019. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate assistance during a mechanical lift (Hoyer) transfer for one resident (R601) out of three residents reviewed for injuries of unknow origin, resulting in a fracture of the right lower leg and hospitalization. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed, R601 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included dementia, Alzheimer's disease late onset, age-related osteoporosis (thinning of bone), and fracture of upper and lower end of right fibula (8/8/24). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R601 had cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15. In an observation and interview on 8/9/24 at 9:26 a.m., R601 laid in bed, had a soft cast on the right lower leg and wore heel boots. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A reported R601 does not get out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI144703 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (R701) or two residents reviewed for elopements, resulting in a cognitively impaired resident with risk for elopementr exiting the facility unsupervised and the potential for injury. Findings include: Review of the facility investigation and other pertinent documentation regarding a facility reported incident (FRI) that occurred on 5/15/24, revealed that it was reported R701 exited the facility to the outside through the main entrance following an activities aide at approximately 2:56 p.m. Resident #701 was brought back into the facility at approximately 2:58 p.m. by the Director of Rehab with no injury. Review of the clinical record documented R701 was admitted into the facility on 5/9/24 with diagnoses that included dementia, history of falling, anxiety, and psychotic disorder with hallucinations. According to the admission Minimum Data Set assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake MI00142807. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately provide infection control surveillance for all residents resulting in missed opportunities to decrease the potential risk of the spread of infections. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's Infection Control Book revealed no completed documentation of infection surveillance for January 2024 and February 2024. There was no evidence that data was compiled and monitored in a timely manner during those months to provide an overview of the facility's infection control practices. During an interview on 3/14/22 at 12:22 PM with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), it was reported that the facility did not have anyone consistently monitoring infection control program in January of 2024 until the end of February 2024. It was reported that the facility could not provide documentation or evidence that a complete line listing (names of residents with probable or diagnosed infections); or mapping (a color-coded map of facility to show possible clusters of infections of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure that the facility is free of pests, resulting in an increased potential for contamination of food, both food and non-food contact surfaces, and foodborne illness potentially affecting staff, visitors and all 219 residents. Findings include: On 3/13/24 at 10:42 AM, thirty live ants were observed in the kitchen's dry storage room. Upon observation the surveyor inquired with Dietary Director, staff A, on the current state of the insects in this area to which they responded, I'll have someone clean this up. At this time the surveyor observed staff A asking Dietary Aide, staff D, to clean the area. On 3/13/24 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor requested the facility's pest control policy to review to which staff A responded, I am not the best one to talk to about that, but maintenance has a book. On 3/13/24 at 10:49 AM, the surveyor inquired with Maintenance Director, staff C on if they were aware of the pest conditions in the dry storage room to which they stated, No. We…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Consistently complete neuro checks following unwitnessed falls for one resident (#77); 2. Ensure medications were ordered in a timely manner for two residents (#209, #379); and 3. Ensure skin assessments were consistently completed for one resident (#71). These deficient practices resulted in residents feeling anxious, delay in identification and treatment of a skin care concern, and the potential for delay in addressing other resident care needs. Findings include: Resident #77 - Review of the admission Record for Resident #77 (R77) documented an admission date of 9/19/23 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, and major depressive disorder. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented intact cognition. A review of R77s care plans documented in part the following: Focus: Resident is at risk for falls due to muscle weakness and multiple medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for the facilities census of 219 residents to include (R222) and it's staff resulting in an increased potential for harm. Findings include: On 3/12/24 between 1:22 PM, and 1:58 PM, during an environmental tour of the facility the following observations were made: Personal items such as a jacket, an opened beverage, an opened can of shaving cream, and a bottle of window cleaner were observed stored inside and on top of a fully loaded clean linen cart. An accumulation of dust and debris was observed on top of and behind the washing machines in the laundry room, and on the blades and the protective grill of the wall mounted fan in the soiled linen room. Lift batteries and charging stations were observed being stored in all five soiled utility rooms. Soiled conditions were observed in the blue and green hall's nourishment room's refrigerator and freezer. On 3/12/24, at 1:41 PM, upon interview with Laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow unlimited visitation for one resident (R382) out of thirty-eight residents reviewed for resident's rights. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 3/12/24 at 10:54 AM, R382's room was observed to be in a private room. Resident appeared thin, frail, and weak in appearance. Family Member (FM) M was at bedside. R382 was asked how the treatment was at the facility, R382 said, I guess its ok. FM M then reported that there had been an issue with visitation. FMM further reported that R382 was admitted to the facility and was receiving hospice services. R382 wanted family to stay at night, but the facility told family members they must leave after 11:00 PM, they even called the police. Resident was asked, do you want family to stay with you at nighttime, R382 said, Yes. Record review of R382's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission into the facility on 3/1/24 with a pertinent diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (cancer) of prostate. According to the Health Status Note dated 3/1/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were in place timely for two (R47 and R149) of 19 residents reviewed for Advance Directives, resulting in the potential for unmet medical needs in the event of an emergency. Findings include: R47 On 3/13 at 4:21 PM, documentation of Advance Directives for R47 was reviewed. The Advance Directive review revealed the form was incomplete. Review of the clinical record of R47 admitted [DATE] revealed an MDS (Minimum Data Set) indicating a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 4 which indicates severe impairment in cognitive function. On 3/14/24 at 8:45 AM, Social Worker E and Social Worker F were interviewed and provided 3 forms for review and explained the sequence of events: On 5/5/22 R47 Advance Directive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to resolve a grievance in a timely manner for one (R173) of one resident reviewed for grievances, resulting in unresolved resolutions of grievances and frustration. Findings Include: On 3/13/24 at 2:21 P.M., R173 reported every weekend the facility ran out of bariatric briefs. The resident stated every week end her assigned aide would inform her of the shortage and to obtain additional bariatric briefs the aide would have to get someone to go to the shed which was outside of the facility. R173 reported the concern to Social Worker (SW) E R173 stated nothing had changed since reporting the concern about the bariatric briefs. R173 reported not having any bariatric briefs the previous weekend and that the staff member (not sure of name) promised to obtain a package but never came back with the bariatric briefs. Review of the R173's Face Sheet documented R173 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00142660. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an unwitnessed fall which resulted in serious injury to the State Agency for one resident (#579) out of six residents reviewed for falls, resulting in the potential for future incidents of residents sustaining serious injury to go unreported. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency (SA) that a resident fell out of bed, sustained a head injury, and not long after passed away. On 3/12/24 at 9:07 AM, the family member/guardian for Resident #579 (R579) said R579 passed away on 2/22/24 from a brain bleed that resulted from a fall at the facility. A copy of R579's death certificate was provided. On 3/12/24 at 9:21 AM, a document titled, Certification of Vital Record and Certificate of Death, dated 1/30/24 was reviewed and revealed in part the following: -Decedent's Name: (R579) -date of death : 1/22/24 -Enter the chain of events - diseases, injuries, or complications - that directly caused the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a post dental care physician's order for one (#178) out of one resident reviewed for physician's orders, resulting in the resident verbalizing oral discomfort and the potential for the resident oral cavity to become infected. Findings include: On 3/14/2024 at 3:11 p.m. R178 was observed waiting in the hallway outside the conference room with a complaint of not getting proper dental follow up after dental treatment. On Monday (3/11/2024), R178 went out on a dentist appointment and had teeth pulled. R178 stated, I was supposed to be getting antibiotics or something afterward and I am not getting it. My mouth was sore after getting the teeth pulled and the Dentist order was to keep my mouth from infection. According to the electronic medical record, R178 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses Diabetes Mellitus-Type two, and heart disease. R178's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper foot care for one resident (R93) out of two residents reviewed for skin conditions who were dependent upon staff for performance of activities of daily living (ADL), resulting in unmet care needs regarding skin care. Findings include: On 3/12/24 at 11:02 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident #93 (R93) was observed asleep in bed. R93's feet were visible and appeared very dry and with peeling skin. On 3/13/24 at 8:30 AM, R93 was observed asleep in bed. R93's feet were visible and appeared to be dry and scaly. A review of R93's clinical record documented an admission date of 11/3/22 with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure, venous insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and obesity. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented moderate cognitive impairment and partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene. A physician order dated 9/20/23 documented to topically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer, educate and administer vaccines in a timely manner for two residents (R20 and R379) out of three residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Findings Include: R20 Review of R20's Immunization Report and electronic medical records (EMR) revealed resident had not been offered, administered, or educated on influenza or pneumococcal vaccination in a timely manner in 2023 and 2024 until 3/14/24. Review of progress notes dated 3/14/24 at 1:07 PM documented, Note Text: Wrier contacted RP (representative) (resident's daughter) r/t (related to) not receiving vaccine consent via mail. RP confirmed vaccine consents with writer. Record review of R20's electronic medical record revealed admission into the facility on 3/22/19 with pertinent diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R20 had intact cognition and required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). R379 Review of R379's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer, educate and administer a COVID-19 vaccine in a timely manner for one resident (R379) out of three residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccines. Findings Include: Review of R379's Immunization Report and electronic medical records (EMR) revealed resident had not been offered, administered, or educated on Covid-19 vaccinations in a timely manner in 2023 and 2024 until 3/14/24. Review of Progress Notes dated 3/14/24 at 12:57PM documented, Note Text: Writer went to residents' room this am to educate resident on vaccines and get consent, resident refused vaccines and education information. Resident refused to sign declinations and ask writer to leave the room. Record review of R379's electronic medical records (EMR) revealed resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a pertinent diagnosis of paraplegia (paralysis). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R379 had intact cognition and required assistance with Activities of Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00141958 and MI00142078. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse, for one resident (R902) out of three residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in an employee responding with inappropriate text messages to R902. Findings include: Record review revealed on 1/3/24 that facility reported there was a staff to resident sexual abuse incident. Record review of 902's electronic medical records (EMR) revealed admission into facility on 8/27/22 and had a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R902 had intact cognition and was required limited assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). During an interview on 1/17/24 with R902, it was reported that CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) C had texted the resident several times. Record review of text messages provided by the facility revealed messages were between CNA C and R902. Further review on snapshot #2 revealed CNA C full name…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00141409. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to apply splints (device to maintain position) to a contracture (tightenning of muscles and tendons), for one resident (R901) out of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLS), resulting in splints not being applied daily and the potential for worsening of resident contractures. Findings include: During an interview on 1/17/24 at 11:14 AM, R901 when queried about ADL care at facility, it was reported that they (facility) do not apply splints to left hand. R901 then reported that it was a fear that hand may get worse. It was then observed that R901's left hand- ring and pinky finger were contracted and was not able to move at will. Record review of R901's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admittance into the facility on 6/9/23 with a pertinent diagnosis of contracture of left hand added on 8/15/23. According to Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], R901 had intact cognition and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00136174 and MI00139020. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were delivered in a timely manner and in accordance with the scheduled mealtimes for the residents observed during dining observations, resulting in resident dissatisfaction and the potential for diminished nutrient intake. It was reported to the State Agency that residents' meals were not served in a timely manner. On 10/18/23 at 1:02 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) J said they had one meal cart delivered to the Orange Court and they are waiting on one more. On 10/18/23 at 1:12 PM, the second meal cart for Orange Court was delivered. CNA L stated, The trays just got here. We're waiting on coffee cups. CNA M stated, Where's the coffee at? They didn't bring it. (The kitchen staff) usually don't bring the coffee down until the second cart. But this time, the cups did not come with the second cart. Cups were delivered to Orange Court at 1:32 PM. CNA M stated, It's after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00136174 and MI00139020. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist in ADL care for two (R603 and R616) of six residents reviewed who were dependent upon staff for performance of activities of daily living (ADL), resulting in unmet care needs regarding skin care, showers, and resident dissatisfaction. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that residents were not being provided appropriate foot care and residents were not receiving requested showers. Resident #603 - On 10/18/23 at 12:04 PM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F and observation of Resident #603's (R603) feet was conducted. LPN F said that to her knowledge R603 does not have problems with her feet. LPN F described R603's feet as follows: -Left foot: skin was real dry. There was discoloration between her toes, peeling and flaky skin between the big toe and second toe. -Right foot: more dryness on the right foot. LPN F stated, She needs lotion on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00139265. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that wound care treatments for pressure ulcers (damage to skin and underlying tissue from prolonged pressure to skin) were consistently provided for two resident (R618 and R642) of three residents reviewed for wound care, resulting in the potential for worsening of pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident #618 Review of an admission Record revealed, R618 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer of the Sacral and Sacrococcygeal region. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 9/20/23 revealed R618 had severe cognitive impairment. R618 required total dependence of two staff with bed mobility. Review of a care plan revealed R618 had focus, At risk for break in skin integrity. Interventions included treatments as ordered. Review of Physician orders revealed, R618 had orders to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00139265. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the standards of infection control during wound care (hand hygiene and gloves), for one resident (R618) out of three residents reviewed for wound care, resulting in the potential for increased cross-contamination of diseases which place a vulnerable population at high risk for infections. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed, Resident #618 (R618) originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer of the Sacral and Sacrococcygeal region . Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 9/20/23 revealed R618 had severe cognitive impairment. R618 required total dependence of two with bed mobility. Review of Physician orders revealed, R618 had orders to treat the sacrum, coccyx, right gluteal fold, left gluteal fold, lower midline of back, right lower back, left heel,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Garden Terrace At Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Hammond-Whiting Care CenterWhiting, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of AndoverAndover, KS 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Cape GirardeauCape Girardeau, MO 1 of 5Life Care Center Of GrayGray, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of HixsonHixson, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Mount VernonMount Vernon, WA 1 of 5Life Care Center Of RenoReno, NV 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Sierra VistaSierra Vista, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center Of The WillowsValparaiso, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of TucsonTucson, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Life Care Center of ElkhornElkhorn, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of Hilton HeadHilton Head Island, SC 1 of 5Life Care Center of OmahaOmaha, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of PlainwellPlainwell, MI 1 of 5Life Care Ctr Of LawrencevilleLawrenceville, GA 1 of 5Rensselaer Care CenterRensselaer, IN 2 of 5Canon Lodge Care CenterCanon City, CO 2 of 5Darcy Hall Of Life CareWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Desert Cove Nursing CenterChandler, AZ 2 of 5Evergreen Nursing HomeAlamosa, CO 2 of 5Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of HoustonHouston, TX 2 of 5Hallmark ManorFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Lane House, TheCrawfordsville, IN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Altamonte SpringsAltamonte Springs, FL 2 of 5Life Care Center Of AthensAthens, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BridgetonBridgeton, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BrookfieldBrookfield, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ColumbiaColumbia, SC 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Federal WayFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of GrandviewGrandview, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of KirklandKirkland, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Merrimack ValleyBillerica, MA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Morgan CountyWartburg, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of PuyallupPuyallup, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Red BankChattanooga, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of South Las VegasLas Vegas, NV

Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DEVELOPERS INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/1993
HEATH, JANESAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/09/2012
JHAVERI, SUJATAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
CROSS, CINDYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/21/1994
HENRY, TERRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/16/1999
LAY, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/09/2018
SWANKER, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2011
THURMOND, JOANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/22/2000
LIFE CARE AFFILIATES IIOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2004
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/1988
RIVERVIEW MEDICAL INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2004
FLETCHER, TODDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024
GUPTA, BALDEVIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
LONG, ZOFIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/15/2004
PRESTON, AUBREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024
ZIEGLER, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024
PRESTON, FORRESTIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/08/1988

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.8M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 8%Other / private 18%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$320per resident / day
operating cost
$9,729per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$327per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235516. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next