No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Milan Health Care Center

52435 Infirmary Road, Milan, MO 63556 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (660) 265-4032 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$49,897 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $49,897 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-22)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3300 E 10th St · (660) 359-3939 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
111 E 2nd St · (660) 265-3779 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
520 N Pearl St · (660) 265-3353 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
52350 Infirmary Rd · (660) 265-3969

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.1%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms49.1%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.0%17.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication41.1%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.8%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.9%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table55.7%23.5%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine18.2%63.5%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.452.111.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.782.331.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 7.6–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge16.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.0–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.781.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.19
RN hours/ resident / day
0.40
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
58.8%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 94.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.10 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-05)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight to ensure residents did not have materials to start a fire after staff identified a fire had been started in Resident #1 and Resident #2's room. On 1/12/25 at approximately 12:45 A.M., staff noted an odor coming from Resident #1 and Resident #2's room. Resident #1 said there was a small fire in the bathroom trash can that he/she extinguished with water. Staff noted a small amount of melted plastic in the bathroom trash can. Staff searched the room and found cigarettes in Resident #2's drawer, ashes in Resident #2's bed, and a cigarette butt on Resident #1's side of the room. Staff did not locate a lighter or any other lighting materials. On 1/12/25 at 1:07 A.M., the fire alarm sounded and at 1:09 A.M. staff observed Resident #1 walk up the hall. Staff noted a red glow and flames coming from the resident's room. Staff responded and found a box on fire on Resident #1's side of the room by the door. Staff extinguished the fire while other staff evacuated residents to the common area and called a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents, (Resident #7 and #10) were free from sexual abuse by one resident (Resident #11), in a review of 12 sampled residents. On 10/26/25 Resident #11 grabbed Resident #7's breasts over his/her clothing, without the resident's consent while they were outside in the courtyard. Resident #7 reported the incident to staff on 10/26/25 around 4:00 P.M. Resident #7 was tearful when recounting the abuse and reported he/she had never been grabbed like that before. Resident #7 feared being alone and Resident #11 coming around him/her again. Approximately four hours after the incident was reported by Resident #7, staff found Resident #10, who had impaired cognition, a diagnosis of dementia and who wandered in the facility, in Resident #11's room with Resident #11 around 8:00 P.M. Resident #11 and #10 sat next to each other on the bed and Resident #10's shirt was pulled up exposing his/her breasts. Resident #10's shoes and socks were off, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing (DON), who did not serve as a charge nurse, when the facility had a census over 60. The facility census was 86.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing (DON), who did not serve as a charge nurse, when the facility had a census over 60. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility Registered Nurse (RN) Policy, revised 04/30/24, showed the facility will designate a Registered Nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing on a full-time basis. Review of the facility's staffing sheets showed the facility did not have DON coverage on the following dates: -06/16/25, facility census 86;-06/17/25, facility census 86; -06/19/25, facility census 86; -06/23/25, facility census 86;-06/24/25, facility census 86;-06/25/25, facility census 86;-06/27/25, facility census 87. During an interview on 07/09/25 at 4:15 P.M., the DON said the following:-She had previously served as the DON, but during the month of May and June 2025, worked as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' needs for three residents (Resident #6, #7 and #8), in a review of eight sampled residents, when staff failed to answer the resident's call light in a timely manner, resulting in the residents' toileting needs not being met, episodes of bladder incontinence (loss of bladder control), and prolonged time the resident remained in a soiled incontinence brief. The facility census was 86.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' needs for three residents (Resident #6, #7 and #8), in a review of eight sampled residents, when staff failed to call lights in a timely manner, resulting in the residents' toileting needs not being met, episodes of bladder incontinence (loss of bladder control), and prolonged time the resident remained in a soiled incontinence brief. The facility census was 86. 1. Review of the Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of seven sampled residents, was free from physical abuse by Resident #2 when Resident #2 hit Resident #1 in the face with a fist multiple times. The facility census was 91. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, revised 6/12/24, showed the following: -Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations; -Physical abuse is the purposeful beating, striking, wounding, or injury of any resident or any manner whatsoever mistreating or maltreating a resident in a brutal or inhumane manner. Physical abuse includes, hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking; -The facility will identify and correct by providing interventions in which abuse is more likely to occur, such as more secluded areas in the facility and ensuring the staff are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing (DON), who did not serve as a charge nurse, when the facility had a census over 60. Further review showed the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of Registered Nurse staffing daily for two days. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility Registered Nurse (RN) Policy, revised 04/30/24, showed the following: -It is the intent of the facility to comply with Registered Nurse staffing requirements; -Full-time is defined as working 40 or more hours a week; -Charge Nurse is a licensed nurse with specific responsibilities designated by the facility that may include staff supervision, emergency coordinator, physician liaison, as well as direct resident care; -The facility will utilize the services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week; -The facility will designate a Registered Nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing on a full time basis; -The Director of Nursing may serve as a charge nurse only when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ceilings in the dishwasher room, dry food storage room, and above food preparation and serving areas were clean and maintained in good condition to ensure food items were not subject to potential contamination. The facility failed to maintain a drain air gap between the ice machine and the floor drain. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility's policy, Dietary Equipment Operations, Infection Control, and Sanitation, last revised 02/02/24, showed the following: -Ceilings must be free of chipped and/or peeling paint; -Ceilings must be washed thoroughly at least twice a year. Heavily soiled surfaces must be cleaned more frequently and as required. It is important to repair peeling paint areas as soon as they appear. 1. Observation on 3/2/25 between 2:50 P.M. and 9:00 P.M., showed the following: -A ceiling area approximately 2 feet wide by 8 feet long above the door inside the dry food storage room had moisture damage and dark stains; -The ceiling in the dishwasher room had cracked, chipped, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility staff, for four residents (Resident #18, #36, #59, and #79) in a review of 24 sampled residents. This assessment should have been completed within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, there had been a significant change (a decline or improvement in two or more assessed areas of resident status) in the resident's physical or mental condition which had an impact on more that one area of the resident's health status, or was placed under hospice care, and required interdisciplinary review and/or revisions of the care plan. The facility census was 98. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.18.11, Chapter 2, revised October 2023, showed the following: -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for four sampled residents (Resident #30 #33, #36 and #71), in a review of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 98. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, showed the following: -Medicare and Medicaid participating long-term care facilities are required to conduct comprehensive, accurate, standardized and reproducible assessments of each resident's functional capacity and health status; -The RAI process has multiple regulatory requirements. Federal regulations require that (1) the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status (2) a registered nurse conducts or coordinates each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals (3) the assessment process includes direct observation, as well as communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update and revise problems and interventions in resident care plans to reflect current care needs for four residents (Resident #18, #25, #33 and #54) in a sample of 24 residents. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans, last revised 10/31/24 showed the following: -The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment; -The comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's needs as identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The objectives will be utilized to monitor the resident's progress. Alternative interventions will be documented, as needed; -The Individualized Care Service Plan (ICSP), (also called the bedside care plan) will be updated with pertinent information needed for nursing staff on the floor to provide the needed care for residents. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff provided six residents (Resident #3, #11, #30, #33, #54 and #79), of 24 sampled residents that were unable to perform their own activities of daily living (ADL), the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene and prevent body odor. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility's policy for ADLs, revised on 05/18/24, showed the following: -The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. -Care and services will be provided for bathing, dressing, grooming, toileting and oral care; -A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the facility's policy for Peri-Care, revised on 06/29/23, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' needs for five residents (Resident #33, #54, #29, #11 and #30) in a review of 24 sampled residents. Staff failed to provide routine showers to ensure good personal hygiene, failed to provide restorative nursing to prevent decline in Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) and new or worsening contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). The facility census was 98. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 08/04/24, showed the following: -Federal regulations will require that facilities must provide 3.48 hours per resident day (HPRD) of direct care with 0.55 HPRD from registered nurses (RNs) and 2.45 HPRD from nurse aides (Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs), Nurse Aides (NAs), or medication technicians/aides); -The remaining 0.48 HPRD can be a combination of nurse staff (RNs, Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy to check temperatures during the meal service and failed to serve food items in a manner to ensure the food was at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility's policy, Receiving and Storing Food and Supplies, last revised 6/30/23, showed the following: -Record reading on Food Temperature Chart form at beginning of tray line and during the tray line. If temperatures do not meet acceptable serving temperatures, reheat the product or chill the product to the proper temperature. Take the temperature of each pan of product before serving; -Acceptable serving temperatures are: casseroles (greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit); hot pureed food (greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit); hazardous salads and desserts (less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit). 1. During an interview on 03/02/25 at 6:05 P.M., Resident #43 said he/she sometimes ate in the dining room and sometimes ate in his/her room. The food was not very warm when served. During an interview on 03/02/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff washed their hands after each direct resident contact and between glove changes, for three residents (Resident #3, #33, #79) of 24 sampled residents, failed to ensure soiled surfaces were sanitized appropriately, failed to ensure proper infection control was utilized for respiratory care supplies for one resident, (Resident #7), and failed to wear gloves when administering eye drops for one resident (Resident #25). The facility census was 98. Review of the facility policy, Hand Hygiene, revised on 06/26/24, showed the following: -Purpose: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility; -Hand hygiene is a general term for cleaning your hands by handwashing with soap and water or the use of an antiseptic hand rub, also known as alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR); - Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be as independent as possible when one resident (Resident #30), in a review of 24 sampled residents, who required a power wheelchair to be fully independent with mobility, was denied the assistance in obtaining a power wheelchair. Resident #30 was told by the administrator she forbid power chairs at the facility because they could hurt someone and that he/she would need to move to another facility if he/she wanted a power chair. The resident felt hopeless and discriminated against. Resident #11 had a power wheelchair, but said the administrator had threatened to take it away. The administrator said the resident failed his/her driver test and she was looking to take the resident's chair as she did not want any motorized chairs in the building. The resident's medical record showed no documentation the resident had failed his/her driving test. The threat of having the chair taken away made the resident feel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to assist two residents (Resident #30 and #55), in a review of 24 sampled residents, in attaining or maintaining their highest level of functioning. The facility failed to follow their policy to develop restorative plans with the problem, needs/strengths, measurable goals with a target date, specific interventions/task to be provided, frequency and duration of interventions/task, such as number of repetitions, length of time, or direction to staff to meet resident needs. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility policy, Restorative Nursing Program (RNP), dated 04/30/24, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level; -Restorative nursing program refers to nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse involving two residents (Resident #1 and #2), in the review of six sampled residents to the state agency. The facility census was 94. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect policy, last revised 06/12/2024, showed the following: - It is the policy of the facility to report all allegations of abuse are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within the prescribed time frames; -Sexual abuse is non-consensual contact of any type with a resident. Sexual abuse includes, but is not limited to, the following: -Unwanted intimate touching of any kind especially of breasts or perineal area (the area of the body between the anus (rectal opening) and the external genitalia-the male or female reproductive organs); -All types of sexual assault or battery, such as rape, sodomy, and coerced nudity; -This also includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of sexual abuse between two residents (Resident #1 and #2), of six residents sampled residents. The facility did not complete resident interviews with other residents following the incident to assess if they felt safe or had been subjected to or witnessed abuse and did not interview all staff present at the time of the alleged incident of abuse. The facility census was 94. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect policy, last revised 06/12/2024, showed the following: -Sexual abuse is non-consensual contact of any type with a resident. Sexual abuse includes, but is not limited to, the following: -Unwanted intimate touching of any kind especially of breasts or perineal area (the area of the body between the anus (rectal opening) and the external genitalia-the male or female reproductive organs); -All types of sexual assault or battery, such as rape, sodomy, and coerced nudity; -This also includes failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff safely secured one resident (Resident #1), in a review of six residents, in the facility van during transport. The facility census was 93. On 10/2/24 at 11:25 A.M., the administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 9/11/24. Upon notification of the incident, the facility completed an investigation and notified appropriate parties. The facility reeducated the transportation staff how to safely secure residents in the transport van. The deficiency was corrected on 9/11/24. During an interview on 10/1/24 at 11:15 A.M., the administrator said the facility did not have a policy for how to safely secure a resident in the transport van. 1. Review of Resident #1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, dated 7/24/24, showed the following: -Severely impaired cognition; -Required moderate assistance of staff for transfers; -Used a wheelchair for mobility; -Diagnosis frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder (group of brain diseases that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect two residents' (Resident #1 and #2's) of six sampled residents, right to be free from sexual abuse. The facility had not assessed either resident for capacity to consent to sexual contact when staff observed the residents touching, kissing and fondling each other. Resident #2 had a history of hypersexual behavior, was under guardianship and cognitively impaired. Resident #1 was under guardianship and had severely impaired cognition. On 4/28/24, staff found the residents without clothing and in bed together with physical indications the residents had been sexually intimate. The facility census was 89. Review of the facility policy and procedure, Sexual Activity/Abuse and Neglect, dated (origination) 4/6/2017, and last reviewed/revised 4/18/22, showed the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the facility provides protective oversight and care for all residents requesting to engage in sexual activity/intercourse while at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY ar reviewing Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of sexual abuse between two residents (Resident #1 and #2) of six sampled residents. The facility's investigation did not include interviews with other residents following the incident to assess if they felt safe or had been subjected to or witnessed abuse, and did not inteview all staff present at the time of the alleged incident of abuse. The facility census was 89. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect policy, dated (origination) 11/28/2016 and last reviewed/revised 04/30/2024, showed the following: -Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of sexual abuse, and misuse of funds/property, and to define terms of types of abuse/neglect and misappropriation of funds and property. To ensure immediate reporting of all abuse allegations to the Administrator or designees and the Director of Nursing or designee and outside persons or agencies. To establish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of discharge with the required information to the resident and/or resident representative for one resident (Resident #3), in a review of seven sampled residents. The facility initiated a transfer to the hospital, denied the resident readmission to the facility and did not find appropriate placement for the resident. The facility census was 89. Review of the facility Resident Transfer/Discharge Written Notification Policy and Procedure, dated [DATE], showed the following: -If a resident was transferred with the expectation of returning to the facility and the resident cannot return to the facility, the facility must follow the requirements for a discharge; -If you do not agree with the facility's decision to discharge you/your ward, you have the right to file an appeal on this notice to the Administrative Hearings Unit within 30 days of notice. 1. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-13 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to efficiently utilize staff to serve meal trays timely. Residents sat from 45 minutes to over two hours awaiting their meals. The census was 93. Review of the facility's meal times (provided by the facility), dated 06/05/23, showed the following: -Breakfast at 7:00 A.M.; -Lunch at 12:00 noon; -Supper at 5:00 P.M.; -100/200/400 hall hot cart after dining room; -300 hall hot cart after dining room at breakfast and lunch and before dining room at supper. 1. During an interview on 06/06/23 at 7:45 A.M., Resident #68 said he/she has to wait over one hour to get his/her breakfast. Residents have to sit and wait for one to two hours for supper. During an interview on 06/06/23 at 9:21 A.M., Resident #26 said he/she would like to have drinks while waiting for meals as it takes a long time (1 1/2 to 2 hours); During an interview on 06/06/23 at 11:16 A.M., Resident #50 said residents arrived in the dining room for lunch at noon, and staff didn't start serving food until 12:45 P.M. It was 2:30 P.M. or 2:45 P.M. before all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served to meet the nutritional needs of the residents when staff failed to prepare and serve food according to the diet spreadsheet menu. Staff also failed to prepare food items in accordance with facility recipes and failed to serve residents the appropriate portion sizes of food items as indicated on the spreadsheet menu. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy, Dietary Food Preparation, revised 4/9/21, showed the following: -Standardized recipes will be used for all products prepared; -Use standardized recipes provided with menu cycle; -Standardized recipes will be adjusted for therapeutic and consistency modifications; -The Dietary Manager will monitor and check routinely the cooks' use of recipes. If favorite recipes are added to the recipe file, they must be written, standardized and approved by the Registered Dietician; -Recipes have diet modifications noted; -Pureed recipes are found in the Recipe Binder; -The dietary department will ensure that food is prepared in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink items at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy, Dietary Food Preparation, revised 4/9/21, showed the following: -Foods will be served at proper temperature to ensure food safety; -Procedure: Record temperature reading on Food Temperature Chart form at beginning of tray line and during the tray line; -Take the temperature of each pan of product before serving; -If temperatures do not meet acceptable serving temperatures, reheat the product or chill the product to the proper temperature; -Acceptable serving temperatures are: -Meat, entrees: greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F), but preferably 160 to 175 degrees F; -Hot pureed foods: greater than 135 degrees F, but preferably 160 to 175 degrees F; -Hazardous salads and desserts: less than 41 degrees F; -Milk, juice: less than 41 degrees F; -If temperatures are not at acceptable levels and cannot be corrected in time for meal service, make an appropriate menu substitution and discard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff failed to properly thaw potentially hazardous foods in order to prevent spoilage. Staff failed to monitor for and maintain appropriate holding, storage, and serving temperatures for hot and cold food items. Staff failed to discard food that was expired or showed visible signs of deterioration, failed to store and handle food products to maintain quality and free from potential contaminants, failed to store food products separately from cleaning products, and failed to label and date opened food items. The facility also failed to ensure sanitary practices in the kitchen when staff failed to ensure food tableware and beverage containers were protected from moisture, debris, and other contaminants and kitchen surfaces and equipment, such as refrigerators, freezers, fans, vents, walls, floors, ceilings, cooking appliances, were clean and maintained to prevent potential contamination. Staff also failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop specific control parameters for addressing Legionella (a bacterium that can cause a serious type of pneumonia in persons at risk), based on Center for Disease Control (CDC) and American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) standards and failed to complete a facility assessment. The facility did not have a water management team, detailed water flow map, and did not implement the facility's Legionnaire Disease (severe pneumonia like infection caused by contaminated water) policy that instructed staff how to monitor residents for Legionnaire's disease. The facility also failed to clean glucometers as directed by manufacturer's instruction between residents for one resident (Resident #18), and two additional sampled residents (Resident #39 and #46). The facility failed to clean the rubber stopper on insulin vials, pens, and the administration site for one resident (Resident #18), and failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident #49, #59, and #89), in a review of 23 residents and two additional sampled residents (Resident #410 and #411), were treated with dignity and respect when staff refused to provide assistance, and verbalized rude and disrespectul responses to residents. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility's policy, Dignity and Respect, revised 07/09/2021, showed the following: -Purpose to ensure that every resident is treated with dignity and respect; -Every resident has a right to be treated with dignity and respect; -All staff will speak to and treat all residents with dignity and respect. 1. Review of Resident #89's face sheet showed his/her diagnoses include major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check the Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR) or a Criminal Background Check (CBC) prior to the hiring of five employees (Registered Nurse (RN) N, the Assistant Dietary Supervisor, the Laundry Aide, the Maintenance Assistant and the Transportation staff) in a review of ten employees hired since the previous annual survey, failed to conduct an Employee Disqualification (EDL) check for any Federal Indicators of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property for one employee (RN N) and failed to conduct a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry check for two employees (RN N and the Maintenance Assistant). The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy, Pre-Employment Screening,revised 5/9/22, showed the following: -Human Resources department (HR) will conduct pre-employment screens on applicants to determine whether the applicant has committed a disqualifying crime, is an excluded provider of any Federal or State healthcare programs, is eligible to work in the United States, and, if applicable, is duly licensed or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-13 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge to the resident and/or resident representative when three residents (Residents #48, #49 and #394), in a review of 23 sampled residents, were transferred to the hospital. The facility did not provide any other written documentation to the resident or resident representative of the reason and date for transfer/discharge, where the resident was transferred/discharged , ombudsman contact information, information on how to appeal a transfer/discharge, or how to contact the mental health advocacy group for residents with intellectual disabilities or mental illness. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility's policy Resident Transfer / Discharge, Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave , revised 07/12/22, showed the following: -Transfer and Discharge: Includes movement of a resident to a bed outside of the certified facility whether that bed is in the same physical plant or not. -Discharge After…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan consistent with the resident's specific conditions, needs and risks that provide effective person-centered care that met professional standards of quality of care within 48 hours of admission to the facility for four residents (Resident #80, #89, #91 and #394) in a sample of 23 residents. The facility failed to provide a copy of the baseline care plan to the resident/resident representative for six residents (Resident #80, #89, #91, #93, #394 and #24). The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy, Baseline Care Plan Rules, revised 01/19/22 showed the following: 1. The electronic medical record (EMR) care plan section has a baseline care plan library that you may choose from but you must individualize the plan of care for each resident; 2. All baseline care plan must be completed within 48 hours of admission. 3. The Baseline Care Plan must consist of the following resident information: Allergies,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five nurse aides (NA B, NA C, NA D, NA E and NA F ) completed a nurse aide training program within four months of their employment in the facility. The facility census was 93. During an interview on [DATE], at 3:11 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility did not have a policy on certification of nurse assistants. Review of the facility staff title listing, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Facility hired NA B on [DATE] as a NA; -Facility hired NA C on [DATE] as a NA; -Facility hired NA D on [DATE] as a NA; -Facility hired NA E on [DATE] as a NA; -Facility hired NA F on [DATE] as a NA. 1. Review of NA B's employee file showed he/she was hired [DATE] as a NA. The employee file showed no documentation NA B completed a nurse aide training program within four months of his/her hire date. 2. Review of NA C's employee files showed the following: -He/She was hired [DATE] as a nurse assistant; -On [DATE], job title was changed to hall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper administration of physician ordered insulin via an insulin pen for two sampled residents (Resident #18, and #50), and two additional residents (Resident #71 and Resident #52) by not holding the insulin pen in place for the appropriate amount of time per policy and per themanufacturer's instructions. Failure to follow procedure for adminsitration results in residents not recieving the ordered dose of insulin. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy Insulin and Insulin Pen Skill Competency Test undated showed the following: 1. Check for the Five Rights a. Identifies the correct time. b. Verifies medicine container matches the Medication Administration Record. c. Verifies the dose on medication container matches MAR. d. Verifies the medication is in the correct route identified on the MAR. 2. Check expiration date of insulin pen/vial. a. Check to see if the insulin cartridge is loaded into insulin pen. If not,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a physician order for a mechanical soft diet received food items with the proper texture and gravy/sauces to allow for foods to be easily swallowed. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy, Dietary Food Preparation, revised 4/9/21, showed the following: -Standardized recipes will be used for all products prepared; -Procedure: -Use standardized recipes provided with menu cycle; -Standardized recipes will be adjusted for therapeutic and consistency modifications; -The Dietary Manager will monitor and check routinely the cooks' use of recipes; -Recipes have diet modifications noted. 1. Review of the Diet Orders, printed 06/05/23, showed 16 residents with a physician-ordered mechanical soft diet (with mechanical soft meat). Review of the Diet Spreadsheet, for Lunch Day 2, Monday (06/05/23), showed residents with mechanical soft diet orders were to be served ground meatballs with gravy (#8 dip) and sauce (2 ounces). Review of the recipe binder showed the following: -Ground…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet when staff failed to serve replacement food items that ran out during the meal service, and failed to serve appropriate food substitutes to honor resident preferences. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility's policy, Accommodation of Needs, revised 10/12/21, showed the following: -Reasonable accommodations will be made by the Dietary Department to those residents with food preferences. A food preference inventory will be conducted during the Initial Nutritional Screen by the Dietary Manager. -Substitutes of like calorie value will be offered to the resident if the planned menu is refused. If the resident refused the nutritional substitute, a menu of like caloric value will be offered. 1. During interview on 06/06/23 at 11:16 A.M. Resident #50 said the following: -For dinner on 06/05/23, he/she was looking forward to eating the white chicken chili but it ran out and he/she received a slice of bologna on two pieces of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide drinks to residents who preferred to have drinks while waiting for their meals in the dining room. This affected seven residents (Resident #68, #26, #84, #17, #23, #59, and #145) The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy Nutrition-Hydration Protocol, dated 6/7/23, showed residents will be provided sufficient fluid intake to maintain hydration and health. During interview on 6/6/23 at 7:45 A.M., Resident #68 said he/she would like to have drinks while awaiting meals as he/she had to sit so long. He/She has to wait over an hour in the morning to get any coffee. Residents have to sit for one to two hours for supper with no drinks. During interview on 6/6/23 at 9:21 A.M., Resident #26 said he/she would like to have drinks while waiting for meals since it took a long time (to get his/her meal). Observations and interviews in the dining room on 6/6/23 showed the following: -At 12:00 P.M., observation showed many residents sat at tables in the dining room without drinks; -At 12:10 P.M., Resident #84 said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code section G Functional Status of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally required assessment completed by staff, according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for two sampled residents (Resident #13 and #18) in a review of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 93. Review of the CMS's RAI version 3.0 Manual, dated October 2019, showed the following: -Coding Instructions for G0110, Column 1, Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Self-Performance: -Code 0, independent if resident completed activity with no help or oversight every time during the 7-day look-back period and the activity occurred at least three times; -Code 1, supervision if oversight, encouragement, or cueing was provided three or more times during the last 7 days; -Code 2, limited assistance if resident was highly involved in activity and received physical help in guided maneuvering of limb(s) or other non-weight-bearing assistance on three or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standard of care for two residents (Resident #71 and #84), in a review of 23 sampled residents, when staff failed to follow physician's orders for treatments. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy, Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders, revised 07/09/21, showed all physician orders should be followed. Review of the facility policy, Medication Administration and Monitoring, revised on 09/17/21, showed the following: -Medications are to be given per physician's orders; -Watch the resident take the medication. 1. Review of Resident #71's face sheet showed the resident's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (too much sugar in the bloodstream) and cellulitis of unspecified part of limb (a common and potentially serious bacterial skin infection). Review of the resident's June 2023 physician order sheet showed an order for Mupirocin 2% ointment (an antibiotic ointment used to treat skin infections), apply to left heel every day shift for open area. Cleanse with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the necessary care and services to maintain good oral hygiene for one resident, (Residents #64), in a review of 23 sampled residents, who took no fluids or nutrition in by mouth (NPO) and required assistance to perform their activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 93. Review of the facility policy, Oral Care, revised 03/25/2022, showed residents should all receive good oral hygiene. The facility did not provide a policy for addressing oral care in residents who were not able to to receive anything by mouth, (NPO). 1. Review of Resident #64's face sheet showed diagnoses including traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head), epilepsy (seizure disorder), encephalopathy (a brain disease that alters brain function or structure) and malignant neoplasm of brain (a fast growing cancer that spreads to other areas of the brain and spine). Review of the resident's care plan, revised on 02/02/23, showed the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-13 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain the services of a Speech Therapist (ST) for one sampled resident (Resident #90) out of 23 sampled residents and one additionally sampled resident (Resident #73) or obtain testing needed for ST to evaluate residents for appropriate diets. The facility census was 93. Review of the facility's policy Physician's Orders for Therapy, dated 1/19/22, showed the following: -All admissions, re-admissions and changes in functional status, that require therapeutic intervention will be screened for therapy services; -When evaluation and treatment orders are obtained by the Director of Nursing/Designee or MDS Coordinator, they will be transcribed to the Physician's Orders; -The therapy recommendations will be reviewed by the Administrator and Director of Nursing. Only after the Licensed or Registered Nurse receives Physician's orders (therapy clarification orders) designating the type of therapy (Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy and Speech Therapy),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-09 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete required employee background screenings by failing to provide documentation of criminal background checks (CBC), employee disqualification list (EDL) checks, and/or nurse aide registry checks completed prior to employment for four of ten newly hired employees reviewed. The facility census was 92. 1. Review of the facility's policy and procedure (undated) on pre-employment screening, showed the following: -Human Resources (HR) will conduct pre-employment screens on applicants to determine whether the applicant has committed a disqualifying crime, is an excluded provider of any federal or state healthcare programs, is eligible to work in the United States, and, if applicable, is duly licensed or certified to perform the duties for which they applied; -A criminal background check should be done through the Missouri Highway Patrol's Missouri Automated Criminal History Site. A copy of the results must be printed with the original initialed and dated by the person who conducted the check; -If a check is made through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to design an activity program to meet the needs, interests, physical, mental and psychosocial well being for one resident (Resident #52) in a review of 19 sampled residents and six additional residents (Residents #47, #27, #5, #32, #30 and #91). Staff failed to ensure weekend activities were provided for residents in the locked units. The facility census was 92. 1. Review of the facility's undated policy, Activities, showed the following: -The purpose of the polity is to ensure all residents in the facility are provided an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with comprehensive assessment, their interests and their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; -To ensure an ongoing program of activities is designed, the life enhancement director will monitor large and small group activities, one-on-one programming and self-directed activities. The life enhancement director will modify the care plan interventions to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment on the locked mens' unit was maintained to be in good repair, clean and homelike. The census was 92. 1. Review of the facility policy Environmental Rounds revised 4/6/2017 showed the following: -To ensure the safety of all residents and staff within the unit; -Environmental rounds are to be done daily by the Department Heads; -The Department Head should be inspecting the room for potentially hazardous items and any areas that may not be in compliance of state and federal regulations. Observation on 10/6/19 at 1:03 P.M. in the locked mens' unit showed the following: -The dining room was painted lime green in color. There were multiple white patches on the green paint; -A torn cove base on wall under light switch by dining room door; -No cove base along floor beside sink area in dining room; -Multiple cracks in the ceiling in the dining room; -Dining room floor scuffed and soiled with brown black debris; -Multiple nicks and gouges on the window frame in the dining room; -Gray vinyl wall board…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$49,897 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $49,897 — penalty dated 2025-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bernard Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Bridgewood Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Brookfield Health Care CenterBrookfield, MO 1 of 5Brunswick Health Care CenterBrunswick, MO 1 of 5Carrie Elligson Gietner Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Cassville Health Care CenterCassville, MO 1 of 5Chariton Park Health Care CenterSalisbury, MO 1 of 5Crestwood Health Care CenterFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Eastview Manor Care CenterTrenton, MO 1 of 5Edgewood Manor Health Care CenterRaytown, MO 1 of 5Fair View Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Four Seasons Living CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Grand Manor Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Gregory Ridge Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Heritage Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Hidden Lake Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Holton Health Care CenterHolton, KS 1 of 5Legendary Health Care CenterMarshall, MO 1 of 5Nathan Richard Health Care CenterNevada, MO 1 of 5Nick's Health Care CenterPlattsburg, MO 1 of 5North Village ParkMoberly, MO 1 of 5Odessa Health Care CenterOdessa, MO 1 of 5Parkway Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Rest Haven Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Sarcoxie Health Care CenterSarcoxie, MO 1 of 5South County Health Care CenterArnold, MO 1 of 5Wellsville Health Care CenterWellsville, MO 1 of 5Westview Nursing HomeCenter, MO 2 of 5St Elizabeth Care CenterSaint Elizabeth, MO 2 of 5Stonecrest HealthcareViburnum, MO 3 of 5Greenville Health Care CenterGreenville, MO 3 of 5Portageville Health Care CenterPortageville, MONot rated (Special Focus)Hillside Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RELIANT CARE INVESTORS INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/28/2011
JONES, DELYNNAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/29/2017
DESTEFANE, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/28/2011
RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/28/2011

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$943K
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 93%Medicare 2%Other / private 5%

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $943K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$208per resident / day
operating cost
$6,325per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$199per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265238. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next