No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Chariton Park Health Care Center

902 Manor Drive, Salisbury, MO 65281 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (660) 388-6486 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$198,116 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (84) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $198,116 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-30)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
413 W 2nd St · (660) 388-7084 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
227 S Broadway · (660) 388-6482 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
413 N Weber Ave · (660) 388-6600 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.1%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.5%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms68.9%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.2%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.8%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication39.6%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.6%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table59.7%23.5%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.1%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.4%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.982.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.652.331.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.06U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified80.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.601.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.12
RN hours/ resident / day
0.30
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
1.83
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.11
RN hoursweekends
53.3%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.83 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.12 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.88 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.13 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-30)
28
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

84 citations, most serious first. The 24 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (Resident #88), who was under guardianship, resided on a locked behavior unit, and had a history of elopement and polysubstance abuse, in a review of 30 residents, to ensure the resident did not leave the facility without staff's knowledge. Staff identified the resident was at risk for elopement. Staff reported they were to conduct 15-minute checks, and the resident's care plan identified staff were to ensure the resident was in view when outside in the courtyard. Staff did not consistently document 15 minute checks were completed. On 2/13/26, a resident notified staff he/she observed Resident #88 leave the facility through the plexiglass window in his/her room, hopped the fence, got into a car with someone in the parking lot, then came back in the same way he/she went out. Staff placed the resident on one-on-one supervision following the incident and then placed the resident on 15 minute face checks. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight and complete 15 minute safety checks (procedure for staff to verify the resident's location) as directed for one resident (Resident #1), in a review of seven residents. Resident #1 was a known elopement risk and was on 15 minute face checks for safety when the resident removed the security block from the windowsill (a rubber block screwed into the windowsill preventing the slide window from opening more than five inches) in his/her room, opened the window, removed the screen and climbed through the window to the exterior fenced courtyard. The resident pushed a picnic table next to the building, stood on the picnic table and climbed onto the roof, crossed the roof, and then jumped down into an open area. The resident walked from the back of the building, down the street, five blocks, until he/she was approached by a local police officer. The facility census was 111. On 3/12/26 at 11:15 A.M. the Administrator was notified of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat one resident (Resident #79), in a review of 30 sampled residents, with dignity and respect when staff did not provide reasonable accommodation with toileting and told the resident to urinate and defecate in his/her bed. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility policy, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, revised 9/21/25, showed the following:-It is the practice of this facility protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality;-Every resident has a right to be treated with dignity and respect;-All staff will speak to and treat all residents with dignity and respect;-All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights;-The resident's former lifestyle and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #4) was free from physical abuse when Resident #3 hit Resident #4 in the head multiple times. The facility also failed to ensure one resident (Resident #7) was free from verbal abuse and intimidation when Residents #3, #5, and #6 entered Resident #7's room and verbally intimidated and threatened to harm Resident #7 if he/she snitched on them for doing drugs and/or bringing drugs into the facility. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility's policy, Abuse and Neglect, dated 06/12/26, showed the following:-Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include resident to resident altercations;-Physical abuse is purposefully beating, striking, wounding, or injuring any resident or in any manner whatsoever mistreating or maltreating a resident in a brutal or inhumane manner;-Physical abuse includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement meaningful interventions, including non-pharmacological interventions and alternate strategies, to ensure residents on the secured locked unit were not witness to or personally affected by one resident's (Resident #5's) known, sexually inappropriate behaviors when Resident #5 made sexual comments to other residents, exposed his/her genitals to residents, and rubbed his/her genitals on other residents. Residents were upset by Resident #5's actions. The facility failed to investigate an incident involving three residents (Resident #3, #5 and #6) to identify and address the root cause for their behaviors after the residents intimidated and verbally threatened to harm one resident (Resident #7). A sample of eight residents was selected for review. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility's Behavioral Emergency Policy, revised 9/23/25, showed the following:-Non-physical interventions are the first choice as an intervention unless safety issues demand immediate physical intervention;-Proactive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of seven sampled residents, with diagnoses of mental illness and a history of trauma, received appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. The medical record showed on 02/10/26 at 5:48 P.M the resident's guardian/parent said the resident had voiced self-harm ideations. Two days later, on 02/12/26, the resident repeatedly asked for his/her television to watch Animal Planet, a known coping mechanism. Staff failed to provide additional interventions or a television to watch while supervising the resident one-on-one. As a result of not implementing the interventions as care planned, the resident became agitated and broke out a window (inside pane of a double pane glass window) in his/her room, picked up a shard of glass and cut his/her forearm from elbow to wrist. The resident was transported by ambulance to the psychiatric hospital for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #2), in a review of 14 sampled residents, from abuse. Resident #1, who had a diagnosis of intermittent explosive disorder (a mental health condition marked by frequent impulsive anger outbursts or aggression) and had a history of assault, approached Resident #2 and forcefully slammed Resident #2's head against the vending machine and struck Resident #2 multiple times in the face with a closed fist. Resident #2's sustained lacerations to the right eyebrow and upper lip that required sutures. The facility census was 113. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, last reviewed on 06/12/24, showed the following:-Abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish which included certain resident to resident altercations;-Physical abuse was purposefully beating, striking, wounding, or injuring any resident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #1), in a sample of seven residents, from physical abuse by another resident, (Resident #3), who had a history of aggressive behaviors. Staff failed to separate the residents and sufficiently monitor Resident #3 after he/she had initially verbally assaulted Resident #1. Resident #3 was able to return to the dining area and physically assault Resident #1. Resident #1 received scratches and had a large clump of hair pulled from his/her scalp. The facility census was 117. Review of the facility policy, Resident's Rights, dated (revised) 07/05/23, showed the facility must protect and promote rights of each resident, including freedom from verbal, sexual, mental and physical abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Review of the facility policy, Abuse and Neglect, dated (revised 06/12/24), showed the following: -Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish, which can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess three residents (#19, #47, and #115) for the ability to consent prior to having sexual relations and failed to protect one resident (Resident #47) from sexual abuse by a resident (Resident #115). Resident #47 reported feeling worthless, having a flashback, and fear of contracting STDs (Sexual Transmitted Diseases). A sample of fourteen residents was selected for review. The facility census was 115. Review of the facility's Sexual Activity/Abuse and Neglect Policy, last reviewed 4/18/22, showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility provides protective oversight and care for all residents requesting to engage in sexual activity/intercourse while at the same time protecting their rights; -Residents that are wishing to engage in sexual activity/intercourse will be allowed to participate in these activities as long as both parties consent and have the ability to consent. Non-consensual acts and acts that impact negatively on the resident community, such as public displays,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #13) with a mental health disorder, in a review of 13 sampled residents, received individualized treatment and services to meet his/her psychosocial needs. The resident had a history of alcohol use, impulsiveness, self-mutilation, and multiple suicide attempts. On 8/3/23, the resident cut himself/herself and swallowed batteries. Staff believed the resident's behavior was a result of staff confiscating contraband (chewing tobacco and cigarettes) after the resident returned to the facility after attending church. On 11/5/23, staff reported the resident was upset when staff confiscated chewing tobacco, cigarettes and two bottles of alcohol-based hand sanitizer upon the resident's return from attending church. The resident also presented with signs/symptoms of alcohol consumption. On 11/12/23 and 11/13/23, the resident refused his/her medications and reported to staff he/she was upset about not having hand sanitizer. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure weights were monitored weekly after a significant weight loss was identified as directed in the facility policy, failed to provide interventions as ordered by the physician to prevent weight loss, failed to re-evaluate interventions to prevent weight loss for effectiveness, failed to monitor the meal and supplement consumption as directed in the facility policy, failed to update the resident's care plan to reflect the resident's current orders/interventions as directed in the facility policy, and failed to ensure dental needs were identified and actions taken to prevent further weight loss for one resident (Resident #21), who had a 14.5% significant weight loss, in a review of 31 sampled residents. The facility census was 108. Review of the facility's policy, Weight Loss, last revised 2/26/21, showed the following: -Maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight and protein level, unless the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date, seal or cover food items, ensure the ice/water dispensing machines were free of a buildup of debris, to cover all facial hear with beard restraints, and to ensure the floor next to the kitchen ice machine was free of a buildup of debris. The facility census was 116. 1. Review of the undated facility policy, Food Storage, showed the following:-Label and date all storage containers as follows;-The date received should already be on it;-Date opened;-Date the item expires. Observation on 04/26/26 at 9:58 A.M. showed the following:-A refrigerator contained six pitchers of lemonade (one dated 4-25) and eight undated pitchers of tea;-A refrigerator contained ten uncovered and undated bowls of pudding and brownies. During an interview on 04/26/26 at 9:58 A.M., Dietary Staff Y said he/she was going to throw the bowls of pudding and brownies away but had not. He/She placed older pitchers of tea and lemonade in the front of the refrigerator, and he/she placed new/fresh pitchers in the back. He/She was supposed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop complete policies and procedures to monitor the facility's water system and implement the facility policy to monitor for Legionella (a bacterium that can cause a serious type of pneumonia called Legionnaires' disease) that included specific control parameters based on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)) standards. The facility failed to follow current infection control standards for multiple residents, in a review of 30 sampled residents, and one additionally sampled resident. The facility failed to follow infection control practices while performing blood glucose monitoring (a procedure where a drop of blood is obtained to test the amount of sugar in the blood) for one resident (Resident #44) when staff failed to perform hand hygiene to protect against the spread of infection. The facility failed to ensure staff washed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff placed call lights within the resident's reach for five residents (Residents #48, # 12, #71, #11, and #79), in a review of 30 sampled residents, as directed in the resident's plan of care and per facility policy. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy, Call Lights Accessibility and Timely Response, revised on 04/30/24, showed the following:-The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response;-Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of the resident and secured, as needed;-The call system will be accessible to residents while in their bed or other sleeping accommodations within the resident's room. 1. Review of Resident #48's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment, keeping the floors, walls, privacy curtains and windows in good repair and working order in the facility. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's undated policy, Environment, showed the following:-The facility will be maintained in a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike setting;-Housekeeping and maintenance service in the dietary department will maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable dining area;-A homelike environment will be maintained with attractive tables, decor, and a pleasant dining area atmosphere. Review of the facility's policy, Safe and Homelike Environment, revised 06/05/24, showed the following:-In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment; -Environment refers to any environment in the facility that is frequented by residents, including but not limited to, the residents' rooms, bathrooms, hallways,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to report a resident-to-resident altercation for two residents (Resident #88 and #23), in a review of 30 sampled residents, to the Administrator when Resident #23 struck Resident #88, per the facility's abuse policy. The facility census was 116.Review of the facility policy, Abuse and Neglect, updated 06/12/24, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to ensure all allegations of abuse are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed time frames;-Abuse is the willful infliction of injury which can include certain resident to resident altercations. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, and physical abuse;-Verbal abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for three residents (Residents #2, #70 and #10), in a review of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.20.1, Chapter 1, revised October 2025, showed the following:-Comprehensive MDSs include admission, annual, significant change in status assessment and significant change in prior assessment;-The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process has multiple regulatory requirements. Federal regulations at 42 CFR 483.20 (b)(1)(xviii), (g), and (h) require that:(1) the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status;(2) a registered nurse conducts or coordinates each assessment with the appropriate participation of health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for four residents (Residents #71, #79, #105, and #2), in a review of 30 sampled residents, when staff did not develop a care plan to address pertinent care areas, including pain, a pressure ulcer, smoking, and a urinary catheter. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 10/31/24, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment;-The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care. Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise resident care plans to accurately reflect current care needs for five residents (Residents #10, #13, #70, #2 and #79), in a review of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on [DATE], showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment;-The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment;-The comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's needs as identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete an assessment to identify the history of trauma, the presence of symptoms related to the trauma, and triggers that may cause re-traumatization and to develop an individualized care plan with interventions to mitigate and eliminate these triggers for three residents (Residents #88, #6 and #23), in a review of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy, Trauma Informed Care, revised 05/14/24, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to provide care and services which, in addition to meeting professional standards, are delivered using approaches which are culturally competent, account for experiences and preferences, and address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization;-Trauma results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life threatening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four nurse aides completed a nurse aide (NA) training program within four months of their employment in the facility. The census was 116. Review of the facility's policy, Nurse Aide Training Program, revised 05/18/24, showed the following:-Purpose: This facility maintains an appropriate and effective nurse aide in-service training program for the purpose of ensuring the continuing competence of nurse aides;-The facility, with oversight from the Director of Nursing, shall be responsible for the coordination and/or provision of nurse aide education. Review of the facility's' undated Hospitality Aide Duties, showed the following:-Purpose: The Hospitality Aide position is a way to ensure there is extra support within the facility to help assist with non-nursing duties. To help ensure proper and effective guidelines for the role and tasks of all Hospitality Aides:-Walking rounds;-Intensive monitoring (frequent checks and one-on-one monitoring);-Assisting with smoking breaks for residents;-Cleaning of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 60 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued and course completed medications, stored in the Station One medication storage room, were destroyed within 30 days according to the facility policy, for one resident (Resident #12), in a review of 30 sampled residents, and for three additional residents (Residents #37, #45 and #87). The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's Medication Destruction Policy, revised 6/26/24, showed the following:-Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to ensure medications that cannot be returned to the dispensing pharmacy are destroyed;-Medications should be destroyed weekly if possible but at a minimum of monthly;-The DON is responsible for ensuring that the medications that are no longer needed are being kept securely and destroyed properly. 1. Review of Resident #12's physicians order summary report, dated March 2026, showed the following:-An order, dated 03/02/26, to discontinue atorvastatin calcium (a cholesterol medication) 40 milligrams (mg), give two tablets via peg tube (g-tube, surgical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a nourishing and well-balanced diet to meet dietary needs when staff failed to follow the recipe when preparing the lunch entree on 04/27/26 and failed to ensure staff prepared sufficient food to serve all residents the food items on the lunch menu for 04/27/26. The facility census was 116. Review of the Diet Spreadsheet on 4/27/26 for the lunch meal showed the meal was to include ravioli bake (one slice), cauliflower, breadstick, and apple orchard bar. Observation on 4/27/26 between 12:00 P.M. and 12:45 P.M. during the lunch meal service showed Dietary Staff M served ravioli bake, cauliflower, rolls and canned fruit. Observation on 4/27/26 at 12:46 P.M. during the lunch meal service showed the kitchen ran out of the ravioli bake entree and rolls. Staff served three residents on the 500 Hall the entree. Staff served the remaining residents (approximately 15 residents) on the 500 Hall a ham and cheese sandwich instead of the ravioli bake entree and served biscuits instead of rolls. During interviews on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food items to conserve nutritive value, flavor, appearance and temperature. The facility census was 116. Review of the undated facility policy, Food Temperatures, showed the following:-Foods will be served at proper temperature to ensure food safety;-Take the temperature of each pan of product before serving;-Acceptable serving temperatures are: -Cereal, gravy, casseroles, meat, entrees, potatoes, pasta, soup, pureed foods, hot pureed foods, cold vegetables, coffee: >140 degrees but preferably 160-175 degrees; -Hazardous salads and desserts <41 degrees; -Eggs 140-155 degrees;-If temperatures are not at acceptable levels and cannot be corrected in time for meal service, make an appropriate menu substitution and discarded out of temperature range foods. 1. During an interview on 04/26/26 at 11:19 A.M., Resident #6 said the food was not good. The food was fake and rubbery and was very low-quality food. Most of the time, the food had no flavor and was served at room temperature. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated residents' allergies, intolerances, and preferences, when staff served fish to one resident (Resident #120), who had an allergy to fish and seafood which resulted in an allergic reaction of a rash and itching skin that required medication. The facility failed to provide food/drink items to one resident (Resident #5), in a review of 30 sampled residents, and one additional resident (Resident #55) per their preference. The facility census was 116. Review of the undated facility policy, Diet Identification Card, showed the following:-A diet identification tray card will be completed for each resident by authorized Dietary personnel to ensure residents receive the proper diet as ordered by the physician;-Include information as appropriate, such as beverage and food preferences and food allergies. 1. Review of Resident #120's face sheet showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure compliance with the Federal requirement for nurse aide training when the facility charged nurse aides, employed by the facility, for the cost of the nurse aide training program. The facility census was 116.Review of the Code of Federal Regulation, 42 CFR 483.152 Requirements for approval of a nurse aide training and competency evaluation program, showed the following:(c) Prohibition of charges. (1) No nurse aide who is employed by, or who has received an offer of employment from, a facility on the date on which the aide begins a nurse aide training and competency evaluation program may be charged for any portion of the program (including any fees for textbooks or other required course materials).Review of the undated facility policy, Agreement Between (the facility corporation) and Employee Regarding Payment for CNA Courses, showed the following: -This agreement (Agreement) is made and entered into by and between (the facility corporation) (hereinafter referred to as the Employer) and the undersigned employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call system was audible to ensure staff were alerted to the residents' request for assistance. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy, Call Lights Accessibility and Timely Response, revised on [DATE], showed the following:-The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response;-Staff will report problems with a call light or the call system immediately to the supervisor and/or maintenance director and will provide immediate or alternative solutions until the problem can be remedied. (Examples include: replace call light, provide a bell or whistle, increase frequency of rounding, etc.);-Ensure the call system alerts staff members directly or goes to a centralized staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0920 — pattern
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient seating in the Station One dining area to accommodate all residents for dining. Fifty-eight residents lived on the 100, 200, and 300 halls and shared the Station One dining area. The facility census was 116. Observation on 04/26/26 at 12:10 P.M., of the Station One dining area showed the following:-Twelve standard height dining room chairs;-Ten tall chairs were placed along the back wall with no tables in front of them and three tall chairs were placed between two shorter dining tables along a half wall. The chairs were taller than the tables;-One resident turned one of the tall chairs around to use at the shorter table for dining service. The was not a standard height dining room chair available for him/her;-Two residents with wheeled walkers sat in tall chairs with no table to eat from. There were no available standard height dining chairs for the two residents to sit in. Observation on 04/26/26 at 12:23 P.M., during the lunch service in the Station One dining room, showed Resident #105 sat on a tall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's abuse and neglect policy to protect two residents (Residents #23 and #88), who were involved in a resident-to-resident altercation, when staff did not implement measures to remove the residents from contact with one another and evaluate and monitor the residents to prevent further incidents. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy Abuse and Neglect, updated 06/12/24, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility;-Abuse is the willful infliction of injury which can include certain resident-to-resident altercations. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse and physical abuse;-Verbal Abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow proper immediate discharge procedure for one resident (Resident #10), in a review of eight sampled residents, by not identifying a proper discharge location. Resident #10 experienced increased aggressive behaviors and was sent to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation on 12/19/25. Once the resident was at the hospital, the facility determined they were unable to meet the resident's needs and sent an immediate discharge notice to the hospital on [DATE]. The facility identified the psychiatric hospital was the discharge location and did not plan to readmit the resident until after a decision was made following a hearing on 01/07/26. The facility did not amend the immediate discharge notice with an appropriate discharge location. The facility's census was 114. Review of the facility's Immediate Discharge Policy, last reviewed on 06/12/25, showed the following: -In a situation where the facility initiates a discharge while the resident is in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-24 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity when residents on the secured unit only had plastic forks and spoons provided to use for meal service. The facility provided no knives for resident use. Residents reported having to use their hands to eat meat because the meat could not be cut with a plastic fork or spoon. Fifty-seven residents resided on the secured unit. The facility census was 113. Review of the facility's policy for Promoting/Maintaining Dignity, last revised on 09/21/25, showed the following:-It was the practice of the facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and an environment that maintained or enhanced resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality;-The resident's former lifestyle and personal choices would be considered when providing care and services to meet the resident's needs and preferences. 1. Observation of the lunch meal served in the secured unit on 11/17/25 at 12:34 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from obtaining illegal substances when staff failed to follow their policy to search and inventory one resident's (Resident #3's) personal belongings upon admission and failed to remove items that were not allowed in the facility. Resident #3 reported he/she brought a dab pen (a portable device that contains cannabis/marijuana concentrate), 20 tablets of Adderall (a prescription medication used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy. It is also used recreationally as a euphoriant), and bath salts (an illegal synthetic substance that increases brain and central nervous system activity similar to cocaine and methamphetamines) to the facility upon his/her admission and shared the illegal substances and prescription medication with other residents including three residents (Residents #5, #6, and #7), in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 113.Review of the facility's policy for admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff documented the rationale for use of as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medications to ensure adequate indication for use as directed in facility policy for one resident (Resident #1), in a review of 14 sampled residents. The facility's census was 113. Review of the facility's policy for PRN Medication Use, last reviewed on 05/18/24, showed the following:-PRN medications referred to a medication that is taken as needed for a specific situation. It was not provided routinely and required assessment for need and effectiveness;-Indications for use is the identified, documented clinical rationale for administering a medication that was based upon assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals and is consistent with the manufacturer's recommendations and/or current evidence-based practice or standards;-Documentation would be provided in the resident's medical record to show adequate indications for medications use and the diagnosed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff notified one resident's (Resident #8) physician and nurse practitioner who worked in collaboration with the physician, and the resident's representative when the resident refused an ordered diagnostic procedure, experienced weight loss and had low blood pressure readings, in a review of seven sampled residents and two closed records .The facility census was 115. Review of the facility policy titled, Notification of Changes Policy, dated 5/14/24 showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consult's the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification; -Need to alter treatment significantly means a need to stop a form of treatment because of adverse consequences (such as adverse drug reaction), or commence a new form of treatment to deal with a problem (for example, the use of any medical procedure, or therapy that has not been used on that resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and serve double portions or a double entree at meals for five residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #7, and #8), out of review of five residents who had physician's orders for double portions/entree. The facility census was 113. 1. Review of the Diet Spreadsheet menu for the lunch meal on 4/1/25 showed staff were to serve the following items to residents on a regular diet: -A 6-ounce serving of sweet and sour chicken; -A 4-ounce serving of steamed rice; -A 4-ounce serving of sauteed peppers and onions. Review of the Diet Type Report, dated 4/1/25, showed five residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #7, and #8) were to receive double entrees with all meals or double portions with each meal. 2. Review of Resident #2's physician order sheet, dated April 2025, showed an order for a regular diet and double entrée. Record review on 4/1/25 of the Diet Type Report, dated 4/1/25, showed the resident was to receive a regular diet with a double entrée. During an interview on 4/1/25 at 9:15 A.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision/oversight following an altercation involving two residents (Resident #1 and #3), in a review of seven sampled residents. While Residents #1 and #3 were on one-on-one supervision following the altercation, staff failed to adequately separate the residents and intervene to ensure the second altercation, involving Resident #1 and #2, did not occur. The facility census was 117. Review of the facility's Behavioral Emergency Policy, last revised 6/26/24, showed the following: -All staff should recognize when the resident has become or can become a danger to themselves or someone else. De-escalation techniques should be utilized as first resort; -Should the resident exhibit extreme behaviors such as resident-to-resident altercations which did not respond to non-violent intervention, the licensed nursing staff and/or nursing administration will assess the resident who is displaying signs of crisis, ensuring that safety of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse involving two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3), in a sample of seven residents, to the state agency (SA) as required. The facility census was 117. Review of the facility policy, Abuse and Neglect, dated (revised 06/12/24), showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources or misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulation within prescribed time frames; -Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish, which can include certain resident to resident altercations. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of verbal and physical resident to resident abuse involving two residents (Resident #1 and #3) in a sample of seven residents reviewed. The facility census was 117. Review of the facility policy, Abuse and Neglect, dated (revised 06/12/24), showed the following: -Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology; -The facility will investigate all allegations and types of incidents as listed above in accordance to the facility procedure for reporting/response; -The administrator or designee will complete an administrative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of 15 sampled residents, remained free from abuse when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A engaged in text communication of a sexual nature in response to one resident's (Resident #1's), requests on social media for a sexual relationship with LPN A. The resident had diagnoses of physical and mental health disorders, resided on a secured unit for residents with behaviors, and was under guardianship. The facility census was 113. On 8/7/24 at 5:15 P.M., the administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 7/14/24. On 8/1/24, the administrator became aware of the violation of abuse, regarding sexual text messages to Resident #1 by LPN A. Upon discovery, the facility conducted an investigation, notified appropriate parties, suspended LPN A and all facility staff were educated on the facility abuse and neglect policy and social media policy. LPN A self terminated on 8/3/24. The deficiency was corrected on 8/3/24 after all staff had been inserviced and LPN A was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and sanitation. Staff failed to ensure opened food items were sealed and ensure food items in damaged containers were segregated from food items in active use. Staff failed to ensure resident food items, located in a unit refrigerator outside of the kitchen, were stored under sanitary conditions. Staff failed to ensure trash cans in the kitchen were covered when not in use. Staff failed to ensure ice and water dispensing machines were clean and ensure an air gap was present at each ice machine drain to prevent potential backflow of liquids back into the units. Staff failed to ensure food preparation surfaces were appropriately cleaned and sanitized and staff were knowledgeable about sanitization procedures and use of the dishwashing machine. Staff failed to ensure food and beverage containers and utensils were in good condition and protected from moisture, debris, and other contaminants. Staff failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five residents (Resident #61, #100, #31, #67 and #91) in a review of 34 sampled residents, and two additional residents (Resident #27 and #40), were treated in a manner to maintain dignity and respect, or honor the right to make choices. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's policy, Dignity and Respect, revised on 06/29/23, showed the following: -The purpose of the policy is to ensure that every resident is treated with dignity and respect; -Every resident has a right to be treated with dignity and respect; -All staff will speak to and treat all residents with dignity and respect; -Residents have the right to retain and use personal possessions to assist each resident in maintaining their independence, subject to reasonable limitations to protect the health and safety of residents and space limitations. 1. During the group resident council, on 03/06/24, at 1:04 P.M., various residents said the following: -They do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to retain and use personal possessions, including instant coffee, when the facility kept residents' instant coffee locked up in the medication room and controlled the times the residents could access their coffee. This affected three residents (Residents #31, #91 and #106), in a review of 34 sampled residents, and four additional residents (Residents #50, #56, #60, and #75). The facility held coffee for eight residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's policy, Resident's Rights, revised on 07/05/23, showed the following: -The purpose of the policy is to ensure that resident rights are protected; -Resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside of the facility; -Facility must protect and promote rights of each resident; -Resident has the right to retain and use personal possessions, including some…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one resident (Resident #81) in a review of 34 sampled residents, when staff did not ensure the resident had an appropriate and comfortable alternative chair to sit in when the resident would request to get out of bed. The facility also failed to provide adequate seating in the Station 2 common/dining area. This affected all residents residing in Station 2. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, revised 07/25/2023 showed the following: -The resident has the right to reside and receive services with reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences; -The resident has a right to be free from chemical or physical restraints. 1. Record review of Resident #81's Physician Order Sheet (POS) showed the resident's wheelchair was to be evaluated for repairs and fixed as needed (order dated 11/07/23). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly and follow up with a response to residents' concerns that were voiced in resident council meetings. The facility also failed to have monthly resident council meetings. The facility census was 116. Review of the resident council meeting minutes, dated 12/2023, showed the following: -Station one: -No old business listed; -New business concerns: one resident needing clothes out of storage, laundry shrinking clothes, missing nightgown and socks; -Request for dietary to serve frozen fruit; -There was no documentation of the concerns being communicated to the staff for resolutions; -No documentation of a resolution related to the concerns; -Station two: -Old business: unclear as to what this was referring to, just listed a few resident names and winter coat; -Concern of vending machine taking money, therapy with two residents listed with a question mark, two residents needing new glasses, one wants off crushed medications, two staff members…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean, sanitary and orderly environment. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy, Clean Check Training System, dated 2015, showed the following: -Routine cleaning of an occupied room included: - Remove trash and dispose of sharps; -Clean and disinfect high touch surfaces; -Spot clean walls and glass; -Clean resident restroom; -Hard floor care; -Additional periodic common area cleaning task; -Additional surface disinfection; -Windows; -Floor burnishing. 1. Observation on 03/06/24, at 9:29 P.M., showed the door frame going into the shower room/bathroom on 200 hall was marred and had missing paint in multiple places. Observation on 03/06/24, at 9:24 P.M., in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] showed the following: -Multiple areas in the room with torn drywall exposing the under lying drywall paper; -Multiple gouged areas behind bed 1 exposing the white drywall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents knew how to file a grievance, where grievance forms were located or how to complete a grievance form. Residents said they felt there concerns were not heard or addressed. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, dated 7/5/23, showed the following: -The resident has the right to: 1. Voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished; 2. Prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances the resident may have including those with respect to the behavior of other residents; -The resident has a right to voice grievances and recommend changes to policies and services to facility staff or outside representatives of his/her choice; -The resident has the right to be free from restraint, interference, coercion, discrimination, and reprisal from the facility for exercising his/her rights. Review of the facility policy, Grievance Policy - Residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete required pre-employment screenings for four of eight sampled employees hired since the previous survey. The facility failed to request a criminal background check (CBC) for two employees, check the Employee Disqualification List (EDL) for three employees, and check the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry for three employees, prior to hire as directed by facility policy. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy, Screening - Applicant, Employee, Volunteer and Vendor, revised 06/29/23, showed the following: -The Human Resources (HR) department will conduct pre-employment screenings on applicants to determine if the applicant has committed a disqualifying crime, is an excluded provider in any Federal or State healthcare programs and is duly licensed or certified to perform the duties of the position they applied, if applicable. -HR staff will conduct the following screens on potential employees prior to hire: Criminal History, Federal Exclusion Lists, Licensure, Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR, a registry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared and safely administered medications to five residents (Resident #67, #6, #102, #60 and #108) when Certified Medication Technician (CMT) I prepared the resident's medications and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)/CMT/Team Lead G administered the medications. The facility failed to obtain a physician order for Resident #60 to self-administer his/her own eye drops. The facility failed to complete accuchecks (a test to check sugar levels in the blood) as ordered for one resident (resident #81), in a review of 34 sampled residents, and failed to obtain a urinalysis when ordered for one resident (Resident #12). The facility failed to document the narcotic counts were completed by two staff. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's Medication Administration and Monitoring Policy, revised 09/20/23, showed the following: -The purpose is to ensure a process is in place for proper administration of medications, techniques of administering medications, effective monitoring of residents for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of meaningful activities on a daily basis to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for five residents (Resident #25, #48, #110, #116 and #96) out of 34 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's Activities Policy, revised on 07/19/23, showed the following: -Purpose: the purpose of this policy is to ensure that all residents in the facility are provided on ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with comprehensive assessments, their interests and there physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; -The life enhancement director coordinates section F of the comprehensive assessment and ensures that activities are designed to promote and enhance the emotional health, self esteem, pleasure, comfort, education, creativity, success ad independence for all residents, based on interview and assessing the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure systems were put in place for one resident to ensure the resident's safety, (Resident #102), after the resident expressed suicidal ideations and said he/she would self-harm by placing a bag over his/her head, and failed to ensure staff placed one resident's (Resident #48's), feet on wheelchair foot pedals to prevent accidents or injuries of 34 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure effective interventions were implemented to ensure one resident (Resident #21), of 20 additional residents, was not transported in his/her rollator walker, when another resident routinely pushed Resident #21 backwards in the walker to his/her room. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy, Intensive Monitoring/Visual Checks,revised 6/30/23, showed the following: -PURPOSE: To ensure a system is in place for residents who require increased monitoring for behavioral/psychiatric and medical issues; -Residents who require more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer sufficient fluids to maintain proper hydration and health when staff failed to pass and offer water to three sampled residents (Resident #48, #96 and #110) out of 34 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy for Hydration dated 6/29/23 showed: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure that a hydration program is in place in each facility, to monitor hydration of residents and to define clinical symptoms of dehydration. The policy will also address assessment of residents at risk for dehydration and put a plan in place to identify nursing interventions including an interdisciplinary team approach in addressing the resident who is at increased risk for dehydration or the resident that requires special assistance or special monitoring of fluid intake; -Fluid will be passed every two hours with the exception of meal times and night shift. The night shift staff will ensure that fresh water is passed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two nurse aids (NA BB and NA U) of three staff reviewed, completed a certified nurse aid (CNA) training program within four months of their employment in the facility. The facility census was 116. Review of an electronic mail communication on 03/22/24 at 9:52 A.M., the Director of Nursing said the facility did not have a specific policy on Nursing Assistant and Certified Nursing Assistant training program. 1. Review of the facility provided list of employees hired since last annual survey showed the following: -NA BB's date of hire was 02/09/23; -NA U's date of hire was 06/02/23. 2. Review of NA B's employee file showed no documentation he/she completed a CNA training program within four months of his/her hire date. 3. Review of NA U's employee file showed no documentation he/she completed a CNA training program without four months of his/her hire date. 4. During an interview on 03/13/24 at 2:40 P.M., the Administrator said the following: -He was responsible for enrolling all NAs in the training program; -He was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Residents #28, #48, #95 and #96), who were prescribed psychotropic medications, in a review of 34 sampled residents, received a gradual dose reduction (GDR), unless clinically contraindicated. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's Medication Administration and Monitoring Policy, revised 09/20/23, showed the following: -The purpose is to ensure a process is in place for proper administration of medications, techniques of administering medications, effective monitoring of residents for adverse consequences associated with side effects to medications; -The facility will confer the pharmacist consultant and utilize drug reference guideline sources to ensure that residents receive medications safely without negative outcomes; -Each resident's drug regimen will be reviewed monthly by a licensed pharmacist. Any irregularities or concerns will be given to the physician and Director of Nursing (DON); -All pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard an opened insulin pen after 28 days of use for one resident (Resident #67), in a review of four sampled residents with insulin pens. The facility failed to dispose of house stock influenza vaccine after it had expired. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's Monthly Inspections - Medications Policy, revised 07/05/22, showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the facility is monitoring the labeling and storage of all medications within the facility on a routine monthly basis; -The facility will utilize a pharmacy consultant to review the facility's storage of medications, that will include inspections of the medication carts and medication rooms; -The charge nurse on night shift will complete a monthly review of all medication carts and medication rooms on the last Saturday of every month; -The medication carts and medication rooms will reviewed for the following areas: a. Refrigerator checks: iii. content, iv. controlled medications - locked and counted; b. To…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of the residents and failed to ensure staff served the correct portion sizes to residents as meals. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's Dietary Food Preparation, revised 07/05/23, showed the following: -Standardized recipes will be used for all products prepared; -Uniform portions shall be established for each diet served to all residents; -Provide proper equipment for portioning out the correct quantity of food for the residents; -Instruct all dietary employees in the procedures of standardized portions; -Recipes and menus will have appropriated portions noted; -The dietary manager will monitor for the cooks and their use of portion control utensils on tray line. Review of the facility policy, Dietary Menu Planning and Nourishment, revised 7/5/23, showed the following: -Menus are implemented by the Dietary Manager in conjunction with the Registered Dietitian; -When changes in the menu are necessary, the changes must provide equal nutritive value; -Menu changes are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide each resident with palatable meals served at appetizing temperatures or a variety snacks for 10 residents (Resident #67, #91, #57, #61, #100, #33, #70, #81, #97 and #106) in a review of 34 sampled residents and four additional residents (Resident #4, #27, #116 and #24) . The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's Dietary Menu Planning and Nourishment Policy, revised 07/05/23, showed the following: -Menu planning is there responsibility of Health Technologies and meet the requirements of the Department of Health and Senior Services; -The menus are three meal plus a snack; -Nourishments will be provided to offer therapeutic nutritional support; A physician's order will be required; -Residents receiving nourishments may include those who are underweight, who are on therapeutic diets an those with poor intake, weight loss, skin problems low albumin and other problems addressed on care plans; -When an order for a house…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 10. Review of Resident #5's progress notes, dated 3/04/24 at 6:02 A.M., showed the resident tested positive for COVID-19 and was compliant with isolation. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 3/04/24, showed the following: -The resident tested positive for COVID-19; -Educate staff, residents, family and visitors of COVID-19 signs and symptoms and precautions to follow; -Follow facility protocol for COVID-19 screening and precautions. Observation on 3/05/24 at 3:25 P.M., showed the following: -There was a plastic barrier duct taped top to the resident's door with a red zipper down the middle facing the hallway; -There was no personal protective equipment outside of the resident's door; -There was no hand sanitizer outside of the resident's door; -There was no trash receptacle outside of the resident's door; -The resident sat on a recliner inside of his/her room; -There was no large trash receptacle inside the resident's room; -There was no signage posted on the resident's door or wall by his/her door stating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and/or responsible parties when three residents (Residents #19, #55 and #106), in a review of 34 residents, had a change in condition. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's Notifying Clinicians Policy, revised 08/23/22, showed the following: -The purpose of the policy is to outline indications of when to notify the physician; -The physician is to be called on, but not limited to: a. Medical emergency: excessive nausea/vomiting/diarrhea, falls, incidents/injuries, hypo/hypertensive episodes (low/high blood pressure), hypo/hyperglycemic episodes (low/high blood sugar), desaturation (drop of oxygen level)/respiratory distress, any changes in lung sounds/positive results in rapid Covid tests, change in condition; b. Behavioral emergencies; -The nurse will initiate verbal communication with physician, nurse practitioner, or professional nurse when a condition or incident arises with resident which would warrant an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #46 ), out of 34 sampled residents, remained free from misappropriation of property, when a facility employee took $450.00 of Resident #46's money when the resident offered to assist the employee with unpaid bills. The facility census was 116. The administrator was notified on 3/12/24 at 10:00 A.M., of the Past Non-compliance which occurred on 3/2/24. On 3/2/24, the administrator became aware of the violation of misappropriation of resident money. The facility began the investigation and terminated the employee on 3/2/24 for taking money from Resident #46. The resident received $450.00, full reimbursement of his/her funds. Staff were inserviced regarding the facility policy for misappropriation and facility expectation. The D grid deficiency was removed and corrected on 3/2/24. Review of the facility policy for Abuse and Neglect with a revision date of 1/5/23 showed the following: -Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a decline in limited range of motions or development/worsening of contractures (shortening and hardening of the muscles, tendons, and other tissues, often causing deformity and rigidity of joints) for one resident (Resident #28), in a review of 34 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. The restorative nursing policy was requested and not provided. Review of the facility policy, Physician's Orders for Therapy, revised on 06/29/23, showed the following: -Nursing to therapy communication forms will be initiated by a licensed Registered Nurse (RN); -All admissions, re-admissions and changes in functional status, that require therapeutic intervention will be screened for therapy services; -Therapy screening forms will be attached to the therapy recommendation form, a copy will be given to the Director of Nursing (DON) and Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator to review and obtain Physician approval; -If the therapy screening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to asses residents for risk of entrapment, document attempted alternatives prior to installing a bed rail, and failed to obtain informed consent with risks prior to installing and using a bed rail for two residents (Residents #32 and #35), who had assist bars attached to their bed, in a review of 34 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility Bed Siderails policy, reviewed 6/29/23, showed the following: -To ensure all bed side rails in use have been evaluated for safety; -All residents using any size side rail device on their beds will have a Restraint/Entrapment Assessment completed to determine the restraining, enabling, or hazard effect of the device. This assessment will occur upon initial use, quarterly, and as needed if there is a significant change in the resident's condition; -Using steps 1 and 2 of the Restraint/Entrapment Assessment, each resident using a side rail device will be assessed to determine if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately administer insulin (a hormone used to treat diabetes) to one resident (Resident #76) and one additional resident (Resident#75), of four sampled residents who received insulin injections, when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Y did not prime (remove air bubbles) the insulin pens prior to administration and did not hold the needle in the skin for six seconds after administration as directed by the manufacturer of the medication. The census was 116. Review of the facility's Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Administration Policy, dated 06/29/23, showed it did not address the specific procedure to follow when administering insulin via an insulin pen and only addressed insulin administration via vial and syringe. Review of the manufacturer's information for Novolog insulin FlexPen showed the following: -Before each injection, small amounts of air may collect in the cartridge during normal use. To avoid injecting air and to ensure proper dosing, turn the dose selector to 2 units. Hold the FlexPen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Residents #48), in a review of 34 sampled residents, received dental services and failed to follow up with recommendations for further dental intervention. The facility census was 164. The facility did not provide a policy for dental services. 1. Review of Resident #48's care plan dated 8/14/20 showed no care plan to address dental care or dental issues. Review of the resident's nurses notes dated 11/21/2023 at 3:23 P.M., showed the resident was seen by a local dental clinic. There are multiple areas of decay, non restorable teeth. A referral will be sent to an oral surgeon, the resident needs extraction of all remaining teeth. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/19/24 showed the following: -The resident is sometimes able to make self understood, and sometimes able to understand others; -Unable to make decisions; -Dependent upon staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and brushing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal vaccine (a vaccine that can protect against pneumoccal disease) as indicated by the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for one resident (Resident #61), who gave consent to receive the vaccine upon his/her admission to the facility, in a review of 34 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy for Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations, revised 3/18/22, showed the resident or their legal representative will be told the pneumococcal immunization will be offered upon admission and a second pneumococcal immunization may be recommended after five years from the first immunization. The pneumococcal immunization will not be given if the immunization is medically contraindicated, the facility has evidence to support the resident received the immunization, or the resident or their legal representative has refused the immunization. Review of the Centers for Disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete entrapment assessments for two residents who had side rails attached to their bed (Residents #32 and #35), in a sample of 34 residents, to ensure the environment remained safe and free of accident hazards. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility Bed Siderails policy, reviewed 6/29/23, showed the following: -To ensure all bed side rails in use have been evaluated for safety; -All residents using any size siderail device on their beds will have a Restraint/Entrapment Assessment completed to determine the restraining, enabling, or hazard effect of the device. This assessment will occur upon initial use, quarterly, and as needed if there is a significant change in the resident's condition; -Using steps 1 and 2 of the Restraint/Entrapment Assessment, each resident using a side rail device will be assessed to determine if the side rail has a restraining affect and/or an enabling effect; -If step 1 of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and respect the rights of two residents (Resident #9 and #13), in a review of 13 sampled residents. The facility implemented a procedure that infringed on Resident #13's rights and required he/she sign out against medical advice when he/she left the facility to attend church. Resident #13 was his/her own responsible party. The staff locked the facility when the resident left for church services, searched the resident for alcohol upon his/her return, and threatened to involve law enforcement and deny readmission to the facility if the staff detected alcohol or if the resident appeared impaired. The facility then prohibited the resident from attending church services outside the facility. The facility also failed to allow one resident (Resident #9) the right to have reasonable access to the use of a telephone by restricting the resident from using the telephone until after he/she took a shower. The facility census was 111. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to comply with State law when the facility allowed the transportation coordinator and dietary/transportation staff A to transport residents without a current qualified Class E driver's license ( a license required to transport residents for compensation). The facility census was 111. Review of the Missouri Department of Revenue, Driver's License Classes, 12 CSR 10-24.200 (5), dated 7/31/23, showed the following: -Class E: The holder of a Class E license may drive all vehicles which may be driven by a holder of a Class F license and receive compensation in wages, salary, commission, or fare to transport persons or property; -As an owner or employee carrying passengers or property for hire; -Or occasionally operating the commercial motor vehicle of another person in the course of, or as an incident to, their employment. During an interview on 11/1/23 at 1:30 P.M., the administrator said the following: -The facility did not have a current transportation policy; -He thought all of the transportation staff had a class E driver's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled, dated and covered; failed to ensure floors were clean and free of debris; failed to ensure the can opener blade was free of debris; failed to ensure staff wore hair restraints in the kitchen; and failed to ensure staff member's personal items and beverages were not stored in food preparation areas. The facility census was 108. Review of the undated facility policy, Personal Hygiene, showed the following: -These are the guidelines for personal hygiene to promote a safe and sanitary department; -Hair must be covered with a hairnet; -Beards or any excessive body hair that may be exposed must be covered. Review of the undated facility policy, Food Storage, showed the following: -Food items will be stored, thawed and prepared in accordance with good sanitary practice; -Procedure: All products shall be dated upon receipt or when they are prepared. Use Date shall be marked on all food containers according to the timetable in the Dry, Refrigerated and Freezer Storage Chart found in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Residents #3, #4, #12,and #109), in a review of 31 sampled residents, and one additional resident (Resident #49), were treated in a manner to maintain dignity and respect. The facility census was 108. Review of the facility policy, Dignity and Respect, revised on 7/9/21, showed the following: -Every resident has a right to be treated with dignity and respect; -All staff will speak to and treat all residents with dignity and respect. 1. Review of Resident #3's care plan, revised 4/24/22, showed the following: -The resident has impaired cognitive function related to head injury; -He/She is able to adequately express wants and needs; -The resident has manifestations of behaviors related to his/her mental illness that may create disturbances that affect others. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, dated 4/29/22, showed the following: -Diagnoses include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to create an environment that was respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about aspects of their lives that were significant to the resident when the facility did not allow the residents to choose what time and how often they bathed, if they could attend activities, and when they could get up out of bed for four residents (Resident #60, #70, #96, and #110), in a review of 31 residents. The facility census was 108. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, revised on 4/29/21, showed the following: -Purpose: to ensure that resident rights are protected; -Residents have a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. The facility must protect and promote the rights of each resident; -The resident has the right to reside and receive services with reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences, except when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable environment by failing to ensure residents' rooms and living spaces were clean and in good repair. The facility census was 108. Observations on 05/16/22 between 9:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. and on 05/17/22 between 8:30 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. showed the following: -In resident room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom wall was missing three 12-inch wall tiles, exposing raw sheet rock. The bathroom floor was stained with a brown sticky substance. The bathroom floor had cracks around all the tile next to the wall with dark brown substance in the cracks, areas of missing caulk on the floor, and bathroom ceiling was discolored. The floors in the room were dirty with brown particles on three floor tiles under the foot of his/her bed, three quarter-sized dried brown spots of the floor under the sink, particles of debris over the entire floor, -In the shared bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor tiles were discolored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin (medication used to treat diabetes) vials/pens for four residents (Residents #10, #48, #78, and #85) were dated when opened and/or discarded within the designated time frame after opening. The facility census was 108. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, revised 9/17/21, showed all medications except for pre-packaged bubble cards or pre-packaged unit dose medications shall be dated by the Registered Nurse (RN)/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Certified Medication Technician (CMT)/Certified Medication Aide (CMA) when opened. This includes but is not limited to all liquid medications, nasal sprays, inhalers, insulins and all vials. Review of the Food and Drug Administration guidelines for Novolog (insulin), Levemir (insulin) and Lantus (insulin) showed the following: -Novolog Insulin should be discarded 28 days after opening; -Lantus Solostar pens should be discarded 28 days after opening; -Levemir pens should be discarded 42 days after opening. Observation of the Unit 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the menu by not preparing or serving all food items for lunch as directed by the spreadsheet menu on 5/16/22 and 5/17/22. The facility also failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet received proper portion sizes of protein on 5/16/22, and residents on a regular and mechanical soft diet received proper portion sizes of dessert for lunch on 5/16/22 and 5/17/22. The facility census was 108. Review of the undated facility policy, Diets Available in the Facility, showed the facility will provide each resident with a regular or therapeutic diet, as ordered by the physician, in order to ensure that each resident receives the diet prescribed by the physician. Review of the undated facility policy, Therapeutic Diets, showed the following: -Therapeutic diets are prepared and served as prescribed by the attending physician; -Therapeutic diets are planned, prepared and served with supervision or consultation from a registered dietitian; -Therapeutic diets are reflected on the menu extension…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reasonable accommodation of needs for one resident (Resident #28), in a review of 31 sampled residents, by ensuring the resident had a shoes to wear when inside and outside the facility. The facility census was 108. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, revised on 4/29/21, showed the resident has the right to reside and receive services with reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences, except when the health or safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. Review of Resident #28's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, dated 5/2/22, showed the following: -His/Her cognition was intact; -His/Her diagnoses included diabetes (elevated blood sugar levels); -He/She was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs); -He/She walked independently; -It was very important to him/her to choose what clothes to wear. During an interview on 5/17/22 at 9:34 A.M., the resident said he/she did not have any shoes. The pair of shoes in his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, required to be completed by facility staff, for one resident (Residents #3), in a review of 31 sampled residents. This assessment should have been completed within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, there had been a significant change (major decline or improvement in the resident's status) in the resident's physical or mental condition which had an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status and required interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. The facility census was 108. Review of the facility policy, Significant Change, revised 2/26/21, showed the following: -Purpose: The facility will identify within 14 days a significant change in two or more areas of decline or improvement in the resident's physical or mental condition; -If the resident shows a decline or improvement in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a stop date or document clinical justification for continued use of a psychotropic as needed (PRN) medications beyond 14 days for one resident (Resident #21), and failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) on psychotropic medication or document a clinical justification to continue current dosage for one resident (Resident #106), in a review of 31 sampled residents. The facility census was 108. Review of the facility policy, PRN Antipsychotic and Psychotropic Medication, dated last revised 2/26/21, showed the following: -PRN psychotropic medication may be extended longer than 14 days with physician documentation explaining why the prescribing physician believes it to be appropriate to extend the time. -Residents who use antipsychotic medications will receive GDR and behavior intervention, unless clinically contraindication, in an effort to discontinue these medications. -If GDR is not desired by the physician, they must document reasoning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were prepared and served at the proper consistency for residents, including Resident #106, had who physician's orders for a pureed therapeutic diet. The facility census was 108. Review of the undated facility policy, Therapeutic Diets, showed the following: -Therapeutic diets are prepared and served as prescribed by the attending physician; -Therapeutic diets are planned, prepared and served with supervision or consultation from a registered dietitian; -The dietitian and dietary manager must see that: Each food item, served separately in the regular diet, is pureed and served separately for the pureed diet according to the pureed recipes; each dietary staff member involved with serving must refer to and follow the therapeutic diet on the daily menu. Review of the Diet Roster-By Diet, dated 5/16/22, showed seven residents had a physician's order for a pureed diet. Observation on 5/16/22 between 11:50 A.M. and 12:23 P.M. during the lunch meal service, showed residents on a pureed diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-03-08 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey and complaint investigations in a place readily accessible to all residents, family members and legal representatives. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights, dated 7/5/23, showed the resident has the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by federal or state surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. The results must be made available by the facility in a place readily accessible to residents and the facility must post a notice of their availability. 1. During the resident council meeting on 3/6/24 at 1:00 P.M., the residents said they were not aware they could see the results of the annual inspections/surveys or any complaint investigations. They did not know where the book with the results was kept. Observations on 3/5/24 at 9:00 A.M., 3/6/24 at 8:30 A.M., 3/7/24 at 10:15 A.M., in the front foyer/common area of the facility, showed no survey results…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post survey results and plans of correction in locations within the facility accessible to all residents to view. The residents located on the locked/secured unit (identified as Unit 2) did not have access to the survey results. The facility census was 108. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, revised on 4/29/21, showed the resident has the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. The results must be made available by the facility in a place readily accessible to resident and the facility must post a notice of their availability.Observation throughout the survey, 5/16/22 through 5/19/22, showed the only facility survey results accessible to residents were located in the front entrance room on a cabinet in a binder. Observation from 5/16/22 through 5/19/22, on the Unit 2, showed no survey results were posted or accessible to residents. During an interview on 5/17/22 at 10:45 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-05-19 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer to the hospital and the reason for the transfer for six residents (Residents #21, #27, #28, #33, #72, and #101 ), in a review of 31 sampled residents. The facility census was 108. 1. Review of Resident #101's face sheet showed the resident had a durable power of attorney (DPOA) who was responsible for making healthcare decisions. Review of the resident's progress notes showed he/she was transferred to the hospital for evaluation and treatment of a medical condition on 11/29/21, 4/14/22, and 5/10/22. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation the facility provided written notification of the resident's transfer to the hospital to the resident and/or the resident's representative following the transfers on 11/29/21, 4/14/22 and 5/10/22. 2. Review of Resident #27's face sheet showed the resident was his/her own responsible party. Review of resident's progress notes showed he/she was transferred to the hospital for evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-05-19 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold with required information to the resident and/or resident representative when the facility initiated a transfer to the hospital for six residents (Residents #21, #27, #28, #33, #72, and #101), in a review of 31 sampled residents. The facility census was 108. 1. Review of Resident #21's face sheet showed the resident had a legal guardian. Review of the resident's nurses notes, dated 2/10/22, showed he/she was transferred and admitted to the hospital for treatment of a medical condition on 2/10/22. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence the resident and/or resident representative was informed in writing of the facility's bed hold agreement at the time of transfer that included: -The duration of the state bed-hold policy, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility; -The reserve bed payment policy; -The nursing facility's policies regarding bed-hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$198,116 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $71,814 — penalty dated 2026-04-30
  • $15,940 — penalty dated 2026-03-12
  • $31,565 — penalty dated 2025-11-24
  • $24,668 — penalty dated 2024-09-04
  • $28,925 — penalty dated 2024-03-08
  • $25,204 — penalty dated 2023-11-01
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-01 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bernard Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Bridgewood Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Brookfield Health Care CenterBrookfield, MO 1 of 5Brunswick Health Care CenterBrunswick, MO 1 of 5Carrie Elligson Gietner Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Cassville Health Care CenterCassville, MO 1 of 5Crestwood Health Care CenterFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Eastview Manor Care CenterTrenton, MO 1 of 5Edgewood Manor Health Care CenterRaytown, MO 1 of 5Fair View Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Four Seasons Living CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Grand Manor Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Gregory Ridge Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Heritage Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Hidden Lake Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Holton Health Care CenterHolton, KS 1 of 5Legendary Health Care CenterMarshall, MO 1 of 5Milan Health Care CenterMilan, MO 1 of 5Nathan Richard Health Care CenterNevada, MO 1 of 5Nick's Health Care CenterPlattsburg, MO 1 of 5North Village ParkMoberly, MO 1 of 5Odessa Health Care CenterOdessa, MO 1 of 5Parkway Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Rest Haven Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Sarcoxie Health Care CenterSarcoxie, MO 1 of 5South County Health Care CenterArnold, MO 1 of 5Wellsville Health Care CenterWellsville, MO 1 of 5Westview Nursing HomeCenter, MO 2 of 5St Elizabeth Care CenterSaint Elizabeth, MO 2 of 5Stonecrest HealthcareViburnum, MO 3 of 5Greenville Health Care CenterGreenville, MO 3 of 5Portageville Health Care CenterPortageville, MONot rated (Special Focus)Hillside Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
RC TIER PROPERTIES, L.L.C.OrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/28/2018
RCG INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/1994
RELIANT CARE GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/28/2018
RICHARD J. DESTEFANE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2018
DESTEFANE, RICHARDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2018
RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2025
ARSHAD, ABDULLAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/15/2024
MUSTAPHA, SARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/10/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$847K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 96%Medicare 1%Other / private 3%

About 96% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $847K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$165per resident / day
operating cost
$5,023per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$182per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265526. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next