Cassville Health Care Center
1300 County Farm Road, Cassville, MO 65625 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (417) 847-3386 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0602, F0610) — most recent Sep 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (82) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $123,925 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-10)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 31.0% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 80.8% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 4.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 36.2% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 42.6% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.7% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.1% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 63.5% | 79.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 37.7 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.79 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.84 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
82 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 68 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-09-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed Administrator was available to the facility, that staff were aware of who the Administrator was, and that the Administrator was aware of and involved in the day-to-day happenings of the facility. This resulted in the facility not having sufficient staffing scheduled and available on-hand to ensure proper care resulting in multiple residents being left wet for extended periods of time; in staff not having access to administer ordered insulin and pain medications; allowing an unlicensed driver to transport residents; and failing to provide protective oversight of residents after a staff member was allowed to return with an investigation of allegations of misappropriation against a staff member ongoing. The facility census was 44. The Administrator was notified on 09/08/25, at 2:18 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 09/08/25. The IJ was removed on 09/08/25 as confirmed by surveyor on-site verification. Review showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent any future potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while an investigation of misappropriation was in progress, when the facility allowed one staff member (RN A) to return to the facility to work as the only nurse on duty causing one resident (Resident #1) to be fearful of retaliation and taking steps to leave the facility due to the fear. The facility census was 44. The Administrator was notified on 09/08/25, at 2:18 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 09/08/25. The IJ was removed on 09/08/25 as confirmed by surveyor on-site verification. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy, revised 06/12/24, showed the following:-The facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for screening and training employees, protection of residents and for the prevention, identification. investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to all residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences, when the facility failed to ensure staff had access to administer as needed pain medication as requested for one resident (Resident #4) who showed physical and verbal signs of pain. The facility census was 44. Review of the facility policy titled Pain Management, revised on 06/26/24, showed the following information:-In order to help a resident attain or maintain his/her highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and prevent or manage pain, the facility staff will recognize when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when the pain can be anticipated, evaluate the resident's pain and the causes upon admission, during ongoing assessments, and when a significant change of condition or status occurs, and manage or prevent pain;-Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and allow residents to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, when the facility failed to maintain a nursing schedule to ensure sufficient staff were on-site to assist all residents resulting in nurses working over 24 shifts, lack of staff on-site to meet the needs all residents, and left the building unattended for a short period of time. This resulted in residents being left wet for an extended period of time and residents feeling concern regarding their well-being. The facility census was 44 residents.Review of the facility's policy titled Sufficient Staff Policy, revised 05/18/24, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
1.Please refer to event ID 1D693E-H3, exit date 02/02/26, for details.Complaints #2700845 and #2717249
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when the facility staff failed to keep food contact and non-food contact surfaces clean; when staff failed to ensure the refrigerators maintained proper temperatures for food storage; when staff failed to ensure stored food was properly stored/sealed; and when staff failed to ensure spoiled or contaminated foods were discarded. The facility census was 43.Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code (2022 edition) showed the following: -Nonfood contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris;-Pathogens can be transferred to food from utensils that have been stored on surfaces which have not been cleaned and sanitized. They may also be passed on by consumers or employees directly, or indirectly from used tableware or food containers;-Food that comes into contact directly or indirectly with surfaces that are not clean and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control system when flies were observed in multiple areas of the facility and multiple residents complained about the presence of flies in the facility. The facility census was 43.Review of the facility policy titled, Pest Control Program Policy, dated 05/14/24, showed the following:-It is the policy of the facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents;-Effective pest control program is defined as measures to eradicate and contain common household pests (including flies);-The facility will maintain a written agreement with a qualified outside pest service to provide comprehensive pest control services on a regular and scheduled basis;-The facility will utilize a variety of methods in controlling certain seasonal pests i.e. flies. These will involve indoor and outdoor methods that are deemed appropriate by the outside pest service and state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide showers per resident preference for five residents (Resident #4, #5, #7, #9, and #10) who required staff assistance with showering. The facility census was 43.Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Showers Policy, dated 06/26/24, showed the following:-It is the practice of the facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation, and help prevent skin issues as per current standards of practice;-Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols based on resident safety.1.Review of Resident #4's face sheet showed:-readmission date of 04/22/24;-Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (a cardiac dysrhythmia), stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 01/19/25, showed the following:-Cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident when staff did not address one resident's (Resident #7's) colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening, called a stoma, on the abdomen to allow stool and gas to exit the body when the colon cannot), open wound, or activities of daily living (ADL) needs on his/her care plan. The facility census was 43.Review of the facility policy titled, Baseline Care Plan Policy, dated 05/28/24, showed the following:-The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care;-The care plan will be developed within 48 hours of admission;-Interventions shall be initiated that address the resident's current needs including any health and safety concerns to prevent decline or injury, such as elopement, fall or pressure ulcer risk; any identified needs for supervision, behavioral interventions, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 68 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely and adequately assess and treat one resident (Resident #1) with a toe and skin injury, when staff did not complete skin assessments weekly, did not timely obtain a mobile X-ray of the resident's foot as ordered by the physician, and when staff administered antibiotics to the resident, despite a listed allergy to the antibiotic. The facility census was 43.Review of the facility policy titled, Clean Wound Dressing Change Policy, dated 05/18/24, showed it is the policy of the facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross contamination. Physician's orders will specify type of dressing and frequency of changes.Review of the facility policy titled, Skin Assessment, dated 06/26/24, showed the following:-It is policy to perform a full body skin assessment as part of the systematic approach to pressure injury prevention and management. A full body, or head to toe, skin assessment will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies that prevented abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents when the facility did not complete the required preemployment screenings including Criminal Background Checks (CBC), Employee Disqualification List (EDL - a list of individuals not able to work in long-term care facilities in the state) checks, and Nurse Aide (NA) Registry (checks for a federal indicator of abuse that makes an individual unable to work in long-term care) checks and when the facility failed to ensure the staff had valid nursing licenses for two staff (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F and LPN G) prior to the nurses working with the residents. The facility census was 44.Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy, revised 06/12/24, showed the following:-The facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for screening and training employees, protection of residents, and for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-10 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the current daily nurse staffing information in a clear and readable format and in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 44.Review of the facility's policy titled Nurse Staffing Posting Information Policy, revised 06/26/24, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time;-The Nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain facility name; the current date; facility's current census; the total number and the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift;-The facility will post the Nurse Staffing Sheet at the beginning of each shift;-The information posted will be presented in a clear and readable format and in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors;-A copy of the schedule will be available to all supervisors to ensure the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to fully implement their infection control program when staff failed to ensure the required two step tuberculosis (TB-a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough, and difficulty breathing) screening test was administered timely as per policy for two staff (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F and LPN G) of two staff sampled. The facility census was 44. Review of the facility's policy titled Tuberculosis Testing, revised 06/29/23, showed the following:-The purpose of the policy was to ensure each resident and employee of the facility is tested for tuberculosis (TB) after entering the facility to prevent the spread of infection;-Upon hire, a new employee will receive a two-step PPD skin test (a test used to determine exposure to TB);-Each employee will also have an annual one-step TB test to ensure that any possible infections can be triggered proactively to prevent further spread;-All TB tests will be kept on file in the according areas (employee files).1. Reviewed showed the facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a complete and fully functional call light system when the facility failed to provide staff with pagers for notification of call lights. This failure resulted in two residents (Resident #7 and #8) waiting for longer periods of time for staff to address incontinent care needs. The facility census was 42. Review of the facility policy titled, Call light Accessibility and Timely Response, revised [DATE], showed the following:-The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response;-All staff will be educated on the proper use of the resident call system, including how the system works and ensuring resident access to the call light;-Staff will report problems with a call light or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment when multiple resident rooms had pest droppings present on the floor, in cabinets, on window ledges, and on tabletops. The facility had a census of 39. Review of facility records showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding housekeeping. Review of a facility document titled, Housekeeping Deep Cleaning Checklist, not dated, showed the following cleaning instructions:-Strip beds and disinfect mattress on both sides;-Disinfect bed frames, rails, head/foot boards, doorknobs, light switches, outlet covers, paper towel dispensers, soap dispensers, call lights, glove brackets, bedside tables, nightstands, toilet, toilet seat, handrails, and bedside commodes;-Pull out and sweep underneath nightstands and dressers;-Clean windows, windowsills, blinds, sinks, faucets, mirrors, baseboards, and trash can;-Sweep and mop the floors;-Dust from top to bottom (areas not specifically identified);-Remove…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation when a facility staff member coerced money from one resident (Resident #1) and when the staff member dispensed and did not administer or destroy narcotic medications of one resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 44. Review of the facility policy, titled Abuse and Neglect revised 06/12/24, showed the following information:-Misappropriation of resident property includes identity theft, theft of money from bank accounts, theft of money from a resident, unauthorized or coerced purchases on a resident's resident card, unauthorized or coerced purchases from resident funds, a resident who provides a gift to staff in order to receive ongoing care, based on staff's persuasion, a resident who provides monetary assistance to staff after staff had made the resident believe the staff was in a financial crisis, misappropriation of resident property, and misappropriation of resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from unnecessary medications when staff administered medications to two residents (Resident #1 and #10) without following physician ordered monitoring. The facility census was 42.Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised on 06/26/24, showed the following:-Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. It is the policy of this facility to ensure the safe and effective administration of all medication by utilizing best practice guidelines;-Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside of physician's prescribed parameters;-Sign MAR (medication administration record) after administered. For those…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free of significant medication error, when staff failed to administer insulin as ordered for three residents (Resident #5, # 6, and #7). The facility census was 44. Review of the facility policy, titled Medication Administration, revised 06/06/24, showed the following information:-Ensure the six rights of medication administration are followed included right resident, right drug, right dosage, right route, right time, and right documentation;-Administer medication as ordered;-Injections are administered by licensed nurses as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice.1. Review of Resident # 5 face sheet (brief look at resident information) showed the following information:-re-admission date of 06/18/25;-Diagnoses included diabetes.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool filled out by facility staff), dated 06/18/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0773 — patternProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt physician notification of resident laboratory results when staff failed to notify the physician timely of urinalysis/culture and sensitivity results (a urine sample grown in a lab to identify bacteria or other pathogen, and then tested against various bacteria to determine how effective different antibiotics are at killing the bacteria) for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5) with untreated urinary tract infections (UTIs). The facility census was 39. Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, dated June 2023, showed the following:-Purpose to optimize antibiotic use in the nursing home and reduce unnecessary use of laboratory tests and antibiotics using a systematic approach;-The facility will track and monitor antibiotic prescribing practices and resistance patterns among its residents;-The facility antibiotic steward will ensure that the medical record of each resident included the dose, duration, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure food was prepared and served in a manner that conserved the palability and nutritional value of the food when staff failed to follow the Registered Dietician (RD) approved recipes and menu resulting in residents being served smaller than approved of protein portion and the food being under seasoned. The facility had a census of 39.Review of a facility policy titled, Dietary Meal Service Policy, revised 07/05/23, showed meals were to be served in accordance with prescribed diets and state/federal regulation. 1. Review of a facility dietary document titled, Week at a Glance Week 1, dated 01/10/26, showed the lunch meal for 01/29/26 was beef goulash, buttered carrots, chef's choice dessert, and a beverage. Review of the approved recipe for beef goulash showed the following instructions:-The recipe yielded 46 servings and 3 ounces (oz) of protein per serving;-The ingredients called for 3 pounds (lbs) 4 oz of dry elbow macaroni, 11 1/2 lbs of ground beef, 1 quart (qt) and 2 cups of fresh yellow onions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services in such a facility, when the Transport Driver transported four residents (Resident #1, #9, #11 and #12) in the facility's van to physician appointments when his/her driver's license was suspended. The facility census was 44.Review of the facility's policy titled Licensure Verification, revised 12/27/24, showed the following:-All personnel that require a license, or certification shall be verified through the appropriate issuing agency;-The Human Resources Director, or designee, is responsible for maintaining and ensuring the validity and current status of individual's certification/licensure;-An individual will not be employed and or/will be terminated from employment (whichever case may apply) if the individual has lost licensure/certification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program when staff failed to ensure the appropriate antibiotic was ordered for treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5) resulting in the residents receiving antibiotics that their infections were resistant to. The facility census was 39. Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, dated June 2023, showed the following:-Purpose to optimize antibiotic use in the nursing home and reduce unnecessary use of laboratory tests and antibiotics using a systematic approach;-The facility will track and monitor antibiotic prescribing practices and resistance patterns among its residents;-The facility antibiotic steward will ensure that the medical record of each resident included the dose, duration, and indication for every antibiotic prescription;-When a UTI is suspected the facility will document in the medical record the resident's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, refer to the Statement of Deficiencies dated 09/24/25. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective pest control system when the facility failed to take steps for pest control within the facility after multiple reported sightings of mice and mice droppings in multiple areas of the facility. The facility census was 42.Review of the facility policy titled, Pest Control Program Policy, revised 05/14/24, showed:-It is the purpose of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents;-Effective pest control program is defined as measures to eradicate and contain common household pests (e.g. bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitos, flies, mice, and rats);-Facility will maintain a written agreement with a qualified outside pest service to provide comprehensive pest control services on a regular and scheduled basis;-Facility will ensure that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) and law enforcement within the required twenty-four hour timeframe when staff noticed and reported missing medications to the Administrator for three residents (Resident #1, #2 and #4) out of twelve sampled residents. The facility census was 44. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy, revised 06/12/24, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed time frames;-The facility will report all alleged violations and all substantiated incidents to the state agency and to all other agencies as required, and take all necessary corrective actions depending on the results of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples refer to the Statement of Deficiencies, dated 09/24/25.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to monitor and accurately document regarding a bruise to the left lower extremity and failed to obtain ordered services in a timely manner for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 42.Review of the facility policy titled, Notifying Clinicians, revised on 05/18/24, showed:-The purpose of the policy is to ensure clinicians are properly notified of a residents change in condition and overall health and/or mental status;-The clinician shall be notified of changes of conditions, emergent situation, routine diagnostics, and concerns of the resident overall health status;-Examples included falls, incidents, skin tears, out of range vital signs, abnormal labs, altered mental status, new wounds, changes in wounds, medication refusal, and anything regarding a change in the resident's baseline or condition;-All resident health updates, changes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have pharmacy systems in place to ensure proper administration of medications when staff entered two orders for the same medication for one resident (Resident #4) which resulted in errors in administration. The facility census was 42.Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised on 6/26/24, showed:-Medications are administered by licensed nurses, other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. It is the policy of this facility to ensure the safe and effective administration of all medication by utilizing best practice guidelines;-Review MAR (Medication Administration Record) to identify medication to be administered;-Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after the scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by the physician;-Sign MAR after administered. For those…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services that ensured only appropriate licensed personnel administered medications when the facility allowed one certified nurse aide (CNA C) to administer medications to residents and perform blood sugar checks on residents. The facility's census was 45. Review of the facility's Administering Medications Policy, revised December 2012, showed the following information: -Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so; -The Director of Nursing Services will supervise and direct all nursing personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions. 1. During an interview on 06/17/25, at 9:17 A.M., Resident #1 said the following: -He/she observed CNA C and another CNA administer medications to residents; -One of the CNAs (CNA C) was a nursing student; -The resident did not know if a nurse prepared the medication for CNA C to administer or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each dependent resident received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff failed to answer one resident's (Resident #1) call light in a timely leaving the resident wet for an extended period. Four residents were sampled and the facility had a census of 50. Review of the facility's policy titled Call Light Response Policy, undated, showed the following: -The purpose was to ensure that all residents' needs are met in a timely, respectful, and safe manner by providing an effective and reliable call light system and by establishing clear procedures for prompt staff response; -The facility is committed to maintaining a culture of safety and responsiveness. The call light system enables residents to request assistance, and all staff are responsible for responding promptly to ensure resident well-being and satisfaction; -The policy applies to all direct care staff, nursing personnel, and other facility employees who may observe or hear a resident call light alarm; -Staff must respond to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility to provide care as per facility policy and the resident's care plan when staff failed to treat one resident's (Resident #3) rash in a timely manner. The facility's census was 45. Review of the facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status Policy, revised May 2017, showed the following: -The facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.); -The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on-call when there has been a need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly; -A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record showed the following: -admission date of 08/16/21; -Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect all residents' right to be treated with dignity and respect when when two staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A and CNA B) entered the on resident's (Resident #1) room with out the resident's knowledge, rearranged items, and removed personal belongings. Six residents were sampled in the facility with a census of 54. Review of the facility's policy titled Quality of Life - Dignity, revised 08/2009, showed the following: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality; -Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times; -Treated with dignity meant the resident would be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth; -Residents' private space and property shall be respected at all times. Staff will knock and request permission before entering residents' rooms; -Staff shall keep the resident informed and oriented to their environment. Procedures shall be explained before they are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure establish an accurate system of administration of medications when staff failed to accurately document administration of topical medications and administer them within the parameters of physicians' orders for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3). Five residents were sampled out of a facility census of 54. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, undated, showed the following: -Document the administration after it is confirmed that the resident has taken the medication in the resident's medical record and sign; -Any discrepancies in medication administration must be immediately brought to the Director of Nursing (DON). The physician and family must be notified. An incident report needs to be completed. 1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 05/29/24; -Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure food was protected from possible contamination per standards of practice when the facility failed to keep the ceiling in the kitchen and microwave free of debris and when the facility allowed dogs in the dining room during meals. The facility's census was 41. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled General Sanitation of Kitchen, undated, showed that food and nutrition services staff will maintain the sanitation of the kitchen through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule. Observations on 09/23/24, at 9:39 A.M., on 09/24/24, at 8:48 A.M., and 09/25/24, at 11:15 A.M., showed the following: -A three-foot by two-foot area of peeling paint on the ceiling above the food preparation table (the peeling paint could fall and contaminate food or food contact surfaces); -A four-foot by four-foot size piece of material that appeared to be used to repair an area of the ceiling. A three-foot line on the edge of the material is separating from the ceiling and causing a two-inch gap between the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed provide a fully functioning Resident Council Group when the facility staff failed to address and provide feedback regarding concerns expressed residents attending resident council meetings. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Council, dated April 2017, showed the following: -The facility supports residents' rights to organize and participate in the Resident Council; -The purpose of the Resident Council is to provide a forum for residents, families and resident representative to have input in the operation of the facility. discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement, consensus building and communication between residents and facility staff, and disseminating information and gathering feedback from interested residents; -A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolutions. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern; -The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, failed to provide the maintenance services need maintain the fire doors to the facility resulting in residents have difficulty moving aobut the the faiclity #3, #18, #8, #5, #27 Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, dated May 2017, showed the following: -The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized and homelike setting. These characterizes include clean, sanitary and orderly environment; -Staff shall provide person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences. 1. Observation throughout the the survey, 09/23/24 to 10/01/24, showed the following: -The smoke barrier doors closed and the magnetic hold-opend devices did not function appropriately; -One smoke door on the 200 hall was open due to the sticky or warped floor holding it open. The magnetic hold-opne device did not function appropriately. During the group interview on 09/24/24, at 11:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed fully implement their abuse policy to prevent the hiring of staff that may be unable to work in the facility when staff failed to completed a Nurse Aide (NA) Registry (a registry that indicated a list of individuals who had a previous incident involving abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property that would prevent the employee from working in a certified long-term care facility) check prior to starting employment and continued resident contact for three staff. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing Policy and Procedure subject of Abuse Prevention Program, dated 05/3/19, showed the following information: -Pre-employment screening will be completed on all employees to include a criminal history check, background check, reference check from previous employers, professional licensure, certification or registry check as applicable, misconduct registry, and Office of Inspector General. 1. Review of Dietary Aide (DA) F's personnel record showed the following information: -Hire/start date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all physician ordered medications were safe and fully effective when the staff had three expired medications in the facility's medications carts affect at least two residents (Resident #30 and #46). The facility census was 41. Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, undated, showed the following: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -The nurse staff shall be reasonable for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. 1. Observations on 09/26/24, at 9:45 A.M., of the nurse medication cart and the medication room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B showed the following: -One expired box of Naloxone nasal spray (a medication used to treat narcotic overdose in an emergency situation) 4 milligrams (mg) for Resident #30.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public, when staff failed to keep resident room floors a cleanable surface and failed to ensure the ceilings in good repair. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, dated May 2017, showed the following: -The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characterizes include clean, sanitary, and orderly environment; -Staff shall provide person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence, and personal needs and preferences. 1. Observation on 09/23/24, at 10:43 A.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed the floor had a buildup of a black, gummy substance on it. There were four chipped tiles with missing pieces causing the floor to not be a cleanable surface.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed the protect each resident's right to have and use personal possessions when the facility failed move the personal possessions of two residents (Resident #3 and #27) when the staff moved the residents to different rooms. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, dated May 2017, showed the following: -Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible; -Staff shall provide person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence, and personal needs and preferences; -The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include inviting colors and décor, personalized furniture and room arrangements, plants and flowers, where appropriate, and comfortable noise levels. Review of the facility's policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance to all dependent residents for bathing when staff failed to provide routine bathing for two residents (Resident #28 and #14) in a facility with a census of 41. Review of the facility's shower policy, revised 10/13/22, showed the following information: -The purposes of the procedure was to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident, and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. -The following information should be recorded on the resident's ADL record and/or in the resident's medical record: the date and time the shower was performed; the name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower; and if the resident refused the shower, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken. -Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the shower. 1. Review of Resident #28's face sheet (a brief summary of a resident's medical record) showed the following: -admission date of 08/18/21; -Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to to obtain a physician's order for treatment and administered a treatment without an order for reddened skin on one resident (Resident #1) and when the facility failed to obtain a urine sample for an ordered urinalysis for one resident (Resident #11) in a timely manner . The facility's censes was 41. 1. Review of the facility's policy/procedure titled, Medication Orders, revised November 2014, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure was to establish uniform guidelines in the receiving and recording of medications orders; -Orders must be written and maintained in chronological order; -When recording treatment orders, specify the treatment, frequency and duration. Review of Resident #28's face sheet (a brief summary of a resident's medical record) showed the following: -admission date of 08/18/21; -Diagnoses included diabetes, morbid obesity, and erythema intertrigo (A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate and collaborate, consistent with professional standards of practice, with the dialysis (a process of filtering and removing waste products from the bloodstream when the kidneys can no longer sufficiently do so) center, failed to monitor fluid intake as care planned, and failed to implement interventions to manage dialysis treatment such as consistent weights to monitor fluid retention and dietary restrictions to manage elevated laboratory results for one resident (Resident #28), out of a sample of two residents. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility's Care of a Resident with End-Stage Renal Disease Policy, revised September 2010, showed the following: -Residents with end stage renal disease (ESRD - a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. -Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents received behavioral health services to maintain their highest practical psychosocial well-being when the facility failed to care plan and implement resident specific interventions and failed to follow-up on psychological services for one resident (Resident #24), and failed to follow-up with possible on psychological services after the resident exhibited an increase in his/her mood score and expressed desire to speak with a psychologist for one resident (Resident #28). The facility had a census of 41. 1. Review of Resident #24's face sheet (a brief summary of the resident's history) showed the following: -admission date of 10/14/23; -Diagnoses included above the knee amputation of the left leg, diabetes, depression, psychosis (mental state where a person has difficulty distinguishing reality from what is not real), and anxiety. Review of the resident's September 2024 Physician Order Sheet (POS) showed the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure a medication error rate less that 5% percent when staff made two errors out of 25 opportunities (8% error rate) when staff failed to administered ordered medications to residents (Resident #11 and #2) during medication pass observation. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility policy/procedure titled, Medication Orders, revised November 2014, showed the following: -Medications should be reordered from the pharmacy in a timely manner to ensure no lapse of administration of medications; -For medications not received from pharmacy after reorder, nursing staff to follow up with pharmacy on availability and time frame to be delivered; -Staff may pull medication from STAT (emergency) safe, if available,notify the physician of any need in order change and notify the resident's representative if any new orders were obtained. 1. Review of Resident #11's face sheet (a brief summary of a resident's medical record) showed the following: -admission date of 07/02/22 with a readmission date of 01/11/24;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication error when staff failed to administer insulin per physician orders, failed to document notification of the partial insulin doses, and failed to develop and implement specific interventions related to diabetes for one resident (Resident #24). The facility also failed to administer multiple doses of two medications ordered to manage one resident's (Resident #28) chronic kidney disease. The facility census was 41. Review of the facility policy/procedure titled, Medication Orders, revised November 2014, showed the following: -A current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record of each resident. -Orders must be written and maintained in chronological order. -Medications should be reordered from the pharmacy in a timely manner to ensure no lapse of administration of medications. -If medications were not received from pharmacy after reorder, nursing staff were to follow up with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to maintain sufficient staff to provide an adequate showers/grooming, timely incontinent care and repositioning, and consistent and accurate wound tracking and treatments. The facility census was 50. 1. Record review of the Resident Census and Conditions form (form staff required to complete on annual survey) completed by the administrator, dated 11/30/22, showed the following information: -Census of 50 residents; -Forty-two residents required assistance of one totwo staff for bathing; -Five residents dependent on staff for bathing; -Thirty-seven residents required assistance of one to two staff for toileting; -Five residents dependent on staff for toileting assistance; -Forty-two residents required assistance of one to two staff for dressing; -Five residents dependent on staff for dressing assistance. 2. Interview and record review, showed the facility failed to maintain sufficient staff to provide bath/showers as preferred for four residents (Resident #6, Resident #8, Resident #28, and Resident #148).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a registered nurse (RN) work eight consecutive hours seven days per week. The facility census was 50. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to RN coverage. 1. Record review of the facility's time sheets for RN's for the month of 9/2022 showed the following: -On 9/5/22, the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of RN coverage; -On 9/11/22, the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of RN coverage; -On 9/12/22, the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of RN coverage; -On 9/26/22, the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of RN coverage. Record review of the facility's nurse schedule for the month of 11/2022 showed the following: -On 11/14/22, the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of RN coverage; -On 11/24/22, the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of RN coverage; -On 11/28/22, the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of RN coverage. During an interview on 12/7/22, at 11:20 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-07 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to employ a qualified dietary manager for food and nutrition services with accredited education in food service management. The facility census was 50. Record review of the facility's policy titled Food Services Manager, revised 12/2008, showed the following: -The daily functions of the Food Services Department are under the supervision of a qualified Food Services Manager; -The Food Services Manager is a qualified supervisor licensed by this state and is knowledgeable and trained in food procurement storage, handling, preparation, and delivery; -The Food Services Manager is responsible for the daily functions of the Food Services Department in accordance with the facility's department policies and procedures. Additional responsibilities of the Food Services Manager include: supervision, training, and scheduling of kitchen supervisors and assisting the dietitian and the nursing services department in selecting residents who may be fed by feeding assistants. 1. During an interview on 12/2/22, at 10:21 A.M., the Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards of practice and protect all food from possible contamination when the facility staff failed to ensure foods were held at an appropriate temperature to inhibit the growth of pathogens that can cause foodborne illness; staff failed to label and date open and left over food containers; staff improperly thawed potentially hazardous food; staff failed to discard dented cans when staff stored dented cans on the shelves along with cans of food staff used to prepare resident food; staff failed to discard expired food stored on the shelves along with food used to prepare resident food; staff failed to store food in a container that could not seal to prevent contamination; and staff failed to clean the floor in the dry storage room that stored food used to prepare resident food. The facility census was 50. 1. Record review of the facility's policy titled Food Preparation and Service, revised 7/2014, showed the following: -The danger zone for food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program for all residents when the facility failed to have a program in place for the prevention of the growth of Legionella bacteria (a bacteria which causes a respiratory disease when breathing in small droplets of water in the air that contain Legionella. It can become a health concern when it grows and spreads in human-made water systems) in the facility water supply or where moist conditions existed. The facility had a census of 50. Record review of the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Toolkit for Legionella (also titled Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings), dated 03/25/2021, showed healthcare facilities need to actively identify and manage hazardous conditions that support growth and spread of Legionella by: -Identifying building water systems for which Legionella control measures are needed; -Assess how much risk the hazardous conditions in those water systems pose; -Apply control measures to reduce the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention control program (IPCP) that included a functional antibiotic stewardship program with a effective system to monitor resident antibiotic use and potential trends of infections in the facility. The facility census was 50. Record review of the facility policy titled Surveillance for Infections, revised July 2016, showed: -The infection preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcome and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative intervention; -The purpose of the surveillance of infections is to identify both individual cases and trends of epidemiologically significant organisms and HAIs, to guide appropriate interventions, and to prevent future infections; -Infections that will be included in routine surveillance include those with: evidence of transmissibility in a healthcare environment; available processes and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-07 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention control program (IPCP) that included a qualified infection preventionist on at least a part-time basis. The facility census was 50. Record review of the facility policy titled, Surveillance for Infections, revised July 2016, showed: -The infection preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcome and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative intervention; -The purpose of the surveillance of infections is to identify both individual cases and trends of epidemiologically significant organisms and HAIs, to guide appropriate interventions, and to prevent future infections; -The charge nurse will notify the attending physician and the infection preventionist of suspected infections; -The infection preventionist and the attending physician will determine if laboratory tests are indicated, and whether special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to eliminate flies from the facility when multiple flies were present and buzzed around and landed on one resident (Resident #35) and when multiple flies were present in the kitchen and landed on various food prep items for resident use in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 50. 1. Record review of Resident #35's face sheet showed: -admission date of 6/7/22; -Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression, and dementia with psychotic disturbance. Observation on 11/27/22, at 11:35 A.M., showed the resident lying on a mattress on his/her floor. The resident wore a nightgown and an odor of urine permeated the resident's room. Five flies buzzed the resident landing on the resident's arms and top sheet. The resident said, I want to get up, come on, come on. Observation on 11/30/22, at 9:10 A.M., showed the resident lying on his/her back on a mattress on his/her floor. The resident's mouth was open and eyes were closed. Flies buzzed around the resident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient staff to provide bath/showers as preferred for four residents (Resident #6, Resident #8, Resident #28, and Resident #148) The facility census was 50 . Record review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, undated, showed the following: -Policy to provide resident care (i.e. dressing, grooming, hygiene, bathing, toileting) in accordance with the assessed needs and abilities of the resident with a goal of promoting and maintaining those abilities; -Purpose to meet the care and needs of the residents through identification and consideration of their varying abilities as their specific aging and disease progressing; -Staff should recognize that each resident requires individualized, creative care. 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included chronic atrial fibrillation (cardiac dysrhythmia), type 2 diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy (disease affecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument completed by facility staff) was completed for three resident (Resident #101, Resident #150 and Resident #248). The facility census was 50. 1. Record review of Resident #101's face sheet (admission data) showed an admission date of 10/3/22. Record review of the resident's MDS assessments showed the following: -Staff completed an entry assessment on 10/3/22; -Staff completed a five day assessment on 10/10/22; -Staff completed a discharge assessment on 10/12/22. Record review of the resident's progress note dated 10/12/22, at 10:41 A.M., showed a nurse documented the resident discharged to home with medications. The resident exited the facility at 9:30 A.M. accompanied by a family member by private vehicle. Record review of the resident's progress note dated 11/14/22, at 3:36 P.M., showed a nurse documented the resident arrived to the facility by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessments were completed within the required timeframe for six residents (Resident #2, Resident #6, Resident #19, Resident #22, Resident #33 and Resident #35). The facility census was 50. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 2, Assessments for the RAI, showed the following information: -The MDS completion date (item Z0500B) must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD-the specific end-point for the look-back period in the MDS assessment process). 1. Record review of Resident #2's MDS assessment showed staff completed a quarterly assessment on 7/21/22. During an interview on 12/2/22, at 11:47 A.M., the Social Service Director (SSD) said the resident's quarterly MDS was due 11/4/22 (28 days late). During an interview on 12/7/22, at 11:06 A.M., the Administrator said the resident's most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessments from the facility to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system within 14 days after completion for ten residents (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #9, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #17, Resident #20, Resident #21, Resident #23 and Resident #30). The facility had a census of 50 residents. Record review showed the facility did not have a policy regarding transmitting MDS data. 1. Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment, due 6/6/22 and completed on 7/8/22, showed staff encoded the MDS assessment data into the facility system, but did not electronically transmit the encoded MDS information to the QIES ASAP System within 14 days. Record review of the resident's record showed staff did not document if the assessment has been transmitted to CMS. 2. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for five residents (Resident #6, Resident #19, Resident #33, Resident #101 and Resident #150 ) that included measurable objectives to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment. The facility census was 50. Record review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, showed the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered plan for each resident; -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate activities of daily living (ADLs - dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and toileting) assistance to seven dependent residents when staff failed to provide timely incontinent care to one resident (Resident #19), failed to provide timely incontinent care and adequate assistance with dressing and grooming to one resident (Resident #22), failed to provide timely incontinent care and adequate oral care to one resident (Resident #35), and failed to provide an adequate number of showers to three residents (Resident #6, #14, and #37). The facility census was 50. Record review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, undated, showed: -Policy to provide resident care (i.e. dressing, grooming, hygiene, bathing, toileting) in accordance with the assessed needs and abilities of the resident with a goal of promoting and maintaining those abilities; -Purpose to meet the care and needs of the residents through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and routine assessments, treatment, care plan updates, and notification of the physician for one resident (Resident #99) with a change in condition of a sacrum/coccyx (large bone at base of the spine/tailbone) pressure ulcer (a local injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction); failed to provide timely repositioning, assessment, treatment, care planning, and notification of the physician for one resident (Resident #19) with a pressure ulcer to his/her left hip; and failed to provide timely assessment, monitoring, physician notification, and treatment for one resident (Resident # 14) with open areas to his/her posterior thigh. The facility census was 50. Record review of the facility policy, 'Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment', revised July 2017, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain signed informed consent and physician orders for side rails, failed to add side rails to the resident's care plans for three residents (Resident #29, Resident #37 and Resident #248), and failed to complete side rail assessments on a regular basis on two residents (Resident #29 and Resident #37). The facility census was 50. Record review of the facility's policy titled Bed Safety, revised 12/2007, showed the following: -The facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident; -The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment; -If side rails are used, there shall be an interdisciplinary assessment of the resident, consultation with the Attending Physician, and input from the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received proper nutrition at all meals when staff did not follow recipes/menus when preparing and serving food resulting in residents receiving portions smaller than called for by menu/recipe The facility's census was 50. Record review of the facility's policy titled Kitchen Weights and Measures, revised 04/2007, showed the following: -Food Services staff will be trained in proper use of cooking and serving measurements to maintain portion control; -Staff will be trained in the comparison of volume and weight measures; -Recipes will specify consistent use of metric or U.S. measurement guidelines; -Serving utensils used will be consistent with choice of metric or U.S. measure used; -Staff will be trained in the appropriate measurement and type of serving utensil to use for each food. Signs or posters explaining coded measurement indicators on utensils will be prominently displayed for reference; -The Food Service Supervisor will ensure cooks prepare the appropriate amount of food for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy for two residents (Resident #36 and Resident #248) by failing to replace a privacy curtain in their room. The facility census was 50. Record review of the facility's policy titled Quality of Life - Dignity, revised 8/2009, showed the following: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality; -Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth; -Staff shall promote, maintain, and protect the resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. 1. Record review of Resident #36's face sheet (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 7/22/22; -Diagnoses included alcohol abuse with withdrawal delirium (symptoms such as shaking, confusion, and hallucinations), metabolic encephalopathy (a problem with the brain caused by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) with a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) within 14 days after a significant change in status had occurred for one resident (Resident #99). The facility census was 50. 1. Record review of Resident #99's face sheet (admission data) showed the following: -Resident admitted on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage 3 (kidneys have mild to moderate damage and are less able to filter waste and fluid out of blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures). Record review of the resident's Braden Scale (assessment for predicting pressure ulcer risk completed by facility staff), dated 10/22/22, showed the resident scored an 12 (a score of 10 to 12 places the resident at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to routinely and accurately monitor and assess a wound for one resident (Resident #28) and failed to identify, notify the physician of, obtain treatment orders in a timely fashion, and monitor one resident's (Resident #99) wound. The facility census was 50. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy for notification to the physician of a change in condition. Record review of the facility's form Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) Communication Form, dated 2014, showed the following: -Before calling the physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant/other healthcare professional: evaluate the resident, check vital signs, review record, review an 'Interact' care path or acute change in condition file card if indicated, and have relevant information available when reporting; -Review and notify primary care clinician notified with date and time and recommendations of primary clinicians. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #150) who received dialysis (a treatment to clean blood when the kidneys are not able to. It helps the body remove waste and extra fluids in the blood) was properly monitored for potential complications related to dialysis, when staff did not did not have specific orders for frequency of monitoring of the resident's dialysis central venous catheter (an intravenous line into a vein in the resident's chest), did not document any monitoring, and did not have a person-centered care plan related to dialysis care needs. The facility census was 50. Record review of the facility policy titled Dialysis-General Guidelines and Management, dated 5/2017, showed the following: -It is the policy of this home that dialysis reidents will recieve dialysis service as per physician orders and will be monitored accordingly; -Avoid taking blood pressure and or wearing constrictive clothing of limb containing access; -Monitor for signs and symptoms of access site infection or occlusion or central line…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep food safe from potential contamination when the appliances and the exterior louvers on the range hood had a build-up of grease and lint. Staff stacked clean dishware inside one another prior to being air dried which all could potentially contaminate food prepared for residents. The facility census was 46. Record review of the facility's policy, titled Sanitation, Med-Pass, Inc., revised 2008, showed the following information: -The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner; -All equipment, food contact surfaces, and utensils shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soils by using the manual or mechanical means necessary and sanitized using hot water and/or chemical sanitizing solutions; -Food preparation equipment and utensils that are manually washed will be allowed to air dry; Record review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed physical facilities shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. 1. Observation on 9/29/2020, beginning at 10:00 A.M., showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-10-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control system for control of roaches and flies. The facility census was 46. Record review of the facility's policy, titled Pest Control, Med-Pass, Inc, revised May 2008, showed the following information: -The facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure the building is kept free of insects and rodents; -Pest control services will be provided by (left blank to insert a company here); -Garbage and trash are not permitted to accumulate and are removed from the facility daily, and; -Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. Record review of the facility's policy, titled Sanitation, Med-Pass, Inc, revised May 2008, showed all kitchens, kitchen areas, and dining areas shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish and protected from rodents, roaches, flies, and other insects. 1. Record review of pest control extermination visits showed the following information: -On 4/30/2020, the facility was inspected and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry for four staff (Dietary Aide (DA) I, Activity Director, Business Office Manager, and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) G) out of eight sampled staff to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given to a potential employee who has committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents) prohibiting them to work in a certified facility. The facility failed to conduct criminal background checks on two staff (CNA B and Activity Director) out of eight sampled staff to ensure the residents are protected from harm; and failed to check the Employee Disqualification List (EDL) (a listing maintained by Department of Health and Senior Services of individuals who are prohibited from employment in long-term facilities after an investigation establishes that they have abused, neglected or exploited clients under their care) quarterly for one staff (CNA H) out of eight sampled staff to ensure he/she was not on the EDL. The facility census was 46. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately begin an investigation of an allegation of abuse, per facility policy; and failed to ensure resident safety after an allegation of abuse when the facility continued to allow the alleged perpetrator (Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) B) to assist residents after an allegation of abuse, in a sample of 14 residents. The facility census was 46. Record review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedures, revised on 3/3/17, showed the following: -Purpose: to establish guidelines that identifies and report resident abuse -Policy: The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse. -To ensure each resident is treated with dignity and care, free from abuse and neglect and to take swift and immediate action to investigate and adjudicate alleged resident abuse. -Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including facility staff. -Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury to attain or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-02 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for side rails and failed to complete a bed rail safety check to include measurements of the bed frame and bed rails for risk of entrapment for four residents (Resident #2, #13, #34 and #45) out of a sample of 14 residents. The facility census was 46. Record review of the facility's policy entitled, Bed Safety (Revised December 2007), showed the following information: -The facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident; -The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, with input from the resident and family; -To try to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, mattress side rails, headboard, footboard, and bed accessories), the facility shall promote the following approaches: -Inspection by maintenance staff of all beds and related equipment as part of the regular bed safety program to identify risks and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices based on facility policy and acceptable standards of practice for 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic, when staff did not properly wear face coverings in resident common areas of the facility, and staff did not follow the facility's screening process policy upon entrance to the facility. The facility failed to ensure staff followed policies and acceptable standards of practice when staff did not appropriately administer, read, and document results for the two-step tuberculosis (TB; infectious lung disease) tests for three residents (Residents #39, #45, and #248) out of 12 sampled residents. Staff failed to pre-clean the rubber stoppers prior to insulin pen needle insertion for two residents (Resident #40 and #41). The facility census was 46. Record review of the facility's policy and procedure regarding Infection Control - Prevent and Control the Spread of SARS-COV-2, COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for the residents, including one resident (Resident #23). A sample of 14 residents was selected for review; the facility census was 46. 1. Record review of Resident #23's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 7/9/2020, showed the following information: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Cognition intact; -Independent for all activities of daily living; -Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; breathing disorder), sleep apnea (breathing disorder), anxiety, depression, insomnia, and high blood pressure. Record review of the resident's care plan, last revised 6/12/2020, showed the following information: -Resident had COPD and had difficulty breathing at times; -Used a Continuous Positive Air Pressure (CPAP) machine at night; -Monitor for signs of respiratory distress,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two-hour timeframe when one resident (Resident #3) out of a selected sample of 14 residents reported sexual abuse during care. The facility's census was 46. Record review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedures, last revised on 3/3/17, showed the following: -Purpose: to establish guidelines that identifies and report resident abuse -Policy: The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse. -Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including facility staff. -Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury to attain or maintain physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. -Sexual abuse includes but not limited to, sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault. Sexual abuse is the non-consensual contact of any type with a resident. -Staff are expected to report any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely assess, notify the physician of, and provide treatment for one resident (Resident #21) who had pressure ulcers on his/her heels, out of a selected sample of 14 residents. The facility census was 46. Record review of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Clinical Practice Guidelines, Number 15, Treatment of Pressure Ulcers, showed the following information: -Assess the pressure ulcer initially for location, stage, size, tracts, exudate (any fluid that has been forced out of the tissues or its capillaries because of the inflammation or injury), necrotic tissue (death of tissue in response to disease or injury), and presence or absence of granulation tissue (formation of new tissue, usually pink to red in color) and epithelialization (healing by the growth of epithelium over a denuded surface); -To monitor progress or deterioration, the examiner must accurately measure the length, width, and depth of the ulcer; -Reassess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-12-07 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure two staff (Registered Nurse (RN) N and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F were granted a qualifying exemption prior to starting their employment. The facility failed to fully implement their Staff Vaccination Policy for COVID-19 by failing to implement additional precautions, intended to mitigate the transmission and spread of COVID-19, for all staff who are not fully vaccinated for COVID-19. Unvaccinated staff failed to properly wear N95 (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) face masks and perform Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing for unvaccinated staff per facility policy. The facility census was 50. 1. Record review of the facility's undated policy titled COVID-19 Vaccination Policy, showed the following: -In accordance with the facility's duty to provide and maintain a workplace that is free of known hazards, we are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$123,925 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $123,925 — penalty dated 2025-09-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-24 for 122 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| RELIANT CARE GROUP LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2025 |
| RCG INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2025 |
| RICHARD J. DESTEFANE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2025 |
| DESTEFANE, RICHARD | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2025 |
| RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| ARSHAD, ABDULLAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| BRIM, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| 1300 COUNTY FARM ROAD, L.L.C. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $458K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265460. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.