Grand Manor Health Care Center
3645 Cook Ave, Saint Louis, MO 63113 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (314) 531-2352 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $126,118 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-15)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 31.1% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 82.1% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 31.5% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.7% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 66.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.4% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.3% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 20.0% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.2% | 26.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.8% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.60 | 2.11 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.60 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 107.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.17 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to one resident (Resident #2), when the facility did not initiate a Code Purple (missing resident), per facility policy, when Resident #2 failed to return to the facility for dinner and evening medications and did not return all night. The resident signed out at 8:30 A.M. on the morning of [DATE] with an expected return time of 5:25. The resident did not return to the facility and per the facility policy, staff should have initiated a Code Purple when the resident did not return at the expected time and staff couldn't contact the resident. When the resident did not return for dinner or medications that evening, staff did not initiate a Code Purple. The resident did not return on the night shift and staff did not initiate a Code Purple or a search. Per the hospital records, the resident was found on [DATE] at approximately 8:30 A.M., face down, next to a wall, unresponsive in a puddle of water. The resident had a history of falls and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a medication to one of eight sampled residents (Resident #1) whose diagnosis included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, a virus that attacks cells that help the body fight infection, making a person more vulnerable to other infections and diseases) and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML, a disease of the white matter of the brain, caused by a virus infection (polyomavirus JC) that targets cells that make the myelin sheath-the material that insulates nerve cells) when the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was not given their Biktarvy (contains three antiviral medications). The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] when he/she was unable to respond. The resident expired at the hospital. The census was 87. The administrator was notified on [DATE] at 5:56 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE], as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0555 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the rights of residents to choose their own physician when the facility discontinued services with Physician A, who provided care to 30 residents. Three of the residents were sampled and one expressed the desire to continue care with Physician A (Resident #8). The sample was 10. The census was 101.The Administrator was notified on 05/28/26 at 2:20 P.M., of the past non-compliance, which occurred on 03/25/26. The facility provided training and in-servicing for all staff regarding the facility's resident rights policies and Physician A has been reinstated to the facility as of 05/16/26. The deficiency was corrected on 05/16/26. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 09/21/25, showed the following:-Purpose: To ensure that resident rights are protected;-Resident Rights Under Social Security Act: Resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside facility. Facility must protect and promote rights of each resident,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow their abuse policy when staff failed to report a resident to resident altercation to Administration, resulting in a failure to conduct a thorough investigation into the altercation, in which one resident sustained an injury underneath his/her eye (Residents #1 and #2). The sample was four. The census was 111.Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, dated 6/12/24, showed the following:-Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed time frames;-Definitions:-Physical Abuse: Purposefully beating, striking, wounding, or injuring any resident or any manner whatsoever mistreating or maltreating a resident in a brutal or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure recipes were followed while preparing pureed meals. The facility had eight residents on pureed meals. The sample was six. The census was 112. Review of the facility's Dietary Food Preparation Policy, dated 7/5/23, showed the following:-Standardized Recipes: Standardized recipes will be used for all product prepared;-Procedure: -Use standardized recipes provided with menu cycle; -The Dietary Manager will monitor and check routinely the cooks' use of recipes. If favorite recipes are added to the recipe file, they must be written, standardized and approved by the Registered Dietitian; -Pureed recipes are found in the recipe binder. Observation on 9/30/25 at 12:20 P.M., showed [NAME] A took four, four-ounce scoops of diced chicken, placed it in a blender and blended for approximately 10 seconds, then added one slice of white bread and continued to blend. While blending, [NAME] A added water. [NAME] A said he/she did not know how much water he/she was adding and blended for approximately one minute.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's right to be free from physical abuse was not violated when another resident charged and hit him/her in the arm (Residents #1 and #2). The sample was six. The census was 112.The Administrator was notified on 10/3/25 at 10:43 A.M., of the past non-compliance, which occurred on 9/24/25. The facility provided in-servicing for all staff regarding the facility's abuse and neglect policy with emphasis on monitoring behavioral residents. The deficiency was corrected on 9/25/25. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 6/12/24, showed the following:-Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed time frames;-Definitions: Abuse is the willful infliction of injury,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services and/or treatment to increase or prevent reduction of range of motion. The facility failed to ensure one resident received recommended restorative therapy exercises after being discharged from skilled nursing therapy (Resident #3). The sample was six. The census was 112.Review of the facility's Restorative Nursing Program, dated 4/30/24, showed the following:-Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level;-Definition: Restorative Nursing Program refers to nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. This concept actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning;-Policy: -Restorative Nursing:-1. Cognitive and physical functioning of all residents will be assessed in accordance with the facility's assessment protocols;-2. The interdisciplinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident was provided with adequate supervision and staff oversight. On 9/23/25, a resident was left unsupervised in the back unsecured area during a smoking break and the resident wandered away from the facility (Resident #1). The sample was six. The census was 112. The Administrator was notified on 10/3/25 at 10:43 A.M., of the past non-compliance, which occurred on 9/23/25. The facility provided in-servicing for all staff regarding the facility's elopement and wandering policy with emphasis on monitoring residents during smoke times. The deficiency was corrected on 9/25/25. Review of the facility's Elopements and Wandering Residents policy, last reviewed on 6/12/24, showed:-Purpose: This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk;-Definitions:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards when staff failed to administer and document medications as order by the physician for three residents. (Resident #10, Resident #12 and Resident #15). The sample was 13. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Order Policy, dated 5/18/24, showed the following: -Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to outline procedures in accurately transcribing physician's orders and to ensure that all physicians' orders are followed. To ensure a process is in place to monitor nurses in accurately transcribing and following physician's orders. -Procedure: A. Upon receiving a physician's order via telephone, fax, written order, verbal order, transcribed order or other, it will be documented in residents' electronic medical records in orders section; B. The Licensed/Registered Nurse will check the emergency kit to verify if the medication is present in the facility to begin immediately. If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure resident rooms were free from mice (Resident #17, Resident #15 and Resident #16). The sample was 13. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Pest Control policy, last reviewed 5/14/24, showed: -Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents; -Definition: Effective pest control program is defined as measures to eradicate and contain common household pests (e.g., bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitoes, flies, mice, and rats); -Policy: Facility will maintain a written agreement with a qualified outside pest service to provide comprehensive pest control services on a regular and scheduled basis. Review of the facility's pest control invoices showed the following: -5/13/25, Treated interior kitchen, laundry for spiders and occasional invaders. Service interior rodents' stations of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a representative of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of transfer and discharge and failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge for one resident (Resident #4) when the resident was transferred to another facility. The sample was four. The census was 114. Review of the facility's Resident Transfer/Discharge, Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave Policy, dated 5/14/24, showed the following: -Purpose: -Establish policy and procedure regarding the transfer/discharge of residents; -Definitions: -Facility-initiated transfer or discharge: A transfer or discharge which the resident objects to, which did not originate through a resident's verbal or written request, and/or is not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences; a. Consent to or Agreement with the discharge or transfer means that the resident or their legally authorized representative has consented to or agreed with the transfer or discharge;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident with a diagnoses of diabetes and substance abuse, who left the building unnoticed for leave of absence (LOA). Staff last saw the resident on 3/31/25 at approximately 1:00 P.M. to 2:00 P.M. It was approximately seven hours until staff realized the resident was gone. Staff did not administer ordered afternoon and evening insulin (a hormone that helps your body use blood sugar for energy) injections (Resident #2). The sample was four. The census was 114. The Administrator was notified on 4/17/25 at 9:00 A.M., of the past non-compliance, which occurred on 3/31/25. The facility provided in-servicing for all staff regarding the facility's Resident's Outside Pass Policy and Elopement and Wandering Policy. The facility also updated Resident #2's care plan. The deficiency was corrected on 4/2/25. Review of the facility's Resident Outside Pass Policy (OSP), date 6/29/23, showed the following: -Purpose: -To ensure that the facility provides education and treatment/medications to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure residents' individual trust fund accounts were not allowed to go into a negative balance. The facility managed funds for 61 residents. A sample of eight residents were chosen and the deficient practice affected six residents (Residents #8, #30, #37, #64, #66 and #78). The census was 104. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Policy, dated 2/2/24, showed the following: -Purpose: Complete Procedures on Resident Trust Responsibilities; -Negative Balances in Resident Accounts; -On the last day of every month the Resident Trust Clerk must confirm that all transactions for the month have been posted and then should run a Current Account Balance report from the banking system on the last day of the month to verify resident balances. If any resident has a negative balance on the last day of the month a positive adjustment must be posted in the banking system to make their balance zero. The banking system batch should be labeled Negatives to Fund in the batch description. The state agency will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and maintain monthly account reconciliations of the facility's bank statements for two months. The census was 104. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Policy, dated 2/2/24, showed the following: -Purpose: Complete Procedures on Resident Trust Responsibilities; -Resident Trust Bank Reconciliation: A reconciliation of the bank statement module must be completed monthly. This will be completed by the facility's staff accountant responsible for the facility's financials. The reconciliation must be done by someone other than the Resident Trust Clerk. Review of the facility's resident trust accounts, showed no documentation of bank statement reconciliation's from January 2024 and April 2024. During an interview on 9/13/24 at 12:05 P.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) and the Administrator said the previous owners of the facility no longer allowed access to the bank statements. The BOM said she thought she had copies of the bank statements. The new owners took over in May 2024.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility to provide one of one residents (Residents (R) 81) a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) when he completed his Medicare A therapy services. This failure to provide the CMS for SNF ABN prevented the resident from knowing he had days remaining under Medicare A. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Advanced Beneficiary Notice implemented 01/01/24 stated, .The current CMS-approved version of the forms shall be used at the time of issuance to the beneficiary (resident or resident representative). [sic] Contents of the form shall comply with related instructions and regulations regarding the use of the form. For Part A items and services, the facility shall use the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary (SNF ABN), Form CMS-10055. Record review of R81's Face Sheet, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) was admitted to the facility for long-term care and was being skilled in therapy after a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of a transfer for one of three residents (Resident (R) 84) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Transfer/ Discharge, Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave Policy last revised 05/14/24, indicated, . Who Must Receive Notice. In the case of an emergency or immediate discharge, copies shall be sent to the Ombudsman. In Section III. r their legal representative, a copy of the Bed Hold Policy. Review of R84's Face Sheet located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was initially admitted on [DATE] for long-term care. Among his diagnoses on his Face Sheet were Type 2 diabetes mellitus and dementia. Review of R84s's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Review Date (ARD) on 06/23/24 revealed his Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was an 11, indicating he was moderately cognitively impaired.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to issue one of three residents (Resident (R) 84) or their responsible party out of a total sample of 26 residents a bed hold notice when R84 was sent to the emergency room. This failure could leave a resident to believe they would not be allowed to return when hospital ready from Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Bed Hold Policy, last revised 11/06/23 stated, .When a resident is discharged to the hospital . the Facility will provide to the resident or their legal representative, a copy of the Bed Hold Policy. Review of R84's Face Sheet located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was initially admitted on [DATE] for long-term care. Among his diagnoses on his Face Sheet were Type 2 diabetes mellitus and dementia. Review of R84s's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Review Date (ARD) on 06/23/24 revealed his Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was an 11,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen is managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for two of six residents (Resident (R) 30 and R1) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication Policy last revised 06/26/24 revealed Purpose: Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication .13. The resident's response to the medication(s), including progress towards goals and presence/absence of adverse consequences, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. 1. Review of R30's undated admission Record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accessible medical records for three of 31 sampled residents ((R)6, R9 and R47) whose electronic medical records (EMRs) were reviewed for the recertification and complaint survey. Specifically, the EMRs for R6, R9 and R47 contained no current care plans following the facilities migration from one electronic medical record system to another. This meant the Certified Nurse Aids could not access a current Plan of Care to provide appropriate care and services. As well as failed to ensure the one out of eight residents (R95) medication prescription was accurately documented in the medical record. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medical Records, dated 02/2024 revealed, .The facility shall maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, accessible and organized. In an interview with the Administrator and Regional Director of Operations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff properly stored a residents BiPAP mask when not in use for one of one sampled resident (Resident (R) 32). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled CPAP/BiPAP Cleaning Policy revised 05/14/24 revealed, BiPAP mask should be cleaned daily after use, dry well and cover with plastic bag or completely enclosed in machine storage when not in use Review of R32's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed readmission to the facility on [DATE] and with diagnosis of respiratory failure, sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/14/24, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), revealed a score of 15 out of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. The resident was coded as receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #6) right to be free from abuse was not violated, when the resident was abused by another resident (Resident #7), of eight sampled residents. Upon discovery of the abuse, a mental health aide walked away, while the victim was still on the floor with the perpetrator at his/her side, to call for a nurse. During this brief period of time, Resident #7 threw an unlit cigarette at Resident #6. The census was 87. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, dated 7/2022, showed: -Abuse definition: The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, exploitation, mistreatment, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Included is verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled with technology. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food appropriately by failing to label, date, cover and discard outdated items. The facility also failed to ensure kitchen equipment was clean and in working condition. In addition, staff failed to ensure a leaking pipe under the kitchen sink was repaired in a timely manner. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility's kitchen. The census was 62. 1. Observations on 7/10/23 at 9:15 A.M., 7/11/23 at 7:30 A.M., 7/12/23 at 9:30 A.M., showed the following: -Storage room: -A bottle of Apple Ready Care drink mix with an expiration date of 4/22/23; -Six (6) packs of V8 original Vegetable Juice with expiration dates of 11/9/19. Five packs contained all 6 cans inside the packages unopened and the one package was opened with three cans remaining; -A package of noodles wrapped in plastic wrap; without a date; -Freezer: -An opened box that contained an opened package of chicken, opened and exposed to air; -A zip lock bag contained bread sticks, without a date; -An opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to residents and/or their representatives (Residents #24, #44, #37 and #55). This affected 60 residents whose funds were handled by the facility. The census was 62. 1. Review of the facility's Trial Balance report, showed the facility holds funds for 60 residents, including Residents #24, #44, #37 and #55. 2. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/17/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included schizophrenia (serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). During an interview on 7/11/23 at 10:44 A.M., Resident #24 said the facility holds funds for him/her. Today, he/she received a quarterly statement showing transactions for his/her account. Today is the first time he/she received a quarterly statement. 3. Review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Cognitively intact;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for the residents. This includes the failure to keep resident floors clean and kempt, keeping resident hall bathrooms in clean and working order, and the failure to provide homelike common areas designated on resident halls. The sample was 16. The census was 62. 1. Observation on 7/10/23 at 9:16 A.M., showed white liquid and leftover food from the breakfast meal on the floor of room [ROOM NUMBER]. At 1:21 P.M., the white liquid remained on the floor. Observation of the 300 hall on 7/10/23 at 9:21 A.M. and on 7/11/23 at 7:45 A.M., showed the floor was sticky and appeared to have a gummy film across the floor tiles. While walking across the floor, the surveyor's shoes made a loud sound as the adhesive properties of the uncleaned floor stuck to the bottoms of the surveyor's shoes. Observation of the 300 hall common room on 7/10/23 at 12:39 P.M., showed the floor of the common area was dirty,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit residents' Minimum Data Sets (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, in a timely manner for 3 of 3 months reviewed. The census was 62. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument manual, version 1.18.11 dated October 2023, showed: -All Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified nursing homes and swing beds, or agents of those facilities, must transmit required MDS data records to CMS' Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System; -Transmitting Data: Providers must transmit all sections of the MDS 3.0 required for their State-specific instrument and all tracking or correction information; -The manual includes a submission timeframe table for MDS record types. Review of the facility's CMS submission, MDS final validation report, submitted 4/5/23, showed: -27 records processed; -8 records submitted late. Review of the facility's CMS submission, MDS final validation report, submitted 4/26/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate, and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of four residents (Resident #11, #58, #7 and #23). The sample was 16. The census was 62. Review of the facility's Care Plan Policy, undated, showed: Policy: Care plan coordination to provide the optimum level of functioning of each resident; To assure that all residents have an accurate and updated plan of care that reflect that individual needs and correlates with the submitted Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff; Procedure: Each resident's chart will be reviewed quarterly and/or with a change of condition, by a committee consisting of Care Plan Coordinator, Dietary, Wound Care Nurse, Therapy, Nursing, Activities and Social Services; The charge nurse to inform the Care Plan Coordinator with any updated or changed assessments on resident; Care plans to be updated as needed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) meetings consisted of the required committee members when the Medical Director failed to attend the facility's QAPI meetings. The census was 62. Review of the facility's monthly QAPI sign-in sheets for the last 12 months, reviewed 7/11/23, showed the Medical Director or his designee not in attendance. During an interview on 7/13/23 at 1:56 P.M., the Administrator said the facility holds QAPI meetings on a monthly basis. The facility identifies which issues to work on during QAPI meetings. QAPI meetings should be attended by all department heads and the facility's Medical Director. The Medical Director has attended a QAPI meeting in the past 12 months, but the Administrator could not recall the date of the last meeting the Medical Director attended. The Medical Director has not signed in on the QAPI meeting attendance sheets. She expected the Medical Director to attend and QAPI meetings, at least quarterly.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in infection prevention and control (IPC) as the infection preventionist (IP) for the facility's infection prevention control program. The census was 62. Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention's interim infection prevention and control recommendations to prevent COVID-19 spread in nursing homes, updated 2/2/22, showed: -Development of an IPC program; -Assign one or more individuals with training in IPC to provide on-site management of the IPC program; -This should be a full-time role for at least one person in facilities that have more than 100 residents or that provide on-site ventilator or hemodialysis services. Smaller facilities should consider staffing the IPC program based on the resident population and facility service needs identified in the IPC risk assessment. During an interview on 7/14/23 at 8:51 A.M. the Administrator said one floor nurse is currently certified as an IP, but is not performing those tasks or heading up the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodations of needs were provided for one resident (Resident #58) with diagnoses of aphasia (language impairment) and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). The sample was 16. The census was 62. Review of Resident #58's medical record, showed: -The resident listed as his/her responsible party; -Diagnoses included stroke, aphasia, hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side, and depression, recurrent and severe. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/29/23, showed: -Resident rarely/never understood; -Short term memory ok; -Made decisions regarding tasks of daily life independent - decisions consistent/reasonable; -Required extensive assistance of one person physical assist for bed mobility; -Total dependence of two (+) person physical assist for transfers; -Upper and lower extremity impairment to one side. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to verify the accurate code status due to conflicting information in the medical record for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident #7). The census was 62. Review of the facility's Advanced Directives policy, showed: Regarding: Ensure the residents' wishes are communicated; -Procedure: -Upon admission, the resident will give the facility any legal documents such as durable power of attorney, living will and trust, legal guardianship documents, and/or any surrogate delegation of rights with those rights clearly written; -Should a resident change their code status abruptly, you are to go by their wishes and document the change of the code status; -Should the resident not have prior advance directives, the social services department and/or nursing will ask the resident questions to determine what decisions the resident has made regarding emergency end of life care. If there are no advance directives, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, initiate life sustaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for 3 of 16 sampled residents (Residents #7, #11 and #23). The census was 62. 1. Review of Resident #7's progress notes, dated 10/27/2022 at 11:09 A.M., showed the resident was put onto hospice on 10/26/22. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/9/23 showed: -admission date of 2/27/18; -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as personal hygiene, eating, dressing, bathing, mobility and dressing. -Diagnoses of anemia (low red blood cell count), wound infection and hip fracture; -Special services received while a resident: Hospice Care; -Does the resident have a condition or chronic disease that may result in life expectancy less than six months: No; -Staff failed to accurately document the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #58) received a splint as ordered for contracture management. The facility identified seven residents with splints. The census was 62. Review of Resident #58's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included stroke, aphasia, (language impairment) and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body; -A physician order, dated 10/5/22, to apply left resting hand splints as tolerated. Review of the resident's occupational therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], showed: -Diagnoses included contracture, left hand; -Goal, discontinued 2/1/23: Patient will achieve normal anatomical alignment of left hand and left fingers for 8 hours in order to achieve proper alignment, in order to decrease discomfort, in order to facilitate joint mobility, and in order to maintain joint integrity;. -Comments: The patient needs to continue wearing the splint daily up to 4 hours. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer for one resident (Resident #11) and implement fall prevention interventions for two residents (Residents #58 and #49). In addition, the facility failed to secure soiled utility and janitors' closets on the 200 and 300 halls that contained trash, soiled linen, cleaning equipment and chemicals. The sample was 16. The census was 62. Review of the facility's Transfer policy, undated, showed: Policy: All residents shall be assessed upon admission to determine their method of transfer; Input regarding transfers shall be made by nursing services, restorative and/or the therapy department to ascertain the safest method of transfer for the resident; -Nursing services shall review the resident's current diagnosis, condition, cognitive status, weight bearing status, mobility, and other pertinent physical information to determine the safest method of transferring the resident; -Once the safest method of transfer has been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate respiratory services were provided for one resident (Resident #18) when staff failed to ensure the oxygen related orders matched the electronic physician orders sheet (ePOS), physician order sheets (POS) in the resident's medical record and the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Staff also failed to obtain physician orders related to changing oxygen tubing and the oxygen humidifier bottle. The sample was 16. The census was 62. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/28/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease that prevent the lungs from working properly); -Oxygen therapy. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed: -Problem: -The resident is at risk for shortness of breath related to COPD; -The resident is non-compliant by continuing to smoke cigarettes despite resident teaching; -Approach:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed rail (side rail) assessments were completed accurately and routinely in accordance with the facility's policy for three residents (Residents #58, #34 and #14) and to obtain physician orders for the use of the side rails. The facility identified six residents with side rails. The census was 62. Review of the facility's Side Rail and Bed Assessment policy, undated, showed: -Procedure: The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team (IDT), considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment; -After appropriate review and consent, side rails may be used at the resident's request to increase the resident's sense of security (e.g., if he/she has a fear of falling, his/her movement is compromised, or he/she is used to sleeping in a larger bed); -Side rails may be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a yearly review of code status, full code (if the heart stops beating or breathing ceases, all life saving methods are performed) or no code (do not resuscitate, no life prolonging methods are performed), and failed to verify code status by having conflicting information in the medical record for six of 20 sampled residents (Residents #17, #57, #83, #67, #9 and #93). The census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #17's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/3/19, showed the following: -readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included major depression, obesity and heart disease. Review of the medical record on 12/4/19, showed a signed facility code status form in the front of the chart read full code, dated 11/7/18. Further review of the medical record on 12/5/19, showed the signed form, dated 11/7/18, replaced with a blank code status form, dated 12/4/19. 2. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify the diagnosis for administration of antibiotic medication, failed to obtain a neurology consultation in a timely manner and left medication at a resident's bedside without an order. The facility also failed to obtain orders for the use of an indwelling catheter, the use of siderails, the use of a Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure machine and failed to transcribe the size for an indwelling urinary catheter to the physician's orders sheet, for five of 20 sampled residents (Residents #93, #29, #50, #9 and #13. The census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #93's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/15/19, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Required limited assistance with activities of daily living; -Diagnoses included diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper perineal care (peri-care, cleansing of the surface area between the thighs, extending from the pubic bone to the tail bone) for two of four observations (Residents #74 and #82) and failed to provide personal grooming to one resident by not shaving him/her (Resident #84). The sample size was 20. The census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #74's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/11/19, showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Dependent on staff for personal hygiene and toileting; -Colostomy (a surgical procedure that brings one end of the large intestine out through the abdominal wall) and frequently incontinent of bladder; -Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Observation on 12/3/19 at 10:52 A.M., showed the resident sat on the toilet and, with gloved hands, Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) A removed the colostomy bag and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for dialysis (process for removal of waste and excess water from the blood due to kidney failure) care and monitoring of dialysis access sites, administer medications as ordered on dialysis days and ensure a resident's dialysis center information on the care plan and physician's order sheet (POS) were congruent, for four residents (Residents #88, #5, #68 and #32) who received dialysis. The facility identified seven residents on dialysis, four were chosen for the sample of 20 and problems were found with all four of them. The census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #88's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/13/19, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Independent with activities of daily living (ADLs); -Received dialysis; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure and diabetes. Review of the resident's care plan, updated on 11/27/19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated when placed in the walk-in refrigerator and failed to cover the stand up mixer and slicer when not in use. The census was 96. 1. Observation of the kitchen, showed the following: -On 12/3/19 at 10:10 A.M. and 4:45 P.M. and 12/4/19 at 11:23 A.M., two thawed and undated five pound rolls of ground beef, two undated, large, thawing turkey roasts and one undated, large, thawing smoked turkey roast, sat on trays on the bottom shelf of the walk-in refrigerator; -On 12/5/19 at 9:39 A.M. and 12/6/19 at 6:45 A.M., one five pound roll of thawed ground beef and one smoked turkey, dated 12/4/19, sat on trays on the bottom shelf of the walk-in refrigerator. During an interview on 12/5/19 at 11:23 A.M., [NAME] H said the turkey and ground beef should be dated when placed in the refrigerator, but sometimes if the packaging was wet, the date, written in marker, came off. 2. Observation of the kitchen, showed the following: -On 12/3/19 at 10:10 A.M. and 4:45 P.M., 12/4/19 at 11:23 A.M. and on 12/5/19 at 9:39 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized acceptable infection control measures during perineal care (peri-care, cleansing of the surface area between the thighs, extending from the pubic bone to the tail bone) for one of four residents observed (Resident #74), by allowing urinary catheter (small rubber tube inserted in to the bladder to drain urine) tubing and the privacy bag (rubber bag that holds the catheter bag to provide dignity) to lie on the floor, by feeding two residents at the same time even though one of those residents had an infectious disease (Resident #9), and by not cleansing hands between residents when passing medications. The sample size was 20. The census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #74's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/11/19, showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Dependent on staff for personal hygiene and toileting;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' privacy and confidentiality of medical information by leaving identifying information, a physician's order sheet and a laboratory result, in the survey binder, which is accessible to all residents and the public. The census was 96. 1. Observation of the front desk on all days of the survey, from 12/3/19 through 12/6/19, showed a sign which indicated the survey results binder was located at the front desk. Further observation of the front desk, showed a binder labeled Survey Results. 2. Review of the survey results binder, showed the following: -A March 2019 physician order sheet for one resident; -A urinalysis (urine test) result, dated 2/22/18, for one resident; -An audit sheet, dated 11/4/19, identified a resident by name and his/her location; -An audit sheet, dated 10/5/19, identified a resident by name and his/her location. 3. During an interview on 12/6/19 at 10:00 A.M., the administrator said she and the business office manager maintain the survey results binder. She agreed there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to contact the physician and dietician when a resident experienced a significant weight loss for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #50). The census was 96. Review of Resident #50's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/5/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff for all mobility and personal care; -Diagnoses included altered mental status and osteoporosis (brittle bones). Review of the facility face sheet, showed an additional diagnosis of dementia. Review of the care plan, dated 11/27/19 and in use during the survey, showed the following: -Problem: Nutritional status; -Goal: Regular diet. Resident requires assistance with feeding due to low vision and resident will verbalize understanding of dietary regimen; -Interventions: Assist with meals, obtain dietary consult and follow recommendations, provide Boost (nutritional supplement), one can by mouth four times a day Review of the dietician's note,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-12-06 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written notice for transfer/discharge notice to the resident and/or resident's representative, when the resident was transferred to the hospital for various medical reasons for six sampled residents (Residents #9, #14, #83, #5, #93 and #67). The sample was 20. The census was 96. 1. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Sets (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, admission and discharge assessments, showed the following: -Original admission date of 1/18/19; -discharged to the hospital on [DATE]; -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the resident's progress notes, showed the resident readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review, showed no documentation the resident and/or their representative was provided a written notice of the resident's transfer to the hospital. 2. Review of Resident #14's MDS admission and discharge assessments, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$126,118 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $26,130 — penalty dated 2026-04-15
- $99,988 — penalty dated 2024-02-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRAND MANOR ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | since 05/01/2024 |
| ARSHAD, ABDULLAH | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 05/01/2024 |
| ALLEN, ROBIN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 05/01/2024 |
| DESTEFANE, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/01/2024 |
| RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/10/2024 |
| RCG INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/10/2024 |
| RELIANT CARE GROUP OF WEBSTER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/10/2024 |
| TLG II LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/10/2024 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $733K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265717. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.