North Village Park
2041 Silva Lane, Moberly, MO 65270 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 183 certified beds · (660) 269-7300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0604, F0605, F0606) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 8 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 5 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (129) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $543,649 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-26)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.7% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 54.2% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 29.0% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 46.6% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.5% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.8% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 68.5% | 23.5% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.8% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.5% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.55 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.05 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 29.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.3–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 29.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 75.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.5–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.61 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 183 beds and averages 168.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.60 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.70 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
129 citations, most serious first. The 35 most serious are shown; the remaining 94 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #13), in a review of 16 sampled residents, was free from abuse by Housekeeper N. Resident #13 had diagnoses that included personality disorder (mental health condition characterized by long-term, rigid, and unhealthy patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving that differ significantly from cultural norms), major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychosis (a collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality) and severe methamphetamine use disorder. The resident reported to his/her emergency contact that he/she had observed Housekeeper N smoking methamphetamine (a powerful, illicit, stimulant that is highly addictive and can cause anxiety, paranoia, agitation, stroke or death and is typically snorted, smoked or injected), out of a glass pipe in a facility shower room, and the resident approached Housekeeper N about the methamphetamine. Housekeeper N then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained a lithium level (a laboratory test to monitor the concentration of lithium (mood stabilizing medication to treat bipolar disorder (mental illness) in the blood) for Resident #24 as ordered by the psychiatric Nurse Practitioner in October 2025. Resident #24 had a physician order for lithium 600 milligrams twice daily with an order start date of 09/20/24. Review showed Resident #24 was found in his/her room unresponsive on 11/24/25. The resident had vomited and was incontinent (abnormal for this resident). The resident's color was pale (normal color pink) and yellow. The resident's heart rate was 111 beats per minute (normal 60-100) and his/her oxygen saturation (blood oxygen level) was 70 percent (%) on room air (normal 95-100%). The resident was transferred to the hospital where he/she was found to have a critically high lithium level of 3.6 (normal is 0.6 - 1.2) and required intubation (a procedure where a tube is inserted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for a mechanical soft diet (foods that are chopped or ground to be easily chewed and swallowed to prevent choking) for one resident (Resident #8), who had a history of choking and was on an assist to dine program, when staff prepared and served the resident a regular diet tray including pork loin for the resident's lunch on 11/30/25. The resident choked while eating the meal and became unresponsive and stopped breathing. Staff began cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, an emergency lifesaving procedure that is done when someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped) and called Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The resident was transferred to the hospital where he/she later expired, with a cause of death of food aspiration (the accidental inhalation of food or liquids into the airway), respiratory failure (insufficient oxygen to the lungs), with unspecified hypoxia (insufficient oxygen reaching the body's tissues, vital organs or the brain). The facility census was 174.On 12/4/25 the Administrator was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight and a safe environment for one resident (Resident #1) who was assessed to be an elopement risk, had a history of a previous elopement from the facility, and resided on a secured behavioral unit. Staff allowed the resident into the exterior courtyard unsupervised, and failed to ensure the door was securely latched when the resident returned inside the facility. The resident went back out this unlatched door and left the premises without staff knowledge. Staff failed to complete hourly face checks on the resident from 7:30 P.M. until approximately 11:30 P.M. per facility policy. The resident was missing for over 12 hours before being located by staff. The facility census was 178. On 4/17/25 at 4:30 P.M., the administrator was notified of the immediate jeopardy (IJ) past non-compliance that occurred on 4/16/25. Corrective measures and an investigation began immediately. Resident #1's guardian, physician and law…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for one resident (Resident # 3) with psychiatric diagnoses, and a history of suicidal ideation, who lived on a secured behavioral unit, when the resident obtained a disposable razor on 7/23/24 from another resident (Resident #8) and cut his/her wrist several times. The facility census was 178. The Administrator was notified on 7/24/24 at 2:45 P.M. of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), which began on 7/23/24. The IJ was removed on 7/25/24, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Behavioral Emergency Policy, dated 6/26/24, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility to provide a safe environment and provide humane care to all residents; -Care will be guided by the resident's plan of care and based on the strategies taught by Crisis Prevention Institute non-violent crisis intervention, or the current company guidance, and will help to respond to difficult behaviors in the safest and most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for one resident (Resident #1), who had behavioral difficulties and required 24-hour monitoring and management and was at risk for elopement per the resident's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), and resided on a secured behavioral unit. On 3/15/24, Hall Monitor A left residents unattended in the gated courtyard during the 9:00 PM smoke break. Resident #1 placed a chair in the corner of the courtyard next to a 12 foot tall fence and used the chair to climb up and over the fence. The resident left the facility without staff knowledge and walked for approximately two miles, crossing a busy four lane highway intersection, then along an outer road before he/she was located at approximately 10:00 P.M. Staff were not aware the resident had left the facility until another resident reported at approximately 9:30 P.M., the resident had left. The facility also failed to consistently implement and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary physical restraint for three of 42 sampled residents (Residents (R)136, R70, and R31) along with implementing behavioral health interventions to prevent injury and excessive force and failed to investigate emergency events that led to an injury for R136. The census was 178. Immediate Jeopardy related to this failure was identified on 11/15/23 and was determined to first exist since 07/11/23 when the facility failed to ensure R136 wasn't physically restrained while sustaining an injury. On 11/15/23 at 5:31 PM, the facility's Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. The facility Administrator was notified the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 11/20/23. After the immediacy removal, the noncompliance remained at a D scope and severity level. The facility census was 179. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Restraints Policy dated 01/05/23, indicated it is the policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure chemical restraints were not used unless medically necessary for two of 42 sampled residents (Residents (R)31 and R70). As needed intramuscular injections of psychotropic medication were administered to both residents while physically restraining them and without their willing consent. The residents were exhibiting behaviors, however facility staff did not first attempt to utilize the residents' assessed and care planned de-escalation techniques to calm them down. The facility's failure to ensure all appropriate non-pharmacological interventions were attempted for R31 and R70 prior to the administration of as needed injections of psychotropic medication, increased the likelihood of the residents experiencing serious physical and/or psychosocial harm related to being chemically restrained. The census was 178. Immediate Jeopardy related to this failure was identified on 11/15/23 and was determined to first exist since 11/13/23. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement behavioral health interventions to ensure the physical and psychosocial well-being of four of 42 sample residents (Resident (R)120, R136, R70, and R31). The facility failed to assess R120's mental health status after the resident was found with a cord wrapped around his/her neck and later the same day was found appearing non-responsive requiring an emergency code to be called. The facility failed to update the resident's care plan interventions to ensure adequate monitoring, ensure pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions were implemented and failed to ensure staff working with the resident were aware of the resident's current behavioral support needs. The facility failed to ensure behavioral health interventions were care planned and implemented for three residents resulting in injury and excessive physical force for three residents (Residents (R)136, R70, and R31) and forced use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 28. Review of Resident #62's Care Plan, dated 10/17/19, showed the resident is able to propel himself/herself in his/her wheelchair without difficulty. The resident is a fall risk. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease; -Required supervision and set up for transfers and locomotion on and off the unit; -Required limited physical assistance of one staff member for bed mobility. Observation on 3/31/21, at 11:45 A.M., showed the following: -The resident sat in his/her wheelchair in the dining room on Homestead; -CMT YY propelled the resident down the hall to his/her room; -The resident's feet slid along the floor; -The resident's wheelchair did not have foot pedals. Observation on 3/31/21, at 5:45 P.M., showed the following: -The resident sat in his/her wheelchair by the door to Homestead; -CNA TT propelled the resident through the door and down the hall to the Meadowbrook dining room; -The resident's feet slid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of 42 sampled residents, was free from abuse when Resident #2 struck Resident #1 in the head and face with a closed fist after pinning Resident #1 against the wall in their shared bedroom. Resident #1 sustained injuries including pain, two chipped lower teeth, a laceration to his/her lower lip, and lost a tooth, which required medical treatment. The facility census was 165. The administrator was notified of the past noncompliance on 03/26/26, which occurred on 03/14/26. After the incident on 03/14/26, the facility moved Resident #2 from the shared room to another secured unit, provided one-on-one monitoring for Resident #2, began an investigation of the incident, identified the root cause of the abuse, and in-serviced staff on the facility abuse policy and vape pen (a handheld electronic device used to inhale vapor, commonly containing nicotine) expectations per education, which began for those currently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident, (Resident #1), in a review of eight sampled residents, was free from abuse when Resident #2 pushed Resident #1 to the ground and kicked Resident #1's head while Resident #1 was down. Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room for right arm pain and was diagnosed with a nondisplaced spiral fracture of the right humerus (a spiral break in the upper arm). The facility census was 174. The administrator was notified of the past noncompliance on 12/04/25, which occurred on 11/28/25. Immediately after the incident, the facility placed Resident #2 on one-on-one monitoring. The facility began their investigation into the allegation and in-serviced staff on duty at the time on abuse, behavioral health services and behavioral emergency policies. Behavioral mediation agreements were completed with both residents. All other staff were to be in-serviced before the start of their next shift. Resident #1 was sent out for medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident, (Resident #2), in a review of seven sampled residents, was free from abuse when Resident #3 attempted to strike Resident #2, then grabbed Resident #2 by the hair and pulled him/her to the ground causing Resident #2 to strike her head on the ground, and then striking the resident in his/her side. Resident #2 was sent to the emergency room for a closed head injury after he/she developed a large knot on his/her head. The resident experienced headaches, a bruised knot on his/her forehead, a black eye, a bruise on his/her right hip, and rib pain. The facility census was 176. The administrator was notified of the past noncompliance on 12/04/25, which occurred on 11/12/25. After the incident on 11/12/25, the facility put Resident #3 on one-on-one monitoring, initiated an investigation, and began in-servicing staff on abuse. The facility continued staff inservicing before staff started their next shift. This deficiency was corrected on 11/16/25.Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident with mental disorders (Resident #3) of 22 sampled residents, received individualized treatment and services to meet the resident's needs. The facility failed to implement interventions consistent with Resident #3's plan of care to address his/her behaviors and psychosocial needs. The resident refused medications off and on for a few months and became easily irritated and aggressive. This resulted in verbal and physical altercations with other residents. On 8/10/25, the resident threatened a staff member and another resident got involved. A physical altercation occurred between the two residents and Resident #3 sustained a fracture of the medial orbital wall (eye socket nearest the nose) on the right side. Staff failed to consistently identify the root cause for the resident's behaviors and implement interventions to meet the resident's psychosocial needs. The facility census was 174.Review of the facility policy Behavioral Health Services, dated 10/13/24, showed the following:-The purpose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident, Resident #5, in a review of 17 sampled residents, was free from abuse when staff physically took the resident down to the ground and caused injury. The resident sustained injuries including a bruised chin, a swollen sprained right ankle, and bruising to the right knee. The resident felt staff abused him/her. The facility census was 177. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, last revised 06/12/24, showed the following:-Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish which can include staff to resident and resident to resident altercations;-Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish;-Physical abuse: Purposefully beating, striking, wounding, or injuring any resident or any manner whatsoever mistreating or maltreating a resident in a brutal or inhumane manner;-Physical abuse includes handling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and administer medications for three residents (Resident #15, #12, and #17) in a review of 17 residents. Resident #15 had diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) and missed several doses of medications for fluid retention prior to a hospitalization for fluid overload. Resident #12 experienced increased pain from missing ordered pain medications. The facility reported their pharmacy had not supplied the medications. Many of the medications were available in the facility's eKit (emergency medication supply), but staff did not use the available medications to ensure resident's received administration of ordered medications. The facility census was 177. Review of the facility's policy Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders, dated 05/18/24, showed the following:-The purpose of this policy is to outline procedures in accurately transcribing physician's orders and to ensure that all physicians' orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to recognize behavior triggers and provide early interventions of coping skills for two residents (Residents #13 and #14), in a review of 17 sampled residents, with mental disorders and who lived on a secured behavioral unit. Staff witnessed both residents in an argument during a smoke break and did not intervene or initiate coping skills. The residents left the smoke room and a verbal altercation ensued which led to a physical altercation where the residents hit each other. Resident #13 hit Resident #14 over the head with a laptop computer. Resident #14 obtained a laceration to his/her nose, a swollen and bruised eye, and an abrasion over his/her eyebrow. Resident #13 sustained a laceration on his/her finger. The facility census was 177. Review of the facility's Behavioral Emergency Policy, dated 06/26/24, showed the following:-The facility is to provide safe treatment and humane care to the resident in a behavioral crisis;-The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #10), in a review of 18 sampled residents, received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. Staff failed to assess and obtain treatment for seven days following the resident's complaints of urinary urgency (a sudden and strong need to urinate) and dysuria (difficulty urinating) and failed to obtain a urinalysis (a diagnostic laboratory procedure used to determine urinary changes and infection) as ordered by the physician. The resident was admitted to the hospital with acute pyelonephritis (a bacterial infection of the kidneys that caused inflammation. A severe urinary tract infection), and complicated urinary tract infection. Upon readmission staff failed to obtain and administer four doses of the physician ordered antibiotic for the resident. The facility census was 181. Review of the facility policy Notification of Changes, dated 5/14/24, showed the following: -The purpose was to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2) in a review of 13 sampled residents, who was monitored one on one by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) F, was free from abuse when Resident #1 entered Resident #2's room and started a verbal argument. The verbal argument escalated and CNA F did not intervene. Resident #1 hit Resident #2 in the head and neck repeatedly with a closed fist which resulted in the resident being sent to the hospital where he/she was diagnosed with a neck contusion (bruising). Resident #2 remained fearful and scared of Resident #1 and was moved to another hall for his/her safety. The facility census was 178. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect policy, dated 6/12/24, showed the following: -Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations; -Physical abuse is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #4) of 13 sampled residents, with mental disorders who lived on a secured locked unit, received individualized treatment and services to meet the resident's needs. The facility failed to ensure the resident received timely and appropriate treatment or services, including administering medications that were prescribed by the physician. The facility census was 178. Review of the facility policy Behavioral Health Services, dated 6/26/24, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility to ensure all residents receive necessary behavioral health services to assist them in reaching and maintaining their highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning; -Behavioral health encompasses a resident's whole emotional and mental well-being, which includes, but is not limited to, the prevention and treatment of mental and substance use disorders, psychosocial adjustment difficulty, and trauma or post-traumatic stress disorders; -Staff will monitor the resident closely for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #5), of 14 sampled residents, received necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident #5 had a left breast needle biopsy (a diagnostic procedure used to investigate masses or lumps) completed on 6/8/23 after a mass was found. The facility failed to follow up and report the biopsy results to the physician until 2/5/24, approximately eight months after the needle biopsy was completed. The biopsy results indicated infiltering duct adenocarcinoma (the most common form of breast cancer and if caught and treated early the survival rate is high). The facility also failed to ensure the resident attended a scheduled follow up appointment with the resident's oncologist to discuss his/her treatment plan.The facility census was 175. Review of the facility's policy, Transcription of Orders/Following Physician Orders, last revised 9/20/23, showed the following: -The purpose of the procedure is to outline procedures in accurately transcribing physician's orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2), in a review of nine sampled residents, remained free from abuse. On 8/15/23, Resident #1 and Resident #3 were in a verbal dispute. Resident #1 expressed being fearful of Resident #3. Resident #1 was placed on one on one monitoring with staff for his/her safety. On 8/16/23, Resident #3 continued to make threats (wanting to beat Resident #1 up or kick his/her ass) towards Resident #1. Resident #3 ran into Resident #1's room, shoved and struck the staff member providing the one on one monitoring, and struck Resident #1 multiples times in the head and body. Resident #1 sustained a concussion (a brain injury from a hard, direct hit (trauma) to your head or body, healing from this injury can take time) and hand contusion (deep bruise to the hand, as a result to a blunt injury to tissues and muscle fibers under the skin). On 8/17/23, Resident #2 and Resident #4 got in to a disagreement over beads while in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure additional resident (Resident #48), was free from abuse, including mental anguish, when staff refused to allow the resident to smoke if he/she did not feed him/herself meals. The resident had tremors in his/her hands and arms and required assistance to eat. The smoking restriction had no basis and caused the resident to feel awful and to go hungry. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure sampled resident, Resident #141, was free from abuse when Resident #2 hit him/her on the head with a porcelain toilet tank lid. The resident sustained two lacerations and three facial fractures as a result. In addition, the facility failed to keep residents free from abuse when one resident (Residents #43) of 65 sampled residents and an additional resident (Resident #379), who resided on locked behavioral units, obtained alcohol and marijuana from staff. Resident #379 tested positive for marijuana on 12/8/20 and resident #43 tested positive for alcohol.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's weight loss policy for weekly weights, re-evaluation of the care plan and interventions with continued weight loss, notification of the physician for continued weight loss, and failed to provide assistance with eating for one sampled resident (Resident #32) of 65 sampled residents, who had a 10% weight loss in one month and one additional resident (Resident #48) who had a 22% weight loss in six months. The facility staff also failed to re-evaluate the resident's care plan for weight loss, provide adaptive equipment, provide assistance, and provide desserts and all items on the menu for a diabetic resident (Resident #62), who had significant weight loss in the previous six months. The facility also failed to ensure two sampled residents (Residents #172 and #136) and four additional residents (Residents #122, #126, #8 and #25) received supplements as indicated on their meal tickets. The facility census was 170. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2021-04-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Review of email communication from the administrator, dated 4/14/21 at 11:11 P.M., showed there was no facility policy for block medication times. 2. Review of www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugs, showed the following: -Morphine sulfate tablets are an opioid agonist indicated for the management of acute and chronic pain severe enough to require an opioid analgesic and for which alternative treatments are inadequate; -Recommended dose for morphine sulfate tablets: 15 to 30 mg every 4 hours as needed; -Risks of addiction, abuse, and misuse with opioids, even at recommended doses; -Do not abruptly discontinue morphine sulfate tablets in a physically dependent patient because rapid discontinuation of opioid analgesics has resulted in serious withdrawal symptoms, uncontrolled pain, and suicide; -When discontinuing morphine sulfate tablets in a physically dependent patient, gradually taper the dosage; -Rapid tapering of morphine in a patient physically dependent on opioids may lead to a withdrawal syndrome and return of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for one resident (Resident #5) in a review of nine residents, when Resident #5 eloped through the service hall exit door without staff knowledge. On 2/25/26 at 11:32 A.M., Floor Tech A turned the service hall exit door alarm off, entered the door lock code, exited the door without ensuring a spotter (a second staff member to monitor the exit door while unalarmed) was in place. Floor Tech A did not reenter the building through the service hall exit door but entered through a different door later, leaving the service hall exit door unalarmed. On 2/25/26 at 11:35 AM, Resident #5 entered the service hall from the Hangout (supervised common area used by residents for activities and meals)) passed the vending machines (accessible to residents and staff), and attempted to open the service hall exit door without success. The resident returned at 11:50 A.M., pushed on the door handle and the service hall exit door opened. Resident #5 exited the facility to the back of the building, walked around the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a thorough review of one resident's (Resident #1) behavioral health emergencies and take steps to develop person-centered behavioral care plans to support the resident's changing behavioral health care needs. The facility failed to and revise behavioral care plans to include effective interventions for the resident. On 1/27/26, the resident was hospitalized after exhibiting behaviors including threatening another resident and throwing a wet floor sign, which injured a staff member. The resident was hospitalized and returned to the facility 1/29/26. There was no documentation of the interdisciplinary team meeting involving Resident #1, including steps taken to determine potential underlying cause of the negative behavior and steps taken to address, including reviewing and revising the resident's individualized care plan interventions based on that determination. On 1/31/26, the resident, who was assessed the day prior as not being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to convey resident funds within 30 days of discharge to the resident and/or responsible party for one resident (Resident #11), in a review of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 177.Review of the facility's Resident Trust policy, revised on 9/21/25, showed the following:-Upon the discharge of a resident, the facility shall provide an up-to-date accounting of the resident's trust account balance;-The resident shall be issued a check for all remaining personal funds in his/her account within five (5) days of discharge. The Resident Trust Clerk shall provide a complete accounting record of the funds along with the check. Review of email correspondence sent to the facility by Resident #11's guardian to the Social Services Director and the Administrator) provided by the resident's guardian, dated 11/25/25 at 10:16 P.M., showed the following:-The email served as a formal notice that Resident #11 would not return to the facility;-The resident's guardian requested a call back to discuss the funds remaining in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #7), in a review of 15 sampled residents, was free from sexual abuse when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B sent sexual content via text messages and pictures to the resident's cell phone. The resident reported he/she and CNA B had kissed and had a sexual relationship including touching each other's genitals. The facility census was 177.On 1/14/26 at 4:11 P.M., the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 1/4/26. On 1/4/26, the Administrator became aware of the employee to resident sexual abuse allegation involving CNA B and Resident #7. Upon discovery, the facility suspended CNA B, separated Resident #7 from the other residents to allow one on one time for the resident to vent and verbalize feelings. The nurse completed a skin assessment on the resident which showed no injury. The counselor, who provided bi-weekly counselling was notified of the incident. The legal guardian, physician, police…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain walls, flooring, resident sleeping rooms, resident restrooms, resident common areas, light fixtures, ceilings, shower and toilet rooms, plumbing fixtures, window blinds, heating/ventilation units, exhaust fans, and room fixtures such as call lights, soap dispensers, and paper towel dispensers throughout the facility to be clean and good repair. The facility census was 172. Review of the undated facility Resident Agreement (part of the admission packet) showed the facility will provide basic maintenance, replacement and repair to the resident's room as required by normal wear and tear. 1. Observation and interview on 12/08/25 at 6:18 P.M. in two of two public restrooms near the main entrance, showed a heavy buildup of fuzzy debris on both exhaust fans. The Maintenance Director said maintenance staff dusted all fans weekly. 2. Observation and interview on 12/08/25 at 3:21 P.M. in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] showed two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff did not securely seal, label, or date food items. Staff did not practice proper hand and glove hygiene and did not properly wear hair restraints in the kitchen. Staff did ensure personal beverages were not consumed in the food preparation areas. Staff did not maintain surfaces and equipment to be free from a buildup of grease and debris. Staff did not maintain range hood baffle filters free from an excess buildup of grease. Staff failed to ensure an air gap was present at the facility's ice machine drain to prevent possible backflow from the drain back into the ice machine. The facility census was 172. 1. Review of the facility policy, Resident Food Storage: Food from Outside Sources, revised on 11/28/24, showed the following:-Facility staff will monitor the snack refrigerators on a daily basis;-Refrigerators will be kept clean;-Food items will be dated after opening. Observation on 12/7/25 at 9:25 AM, in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow current infection control standards for two residents (Residents #14 and #4), in a review of 47 sampled and five additional residents (Resident #23, #110, #180, #172 and #72). The facility failed to follow infection control practices while performing blood glucose monitoring (also known as accu check, a procedure where a drop of blood is obtained to test the amount of sugar in the blood) for two residents (Resident #23 and #110) when staff failed to appropriately sanitize the glucometer (a machine that tests a drop of blood for sugar it contains) after use to protect against contamination. The facility failed to review their Legionella risk assessment, follow interventions, test residents diagnosed with pneumonia for Legionnaire's Disease, and retest water samples when an outside laboratory found Legionella pneumophila in water samples provided by the facility. The facility failed to follow infection control practices for Enhanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure checking account fees deducted from the resident trust account were replaced by the facility. This affected 127 residents for which the facility managed funds. Further review showed the facility failed to ensure residents had reasonable access to their personal funds. Residents were unable to gain access to their funds unless it was between the hours of 10:30 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. Monday-Friday. The facility census was 172. Review of the facility's policy, titled Resident Trust, last revised 09/21/2025 showed the following:-The facility shall allow the residents access to their personal possessions and funds during regular business hours, Monday through Friday; (there were no specific hours listed, and Saturday availability was not mentioned)-The facility shall keep an accurate and maintained accounting system for the residents that choose to have their personal funds managed. These funds shall be safeguarded by the facility, using complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund account and by not reconciling each month. The facility managed funds for 127 residents. The facility census was 172. Review of the facility's policy, titled Resident Trust, last revised 09/21/2025 showed the following:-The facility shall keep an accurate and maintained accounting system for the residents that choose to have their personal funds managed. These funds shall be safeguarded by the facility, using complete accounting principles;-A reconciliation of the bank statement, checkbook, and the Point Click Care (PCC) Trust Funds module must be completed monthly. This will be completed by the management company staff accountant responsible for the facility's financials. The reconciliation must be done by someone other than the Resident Trust Clerk;-On the first day of every month, the Resident Trust Clerk must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents (Resident #131 and #178) who participated in group interview, received mail on regular mail delivery days as identified by the United States Postal Service, including Saturdays. The facility census was 172. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, revised 09/21/25, showed the resident has the right to privacy in written communications, including the right to send and promptly receive mail that was unopened. Request was made for, but the facility did not provide a policy regarding mail delivery at the facility. 1. Resident council/group interview on 12/09/25 at 9:59 A.M. showed the following: -Residents said mail comes on Saturday, but was not delivered that day because there was no mail delivery on weekends;-Resident #131 said he/she would like to receive his/her mail on Saturday;-Resident #178 said he/she would like to receive his/her mail on Saturday. During an interview on 12/12/25 at 2:45 P.M, the activity director said the following:-Activity staff are responsible for delivering mail to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 94 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review the Nurse Aide Registry for a Federal Indicator (this indicator disqualifies an individual from working in the facility) for three of ten newly hired employees (Maintenance Assistant I, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) J and Dietary Aide L) reviewed. The facility also failed to check the Employee Disqualification List (EDL) for three of ten newly hired employees (Maintenance Assistant I, Dietary Aide L and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN H) reviewed. The facility census was 172. Review of the facility's policy, Screening-Applicant, Employee, Volunteer and Vendor, revised 06/12/25 showed the following:-Human Resources (HR) department will conduct pre-employment screens on applicants to determine whether the applicant has committed a disqualifying crime, is an excluded provider of any Federal or State health care programs, is eligible to work in the United States, and, if applicable, is duly licensed or certified to perform the duties of the position for which they applied;-Applicant shall complete a Request for Criminal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer discharge to seven residents (Resident #85, #113, #30, #38, #5, #6, #75) or the resident representatives, in a sample of 47 residents reviewed, that included the reason for discharge/transfer, location being discharged to, resident's appeal rights and who to contact for an appeal hearing request, the contact information for the Ombudsman, the contact information for the advocacy agency for residents with intellectual and developmental disabilities or the contact information for the agency that is an advocacy for residents with mental illness. Further review showed the facility did not provide a bed hold policy to one resident (Resident # 113) or their representative at the time of their transfer. The facility census was 172. Review of the facility policy, Resident Transfer/Discharge, Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave Policy, revised 4/28/25, showed the following:-With the exception of ceasing to operate,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for six residents (Residents #11, #20, #103, #179, #45, and #167), in a review of 47 sampled residents. The facility census was 172. Review of the facility policy, MDS 3.0, care assessment summary and individualized care plans, revised on 11/6/23, showed the following:-The purpose is to understand the changes presented by CMS for the MDS 3.0;-To define the intent of each section of the MDS 3.0;-To ensure that MDS 3.0 sections are completed accurately and in a timely manner by the assigned responsible parties;-The MDS 3.0 with the Care Area Assessment Summaries is a much more user-friendly assessment tool that addresses the wholistic person, including functional status, quality of life and individual plan of care to address and meet the needs of the individual resident;-Section K is to be completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update care plans to reflect current care needs for six residents (Resident #45, #4, #172, #14, #87 and #10), in a review of 47 sampled residents. The facility census was 172. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual dated October 2025 showed the following:-4.7 The RAI and Care Planning as required at 42 CFR 483.21(b), the comprehensive care plan is an interdisciplinary communication tool;-It must include measurable objectives and time frames and must describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being;-The care plan must be reviewed and revised periodically, and the services provided or arranged must be consistent with each resident's written plan of care. 1. Review of Resident #45's Care Plan, dated 05/13/25, showed the following:-The resident was on a regular diet;-Dietary department will monitor diet monthly to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for seven residents (Resident #24, #47, #118, #127, #113, #77 and #4) in review of 47 sampled residents. The facility failed to follow physician orders and obtain ordered bloodwork related to therapeutic medication level monitoring and bloodwork for five residents (Residents #24, #47, #113, #118 and #127). Further review showed no documentation the resident's physicians were notified when bloodwork was not obtained and/or documented as uncollected. Facility staff failed to obtain a blood pressure or pulse prior to administering a medication for high blood pressure, with ordered parameters on when to give the medication and when the medication should be held and not given for one resident (Resident #77). Resident #77 also had orders for an Accu Check (finger stick procedure to determine the amount of sugar in the blood) and insulin (injectable medication to treat diabetes and control blood sugars)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five nurse aides (NA) (NA T, NA U, NA MM, NA QQ and NA UU), who performed resident care, completed a nurse aide training program within four months of their employment in the facility. The facility census was 172. Review of the facility policy titled, Nurse Aide Training Program Policy, dated 05/18/24 showed the following:-The facility, with oversight from the Director of Nursing, shall be responsible for the coordination and/or provision of nurse aide education;-The policy did not include nurse aides completing a nurse aide training program within four months of hire. 1. Review of the employee roster provided by the facility showed NA T was hired on 07/19/23. During interview on 12/8/25 at 10:20 A.M., NA T said the following:-He/She has worked at the facility for two years;-He/She worked as a NA and provided care to residents.-He/She was currently in a CNA class. 2. Review of the employee roster provided by the facility showed NA U was hired on 10/18/23. During interview on 12/8/25 at 10:25 A.M., NA U said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food items to residents at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 172. Review of the undated facility policy, Food Temperatures, showed the following: -Foods will be served at proper temperature to ensure food safety; -Record temperature reading on Food Temperature Chart form at beginning of tray line and during the tray line. Take the temperature of each pan of product before serving; -Acceptable serving temperatures include: -Greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F), but preferably between 160 to 175 degrees F, for the following food items: gravy, casseroles, meat, entrees, potatoes, pasta, soup, pureed foods, hot pureed foods, vegetables; -Less than 41 degrees F: hazardous salads, milk, juice, and desserts; -If temperatures are not at acceptable levels and cannot be corrected in time for meal service, make an appropriate menu substitution and discard out of temperature range foods;-Cold foods need to be put in the freezer half hour to three quarter hour prior to meal service. Bring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served food items according to the menu for three residents (Residents #36, #127, and #135), in a review of 47 sampled residents, and for one additional resident (Resident #125), who had physician's orders for a mechanical soft diet. The facility census was 172. 1. Review of Resident #36's physician order sheet (POS) for December 2025, showed the resident had an order for a regular diet with mechanical soft texture (original order dated 11/20/25). Review of the facility's resident Diet Orders listing, printed 12/7/25, showed the resident had an order for a regular diet, mechanical soft texture. Review of the facility's diet spreadsheet menu for the breakfast meal served on 12/8/25 (Day 9 of menu cycle) showed residents on a mechanical soft diet were to receive ground sausage patty with gravy.Observation on 12/8/25 at 8:19 A.M., showed staff served the resident a sausage patty that was cut into bite-size pieces. (Staff did not serve the resident ground sausage patty with gravy as directed on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nourishing snacks when substantial meals were scheduled 14 hours apart. Multiple residents during the group interview said snacks were not specifically offered and were not substantial. One resident (Resident #167), in a review of 47 sampled residents, and three additional residents (Resident #83, #39 and #95) said snacks were not offered on a routine basis at the facility. The census was 172. Review of the undated facility policy, Snacks, showed the following:-Policy: Daily snacks are provided in accordance with the prescribed diet and in accordance with state law. Individual and/or bulk snacks are available at the nurses' station for consumption by residents whose diet orders are not restrictive;-Procedure: At least one serving or a minimum of two of the following four food components is offered for the bedtime snack:-Fruit and/or vegetable or full-strength fruit or vegetable juice;-Whole grain or enriched cereals or breads;-Milk or other dairy products;-Meat, fish, poultry, cheese, eggs;-Combo meat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement effective pest control measures to eliminate mice from areas throughout the facility, including resident rooms, the facility's dry food storage room, and nourishment kitchens. The facility census was 172. Review of the facility policy, Pest Control Program Policy, revised 05/14/24, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents;-Effective pest control program is defined as measures to eradicate and contain common household pests (e.g., bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitoes, flies, mice and rats). 1. During an interview on 12/07/25 at 11:50 A.M., Resident #118 said the following:-Mice were bad at the facility. A few days ago, a mouse ran out from under his/her bed and ran into the bathroom; -Maintenance staff did not check the mouse traps or rebait them. During an interview on 12/7/25 at 11:54 A.M., Resident #42 said the following:-He/She found a mouse in his/her bed;-He/She had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure staff completed weight monitoring, notifications with weight loss, provision of ordered supplements and reevaluation of the care plan for two residents with weight loss (Resident #45 and #103) in a review of 47 sampled residents. The facility census was 172. Review of the facility policy, Weight Monitoring Policy, revised 05/07/24, showed the following: -Purpose: Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise;-Monitoring weight: weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) or insidious weight loss (gradual unintended loss over a period of time)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one resident's guardian (Resident #1) of eight sampled residents regarding the extent of the resident's injuries and upcoming surgery after the resident was in a physical altercation with another resident. The facility failed to notify the guardian the resident was transported by ambulance to a hospital to be evaluated by an orthopedic specialist, or the results of the evaluation which showed the resident sustained a right humeral fracture (a break in the upper arm bone) that required surgical repair. The facility census was 174. Review of the facility policy, Notification of Changes, undated, showed the following:-The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his/her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification;-Circumstances requiring notification included accidents resulting in injury, potential to require physician intervention;-Significant change in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report physical abuse to the state agency and law enforcement for one resident, (Resident #2), in a review of seven sampled residents, when Resident #3 assaulted Resident #2. Resident #3 grabbed Resident #2 by the hair and pulled him/her to the ground causing Resident #2 to strike her head on the ground; Resident #3 then struck the resident again in his/her side. Resident #2 was sent to the emergency room for a closed head injury after he/she developed a large hematoma on his/her head. The facility census was 176. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, last revised 06/12/24, showed the following:-Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish which can include staff to resident and resident to resident altercations;-Physical abuse: Purposefully beating, striking, wounding, or injuring any resident or any manner whatsoever mistreating or maltreating a resident in a brutal or inhumane…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services for wound care for two residents (Residents #9 and #10) in a review of 22 sampled residents. Resident #9 was being treated for trauma wounds on his/her left foot. Resident #10 was being treated for diabetic pressure wounds on both of his/her feet. The facility did not adequately assess and document the condition of the residents' wounds, clearly identify the sites of the wounds, and failed to ensure the residents arrived at outside wound clinic appointments. Staff failed to complete dressing changes as ordered. Staff failed to ensure residents followed the non-weight bearing status as ordered by the physician and failed to notify the physician when the residents were noncompliant with physician orders. Staff allowed Resident #9 to cleanse the wound on his/her foot during a dressing change without ensuring appropriate infection control methods were followed. The facility census was 174. Based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use appropriate infection control procedures for hand hygiene to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infections for two residents (Resident #9 and Resident #10) in a review of 22 sampled residents. Staff failed to utilize the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including gowns, when providing care for Residents #9 and #10 who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). The facility also failed to post EBP signage outside the door and provide PPE near the room for one sampled resident (Resident #9). The facility census was 174. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use appropriate infection control procedures for hand hygiene to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infections for two residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2), in a review of 12 residents, was free from abuse when Resident #1, who was being monitored by staff one on one, entered Resident #2's room by the connecting bathroom and took a power strip cord, labeled with Resident #2's name. Resident #2 confronted Resident #1 about the missing power strip cord. Both residents' voices were raised and Hall Monitor A, the one on one staff, said he/she stood in front of Resident #2 to prevent him/her from entering Resident #1's room. Hall Monitor C entered the room to assist, pulled the power strip cord out from underneath Resident #1's leg and gave it back to Resident #2. Hall Monitor C left the room to locate a cord for Resident #1. Hall Monitor A said Resident #1 sat on the side of his/her bed rocking back and forth, looking down at the floor with pinched lips and appeared angry, Resident #1 abruptly jumped up, ran into the hall and into Resident #2's room, and punched Resident #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of two residents (Resident # 9 and #10) who resided on a locked behavioral unit when a physical altercation occurred between the two residents. Hall Monitor D said Resident #9 came at his/her with fists up and tried to attack him/her. Resident #10 told Resident #9 to leave Hall Monitor D alone. Resident #9 turned around and went after Resident #10 and shoved him/her. Resident #10 shoved Resident #9. The residents shoved each other a second time. Staff working on the hall did not have walkie talkies available, or a functioning intercom system to call a Code [NAME] (behavioral health crisis) to access help. Hall Monitor D had to open the locked door to the unit and yell for assistance. The facility census was 177.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of two residents (Resident # 9 and #10) who resided on a locked behavioral unit when a physical altercation occurred between the two residents. Hall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-29 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were employed with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for residents who resided on locked behavioral health units. Hall Monitor A was the only staff assigned to the [NAME] Senior 300-Hall when he/she called a Code [NAME] (behavioral emergency) for one resident (Resident #15) in a sample of 24 residents who was experiencing a behavioral health crisis in the outside smoke area. Additional staff did not respond to the Code [NAME] to assist Hall Monitor A. Hall Monitor A became upset, left the unit and left residents unsupervised. A resident-to-resident physical altercation occurred while Hall Monitor A left the unit unsupervised. The facility census was 178.Review of the facility's undated policy, Hall Monitor Duties, showed the following:-The purpose of the hall monitor was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of 11 sampled residents, remained free from verbal, mental and physical abuse when Human Resource Manager (HR) A cursed, taunted, threatened and grabbed the resident by the shirt forcefully, putting him/her into a chair. The staff member aggressively and forcefully shoved the resident against the wall during a Code [NAME] (behavioral emergency). The facility census was 176. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect, revised on 6/12/24, showed the following: -Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of staff to resident abuse. Two staff members reported Human Resource (HR) Manager A was abusive to one resident (Resident #1) of 11 sampled residents during a Code [NAME] (behavioral emergency). The facility did not interview or obtain written statements from all witnesses that were present during the Code [NAME] or review video camera footage of the incident. The facility census was 176. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect, revised on 6/12/24, showed the following: -Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight of one resident (Resident #23), in a sample of 25 resident, when the resident burned the back of his/her left hand with a cigarette during a supervised smoke break. The resident said he/she was mad so he/she burned his/her hand. The resident had a history of self-harm and burned himself/herself earlier in the year with a cigarette. The facility failed to ensure all residents' smoking materials, including a nicotine vape pen (also known as an e-cigarette, a battery-operated device that heats a liquid into an aerosol that the user inhales. The liquid, often called e-liquid or e-juice, typically contains nicotine, flavorings, and other chemicals) were collected from the resident and secured at the end of smoking breaks. Resident #23 was observed by the surveyor with a vape pen in his/her possession, twice on 7/1/25 when it was not a scheduled resident smoking time, and the resident was not monitored by staff. The facility census was 178. Review of the facility policy Smoking Safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served to residents was palatable and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 178. Review of the undated facility policy, Food Temperatures, showed the following: -Foods will be served at proper temperatures to ensure food safety; -Acceptable serving temperatures are: -Cereal, greater than 135 degrees but preferably 160 degrees to 175 degrees Fahrenheit; -Meat, entrees: greater than 135 degrees but preferably 160 degrees to 175 degrees Fahrenheit; -Potatoes, pasta and soup: greater than 135 degrees but preferably 160 degrees to 175 degrees Fahrenheit; -Hot vegetables, greater than 135 degrees but preferably 160 degrees to 175 degrees Fahrenheit; -Pastries, cakes, greater than 60 degrees Fahrenheit; -If temperatures are not at acceptable levels and cannot be corrected in time for meal service, make an appropriate menu substitution and discard out of temperature range foods. During an interview on 4/23/25 at 12:50 at 12:50 P.M., Resident #6 said the following: -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident #7 and #8) in a review of 14 sampled residents were free from physical abuse. Activity Aide A heard Resident #1 call Resident #7 a name and accused the resident of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #1's significant other. Activity Aide A did not report the comments to staff responsible for Resident #1 and Resident #7's care and supervision. Resident #1 went into Resident #7's room and hit him/her multiple times. The residents were separated. Resident #7 was sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Resident #7 returned the facility with a diagnosis of general assault. Hall Monitor D saw Resident #6 leave his/her room and heard the resident say his/her hand hurt from hitting Resident #8. Hall Monitor D stayed in the hallway while Nurse Aide H questioned Resident #6 in the hallway outside of Resident #8's room. While being questioned by staff outside of the room, Resident #6 went back into the room and hit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to ensure ordered medications were available for administration for two residents (Resident #15 and #17), in a review of 20 sampled residents. In addition, the facility failed to follow discharge instructions for pain medication after an emergency room visit for one resident (Resident #20). The facility census was 180. Review of the facility's policy, Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders, revised 05/18/24, showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to outline procedures in accurately transcribing physician's orders and to ensure that all physicians' orders are followed. To ensure a process is in place to monitor nurses in accurately transcribing and following physician's orders; -Upon receiving a physician's order via telephone, fax, written order, verbal order, transcribed order or other, it will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) in a review of 18 sampled residents, was treated with dignity and respect when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A tried to prevent the resident from taking a cup from the dining room back to his/her room. The resident attempted to take the cup from LPN A and the drink mix ended up on both the resident and LPN A. The facility census was 181. Review of the facility policy Dignity and Respect, dated 6/29/23, showed the following: -Every resident had a right to be treated with dignity and respect; -All staff would speak to and treat all residents with dignity and respect. 1. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan, updated 7/28/24, showed the following: -Diagnoses of depression, weakness and abnormal gait and mobility; -The resident had behaviors of agitation and anxiety, triggers of being yelled at and arguing. Staff should avoid triggering the resident. The resident's coping skills were visiting peers, watching television,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper serving size for residents with a regular diet order was given to each resident or an alternative vegetable given if the resident did not like the vegetable served specified on the menu. The facility census was 178. Review of the undated facility policy, Standard Portions, showed the following: -Uniform food portions shall be established for each diet and served to all residents; -Instruct all dietary employees in the procedures of standardized portions. The dietary manager will monitor the cooks and their use of portion control utensils on tray line. Dietary employees will follow the portion sizes listed in the menu binder. Review of the undated facility policy, Substitutions, showed the following: -Substitutions in the menu actually served, being of equal nutritional value, will be recorded directly on the menu, or on substitutions list and filed in accordance with licensure regulations; -Procedure: Substitutions of a menu item may occur when: 1. Item or ingredient is unavailable; 2. Items was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served to residents was palatable and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 178. Review of the undated facility policy, Food Temperatures, showed the following: -Foods will be served at proper temperatures to insure food safety; -Acceptable serving temperatures are: -Meat, entrees: greater than 135 degrees but preferably 160 degrees to 175 degrees Fahrenheit; -Potatoes, pasta and soup: greater than 135 degrees but preferably 160 degrees to 175 degrees Fahrenheit; -Hot vegetables: greater than 135 degrees but preferably 160 degrees to 175 degrees Fahrenheit; -Pastries, cakes: greater than 60 degrees Fahrenheit; -If temperatures are not at acceptable levels and cannot be corrected in time for meal service, make an appropriate menu substitution and discard out of temperature range foods. 1. During an interview on 6/20/24 at 9:49 A.M., Resident #2 said the following: -The food did not taste good and there was no variety; -The food was not warm when served; -He/She ate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) in a review of six sampled residents, remained free from misappropriation of property when Hall Monitor A took $40.00 of the resident's money by cash app (an electronic application on a cellular telephone in order to receive and send money electronically). The facility census was 169. On 5/15/24 at 12:40 P.M. the administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 5/8/24. On 5/9/24 the administrator became aware of the violation of misappropriation of resident money. Upon discovery, the facility suspended Hall Monitor A, conducted an investigation, and notified appropriate parties. Staff reviewed the facility misappropriation policy, and all facility staff was educated on the facility misappropriation policy. Hall Monitor A was terminated. The deficiency was corrected on 5/14/24. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect Policy dated 4/30/24 showed the following: -The purpose was to outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were employed with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for residents who resided on locked behavioral health units. The facility failed to ensure staff who provided one on one (1:1) supervision to residents were fully informed of the reason for the 1:1 monitoring they provided. The facility pulled staff from activities, laundry, housekeeping, and maintenance, away from their normally assigned duties, to monitor residents' smoking times and to provide 1:1 monitoring of residents who had experienced a behavioral health crisis. This resulted in the Hangout (common indoor/outdoor recreation area that residents from all units shared) being closed or monitored by one activity staff member which limited the times in which residents could access the area. The facility census was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents or their representatives had the right to participate in the development and implementation of the resident's person-centered plan of care when facility staff did not invite two residents (Resident #1 and #3) or the residents' representatives to routine care plan meetings. A sample of 16 residents was selected for review. The facility census was 178. Review of the facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans and Base line Care Plans, dated 1/19/22, showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the facility develops a comprehensive care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment; -A licensed nurse, that has been designated by the facility administration will coordinate each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals otherwise known for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0742 — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident #1, #2 and #11), of 14 sampled residents with mental disorders who lived on secured behavioral units, received individualized treatment and services to meet their needs. Residents displayed verbal and physical behaviors on multiple occasions. The facility failed to adequately develop and implement meaningful interventions, including non-pharmacological interventions, alternate strategies, or to ensure the residents received timely and appropriate treatment or services to address the residents' psychosocial well-being. The facility census was 175. Review of the facility's Behavioral Emergency Policy, last revised 1/5/23, showed the following: -The purpose is to provide safe treatment and humane care to the residents in a behavioral crisis, to outline steps to follow to correctly care for the residents in a behavioral crisis and to ensure that the resident is not being coerced, punished or disciplined for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility document review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen floors, walls, cabinets, and equipment were kept clean and in good repair; failed to ensure staff utilized proper hand hygiene; and utilized appropriate thawing methods in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 178 of 178 residents who received meals prepared in the facility. The census was 178. Findings include: Review of the Food Safety and Sanitation Checklist, dated 09/21/23 and signed by the Registered Dietitian (RD), revealed the temperature logs for the dish machine were missing the last several days, not all foods were stored off the floor, the microwave and the can opener were not clean, and the fryer was not clean. Review of the undated kitchen cleaning schedule revealed a section for the duty, date, employee name, and manager mange. All the sections were blank. 1. During the kitchen tour on 11/13/22 at 10:04 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM), the following observations were made: -The instructions for the dish machine revealed to wash at 160…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a water management plan was in place to prevent a potential Legionella (a potentially dangerous water-borne bacterium capable of causing pneumonia) outbreak in the facility of 42 sample residents. The census was 178. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Legionnaire's Policy read, in pertinent part, Most residents become infected (with Legionnaires' Disease) when they inhale microscopic water droplets containing Legionella bacteria. This might be the spray from a shower, faucet or whirlpool, or water dispersed through the ventilation system in a large building; and Prevention: Outbreaks of Legionnaires disease are preventable, but prevention requires meticulous cleaning and disinfection of water systems, pools, and spas. Review of the facility's comprehensive infection control program revealed nothing to indicate the facility had a program in place to monitor and prevent Legionella in the facility's water system. During an interview on 11/19/23 at 2:19 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident rights to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident for four residents (Resident (R)27, R47, R98, and R5) of five residents reviewed for choices of 42 sample residents. The facility failed to ensure a resident's right to smoke, unless medically contraindicated for R27; the resident's right to sexual relations for R47; and the resident's right to receive additional food for R98, R27, and R5. The census was 178. Findings include: Review of the facility's statement of Resident Rights, dated 07/05/23, revealed the resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside facility. The Facility must protect and promote the rights of each resident. Review of the Title XXXI Trusts and Estates of Decedents and Persons under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of facility procedures, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping and maintenance services were conducted to maintain a sanitary and orderly interior and to protect residents' property from loss or theft for five of 10 units. This had the potential to affect 100 residents on these units. The census was 178. Findings include: 1. Observation of bedroom [ROOM NUMBER] on 11/14/23 at 10:00 AM revealed a one foot by one foot stain on the floor in the entrance to the bedroom. In addition, the common room floor on 300 unit was very dirty with wheelchair tracks in the floor. None of the bedrooms on the unit, or bedrooms 302 through 315 had been swept or mopped. During an interview on 11/15/23 at 1:35 PM and again at 3:15 PM, the Director of Housekeeping (DHK) verified the stain on the floor, same size and description as stated earlier. The DHK confirmed the stain and stated the housekeeper for the unit mopped the floors each day. During an interview on 11/14/23 at 10:26 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of allegations of abuse for five residents (Residents (R)89, R137, R73, R21, and R31) of 42 sample residents. This failure could place residents at increased risk of abuse. The census was 178. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy, revised 01/05/23, revealed the facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or sexual assault including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the SSA. A final report of the investigation will be sent to the Department of Public Health/Department of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of potential abuse were thoroughly investigated for three residents (Residents (R)31, R89, and R137) of 11 residents reviewed for abuse out of 42 sample residents. The census was 178. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy, revised 01/05/23, revealed that once the Administrator or designee determines that here is a reasonable possibility that mistreatment occurred, the Administrator or designee will appoint a person to take charge of the investigation. The person in charge of the investigation will obtain a copy of any documentation relative to the incident. The investigation will include assessment of all residents involved and interventions to ensure protective oversight of all residents and involved residents in the Facility/ Interventions could include nursing staff separating alleged perpetrator and alleged victim including moving the residents to separate halls, physician involvement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an individualized and consistent program of activities for four residents, (Residents (R) 1, R59, R5, and R27), of eight residents reviewed for activities out of 42 sampled residents. Activities were not provided routinely for residents per their assessed preferences and plans of care. In addition, activities posted on the activity schedules in each of the facility's units were not provided per the posted schedule. The census was 178. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities Policy, dated 07/19/23, read in part the purpose of this policy is to ensure that all residents in the facility are provided an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with comprehensive assessment, their interests and their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and to ensure that an ongoing program of activities is designed. The Life Enhancement Director will monitor large and small group activities, 1:1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to follow menus for therapeutic diets, plan a vegan diet in advance, and serve substitutes of similar nutritive value for the facility and five (Residents (R) 428, R27, R4, R158, R59) of 16 residents reviewed for menus of 42 sample residents. The census was 178. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Dietary Menu Planning and Nourishment, revised 07/05/23, revealed the food and nutritional needs of residents shall be planned to meet the recommended dietary allowances as adjusted for age, sex, and activity, in order to provide menus that include safe and adequate intake of essential nutrients. Menus must be followed as written with the following exception: When ethnic, cultural, geographic, or religious habits of the resident population require a substitution. When substitutions are made, the replacement item must be: 1. Compatible with the rest of the meal, 2. Comparable in nutritive value. Plan and prepare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide bedtimes snacks that were suitable and nourishing for three residents (Resident (R)27, R85, and R158) of four residents reviewed for bedtime snacks. The census was 178. Findings include: Review of facility's policy, Diabetic Snacks, dated 12/12/22, revealed daily diabetic snacks are provided with the prescribed diet and in accordance with State Law. Individual and/or bulk snacks are available at the nurses station for consumption by resident whose diet orders are not restrictive. At least one serving or a minimum of two of the following four food components if offered for the bedtime snack: 1. Fruit and/or vegetable of full-strength fruit or vegetable juice. 2. Whole grain or enriched cereal or breads. 3. Milk or other dairy product. 4. Meat, fish, poultry, cheese, eggs. 5. Combo meat sandwiches. Review of the facility week two menu cycle revealed the evening snack included half cup of a fruit drink, one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the lids of two of two outside dumpsters remained closed. The census was 178. Findings include: Review of the 2022 FDA Food Code, dated 01/18/23, revealed outside receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnables used with materials containing food residue and used outside the food establishment shall be designed and constructed to have tight-fitting lids, doors, or covers. Review of the Food Safety and Sanitation Checklist, dated 09/21/23 and signed by the Registered Dietitian (RD), revealed the garbage containers were not covered when not in use. During an observation on 11/15/23 at 10:10 AM, the lids on two large dumpsters located behind the facility were open, exposing the garbage bags inside. During an observation and interview on 11/17/23 at 2:30 PM, two large dumpsters located behind the facility were observed with the Dietary Manager (DM). The lid to the dumpster closest to the facility was open and exposed the garbage bags inside. Trash debris was heavily scattered in and around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-20 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with facility staff, the facility failed to ensure two of nine total units had handrails on either side of the corridor. This has the potential to affect 41 residents on the 300 and 700 units. The census was 178. Findings include: Observation on 11/15/23 at 2:40 PM revealed no handrails in the main corridor between bedrooms [ROOM NUMBERS] for six feet on one side of the corridor. Interview with the Maintenance Director (MD) on 11/18/23 at 10:45 AM revealed he felt that due to a fire extinguisher in the middle of the six-foot section, a handrail was not necessary. Observation on 11/15/23 at 2:50 PM revealed a 14-foot section on both sides of the corridor leading into the 300 [NAME] unit lacking handrails. Interview with the MD on 11/18/23 at 11:00 AM verified the lack of handrails entering the 300 [NAME] unit. Residents were observed passing through the corridor on all days of the survey.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the rights of two of eight residents reviewed for physical abuse (Resident (R) 21 and R70) to be free from physical abuse by R73 and R85 out of a total sample of 42 residents. The census was 178. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy, revised 01/05/23, revealed VI. Prevention and Identification. The facility will identify and correct by providing interventions in which abuse, neglect or misappropriation of resident property is more likely to occur. This will include, assessment of the physical environment, which may make abuse or neglect more likely to occur, such as more secluded areas in the facility, the deployment of staff on each shift in sufficient numbers to meet the resident's needs and that the staff are knowledgeable of resident care needs. Supervisors should identify inappropriate behaviors such as derogatory language and neglectful care. Prevention will also include assessment care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure precautions were implemented to ensure one resident's smoking environment was safe for one resident (Resident (R) 48) of 42 sample residents. The census was 178. Findings include: 1. Review of R48's admission Record, dated 11/19/23 and found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Admissions tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizophrenia, and extrapyramidal and movement disorder. Review of R48's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 07/08/23 and found in the EMR under the Assessments tab, indicated a score of ten out of 15 which indicated R48 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of R48's Smoking Care Plan, dated 08/03/22 and found in the EMR under the Care Plan tab read R48 is at risk for injury related to being a smoker. He/She is a supervised smoker. He/She had a history of burning his/her eyebrows,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R) 20) of 42 sampled residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status such as usual body weight. The census was 178. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Loss, original date of 04/06/17 and revised date of 06/29/23, revealed a 10% weight loss such as this case requires notification of the physician by the Director of Nursing, dietician consult, orders to increase consumption, supplements, and increased supplements if necessary. Those residents that have weight loss concerns should be weighed weekly. 1. Review of R20's Diagnosis tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed diagnoses which included pervasive developmental disorder, unspecified attention deficit disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, histrionic personality disorder, psychoactive substance dependence, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and food in respiratory tract causing asphyxiation. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate and sanitary respiratory services for two (Residents (R) 172 and R86) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care out of 42 sample residents. Orders were not obtained for R172's use of oxygen and R86's oxygen tubing and concentrator filter were not changed or labeled appropriately. The census was 178. Findings include: The facility's oxygen administration policy was requested on 11/18/23 at 1:29 PM and again on 11/20/23 at 10:30 AM. The policy was not provided to the survey team prior to survey exit on 11/20/23. Review of the facility's policy titled, Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders Policy, dated 09/20/23, read in pertinent part, the purpose of the policy was to outline procedures in accurately transcribing physician's orders and to ensure that all physician's orders are followed. That a process was in place to monitor nurses in accurately transcribing and following physician's orders. Upon receiving a physicians…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of behaviors and side effects of psychotropic medications and failed to ensure risk and benefit review was obtained for administration of psychotropic medications for two of five residents (Resident R61, and R172) reviewed for unnecessary medications of 42 sample residents This facility failure placed these residents at risk for unnecessary medications being administered. Findings include: 1. Review of R61's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/16/23 located in the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R61 was initially admitted on [DATE]. Review of R61's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/16/23 located in the MDS tab of the EMR revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R61 was cognitively intact. R61 had a depressed mood, physical behavior toward others, and took antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain walls, floors, furniture, window coverings, doors, bathroom fixtures, mattresses, floor drains, shower rooms, main kitchen beverage preparation sink; and failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment through the facility. The facility census was 170. Observations on 03/29/21 between 9:50 A.M. and 4:40 P.M., showed the following: -The single-well sink, located next to the ice machine at the beverage preparation area in the kitchen, was not functional. The sink well was covered with gray serving tray. The drain pipe in the bottom of the sink was missing and was not connected. A stack of Styrofoam cups were placed on a section of piping under the sink covering up the open end of drain pipe. -In occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER], two 3 inch round holes in the wall behind the residents bed covered with dried, cracked joint compound and no paint. The bathroom floor was covered in a thick layer of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was free of a buildup of debris; failed to maintain the range hood to be free of grease and debris; failed to maintain the floor in front of the fryer to be free of grease and debris; failed to cover trash cans when not in use; failed to maintain the walk-in cooler at 40 degrees F (Fahrenheit) or colder; failed to ensure leftover food items were discarded; failed to ensure sanitary practices were used in scooping ice and handling ready to eat food items; and failed to ensure the can opener was free of a buildup of debris. The census was 170. Review of the undated facility policy, Ice Machine, showed the following procedures: -Daily: Wash exterior machine, use sanitizing solution and clean cloth, and allow to air dry; -Monthly: Remove ice, wash inside machine, use sanitizing solution and clean cloth and allow to air dry. Review of the undated facility policy, Hoods and Filters, showed the following: -Wash hood with detergent solution using a brush, sponge, or cloth; -Remove filters and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-04-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the administration of the facility failed to use resources effectively to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility census was 170. 1. Observations during survey from 3/29/21 through 4/15/21 showed the following: -No system for administration and tracking of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines; -No yearly staff education regarding care of residents with dementia; -Staff not following infection control measures consistently; -Dietary services not provided in a sanitary environment and not provided to meet residents individual needs on an ongoing basis; -Medication administration not provided consistently according to professional standards and without errors; -Pharmacy services and procedures not followed during count and control of narcotic medications. Antipsychotic medications not consistently reviewed and evaluated for possible dose reduction; -Behavioral health services to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-04-15 · tag F0841 — widespreadDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical director worked with the facility's clinical team to assure residents attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and failed to ensure the medical director participated and was involved in conducting the Facility Assessment and the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee. 1. During an interview on 4/12/21 at 4:30 P.M., the administrator said she became the facility administrator in June 2020. She verified the medical director did not attend the QAA committee meetings. During an interview on 4/12/21 at 3:58 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the following: -The QAA committee met monthly and staff gathered information for the meetings weekly; -The committee consisted of all department heads, consultants, laboratory, pharmacy, and they tried to include direct care staff as well if there was an issue in their department; -The medical director did not attend the meetings; -The facility sent notes from the QAA meeting to the medical director for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-04-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, maintain and follow policies and procedures for immunization of residents against influenza and pneumococcal disease in accordance with national standards of practice as indicated by the current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. Facility staff failed to administer pneumococcal vaccines when requested by the resident or the resident's responsible party for 21 residents (Resident #143, #83, #63, #6, #124, #159, #31, #9, #134, #100, #157, #175, #43, #138, #177, #27, #135, #45, #165, #69, and #8) in a review of 65 sampled residents and one additional resident (Resident #145). Resident #157 and Resident #45 developed pneumonia and were hospitalized . Facility staff also failed to administer influenza vaccines when requested by the resident or the resident's responsible party for 19 residents (Resident #143, #83, #63, #6, #124, #159, #31, #9, #134, #100, #157, #175, #43, #138, #177, #27, #38, #65, and #104) and one additional resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a manner that maintained their dignity when staff utilized Styrofoam plates and bowls, plastic silverware and disposable plastic cups for meal service. The facility also failed to ensure staff spoke to one resident (Resident #175) in a dignified manner; failed to implement interventions following incidents of smoking in unauthorized areas or when in possession of smoking products during unauthorized smoking times which did not infringe upon the rights of three residents (Residents #22, #130, and #152); and failed to post the residents' rights on each unit where it would be visible to residents. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, last revised 3/22/17, showed the following: -The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside of the facility. The facility must protect and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements, including written documentation of deposits and withdrawals from the resident trust, to residents and their guardians or legal representatives. The facility managed resident funds for 127 residents. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Trust, dated 3/1/17, showed the following: -A detailed written account of all transactions affecting each resident's trust account shall be maintained and made available upon request. All accounts shall be reconciled monthly. The individual financial record shall be made available by statements on a quarterly basis; -The Resident Trust Clerk is responsible for sending out the quarterly statements; -Make copies of all statements and date stamp them with a date they were mailed. Retain the copies for the facility files; -Statements should be sent to the resident and his/her guardian or legal representative. 1. Review of Resident #83's Trust Transaction History report, dated 11/1/20 through 3/31/21, showed the resident maintained a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely submit an accounting of residents' personal funds to the Department of Social Services following death of four residents (Residents #305, #306, #307, and #308), who received aid from the Department, and failed to timely return personal funds to one resident (Resident #302) upon discharge from the facility. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Funds, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Upon the discharge of a resident, the facility shall provide an up-to-date accounting of the resident's trust account balance and personal possessions; -The resident shall be issued a check for all remaining personal funds in his/her account within five days of discharge; -Upon death of a resident who received aid or assistance from the Department of Social Services, the resident trust clerk shall submit in writing on form MO886-3103 a complete accounting of the resident's remaining personal funds. This must be submitted within 30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — patternNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete required employee background screenings by failing to provide documentation of criminal background checks (CBC), employee disqualification list (EDL) checks, and/or nurse aide registry checks completed prior to employment for eight of 14 newly hired employees (hired since the last survey). The facility census was 170. 1. Review of the facility's policy and procedure, Pre-Employment Screening and Employee Screening, dated 03/2021, showed the following: -Human Resources department (HR) will conduct pre-employment screens on applicants to determine whether the applicant has committed a disqualifying crime, is an excluded provider of any Federal or State healthcare programs, is eligible to work in the United States and, if applicable, is duly licensed or certified to perform the duties of the position for which they applied; -Applicant shall complete a Request for Criminal Records Check and Request for Consent to Employee Disqualification Check Form. A criminal background check (CBC) should be done through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment and misappropriation of resident property were reported to the state survey agency immediately but no later than two hours after the allegation was made regarding three residents (Resident #43, #52, #152) in a review of 65 sampled residents and for one additional resident (#304). The facility also failed to ensure the results/conclusions of investigations from self-reported allegations were sent to the State Survey Agency within five working days of the incident for nine sampled residents (Resident #6, #10, #17, #43, #52, #63 #102,#152 and #169) and eight additional residents (Resident #3, #19, #57, #106, #139, #579, #679 and #680). The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy Abuse and Neglect last reviewed 7/2020 showed the following: Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of funds/property, to define terms of abuse/neglect and misappropriation of funds and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0637 — patternAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff, for two residents ( Residents #32, and #62), in a review of 65 sampled residents and one additional resident (Resident #48), within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, there had been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition which had an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status and required interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. The facility census was 170. 1, Review of the Long Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, version 3.0 showed a significant change is a decline or improvement in a resident's status that: -Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, is not self-limiting; -Impacts more than one area of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care consistent with residents' specific conditions, needs, and risks for five residents (Residents #31, #60, #67, #141, and #144), in a review of 65 sampled residents. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans and Baseline Care Plans, last revised 2/1/20, showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility must develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment; -A registered nurse (RN) that has been designated by the facility administration will coordinate each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals otherwise known for the purposes of the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff)/care planning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders and report blood sugar levels outside of set parameters to the physician and failed to administer scheduled insulin as ordered to one resident (Resident #178) with a hemoglobin A1C (test used to determine blood glucose levels over three months) last documented at 15.6 (normal range 4.1 to 6.1); failed to flush one resident's (Resident #159)'s peg tube (tube inserted through the abdominal wall for nutrition) before administering medications or enteral feedings according to acceptable standards of practice; failed to document accuchecks (finger stick blood test that measures the amount of glucose in the blood) were completed for three residents (Resident #56, #62, and #176) as ordered by the physician; failed to administer medications as ordered for four residents (Residents #52, #62, #157 and #180); failed to properly identify and label medications removed from their original packaging, and failed to document on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Residents #31, #32, #62 and #69), in a review of 65 sampled residents, and two additional residents (Residents #48 and #145), who required assistance with activities of daily living received the necessary care and services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy, Care of Nails (fingers and toes), dated 2/12/01, showed the following: -Soak the hands for five minutes in a basin of lukewarm water; -Scrub the nails gently with a brush and remove from basin; -Put hands on a towel, trim and clean nails, if necessary. A nurse is to cut a diabetic resident's fingernails. Review of the facility's policy, Perineal Care, dated 10/22/02, showed the following: -Purpose: To keep the female and male genital area clean; -Procedure: Wash your hands thoroughly before beginning the procedure; Apply disposable gloves; Wash perineal area with soap and water and rinse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] 7. Record review of Resident #85's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), dated 9/21/16, showed if the resident were admitted to a nursing facility, he/she would need services of structured socialization activities to diminish tendencies toward isolation and withdrawal. Review of the resident's face sheet showed the following: -The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident's diagnoses were autistic disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, mood disorder and major depressive disorder. Record review of the resident's care plan, revised on 1/20/20, showed the following: -The resident required encouragement and reminders to attend groups, he/she participates in the [NAME] of Focus(WOF) program; -The resident will express satisfaction with the type of activities and level of activity involvement when asked; -The resident will participate in activities of choice; -Modify daily schedule, treatment plan as needed to accommodate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion (ROM), received appropriate treatments and services to increase ROM and/or prevent further decrease in ROM. The facility failed to provide restorative therapy services for two residents (Residents #32 and #104) in a review of 65 sampled residents and two additional residents (Residents #48 and #51), who the facility identified as in need of restorative therapy services and who had physician orders for restorative therapy services. The facility census was 170. Review of the 2001 revision of the Nurse Assistant in a Long-Term Care Facility manual showed the reasons for providing restorative nursing included: -Follow basic nursing care measures to maintain present function and keep resident functioning at his/her highest potential; -Restore lost function after illness or injury; -Prevent complications of immobility; -Goals of restorative nursing were to keep the resident functioning at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate staffing and oversight to ensure residents that required staff assistance were clean and free of body odors for three residents (Resident #32, #62, and #69 ) in a review of 65 sampled residents and one additional resident (Resident #48). The facility also failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure medications were passed timely for two sampled residents (Residents #56 and #157). Additionally, the facility also failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure restorative nursing services were provided as ordered for residents to maintain or improve in activities of daily living (ADLs) for two sampled residents (Resident #32 and #104), and two additional residents (Resident #48 and #51). The facility also failed to provide adequate staffing to ensure safety during smoke time for one additional resident (Resident #145) which resulted in the resident rolling down an incline and into a fence. The facility census was 170.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0742 — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ten residents (Resident #6, #52, #138, #124, #152, #131, #178, #85, #102 and #169) of 65 sampled residents and three additional residents (Resident #94, #139 and #158), with mental disorders who lived on secured behavioral units, received individualized treatment and services to meet their needs. Residents displayed verbal and physical behaviors directed towards staff and other residents on multiple occasions. The facility failed to adequately develop and implement meaningful interventions, including non-pharmacological interventions, alternate strategies, or to ensure the residents received timely and appropriate treatment or services to address the residents' psychosocial well-being. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility's [NAME] of Focus Program: An Accountability and Responsibility System. A Comprehensive Care Plan for the Mentally Ill, Second Edition 2019, showed the following: -The vision of the program is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure inventories of schedule II controlled substance medication (substances in this schedule have a high potential for abuse which may lead to severe psychological or physical dependence) and schedule III through IV controlled substance medication were reconciled by at least two qualified staff to ensure accountability. Further review showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) YY documented administering narcotics to residents but did not document he/she had removed the medications from the medication cards and documented removing medications from the medication cards when he/she had not. The facility also failed to inventory a schedule IV controlled substance medication for one resident (#58) that requested the medication and was unable to be found by staff. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy Counting Narcotics between Shifts dated 7/31/06 showed the following: Purpose: To ensure that the residents receive their medications as ordered and to ensure that all narcotic medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Residents #31, #100 and #135) of 65 sampled residents and two additional residents (Residents #101 and #148) orders for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications (medications that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior), were limited to 14 days as required, except if an attending or prescribing physician believed that it was appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, then the physician should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. The facility also failed to ensure gradual dose reductions (GDR) (the stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued.), were attempted or the physician/psychiatrist documented the rationale for not attempting a GDR on antipsychotic and hypnotic medications for one sampled resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications with an error rate of less than five percent (%) for three residents (Resident #11, #65 and #69), in a review of 65 sampled residents, and for two additional residents (Residents #78, and #144). There were 55 opportunities with 12 errors, which resulted in an error rate of 21.8%. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration and Monitoring, dated April 2017, showed the following: -Medications are to be given per the physician's orders; -Medication error is defined as a mistake in prescribing, dispensing, or administering medications. A medication error occurs when a resident receives an incorrect medication, medication dose, dosage form and quantity, route of administration, concentration, or rate of administration. This also includes failure to administer the medication at the appropriate times or administering the medication on an incorrect schedule; -Dispense the medication, if time is specified, give medication as ordered on time;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when facility staff failed to date the label of multi-use vials of insulin when first accessed and administered insulin from the opened, undated multi-use vial of insulin. The facility failed to ensure outdated/expired medications were removed from the medication cart. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy Blood Glucose Monitoring dated 4/2017 showed no information regarding storage and labeling of multi-use insulin vials. 1. Review of the Insulin Administration Student Reference Manual, Revised 2001 showed the insulin expiration date must be checked on the vial. Outdated insulin must not be given. 2. Review of www.drugs.com showed the following: -Use opened Levemir (long-acting insulin medication used to lower blood glucose levels administered by injection) insulin within 42 days, discard any remaining medication after 42 days; -Store opened Lantus insulin (a long acting insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received food to meet their nutritional needs, and failed to ensure residents received condiments with meals/snacks. The facility census was 170. Review of the undated facility policy, Dietary Department Objectives, showed the following: -The purpose and scope of the dietary department is to provide a program that meets the nutritional needs of all residents. Standardized methods are practiced in the preparation and presentation of therapeutic and/or modified diets in accordance with primary care physician's orders. Consideration is given to the resident's physical, psychological and social needs. Recognition is also given to the patient's individual preferences and eating habits, which are sometimes influenced by cultural or religious background. The recommended standards are adjusted based on primary care physician's order; -Dietary department supervision is to be under the guidance of a full-time person qualified by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served to meet the needs of the residents. The facility failed to provide a spreadsheet menu that could be utilized by staff when preparing and serving meals, failed to follow a spreadsheet menu by not providing the correct portion sizes for supper on 3/29/21 for residents on a pureed or a mechanical soft diet; failed to prepare and serve all items according to the spreadsheet menu for lunch on 3/30/21 and failed to serve appropriate portion sizes to the residents in the Assist to Dine dining room. The facility also failed to post menus in visible accessible locations for the residents. The facility census was 170. Review of the undated facility policy, Cycle Menus, showed the following: -Menus are implemented by the dietary manager in conjunction with the registered dietician; -When changes in the menu are necessary, the changes must provide equal nutritive value. Menu changes are made on the menu (posted in dietary) for regular and therapeutic diets before the meal is served, or on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff prepared and served food at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility also failed to prepare and serve food items by methods to conserve flavor and appearance. The facility census was 170. Review of the undated facility policy, Food Temperatures, showed the following: -Foods will be served at proper temperature to ensure food safety; -Record reading on Food Temperature Chart form at beginning of tray line and during the tray line. If temperatures do not meet acceptable serving temperatures, reheat the product or chill the product to the proper temperature. Take the temperature of each pan of product before serving. 1. During an interview on 3/29/21 at 10:22 A.M., Resident #157 said the food was lousy. The hot foot was always served cold. Once in a while the food was warm; the residents got excited about luke warm because it was never hot. The eggs were watery, cold and rubbery. The vegetables were over cooked and mushy. The food had no flavor and was bland. During an interview on 3/29/21 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared to the proper texture and consistency for residents on pureed diets. The facility identified five residents on a physician-ordered pureed diet. The facility census was 170. Review of the undated facility policy, Standardized Recipes, showed the following: -Standardized recipes will be used for all products prepared; -Use standardized recipes provided with menu cycle; -The dietary manager will monitor and check routinely the cooks' use of recipes. If favorite recipes are added the recipe file, they must be written, standardized and approved by the registered dietician; -Recipes will have diet modifications noted. Review of the facility policy, Pureed Diet, dated 2017, showed the following: -The pureed diet is designed for individuals who have difficulty in swallowing or who cannot chew foods of the dental soft (mechanical soft) consistency; -The pureed diet follows the regular diet with alterations in the consistency of foods to a pureed consistency as needed; -All foods are prepared in a food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three sampled residents (Residents #69, #175, and #178), in a review of 65 sampled residents, and one additional resident (Resident #89), were served food items that accommodated their allergies, food intolerances and preferences. The facility failed to provide appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who chose not to eat the items initially served at the meal. The facility census was 170. Review of the undated policy, Dietary Department Objectives, showed the following: -The purpose and scope of the dietary department is to provide a program that meets the nutritional needs of all the residents; -Standardized methods are practiced in the preparation and presentation of therapeutic and/or modified diets in accordance with the primary care physician's orders; -Consideration is given to the resident's physical, psychological and social needs; -Recognition is also given to the patient's individual preferences and eating habits, which are sometimes influenced by cultural or religious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were sleeping or required assistance to get to the dining room were provided meals and were not omitted from meal service. The facility census was 170. Review of the undated facility policy, Tray Sequence, showed the cook and charge nurse will determine the tray card sequence based on the current situation. This provides an efficient sequence of trays for delivery that help to assure each resident receives his/her tray while the food is at the correct temperature. Review of the undated facility policy, Nursing Department Responsibilities at Mealtime, showed the following: -The nursing department is responsible for distributing food trays to all residents in the facility that are served in their rooms and dining rooms; -The nursing department is responsible for preparing residents for meals and for assisting residents who are unable to feed themselves; -The nursing department is responsible for distributing food trays…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0810 — patternProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide special equipment for four residents (Residents #38, #62, #157, and #165), in a review of 65 sampled residents, and five additional residents (Residents #7, #8, #24, #93, and #145), who the facility identified needed the equipment to assist with eating and drinking. The facility census was 170. Review of the undated facility policy, Adaptive Equipment-Feeding Devices, showed the following: -Adaptive feeding equipment is used by residents who need to improve their ability to feed themselves in order to enable residents with physically disabling conditions to improve their eating functions; -Procedure: Upon request, verbal or written, from dietary or nursing, a therapist, when possible, will assess any potential problems; -If the assessment indicates a feeding problem can be improved with therapy intervention (treatment and/or adapted equipment), a referral will be obtained from the attending physician; -Adaptive equipment will be provided by the therapy department. Equipment may be labeled with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met on a quarterly basis and included the appropriate attendees. Additionally, the facility failed to identify, develop, implement, monitor and evaluate system problems. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility's undated Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan showed: - Purpose: to provide quality excellence in resident care and do a root cause analysis for identified areas of concern and improvement; - The QAA committee will review data from areas the facility believes it needs to monitor on a monthly basis to assure systems are being monitored and maintained to achieve the highest level of quality for the organization; -The administrator is responsible for assuring all QAPI activities and required documentation is provided to the corporation.; - All department managers, the administrator, the director of nursing (DON), antibiotic steward, the infection control and prevention officer, medical director, consulting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 8. Observation on 3/29/21 at 11:37 A.M. showed Dietary Staff P worked in the kitchen and wore an N-95 mask below his/her mouth and nose. Observation on 3/29/21 at 11:49 A.M. showed Dietary Staff P prepared meal trays for the residents from the steam table. Dietary Staff P placed nacho meet onto tortilla chips. Dietary Staff P wore his/her N-95 mask below his/her nose. Observation on 3/29/21 at 12:32 P.M. showed Dietary Staff P assisted with preparing residents' trays during the meal service. He/She wore his/her face covering below his/her nose and mouth during the entire meal service. Observation on 3/29/21 at 2:31 P.M. showed the assistant dietary manager did not wear a mask at all while working in the kitchen. Observation on 3/29/21 at 2:32 P.M. showed the Dietary Staff M and Dietary Staff N did not wear a mask at all while working in the kitchen. Observation on 3/29/21 at 4:07 P.M. showed Dietary Staff Q scooped ice from the ice machine. He/She wore his/her N-95 mask below his/her chin. Observation on 3/29/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program to address roaches and mice in the facility. The facility census was 170. 1. Review of the administrator's email, dated 04/15/2021, showed the administrator documented the facility did not have a policy for pest control. 2. Observations of the facility on 03/29/21 between 8:50 A.M. and 4:20 P.M., showed the following: -In the 100 hall dining area, the windows were open and there were no screens on the windows. The back exit door had a three inch by four inch area at the bottom that was rusted away and daylight could be seen, the side exit door had a ½ inch gap all the way down the side and the door frame was rusted and daylight could be seen; -In room [ROOM NUMBER] the window was open and the window screen was torn at the bottom; -In room [ROOM NUMBER] there were mouse feces in all of the bedside table drawers; -In the 700 hall resident smoking room there was a ¼ inch gap on both sides of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide required in-service training for nurse aides that included dementia management training as part of the required minimum 12 hours of training per year. The facility census was 170. 1. Review of the facility Training Required for Facilities document, dated 5/2020, showed the following: -Training for Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) staff to meet 12 hours required training topics; -Hand hygiene; -Safe transfers; -Restorative nursing, bowel and bladder; -Back injury prevention; -Perineal and catheter care; -Empowering residents through Activities of Daily Living; -Infection control and prevention; -Oxygen safety; -Resident rights; -Handling aggressive behaviors; -Effective communication; -Fire safety; -Compliance and ethics training; -HIPAA; -Preventing, recognizing and reporting abuse; -Abuse and neglect; -Sexual harassment; -Workplace violence; -The Training Required for Facilities document did not include dementia management training. Review of the facility's staff in-service course completion history, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to create an environment respectful to the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives. The facility failed to administer medications per the resident's preference for two residents (Residents #176 and #143) in a review of 65 sampled residents. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy Crushing Medications, dated 1/1/2000, showed the following: 1. Medication tablets may be crushed or capsules emptied out when a resident has difficulty swallowing, or is a tube-feeder; 2. The following guidelines must be used when the crushing of the medication is necessary: a. The resident's medication administration record (MAR) must indicate the necessity for crushing the medication. 1. Review of Resident's #176's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff, dated 3/14/21, showed the following: -Diagnoses included Crohn's disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's guardian, emergency contact, and/or next of kin (NOK) after falls or changes in condition for one resident (Resident #179) in a review of 65 sampled residents. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights last revised 3/22/17 showed the following: 11. Notification of changes: i. The facility must immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and if known, notify the resident's legal representative or an interested family member when there is: A. An accident involving the resident which results in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention; B. A significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (i.e. a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications; C. A need to alter treatment significantly (i.e. a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment). 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #152), was free from misappropriation of his/her property, when the resident's tablet computer went missing shortly after his/her admission to the facility. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy Abuse and Neglect, revised 8/2018, showed the following: Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of funds/property, and to ensure that a due process for appeals to the accused is outlined related to establish actions related to the alleged perpetrator and to ensure investigation and assessment of all residents involved is completed. 1. Review of Resident #152's face sheet showed he/she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's inventory sheet, dated 5/22/20, showed the following: -Laundry staff documented the resident's inventory; -The list included an RCA Tablet ID-9903A-RC78873WR. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence that all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were thoroughly investigated for two of 65 sampled residents (Residents #56 and #152), and for one additional resident (Resident #82). The facility census was 170. Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, Grievance Procedures, dated 11/28/16, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility that every resident has the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. It is also the policy of this Facility that every resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, or mental abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion; -Mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of residents is prohibited by this facility; -This facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to, facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-15 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discharge notices included the resident's appeal rights, how and where to appeal, the ombudsman contact information, and the contact information for the advocacy group for mentally ill individuals for two residents (Resident #157 and #155) of 65 sampled residents when the facility initiated transfer of both residents to the hospital. Additionally, the facility failed to give a written discharge notice for Resident #157 and Resident #155 when the facility initiated transfer to the hospital. The facility census was 170. 1. During an interview on 4/15/21 at 7:30 A.M., the administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding discharge notices for facility-initiated discharges. 2. Review of Resident #155's medical record showed the following: -Resident discharged to the hospital on 4/23/20, 7/12/20, 1/14/20, and 3/23/21; -There was no evidence the facility provided written discharge notice to the resident or the resident's representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-15 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to assist one resident (Resident #63) out of 65 sampled residents, to obtain vision services when the resident's glasses broke. The census was 170. 1. Review of Resident #63's physician order sheet showed an order for the resident to have eye examinations, treatment and management, dated 11/19/19. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff), dated 1/14/21, showed the following: -Diagnoses included anxiety, manic depression, psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia; -Cognition was intact; -The resident wore corrective lenses. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 1/29/21, showed the following: -The resident wore glasses at all times; -The resident would have eye exams and treatments as needed or ordered; -Staff to assist the resident with maintenance of glasses as needed. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 2/20/21, showed the resident was in a physical altercation with another resident. Broken and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when staff failed to administer the correct dose of insulin (a medication used to regulate the amount of glucose (sugar) in the blood) per physician orders for one sampled resident (Resident #144) and one additional resident (Resident #24). The facility failed to dispose of one sampled resident's (Resident #165) and three additional residents' (Resident #11, #16 and #24) insulin per the manufacturer's recommendations and staff administered the expired insulin. Staff failed to obtain ordered insulin for one sampled resident (Resident #144) and borrowed insulin that had expired from other residents. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy Medication Administration last revised 4/2017 showed the following: -It is imperative that all medications are given using the seven rights to medication administration and that the professional caregiver ensures that medications are swallowed; a. Right resident; b. Right medication; c. Right dose;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-12-12 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey and complaint investigations in a place readily accessible to all residents, family members, and legal representatives. The facility census was 172. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, revised 09/21/25, showed residents have the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. The results must be made available by the facility in a place readily accessible to residents, must be clearly labeled, and the facility must post a notice of their availability. 1. During the resident council meeting on 12/09/25 at 9:59 A.M., 24 of 24 residents in attendance said they were not aware that they could see the results of the annual inspections/surveys or any complaint investigations. They did not know where the book with the results was kept. Observation on 12/09/25 at 2:10 P.M., showed the following:-Two white binders on a shelf inside the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-12 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to post required nurse staffing information, which included the facility name, the current date, the census, and the total actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift daily and in a location readily accessible to residents and visitors. The census was 172.Review of the facility policy, Nurse Staffing Posting Information Policy, revised 06/26/24, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information is readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time;-The Nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted daily and will contain the following information:- Facility name; -The current date;-Facility's current resident census;-The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift including Registered Nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2021-04-15 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the the most recent federal survey and abbreviated survey results and the facility's plans of correction in a place readily accessible to all residents and visitors to view. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 170. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, last revised 3/22/17, showed the resident has the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by federal or state surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. The results must be made available by the facility in a place readily accessible to residents and the facility must post a notice of their availability. During group interview on 3/30/31 at 2:06 P.M., ten of 11 residents in attendance said they did not know where to find survey results in the facility. Observations throughout the survey from 3/29/21 through 4/1/21 and 4/6/21 through 4/8/21, showed no Federal survey results were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-04-15 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a detailed facility assessment to include residents' acuity levels, the number of residents with special treatments and conditions, and the amount of assistance residents required for activities of daily living. The assessment also failed to correctly identify one resident who required specialty foods or nutrition services based on cultural or religious preferences. The facility census was 170. 1. Review of the facility's assessment, updated 3/30/21, showed the following: -Resident acuity levels were blank; -Special Treatments and Conditions did not include the number or average range of residents who required the listed treatments; -Assistance with activities of daily living was blank; -Mobility was blank; -Ethnic, cultural, or religious factors showed zero residents required specialty food or nutrition services based on ethnicity or religious preferences. 2. Review of Resident #175's Care Plan, revised on 3/20/21, showed the following: -Resident is on a regular diet; -History of requesting no pork based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$543,649 in federal fines across 12 penalties. 5 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $22,315 — penalty dated 2026-03-26
- $22,315 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
- $22,315 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
- $26,650 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
- $80,700 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
- $64,311 — penalty dated 2025-05-29
- $16,823 — penalty dated 2025-04-24
- $41,470 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
- $32,449 — penalty dated 2024-06-20
- $100,181 — penalty dated 2024-03-14
- $52,188 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
- $61,932 — penalty dated 2023-08-23
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-24 for 39 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-06 for 30 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-04 for 8 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-02 for 1 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-29 for 26 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| RC TIER PROPERTIES, L.L.C. | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/28/2018 |
| RCG INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/28/2018 |
| RELIANT CARE GROUP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/28/2018 |
| RICHARD J DESTEFANE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2018 |
| DESTEFANE, RICHARD | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/06/1998 |
| RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/18/2025 |
| ARSHAD, ABDULLAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/15/2024 |
| PAIS, ROYSTAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/02/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 97% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265330. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.