No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage Care Center

4401 North Hanley Road, Saint Louis, MO 63134 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (314) 521-7471 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0741, F0758)10 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$424,748 in federal fines3 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0603) — most recent Sep 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 10 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (95) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $424,748 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (75%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
7840 Natural Bridge Rd · (314) 516-5131 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4600 N Hanley Rd · (314) 996-0900 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1501 S Florissant Rd · (314) 522-1058 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4398 N Hanley Rd · (314) 982-1406 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.3%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.1%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms72.7%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.6%17.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.4%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.9%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.0%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table48.4%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.5%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.6%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.392.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.232.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.3–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.2–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.731.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.09
RN hours/ resident / day
0.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.35
Aide hours/ resident / day
1.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.10
RN hoursweekends
75.0%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 106.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.85 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.09 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.02 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.08 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 75% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-09)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-29)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

95 citations, most serious first. The 25 most serious are shown; the remaining 70 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #7), who had a history of elopement at prior facilities, was provided adequate supervision, when staff did not confirm the resident's whereabouts for at least 4.5 hours (from 2:30 P.M. to approximately 7:00 P.M.) on 01/12/26. Review of the resident's record showed the resident had a legal guardian and diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition of schizophrenia symptoms (such as hallucinations, delusions, or disorganized thinking), bipolar type (involves alternating 'poles' of intense, elevated, or irritable mania/hypomania and profound, low energy depressive episodes that severely disrupt life), lack of coordination and muscle weakness. The resident's care plan showed he/she had a history of elopement at prior facilities and interventions included intensive monitoring. The sample was eight. The facility census was 109. The Administrator was notified on 2/13/26 at 5:12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Please see deficiency cited at F689 in Event ID 533H12. This citation is uncorrected. See the narrative at Event ID 533H11. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, please see the Statement of Deficiencies dated 3/14/25.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), with a known history of suicidal ideation, high risk of suicide and frequent self-harming behavior received adequate supervision. The facility determined the resident required close supervision, defined as supervision from three to five feet, to ensure the resident's safety and well-being. Per the resident's care plan, the resident was to receive 1:1 monitoring. On 3/3/25, staff assigned to provide 1:1 supervision for the resident were reassigned to other duties and left the resident unsupervised in his/her room with the door closed. The resident broke the window in his/her room and used the glass to cut himself/herself resulting in multiple deep cuts requiring medical intervention. The sample size was eleven. The census was 106. The Administrator was notified on 3/13/25 at 2:20 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 3/3/25. The IJ was removed on 3/13/25, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See the narrative at event ID WGJ612 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served a resident, who required supervision, the correct diet ordered by the physician. (Resident #7). The resident had a diet order, dated 9/13/24, for mechanical soft texture (food is altered to be soft and easy to chew) foods. During lunch, on 1/13/25, staff served the resident a regular textured ham sandwich. The resident began to choke. Staff intervened and were unsuccessful with completely clearing the resident's airway. Staff performed life saving measures until emergency medical staff arrived; who eventually were able to dislodge several pieces of regular textured thinly sliced meat. The resident was hospitalized and expired on 1/17/25. The sample was 10. The census was 110.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served a resident, who required supervision, the correct diet ordered by the physician. (Resident #7). The resident had a diet order, dated 9/13/24, for mechanical soft texture (food is altered to be soft and easy to chew) foods. During lunch, on 1/13/25, staff served the resident a regular textured ham sandwich. The resident began to choke. Staff intervened and were unsuccessful with completely clearing the resident's airway. Staff performed life saving measures until emergency medical staff arrived; who eventually were able to dislodge several pieces of regular textured thinly sliced meat. The resident was hospitalized and expired on 1/17/25. The sample was 10. The census was 110. The Administrator was notified on 1/30/25 at 12:23 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 1/13/25. The IJ was removed on 1/30/25, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Explanation of Diets dated, 2024 showed: -Mechanical Soft: This consistency modified diet is for individuals with limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one of five sampled residents with a history of elopement, hallucinations/delusions, behavioral difficulties and/or mental illness symptoms requiring 24 hour monitoring/management, and limited insight and judgement. Facility staff failed to make visual observations of the resident hourly, staff failed to follow up after not seeing the resident to administer ordered medications, and failed to ensure exit doors were working properly. Resident #1 left the building without staff's knowledge on 6/10/24 at 6:37 AM. Facility staff responsible for conducting visual checks- failed to do so, although they were documented as completed. The resident remained gone from the facility for over 24 hours before staff realized the resident was missing on 6/11/24 at 8:00 AM. The resident was not located until 6/13/24 at approximately 2:00 P.M. by another area police department at a gas station. The census was 107. The Administrator was notified on 6/14/24 at 5:36 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the deficiency cited at Event 6lBE12. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent abuse between staff and Resident #1, and failed to protect Resident #1 and other residents by not following their policy and immediately removing the alleged staff member from the facility. The alleged staff member worked every day, for an additional 24 days after the alleged abuse. The resident said he/she felt unsafe and the alleged staff member caused the resident physical harm and humiliation. The facility also failed to ensure Residents #13 and #14 were free of resident to resident abuse. The sample was 14. The census was 111. The Administrator was notified on 1/29/24 at 12:53 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 12/31/23. The IJ was removed on 1/29/24, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, revised 1/5/23, showed the following: -Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent abuse between staff and Resident #1, and failed to protect Resident #1 and other residents by not following their policy and immediately removing the alleged staff member from the facility. The alleged staff member worked every day, for an additional 24 days after the alleged abuse. The resident said he/she felt unsafe and the alleged staff member caused the resident physical harm and humiliation. The facility also failed to ensure Residents #13 and #14 were free of resident to resident abuse. The sample was 14. The census was 111. The Administrator was notified on 1/29/24 at 12:53 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 12/31/23. The IJ was removed on 1/29/24, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, revised 1/5/23, showed the following: -Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for one resident (Resident #1) who had a history of elopement and a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly) when staff failed to provide supervision during a smoke break, failed to conduct a head count after the smoke break, failed to conduct hourly face checks, and did not discover the resident was missing until nine hours after the resident left the building. The resident sample was 4. The census was 114. The Administrator was notified on 12/10/23 at 3:00 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 12/8/23. The IJ was removed on 12/11/23, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Intensive Monitoring/Visual Checks policy, revised on 6/30/23, showed: -Purpose: To ensure a system is in place for residents who require increased monitoring for behavioral/psychiatric and medical issues; -Procedure: Residents who require more intensive monitoring due to medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-12 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of treatment and services for one resident (Resident #1), diagnosed with a mental health disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event, causing flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety) to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to provide or arrange for mental health services, and failed to notify psychiatric services of suicide attempts and of the contents of the suicide note authored by the resident. Facility staff also did not follow the facility's program for a proper therapeutic hold while the resident had a behavior emergency. The sample was 14. The census was 111. The Administrator was notified on 1/29/24 at 12:53 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 12/27/23. The IJ was removed on 1/29/24, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Behavioral Emergency policy, dated revised 1/5/23, showed: -Purpose: To provide safe treatment and humane care to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, facility policy reviews, and review of a manufacturer's user's guide, the facility failed to ensure a multi-use blood glucose meter was cleaned and disinfected after each use for three (Residents #4, #28, and #35) of six sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility also failed to ensure staff did not touch medication with their bare hands for one (Resident #24) of six sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. Further, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands before and after gloves were removed during wound care for one (Resident #211) of twenty seven sampled residents. In addition, the facility failed to follow their infection control policy when staff failed to complete the second step of the employee tuberculosis (TB, a potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs) screening tests for five employees. The census was 108. It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation caused, or was likely to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one resident (Resident #4) to participate in his/her own plan of care, when the resident was placed in a secured/locked unit based solely on his/her history of justice involvement. This failure did not support the resident's goals, choices, and preferences. This practice affected one resident who was admitted into the facility and immediately placed on the secured unit due to his/her status as a sex offender (Resident #4). The resident was described as being visibly upset when he/she got to the facility. The resident stated he/she did not want to come to this facility, and no one asked or provided him/her any paperwork. The resident stated he/she didn't do anything and didn't know why he/she was locked up in this place. The sample was 5. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Sex Offender (Resident) Policy, revised 12/1/22, showed: -Purpose: Establish policy and protocol to develop good risk management practices regarding the decision to admit registered sex offenders; Establish procedure for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-14 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility placed one resident (Resident #4) on a secured/locked unit within the facility, without clinical justification and an assessment of whether the individual met the criteria for admission on to a secured unit. The facility placed the resident, who was cognitively intact and their own responsible person, on the secured unit- based solely on his/her status as a registered sex offender. The resident stated he/she did not want to come to this facility, and no one asked or provided him any paperwork. The resident stated he/she didn't do anything and didn't know why he/she was locked up in this place. The sample was 5. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Sex Offender (Resident) Policy, revised 12/1/22, showed: -Purpose: Establish policy and protocol to develop good risk management practices regarding the decision to admit registered sex offenders; Establish procedure for assessing where residents will reside in facility; Protecting all residents from abuse while abiding by anti-discrimination laws to protect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #363) of ten residents were properly supervised to prevent an accident. The facility failed to ensure Resident #363, who had a diagnoses of suicidal ideation and schizophrenia, was supervised with a razor, which resulted in Resident #363 cutting him/her self with the razor, causing injuries to the neck and wrists. The facility census was 108. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Behavioral Emergency Policy, revised on 01/05/2023, indicated, It is the Policy of [the facility] to provide a safe environment and provide humane care to all Residents. If the resident exhibits extreme behaviors such as suicidal, homicidal, self-mutilation, elopement, or Resident to Resident altercations the following steps will occur: 4. The Physician will be notified of the licensed nurse/Team Leader/RCC [Resident Care Coordinator] assessment and orders will be followed. 5. The licensed nurse/Team Leader/RCC will follow all physician orders and will notify the Management Team…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0586 — isolated
    Not prohibit or in any way discourage a resident from communicating with federal, state, or local officials.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to communicate freely with the State Survey Agency (SSA) when the facility's Social Service Director (SSD) and Administrator confronted one resident after the resident voiced concerns about calling the SSA hotline (Resident #15). The sample was 10. The census was 103. Review of the facility's Grievance policy, dated 12/27/24, showed the following:-Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal;-Resident Right to File a Grievance: Every resident has the right to voice their grievance with the facility or other agency. Grievances could include care and treatment that was not provided, behavior or staff or other residents, or any other concerns regarding their stay. A grievance is a formal complaint, not a question or concern brought to a staff member or a call to the compliance hotline. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 9/21/25, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0555 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the rights of residents to choose their own physician. The facility discontinued services with Physician A, who provided care to 15 residents. Of those, 4 residents were sampled and 2 reported concerns with being unable to choose their physician (Residents #2 and #7). The sample was 8. The census was 104.Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 9/21/25, showed the following:-Purpose: To ensure that resident rights are protected;-Resident Rights Under Social Security Act: Resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside facility. Facility must protect and promote rights of each resident, including each of the following rights:--Notice of Rights and Services: Facility must inform resident both orally and in writing in a language that resident understands of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to follow their policies when staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation of a resident-to-resident altercation between two residents, when one resident (Resident #1) pulled a screwdriver on another resident (Resident #2) and attempted to stab him/her. The sample was eight. The census was 109.Review of the facility's Incidents and Accidents policy, revised 05/18/24, showed:-Purpose: It is the policy of this facility for staff to utilize Point Click Care Risk Management to report, investigate, and review any accidents or incidents that occur or allegedly occur, on facility property and may involve or allegedly involve a resident;-Definition:Incident: An incident is defined as an occurrence or situation that is not consistent with the routine care of a resident or with the routine operation of the organization;-Policy: Purpose of Incident Reporting:The purpose of incident reporting can include: Assuring that appropriate and immediate interventions are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a complete and thorough facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. In addition, the facility failed to have a facility assessment that addressed staffing ratios required per shift to meet the needs of residents, the need for a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, designated an RN to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON), and followed their infection control prevention and control program by ensuring residents received required immunizations. There was no documentation of ratios of direct care staff, restorative therapy staff, Social Services staff, dietary staff, housekeeping and laundry staff necessary on each shift to ensure the needs of residents are met. The facility failed to provide information regarding staff competencies and skill sets that are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. The census was 105.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective quality assurance (QA)/quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program when they failed to ensure they implemented appropriate interventions to correct on-going, systemic issues. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 105.Review of the facility's QAPI Plan, dated 5/14/21, showed:-This QAPI plan provides guidance for the facility overall quality improvement program. Quality assurance performance improvement principles will drive the decision making within the facility. Decisions will be made to promote excellence in quality of care, quality of life, resident choice, person directed care, and resident transitions;-Focus areas will include all systems that affect resident and family satisfaction, quality of care and services provided, and all areas that affect the quality of life for residents and staff;-On an annual basis, and as needed, a Facility Assessment will be conducted. Any chances in the facility assessment will be reflected, as necessary, in the QAPI Plan;-The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection control when the facility failed to ensure an active Legionnaires' (Legionella, bacteria in water that causes pneumonia) program was in place. In addition, staff did not pick up or replace oxygen or nebulizer tubing left on the bedroom floor for 3 of 3 residents sampled who received oxygen and breathing treatments (Residents #54, #2 and #45). The sample was 43. The census was 105. Review of the infection prevention and control program, revised 5/7/24, showed:-Purpose: The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines;-Policy: -The designated infection preventionist is responsible for oversight of the program and serves as a consultant to our…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic stewardship program was in place and in use by failing to collect data regarding antibiotic treatment, reviewing and documenting the data to the antibiotic surveillance program. Five residents were identified as receiving antibiotics and issues were discovered with all five (Residents #9, #34, #2, #72 and #64). The sample was 43. The census was 105.Review of the Infection prevention and control program, revised 5/7/24, showed:-Purpose: The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections;-Policy:-The designated infection preventionist (IP) is responsible for oversight of the program and serves as a consultant to staff on infectious diseases, room placement, implementing isolation procedures, staff and resident exposures, surveillance and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-09 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training and certification in infection prevention and control as the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) for the facility's infection prevention control program. The census was 105. Review of the Infection prevention and control program, revised 5/7/24, showed:-Purpose: The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections;-Policy:-The designated infection preventionist (IP) is responsible for oversight of the program and serves as a consultant to staff on infectious diseases, room placement, implementing isolation procedures, staff and resident exposures, surveillance and epidemiological investigations of exposures of infectious diseases. During an interview on 9/4/25 at 2:03 P.M., the Administrator said Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) A is the IP for the facility. She had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for resident areas throughout the building. The census was 105. 1. 1. Observation on 9/3/2025 at 11:00 A.M., 9/5/2025 at 1:15 P.M., and 9/9/2025 at 9:30 A.M., showed the following:-Room C1, behind the door, showed drywall mudding, measuring 30 inches () by 4 in length, unpainted;-Shared bathroom, located between C1 -C3, with missing cove base along the doorway of C1, exposing a large hole in the wall 8x4;-Shared bathroom, located between C1 -C3, with missing cove base along the doorway of C3 and behind the toilet;-Between room C1 and C3, in the hallway, a section measuring 4x4 of unpainted area, exposing four 1/2 holes;-Shared bathroom, located between C5 -C7, with cove base pulled away from wall along the doorway of C5, exposing crumbling drywall;-Room C7 bed 1, overhead bed light plastic cover laying on top of the fixture, exposing the light bulb;-Room C6 bed 1, approximate 14x4 unpainted section with two 1/2 circle holes;-Room C9 bed 1, 3x3 hole…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a full time Director of Nursing (DON), who did not serve as a charge nurse, when the facility had a census over 60. The census was 105.Review of the facility's Registered Nurse (RN) policy, dated 4/30/24, showed:-Purpose: It is the intent of the facility to comply with Registered Nurse staffing requirements;-Full-time is defined as working 40 or more hours a week;-Charge Nurse is a licensed nurse with specific responsibilities designed by the facility that may include staff supervision, emergency coordinator, physician liaison, as well as direct resident care;-Policy: The facility will utilize the services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week;-The facility will designate a Registered Nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing on a full time basis;-The Director of Nursing may serve as charge nurse only when the facility has average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents;-The facility is responsible for submitting timely and accurate staffing data through the CMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 70 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's policy and procedure for the monthly drug regimen review by failing to ensure the physician or designee responded to the pharmacy recommendation timely for nine residents (Residents #2, #7, #11, #72, #64, #13, #67, #35 and #85). The sample was 43. The census was 105.Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) policy, dated 6/26/24, showed: -Purpose: the drug regimen of each resident is reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and includes a review of the medical chart;-Policy: -MRR or drug regimen review, is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes: -Review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities; -Collaboration with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and vaccinate, as desired, eligible residents with the pneumococcal (pneumonia) and influenza (flu) vaccine for 5 out of 5 residents sampled for immunizations (Residents #85, #72, #67, #54 and #45). The sample was 43. The census was 105. Review of the influenza and pneumococcal immunization policy, revised 5/14/24, showed:-Purpose: to ensure that all residents residing in the facility are offered influenza and pneumococcal immunizations to prevent infection and the spread of communicable disease;-Procedure: -At admission, the resident and/or the resident's legal representative will be provided education on the benefits and potential side effects of both the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations; -The resident or their legal representative will be informed that the influenza immunization are provided yearly between October 1st and March 31, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated, the facility has evidence that the resident has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who experienced bilateral (both sides) finger amputations, had an accessible device to call for staff assistance (Resident #40). The sample was 43. The census was 105. Review of Resident #40's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/11/25, showed:-Cognitively intact;-Able to make needs and wants known;-Required physical assistance for eating; -Required brace for eating;-Required physical assistance for hygiene, eating, transfers and daily care;-Diagnoses included superficial frostbite of the left and right hand (a mild to moderate form of frostbite where ice crystals form in the top layers of the skin, making the skin appear pale, waxy, and feel stiff or hard), schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized primarily by symptoms of schizophrenia, such as hallucinations or delusions, and symptoms of a mood disorder, such as mania and depression), bipolar type (hallucinations with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund account by not reconciling each month. The facility managed funds for 98 residents. The census was 105. Review of the facility's Resident Trust policy, dated 6/12/25, showed Resident Trust clerk must reconcile the cash left in the box with the receipts in the box by completing the Resident Trust Petty Cash Reconciliation Form. Attach all receipts in the petty cash box to the Resident Trust Petty Cash Reconciliation form. The administrator signs reconciliation form for approval.Review of the facility-maintained bank statements for the months 4/25 through 7/25, showed no documentation of reconciliations.Review of the facility-maintained attempted reconciliation forms, dated 4/25 through 7/25, showed the attempted reconciliations did not reconcile to the residents' current balance at the time of the attempted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's right to be free from physical abuse was not violated when one resident was placed in a head lock by Floor Tech N (Resident #39). The sample was 43. The census was 105. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 6/12/24, showed the following:-Purpose: -It is the policy of this facility ensure all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed time frames;-Physical Abuse: -Purposefully beating, striking, wounding, or injuring any resident or any manner whatsoever mistreating or maltreating a resident in a brutal or inhumane manner. Physical abuse includes handling a resident with any more force than is reasonable for a resident's proper control, treatment or management. Physical abuse also includes, but is not limited to,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to prevent the misappropriation of one resident's patient trust funds, which was used without authorization of the resident. The funds were withdrawn from resident's patient trust account between the dates of 4/10 and 4/17/25, with total withdrawals of $7,877.01 (Resident #20). The census was 105. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect, dated 6/12/24, showed:-Misappropriation of resident property is the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent, use of resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent;-Theft of money from bank accounts;-Unauthorized or coerced purchases from resident's funds;-The Administrator will conduct all investigations. A formal investigation shall begin immediately and include interviews with all staff, interview facility residents and document that interviews were completed. Review of Resident #20's Mental Status Exam, dated 8/18/25, showed:-No cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to the hospital and the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer for three residents who were discharged to the hospital (Residents #119, #69 and #114) out of three residents sampled for bed hold notification. The census was 105.Review of the facility's undated admission agreement, showed facility offers a bed hold policy which assures you of re-occupation to your bed during a temporary absence from facility due to therapeutic leave or hospital admission. If you choose not to hold the bed during an absence from the facility, that bed shall be considered vacant and facility may place another resident in it for occupancy. If your personal belongings have not been removed and it becomes necessary to occupy that room with another resident, facility will package all personal items and place them in storage for a period not to exceed two (2) weeks. Upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents received an accurate assessment, reflective of the residents' status at the time of assessment, by failing to identify the residents' hospice admission (Residents #10 and #36). The facility identified three residents receiving hospice services, two were sampled. The census was 105. 1. Review of Resident #10's face sheet, showed his/her diagnoses included malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumors) of cecum (pouch that forms the first part of the large intestine), secondary malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile duct, and secondary malignant neoplasm of left lung.Review of the resident's Physician's Orders Sheet (POS), showed an order, dated 5/20/25, okay for hospice to evaluate and treat. Review of the resident's care plan, in use during survey, showed:-Problem: Resident receiving chemotherapy related to cancer that has metastasized (mets, spread to other parts of the body) to several areas of his/her body;-Desired Outcome:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recommended hospice evaluation received the ordered hospice evaluation. The resident's physician assessed the resident on 7/18/25 and documented the resident received hospice services. On 7/30/25, the resident experienced a change in condition. Staff discovered the resident had not been enrolled into hospice services and did not notify the physician of the discovery. The resident expired at the facility approximately three hours after the change in condition (Resident #118). The census was 105. Review of the notifying clinician's policy, revised 6/26/24, showed:-Purpose: to ensure clinicians are properly notified of a resident's change in condition and overall, health and mental status;-Policy: -Process for notification: -Before calling the physician, the nurse must ensure they have all pertinent/situational information on the resident readily available; -The clinician shall be notified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete smoking assessments for two residents, to evaluate their smoking behavior risks. Both residents were smoking in their rooms. In addition, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate safety interventions (Residents #7 and #108). The census was 105.Review of the facility's policy entitled, Smoking Safety Regulations, dated 6/23, showed:-Policy: to ensure staff and residents are following the safety regulations for smoking as outlined by the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protections Association (NFPA).-Facility will provide direct supervision for smoking by patients classified as not responsible.Review of the facility's undated admission agreement, showed:-Section M, entitled Smoking: smoking is allowed only in designated smoking areas and times set forth by the facility. Residents shall only be permitted to smoke in accordance with the resident assessment and plan of care. Review of Resident #7's annual Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective pain management regime for one sampled resident (Resident #90). Staff failed to ensure Resident #90, who experienced pain related to chronic osteomyelitis with drainage sinus, right tibia and fibula involvement (a long-standing bone infection affecting the shinbone) and chronic pain most severe on the right knee, received physician prescribed Percocet (narcotic which treats moderate to moderately severe pain). The sample was 21. The census was 105.Review of the facility's Pain Management Policy, revised 6/26/24, included:-Recognized when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when the pain can be anticipated;-Evaluate the resident for the pain and the cause(s) upon admission, during ongoing scheduled assessments, and when significant change of condition or status occurs (after fall, change in behavior or mental statues, new pain or exacerbation of pain);-Manage or prevent, consistent with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, current professional standards,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from significant medication errors. Staff attempted incorrect administration technique for one resident, when he/she did not prime the insulin Flex pen in accordance with facility policy (Resident #2). The census was 105.Review of the facility's medication administration of insulin policy, revised May 2024, showed:-Prepare an insulin dose, before administering insulin, perform two nurse verifications of the correct resident, dose calculations, and correct route of administration.-Insulin pens will be primed prior to each use to avoid collection of air in the insulin reservoir,-Dial 2 units (U) by turning the dose selector clockwise,-With the needle pointed up, push the plunger and watch to see that at least one drop (gtt) appears. Review of Resident #2's medical record, showed his/her diagnoses included diabetes, morbidly obese (severe), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease that causes difficulty breathing), metabolic encephalopathy (altered brain function) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain controlled substances in a restricted area until appropriate medical staff could destroy them. The Registered Nurse (RN) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) medication cart assigned to the B and D halls held two discharged residents' narcotics for several weeks (Residents #114 and #117). The census was 105. Review of the facility's Narcotic Destruction Policy, revision date 6/24, showed:-All controlled substances shall be retained in a securely locked area with restricted access until authorized nursing personnel destroy them;-Any medication that is to be destroyed is to be locked in a separate cabinet and labeled to be destroyed. No other items, medications or treatments are allowed to be stores in the to be destroyed cabinet;-Medications should not be placed in the pocket or in an unsecured medication drawer to be handled at a later time. It must immediately be in the to be destroyed cabinet;-Destruction shall be completed as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective pain management regime for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1). Staff failed to administer a stronger physician ordered pain medication for Resident #1, who complained of severe back pain. The census was 112. Review of the facility's Pain Management Policy, updated 6/26/24, showed the following: -Purpose: The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences; -Policy: The facility will utilize a systemic approach for recognition, assessment, treatment and monitoring of pain; -Recognition of Pain: 1 a. Recognize when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when the pain can be anticipated. 1 c. Manage or prevent pain, consistent with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, current professional standards of practice and the resident's goals and preferences; -Pain Assessment:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to facilitate residents' rights to have reasonable reliable access to and privacy in their use of electronic communications such as email and video communications, for internet research and to watch television when the facility failed to provide WiFi services. This had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The sample was 7. The census was 106. Review of facility's Internet Provider documentation, showed: -Notice of Material Breach: -The facility was sent notification on/or around 9/16/24 by the Internet Provider that detailed the facility's violation of their Acceptable User Policy and the agreement. The facility shared its business/office only internet with the residents living at the facility. The residents then hooked up their personal devices to the business/office only internet. The facility allowed the continued use of the business/office only internet by the residents even after multiple Internet Provider notifications. The facility was given a timeframe to add a resident internet service package…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control by ensuring resident rooms were free from mice and/or mice excrement in Residents #9, #10, and #11's rooms. In addition the facility failed to ensure the common/activity area on C-Hall was free from roaches. The sample was eleven. The census was 106. Review of the facility's Pest Control policy, last reviewed 5/14/24, showed: -Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents; -Definition: Effective pest control program is defined as measures to eradicate and contain common household pests (e.g., bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitoes, flies, mice, and rats); -Policy: Facility will maintain a written agreement with a qualified outside pest service to provide comprehensive pest control services on a regular and scheduled basis. Review of the facility's pest control vendor invoices, showed: -Dated 1/31/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure before the facility transferred or discharged a resident, they notified the resident, who was his/her own responsible party, of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing. The facility failed to ensure the notice of transfer or discharge was made by the facility at least 30 days before the resident was transferred or discharged , and that the discharge or transfer notice included the reason for transfer or discharge, effective date, location in which the resident would be discharged , and the resident's right to appeal for one resident (Resident #5). The sample was 5. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Resident Transfer/Discharge, Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave policy, revised 5/14/24, showed: -Purpose: Establish policy and procedure regarding the transfer/discharge of residents; -Definitions: -Facility Initiated Transfer or discharge: A transfer or discharge which the resident objects to, which did not originate through a resident's verbal or written request, and/or is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards when staff did not clarify the instructions on one resident's discharge paperwork with the eye clinic after his/her eye appointment, which resulted in his/her eye surgery not being scheduled (Resident #6). The sample was 5. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Order policy, revised 5/18/24, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to outline procedures in accurately transcribing physician's orders and to ensure that all physicians' orders are followed. To ensure a process is in place to monitor nurses in accurately transcribing and following physician's orders; -Procedure: Clarification of physician's orders will be obtained if the order is either unclear or the nurse is uncomfortable in implementation of the physician's orders. Review of Resident #6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, target date 2/26/25, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Wheelchair; -Diagnoses included,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to complete a comprehensive discharge summary for one discharged resident record reviewed (Resident #5). The sample was 5. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Nursing Discharge Summary policy, revised 5/14/24, showed: -Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that a discharge summary is provided upon a resident's discharge which addresses each resident's discharge goals and needs, including caregiver support and referrals to local contact agencies; -Definitions: -Anticipated discharge means that the discharge is planned and not due to the resident's death or an emergency; -Continuing care provider means the entity or person who will assume responsibility for the resident's care after discharge. This includes licensed facilities, agencies, physicians, practitioners, and/or other licensed caregivers; -Recapitulation of stay means a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility; -Reconciliation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient and competent staff to care for one resident who required 1:1 staff supervision for safety and behaviors (Resident #1). Staff failed to follow the resident's care plan intervention of avoiding power struggles when the resident wanted to go to bed but was told there was not enough staff to take him/her. This contributed to the resident's escalated aggressive behavior which resulted in the resident being sent out to the hospital via ambulance. The sample was 8. The census was 106. Review of the facility's Sufficient Staff policy, revised 5/18/24, showed: -Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility's census, acuity and diagnoses of the resident population will be considered based on the facility assessment; -Policy: -The facility will supply services by sufficient numbers of each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is uncorrected. See the narrative at Event ID WGJ612 This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, please see the Statement of Deficiencies dated [DATE]. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse and neglect policy by failing to conduct a thorough investigation for one resident (Resident #7) who had an order for a mechanical soft diet and was served a regular diet. The resident choked and later expired in the hospital. The sample was 10. The census was 110.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they followed their abuse and neglect policy by failing to conduct a thorough investigation into one resident (Resident #8) who was found to have unknown pills in his/her possession and allegedly drank a solution of magnesium citrate (a salt that contains magnesium and citrate ions which is commonly used as a laxative to treat occasional constipation). The sample was eight. The census was 110. Review of the facility's policy, When to Notify Management, dated 8/2/24, showed the following: -Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the facility management and Regional Director are notified for concerns related to the protective oversight of residents and facility operations. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 6/12/24, showed the following: -Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's right to be free from physical abuse was not violated when one resident (Resident #2) and another resident (Resident #3) were involved in three resident to resident altercations before Resident #2 was moved to another hall. In addition, the facility did not update the residents' care plans with interventions after each resident to resident altercation. The sample was five. The census was 112. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 6/12/24, showed the following: -Purpose: -It is the policy of this facility ensure all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed time frames; -Physical Abuse: -Purposefully beating, striking, wounding, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow acceptable infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection, Covid 19 (respiratory virus spread by breathing, coughing and sneezing). The facility had active Covid 19 infections on all halls per signage upon entering. The signs instructed all visitors and staff to wear an N95 mask. Visitors and staff failed to wear N95 masks and or failed to wear them appropriately. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 112. Review of the facility's policy on Personal Protective Equipment, updated 6/26/24, showed the following: -Purpose: Thee facility promotes appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the transmission of pathogens to residents, visitors and other staff; -Policy: A. All staff who have contact with residents and or their environments must wear PPE equipment as appropriate during resident care activities and at other times in which exposure to blood, body fluids or potential infectious materials in the facility; -Respiratory protection: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 27 opportunities for errors, six errors occurred, resulting in an 22.22% medication error rate (Resident #6). The census was 112. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, dated 6/26/24, showed the following: -Purpose: Medications are administered by licensed nurses and other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. It is the policy of this facility to ensure the safe and effective administration of of all medications by utilizing best practice guidelines; -Policy: General Medication Administration Practice: C. Identify resident by photo in the medication administration record (MAR). J. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: 1. Right resident, 2. Right drug, 3. Right dosage, 4. Right route, 5. Right time, 6. Right documentation. K. Review MAR to identify medication to be administered. L. Compare medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error. Staff failed to transcribe antipsychotic medication as ordered for one of six sampled residents, resulting in the resident receiving the incorrect dosage of an antipsychotic medication (Resident #6). The census was 112. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/4/24, showed the following: -Diagnoses of high blood pressure, anxiety and depression; -No cognitive impairment; -No mood problems; -No behavior problems; -Receives antipsychotic medicine: yes. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, dated 6/26/24, showed the following: -Purpose: Medications are administered by licensed nurses and other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. It is the policy of this facility to ensure the safe and effective administration of of all medications by utilizing best practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled residents was free from physical abuse. The resident's right to be free from physical abuse (Resident #5) was violated when another resident (Resident #4) hit the resident in the face and knocked him/her to the floor. The census was 113. On [DATE] at 3:30 P.M., the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance, which occurred on [DATE]. On [DATE], the Administrator was notified by staff of the incident and an investigation was started. The facility immediately took steps to protect the residents and set interventions in place to prevent further abuse. The alleged violation was reported within the required timeframe. Facility staff received education on the facility's Behavioral Emergency Policy and Abuse and Neglect Policy. Both residents' care plans were updated. Appropriate corrective actions were taken. The deficiency was corrected on [DATE]. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the deficiency cited at Event 6lBE12. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable and homelike environment by staff using an employee break room as a smoking area for both residents and staff. The employee break room was not an approved, designated smoking area for the facility. The sample was 11. The census was 111. Review of the facility's resident smoking policy, last reviewed December 2023, showed: -Guidelines: The residents will be safe and have protective oversight during smoke breaks; -The staff will ensure the residents are appropriately dressed for the weather during smoke break times; -There was nothing found in the policy regarding only using designated smoking areas. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/30/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; During an interview on 1/24/24 at 1:29 P.M., the resident said: -His/Her room was located on the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    See the deficiency cited at Event 6lBE12. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of staff to resident abuse involving Resident #1 and Hall Monitor A to the Department of Health of Senior Services within the required two-hour time frame. The sample was 14. The census was 111. Review of the facility's abuse and neglect policy, dated revised 1/5/23, showed: -Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of funds/property, and to define terms of types of abuse/neglect. To ensure immediate reporting of all abuse allegations to the Administrator or designee and the Director of Nursing (DON) or designee and outside persons or agencies. To establish actions related to the alleged perpetrator and to ensure investigation and assessment of all residents involved is completed. -The facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or sexual assault including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    See the deficiency cited at Event 6lBE12. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and to prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress, after being notified by Resident #1 of an allegation of physical abuse. The sample was 14. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, dated revised 1/5/23, showed: -Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of funds/property, and to define terms of types of abuse/neglect. To ensure immediate reporting of all abuse allegations to the Administrator or designee and the Director of Nursing (DON) or designee and outside persons or agencies. To establish actions related to the alleged perpetrator and to ensure investigation and assessment of all residents involved is completed. - Protection of residents: Employees of this facility who have been accused of mistreatment will be immediately removed from contact with any residents and must leave the facility pending the results of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable and homelike environment by staff using an employee break room as a smoking area for both residents and staff. The employee break room was not an approved, designated smoking area for the facility. The sample was 11. The census was 111. Review of the facility's resident smoking policy, last reviewed December 2023, showed: -Guidelines: The residents will be safe and have protective oversight during smoke breaks; -The staff will ensure the residents are appropriately dressed for the weather during smoke break times; -There was nothing found in the policy regarding only using designated smoking areas. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/30/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; During an interview on 1/24/24 at 1:29 P.M., the resident said: -His/Her room was located on the same hall as the staff break room and he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of staff to resident abuse involving Resident #1 and Hall Monitor A to the Department of Health of Senior Services within the required two-hour time frame. The sample was 14. The census was 111. Review of the facility's abuse and neglect policy, dated revised 1/5/23, showed: -Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of funds/property, and to define terms of types of abuse/neglect. To ensure immediate reporting of all abuse allegations to the Administrator or designee and the Director of Nursing (DON) or designee and outside persons or agencies. To establish actions related to the alleged perpetrator and to ensure investigation and assessment of all residents involved is completed. -The facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or sexual assault including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and to prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress, after being notified by Resident #1 of an allegation of physical abuse. The sample was 14. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, dated revised 1/5/23, showed: -Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of funds/property, and to define terms of types of abuse/neglect. To ensure immediate reporting of all abuse allegations to the Administrator or designee and the Director of Nursing (DON) or designee and outside persons or agencies. To establish actions related to the alleged perpetrator and to ensure investigation and assessment of all residents involved is completed. - Protection of residents: Employees of this facility who have been accused of mistreatment will be immediately removed from contact with any residents and must leave the facility pending the results of the investigation and review by administrator.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services according to the resident's plan of care for one resident (Resident #2). During an episode of resident agitation, a staff member completed a one-person hold and brought the resident to the floor by him/herself, which was against facility policy. The facility also failed to follow the resident's care plan which instructed staff not to use the Crisis, Alleviation, Lessons and Methods (per facility policy, CALM) physical intervention with this resident. The sample was four. The census was 114. The Administrator was notified on 12/12/23 of the past non-compliance. The facility immediately began an investigation of the incident, removed the staff member who initiated the physical intervention from the building, and inserviced staff regarding the Behavioral Emergency Policy, the Supportive Techniques Oversight Protection (STOP) Program and the Abuse/Neglect Policy. The resident received a medical assessment at the hospital.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility record and policy reviews, the facility failed to store foods off the floor and away from chemicals, ensure employees wore hair restraints, and failed to maintain the ice machine to prevent dirt/grime build up for all residents who received nourishment from the kitchen. The facility census was 108. Findings included: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Dietary - Receiving and Storing Food and Supplies, revised on 06/30/2023, indicated, All foods should be stored away from the walls and off the floor. The policy further indicated, Cleaning supplies must be stored in a separate area away from all food. On 09/18/2023 beginning at 8:46 A.M., the surveyor observed an outside storage shed with bottled water, pot and pan detergent, a can of diced tomatoes, and a can of diced peaches on the floor. An unopened bag of bowtie pasta was stored on a shelf next to a bottle of sanitizer. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated the facility used the outside storage for dry goods, including food, since she had started working at the facility. The DM stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep residents accounts from going into a negative balance which allowed the residents to spend another resident's money without written authorization. The facility managed funds for 82 residents. A sample of six were chosen and the practice affected three residents (Residents #6, #9, and #10). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account, separate from the facility operating account. The facility did not provide residents with refunds of their personal funds from the operating account in a timely manner for 14 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #11, #12, #14, #18, #20, #45, #102, #108, and #411). The census was 108. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Policy, dated January 2020, showed the following: -Purpose: Policy and Procedure on Resident Trust Responsibilities; -Resident Trust Petty Cash; -When a resident requests a cash withdrawal from his/her personal funds, the petty cash clerk will first verify that the funds are available. This is to be done by obtaining an Open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not reconciling all outstanding checks each month dating back to 2012. The facility managed funds for 82 residents. The census was 108. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Policy, dated January 2020, showed the following: -Purpose: Policy and Procedure on Resident Trust Responsibilities; -Resident Trust Bank Reconciliation: -A reconciliation of the bank statement will be completed by the Corporate Management Company staff accountant. Exceptions may be considered on a case by case basis. The reconciliation must be done by someone other than the Resident Trust Clerk; -On the first day of every month the Resident Trust Clerk must prepare a log of all checks that were written from the resident trust account during the prior month. The list should include the date, check number, payee and amount of the check. This list should be sent to the Corporate Management Company staff accountant responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an adequate surety bond for the resident trust fund account in the amount of one and one half times the average monthly balance for the past 12 months. The census was 108. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Policy, revised dated January 2020, showed the following: -Purpose: Policy and Procedure on Resident Trust Responsibilities; -The facility shall provide assurance of financial security by means of a surety bond. The bond shall be in an amount equal to at least one and one-half (1 & 1/2) times the average total of reconciled monthly balances. A copy of the current bond shall be kept in a file in the facility by the Resident Trust Clerk. Review of the facility's maintained Accounts Receivable (A/R) Aging Report for the period 1/23/23 through 9/23023, dated September 2023, showed the facility held an average balance of resident funds in the amount of $13,345.46 in the facility operating account. Review of the resident trust account for the past 12 months, from September 2022 through August 2023, showed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. Specifically, the facility's medication error rate was 19.23%, with 5 errors out of 26 opportunities. This affected three (Resident #24, #35, and #59) of six sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 108. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration and Monitoring, revised 09/17/2021, specified, Procedure: Medications are to be given per doctor's orders. The policy revealed The nurse or C.M.T. will check each medication to the MAR [Medication Administration Record] noting correct name of medication, correct resident name, correct dose, correct time and correct route of administration. MAR's will be opened to the residents name during dispensing of medications. The policy revealed It is imperative that all medications are given using the seven rights to medications administration and that the professional caregiver ensures that medications are swallowed. a. Right Resident b. Right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to immediately notify the Responsible Party of a change in condition, hospitalization, and room changes for one (Resident #29) of three residents reviewed for notification. Specifically, the facility failed to notify Resident #29's Responsible Party (RP) of the resident's change in condition and transfer to the hospital in a timely manner and failed to notify Resident #29's RP when the resident was moved to a different room. The census was 108. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Resident's Rights, revised 07/05/2023, revealed, 1. Facility must immediately inform Resident, consult with Resident's physician, and if known, notify Resident's legal representative or an interested family member when there is: i. An accident involving Resident which results in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention; ii. A significant change in Resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status (i.e. [such as], a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report three injuries of an unknown origin to the state survey agency for one (Resident #68) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 108. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy, with a revision date of 01/05/2023, revealed Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of funds/property, and to define terms of types of abuse/neglect and misappropriation of funds and property. To ensure immediate reporting of all abuse allegations to the Administrator or designee and the Director of Nursing or designee and outside persons or agencies. The policy specified, Injuries of unknown source - An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when both of the following conditions are met: - The source of injury was not observed by any person or could not be explained by the resident - The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury, the location of the injury on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of injuries of an unknown origin for one (Resident #68) of two sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 108. Findings included: A review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, with a revision date of 01/05/2023, revealed Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of funds/property, and to define terms of types of abuse/neglect and misappropriation of funds and property. The policy specified, D. Investigation Upon learning of the report of abuse or neglect, the Administrator shall initiate an incident investigation. A review of Resident #68's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/16/2020 with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident #68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/25/2023, revealed the Staff Assessment for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #68) of four sampled residents reviewed for discharge, was allowed to remain in the facility without appropriate justification and documentation for a facility-initiated immediate discharge. The facility failed to provide evidence of physician documentation to indicate the basis for Resident #68's facility-initiated discharge from the facility or any resident's needs the facility was not able to provide. The census was 108. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Transfer/Discharge, Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave Policy, revised 06/30/2023 revealed, Purpose: Establish policy and procedure regarding the transfer/discharge of residents Definitions: I. 'Facility-initiated transfer or discharge': A transfer or discharge which the resident objects to, which did not originate through a resident's verbal or written request, and/or is not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. The policy specified, I. A.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #68) of four sampled residents reviewed for discharge, received a 30-day notice of discharge when the facility initiated a discharge to another long-term care facility. The census was 108. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Transfer/Discharge, Immediate Discharge, and Therapeutic Leave Policy, revised 06/30/2023, revealed Purpose: Establish policy and procedure regarding the transfer/discharge of residents Definitions: I. 'Facility-initiated transfer or discharge': A transfer or discharge which the resident objects to, which did not originate through a resident's verbal or written request, and/or is not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. The policy specified, B. What Notice Must Include The written notice shall include the following information: 1. Reason for the transfer or discharge; 2. Effective date of the transfer or discharge; 3. Location to which the resident is being transferred or discharged ,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #54) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) had a comprehensive care plan to address the resident's ADL status and assistance required. The census was 108. Findings included: A facility policy for care plans was not provided by the facility. A review of an admission Record showed the facility admitted Resident #54 on 08/11/2023. The admission record showed the resident had diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, bipolar type schizoaffective disorder, muscle weakness, and drug-induced subacute dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary movements of the face, arms, or legs). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/20/2023, showed Resident #54 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, assessing the resident as cognitively intact. The MDS assessed Resident #54 as independent with bed mobility, transfers, walking in the room and corridor, locomotion on the unit, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer wound care was provided as ordered by the physician for one (Resident #311) of two residents reviewed with pressure ulcers. The census was 108. Findings included: The facility's policy titled, Pressure Ulcers, revised on 06/29/2023, revealed The purpose of this policy is to provide a description of pressure ulcers and give protocols for providing care and treatment to the resident with a pressure ulcer. The policy indicated, 7. Residents that present with a Stage IV [four] pressure are can [sic] have the following implemented but not limited to: b. If the resident has a non-draining wound, the Physician may order a wet to dry dressing or follow the recommendations of the Wound Nurse Consultant. c. If the resident has moderate to heavy drainage, the Physician may order a wound vac or wet to dry dressings which are changed more frequently. The Physician may also follow the recommendations from the Wound Nurse Consultant. A review of Resident #311's admission Record showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record for two (Resident #161 and Resident #311) of two sampled residents reviewed for urinary incontinence included the providers clinical indication for use of an indwelling urinary catheter and a physicians' orders for care of the residents' catheter. In addition, there was no documented evidence indwelling urinary catheter care was provided for Resident #311 from admission on [DATE] through April 2022. The facility census was 108. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Catheter Care, with a revision date of 06/29/2023, indicated, Purpose: The facility will ensure any resident with a urinary catheter will be maintained to prevent infection. Procedure: 1. Residents who have a urinary catheter will have physician's orders for the catheter, care, and diagnosis, i.e. [for example], neurogenic bladder, urinary retention, decubitus ulcer; to support the use of the catheter. 2. Residents with indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain orders for the use and care of a colostomy (a surgical procedure that diverted stool to an opening in the abdominal wall) for one (Resident #311) of two residents reviewed for colostomy care. Facility documentation failed to show evidence of colostomy care being provided from admission on [DATE] through April 2022. The facility census was 108. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Ostomy Care (Colostomy, Urostomy, Ileostomy), dated 07/15/2019, specified, Purpose: To keep Ostomy site area clean & pouch application to provide clean ostomy pouch for fecal/urine evacuation. Reduces odor from overuse of pouch. A review of Resident #311's admission Record showed the facility admitted the resident on 03/30/2022 with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs and the torso). A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/07/2022, showed Resident #311…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #7) of two sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care had orders for the use and care of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device. The facility further failed to ensure the CPAP contained water for use and that staff cleaned and stored the CPAP equipment appropriately. The facility census was 108. Findings included: A review of an admission Record showed the facility admitted Resident #7 on 05/27/2022. Per the admission Record, Resident #7 had a medical history to include diagnoses of sleep apnea (a condition in which breathing stopped and restarted while sleeping), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (oxygen deficiency), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/15/2023, showed Resident #7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS assessed Resident #7 as receiving oxygen therapy. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to have ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility and provide care in accordance with facility policy for one (Resident #102) of one resident reviewed for dialysis services. The facility census was 108. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Dialysis, dated 11/28/2017 and revised on 03/18/2022, indicated, The facility will ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. The facility will ensure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis and/or peritoneal dialysis consistent with professional standards of practice including the: 1. Ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. 3. Ongoing assessment and oversight of the resident before and after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and facility document reviews, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 had the skills and competencies to perform duties as required. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure LPN #1 was competent to check one (Resident #28) of six sampled residents reviewed for medication administration blood glucose levels and maintain infection control standards. The facility census was 108. Findings included: A review of the facility Nursing Services Orientation Licensed Practical Nurse/Registered Nurse indicated, 4. Skills must be performed under the Nurse providing orientation. 5. Review will take place after your orientation or at the end of your probationary period. The document further indicated, 7. The record will be kept in your file in the Human Resources Office. A review of the Check Off List for Orientation revealed competency for the skills/techniques for blood glucose monitor and standard and universal precautions were required. During medication administration observation on 09/20/2023 at 8:05 A.M., LPN #1 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #3) was free from unneccesary drugs when facility staff administered an intramuscular injection of an antipsychotic medication without adequate indications for use, when the resident became upset after requesting to speak to the administrator and being denied. Facility staff administered an antipsychotic drug medication, Haldol (used to manage positive symptoms of schizophrenia, such as hallucinations and delusions), prior to an order being obtained. The sample was three. The census was 108. Review of the facility's Indication for Use of Antipsychotic Drugs, dated July 2023, showed the following: -Policy: It is the facility's policy that each resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs, including antipsychotic drugs without adequate indications for use; -Procedure: 1. The indications for initiating, withdrawing, or withholding medications(s), as well as the use of non-pharmacological approaches, will be determined by assessing the resident's underlying condition, current signs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy to protect all residents from physical abuse when a member of the nursing staff physically assaulted a resident by striking the resident's head during care (Resident #17). The sample size was three. The census was 106. The Administrator was notified on 8/23/23, of the past non-compliance. The facility has educated all staff on their abuse and neglect policy, how and when to use therapeutic techniques for de-escalating behaviors, when to utilize their Code Green (the facility's response to emergent or emergency situation related to behaviors) and when to report incidents of abuse. The deficiency was corrected on 8/18/23. Review of the facility's abuse policy, dated 11/28/16 and last revised on 1/5/23, showed the following: -Purpose: To outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of abuse, neglect, and misuse of funds/property, and to define terms of types of abuse/neglect and misappropriation of funds and property. To ensure immediate reporting of all abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmissions of communicable disease and infections by failing to provide perineal care according to professional standards for two (Resident #40 and #86) out of three residents observed to receive perineal care and failing to provide clean, sanitary laundry service room(s). The census was 111. Review of the facility's perineal care (cleansing the portion of the body in the pelvis occupied by urogenital passages and the rectum) policy, dated 4/6/17, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that the female and male resident genital area is kept clean and proper techniques are used to prevent skin break down, infections, or any other impairments that can be caused from not using proper aseptic techniques; -Always wash from front to back to prevent spreading fecal matter from the anal area to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent gnats in the kitchen, including in the food preparation area and in the dish machine room. This had the potential to affect all residents who ate from the facility kitchen. The census was 111. Observation on 7/21/19 at 6:48 A.M., showed gnats observed to fly around in the dry storage area. The dietary manager left the dry storage and returned with a can of pesticide spray. She began spraying the pesticide spray in the dry storage area, directing the can over the drain in the center of the floor. Within two feet of the drain, sacks of flour and other paper packaged items sat on the shelves. As she sprayed the can of pesticide spray, the surveyor could smell and taste the chemical in the air. The dietary manager said she controlled the gnats by spraying over all the drains in the kitchen. You have to keep on them, so staff spray this over the drains. She continued to spray around the door and along the doorway inside the dry storage area. The food preparation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans, to address hospice services and palliative care and failed to address residents future discharge plans and goals. For 21 of 23 sampled residents (Residents #82, #109, #112, #43, #98, #19, #73, #66, #70, #28, #81, #69, #92, #53, #34, #60, #80, #87, #32, #105, and #6). The census was 111. 1. Review of Resident #82's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/25/19, showed: -Brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of a possible score of 15; -A BIMS score of 8-15, showed the resident understands and is able to make self-understood; -Independent for bed mobility, transfers, walking in room, toilet use, and dressing; -Set up help only for walk in corridor and locomotion on and off the unit; -Uses wheelchair; -Steady at all times for balance during transitions and walking; -Continent of bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-07-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance and failed to ensure food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature by failing to ensure food was cooked thoroughly, tasted appetizing, temperatures on the steam table were maintained at least at 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and tray service temperatures were maintained at least at 120 degrees F. The census was 111. Observation of residents during the lunch meal service in the main dining room, on 7/24/19 at 1:02 P.M., showed several residents observed to pick up their entrée of stuffed green peppers and eat the pepper like a sandwich. Upon closer observation, the contents of the suffered pepper appeared white and filled with rice. The green pepper appeared firm and the meat not easily discernable within the rice. A test tray was requested, which showed the food tasted cold, the rice tasted and the texture felt undercooked with bits of hard rice that crunched as the surveyor chewed. The sauce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to provide resident with access to personal and medical records pertaining to him or herself, upon an oral or written request, in the form and format requested by the individual for one resident (Resident #82) out of 23 sampled residents. The census was 111. Review of Resident #82's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/25/19, showed: -Brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of a possible score of 15; -A BIMS score of 8-15, showed the resident understands and able to make self-understood. Review of the MDS coordinator notes, dated 3/27/19, showed the resident asked about his/her medical records and he/she was told the facility has them and when the time comes for him/her to leave the facility, his/her attorney will ask for the records. Review of the resident's letter of guardianship from [NAME] County, Missouri dated 1/1/17, showed: -The guardian and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and implement written policies and procedures regarding the residents' right to formulate an advance directive and refuse medical treatment by failing to ensure residents' code status matched the code status listed on the physician's order sheet, for one of 23 sampled residents (Residents #92). The census was 111. Review of the facility's advance directive policy, date 3/21/17, showed: -There shall be documented in the resident's medical record whether the resident has executed any advance directives, and copies shall be made a permanent part of the resident's medical record; -Advance directive includes any of the following which relate to providing of health care to a resident while he/she is incapacitated: -Living will; -Durable power of attorney for health care; -Any other written document executed by the resident, signed, and dated that express the individual's health care treatment decisions; -Notification of physician: The resident's attending physician shall be timely notified by the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for three of three sampled residents (Resident #53, #163, and #93) who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare A services for rehabilitation services. The facility census was 111. 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC, form CMS-10123) is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered and the beneficiary's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that each resident receives an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment, by staff qualified to assess relevant care areas and are knowledgeable about the resident's status, needs, strengths, and areas of decline, for four residents out of 23 sampled residents (Resident #67, #88, #101, and #109). The census was 111. Review of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) Care Assessment and Individualized Care Plans policy, dated 10/1/10, showed: -Section I in the MDS is to be completed by nursing staff. The most important part of this sections deals with active diagnoses. It gives an accurate picture of the resident's health status; -Only the current diagnosis in which is being treated or monitored under doctor care and nursing assessment should be listed in this area. Must be an active diagnosis 1. Review of Resident #67's annual MDS,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident by not providing grief counseling for one resident who experienced the death of a sibling and was unable to attend the funeral (Resident #82) out of 23 sampled residents. The census was 111. Review of Resident #82's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/25/19, showed: -Brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of a possible score of 15; -A BIMS score of 8-15, showed the resident understands and is able to make self-understood; -No behaviors listed; -Active diagnoses included bipolar disorder (psychiatric illness characterized by both manic and depressive episodes, or manic ones only), seizures, and atrial fibrillation (A-fib, irregular heart rhythm). Record review of the resident's progress notes, showed: -On 1/18/19, the Social Worker was made aware the resident's brother…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs by failing to document a reason for placing one resident (Resident #6) on Ambien as well as failure to provide a rationale for reordering the Ambien. In addition, the facility failed to obtain qualifying diagnoses for the use of antipsychotic medications for five residents (#6, #88, #101, #32, and #67) of eight residents investigated for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The sample size was 23. The census was 111. 1. Review of Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/22/19, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Independent with toileting and transfers; -Required set up assistance only from staff for hygiene and dressing; -Diagnoses included orthostatic hypotension (a drop in blood pressure when changing position), diabetes, depression, and schizophrenia (a mental disorder);…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards in two out of seven medication/treatment carts. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Medication Rooms and Medication Carts Monthly Inspections Policy, dated 4/6/19, showed: -Purpose: to ensure that the facility is monitoring the labeling and storage of all medications within the facility on a routine monthly basis; -The facility will utilize a pharmacy consultant to review all resident's medication regimen and the facility's storage of medications. This will include inspections of the medication carts, treatment carts and medication rooms; -The medication carts, treatment carts, and medication rooms will be reviewed for the following areas: -Cleanliness; -Correct labeling; -Expiration dates; -Open, dated items and timeframe to be destroyed after opening. Review of the facility's Insulin Storage Policy, dated 9/22/17, showed: -Staff must date all bottles, cartridges, and pens after they are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented by not documenting diagnoses for medications on the physician order sheets for three (Resident #88, #101 and #109) residents out of 23 sampled residents. The census was 111. 1. Review of Resident #88's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/16/19, showed: -Active diagnoses included heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS), dated July 2019, showed: -Order dated 3/8/19, for Eliquis (anticoagulant) 2.5 milligram (mg), give one tablet twice a day; -Order dated 4/16/19, for Novolin (short acting insulin) 70-30 100 units per milliliter (ml), inject subcutaneous (under the skin) 37 units every morning; -The facility failed to include diagnoses for the use of the medications. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$424,748 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $81,430 — penalty dated 2026-02-17
  • $146,162 — penalty dated 2025-03-14
  • $108,179 — penalty dated 2024-12-26
  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-06-14
  • $45,311 — penalty dated 2023-12-12
  • $26,865 — penalty dated 2023-09-29
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-17 for 99 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-13 for 60 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-07 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bernard Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Bridgewood Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Brookfield Health Care CenterBrookfield, MO 1 of 5Brunswick Health Care CenterBrunswick, MO 1 of 5Carrie Elligson Gietner Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Cassville Health Care CenterCassville, MO 1 of 5Chariton Park Health Care CenterSalisbury, MO 1 of 5Crestwood Health Care CenterFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Eastview Manor Care CenterTrenton, MO 1 of 5Edgewood Manor Health Care CenterRaytown, MO 1 of 5Fair View Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Four Seasons Living CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Grand Manor Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Gregory Ridge Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Hidden Lake Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Holton Health Care CenterHolton, KS 1 of 5Legendary Health Care CenterMarshall, MO 1 of 5Milan Health Care CenterMilan, MO 1 of 5Nathan Richard Health Care CenterNevada, MO 1 of 5Nick's Health Care CenterPlattsburg, MO 1 of 5North Village ParkMoberly, MO 1 of 5Odessa Health Care CenterOdessa, MO 1 of 5Parkway Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Rest Haven Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Sarcoxie Health Care CenterSarcoxie, MO 1 of 5South County Health Care CenterArnold, MO 1 of 5Wellsville Health Care CenterWellsville, MO 1 of 5Westview Nursing HomeCenter, MO 2 of 5St Elizabeth Care CenterSaint Elizabeth, MO 2 of 5Stonecrest HealthcareViburnum, MO 3 of 5Greenville Health Care CenterGreenville, MO 3 of 5Portageville Health Care CenterPortageville, MONot rated (Special Focus)Hillside Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ATKINS, MONICAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/30/2017
DESTEFANE, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/29/1994
RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/1993

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense25% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 98%Medicare 1%Other / private 1%

About 98% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$230per resident / day
operating cost
$7,003per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$235per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265534. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next