No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Carrie Elligson Gietner Health Care Center

5000 South Broadway, Saint Louis, MO 63111 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (314) 752-0000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 752-0000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)6 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$92,561 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 6 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $92,561 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-01)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3900 S Grand Blvd · (314) 771-5800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3300 Meramec St · (314) 353-3300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4661 Virginia Ave · (314) 353-1111 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5570 S Broadway · (314) 289-5300 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.3%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms81.3%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.6%17.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.7%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.6%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.9%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table28.6%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine65.2%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission49.1%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.3%13.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.702.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.422.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.0%CMS range 5.3–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.8–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.20
RN hours/ resident / day
0.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 92.0 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.48 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.61 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-21)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for one resident, (Resident #1), when the facility failed to follow their weather advisory procedures regarding going outdoors in extreme heat. The failure put this resident, who was prescribed two medications that could affect the body's ability to regulate temperature, at an increased safety risk due to the extreme heat. The resident was outside of the facility, without supervision, from 9:00 A.M. until approximately 4:00 P.M., during a heat advisory. The resident reported to facility administration that after purchasing cigarettes, he/she became overheated and lost consciousness in someone's backyard for an unknown length of time. The resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] at 4:28 P.M. and transferred to another hospital on 7/25/25, with nasal abrasions, fractures, and heat exposure The sample was six. The census was 83.The Administrator was notified on 07/31/25 of the Past Non-Compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and address nutritional needs and swallowing difficulties for one resident who was at risk for impaired nutrition and hydration. The resident experienced a significant weight loss of 20.52 % in three months (Resident # 2). The sample size was 20. The census was 97.Review of the facility's Nutritional Management policy, last revised on 5/18/24, showed:-Purpose: The facility provides care and services to each resident to ensure the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status in the context of his or her overall condition;-Definitions: Acceptable parameter of nutritional status is inadequate, relative to his/her overall condition and prognosis, such as weight, food and fluid intake, and pertinent lab values; Nutritional status includes both nutritional and hydration status;-Policy:--A systematic approach is used to optimize each resident's nutritional status:---Identifying and assessing each resident's nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-05-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, monitor, and address behavioral health needs related to substance use disorder for residents with known history of substance abuse, including a thorough review of the referral information identifying recent substance use and positive toxicology results. The facility also failed to implement appropriate behavioral health interventions, monitoring, and services during a period in which social services staff were unavailable, resulting in missed opportunities to identify relapse risk, escalating warning signs, and ongoing substance use within the facility (Residents #104, #105, and #101). The resident sample was 20. The census was 97. The administrator was notified on [DATE], of the past non-compliance. The facility educated staff on incidents and accidents, screening resident's belongings, notifying physicians of resident changes in health, residents being in possession of illegal drugs, and the leave of absence policy. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the deficiency cited at Event KJ9713. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #10) kept all appointments with the orthopedic surgeon after an unwitnessed fall resulting in a fracture of his/her right arm on 9/13/24. Delay of treatment has caused pain and a decrease in his/her ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). The sample was three. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Resident Appointment policy, updated on 8/24, showed: -Purpose: To ensure all appointments and follow-up appointments (as needed) are scheduled. Residents will be taken to all scheduled appointments (barring emergency circumstances that require rescheduling). The facility is responsible in assisting with appointment management and scheduling/coordination of transportation (if requested/needed); -Procedure: -Nursing staff to assist with scheduling appointments and follow-up if needed; -Nursing staff to communicate transportation to social services director (SSD) and SSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    See the deficiency cited at KJ9713. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently assess pain or provide treatment in a timely manner for one resident (Resident #10) who fell and fractured his/her arm on 9/13/24. The resident missed a surgery date on on 10/23/24 after staff fed the resident, which resulted in the surgery being canceled. The facility failed to ensure the resident was seen by his/her orthopedic physician despite several attempts by the office to set up appointments since the postponed surgery or set up a new date for the surgery. The facility also failed to complete a new pain assessment after the resident's arm was fractured. These failures resulted in pain and a loss of mobility for the resident. The sample was three. The facility census was 77. Review of the facility's Pain Management policy revised on 6/26/24, showed: -Purpose: The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan and the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #10) kept all appointments with the orthopedic surgeon after an unwitnessed fall resulting in a fracture of his/her right arm on 9/13/24. Delay of treatment has caused pain and a decrease in his/her ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). The sample was three. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Resident Appointment policy, updated on 8/24, showed: -Purpose: To ensure all appointments and follow-up appointments (as needed) are scheduled. Residents will be taken to all scheduled appointments (barring emergency circumstances that require rescheduling). The facility is responsible in assisting with appointment management and scheduling/coordination of transportation (if requested/needed); -Procedure: -Nursing staff to assist with scheduling appointments and follow-up if needed; -Nursing staff to communicate transportation to social services director (SSD) and SSD will set up transportation for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently assess pain or provide treatment in a timely manner for one resident (Resident #10) who fell and fractured his/her arm on 9/13/24. The resident missed a surgery date on on 10/23/24 after staff fed the resident, which resulted in the surgery being canceled. The facility failed to ensure the resident was seen by his/her orthopedic physician despite several attempts by the office to set up appointments since the postponed surgery or set up a new date for the surgery. The facility also failed to complete a new pain assessment after the resident's arm was fractured. These failures resulted in pain and a loss of mobility for the resident. The sample was three. The facility census was 77. Review of the facility's Pain Management policy revised on 6/26/24, showed: -Purpose: The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan and the resident's goals and preferences; -Policy: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status to the extent possible, for one resident (Resident #34) who experienced a significant weight loss of 20 pounds from a weight on 5/14/24 of 136.6 pounds to 116.0 pounds on 6/26/24, resulting in a 15% weight loss in 6 weeks. During this timeframe, the facility's Registered Dietician (RD) completed a nutritional assessment and recommended health shakes three times a day. Staff failed to provide the supplements as ordered. The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's undated nutrition/unplanned weight loss policy, showed: -Assessment and recognition: -Nursing staff will monitor and document the weight and dietary intake of residents; -The staff and physician will define the individuals current nutritional status and identify individuals with weight loss and at risk for significant impaired nutrition; -The staff will report to the physician significant weight loss or gain or any abrupt or persistent change from baseline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food storage, dishwasher sanitizing, and cleaning was in accordance with professional standards of practice, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. In addition, there was no air gap between the ice machine and drain. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who were served food from the kitchen. The census was 97. Review of dietary cleaning duties list, received 5/21/26, showed:-Morning Crew: Label and tag open food, microwave (inside, outside, under), toaster (inside, out, under after breakfast), freezers (tops, inside shelves, outside), meat slicer (inside, out, under), wipe down all stainless, wipe all mixer surfaces, plate warmer (inside, outside), window sills (kitchen, dining room), clean tables, dry milk cooler, hand washing sink, steam table, spice rack, fill all table condiments, clean and roll all silverware, sweep dining room, mop kitchen and dining room;-Evening Crew: Label and tag open food, microwave (inside, outside, under), toaster…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms (Resident #2), resident common area meeting spaces, and resident belongings were kept in a clean, safe, and homelike manner. Concerns were noted with shower rooms on the 300, 500 and 100 hall, resident phone rooms, and with the sunrooms at the ends of resident halls. The sample size was 20. The census was 97.Review of the facility's Safe and Homelike Environment policy, revised 6/5/24, showed:-In accordance with the residence rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and home like environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk;-A homelike environment is one that D emphasizes the institutional character of the setting, to the extent possible, and allows the resident to use those personal belongings that support a home like environment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to send a copy of the transfer and discharge notices to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (resident advocate) for January, February, March, and April 2026. The census was 97. Review of the facility's Resident Transfer, Discharge, Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave policy, last revised 4/28/25, showed:-Purpose: Establish policy and procedure regarding the transfer/discharge of residents; To ensure no inappropriate discharges are made and that no discharges are made in an unsafe manor;-Notice of discharge or transfer: -Who must receive notice; -Notifying the representative for the Office of the State Long-Term Ombudsman; -A copy of the discharge transfer notice shall be sent to the Ombudsman at least 30 days in advance of the discharge or as soon as possible; -In the case of an emergency or immediate discharge, copies shall be sent to the Ombudsman; This notice shall be sent when practicable and a monthly list is acceptable and should include if the resident's return is expected. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate activities of daily living (ADL, daily care) care to meet the needs of residents by not assisting three residents with their showers (Resident # 35, Resident #25 and Resident #2) and provide foot care for one resident (Resident #25). The facility also failed to assist one resident during mealtimes (Resident #55). The sample size was 20. The census was 97. Review of the facility's ADL policy, dated 5/18/24, showed:-Purpose: The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable;-Cares and services will be provided for the following ADLs;-Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care;-Transfer and ambulation;-Toileting;-Eating to include meals and snacks; and systems;-Policy: The facility will provide a maintenance and restorative program to assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program that supports resident's interests and their choices of activities for three residents (Residents #7, Resident #25, and Resident #8). In addition, the facility failed to provide one to one (1:1) activities to one resident who was identified as having the potential to benefit from them (Residents #35). The sample size was 20. The census was 97. Review of the facility's Activities policy, last revised on 7/19/23, showed:Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all residents in the facility are provided an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with comprehensive assessment, their interests and their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being;-Procedure:--The Life Enhancement Director coordinates from the comprehensive assessment and ensures that activities are designed to promote and enhance emotional health, self-esteem, pleasure, comfort, education, creativity,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure smoking assessments were completed for three residents (Residents #91, #2, and #31) and failed to ensure lighters and cigarettes were not taken in two residents' rooms (Residents #91 and #2). The sample was 20. The census was 97. Review of the facility's Smoking Safety Regulations Policy, dated 6/29/23, showed: -The facility will provide direct supervision for smoking by patients classified as not responsible; -The policy did not address the frequency of smoking assessments; -The policy did not address the storage locations of smoking materials. 1. Review of Resident # 91's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/28/26, showed: -Diagnoses included cancer, chronic (long term) lung disease, seizures, and stroke; -Moderately impaired cognition; -admission date 10/31/25. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of the survey, showed: -The care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employee two-step tuberculin skin tests were completed in accordance with State guidelines for nine of 10 sampled employees. The census was 97. Review of the facility's tuberculosis (TB) testing policy, dated 6/29/23, showed:-Purpose: To ensure each resident and employee of the facility is tested for TB after entering the facility to prevent the spread of infection;-Procedure: Upon hire a new employee will receive a two step purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test. Each employee will also have an annual one step TB test to ensure that any possible infections can be triggered proactively to prevent further spread. 1. Review of Employee AA's personnel file, showed:-Hire date of 5/28/25;-No documentation of first step TB test being administered;-No documentation of second step TB test being administered. 2. Review of Employee BB's personnel file, showed:-Hire date of 5/4/26;-A first step TB test administered on 4/27/26 and read on 4/29/26 with a negative result;-No documentation of second step TB test being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was given to three of three sampled residents who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare Part A services (Residents #9, #21, and #75). The census was 97. Review of the facility's Advanced Beneficiary Notice policy, dated 11/5/24, showed:-Purpose: To ensure the facility provides timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage;-Policy: A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), Form CMS-10123, shall be issued to the resident/representative when Medicare covered service(s) are ending, no matter if resident is leaving the facility or remaining in the facility. This informs the resident on how to request an appeal or expedited determination from their quality improvement organization (QIO).-To ensure that the resident, or representative, has enough time to make a decision whether or not to receive the services in question and assume financial responsibility, the notice shall be provided at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for two residents (Resident #101 and #104) by failing to assess, monitor, and respond to signs and symptoms associated with substance use and overdose. The facility failed to ensure ongoing medical monitoring following an overdose that required Narcan (life-saving medication used to rapidly reverse opioid overdoses) administration (Resident #101). The facility failed to assess, evaluate, and implement interventions following observed behavioral changes and signs consistent with substance use or withdrawal, resulting in missed opportunities to identify and address ongoing substance related risks (Resident #104). The sample size was 20. The census was 97. Review of the facility's Residents- Possession and Use of Illegal Drugs, Marijuana and Alcohol and Drug Screen and Searches policy, revised 4/30/24, showed:-Purpose: To ensure that the Facility remains free from illegal drugs and substances as well as marijuana and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and biologicals were removed from medication carts and medication rooms in the facility. Concerns were noted with two of two medication rooms and one of four medication carts reviewed for the survey. The resident sample was 20. The census was 97.Review of the facility's Medication Storage Policy revised 5/18/24, showed:-All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls;-Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments;-The pharmacy and all medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated, defective, or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible, or missing labels. These medications are destroyed in accordance with the medication destruction policy. 1.Observation on 5/18/26 at 12:31 P.M. of the fifth-floor medication storage room showed a bottle of MedLine Drug Buster (a chemical agent that uses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The sample was five. The census was 86. Review of the facility's Sufficient Staffing Policy, dated February 2023, showed the following:-Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility's census, acuity and diagnoses of the resident population will be considered based on the facility assessment.-Policy: -The facility is required to provide licensed nursing staff 24 hours a day, 7 days a week;- Except when waived, the facility must use the services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. Review of the facility's daily staffing sheets showed the following:-8/20 through 8/22/25, no RN scheduled;-8/25 through 8/31/25, no RN scheduled;-9/1 through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure recipes were followed while preparing pureed meals for one of one observed mealtime preparation. The census was 86.Observation on 9/22/25 at 11:05 A.M. of the kitchen, showed [NAME] D took one breaded chicken breast, placed it in a blender and added approximately one tablespoon of water and blended for approximately 45 seconds. Observation after blending, the breaded chicken breast appeared to be of ground meat consistency and not smooth. [NAME] D portioned the mixture into tin pans and placed it on the steamtable. Review of the facility's Pureed Breaded Chicken Breast recipe, dated 2025, showed the following:-One Serving: One breaded chicken breast, four tablespoons and two teaspoons of water and one fourth teaspoon of chicken base;-Combine chicken base and water to make chicken broth. Place prepared breaded chicken breasts in a sanitized food processor. Add broth and blend until smooth. During an interview on 9/22/25 at 11:15 A.M., [NAME] D said he/she should have followed the recipe for the pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen walls clean and floors free of grease, dirt and grime for one of one day of observation. The census was 86.Review of the facility's Dietary Cleaning Duties, undated, showed the following:-Morning Crew: Wipe down all stainless surfaces, clean ovens and stove top, mop kitchen and dining room;-Evening Crew: Wipe down all stainless surfaces, clean ovens and stove top, mop kitchen and dining room;All employees must clock out with work completed at designated time. The cook on duty is responsible for checking that above duties are completed before they clock out. Manager is to assure this process is carried out. Observation on 9/22/25 of the kitchen, showed the following:-9:00 A.M., the floor under the refrigerator and along the back wall had dirt built up and grime;-9:02 A.M., the floor under the stove and fryer had built up grease and grime and the walls next to the fryer had built up grease and grime;-9:04 A.M., the floor under the coffee station had built up dirt and grime;-11:04 A.M., the walls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards when staff failed to make an appointment and follow up with a urologist (specializes in the urinary and reproductive systems) as requested by the urologist for one resident. (Resident #4). The sample was five. The census was 86. Review of the facility's Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders Policy, dated 5/18/24, showed the following:-Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to outline procedures in accurately transcribing physician's orders and to ensure that all physicians' orders are followed. To ensure a process is in place to monitor nurses in accurately transcribing and following physician's orders;-Procedure:-A. Upon receiving a physician's order via telephone, fax, written order, verbal order, transcribed order or other, it will be documented in residents' electronic medical records in orders section; -B. Clarification of Physician's Orders will be obtained if the order is either unclear or the nurse is uncomfortable in implementation of the Physician's Orders. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications on the 200 hallway, were stored properly for multiple residents, including two sampled (Residents #1 and #2), which had the potential to cause harm to all residents. The sample was five. The census was 87.Review of the facility's medication storage policy, dated 5/18/24, showed:-Policy: All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, under proper temperature control. Narcotics and controlled substance medications are stored under double lock and key;-Any discrepancies which cannot be resolved must be reported immediately as follows: Notify the Director of Nursing (DON), charge nurse, and the pharmacy. Complete an incident report detailing the discrepancy, steps taken to resolve it, and names of all licensed staff working when the discrepancy was noted. Staff may not leave the area until discrepancies are resolved or reported as unresolved discrepancies. 1. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a background screening for one hired employee (Administrator A). The facility failed to screen Administrator A to rule out the presence of a Federal Indicator, failed to conduct a Criminal Background Check (CBC), and Employee Disqualification List (EDL) check. The facility also failed to maintain records of the employment application, experience and education, references, license verification, and results of the background checks required by section 660.317 of Revised MO Statues. Administrator A was employed at the facility for approximately four months. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 86. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, revised 6/12/24, showed: -This Facility will not employ individuals who have been convicted of abusing, neglecting or mistreating individuals. Potential employees are screened for a history of abuse, neglect or mistreating of residents; -This Facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a qualified Administrator on duty. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 86. Review of the current Missouri Board of Nursing Home Administrators (MBNHA) license registry website, showed Administrator A not listed as a current Missouri Licensed Administrator. Review of Administrator A's Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) facility history, showed: -Administrator at Facility D on 10/14/24 through 11/5/24; -Administrator at Facility E on 11/7/24 through 3/19/25. During an interview on 4/2/25 at 10:30 A.M., Administrator B said he/she had been the Administrator of Facility E since 3/27/25. During an interview on 4/2/25 at 2:42 P.M., the Regional Director of Operations said he/she had been with the company since January 2025, so Administrator A was already employed at Facility E. Administrator A's license was checked along with new hires, but his/her name was not listed at all, not even inactive. Administrator A said he/she did not know why he/she was not on there and later…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the deficiency cited at Event KJ9713. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained documentation of medication as provided on the medication administration record and treatment administration for two months for three of three sampled residents (Residents #11, #12 and #10). The census was 77. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, revised on 6/26/24, showed: -Purpose: Medications are administered by licensed nurses or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. It is the policy of the facility to ensure the safe and effective administration of all medications by utilizing best practice guidelines; -General medication administration process: -Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: 1. Right resident; 2. Right drug; 3. Right dosage; 4. Right route; 5. Right time; 6.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the deficiency cited at Event KJ9713. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated and accurate to reflect resident needs. This failure affected one of three sampled residents, whose care plan did not identify the resident's increased need for staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) after falling and fracturing his/her arm (Resident #10). The sample was three. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Baseline Care Plan Policy revised on 5/18/24, showed: -The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care: -Policy: The baseline care plan will: -Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident, including but not limited to: -Physicians orders; -Therapy services; -Social services; -The admitting nurse or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See event ID #KJ9712. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control by ensuring resident rooms (Resident #4, #5, #3, #6, #7 and #8) were free from bed bugs (small, oval, brown insects that feed on the blood of animals and humans). This failure had the potential to affect all residents. The sample was nine. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Bed Bug Prevention and Management Policy, revised on 5/14/24, showed: -Purpose: Staff will implement measures to prevent, eradicate and contain bed bugs as a part of the facility's overall pest control program; -Policy: The facility shall take a systematic approach to bed bug prevention and management, including monitoring and detection, treatment of affected resident(s), eradication of pests and prevention of recurrence; -Monitoring and detection: -Bed bugs can be hard to find and identify given their small size and their habit of staying hidden; -Bed bugs usually travel on belongings, not people; -Bites on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained documentation of medication as provided on the medication administration record and treatment administration for two months for three of three sampled residents (Residents #11, #12 and #10). The census was 77. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, revised on 6/26/24, showed: -Purpose: Medications are administered by licensed nurses or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. It is the policy of the facility to ensure the safe and effective administration of all medications by utilizing best practice guidelines; -General medication administration process: -Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: 1. Right resident; 2. Right drug; 3. Right dosage; 4. Right route; 5. Right time; 6. Right documentation; -Sign medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control by ensuring resident rooms (Resident #4, #5, #3, #6, #7 and #8) were free from bed bugs (small, oval, brown insects that feed on the blood of animals and humans). This failure had the potential to affect all residents. The sample was nine. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Bed Bug Prevention and Management Policy, revised on 5/14/24, showed: -Purpose: Staff will implement measures to prevent, eradicate and contain bed bugs as a part of the facility's overall pest control program; -Policy: The facility shall take a systematic approach to bed bug prevention and management, including monitoring and detection, treatment of affected resident(s), eradication of pests and prevention of recurrence; -Monitoring and detection: -Bed bugs can be hard to find and identify given their small size and their habit of staying hidden; -Bed bugs usually travel on belongings, not people; -Bites on skin are a poor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required timeline after two residents reported a staff member verbally abused them (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Staff also failed to report the abuse to facility administration in a timely manner. The sample size was four. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy dated 7/25/24, showed: -Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed time frames; -Definitions: -Verbal abuse: Verbal abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they followed their abuse and neglect policy by failing to conduct a thorough investigation into one resident's (Resident #1) allegation a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) cursed and threatened him/her on 10/19/24. The resident reported the allegation on 10/19/24 and on 10/20/24 when he/she saw the CNA back at the facility. The facility initiated an investigation on 10/19/24, but failed to thoroughly interview all staff involved, interview other residents, document verbal statements and make appropriate notifications. The census was 80. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy dated 7/25/24, showed: -Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated and accurate to reflect resident needs. This failure affected one of three sampled residents, whose care plan did not identify the resident's increased need for staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) after falling and fracturing his/her arm (Resident #10). The sample was three. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Baseline Care Plan Policy revised on 5/18/24, showed: -The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care: -Policy: The baseline care plan will: -Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident, including but not limited to: -Physicians orders; -Therapy services; -Social services; -The admitting nurse or supervising nurse on duty, shall gather information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared separate from dish cleaning and failed to ensure floors and walls in the kitchen were clean and free from debris, fans in the dish washing room free from dust build up, ceiling lights above the food prep station free from dust accumulation, and that the dry food storage rack was free from debris. The census was 79. Review of the facility's dietary cleaning duties, undated, showed: -Morning crew: mop kitchen and dining room, wipe down all racks, fridges, and freezers; -Evening crew: mop kitchen; -Weekly: dietary supervisor to clean all equipment that may emit dust, lint, or grease residue in the kitchen, dining room, dishwasher room, and all dietary storage areas. 1. Observation of lunch preparation on 6/25/24, showed: -At 8:52 A.M., the Dietary Supervisor opened bags of raw chicken and placed chicken into the sink; -At 8:55 A.M., [NAME] H brought two pans over to the sink next to where the chicken was and started to clean the dishes; -At 8:56 A.M., water from the sink where dishes were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #7's) advanced directive matched in the hard (paper) chart and on the physician's orders sheet (POS) and that one resident (Resident #72) had a current physician's order for code status. The facility also failed to ensure the resident's advanced directives were reviewed annually (Residents #62, #25, #2, #19, #26, #41). The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's advanced directives policy, revised [DATE] showed: -Policy: The resident has the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. Advance directives are honored in accordance with state law and facility policy; -Policy implementation: The interdisciplinary team will review annually with the resident his or her advance directives to ensure that such directives are still the wishes of the resident. Such reviews will be made during the annual assessment process and recorded in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices, medical records were complete and accurately documented including the administration of medications and treatments for five residents (Resident #50, #20, #67, #7, and #51). The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's undated Administering Medication Policy, showed: -Policy statement: medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so; -The Director of Nursing (DON) Services will supervise and direct all nursing personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions; -The individual administering the medication must initial the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones; -If a dug is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications and physician orders were maintained for self-administration of medication for two residents observed with medications left at the bedside (Residents #42 and #62) and one resident who was not adequately supervised during medication administration (Resident #77). The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy, revised February 2021, showed: -Policy Statement: Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident; -If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one resident when staff failed to ensure the hot water faucet in the resident's was functioning properly (Resident #67). The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of Resident #67 medical record, showed: -Diagnoses of depression, Alzheimer's disease, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and mood disorder; -A Care Plan, dated 4/5/24, showed the resident can shower independently, requires only set up as needed. Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/5/24, showed: -Cognitively is intact; -Requires setup or clean-up assistance with showering or bathing. Observation and interview on 6/24/24 at 9:17 A.M., showed the hot water faucet located in the resident's bathroom did not function properly, when turned on, no water was produced. The resident said he/she prefers to bath in the sink located in his/her room because of the time it takes the staff to get him/her to the shower room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and document a discharge planning process involving the legal guardian for one resident (Resident #36) with an expressed interest in transitioning to a placement with a lower level of care. The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's Discharge Summary and Plan policy, revised October 2022, showed: -Every resident is evaluated for his or her discharge needs and has an individualized post-discharge plan; -The post-discharge plan is developed by the care planning/interdisciplinary team with the assistance of the resident and his or her family; -The discharge plan is re-evaluated based on changes in the resident's condition or needs prior to discharge; -The resident/representative is involved in the post-discharge planning process and informed of the final post-discharge plan; -Residents are asked about their interest in returning to the community. If the resident indicates an interest in returning to the community, he or she will be referred to local agencies and support services that can assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) received personal care, nail care, and facial hair hygiene in accordance with their needs and preferences (Residents #2, #19, #20, #7 and #17). The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's undated perineal (area including and between the genitals, hips and anal area) care policy, showed: -Purpose: to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infection, skin irritation and observe the skin condition; -Steps in the procedure: -Wash perineal area, cleaning front to back; -Separate the skin continuing to cleanse in a front to back motion; -Move from inside outward to the thighs. Rinse the skin in a same manner; -Clean the rectal area, front to back of the buttocks. Rinse and dry thoroughly. Review of the facility's undated ADL policy, showed: -Statement: Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed and documented for two of two sampled residents who experienced falls (Residents #42 and #79). The facility also failed to secure and lock the 200 unit medication cart. The sample was 18. The census was 79. 1. Review of the facility's undated fall policy, showed: -The nurse should assess and document and report vital signs, injury especially if a head injury, changes in range of motion, change in cognition or level of consciousness, neurological status, pain, frequency and number of falls since the last physician visit, factors on how the fall occurred, all medications and active diagnoses; -The staff will evaluate and document falls that occur while the individual is at the facility, for example when and where the fall happens, observations of the events; -Falls should be identified as witnessed or unwitnessed; -Monitoring and follow-up: -The staff, with the physician's guidance will follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when one resident (Resident #51) was not administered the ordered dose of Lasix (diuretic) for over two weeks. The sample was 18. The census was 79. Review of the facility's undated Medication Orders policy, showed: -The purpose of this procedure is to establish uniform guidelines in the receiving and recording of medication orders; -When recording orders for medications, specify the type, route, dosage, frequency, and strength of the medication ordered. Review of the facility's undated Administering Medications policy, showed: -Medication are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Review of Resident #51's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, diabetes, anxiety, high cholesterol, and pain; -An order, dated 6/10/24, for Lasix 20 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily for seven days. Obtain blood pressure for seven days,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary kitchen and food storage areas as evidenced by: a. undated, unlabeled, unsealed food in the refrigerators and freezers, b. dried food debris on the manual can opener blade, c. bulk food containers and storage units with debris on the outsides, d. food smears and debris on the outsides of refrigerators and freezers, e. food debris on the plate warmer plate holders, f. food containers on food preparation counters not labeled/dated and/or soiled, g. no documentation of sanitizer concentration testing of dish machine and 3-compartment sink, and h. no documentation of completed cleaning checklists. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents who resided in the facility and ate food prepared in the kitchen. Findings included: A review of the facility's Food Receiving and Storage policy, dated October 2017, revealed, Foods should be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure written information was provided to residents and/or their representatives regarding the right to formulate an advance directive and failed to ensure assistance with formulating an advance directive was offered for 3 (Resident #61, Resident #43, and Resident #47) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Advance Directives, revised 12/2016, revealed, 1. Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. 2. Written information will include a description of the facility's policies to implement advance directives and applicable state law. 3. If the resident is incapacitated and unable to receive information about his or her right to formulate an advance directive, the information may be provided to the resident's legal representative. 4. If the resident becomes able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, document review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Form CMS-10123 was provided to residents or their representatives prior to the end of Medicare Part A services when the residents' benefit days were not exhausted, that advance beneficiary notices (ABNs) of non-coverage were dated, and that the residents'/representatives' decision whether to continue services was indicated on the forms for 3 (Residents #7, #57, and #66) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. Findings included: 1. Review of a face sheet revealed Resident #7 had diagnoses that included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and osteoarthritis. Review of a SNF [Skilled Nursing Facility] Beneficiary Notification Review form for Resident #7 revealed the resident's Medicare Part A skilled services episode start date was 08/02/2022, and the last covered day of Part A service was 09/15/2022. The form indicated the facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when the resident's benefit days were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff under investigation for allegations of abuse were suspended in accordance with the facility's abuse prohibition policies and procedures for one staff member out of 5 staff reviewed in relation to abuse allegations. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised July 2017, revealed, The Administrator will suspend immediately any employee who has been accused of resident abuse, pending the outcome of the investigation. 1. Review of a face sheet revealed Resident #281 had diagnoses that included mild mental retardation, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), dementia, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #281 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. According to the MDS, Resident #281 exhibited no behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state- when reported to the facility by Resident #281. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised July 2017, indicated, Reporting: 2. An alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property) will be reported immediately, but not later than: a. Two (2) hours if the alleged violation involves abuse OR has resulted in serious bodily injury; or b. Twenty-four (24) hours if the alleged violation does not involve abuse AND has not resulted in serious bodily injury. During the entrance conference conducted on 10/31/2022 at 10:13 AM with the Owner, the Administrator (ADM), and the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility was asked to provide reports of allegations of abuse for the past 12 months. The Owner stated there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-04 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected residents' dental status for 2 (Resident #48 and Resident #60) of 3 residents reviewed for dental needs. Findings included: During an interview on 11/04/2022 at 8:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked for a facility policy regarding completion/accuracy of MDS assessments. No policy was provided prior to the conclusion of the survey. 1. Review of a face sheet revealed Resident #48 had diagnoses that included stroke, cognitive impairment, and diabetes. Observation of Resident #48 on 10/31/2022 at 2:32 PM revealed the resident had no teeth. Review of an annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 had modified independence in cognitive skills for daily decision-making per a staff assessment of mental status. The MDS indicated the resident was totally dependent for personal hygiene. Section L Oral/Dental Status was not accurately completed to indicate the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff treated two residents (Resident #34 and #21) with respect and dignity. Findings included: 1. Review of a face sheet revealed Resident #34 had diagnoses that included psychosis and arthritis. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #34 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. According to the MDS, the resident had delusions and exhibited verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others, and rejection of care on one to three days of the seven-day assessment period. Review of a Care Plan, dated 08/04/2022, revealed Resident #34 became annoyed easily and yelled and cursed at peers and staff and did not like people in their room or touching their things. During an interview with the surveyor on 10/31/2022 at 3:57 PM, Resident #34 alleged that CNA #7 was disgusting and abusive. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure self-administration of medication was clinically appropriate for 1 (Resident #46) of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medications. Observations revealed Resident #46 had an inhaled medication at the bedside and interviews revealed the resident self-administered the medication. Review of the record and interviews with staff revealed no evidence the facility had assessed the resident to be clinically appropriate to self-administer the medication. Findings included: A review of the face sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #46 with diagnoses that included anxiety, depression, lower leg osteomyelitis, and edema. A review of a progress note of an eye examination for Resident #46, dated 11/22/2021, indicated Resident #46 had age-related cataracts, bilaterally, causing significant blurred vision. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #46 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to personal privacy was maintained for 1 (Resident #33) of 2 residents reviewed for privacy. Observations revealed there was no door or privacy curtain that would maintain privacy during toileting for Resident #33. Findings included: A review of Resident #33's face sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident with diagnoses that included depression, schizophrenia, psychosis, schizo-affective schizophrenia, and suicidal ideations. A review of Resident #33's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 12, indicating the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS indicated the resident required supervision for all activities of daily living. A review of the resident's Multi-Disciplinary Problem Oriented Care Plan, last reviewed on 09/15/2022, indicated Resident #33 was continent of bowel and bladder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan that included trauma-informed interventions to address post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for 1 (Resident #281) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, revealed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy also indicated, 7. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: a. includes measurable objectives and timeframes; b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of a face sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #281 on 06/09/2021 with diagnoses which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 (Resident #3) of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. Specifically, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include interventions to prevent skin tears for Resident #3. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy indicated the care plan reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. The policy also indicated, 11. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. A review of the face sheet for Resident #3 indicated the facility admitted the resident with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was as free of accident hazards as possible and interventions to prevent further skin tears were developed and implemented for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, record review revealed the resident had a history of skin tears and observations revealed Resident #3 had a skin tear to the right arm with no interventions in place to prevent further skin tears. Additionally, observations revealed Resident #3's wheelchair had peeling vinyl on the armrest, creating a risk for further skin tears. Findings included: Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident required extensive assistance with transfers. The MDS did not indicate the resident had skin tears at the time of the assessment. Review of a Care Plan, dated as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. Observation of medication administration revealed there were 2 medication errors in 27 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41%. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications through a Metered Dose Inhaler, revised in October 2010, indicated in Paragraph 14, Administer medication: to d. Ask the resident to inhale and exhale deeply for a few breath cycles. On the last cycle, instruct the resident to exhale deeply. e. Place the mouthpiece in the mouth and instruct the resident to close his or her lips to form a seal around the mouthpiece. f. Firmly depress the mouthpiece against the medication canister to administer medication. g. Instruct the resident to inhale deeply and hold for several seconds. The policy further indicated, Repeat inhalation, if ordered. Allow at least one (1) minute between inhalations of the same medication and at least two (2) minutes between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to provide routine dental care for 2 (Resident #48 and Resident #60) of 3 residents reviewed for dental care. Findings included: The facility's policy titled, Availability of Services, Dental with a revision date of August 2017, indicated Oral healthcare and dental services will be provided to all residents. The policy also indicated under Paragraph 1 that Dental services are available to all residents requesting routine and emergency dental care. 1. A review of the face sheet for Resident #48 indicated the facility admitted the resident with diagnoses that included stroke, cognitive impairment, hypertension, diabetes, and depression. A review of Resident #48's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident had modified independence (some difficulty in new situations only) with cognitive skills for daily decision making based on the staff assessment of mental status and both the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a wheelchair was maintained in safe operating condition to prevent potential injury for 1 (Resident #5) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for wheelchair use. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Assistive Device and Equipment, revised January 2020, revealed, Our facility maintains and supervises the use of assistive devices and equipment for residents. The policy also indicated, Devices and equipment are maintained on schedule and according to manufacturer's instructions. Defective or worn devices are discarded or repaired. Review of a face sheet revealed Resident #5 had diagnoses including an above-the-knee amputation and diabetes. Review of an admission Nursing Assessment, dated 04/09/2021, revealed Resident #5's ambulation status was wheelchair only and wheelchair/propels self. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$92,561 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $17,668 — penalty dated 2025-08-01
  • $74,893 — penalty dated 2024-10-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-03 for 52 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bernard Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Bridgewood Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Brookfield Health Care CenterBrookfield, MO 1 of 5Brunswick Health Care CenterBrunswick, MO 1 of 5Cassville Health Care CenterCassville, MO 1 of 5Chariton Park Health Care CenterSalisbury, MO 1 of 5Crestwood Health Care CenterFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Eastview Manor Care CenterTrenton, MO 1 of 5Edgewood Manor Health Care CenterRaytown, MO 1 of 5Fair View Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Four Seasons Living CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Grand Manor Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Gregory Ridge Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Heritage Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Hidden Lake Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Holton Health Care CenterHolton, KS 1 of 5Legendary Health Care CenterMarshall, MO 1 of 5Milan Health Care CenterMilan, MO 1 of 5Nathan Richard Health Care CenterNevada, MO 1 of 5Nick's Health Care CenterPlattsburg, MO 1 of 5North Village ParkMoberly, MO 1 of 5Odessa Health Care CenterOdessa, MO 1 of 5Parkway Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Rest Haven Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Sarcoxie Health Care CenterSarcoxie, MO 1 of 5South County Health Care CenterArnold, MO 1 of 5Wellsville Health Care CenterWellsville, MO 1 of 5Westview Nursing HomeCenter, MO 2 of 5St Elizabeth Care CenterSaint Elizabeth, MO 2 of 5Stonecrest HealthcareViburnum, MO 3 of 5Greenville Health Care CenterGreenville, MO 3 of 5Portageville Health Care CenterPortageville, MONot rated (Special Focus)Hillside Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DESTEFANE, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
ARSHAD, ABDULLAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
WHITE, RIKEESHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
RICHARD J. DESTEFANE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUSTOrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
GIETNER ASSOCIATES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2024
RCG INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
RELIANT CARE GROUP OF WEBSTER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2024
TLG II LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+15.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$534K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 6%Other / private 4%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $534K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$186per resident / day
operating cost
$5,669per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$219per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265668. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next