Westview Nursing Home
301 West Dunlop Street, Center, MO 63436 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (573) 267-3920 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
- it has 6 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $42,680 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-21)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.7% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.2% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 66.8% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.4% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 44.6% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.4% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.8% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 53.6% | 23.5% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.7% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.0% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.54 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.27 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 174% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 59.4 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.15 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.41 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.14 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Actual harm · Hcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and respect for four residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #6) in a review of nine sampled residents. Residents described staff as being rude, disrespectful and were loud, snappy, and yelled at them. Others described staff as talking down to them, scolding them and making them feel stupid while others said staff mocked and made fun of them, calling them a liar, and making them feel terrible, angry, frustrated, and not like home. The census was 56.Review of the facility policy, Resident's Rights - Missouri, last revised 7/2023 showed the following:-A resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. The facility must protect and promote rights of each resident, including each of the following rights:- The resident has the right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately transcribe physician orders received from a transferring facility upon admission to the facility for one resident (Resident #18), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The resident admitted with physician orders to receive medications to treat anxiety and depression, and did not receive the medications for 14 days. The resident reported experiencing depressed mood and significant mood fluctuations as a result of not receiving the medication. The facility census was 56. Review of Drugs.com on 06/05/25 showed the following: -Buspar is an anti-anxiety medicine that affects chemicals in the brain that may be unbalanced in people with anxiety; -Take Buspar exactly as prescribed; -If switching anxiety medication, the resident may need to slowly decrease the dose of the other medication rather than stopping suddenly; Some anxiety medications can cause withdrawal symptoms when you stop taking them suddenly after long-term use; -Depakote affects…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-26 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement behavioral health interventions to ensure the physical and psychosocial well-being of two residents (Resident #1 and #2), in a review of four sampled residents. Staff identified Resident #1, who had diagnoses of anxiety and depression, had a language/communication barrier and became agitated when unable to communicate effectively and was not aggressive unless provoked. The facility failed to identify meaningful interventions to address the root cause of the resident's behaviors, and the facility did not ensure an effective means for the resident to communicate his/her needs which resulted in increased agitation. On 2/24/24, the resident became agitated when unable to have a second slice of pizza. Staff administered a medication (that was not ordered to treat the resident's anxiety) to treat the resident's agitation. Staff failed to identify the root cause of the resident's behavior and develop interventions to address the root…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-12-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #42's weight record showed the following: -January 153 lbs.; -February 150 lbs. Review of the resident's significant change in status MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Diagnosis of diabetes(disease inhibits the production of insulin that controls blood sugar), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) -Requires extensive physical assistance of one staff member for eating; -Mechanically altered diet; -Weighs 150 pounds (lbs.) -Triggered nutrition risk, will proceed with care plan. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 2/27/19, showed it did not address the resident's nutrition risk. Review of Nutritional Notification, dated March 2019, showed; -The resident weighed 145 lbs; -Significant weight loss of 5 lbs in one month; -Mechanical soft diet; -Legal guardian notified and physician signed. Review of the resident's weight record showed the following: -March 145 lbs.; -April 144 lbs. Review of the Registered Dietitian Nutrition assessment, dated 4/9/19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff did not handle, seal, label, or date food items in order to prevent potential contamination. Staff did not practice proper handwashing, glove hygiene, and consumption and storage of personal food and beverage items. Staff did not ensure dishes and utensils were in good condition, or that they were cleaned, stored, and handled in a sanitary manner. Staff did not maintain surfaces and equipment to be free from a buildup of debris and ensure trash cans were covered when not in use. Staff failed to ensure equipment was in good working order. The facility census was 56. 1. Record review of the facility policy, Dietary - Receiving and Storing Food and Supplies, revised 6/30/23, showed the following: -Eggs shall be checked for cracks and any cracked eggs shall be disposed of; -Dry Storage: Any opened products shall be placed in seamless plastic or glass containers with tight-fitting lids or Ziploc bags, plastic film, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct pre-employment screenings, including the criminal background check (CBC), the employee disqualification list (EDL) and/or the family care safety registry (FCSR) which would included both the CBC and EDL screenings, and/or the Nurse Aide (NA) registry, as directed by facility policy, for seven of 10 sampled newly hired employees reviewed. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 10/25/22, showed the following: -The facility would not employ individuals who have been convicted of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating individuals; -Potential employees are screened for a history of abuse, neglect, or mistreating of residents. Review of the facility's Applicant, Employee, Volunteer, and Vendor Screening Policy, last reviewed/revised on 05/14/24, showed the following: -Corporation was committed to compliance with Federal and State regulations regarding the screening of individuals who may be in contact with residents or providing services that are, in a whole or in part, payable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two staff (Nurse Aide (NA) J and the Environmental Services (EVS) Director), providing transportation for two residents who had elected Full Code status including (Resident #47 and #43) of 18 sampled residents, maintained current cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR -an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) certification for healthcare providers as required. The training must be obtained with a provider in accordance with the accepted national standards, through a CPR provider whose training included hands-on practice and in-person skills assessment and as facility policy directed. The facility failed to ensure four additional staff, (Certified Occupational Therapy (COTA) Program Director, Administrator, Activity Director and the Business Office Manager/Human Recourses (BOM/HR), in a review of eighteen staff, maintained current CPR certification for health care providers through a CPR provider who who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to develop and provide an individualized activity program to meet the residents' needs and interests to support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for three residents (Residents #25, #18, and #3), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility failed to develop a care plan to identify the residents' preferences to ensure an ongoing program to support their choice of activities. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility policy, Activities, revised 07/19/23, showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all residents in the facility are provided an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with comprehensive assessment, their interests and their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; -The Life Enhancement Director coordinates section F of the comprehensive assessment and ensures that activities are designed to promote and enhance the emotional health, self…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the prevention of communicable disease in regards to Tuberculosis (TB; a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough, and difficulty breathing) when the facility failed to ensure Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST) for five employees in a review of ten newly hired employees reviewed, were completed in accordance with the general requirements for TB testing for long-term care employees. The facility also failed to ensure staff utilized Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), as required by facility policy, when providing care to one resident (Resident #39), in a review of 18 sampled residents, who required the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care. Facility census was 56. Review of the facility's Tuberculosis Testing policy, last reviewed 06/29/2023, showed the following: -Upon hire, a new employee will receive a 2-step PPD (purified protein derivative/TB) skin test; -All TB tests records will be kept on file in the according areas (employee files). 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and/or administer the pneumococcal vaccine as indicated by the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for five residents (Resident #18, #23, #37, #50, and #39), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility policy, Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations, revised on 05/14/24, showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all residents residing in the facility are offered influenza and pneumococcal immunizations to prevent infection and the spread of communicable diseases; -The resident or their legal representative will be informed that the pneumococcal immunization will be offered upon admission per CDC guidelines. The pneumococcal immunization will not be given if the immunization is medically contraindicated, the facility has evidence to support the resident received the immunization, or the resident or their legal representative has refused the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise the comprehensive care plan for two residents (Resident #26 and #14), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility failed to update Resident #26's care plan to address the resident's use of antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antianxiety medications, failed to update Resident #47's care plan to address the resident's need for a mechanical lift transfer, and failed to update Resident #14's care plan with interventions for wound care and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on 10/31/2024, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement interventions to address weight loss, including providing assistance with eating to prevent unplanned weight loss for one resident (Resident #47), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility policy, Weight Monitoring, revised 05/07/24, showed the following: -Purpose: Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or the resident preferences indicate otherwise; -Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant, unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) or insidious weight loss (gradual unintended loss over a period of time) may indicate a nutritional problem; -The facility will utilize a systemic approach to optimize a resident's nutritional status. This process…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a dialysis fistula ( a connection that a surgeon makes between an artery and a vein to make it possible for a person to receive hemodialysis) before and after dialysis treatments and to monitor for bruit (audible vascular sound associated with turbulent blood flow) and thrill (a vibration caused by blood flowing through the fistula) every shift as directed in facility policy for one resident (Resident #50), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address the care and monitoring of the resident's fistula. The facility identified two residents who received dialysis treatments. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's dialysis policy, last reviewed on 03/18/22, showed the following: -The facility will ensure residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences; -The facility would ensure each resident received care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food that accommodated one resident's (Resident #12) preferences and allergies, in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 56. The facility did not have a policy for preferences/allergies/substitutions. 1. Review of Resident #12's face sheet showed he/she was lactose intolerant. Review of the resident's diagnoses list, dated 11/03/22, included gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) (a chronic condition where stomach contents, including acid, reflux back into the esophagus causing symptoms like heartburn, chest pain, and other digestive issues). Review of the resident's care plan, revised on 01/11/24, showed the following: -He/She was lactose intolerant; -He/She would not receive items he/she was allergic to; -He/She was on a regular diet. No bread per resident request; -Dietary department will monitor diet monthly to ensure proper dietary recommendations; -He/She will request special foods from dietary then refuse and say that there was something wrong with it and will refuse to eat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for one resident (Resident #4), in a review of eight sampled residents. Resident #4, who resided on the facility's locked unit, had a history of elopement. Resident #4 obtained the fenced courtyard door access code and left the facility without staff knowledge, unaccompanied and without prior authorization. He/She returned 20 minutes later, using the same door code access to regain entry into the facility courtyard, without staff knowledge. The resident used the front door access code to leave through the locked unit courtyard door; the door codes were the same and had not been changed to two different codes every week per the facility's procedure. The resident said he/she had planned to hitch-hike, but the weather was too cold, so he/she returned to the facility. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility policy, Elopements and Wandering Residents, revised 06/12/24, showed the following: -The facility ensures that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of individual needs for one resident (Resident #1), in a review of sampled four residents. The facility failed to address the resident's communication barrier, provide effective communication tools, and ensure all staff were aware of the communication tools necessary to determine the resident's needs. The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's policy for communication with persons with limited English proficiency (LEP), last reviewed on 6/30/23, showed the following: -Purpose of the policy was to ensure that all residents receive care in a language that they understand; -Facility would take reasonable steps to ensure that persons with LEP had meaningful access and an equal opportunity to receive skilled nursing care and participate in activities and programs; -The policy of the facility was to ensure meaningful communication with LEP residents involving their medical conditions and treatment;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Residents #1), in a review of four sampled residents, was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. The facility administered a medication ordered for itching to the resident following an incident of agitation which staff identified was a response to the resident's communication barrier. The facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication for use of a newly ordered antipsychotic medication implemented following an incident where the resident responded with physical aggression after another resident pushed him/her onto the bed. The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's Psychotropic and Antipsychotic PRN (as needed)) Medication Orders Guideline, dated 11/28/17, showed the following: -While there may be isolated situations where pharmacological intervention was required first, these situations do not negate the obligation of the facility to develop and implement non-pharmacological interventions;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen, failed to ensure food items in storage and in the refrigerators/freezers were properly labeled, dated, and sealed to protect from potential contamination, and failed to ensure an air gap between the ice machine and the floor drain. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's policy, Receiving and Storing Food and Supplies, dated as last reviewed 6/30/23, showed the following: -Dry food storage: Storage area shall be easily accessible for receiving new items. The walls, ceiling, and floor shall be maintained in good repair and regularly cleaned. Any opened products shall be placed in seamless plastic or glass containers with tight-fitting lids or Ziploc bags. Open products may also be sealed utilizing plastic film or tape. -Frozen foods: Foods to be frozen shall be stored in airtight containers or wrapped in heavy-duty aluminum foil, plastic film, or special laminated papers, date and label a received date. -Food storage: All products shall be dated upon receipt or when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-28 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meetings. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's QAPI Plan Policy, last reviewed 07/09/21, showed the following: -This QAPI plan provided guidance for the facility overall quality improvement program. Quality assurance performance improvement principles will drive the decision making within the facility. Decisions would be made to promote excellence in quality of care, quality of life, resident choice, person directed care, and resident transitions; -QAPI activities are integrated across all parts of the facility. Each department would have a representative on the QAPI committee. If a representative is not available, the department area will still be addressed through committee discussions. The QAPI activities would cross departments and staff across all departments wouldl work together to assure the facility addresses all concerns and strives to continuously improve the provided services. The facility strives to employ evidence based…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-28 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to keep residents from going into a negative balance which allowed the residents to spend another resident's money without written authorization for 32 residents (Resident #4, #5, #11, #12, #15, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #23, #25, #31, #35, #36, #38, #40, #43, #45, #46, #48, #50, #51, #53, #58, #59, #60, #62, #403, #404, #405 and #406). The facility managed funds for 46 residents. The facility census was 53. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Trust - Current Account Balance Report as of 11/30/2022, dated 09/01/23, showed the following residents were allowed to go into a negative balance for 11/2022. Resident Amount #11 <$9.75> #20 <$50.00> #36 <$24.11> #40 <$4.03> #43 <$0.16> #405 <$30.00> #406 <$35.74> 2. Record review of the facility maintained Trust - Current Account Balance Report as of 12/31/2022, dated 09/01/23, showed the following residents were allowed to go into a negative balance for 12/2022. Resident Amount #17 <$9.07> #20 <$65.00> #23 <$29.60> #25 <$9.11> #36 <$8.41> #38 <$2.86> 3. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-28 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund account and by not reconciling each month. The facility managed funds for 46 residents. The facility census was 53. 1. Record review of the facility maintained reconciliation forms, dated August 2022 through July 2023, showed the facility attempted to reconcile by inserting numbers, to make it appear as though the reconciliation showed a zero balance for the following months. -August 2022: fund facility error $4.31, $11.87, $147.17 and $306.16; fund negative balance $28.60 and $20; fund missing funds $500; -September 2022: fund facility error $306.16; fund missing funds $500; fund unknown debit $453.39; -October 2022: fund unknown debit $453.39; -November 2022: fund unknown debit $453.39; fund check 5011 error #321; -December 2022: fund check 5011 error $321; fund negative balances $51.13; posting error-fund $645; paid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-28 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide notification when the resident's trust account reached $200 less the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource for six residents (Residents #5, #9, #13, #27, #30 and #33). The facility managed funds for 46 residents. The facility census was 53. 1. Record review of the facility maintained Trust - Current Account Balance Report as of 07/31/2023, dated 09/07/23, showed the following residents had the following balances: Resident Amount #5 $6,455.71 #9 $10,649.83 #13 $6,983.27 #33 $5,555.45 2. Record review of the facility maintained Trust - Current Account Balance Report as of 06/30/2023, dated 09/01/23, showed the following residents had the following balances: Resident Amount #5 $12,920.39 #9 $9,601.33 #13 $6,648.48 #27 $8,610.45 #30 $5,683.66 #33 $7,529.78 3. Record review of the facility maintained Trust - Current Account Balance Report as of 05/31/2023, dated 09/01/23, showed the following residents had the following balances: Resident Amount #9 $9,027.08 #13 $6,296.31 #27 $7,107.94 #33 $6,438.45 4. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, homelike environment for residents who resided in the facility. The facility failed to ensure walls, floors, ceilings, doors, linens, equipment, and furniture were clean and in good repair. The facility census was 53. Review of the policies received from the facility on [DATE] showed the facility did not provide policies specific to housekeeping and facility maintenance as requested. 1. Observation on [DATE] at 9:20 A.M. showed the arm rest cover on Resident #13's wheelchair was torn and rough with wood showing through the torn areas. The floor in the resident's room was dirty with a brown/black substance and debris. There was a strong urine odor in the room. There was no soap in the soap dispenser in the bathroom, and there was a used uncovered graduate on the floor with a yellowish substance in the container. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:20 A.M., the resident said he/she had asked for a new wheelchair, but he/she had not received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive care plans for four residents (Resident #28, #30, #34, and #53), in a review of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans and Baseline Care Plans, last reviewed 1/19/22, showed the following: -The purpose was to ensure the facility developed a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment; -The Comprehensive Care Plan must be completed within 14 days of admission; -Daily nursing meetings will occur Monday thru Friday with a review of the resident's medical, functional and psychosocial problems. From this meeting, information will be individualized to the resident's plan of care. On Monday morning, the resident's status will be reviewed from the weekend to ensure all areas that need to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for two residents (Residents #28 and #14), in a review of 21 sampled residents. The facility failed to follow physician's orders for dressing changes to diabetic foot ulcers for Resident #28, and failed to administer medication as ordered by the resident's physician to Resident #14. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's policy for following physician's orders, dated 7/9/21, showed the following: -The purpose of the policy was to outline procedures to ensure physician's orders were followed and that a process was in place to monitor nurses in accurately following physician's orders; -Upon receiving a physician's order via telephone, fax, written order, transcribed order, or other, it will be written on the physician's order sheet (POS); -The unit director/designated nurse would review of medication administration records and treatment administration records daily to monitor for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) for five dependent residents in a review of 21 sampled residents. Staff failed to provide oral care for two residents (Residents #6 and #24) who were NPO (nothing by mouth) and received only tube feedings. Staff failed to provide complete perineal care for three incontinent residents (Resident #6, #8, and #24. Staff failed to monitor resident #50 for incontinence and/or provide incontinence care as warranted. The facility census was 53. During an interview the director of nursing said the facility did not have a policy for providing activities of daily living (ADL) care. Review of the facility policy, Gastronomy Tubes (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition), dated 8/30/23, showed the resident with a feeding tube is usually NPO. Dry mouth, dry lips and sore throat are sources of discomfort. The resident's care plan will often include frequent oral hygiene, lubricant for the lips…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve the correct portion sizes as directed for residents on a low concentrated sweets (LSC)/consistent carbohyrdate (CCHO) diet for the lunch meal on 8/22/23. The facility census was 53. Review of the diet report dated 8/22/23 showed 11 residents had diet orders for a low concentrated sweets (LSC)/consistent carbohyrdate (CCHO) diet. Review of the diet spreadsheet menu for the lunch meal on 8/22/23 showed staff were to serve residents on a LSC/CCHO diet a 4-ounce portion of spaghetti with meat sauce and a #12 dip of banana pudding (2.875 ounces). During an interview on 8/22/23 at 11:50 A.M. Dietary Aide M said he/she portioned the banana pudding into bowls with a #8 (4 ounces) scoop. Observation on 8/22/23 between 11:55 A.M. and 12:40 P.M., showed [NAME] N served all residents on a LSC/CCHO diet a 6-ounce portion of spaghetti with meat sauce (instead of 4-ounce serving) and a #8 dip (4-ounce) serving of banana pudding (instead of a 2.875-ounce serving). During an interview on 8/22/23 at 2:40 P.M., Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the prevention of communicable disease in regards to Tuberculosis (TB) (a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough, and difficulty breathing) when the facility failed to ensure Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST) for four new employees (Registered Nurse (RN) A, Social Services Director, Maintenance Director, Nurse Aide (NA) G) of ten new employees reviewed, were completed in accordance with the general requirements for TB testing for long-term care employees. The ten sampled employees were hired since the previous survey. Staff failed to ensure proper infection control techniques including proper hand hygiene and proper gloving was followed while providing incontinence care for four residents (Resident #6, #8, #28, and #31) and failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #30's), urinary catheter (a tube inserted in to the bladder to excrete urine out of the body) drainage bag and tubing did not rest on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of pests. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's pest policy dated 6/29/23 showed it was not specific to the facility's prevention, treatment, and/or maintenance of flies. 1. Review of Resident #50's progress note dated 7/5/23 at 11:57 A.M. showed the resident showed staff his/her right forearm which was noted to be red, swollen, and warm to touch. The forearm had a white head with brown dot in the middle. The physician was notified and orders were obtained for Keflex (oral antibiotic) and warm compresses to the affected area. Review of physician's progress note dated 7/11/23 showed on 7/5/23 resident's left forearm was hot, red, and had a brown dot in the center which looked like a spider bite. The resident was started on Keflex and warm compresses. Assessment revealed a boil on his/her left forearm. Review of resident's Minimum Data Set, (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of individual needs by ensuring resident's call lights were in reach at all times for two residents (Resident #24 and #31) in a review of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 53. The facility did not have a policy regarding accessibility of call lights. 1. Review of Resident #24's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/25/23, showed the following: -Moderately impaired cognition; -Totally dependent on two staff for transfers. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 7/27/23, showed the following: -Totally dependent with all activities of daily living (ADLs); -Required assist of two staff for bed mobility and transfers; -The resident required a safe environment with a working and reachable call light and personal items in reach. Observation on 8/21/23 at 11:40 A.M., showed the resident lay in his/her bed. His/Her call light lay on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide proper care for two sampled residents (Residents #6 and #24) who had gastrostomy tubes (a tube inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach to provide nutrition), in a review of 21 residents. The facility failed to label the nutritional bottles, failed to check placement and residual prior to administering medications, failed to properly administer tube medications, and failed to ensure Resident #24's bed was elevated as appropriate while he/she received nutrition through the feeding tube. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility policy, Gastrostomy Tubes, dated 1/19/22, showed the following: -The resident with a feeding infusing should not lie flat. The head of the bed should be elevated. Some procedures will need to be changed slightly for the resident with a feeding infusing. For example, an occupied bed cannot be flattened to change the linen; -When multiple medications are scheduled for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two nurse aides (NA D and NA E), completed a nurse aide training program within four months of their employment in the facility. The facility census was 94. The facility did not have a policy on certification of nurse aides. 1. Review of the facility Nurse Aide Training Log showed NA D's date of hire was February 2021 (no specific day noted). He/She began NA responsibilities on 4/3/22. NA D enrolled in a nurse aide training program in March 2023 (within a few days of the 7th). There was no documentation to show if the training was complete or if NA D was certified. During interview on 8/21/23 at 3:00 P.M. NA D said he/she had been employed at the facility as an NA for seven months. He/She had completed the online course and could test soon. 2. Review of the facility Nurse Aide Training Log showed NA E's date of hire was 12/19/22 (he/she had previously been employed with a hire date of 8/8/19). NA E enrolled in a nurse aide training program on March 7th, 2023. There was no documentation to show if the training was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve bread and butter for any resident as directed in the approved menu. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility policy Requirements for Dietary, dated 11/28/16, showed menus must be followed. Review of the menu for the noontime meal on 12/10/19 showed staff was to serve spaghetti and meatballs, steamed vegetables, pineapple upside down cake, and bread and butter. Observations on 12/10/19 between 11:28 A.M. and 1:03 P.M. showed staff served meal trays to all the residents. Staff did not serve bread and butter to any resident. During interview on 12/10/19 at 12:46 P.M., [NAME] S said staff usually served garlic bread with the meal that was being served, but there was none. During interview on 12/10/19 at 2:59 P.M., the dietary manager said it was just oversight that staff did not serve the bread and butter with the noon meal. She expected staff to serve bread and butter if it is on the menu. During interview on 12/10/19 at 3:24 P.M., the administrator said he expected staff to serve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ovens were free of buildup and debris; failed to ensure the ceiling in the walk-in cooler was clean and free of a mold-like substance; and failed to ensure the serving trays were dry before storing them for use. The facility census was 59. 1. Observation on 12/10/19 at 9:43 A.M. in the both ovens showed a heavy buildup of debris on the bottoms of each oven. Observation on 12/10/19 at 9:50 A.M. showed the ceiling in the walk-in cooler had a basketball sized area that was covered with a black flaky mold-like substance. A three-tier cart with cottage cheese covered with plastic was stored below the area. Observation on 12/10/19 at 11:38 A.M. showed the serving trays had standing water on them. During interview on 12/10/19 at 2:59 P.M., the dietary manager said she was not aware of the build-up in the ovens. She would expect the ovens to be clean. The ovens were on a cleaning schedule and she was not sure if staff had cleaned them. She had been gone from the facility on leave. She was not aware staff was putting the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated three residents (Resident #9, #21 and #35) in a sample of 17 residents, and two additional residents (Resident #10 and #49) with dignity and respect when staff made inappropriate comments to residents during care and failed to provide meal service in a dignified manner by serving meals on Styrofoam plates with plastic silverware. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policy Resident Rights, undated, showed the following: -Residents shall be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and care of his/her personal needs; -All persons, other than the attending physician, facility personnel necessary for any treatment or personal care, or the Missouri Division of Aging or Department of Mental Health staff, as appropriate, shall be excluding from observing a resident during any time of examination, treatment or care unless…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of individual needs by providing a comfortable chair for 21 out of 23 of the residents on the secured unit, and failed to provide over-bed tables for two residents (Resident #21 and #258) in a review of 17 sampled residents and three additional residents (Resident #57, #26, and #28) on the secured unit. The facility census was 59. 1. During an interview on 12/17/19, at 10:41 A.M., the administrator said the facility did not have a policy on providing a comfortable chair or over the bed tables. 2. Observation on 12/11/19, at 6:57 A.M. in the secured unit showed the following: -Two residents resided in room [ROOM NUMBER], there was one dining room style chair (straight chair without arm rest) for bed 2, and no over-bed tables; -Two residents resided in room [ROOM NUMBER], there was one dining room style chair for bed 2, and noover-bedd tables; -Two residents resided in room [ROOM NUMBER], there were no chairs or over-bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the facility walls, floors, fixtures and exhaust vent covers in restrooms to be clean and in good repair. The facility census was 59. 1. Observation on 12/9/19 at 10:16 A.M. in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] showed the paint on the wall next to the bed closest to the door was was marred and scraped in a section that measured approximately 24-inches wide with exposed drywall. The wall behind the bed nearest the window was also marred with exposed drywall. Observation on 12/9/19 at 10:23 A.M. and 12/10/19 at 8:36 A.M., showed the flooring in the bathroom for resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was discolored and was yellow and stained around the toilet. Observation on 12/9/19 at 12:18 P.M. showed a 4-foot long section of cove base trim in the main dining room outside the dirty dish room door had come loose from the wall and lay on the floor. The dry wall was exposed and crumbling with holes in the wall. Observation on 12/10/19 at 10:06 A.M. showed unpainted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to use proper technique during gait belt (canvas belt placed around the resident's waist to assist with ambulation and transfers), transfers for three residents (Residents #14, #47 and #159), when the resident's did not bear weight, or bore only minimal weight, during transfers. The facility staff failed to employ appropriate methods for repositioning for one resident (Resident #14), when staff lifted and repositioned the resident under his/her arms or assisted to a sitting position by pulling on his/her arms and back of neck. The facility failed to properly propel two sampled residents (Resident #42, and #32) and three additional residents (Resident #2, #56, and #50), by transporting residents' in wheelchairs without foot pedals. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policy on precautionarymeasuree for gait beltapplicationn and usage, reaffirmed 4/6/17, showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess pain, provide PRN (as needed) pain medication, and intervene when the resident exhibited crying out during cares for two residents (Resident #27 and #159 ) in a review of 17 sampled residents. Facility staff also failed to accurately assess and document one alert resident (Resident #21)'s pain level. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility policy Pain Management dated April 6, 2017, showed the following: -All residents in the facility will have a pain assessment upon admission and quarterly and as needed to address and determine the following: presence of pain, origin of pain, if the pain was acute/chronic, frequency, changes in baseline behavior due to pain, acceptable pain level, identify the resident's current pain management plan of care, effectiveness of current pain management plan of care, and changes required in the plan of care to help lower the resident's pain intensity to no pain or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR), or document a clinical reason to justify the need to continue psychotropic (a chemical substance that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness or behavior) medications for two residents (Resident #21 and #40) in a review of 17 sampled residents. The facility also failed to include indications for psychotropic medications for one resident (Resident #17). The facility census was 59. 1. During an interview on 12/17/19, at 10:41 A.M., the administrator said the facility did not have a policy on psychotropic drug use and monitoring. 2. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/9/19 showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Received antipsychotic medication seven of the last seven days; -Received antipsychotic medication on a routine basis only; -A GDR has not been attempted and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policy Requirements for Dietary, dated 11/28/16, showed each resident shall receive food prepared by methods that conserve nutrition value, flavor and appearance; food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and a safe and appetizing temperature. Review of the facility's undated policy Food Temperatures showed acceptable serving temperatures for meats, entrees and vegetables was greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit, and temperature of hazardous salads and desserts was less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. 2. During interview on 12/9/19 at 10:28 A.M., Resident #12 said the food tasted terrible. There was no seasoning and he/she was used to home cooked food. During interview on 12/9/19 at 10:36 A.M., Resident #3 said the food was terrible and did not taste good. The food that was to be served hot was served warm. Cottage cheese had been served warm for the last week. During interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff washed their hands after each direct resident contact and when indicated by professional standard of practice during personal care for three residents (Resident #14, #47, and #159) in a sample of 17 residents; failed to ensure infection control measures were appropriately followed when staff failed to properly disinfect a urine soiled mattress prior to applying clean linen for one resident (Resident #14) ; failed to disinfect a glucometer (device used to check blood glucose levels) used for multiple residents according to acceptable infection control practice for four additional residents (Resident #22, #45, # 37 and #33); and failed to properly disinfect the rubber stopper of an insulin pen prior to medication administration for one additional resident (Resident #33). The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policy on hand washing, reaffirmed 4/6/17, showed the following: -The use of gloves does not replace…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer or administer eligible residents with the pneumococcal vaccine as recommended by the current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, for six residents (Resident #14, #21, #27, #32, #52 and #159) in a sample of 17 residents and five additional residents (Resident #2, #10, #11, #50, and #54). The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policy for Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations, reaffirmed April 6th, 2017, shows the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all residents residing in the facility are offered influenza and pneumococcal immunizations to prevent infection and the spread of communicable disease; -The resident or their legal representative will be told the pneumococcal immunization will be offered up on admission and a second pneumococcal immunization may be recommended after five years from the first immunization. The pneumococcal immunization will not be given if the immunization is medically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-17 · tag F0920 — patternProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate dining space on the secured unit where 23 residents resided. The facility census was 59. 1. During an interview on 12/11/19 at 3:00 P.M., the administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding dining space. 2. Review of the facility's census showed 23 residents resided in the secured unit. 3. Observation on 12/9/19, at 12:08 P.M., an unidentified staff member said, They are taking chairs out of the dining room, and we don't have enough to another staff member. Observation on 12/9/19, at 12:09 P.M., showed the following: -13 residents were in the dining room on the secured unit; -No chairs were available for other residents to sit down; -Resident #17 sat in a wheelchair; -Resident #37 stood in the corner playing a game, there was no chair available for him/her to sit down; -11 dining room chairs present and in use in the dining room; -Three spots available at the tables without a resident or chair that would be difficult to get to related to lack of space. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of a medical diagnosis that warranted the use of a restraint prior to initiation, assessment and monitoring for the use of physical restraints, including a pommel cushion (a cushion with an upward-projecting protuberance at its front part that prevents a wheelchair dependent resident from sliding down and possibly falling out of a wheelchair), a seat belt to prevent rising from a wheelchair and a low bed to prevent rising from a bed, that were implemented as interventions to prevent falls for two residents (Resident #14 and #32), in a review of 17 sampled residents. The residents could not easily and intentionally rise from a wheelchair or exit a low bed without staff intervention. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility admission packet showed the resident has the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-08-28 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post survey results and plans of correction in a location that was visible for residents and visitors to review, in the main building and in the locked unit. The facility census was 53. Observations throughout the survey, on 08/21/23 through 08/24/23, showed there was no evidence the survey results were accessible to the residents or visitors in any areas of the facility. Interviews during the resident council meeting on 08/24/23 at 2:00 P.M., showed the following: -Resident #12 said there were no survey results posted in the main building, and the only way he/she knew the results were through rumors: -Resident #47 said there were no survey results posted on the locked unit. During an interview on 08/28/23, at 2:14 P.M., the Administrator said the facility's most recent survey results should be posted and available for residents and visitors to view. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the results were located on the sign-in table at the facility's main entrance, but they were no longer in that location.
- No harm found · C2019-12-17 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to post required nurse staffing information, which included the facility name, resident census, and total actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift on a daily basis. The facility census was 59. During an interview on 12/12/19, at 9:32 A.M., the administrator said the facility does not have a policy for posted staffing. Observation on 12/9/19 at 11:05 A.M., showed staff did not post required nurse staffing information. Observation on 12/10/19 at 9:15 A.M., showed staff did not post required nurse staffing information. Observation on 12/11/19 at 2:46 P.M., showed the following: -A clipboard hung at the nurses desk and faced the wall; -A staffing sheet dated 1/3/19 on the clipboard; -No current staffing sheet posted. During an interview on 12/11/19, at 11:12 A.M., licensed practical nurse (LPN) A said the following: -Staff working for the day are supposed to be posted on the dry erase board; -He/She forgot to write the staffing on the board…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$42,680 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $42,680 — penalty dated 2025-05-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RICHARD J. DESTEFANE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 03/01/2018 |
| DESTEFANE, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2025 |
| ARSHAD, ABDULLAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/15/2024 |
| GRIGGS, ORLIVIAE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/16/2023 |
| RELIANT CARE GROUP OF WEBSTER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2010 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $869K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265423. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.