No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Eastview Manor Care Center

1622 East 28th Street, Trenton, MO 64683 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (660) 359-2251 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0741)5 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$163,472 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent Feb 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (106) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $163,472 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-18)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3300 E 10th St · (660) 359-3939 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1903 E 9th St · (660) 359-5700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hy-Vee1.0 mi
1617 E 9th St · (660) 359-2278 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2711 Meadowlark Ln · (660) 359-6816

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.2%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms53.7%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.7%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication43.6%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.8%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.1%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table67.6%23.5%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine9.5%63.5%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.452.111.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.492.331.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.05U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 8.4–17.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.741.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.22
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.36
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
48.1%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 82.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.23 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-18)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

106 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 88 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect three residents (Resident #29, #30, and #33) from physical abuse when Resident #1 strangled and punched Resident #30 in the face to the extent hospitalization was required; strangled and punched Resident #33 in the face resulting in medical evaluation at the local hospital; and took Resident #29's walker away and shoved the resident in the face, causing a fall that required the resident to have an x-ray for a large abrasion sustained to his/her left knee. The facility census was 81. The Administrator was notified on 04/18/2024 at 5:05 PM of the past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 03/21/2025. The facility administration immediately separated and protected the residents from further abuse by Resident #1. Resident #1, #30, and #33 were sent to the hospital for medical assessment and treatment, staff updated each residents plan of care, and all residents were offered counseling from the mental health provider. When Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policies to notify the physician and obtain physician orders when pressure ulcers were found, continue to conduct and document assessments of the wounds, and notify the physician of accurate descriptions and deterioration of the wounds for one resident (Residents #1) who developed a large unstageable pressure ulcer. Additionally, the facility failed to notify the physician and obtain orders for an open area over the bony prominence of one resident's (Resident #2) coccyx and conduct and document assessments of the resident's wound per policy. The facility census was 84. The Administrator was notified on 10/25/24 at 5:54 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 10/02/24. The IJ was removed on 10/31/24 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's undated Wound Treatment Management Policy showed: -The purpose of the policy is to promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent an accident for one resident (Resident #1), when on [DATE] staff transferred the resident into a transport wheelchair (a wheelchair designed for short-term use) and left the resident unsupervised. Approximately ten minutes later, the resident was found face down on the floor in a pool of blood with his/her bottom sitting on his/her feet and forehead against the floor. The resident was sent to the hospital, sustained bleeding in his/her brain and was placed on end of life care on [DATE]. The resident passed away while at the hospital on [DATE]. In addition, the facility failed to keep resident's safe when, on [DATE], the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) used toilet bowl cleaner to clean a stain on the floor of the beauty shop, causing a chemical reaction, resulting a smoky haze in the facility and setting off the fire alarm. The facility census was 84. The Administrator was notified on [DATE] at 6:55 P.M. of an Immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect two residents (Resident #3 and Resident #5) that reside on the secure unit from abuse by Resident #1. Residents #3 and #5 were hit in the head by Resident #1. Resident #2 said residents feel they have to walk on eggshells on the unit, because they do not know when Resident #1, will become upset and lash out verbally or physically. Resident #2 stated he/she feels staff are unable to protect others from Resident #1. Resident #3 said he/she does not feel safe in the facility due to Resident #1's verbal and physical abuse to him/her and the other residents. Resident #4 said he/she does not feel safe because the other residents on the secure unit have too many behaviors and do whatever they want on the unit. Resident #5 said he/she does not feel safe as he/she has gotten beaten up, had multiple physical altercations with Resident #1, and is scared of Resident #1. Resident #5 said Resident #1 has hit him/her in the face and also slammed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-19 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate education and ensure staff were competent to provide care and protection to residents with mental and behavioral health diagnoses, when Resident #1, who resided on the secured special care unit, had multiple physical altercations with other residents, causing physical injury and emotional distress to other residents. Additionally, Resident #6 engaged in self-harming behaviors, causing lacerations to his/her forearms and upper legs. Staff were unaware of non-pharmacological interventions, individual care plan interventions, and were unable to provide appropriate protection, as no education was provided to them prior to assignment on the special care unit for behavioral health. The facility failed to ensure a process was in place to ensure employees had the knowledge and training necessary to support individuals with a history of trauma and behavioral health diagnoses. The facility census was 87. The Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to address the behavioral health needs of two residents (Resident #1 and #6) to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. This is evidenced by Resident #1, who requires behavioral health support needs and has a history of physically abusive behaviors, abusing two residents (Residents #3 and #5) on the secure care community, as a result of the facility failure to assess and implement appropriate interventions to address their behavioral health needs. Additionally, Resident #6 displayed self-harming behaviors and the facility failed to assess behavioral support needs and implement appropriate interventions to address the self-harming behaviors and ensure their safety. The facility also failed to ensure one resident (Resident #6) received care planned support and supervision during medication administration by failing to crush the residents medications and checking the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess, contact the physician, and treat timely one sampled resident (Resident #64) when he/she voiced complaints of being in pain from constipation and reported seeing blood when trying to have a bowel movement. The facility census was 83. 1. Review of Resident #64's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 3/18/21, included the following: - Date admitted [DATE]; - Cognitively intact; - Independent with toilet use; - Constipation section was not completed. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/4/21, did not show any information regarding a history of constipation. Review of the resident's May 2021 Physician Order Sheet included the following order: - Check for fecal impaction and remove as needed, order date 2/16/21; - There were no orders for treating constipation. Review of the resident's medical records showed the following: - Nurses' note, dated 5/5/21 by Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess and document, accurately and timely, a sacral pressure ulcer (PU), when the ulcer was first identified as a Stage 3 PU (Stage 3 is a full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous (the tissue between the fat layer just under the skin and over the top of the muscles) fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed. Slough (dead tissue) may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining (when the tissue under the wound edges becomes eroded, resulting in a a pocket beneath the skin at the wound's edge) and tunneling (channels that extend from a wound into and through subcutaneous tissue or muscle)and failed to follow physician's orders for treatment of sacral ulcer and right heel ulceration for one resident (Resident #7) of 22 sampled residents . The facility census was 82. Review of Pressure Ulcer Policy, dated 4/6/2017, showed: -The purpose of this policy is to provice a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were allowed to exercise their right to make personal choices regarding their dietary preferences when facility staff limited residents to a maximum of two packets of each condiment per meal and depleted inventory of cold cereal, brown sugar and cottage cheese. This affected three out of the six sampled residents. The facility census was 80.Review of facilities policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity dated 09/21/25 showed the resident's personal choices will be considered when providing services to meet the resident's needs and preferences. Review of facility's policy titled Resident's Rights dated 09/21/25 showed residents had the right receive services with reasonable accommodations of individual preferences. Review of facility's Cost Accounting in Dietary Department policy dated 07/05/23 showed the facility was to have seven days of staples inventory on hand under normal operating procedures. 1. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-27 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two residents were treated with dignity and respect when the facility allowed staff to speak to cognitively impaired residents with disrespectful tone. This affected two residents (Resident #4 and #5) out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 80.Review of facility's Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity policy, dated 09/21/25 showed:-All staff should treat residents with dignity and respect.-Staff should speak respectfully to residents. 1. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly minimum data set (MDS), A federally mandated assessment tool completed by staff, dated 04/12/26 showed:-Not Cognitively intact;-Diagnoses included: Traumatic brain injury, dementia, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, profound intellectual disabilities. Review of care plan dated 04/09/26 showed: -He/She had negative behaviors including being verbally aggressive with staff and peers when upset.-At risk for impaired nutrition.-Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow facility policy and ensure the residents physician was verbally notified on 01/21/2026 of a resident fall with a head injury and on 1/24/2026 when staff found the resident unresponsive for about a minute and with seizure like activity for about 45 seconds before becoming responsive again. The staff notified the residents physician on 01/25/26 at 12P.M., approximately 16 hours after the change in condition occurred. The facility census was 82.Review of the facility policy titled Notification of Changes, dated 05/14/24, showed:- The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification.- Circumstances requiring notification included accidents resulting in injury and accidents with the potential to require physician intervention.Review of the facility policy titled Incidents and Accidents, dated 5/18/24, showed:- Accidents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's right, (Resident #4), to be free from abuse when Resident #3 hit Resident #4 on the left side of his/her ear. This affected one of the four sampled residents, (Resident #4). The facility census was 84. On 2/6/26 the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance that began on 02/02/26. The facility administration immediately conducted aninvestigation and corrective actions were implemented that included in-service for all staff regarding abuse prevention, incidents and accidents and behavioral monitoring. The noncompliance was corrected on 02/04/2026.Review of the facility's policy for Abuse and Neglect, revised 6/12/24 showed:It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other agencies in accordance with current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment was maintained in the secured unit when staff did not maintain one of two-unit showers observed to have a slimy black-mold like substance, did not ensure showers/tubs were cleaned between residents, did not repair the ceiling is need of repair, and did not maintain an effective pest-control system. This affected three of four sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3) The facility census was 81. Review of the facility's undated admission Packet showed basic covered services for all residents includes housekeeping and maintenance services.Review of the facility's Safe and Homelike Environment policy, dated June 2024, showed:- In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment;- Environment refers to any environment in the facility that is frequented by the residents;- Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one sampled resident to return to the facility when he/she did not meet criteria for hospitalization. Between 7/31/25 -8/1/2025 the resident was transported 5 times between 2 hospitals and the facility and on 8/1/25 was left stranded at the hospital with no clothes, money or personal belongings. The resident was without long-term care placement for approximately 9 days when he/she exhibited behaviors, requiring hospital staff to utilize restraints and admit the resident for psychiatric care. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's Resident Transfer/Discharge/Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave Policy, dated 4/28/25., included: Residents who are sent emergently to the hospital are considered transfers because the residents return is generally expected. Residents who are sent to the emergency room must be permitted to return to the facility, unless the resident meets one of the criteria under which the facility can initiate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide timely an appropriate discharge when staff failed to provide written notice of discharge that included the date and location the resident would be discharge to, statement of appeal rights and the name, address, or telephone number of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (advocates for the residents in nursing facilities). The facility's census was 85.Review of the facility's Resident Transfer/Discharge/Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave Policy, dated 4/28/25., showed:-Notice of discharge or transfer must notify the resident and the resident's representative of the reason for discharge in a writing and must notify a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman at least 30 days in advance of the discharge or as soon as possible. -If an emergency or immediate discharge copies shall be sent to the Ombudsman. The written notices shall include the reason for the transfer or discharge, the date of the discharge of transfer. The resident's right to appeal their discharge. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #1) from physical abuse when another resident (Resident #2) grabbed Resident #1 by the back of the shirt and hair, causing Resident #1 to lose his/her balance and fall to the ground. Resident #2 then made closed hand contact with Resident #1's face. The facility's census was 81. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 6/12/24, showed: -It is the policy of the this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies with current state and federal regulations within prescribed time frames; -Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #56's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Upper and lower body impairment on one side of the body; -Dependent on staff for toileting; -Diagnoses included: Stroke, diabetes, and depression. Review of the resident's care plan dated 02/27/25, showed: -ADL self-care deficit related to stroke; -Used a wheelchair; -Required assistance of two staff for ADLs; Observation on 04/01/25 at 09:49 A.M., showed: -The resident asleep, in a wheelchair, seated at a table in the dining room; -The resident was not wearing pants; -The resident's bare legs were exposed thigh down to his/her feet, because the resident's blanket was not pulled up; -NA J walked past the resident and did not cover up the resident's exposed areas. Other staff walked by and other residents were seated in the dining room. -The ADON walked by the resident and did cover up the resident's exposed legs During an interview on 04/01/25 at 10:04 A.M., NA J said: -Being uncovered in the dining room is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct pre-employment screenings per facility policy. The facility failed to check the certified nurse aide (CNA) registry prior to employment to ensure all newly hired employees did not have a Federal Indicator (marker given to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect), and the facility was unable to show they had completed a criminal background check (CBC) or employee disqualification list (EDL) check prior to employment. This affected 7 out of 7 sampled employees hired since March 2024. The facility census was 81. Review of the facility's hiring policy, undated, showed all applicants, employees, volunteers and vendors will have a pre-employment screening completed and will include a Criminal Background Check (CBC), Employee Disqualification Check (EDL), Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Registry, Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR), and verification of licensure. Review of randomly selected new employee hire records for March 2024 through March 2025., showed the facility did not have documentation available to show…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 88 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident and resident representative, if applicable, was involved in developing the care plan and making decisions about his or her care. This affected 3 out of 18 sampled residents (Resident #9, #47, and #59). The facility census was 81. Review of the Facility's Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, revised 10/31/2024, showed: The purpose of a care plan is to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident's rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan will be prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that includes, but is not limited to: A. The attending physician or non-physician practitioner designee involved in the resident's care, if the physician is unable to participate in the development of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff failed to ensure they provided perineal care at least every two hours for three residents (Resident #56, #8, and #59), The facility census was 81. The facility did not provide the requested policy on ADLs. Review of the facility policy Perineal Care, dated 06/29/23, showed: -Ensure residents' perineal area is kept clean to prevent skin breakdown, odor, and infection; -Perineal care is very important to maintaining the comfort of residents; -More frequent care is required for residents who are incontinent and for those who have an indwelling catheter. 1. Review of Resident #56's care plan dated 02/27/24, showed: -ADL self-care deficit related to stroke; -Used a wheelchair; -Required assistance of two staff for ADLs. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide a program of meaningful activities in accordance with the resident's preferences for six residents (Resident #59, #47, #48, #78, #43, and #29) of 18 residents. The facility census was 81. The facility Therapeutic Activities policy and scheduled activity calendar was requested and neither were provided. 1. Review of Resident's #59's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/24/24, showed the activity section of the MDS was not completed. Review of Resident #59's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Cognition severely impaired. -Dependent in all activities of daily living (ADLs). -Diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus and stroke. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 07/11/2024, showed: -Limited physical mobility. -Unable to communicate needs. -Encourage resident to become engaged in facility life through group activities, meals in dining rooms, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident: when there was minimal oversight by nursing staff on the secured unit resulting in resident to resident abuse, when one resident (Resident #1) physically assaulted three residents (Resident #30, #33, and #29); the facility failed to ensure the facility had enough staff to provide perineal care at least every two hours to dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) for three residents (Resident #56, #8, and #59); and when the facility failed to have enough staff to maintain the dining room in a clean and sanitary manner, as well as provide adequate housekeeping and laundry services to meet the needs of the facility and residents. This affected seven of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 81. Review of the facility's Sufficient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four nurse aides currently working and providing direct resident care met the minimum qualifications, which included satisfactory participation in a state-approved nurse aide training and competency evaluation program within four months of hire. The facility census was 81. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nurse Aide (NA) Qualifications and Training Requirements, revised May, 2019, showed: - Nurse Aides must undergo a state-approved training program; - In keeping with the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA), our facility will only employ those nurse aides who meet the requirements set forth in the federal and state statutes concerning the staffing of long-term care facilities; - Our facility will not employ any individual as a nurse aide for more than four months full-time, temporary, per diem, or otherwise, unless: that individual is competent to provide designated nursing care and nursing related services; and that individual has completed a training program and competency evaluation program, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control policy and procedures when the facility did not complete initial TB skin test procedures (Tuberculosis Testing-A skin test to check for active Tuberculosis- a serious bacterial respiratory infection that is highly transmissible) on newly hired employees, failed to read the TB skin test, and failed to document the results in the employee record or facility TB test book. This affected eight newly hired employees from March of 2024 through March of 2025. The facility census was 81. Review of the facility's Tuberculosis Testing policy, dated 4/28/23, showed: upon hire, a new employee will receive a 2 step TB skin test to ensure any possible TB infection can be proactively managed to prevent further spread. If a new hire has had a positive reaction to a TB skin test in the past a chest x-ray will be obtained. All TB skin test and chest X-rays will be kept on file in the employee record. Review of Employee TB Records showed: - Current employee Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) K: hire date 7/24/24, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three residents (Resident #38, #43, and #50). This affected three of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 81. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, dated 10/31/24, showed: - The facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. - The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care. - The care plan will describe, at a minimum, the services that are furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy, dated 05/18/24, showed: - The resident's care plan shall identify the interventions for oxygen therapy, based upon the resident's assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order and care plan for hospice services for one sampled resident (Resident #8). The facility census was 81 residents. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, dated 10/31/24, showed: - The facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. - The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care. - The care plan will describe, at a minimum, the services that are furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 1. Review of the Resident#8's Quarterly (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 01/31/25, showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Dependent with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs); -Frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnoses included: Cancer, depression and schizophrenia (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse when four residents were involved in physical altercations (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4). The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical abuse on [DATE] at 12:44 P.M. when Resident #2 open handedly applied for to Resident #1's shoulders causing resident to loose balance and land on bottom. The facility also failed to protect Resident #3 from physical abuse on [DATE] at 5:04 P.M. when Resident #4 open handedly applied force to Resident #3's chest resulting in resident #3 loosing balance and falling to the ground. The facility's census was 83. On [DATE] the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which began on [DATE]. The facility administration immediately conducted an investigation and corrective actions were implemented. The noncompliance was corrected on [DATE]. Review of facility policy, abuse and neglect, revised [DATE], showed: -Abuse is the willful infliction of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for one out of three residents (Resident #1) with behavioral health needs, including verbal aggression toward residents and staff, threatening other residents, physical altercations, and throwing objects. On 11/2/24 , the resident required one on one supervision after an incident of aggression. The resident was removed from one-on-one supervision, without input of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) on 11/4/24, and placed on 15 minute checks. No other interventions were put into place and on 11/9/24 the resident had another aggressive outburst- striking another resident. The facility census was 82 Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 11/15/24, showed: -The facility had the ability to treat Psychiatric/Mood Disorders such as psychosis (a collection of symptoms that can affect the mind, causing a person to lose touch with reality) hallucinations (seeing, hearing, feeling, tasting, or smelling things that aren't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party or physician of a change in condition for four residents (Residents #1, #3, #4, and #5). The facility census was 84. Review of the facility Notification of Changes policy, dated 2023, showed: -The purpose of the policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician and notifies, consistent with his/her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. -The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member/legal representative when there is a change requiring notification, such as: --Accidents resulting in injury or have the potential to require physician intervention; --Significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status; --Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the wound nurse had the appropriate competency and skill set, when one resident's (Resident #1) wound was not appropriately identified, assessed, and treated. The facility census was 84. The facility did not provide a job description or requirements for the Wound Nurse (WN). Review of the facility's undated Wound Treatment Management Policy showed: -The purpose of the policy is to promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders. 1. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change. 2. In the absence of treatment orders, the licensed nurse will notify the physician to obtain treatment orders. This may be the treatment nurse or the assigned licensed nurse. 7. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record or in the electronic health record. 8. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled nurse aides (NA) were enrolled in a state-approved training and competency evaluation program and completed a nurse aide training program within four months of his/her employment in the facility. The census was 84. The facility did not provide a policy on education and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) training. The facility did not provide a policy for the Hall Monitor position. Review of the facility's Hall Monitor Job Description, dated 9/17/24, showed: -The Hall Monitor position is a way to ensure there is extra support within the facility to help assist with non-nursing duties. -Duties: Walking rounds, intensive monitoring (frequent checks and 1:1 monitoring, assisting with smoking breaks for residents, cleaning of facility/resident equipment, assist with transportation of residents throughout the unit, facility or outings that do not require hands on care, and assist with activities. -Items the Hall Monitor may not assist with on their assigned units include: Direct patient care, vital signs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow policy and report an injury of unknown origin to the administrator or state survey agency when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A discovered one resident (Resident #1) to have multiple bruises of unknown origin on or about 10/13/2024 on the resident's sides and lower breasts. The facility census was 84. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, dated 9/17/2024, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed timelines. -Injuries of an unknown source includes circumstances when both the following conditions are met: --The source of the injury was not observed by any person or could not be explained by the resident. --The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury, location of the injury,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policy and investigate an injury of unknown origin when staff discovered one resident, (Resident #1) with multiple bruises of unknown origin on the resident's sides and lower breasts. The facility census was 84. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, dated 9/17/2024, showed: -Injuries of an unknown source includes circumstances when both the following conditions are met: The source of the injury was not observed by any person or could not be explained by the resident. The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury, location of the injury, the number of injuries observed at one particular point in time, or the incidence of injuries over time. -Guidelines: The facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for screening and training employees, protection or residents and for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property. The purpose is to assure the the facility is doing all that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Residents #14, #15, #16) were free from misappropriation when a staff member (Hall Monitor A) took their medications. Law enforcement found the medications in Hall Monitor A's possession when they executed a search warrant at his/her home. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, dated 9/17/2024, included: Misappropriation of Resident Property: The deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent, use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent, including resident's medication. The facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for screening and training employees, protection or residents and for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property. The purpose is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve resident abilities to carry out activities of daily living, including dressing, shaving, grooming, and bathing for four of 13 sampled residents (Residents #7, #10, #11, and #13). Each of the residents were assessed and care planned as independent with activities of daily living, however, residents were observed with greasy hair, dirty clothing, body odor, and long, dirty nails.The facility census was 87. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Policy, dated 9/17/24, showed: -The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. -Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care; 2. Transfer and ambulation; 3. Toileting;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living to three of 13 sampled residents (Resident#8, #9, and #12 ), who were unable to perform their own in order to maintain good personal hygiene. Each of the residents were assessed and care planned as dependent on staff for activities of daily living, however, residents were observed with greasy hair, dirty clothing, body odor, and long, dirty nails,and ungroomed facial hair. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Poliy, dated 9/17/24, showed: -The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. -Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care; 2. Transfer and ambulation; 3. Toileting; 4. Eating to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, odor free and comfortable environment. Strong odors of urine and body odor were present, floors in entry way and dining rooms were sticky and had spilled drinks and food on them, and there was evidence of flies and mice. A resident's air conditioner had dark colored mold on it. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility's Nursing Environmental Inspection Policy, dated 9/17/24, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to regularly monitor the nursing services environment to ensure the facility is maintained in a safe and sanitary manner. -1. The Director of Nursing or designee will perform random and/or routine inspections of the nursing environment. These areas of inspection will consist of, but is not limited to: a. Resident Rooms b. Medications rooms and medications carts c. Resident Common Areas d. Clean and Soiled Utility Rooms e. Nurses Stations f. Shower Rooms -2. Environmental inspections should include the cleanliness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #7) had safe and well-maintained assistive devices to prevent accidents. The resident used a manual wheelchair for independent mobility. The wheelchair was not safe and functional. The resident could not lean back in it for fear of falling over due to the back support being worn out. The facility census was 87. The facility did not provide a policy regarding ensuring resident's assistive devices are well maintained and safe. 1. Review of Resident #7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by staff), dated 6/27/24, showed: -The resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), seizures (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by severe, ongoing anxiety that interferes with daily activities), schizophrenia (a chronic brain disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-04 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Refer to Event ID N5TM12 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed exercise reasonable care for the protection of resident's property to prevent loss or theft when staff did not ensure resident property was accounted for, labeled and/or returned to the resident. This impacted six of six surveyed residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #5) The facility census was 88. Review of facility policy, Safe and Homelike Environment Policy, dated 2024, showed: -In accordance with resident's rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the residents to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. - The facility staff should exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft. Review of facility policy, resident rights, dated 2024, showed: -Resident has the right to retain and use personal possessions, including some furnishings, and appropriate clothing, as space permits, unless to do so would infringe upon the rights or health and safety of other residents. -Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Refer to event ID N5TM12 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene when showers were not provided twice a week which affected four residents (Resident #1, #2, #5, and #6) of six sampled residents. The facility census was 88. Review of facility policy, activities of daily living (ADL), dated 2024, showed: -The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLS do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. -Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care -A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal, and oral hygiene. Review of facility policy, resident's rights, dated 2024, showed resident has the right to a dignified existence. 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to keep a clean kitchen, failed to temperature check foods, failed to maintain foods at a safe holding temperature during food service, failed to store pitchers inverted, failed to keep food preparation surface free from staff personal items, failed to maintain the faucet temperature at a comfortable temperature, and failed to ensure staff washed their hands when contaminated. The facility census was 85. 1. Review of facility policy, food temperatures, dated 2024, showed: -Foods will be served at proper temperature to ensure food safety; -Record reading on food temperature chart form at the beginning of the tray line and during the tray line if temperatures do not meet acceptable serving temperatures, reheat the product or chill the product to proper temperature. Take the temperature of each pan before serving; -If temperatures are not at acceptable levels and cannot be corrected in time for meal service,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed exercise reasonable care for the protection of resident's property to prevent loss or theft when staff did not ensure resident property was accounted for, labeled and/or returned to the resident. This impacted six of six surveyed residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #5) The facility census was 88. Review of facility policy, Safe and Homelike Environment Policy, dated 2024, showed: -In accordance with resident's rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the residents to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. - The facility staff should exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft. Review of facility policy, resident rights, dated 2024, showed: -Resident has the right to retain and use personal possessions, including some furnishings, and appropriate clothing, as space permits, unless to do so would infringe upon the rights or health and safety of other residents. -Resident may retain and use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene when showers were not provided twice a week which affected four residents (Resident #1, #2, #5, and #6) of six sampled residents. The facility census was 88. Review of facility policy, activities of daily living (ADL), dated 2024, showed: -The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLS do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. -Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care -A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal, and oral hygiene. Review of facility policy, resident's rights, dated 2024, showed resident has the right to a dignified existence. 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the staff failed to ensure residents remained free from accident hazards and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents when a dedicated staff member who was responsible for providing one on one supervision to one resident (Resident #1) did not keep resident within eyesight and he/she was able to tie a string around his/her neck while using the bathroom. The facility census was 85. Review of facility policy, accidents and supervision policy, dated 2024, includes the resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Review of facility policy, intensive monitoring, dated 2024, showed: -Residents who require more intensive monitoring due to crisis, behavioral/psychiatric symptoms will be monitored by facility staff. -One on one monitoring a designated employee assigned by a facility supervisor. Residents who require intensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they cared for residents in a dignified manner when staff failed to change a resident's (Resident #44) clothes for four days. The facility also failed to serve all resident's meals in a dignified manner by leaving all meals on meal trays during each observed dining experience. This had the potential to affect all sampled residents. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's Dignity and Respect policy, dated 6/29/23 showed: - The purpose of the policy was to ensure that every resident is treated with dignity and respect; - All staff will speak to and treat all residents with dignity and respect. 1. Review of Resident # 44's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/11/23 showed: - Brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicates intact cognition; - The resident was independent for eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, bathing, upper, and lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to respect the dignity of six sampled residents (Residents #12, Resident #14, Resident #18, Resident #45, Resident #54 and Resident #70) when dietary staff yelled out to the residents in an undignified manner during lunch, and when the staff did not ask the residents if they would like to have their plates removed from the serving tray before eating and when the facilty made the residents set at at assigned tables. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, revised, 7/5//23, showed: -The resident has the right to a dignified exorbitance, self-determination; -The facility must protect and promote rights of each resident. 1. Observation on 2/6/24 at 1:10 P.M., showed: - The residents sat at assigned tables in the dining room on Station 2; - The dietary staff frequently yelled out to various residents, What do you want to drink? or What do you want to eat. - Staff served the residents' plates on trays and did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to create an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives. Facility staff failed to allow non-smoking residents to go outside and get exercise separately from the residents who smoked, which affected three of 18 sampled residents, (Resident #27, Resident #45 and Resident #70) and the facility staff only allowed residents who reside on the secure unit to have three drinks at a meal which affected all 38 residents on the secure unit. The facility census was 83. The facility did not provide a policy for resident's preferences. 1. Review of Resident #70's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/31/23, showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Did not indicate the resident smoked; - Diagnosis included depression. During a group meeting on 2/7/24 at 10:30 A.M., Resident #70 said: - He/she did not smoke; - He/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to act promptly and resolve resident grievances voiced during the resident council meetings. The facility did not maintain documentation of resident concerns, attempts to resolve concerns or follow up actions. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's residents grievance policy, revised 9/25/23, showed, in part: - The facility wants to hear and address any concerns of a resident. A resident or their legal representative can bring concerns to a staff member, the resident concern group, or call the compliance hotline; - Every resident has the right to voice their grievance with the facility or other agency. Grievances could include care and treatment that was not provided, behavior or staff or other residents, or any other concerns regarding their stay; - A grievance is a formal complaint, not a question or concept brought to a staff member or a call to the Compliance Hotline; - No resident shall be retaliated against in any way for voicing a grievance; - The Social Service Director shall serve as the Grievance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a surety bond in an amount to cover any loss of theft to residents money held in the facility resident trust fund account which affected all residents who had money held in their Resident Trust Fund account. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's approved Bond letter dated 9/20/23., included: - The Bond provides coverage in the amount of $75,000.00. The surety bond is required to be in an amount equal to one and one-half times the average monthly balance or average total of the balances, rounded to the nearest one thousand dollars, in the residents' personal funds accounts for the preceding year. Review of the facility's 12 month resident interest bearing trust account on 2/9/24., showed: -[DATE]-ending balance of $45,811.57 -March 2023-ending balance of $67,23.71 -April 2023-ending balance of $46,249.97 -May 2023-ending balance of $57,520.05 -June 2023-ending balance of $57,550.05 -July 2023-ending balance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure the residents had access to a telephone where the residents could make and receive calls in private. This affected three of 18 sampled residents, Residents #42, Resident #53, and Resident #69. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy dated 2024, showed: -The residents have the right to reasonable access to the use of a telephone, where calls can be made without being overheard. 1. Review of Resident #42's admission Record, Face Sheet dated 9/8/23/, showed: - Age-28; - Under Guardianship through [NAME] County Public Administrator Office; - Diagnoses: Schizophrenia (A disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly.), anxiety, depression, history of illegal drug use. Review of Resident #42's revised care plan, dated 11/14/23., showed: - Resident has a guardian but resident is to be included in decision making and care planning. - Staff are to encourage resident to engage in normal life…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable homelike environment when staff failed to properly clean resident room floors, prevent strong odors in resident rooms and halls, clean visible debris from exposed plumbing, replace cracked glass at the end of a resident hall way, maintain and clean flooring in the front dining area, replace and repaint areas of missing paint in resident rooms, ensure all resident lighting fixtures had a globe, and provide a furnished common area on a locked unit. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's Housekeeping- Deep cleaning policy, dated 6/29/23 showed: - The purpose of the policy is to ensure all rooms are clean; - Deep cleaning was to be completed) as scheduled; - Deep cleaning included complete pull-outs of furniture in rooms, wall cleaning, floor cleaning (scrubbing and waxing included), restrooms cleaned and disinfected, cob webs removed, beds and rails cleaned,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0620 — pattern
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the admissions policy did not require residents or potential residents to waive potential facility liability for losses of personal property. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's admission policy showed a section titled Personal Possessions on page 13 which contained the following the facility shall under no circumstances be held responsible for or have any liability of any nature whatsoever for loss or damage to valuables, personal property or money brought to facility. During an interview on 2/9/24 at 5:45 P.M., the Administrator said he was aware the admission agreement contained this stipulation. The Administrator said he did not realize this was related to a regulation.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care when the facility staff failed to obtain and update orders for Prothrombin Time Tests (PT) (a test that measures how long it takes for a clot to form in a blood sample and international normalized ratio (INR) (a type of calculation based on PT test results) checks for a resident receiving Coumadin (Resident #44), obtain clear orders for a resident (Resident #44) receiving Coumadin (a blood thinner), and set up a follow up appointment as prescribed by a nurse practitioner for Resident # 52. This affected 2 of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders policy. Dated 9/20/23 showed: - The purpose of the policy was to outline procedures in accurately transcribing physician's orders and to ensure that all physicians' orders are followed; - The purpose of the policy was to ensure that a process was in place to monitor nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to provide meaningful activities, including religious services and outdoor activities to three sampled residents, Resident #60, Resident 52 and Resident #136, that reside on the Special Care Unit. In addition, 10 of 10 residents in a group meeting reported meaningful activities were not being provided. The facility census was 83. Review of the Activity policy with a revision date of July 19, 2023 includes; - The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all residents in the facility are provided an ongoing program of activities designated to meet, in accordance with comprehensive assessment, their interests and their physical , mental and psychosocial-social well-being. - The activity calendar will be posted at each unit and will include activities that are appropriate for the general therapeutic milieu population that meets the specific needs, cognitive impairments, interests and supports the quality of life while enhancing self- esteem and dignity.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide trauma informed care to three sampled residents (Resident #45, Resident #71 and Resident #83) with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that is triggered by a terrifying event). The facility census was 83. The facility did not provide the requested Trauma Informed Care policy. 1. Review of Resident #45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated [DATE], showed: -No cognitive impairment; -The resident is independent with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs): -Doing things with groups of people is very important to the resident; -Doing favorite activities is very important to the resident; -Diagnoses included, PTSD, Bipolar (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), and anxiety. Review of the resident's care plan dated, [DATE], showed: -The resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication rate of less than five percent (5%). Facility staff made seven medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error resulting in a medication error rate of 28% which affected five of 18 sampled residents, (Resident #19, Resident #30, Resident #31, Resident #54 and Resident #83). The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's policy for medication administration and monitoring, revised 9/20/23, showed, in part: - The purpose is to ensure a process is in place for proper administration of medications, techniques of administering medications, effective monitoring of residents for adverse consequences associated with side effects to medications. To provide guidelines and systems for following procedures for medication errors including defining a medication error and the levels of medication errors; - Medications are to be given per doctors' orders; - It is imperative that all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe and effective medication administration system that was free of significant medication errors when staff failed to prime the insulin pens prior to administering the insulin which affected two residents, (Resident #54 and Resident #83). The facility census was 83 Review of the facility's policy for guidance for using insulin products, dated 2021, showed, in part: - To minimize air bubbles in pen-like devices prime the pen prior to each and every injection by pushing two units into the air until a drop of insulin is seen at the top of the needle. Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for Lantus (long acting) flexpen insulin, revised 2022, showed; - Dial a test dose of two units; -Press the injection button all the way in and check to see that insulin comes out of the needle; -The dial will automatically go back to zero after you perform the test. Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for Novolog (fast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve flavor and appearance when residents were served hamburgers and cheeseburgers that failed to maintain palatable flavor and appetizing appearance. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's Dietary Food Preparation policy, dated 7/5/23 showed: - Standardized recipes will be used for all products prepared; - The cook and/or the dietary manager will taste food prepared before serving; - Foods will be served at proper temperature to insure food safety; - No instructions to ensure food is cooked in a manor to conserve flavor and appearance. 1. Review of Resident # 44's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/11/23 showed: - Brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicates intact cognition; - The resident was independent for eating, oral hygiene, toileting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's Dietary Equipment Operations, Infection Control, and Sanitation Policy, dated 2/2/24 showed: - The dietary staff shall maintain the sanitation of the dietary department through compliance with written, comprehensive cleaning schedules developed for the facility by the dietary manager; - All surfaces and equipment shall be washed with a sanitizing solution; - The dish machine will be cleaned after each meal; - Weekly cleaning of dish machine interior and exterior with de-liming solution; - Sanitation should be completed after each use gas grills, cooking surfaces, and stove tops. Observation on 2/6/24 at 10:00 A.M., showed: - A six pound ten ounce can of golden whole kernel corn dented in dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) met on a quarterly basis and included the appropriate attendees; failed to identify, develop, implement, monitor and evaluate system problems. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's undated Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan showed: - Purpose: to provide quality excellence in resident care and do a root cause analysis for identified areas of concern and improvement; - The QAA committee will review data from areas the facility believes it needs to monitor on a monthly basis to assure systems are being monitored and maintained to achieve the highest level of quality for our organization. - The administrator has responsibility and is accountable to our facility and corporation for ensuring that QAPI is implemented throughout the organization. - All department managers, the administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON), antibiotic steward, the infection control and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection prevention and control practices to help prevent the development the transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to change gloves and failed to sanitize shared medical equipment using acceptable standards of practice effecting two residents (Resident #8 and Resident #13) of the 18 sampled residents, and failed to follow their new employee policy regarding infection control practices and Tuberculosis Screening for eight of the 10 sampled new hires. The facility census was 83. Facility policy regarding Handwashing, dated 6/29/23, showed: -Purpose: To provide guidelines to employees for proper and appropriate handwashing techniques that will aid in the prevention of the transmission of infection. Handwashing is indicated and should be performed when: -Whenever hands are visibly soiled. -Before performing invasive procedures. -After having prolonged contact with a resident. -After handling used dressings, specimen containers, contaminated tissues, linens, etc.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the proper care to maintain good personal hygiene when facility staff did not provide complete and thorough perineal care, as well as provide fingernail hygiene. This affected one resident (Resident #8) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 83. The facility did not provide a policy for ADL care for the dependent resident. 1. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 1/13/24, showed: -Dependent on staff for personal hygiene, transfers, dressing and eating. -Incontinent of bladder. -Colostomy (a surgical operation in which a piece of the colon is diverted to an artificial opening in the abdomen to bypass a damaged part of the colon). -Diagnoses included: Multiple Sclerosis (a chronic, typically progressive disease involving damage to the sheaths of the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, whose symptoms may include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of pressure ulcers, failed to identify pressure ulcers, as well as address risk factors for the development of pressure ulcers and failed to provide interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #8) of the five sampled residents. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility Pressure Ulcer Policy, dated 6/29/23 showed: A pressure ulcer is defined as an area of skin breakdown that develops when the skin and sort tissue is squeezed between the bones and the surface that is within contact of the body. This process reduces the flow of blood to the area and causes the area to lose necessary blood and oxygen vital for the body tissue to thrive. -The most common area for pressure ulcers to develop are boney prominences (bones close to the skin), which can include the hip, heel, buttocks, elbow, shoulder and the back of the head. Several factors that can increase the risk for pressure ulcers are: -Being bedridden or confined to a wheelchair for long periods of time.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess pain and failed to provide pain management in accordance with the resident's physician orders for one resident (#13) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's Pain Management policy, reviewed 7/5/22, showed: Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all residents who are receiving routine scheduled pain medication or PRN (as needed) pain medication on a frequent basis have their pain evaluated and assessed prior to pain medication and within one hour after the medication was given to determine if the current pain medication regimen is effective to adequately manage the resident's acceptable pain level. Procedure- When dispensing any scheduled routine or PRN pain medication, the Certified/Licensed/Registered Nursing staff administering the pain medication must do the following: Assess the resident, Determine the location and intensity of the pain. Pain should by rated on a 0-10 scale. 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable, Mild pain:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility staff failed to provide wound care to one resident (Resident #1) for approximately three days after the facility staff identified the resident had wounds that required wound care. The resident developed an infection in his/her wound and required hospitalization and antibiotics. The deficient practice affected one of two sampled residents. The facility census was 84. Review of the wound management policy dated 4/9/21 showed: - The purpose of this policy to to ensure all wounds are being monitored and treated by the physician or wound care consultant. - Wound care treatments will be completed per physician's orders. - The nurse or designee will review the treatment orders and notify the physician or wound care consultant as needed for changes. Review of the admission process policy dated 12/1/22 showed: - The purpose of the policy in part is to, ensure the admission process provided continuity of resident care and that the facility is able to meet the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for all residents of the facility, when staff did not keep rooms clean, floors throughout the building clean and in good repair, left dead mice in an empty cabinet on Station 2, shower rooms dirty with mold-like substances on the floors and walls, doors and walls in all the hallways and in resident rooms scuffed with missing paint, missing closet doors, cabinet drawers that did not close, failed to remove a dead and decaying bird from the main entrance walkway into the facility where visitors and residents entered and exited the building, and an overall uncleanliness about the building which affected all of the facility's five residence halls, all common areas of the facility and outside around the entire building. The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy regarding housekeeping or their daily cleaning check list. Review of the facility's pest Summary of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed keep a clean kitchen, failed to label food when it was opened, failed ensure each refrigerator and freezer had working thermometers and failed to ensure staff washed their hands as often as necessary. The facility also failed to ensure foods were refrigerated according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility policy titled Dietary- Sanitary Procedures, dated 10/23/29, included the following: - Hand Washing and Glove Use: Hand washing is a priority for infection control. Hands must be washed prior to beginning work, after using the restroom, after smoking, when working with different food substances, for example raw chicken to fresh fruit, following contact with any unsanitary surface for example touching hair, sneezing, opening doors, etcetera. Review of the facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public when they failed to keep areas around the facility free of trash, personal protective equipment (PPE), and other debris, and failed to maintain the lawn in the fenced in courtyard off Station 2. The facility census was 88. Observation on 5/3/21, starting at 9:30 A.M., showed a dead bird laying on the sidewalk leading into the main front entrance of the facility. The dead bird remained on the sidewalk until sometime after 11:30 A.M., on 5/4/21, when someone had scooted it out into the grass beside the sidewalk, about 6 inches from the walkway. Observations on 5/12/21, starting at 2:45 P.M., of the outside perimeter of the building showed: - Outside in the front resident smoking area, trash covered the grass around the area; cigarette butts were all over the ground on the concrete as well as the grass; - Three 2x4 pieces of wood were nailed across the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a manner to maintain their dignity when staff failed to maintain a covering for one sampled resident, (Resident #7), who was exposed from the waist up and visible from the hallway, failed to remove facial hair per the resident's preference for Resident #54, spoke to Residents #74 and #7 in a disrespectful manner, and failed to serve meals to residents at each table at the same time so they could enjoy their meal in a home-like atmosphere, which affected the female residents on the secure unit and failed to provide a dignity bag over the drainage bag for Resident #14. The facility also failed to ensure roommates were compatible with each other and ensure they used the reasonable person concept was when pairing roommate which affected two sampled residents (Resident #69 and #34) and failed to ensure residents on Station 2 were not exposed to an inappropriate sign in the snack/smoke room. The total number of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #42's annual MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score 15. This indicates no cognitive impairment; -Very important to have family involved in discussions about his/her care; -Diagnosis include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), hypertension, schizophrenia, anxiety, chronic pain syndrome. Review of the resident's Care Plans showed: -admit date [DATE]; -Initial care plan dated 4/12/2021; -Revised care plan dated 4/12/2021; -Care plan problem -The resident has a guardian (with a phone number) to assist in decision making due to mental illness; -Desired outcomes-The guardian will assist in making decisions for the resident; -Interventions/Tasks -Ensure guardians wishes are followed. During an interview on 5/5/21 at 2:40 P.M., the resident said: -He/she has not been invited by the facility staff to any care plan meetings; -He/she would like to be involved in his/her care while at the facility. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to promote self-determination for two of twenty residents when staff failed to help two of 20 sampled residents (Resident #16 and #54) shave at least every other day, a choice about aspects of life he/her deemed significant and have those preferences care planned, failed to allow two sampled residents (Resident #35 and Resident #50) to go outside to get exercise, failed to assist one sampled resident (Resident #4) who wished to live in a less restrictive environment, and failed to provide seconds at meal times for the four sampled residents (Resident #14, #21, #84, and #74,). Facility census was 82. 1. The facility did not provide a policy for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). 2. Review of Resident #16's annual minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 5/5/21 showed: -Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score 15. This indicates no cognitive impairment. -Making choices for daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to act promptly and resolve resident grievances voiced during the resident council meetings which were held by the Department Heads. The facility did not maintain documentation of resident concerns, attempts to resolve concerns or follow up actions. The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy regarding resident council meetings. Review of the facility's grievance policy for residents, last revised 4/29/21, included: - The purpose is to set forth the resident's right to file a grievance and the process to be followed; - The facility wants to hear and address any concern of a resident. A resident or their legal representative can bring concerns to a staff member, the resident concern group, or call the compliance hotline. Additionally each resident has the right to use the formal grievance process; - Every resident has the right to voice their grievance with the facility or other agency. Grievances could include care and treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they kept resident funds separate from the facility's operating account. This affected three additionally sampled residents. (Residents #26, #339, and #341). The facility also failed to provide quarterly statements to residents or legal representatives which affected three of 20 sampled resident (Resident #8, #68 and #84). The facility census was 82. Review of the facility policy titled Personal Items/Personal Funds, dated 4/6/17 included the following: - Purpose: to ensure that Resident Trust Fund are managed accurately to outline duties and responsibility; - Quarterly statements will be sound out to guardians by Social Service Director and hand delivered to the resident if they are responsible for self; Review of the facility policy titled Resident Trust, dated 3/1/2017, included the following: - The facility shall keep and accurate and maintained accounting system for the residents that choose to have their personal funds managed. These funds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide personal funds and a final accounting within thirty days upon discharge. This affected one additional sampled resident (Resident #340). Facility census was 82. Review of the facility polity titled Resident Trust, dated 3/1/17, included the following: - Handling the Funds of discharged Residents: Upon the discharge of a resident, the facility shall provide an up-to-date accounting of the resident's trust account balance and personal possessions; - The resident shall be issued a check for all remaining personal funds in his/her account within five (5) days of discharge. The Resident Trust Clerk shall provide a complete accounting record of the funds along with the check; - Checks received after a resident is discharged should either be forwarded to the resident or returned to the sender. If checks are made payable to the facility for the resident, they must be returned to the sender with written explanation; - If the facility is Representative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to purchase a surety bond in a sufficient amount to assure the security of all residents' personal funds deposited with the facility. The facility census was 82. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Trust, dated 3/1/17, showed the following: - The facility shall provide assurance of financial security by means of a surety bond. The bond shall be in an amount equal to at least one and one-half times the average total of the reconciled monthly balances. Review of the facility's surety bond dated September 2020 showed the bond was increased from $25,000 to $30,000. There was no approval letter from the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) for this increased bond. Review of the DHSS approval letter dated 5/21/20 showed the approval for the $25,000 bond dated 3/9/20. Review of the Resident Funds Worksheet on 5/10/21 , completed with the last 12 months of reconciled bank statements showed the required bond amount of $52,500. During an interview on 5/10/21 at 10:54 P.M. the Business Office Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0572 — pattern
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to inform residents of their rights prior to or during admission and during the residents' stay. This affected all the residents who resided on Station Two. The facility census was 82. Review of the resident council meeting notes, dated 3/24/21, showed there were no documentation regarding rights reviewed with the residents. Observation on 5/3/21 at various times showed: - The residents' rights were not posted on Station Two. During a group interview on 5/4/21 at 10:23 A.M., the residents said the following: - The residents rights are not reviewed; - They thought their rights should be posted on the wall. During an interview on 5/5/21 at 2:50 P.M., Social Services said: - They did not go over the residents' rights during the resident council meetings. During an interview on 5/13/21 at 3:23 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: - The residents' rights should be posted on Station Two.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide accessible information regarding the State Survey Agency that was readily available to residents who resided on Station Two. The census was 82. Review of resident's rights policy, revised 4/29/21, showed: - The purpose was to ensure resident rights are protected; - The facility must post the names, addresses, ant telephone numbers of all pertinent State client advocacy groups such as the State Survey and Certification agency, the State Licensure office, the State Ombudsman program, the Protection and Advocacy network, and the Medicaid fraud control unit; - This posting must include a statement that the Resident may file a complaint with the State Survey and Certification agency concerning resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property in the facility and noncompliance with the advance directive requirements. During the resident council meeting on 5/4/21 at 10:23 A.M., the residents said: - The telephone number for the State Survey Agency was not posted on Station Two; - An unknown resident had written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they updated the code status for two of 20 sampled residents (Residents #7 and #385) in order to ensure staff would respond appropriately in the event one of the residents was found unresponsive with no heartbeat, breathing, or pulse. Resident #385's medical record contained a signed Outside the Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OHDNR) form and staff did not know this to be the resident's wishes and Resident #7 did not have the identifying black dot on his/her room door indicating to staff, the resident had a signed OHDNR. The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy on Code Status. 1. Review of Resident #385's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated [DATE], showed: -Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment; -Full code status; -No hospice services documented; -Diagnosis included cancer (bone), liver…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain complete records of resident council meetings, failed to provide anonymous easy access to the grievance forms on Station Two and the dietary manager failed to respond to verbal dietary concerns voiced by the residents on Station 2. This affected all the residents who reside on Station Two. The facility census was 82. 1. Review of the facility's grievance policy for residents, last revised 4/29/21, showed, in part: - The purpose is to set forth the resident's right to file a grievance and the process to be followed; - The facility wants to hear and address any concern of a resident. A resident or their legal representative can bring concerns to a staff member, the resident concern group, or call the compliance hotline. Additionally each resident has the right to use the formal grievance process; - Every resident has the right to voice their grievance with the facility or other agency. Grievances could include care and treatment that was not provided, behavior or staff or to other residents or any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to run criminal background checks (CBC) and check the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry prior to hire. This affected four sampled staff. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility policy titled Screening- Applicant, Employee, Volunteer and Vendor (Missouri), dated 4/29/21, included the following: Pre-employment Screening: - Human Resources department (HR) will conduct pre-employment screens on applicants to determine whether the applicant has committed any disqualifying crime, is an excluded provider of any Federal or State healthcare programs, is eligible to work in the United States, and, if applicable, is duly licensed or certified to perform the duties of the position for which they applied; - HR will conduct the following screens on potential employees prior to hire (to include) o Criminal History- Using the Request for Criminal Records Check, a criminal background check should be done through the Missouri Highway Patrol's Missouri Automated Criminal History Site. A Copy of the results must be printed with the original…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed, implemented, and updated a comprehensive, person centered care plan that included measurable objectives to meet the resident's needs, conditions, and risks for three residents (Resident #14, #69, #7) out of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 82. 1. Review of the facility's comprehensive care plans and baseline care plans policy, revised 2/1/2020, showed, in part: - The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the facility must develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment; - The comprehensive care plan must be completed within 14 days of admission; - The baseline care plan must be started upon admission and completed within 48 hours of admission; - Information that will be gathered to assure accuracy of MDS are but may not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on physician's pre-op orders to hold medications prior to a procedure for one resident (Resident #18) resulting in the procedure being re-scheduled. Facility staff failed to follow manufacturer's guidelines while administering Flonase to one resident (Resident #2). Facility staff did not obtain physician orders for accuchecks (blood glucose monitoring system) for one resident (Resident #8) or physician orders to clean or when to change a suprapubic catheter (a hollow flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder, inserted into the bladder through a cut in the abdomen), for one resident (Resident#14). The facility census was 82. 1. Review of Resident #18's Minimum Data Set, (MDS a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff), dated 2/2/21, showed: - Cognitively intact to make daily decisions. Review of the resident's telephone order, dated 4/27/21, showed: - Hold Naproxen and Ibuprofen (NSAIDS, Non-steroidal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out their own activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide appropriate care of facial hair for Resident #54, clean fingernails for Resident #7 and provide oral care for Resident #59. The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy for shaving the residents. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that shaving was covered in Resident Rights. Review of Resident Rights, last revised 4/29/21, showed: Participate in Care: Resident will be informed by his physician of his/her health and medical condition and will be given the opportunity to participate in his/her care. 1 Review of Resident #54's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/10/21, showed: - Cognitively able to make daily decisions; - Independent with personal hygiene and bathing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 6. Review of Resident #83's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - Resident able to make daily decisions; - It was somewhat important to join in activities with groups of people; - It was very important to go outside when weather permitting; - It was very important to do his/her favorite activities; - Diagnoses included anxiety, depression, Bi-polar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); Review of subsequent quarterly MDSs revealed staff did not code resident preferences in Activities. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/3/21, showed: - Resident will reside in least restrictive environment possible dependent on physical, emotional, psychosocial needs; - Encourage resident to become engaged in facility life through group activities, meals in dining room, and therapeutic groups if applicable to needs. There was not a care plan that expressly related to the meaningful activities to meet the resident's needs. Observation on 5/11/21 at 8:42 A.M., showed the resident standing in the hallway by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made three medication errors out of 26 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.54%. This affected (Resident #39, #8 and #53). The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's Medication Administration and Monitoring Policy, dated 2/26/21, showed: - Medication is to be given per physician's order; - It is imperative that all medications are given using the seven rights to medication administration which includes: Right Medication, Right Dose and Right Dosage Form. The facility did not provide a policy for administration of rapid acting insulin in relationship to time of meal service. Review of the Flexpen manufacturer's guideline, dated May 2016 showed: - NovoLog is a fast acting insulin. A meal should be served in five to ten minutes from administration of insulin. 1. Review of Resident #53's current Physician Order Sheet (POS) for May, 2021 showed the physician ordered: - Aspirin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in accordance to professional principles when prescription and over the counter expired medications for five residents (Residents #70, 6, 8, 29, and 38) were not removed from medication and treatment carts. All residents who took the over the counter medications were at risk as well. Facility census was 82. Review of facility policy, Monthly Inspections - Medications, dated 2/26/21, showed: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the facility is monitoring the labeling and storage of all medications within the facility on a routine monthly basis. -The facility will utilize a pharmacy consultant to review the facility's storage of medications. This will include inspections of the medication carts, treatment carts, and medication rooms. -The charge nurse on night shift will complete a monthly review of all medication carts, treatment carts, and medication rooms on the last Saturday of every month. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide food in a form designed to meet individual needs when they did not ensure puree foods were at an appropriate consistency and failed to follow the recipe when making puree foods. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility policy titled Diets Policy, dated 10/23/19, included the following: - The facility will provide each resident with a regular or therapeutic diet, as ordered by the physician, in order to ensure that each resident receives the diet prescribed by the physician. The consistency of the diet shall also be ordered; - Dysphagia Puree- all foods shall be mixed in the blender to a pudding like consistency including breads and bakery products. Cream of rice is used in place of rice. Corn is avoided; - Regular Puree- Regular diet will be pureed meats, starches, vegetables, salads, and desserts. Products such as bread, cake, and cookies can be blended or slurred. Review of the dietary's list of diets showed three residents were on puree (texture modified diet in which all foods have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, organized, and readily accessible when a closed record for one out of two sampled residents (Resident #85) included records pertaining to at least thirty-eight other residents. Facility census was 82. Observation of the closed record review for Resident #85 pulled from storage located in the basement of the facility on 5/6/21 at 4:09 P.M. showed: -Fourteen other residents' consumption sheets for February 2021. -The February 2021 daily fridge temperature log for the medication room on unit 2. -Two other residents' individual patient narcotic records between January to March 2021. -Thirty-eight other residents' activities of daily living (ADL) sheets for February 2021 and ADL support provided documentation forms for February 2021. During an interview on 5/6/21 at 5:00 P.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) said: -Resident #85's closed record should not have contained those records. -The records must have accidentally been picked up together and filed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's written plan of care includes both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services furnished by the long term care (LTC) facility to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, as required when there was not a care plan created specifically for Hospice services and a Hospice chart was not in the facility for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #385). The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy on Hospice. 1. Review of Resident #385's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 4/6/21 showed: -Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score 14. This indicates no cognitive impairment. -Full code status; -No hospice services documented; -Diagnosis include Cancer (bone), Liver failure,Cirrhosis of the Liver, Schizophrenia, Anxiety, Chronic pain syndrome. Review on 5/5/21 of Resident #385's Care Plans showed: -Initial care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment when staff failed to clean the COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019, a contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, symptoms may include fever, chills, fatigue, difficulty breathing, headache, loss of taste or smell, sore throat) screening tools which included a thermometer and pulse oximeter (a device placed on the finger that measure oxygen levels and heart rate) in between surveyors, failed to properly clean glucometer (blood glucose meter used to measure blood sugars) which affected Resident #47 and #65. The facility also failed to keep the facility isolation room clean when the staff allowed Resident #384's biohazard trash can with contaminated Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to overflow on to the floor in the resident's room, donned PPE without sanitizing hands, administered medications without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the exhaust system to remove bathroom odors. The facility census was 82. 1. Observation on 5/03/21 beginning at 11:10 A.M. showed the following rooms' bathrooms had exhaust vents that were caked with dust, dirt, and debris: - room [ROOM NUMBER], #24 and #25. The fan also made a loud noise when running in room [ROOM NUMBER]. - Exhaust vents in resident rooms 2, 9, 16, 26, and 32 were caked with dust, dirt and debris, as well as the vents in the 100 east shower room and the copyroom located on center hall. During an interview on 5/13/21 at 8:55 A.M. the Housekeeping Supervisor said maintenance used to vacuum the exhaust vents and the housekeeping would keep up with them. He/she was not sure who does them now. During an interview on 5/13/21 at 11:37 A.M. the Maintenance Supervisor said: - Work order forms for maintenance requests were kept at each nurses' station. The Maintenance Assistant would check them daily and work on them that day. The Life…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure handrails were firmly affixed to the wall. The facility census was 82. 1. Observation on 5/3/21 at 11:10 A.M. showed the handrail outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose when it was grabbed. Observation on 5/3/21 at 11:47 A.M. showed the handrail outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose when it was grabbed. Observation on 5/5/21 at 9:54 A.M. showed the handrails outside the following rooms were loose when they were grabbed: - room [ROOM NUMBER], #5 (the end came apart from rail), #6, the room where the hard copy charts were being stored, outside Director of Nursing Office, #14, and #16. During an interview on 5/13/21 at 11:37 A.M. the Maintenance Supervisor said: - Work order forms for maintenance requests were kept at each nurses' station. The Maintenance Assistant would check them daily and work on them that day. The Life Enhancement Director (LED) also has a daily concerns form that they address by the end of they day if they have a maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0562 — isolated
    Provide immediate access to any resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the facility failed to provide resident representatives, Ombudsman representatives, and other healthcare professionals access to residents when the facility failed to ensure phone calls to the main phone line were answered and/or messages returned timely. Facility census was 82. Review of facility policy, Resident's Rights, dated 4/29/21, showed: -Facility must provide immediate access to any resident by the State ombudsman. -Facility must provide reasonable access to any resident by any entity or individual that provides health, social, legal, or other services to resident. During an interview on 5/3/21 at 1:02 P.M. the Resident Care Coordinator B and Infection Control Nurse said with the Administrator and Director of Nursing present: -Phone calls will ring in all offices. There is not a designated receptionist. -Phones do not get answered appropriately especially on nights and weekends, staff are busy. -If the caller does not designate where to leave a message, messages are routed to the nurses station voicemail. The nurse would be responsible for returning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #8), had access to their funds at all times, including weekends. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility policy Personal Items/Personal Funds, dated 4/6/17, included the following: - Purpose: to ensure that Resident Trust Fund are managed accurately and do outline duties and responsibility; - All residents will have access to funds family excluding weekends and Holidays. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Trust, dated 3/1/17, included the following: - The facility shall allow the residents access to their personal possessions and funds during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. 1. Review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], included the following: - Date admitted [DATE]; - Cognitively intact. During an interview on 5/04/21 at 11:44 A.M. the resident said: - It took almost all month last month to get his/her personal spending money. - He/she talked to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with reasonable access to a telephone when a resident broke the telephone, This affected the residents who resided on Station Two. The facility census was 82. 1. Review of the facility's resident's rights policy, revised 4/29/21, showed, in part: - Resident has the right tot have reasonable access tot he use of a telephone where calls can be made without being overheard. 2. Observation on 5/3/21 at various times throughout the day showed: - The private area for the residents on Station Two to make telephone calls did not have a telephone. 3. During the resident council meeting on 5/4/21 at 10:23 A.M., the residents said: - They did not have a telephone to use for private telephone calls, it was removed. 4. Review of Resident #14's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed: Cognitive skills moderately impaired; - Independent with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; - It was very important for the resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure they received authorization from the resident/representative before utilizing bed alarms and placing a bed in low position, noting the understanding of the risks and the benefits of the interventions. The facility also failed to conduct ongoing assessments of the interventions. This affected one sampled resident (Resident #69) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility did not provide a policy regarding restraints. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, dated 4/29/21, included the following: Freedom from Abuse - Resident has the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat Resident's medical symptoms. Restraints may only be imposed: o To ensure the physical safety of the resident or other residents, and o Only upon the written order of a physician that specified the duration and circumstances under which the restraints are to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to sure they contacted the guardian for one additionally sampled resident (Resident #45). Staff moved the resident to a sister facility without the guardian's approval, without providing a 30-day discharge notice to the guardian spelling out their right to appeal the discharge, the reason for the discharge, why they planned to discharge him/her, and where he/she would be transferred to after the discharge. The facility census was 82. Review of the Resident Transfer/Discharge, Immediate Discharge and Therapeutic Leave Policy, last revised on 4/29/21, showed: - The facility may discharge or transfer a resident as a facility initiated transfer or discharge for the following reasons: Resident's welfare and needs cannot be met by the facility. - Before any resident is transferred or discharged under a facility initiated transfer or discharge, the facility must notify the resident and resident representative the reason for the transfer or discharge in writing in a manner they understand; - The written notice shall include the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment, by staff qualified to assess relevant care areas and knowledgeable about the resident's status, needs, strengths, and areas of decline when one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #385) was placed on Hospice and the MDS (Minimum Data Set, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility) and care plan did not reflect the decline. One sampled resident's (Resident #69) MDS did not accurately show the resident's bowel and bladder functions or restraints. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility on policy on MDS on 4/6/21 showed: -Purpose- to understand the changes presented by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the MDS 3.0, to define the intent of each section of the MDS 3.0 and to ensure that the MDS 3.0 sections are competed accurately and in a timely manner by the assigned responsible parties. -The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process and failed to have a complete discharge summary for one of two sampled residents (Resident #85) when the facility failed to have a discharge planning care plan, failed to document a final summary of the resident's status, failed to document a recapitulation of the resident's stay timely, and failed to show that all necessary information was provided to the receiving facility. Facility census was 82. Review of facility policy, Resident Transfer/Discharge, Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave policy, dated 4/29/21, showed: -Purpose: Establish policy and procedure regarding the transfer/discharge of residents. -When a resident is discharged of transferred the Interdisciplinary Discharge Summary must be completed. -When the facility transfers or discharges the resident to another care facility or provider, the following information at a minimum shall be provided to the new facility or provider: contact information for the physician responsible, resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion when staff failed to ensure two out of two sampled residents (Residents #2 and #59) received Restorative Nursing as indicated by therapy and failed to care plan the services. Facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy for Restorative Nursing. Review of Facility's Dietary Resident Rights Policy dated 10/23/19 showed: -Restorative Care: The resident has the right to restorative care to attain their highest physical and mental functioning. 1. Review of Resident #2's quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 1/5/21, showed: -Brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score 13. This indicates no cognitive impairment. During an interview on 5/3/21 at 3:18 P.M. Resident #2 said: -He/she does not receive restorative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide access or offer one resident (Resident #7), who is dependent on staff for accessing nutrition and hydration, sufficient fluid and food intake to maintain proper hydration and health. The facility census was 82. 1. Review of the facility policy for Dietary Meal Service dated 2/26/21 showed: The usual routine for total assist trays is to prepare and deliver them last. This allows nursing attendants to feed individual residents after all other trays have been delivered (unless there is extra staff to help feed residents.) The nursing department is responsible for distributing food trays to all residents in the facility that are served in their rooms or dining rooms. The nursing department is responsible for documenting resident intake by percentages. Review of the facility policy for Supervision of Dining dated 3/4/2020 showed: Meal intake must be observed by approved trained employees/nursing employees at each meal. Percentage of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to assure staff provided proper respiratory care when they failed to date oxygen tubing and failed to properly clean the oxygen concentrator filter which affected two of 20 sampled residents, (Resident #22 and #28). The facility census was 82. The facility did not provide a policy for dating oxygen tubing and cleaning the oxygen filters. 1. Review of Resident #22's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated, 2/5/21, showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Independent with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; - Diagnoses included schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), bipolar disease (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with panic disorder, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assure one additionally sampled resident (Resident #45) with a diagnosis of disorders of the brain, received appropriate services. Staff failed to accurately document observed behaviors exhibited by the resident and other residents' responses to those behaviors. Staff did not develop interventions to address the resident's attention-seeking behaviors, including urinating on others beds/recliners, taking non-food items from other resident's rooms and placing them in his/her mouth, smearing feces in other's bathrooms, taking and breaking items from other residents, the level of supervision needed for the resident's health and safety, or any guidance for staff related to behavior modification for the resident. The facility's census was 82. Review of the facility's undated World of Focus Covenant Guidelines showed: - Residents are not allowed in other residents' rooms unless the other resident has invited them. Residents are not allowed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to assure one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #35) with a diagnosis of a bipolar disorder, schizoeffective disorder and anxiety received appropriate services to aide in moving to a less restrictive environment. The facility's census was 82. 1. Review of Resident #35's MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - Cognitively able to make daily decisions; - Independent with activities of daily living; - Very important to him/her to do favorite activities, to go outside to get fresh air when weather permits. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/5/21, showed: - Ensure that the activities the resident is attending are compatible with physical and mental capabilities and are compatible with known interests and preferences; - Provide a program of activities that is of interest and empowers the resident by encouraging/allowing choice, self-expression and responsibility. Observation and interview on 5/4/21 at 3:04 P.M., showed the resident sitting on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-02-09 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations,record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they posted in a conspicuous location and in a manner accessible to residents, resident representatives and vistors, a copy of the most current state licensure and annual certification survey results. The facility census was 83. Review of the facility's undated Resident Rights Policy., showed: -The residents of the facility have the right to examine the results of the most recent survey results conducted in the facility by Federal and State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect. During a Resident Council meeting on 2/7/24 at 10:00 A.M., the residents were unaware of the location of the last survey results for the facility. The residents in the secured female unit, were unaware of the survey results book or what is was. Observations throughout the survey from 2/6/24 through 2/9/24, showed the survey results book was not accessible to residents or the public. Observation on 2/6/24 the all female secured unit survey book did not contain the most current survey information in the book.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-05-20 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to notify all the residents of the availability and location of the most recent survey results and did not post the most recent survey results in an accessible location to the residents without having to ask staff. This affected all residents on the secured Station One unit and on the secured Station Two unit. The facility census was 82. Review of facility policy, Resident's Rights, dated 4/29/21, showed: -Residents have the right to examine the results of the most recent survey conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect. The results must be made available in a place readily accessible to residents and post a notice of their availability. 1. Observation on 5/3/21 at 9:15 A.M., showed: - The survey book was located in the front entry behind a locked door, not accessible by residents freely, and was not updated with current survey information. Observation on 5/3/21 at 11:00 A.M., of the women's secured unit showed no copy of the federal survey results accessible to the residents who lived on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$163,472 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $17,790 — penalty dated 2025-04-18
  • $145,682 — penalty dated 2024-09-19
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-26 for 48 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bernard Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Bridgewood Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Brookfield Health Care CenterBrookfield, MO 1 of 5Brunswick Health Care CenterBrunswick, MO 1 of 5Carrie Elligson Gietner Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Cassville Health Care CenterCassville, MO 1 of 5Chariton Park Health Care CenterSalisbury, MO 1 of 5Crestwood Health Care CenterFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Edgewood Manor Health Care CenterRaytown, MO 1 of 5Fair View Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Four Seasons Living CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Grand Manor Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Gregory Ridge Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Heritage Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Hidden Lake Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Holton Health Care CenterHolton, KS 1 of 5Legendary Health Care CenterMarshall, MO 1 of 5Milan Health Care CenterMilan, MO 1 of 5Nathan Richard Health Care CenterNevada, MO 1 of 5Nick's Health Care CenterPlattsburg, MO 1 of 5North Village ParkMoberly, MO 1 of 5Odessa Health Care CenterOdessa, MO 1 of 5Parkway Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Rest Haven Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Sarcoxie Health Care CenterSarcoxie, MO 1 of 5South County Health Care CenterArnold, MO 1 of 5Wellsville Health Care CenterWellsville, MO 1 of 5Westview Nursing HomeCenter, MO 2 of 5St Elizabeth Care CenterSaint Elizabeth, MO 2 of 5Stonecrest HealthcareViburnum, MO 3 of 5Greenville Health Care CenterGreenville, MO 3 of 5Portageville Health Care CenterPortageville, MONot rated (Special Focus)Hillside Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • RELIANT CARE INVESTORS II, INC — investment firm · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RELIANT CARE INVESTORS II, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/28/2013
DESTEFANE, CLYDEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/14/2020
DESTEFANE, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2020
RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/28/2013

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$657K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 95%Medicare 1%Other / private 4%

About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $657K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$181per resident / day
operating cost
$5,495per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$183per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265730. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next