Parkway Health Care Center
2323 Swope Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64130 · For profit - Corporation · 97 certified beds · (816) 924-1122 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (98) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $30,821 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-05)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.5% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.5% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 71.3% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.6% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 44.6% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.7% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.5% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.0% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 84.5% | 23.5% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 2.11 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 63.0 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.51 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.33 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
98 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 86 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of five sampled residents, with known diagnoses of dementia, impulsive disorder, bi-polar disorder, anxiety disorder, cognitive impairment, and who was a known elopement risk received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. On 02/28/26, the magnetic door locks and alarm failed on the secured unit. Staff assigned to supervise the resident, to ensure safety, left the resident unsupervised. The resident went out the door, located off a busy street and major highway, between 7:15 P.M. and 7:20 P.M. The resident remained unaccounted for until 03/01/26 at 2:00 P.M., when he/she was found on the public transit system in a major metropolitan area. The facility census was 69 residents.The Administrator was notified on 03/05/26 at 1:38 P.M., of Past Non-Compliance Immediate Jeopardy which occurred on 02/28/26. All staff were immediately educated on Intensive Monitoring of Residents, When to Notify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #1) from physical abuse when a staff member threw a plastic meal tray at the resident, hitting the resident on his/her upper lip and causing the resident to go to the hospital and receiving eight stiches to the space between his/her lip and nose. Facility staff failed to protect three residents (Resident #2, #3, and #10) out of 10 sampled residents, from abuse by another resident. On 5/22/24, Resident #2 self-propelled him/herself towards Resident #10 unprovoked and struck him/her in the face causing his/her nose to bleed. On 5/28/24, Resident #2 called Resident #3 a racial slur and struck the resident. In response, Resident #3 struck Resident #2 multiple times, causing two skin tears and a knot on the resident's head. The facility census was 92. The Administrator was notified on 6/4/24 at 9:44 A.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 5/29/24. On 5/30/24, the facility Interim…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #6) was free from abuse when on 5/28/26 Resident #6 was hit by Resident #7 causing a skin tear to Resident #6's right eyebrow area out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 60 residents.On 6/29/26, the Administrator was notified of past non-compliance which occurred on 5/28/26. Immediate interventions were put into place for both Resident #6 and Resident #7. All staff received education prior to their next working shift. The deficiency was corrected on 5/29/26. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy dated 6/12/2024 showed:-Abuse was the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which could include staff to resident abuse and certain resident-to-resident altercations.-It included verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage for narcotics for two sampled residents (Resident #10 and #11), when the nursing staff did not conduct a shift-to-shift count of the narcotics which resulted in missing narcotics out of 11 sampled residents. The facility census was 68 residents. On [DATE] the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the failure, and the facility took immediate action and began an investigation, in-services and education for the nurses and Certified Medication Technicians (CMT). The facility purchased a new locking box for narcotics, relocated liquid and as needed (PRN) narcotics to the nurse cart and restricted access. All changes and training were completed on [DATE]. Additional training for count on shift change and documentation was completed on [DATE]. Review of the facility Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability Policy dated [DATE] showed:-It was the policy of the facility to promote safe, high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #5, Resident #7 and Resident #11) received medications as prescribed by the physician out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 49 residents. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy dated 4/6/17 and revised on 6/26/24 showed: -Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. -It was the policy of this facility to ensure the safe and effective administration of all medications by utilizing best practice guidelines. -Sign Medication Administration Record (MAR) after administering medications. -For those medications requiring vital signs, record the vital signs onto the MAR. -Report and document any adverse side effects or refusals. 1. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill set to provide nursing and related services to ensure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for each resident. The facility assigned one nurse to be on a locked memory care unit and the Transitional Unit at the same time to pass medications, monitor resident behaviors and document such behaviors, leaving one other staff member on each unit, as a result medications were not given to the residents. The facility census was 49 residents. Review of the facility's Sufficient Staff Policy dated 5/18/24 showed: -It was the policy of the facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. -The facility's census, acuity and diagnoses of the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-22 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized service care plan that identified resident triggers and de-escalation needs to maintain the resident's highest physical, mental and psychosocial well being for one sampled resident (Resident #3) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 49 residents. Review of the facility Behavioral Contracts Policy dated 4/30/24 showed: -Residents who exhibit behaviors which could endanger themselves, other residents, or staff may benefit from a behavioral contract to ensure they are receiving appropriate services and interventions to meet their needs. -Mental disorder is a syndrome characterized by a clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in a psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning. -Mental disorders are usually associated with significant distress or disability in social, occupational, or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly complete an assessment for capacity to consent per the facility policy for one sampled resident (Resident #2) including coordination and participation with all health professionals out of 13 sampled residents who were known to engage in sexual activity. The facility census was 49 residents. Review of the facility Sexual Activity Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 5/14/24, showed: -Residents that are wishing to engage in sexual activity will be allowed to participate in these activities as long as both parties consent and have the ability to consent. Nonconsensual acts and acts of impact negatively on the resident community such as public displays shall not be allowed. -If the resident has a guardian or cognitive impairment an assessment should be completed to determine the resident's ability to consent. This assessment will be completed by the interdisciplinary team with the assistance of the resident physician and or psychiatrist as needed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a broken window on a locked behavioral and mental health unit from 3/22/25 to 4/16/25 was replaced and cleaned up. Broken glass shards were left on the unit and accessible to all residents on the unit. All resident on the unit had the potential for harm with broken glass left unattended. The facility census was 49 residents. Review of the facility Incidents and Accidents Policy dated 5/18/24 showed: -It is the policy of this facility for staff to utilize Point Click Care Risk Management to report, investigate, and review any accidents or incidents that occur or allegedly occur, on facility property and may involve or allegedly involve a resident. -Accident refer to any unexpected or unintentional incident, which results or may result in injury or illness to a resident. -Incident is defined as an occurrence or situation that is not consistent with the routine care of a resident or with the routine operation of the organization.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0557 — widespreadHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' personal possessions were maintained and failed to ensure the residents' dignity when having to wear clothes that didn't fit or were not in good repair for five sampled residents (Residents #5, #41, #42, #43, and #10) and three supplemental residents (Residents #16, #21, and #50) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Dignity and Respect, dated 6/29/23 showed: -Every resident has a right to be treated with dignity and respect. -All the residents' possessions, regardless of their apparent value to others, must be treated with respect. -Residents have the right to retain and use personal possessions to assist each resident in maintaining their independence. 1. Review of Supplemental Resident #16's care plan dated 5/30/23 showed: -The resident: --Had impaired cognitive function. --Instructions to staff to encourage as much participation by the resident as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0641 — widespreadEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) for six sampled residents (Residents #10, #43, #45, #51, #9, and #41) and one supplemental resident (Resident #16) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility policy titled MDS 3.0 Care Assessment Summary and Individualized Care Plans, revised 11/6/23, showed: -The purpose of the MDS policy was to ensure that the MDS 3.0 sections were completed accurately and in a timely manner by the responsible parties. -Section F was to be completed by the activity director. -Section F allowed the resident to determine his/her own preferences for daily activities. -Section L was to be completed by the nursing staff. -Section L was used to document any dental problems. -The MDS defined the dental health of the resident and included an assessment of mouth and facial pain.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespreadDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident or the resident's representative of meetings for care plan (a document that specified health care and supported needs and outlined how the facility met resident requirements) development, review, and revision, for seven sampled residents (Resident #47, #41, #17, #46, #33, #10, and #51) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) 3.0 Care Assessment Summary and Individualized Care Plans dated 11/6/23 showed it did not include any instructions related to inviting the resident and/or their responsible party to participate in care plan meetings. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans policy, dated 6/26/24 showed: -The purpose of the policy was to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. -It addressed measurable objectives and time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 86 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-23 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to hire an adequate number of dietary staff to safely carry out all of the functions of the food and nutrition services, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and regulations, established national guidelines, and professional standards for food service and safety. This deficient practice potentially affected all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 50 residents with a licensed capacity for 97 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observation on 10/15/24 between 2:04 P.M. and 2:52 P.M. showed the Dietary Manager (DM) was the only staff in the kitchen at that time. During an interview on 10/15/24 between 2:04 P.M. and 2:52 P.M. the DM said the following: -The dietary staff consisted of 1 morning cook and aide and 1 afternoon cook and aide. -There was not enough staff because of their low resident census. -He/She filled in the gaps in staffing as needed. Observation on 10/18/24 between 12:03 P.M. and 12:11 P.M. showed the DM was accompanied by two other staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow pre-prepared menus to ensure they met the nutritional adequacy needs of residents; failed to have basic food items in stock that were called for in their main menus; and failed to have a comparable always available or alternate foods menu posted that was nutritionally equal to the main dishes, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and regulations, established national guidelines, and professional standards for food service. This deficient practice potentially affected all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 50 residents with a licensed capacity for 97 residents at the time of the survey. Review of the 7-page Dietary Resident Rights Policy, last reviewed 11/6/23 and provided by the Administrator, showed under Section XIII. Accommodation of Needs, that Substitutes of like calorie value will be offered to the resident if the planned menu is refused. 1. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the kitchen and Dry Storage (DS) room floors clean; failed to retain operable thermometers in all refrigerators and/or freezers to confirm adequate temperature ranges; failed to maintain plastic and/or rubber cutting boards and utensils in good condition to avoid food safety hazards (cross-contamination); failed to separate damaged foodstuffs; and failed to store foodstuffs within recommended temperature parameters, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and regulations, established national guidelines, and professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 50 residents with a licensed capacity for 97 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observation on 10/15/24 between 2:04 P.M. and 2:52 P.M. during the initial kitchen inspection with the Dietary Manager (DM) showed the following: -There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-23 · tag F0813 — widespreadHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a well-known, on-site policy regarding the acceptance, usage, and storage of foods brought into the facility for residents by food delivery services, family, and/or other visitors, to ensure the food's safe and sanitary handling, storage, and consumption. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate food brought in by visitors. The facility census was 50 residents with a licensed capacity of 97 residents. 1. Observation on 10/15/24 between 2:04 P.M. and 2:52 P.M. during the initial kitchen inspection with the Dietary Manager (DM) showed there was a reach-in refrigerator in a hallway outside the kitchen and a reach-in freezer in the Dry Storage room. Review of the Dietary Resident Rights Policy, last reviewed 11/6/23 and provided by the Administrator, under Section XIII. Accommodation of Needs, read, Food purchased from vending machines, brought in by family or friends of the patient, or ordered by the resident will be considered personal property of the patient. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program policy dated 6/26/24 showed: -A system of surveillance was utilized for prevention, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon a facility assessment and accepted national standards. -The Infection Preventionist (IP) served as the leader in surveillance activities, maintains documentation of incidents, findings, and any corrective actions made by the facility. Review of the facility's Infection Control Surveillance log book for the previous 12 months showed: -No documentation of infection tracking for October 2023, November 2023. -December 2023 showed one resident had a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI - an infection of one or more structures in the urinary system). -January 2024 and February 2024 showed no documentation of any infections. -March 2024 showed three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-23 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals, qualified by completing specialized training in infection prevention and control, as the Infection Preventionist (IP) responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The facility had a census of 50 residents. A policy for Infection Preventionist was requested but not received at the time of exit. 1. Review of the facility Infection Control Surveillance log book showed the Director of Nursing (DON) completed the infection control training modules 1 - 15 on 10/19/24. The final test showed he/she did not pass the IP test. During an interview on 10/21/24 at 2:07 P.M., the DON said: -He/She was the IP for the facility. -He/She was not IP certified. -He/She had been in classes for the IP program since 10/1/24 and finished the last module on 10/17/24. -The previous DON was the previous IP. -He/She did not spend a minimum of 20 hours per week on the Infection Control Program due to also performing DON duties.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain essential kitchen cooking, cleaning, and/or storage equipment in a proper and safe operating condition to ensure the ability to meet the residents' nutritional needs in an uncontaminated and timely manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 50 residents with a licensed capacity for 97 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observation on 10/15/24 between 2:04 P.M. and 2:52 P.M. during the initial kitchen inspection with the Dietary Manager (DM) showed various kitchen appliances and equipment including, but not limited to, a chemical dishwasher, a stove with a flat-top grilling surface, and a convection oven. During an interview on 10/15/24 between 2:04 P.M. and 2:52 P.M. the DM said the following: -The stove did not work very well because they had to turn it on around 5:00 A.M. so it would be warm enough for lunch time use. -The chemical dishwasher's thermometer was broken so he/she could never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment for residents in the resident rooms and shared bathrooms. Specifically, resident rooms on the locked dementia unit #104, #105, #102, #106, #103, #101 and #207 had no toilet paper, paper towels, or soap for the residents to utilize after toileting, resident rooms on the locked dementia unit #104, #102, #106, and #105 had broken toilet paper holders, broken or missing baseboards, broken drywall, broken or dirty door vents, missing molding, and resident rooms #104 and #207 were dirty with feces and a dark brown/blackish mold-like substance on the floors and walls. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's Safe and Homelike Environment policy dated 6/5/24 showed: -Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment. -The facility will maintain bed and bath linens that are clean and in good condition. -Report any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative(s) of a transfer to a hospital, including the reasons for the transfer in writing for three sampled residents (Residents #14, #60, and #10) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the Facility's Notification of Changes Policy dated 5/14/2024 showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure that the facility promptly informed the resident, consulted the resident's physician; and notified, consistent with his/her authority, the resident's representative when there was a change requiring notifications. -The facility must have informed the resident, consulted with the resident's physician, and/or notified the resident's family member or legal representative when there was a change that required such notification. -Circumstances that required notification were a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition, such as deterioration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notification to a resident or resident representative upon transfer or discharge for three sampled residents (Resident #14, #60, and #10) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's Bed Hold Policy, date 11/6/23, showed: -When a resident was admitted to the facility, they received a copy of the bed hold policy from the admission Packet. -When a resident was discharged to the hospital or went on therapeutic leave, the facility provided a copy of the Bed Hold Policy to the resident or resident representative. -When a resident was admitted following a hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the resident will be admitted to the facility if they continue to require services from the facility and was eligible for Medicare skilled nursing facility services or Medicaid nursing facility services. 1. Review of the facility's resident discharge list dated March 2024, showed: -Resident #14 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three sampled residents (Residents #14, #9, and #41) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) 3.0 Care Assessment Summary and Individualized Care Plans, revised 11/6/23, showed there were twenty (20) areas that could become triggered areas for concern and must be addressed with individualized interventions on the plan of care for the resident. Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans dated as revised on 6/26/24 showed: -The facility staff would develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. -The care plan would include resident-specific objectives and time frames to meet the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure three sampled residents (Resident #5, #41, and #43) had assistance by the staff for oral cares, out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Activies of Daily Living, dated 5/18/24 showed: -Care and services would have been provided for the following activities of daily living; -Bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. -A resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living would have received the necessary services to maintain good oral hygiene. 1. Review of Resident #5's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility for care planning) dated 7/14/24 showed: -He/She was severely cognitively impaired. -He/She had Dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). -He/She had Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors). -He/She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests as well as the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for four sampled residents (Residents #8, #14, #9, and #41) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's Activities policy, dated 7/19/23, showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure that all residents were provided an ongoing program of activities designed to meet their interests and their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. -The activities calendar was posted on each unit and included activities that were appropriate for the general population that met the specific needs, interests, and supported the quality of life. -The activities director documented each resident's activity within the facility daily. -Documentation noted each resident's participation in activities. 1. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and comfortable environment by allowing tripping hazards to be created in at least four locations throughout the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility. Additionally the facility failed to supervise residents in the dining room, failed to safely transfer the resident off the floor and failed to have an appropriate wheelchair for one sampled resident (Resident #45) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility had a census of 50 residents with a licensed capacity of 97 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observation on 10/18/24 between 12:59 P.M. and 1:41 P.M. showed the following: -In resident room [ROOM NUMBER] there were 6 laminate floor planks that were buckling up in an approximate (app.) 36 inch (in.) diameter bubble-like bump raised up to app. 1.5 in. in height located app. 54…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing was posted correctly at the beginning of each shift where residents and visitors could easily see it. The facility census was 50 residents. The facility staffing policy was requested and not received at the time of exit. 1. Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed the required daily nursing services was: -1 Registered Nurse (RN). -1 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). -4 Certified Medication Technician (CMT)'s. -13 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)'s. Observation on 10/15/24 at 8:30 A.M., showed: -No posted staffing sheet at the entrance reception desk and glass case near the door to the [NAME] hall. -No posted staffing sheet on the [NAME] or Cherry halls. Observation on 10/16/24 at 11:18 A.M., showed: -No posted staffing sheet at the entrance reception desk and glass case near the door to the [NAME] hall. -No posted staffing sheet on the [NAME] or Cherry halls. During an interview on 10/16/24 at 11:18 A.M., CMT A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the oncoming and off going nursing staff counted the narcotics at the same time, failed to ensure the nursing staff did not pre-sign the narcotic count sheets, failed to ensure the count was correct by totaling the narcotic cards daily, failed to ensure all nursing staff was counting the narcotics, and failed to ensure the narcotic count sheets were accurate for three sampled residents (Resident #24, #2, and #11) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability policy dated 5/14/24 showed: -The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss or diversion. -Controlled substances (medications that can cause physical and mental dependence) are stored in a separate compartment of a locked storage unit (medication cart or cabinet) with access limited to approved personnel. -Controlled substances are recorded on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR-tapering of a medication dose) of a psychotropic (a medication that affected mental activity, behavior, or perception) medication was attempted for two sampled residents (Residents #41 and #51) and failed to ensure labs were drawn as ordered to provide adequate monitoring for one sampled resident (Resident #14) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's Gradual Dose Reduction of Psychotropic Drugs policy, dated 5/14/24, showed: -Residents who used psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reduction and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated. -Dose reductions and behavioral interventions were part of the medication management. -Within the first year a resident was admitted to the facility on a psychotropic medication or after the prescribing practitioner indicated the medication, the facility attempted a GDR in two separate quarters. -GDR was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked when nursing staff was not in direct observation of the medication cart, failed to ensure there were no extra objects in with the residents prescribed medications, and failed to ensure there were no loose pills in the drawers of the medication cart, The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Medication Storage Policy, dated 5/18/24 showed: -All drugs and biologicals would have been stored in locked compartments. -During a medication pass, medications must have been under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart. -Disinfectants were to have been stored separately from internal medications. 1. Observation on 10/16/24 from 9:42 A.M. to 9:48 A.M., showed: -A Certified Medication Technician (CMT) medication cart on [NAME] Hall unlocked for five minutes. -The CMT was in a resident's room out of sight of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a facility-wide infection prevention and control program that included an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic usage. Five sampled residents included in the antibiotic stewardship review out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy dated 6/29/23 showed: -The facility will track and monitor antibiotic prescribing practices and resistance patterns among its residents. -At the end of each month, the Facility Antibiotic Steward will print the Monthly Infection Log and place the report in the Antibiotic Stewardship Program binder. -All antibiotics will be entered into the Physician Orders in the electronic medical record. -The electronic medical record will be used to generate a list of all residents receiving antibiotic prescriptions and the date the antibiotic was started. -Hospital records and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided education to accept or decline the influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccine for four sampled residents (Residents #43, #46, #41, and #33) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization policy dated 5/14/24 showed: -This policy is to ensure that all residents residing in the facility are offered influenza and pneumococcal immunizations to prevent infection and the spread of communicable diseases. -As part of the admission process, the resident and/or the resident's legal representative will be provided education on the benefits and potential side effects of both the influenza and pneumococcal immunization. -The resident or their legal representative will be informed that the influenza immunizations are provided yearly (between October 1 and March 31) unless medically contraindicated. -The resident or their legal representative will be informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure provision and documentation of education regarding the benefits, risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 (a new disease caused by a novel (new) coronavirus) vaccine for residents upon admission to the facility for one sampled resident (Resident #33) out of 13 sampled residents and for two out of seven sampled staff (Employees C and E). The facility census was 50 residents. A policy for COVID vaccination for residents and staff was requested and not received at the time of exit. 1. Review of Resident #33's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation of education, administration, and/or declination of the COVID vaccine since admission to the facility. 2. Review of Employee C's employment record showed: -He/She was hired on 4/23/24. -An undated COVID declination form in his/her employee file. 3. Review of Employee E's employment record showed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required annual 12 hours of in-service training for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). The facility census was 50 residents. Policies were requested for staffing and 12-hour education/in-service and were not received at the time of exit. 1. Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed: -Facility assessment would be used to ensure there were a sufficient number of staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary to care for its residents' needs as identified through resident assessments and plans of care. -The facility was licensed for 97 beds. -The average number of occupied beds during the previous quarter was 48. -Staffing as described (in the assessment) was adequate as evidenced by: --License. --In-Services. --Performance evaluations. -Staffing was adequate for caring for residents with: --Dementia, mental health conditions, or history of trauma as evidenced by: ---In-Service training. Review of the Employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #41) who was identified as a person with limited English proficiency was provided with a means of translating into his/her language so the resident could have been fully evaluated and participated in activities on his/her unit out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. 1. Review of Resident #41's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). -Cognitive communication deficit ( a communication impairment that was caused by an underlying cognitive deficit, rather than a speech or language deficit). -Need for assistance with personal care. -The resident had a guardian. -The resident resided on a locked Memory Care unit. Review of the resident's care plan dated 6/26/24 showed: -He/She was at risk for impaired communication due to language…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) ((Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form CMS-10123) and a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) (form (CMS)-10055) was provided to the resident or their representative for two sampled residents (Residents #2 and #19) out of two sampled residents who were discharged from Medicare part A (insurance that covers inpatient hospital care, skilled nursing facility, lab tests, surgery, home health care for individuals who are [AGE] years of age and above or disabled). The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the undated Form Instructions for the NOMNC CMS-10123 form showed the NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare coverage services end. Review of the CMS memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed: -The NOMNC, form CMS-10123 is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons. -If the SNF believes on admission or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an alleged allegation of abuse was reported to the state agency within the required time frame of no later than two hours after the allegation was made for one sampled resident (Resident #23) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 6/12/24, showed: -The facility reported all allegation of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment were reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations. -Abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. -Instances of abuse that caused physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. -This included verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse. -Sexual abuse was defined as non-consensual touching of any kind. -Each resident had the right to personal privacy of not only his/her own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff for care planning) was accurate for one sampled resident (Resident #46) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. 1. Review of Resident #46's Annual MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -His/Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should have been assessed. -The BIMS summary score for level of cognition was not scored. -He/She had the following diagnoses: --Anxiety (anticipation of impending danger and dread accompanied by restlessness, tension, fast heart rate, and breathing difficulty not associated with an apparent stimulus). --Depression (a state of intense sadness or despair that has advanced to the point of being disruptive to an individual's social functioning and/or activities of daily living). During an interview on 10/23/24 at 9:24 A.M., the MDS Coordinator said: -He/She was the temporary MDS Coordinator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change comprehensive assessment within 14 days after the resident was placed on hospice (end of life care) for one sampled resident (Resident #45) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) 3.0 Care Assessment Summary and Individualized Care Plans dated 11/6/23 showed it did not include any instructions related to a significant change. 1. Review of Resident #45's MDS showed a quarterly MDS was completed on 1/24/24. Review of the resident's current physician's order sheet showed the resident admitted to hospice on 2/16/24. Review of the resident's care plan dated 3/8/24 showed: -The resident had a terminal prognosis. -Hospice services/interventions were not included in the care plan. Review of the resident's MDS showed a quarterly MDS was completed on 4/25/24. Review of the resident's MDS showed a quarterly MDS was completed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disabilities had a DA-124 level I screen (used to evaluate for the presence of psychiatric conditions to determine if a Preadmission Screening/Resident Review ((PASRR-a federal program implemented in 1987 to: Prevent individuals with mental illness (MI), intellectual disability (ID) or related conditions (RC) from being inappropriately placed in a Medicaid certified nursing facility (NF) for long-term care)) level II screen is required) and failed to ensure the follow-through of the PASRR recommendations and failed to integrate the recommendations into the care plan for two sampled residents (Resident #9 and #41) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's PASRR Assessments & DA-124 A&B policy updated 7/9/2021, showed: -The purpose of this policy is to utilize the PASRR assessment to develop a plan of care that shows continuity from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow-up regarding the resident's responsible party's request for monitoring after chemotherapy and radiation treatment for cancer and failed to clarify the resident's related diagnoses for one sampled resident (Resident #10) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. The facility did not have a policy related to this care area. 1. Review of Resident #10's census showed he/she admitted to the facility in January 2023. Review of the hospital emergency department provider note dated 1/16/24 showed the resident had a past medical history of liver cancer. Review of the resident's nurse's note dated 9/12/24 written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A showed the resident's responsible party had questions about an oncologist visit and prostate (a small gland in men that helps make semen) exam. Review of the resident's history and physical by the facility's physician dated 9/26/24 showed no diagnosis of cancer included. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two sampled residents (Resident #51 and #33) received a vision exam and glasses out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's Hearing and vision policy last revised on 6/26/24 showed: -Ensure all residents have access to vision services and receive adaptive equipment as indicated. -The facility will utilize the comprehensive assessment process for identifying and assessing a resident's vision abilities to provide person-centered care. -Employees should refer any identified need for vision services/appliances to the social worker/social service designee. -Once vision services have been identified, the social worker/social service designee will assist the resident by making appointments and arranging transportation. 1. Review of Resident #51's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 9/18/24 showed no vision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) completed by the pharmacist was reviewed and responded to by the facility physician(s) and failed to monitor for side effects of anti-psychotic (the main class of drugs used to treat people with schizophrenia) medications for two sampled residents (Resident #47 and #51) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review Policy, dated 6/26/24, showed: -Each resident was reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist. -The MRR was a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. -Review of the medical record was to prevent, identify, and resolve medication-related problems, medications errors and other recommendations. -The pharmacist communicated any irregularities to the facility physician,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine and emergency dental services to meet the needs of residents were offered for two sampled residents, (Resident #9 and #17) out of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services, updated on 6/26/24, showed: -It is the policy of the facility to assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under the State plan) and emergency dental care. -Emergency dental services include services needed to treat an episode of acute pain in teeth, gums, or palate; broken, or otherwise damaged teeth, or any other problem of the oral cavity that requires immediate attention by a dentist. -The dental needs of each resident are identified through the physical assessment and Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility staff for care planning) assessment processes and are addressed in each resident's plan of care.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to notify the next of kin timely of one sampled resident's (Resident #1) significant change of condition out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 89 residents. Review of the facility policy for Notification of Changes revised [DATE] showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure the facility promptly informed the resident, consulted the resident's physician, and notified, consistent with his/her authority, the resident's representative when there was a change in the resident's condition. -Significant changes in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition such as a deterioration in the resident's health, mental or psychosocial status. -Changes in the resident's condition could have been life-threatening conditions, or clinical complications. -In the case of a resident incapable of making decisions, the resident's family representative would make any decisions that had to be made. 1. Review of Resident #1's facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety when one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of nine sampled residents, drank an unknown liquid substance from an unmarked spray bottle. The facility census was 89 residents. The Administrator was notified on 8/2/24 of Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 7/31/24. The facility had done a safety sweep, put locks on cabinents on the unit for storage and in-serviced all nursing and housekeeping staff before the start of their next shift. The facility had corrected their deficiency 8/1/24. Review of the facility's Accidents and Supervision Policy, revised 5/18/24, showed: -The resident environment was free of accident hazards as much as possible. -Each resident received adequate supervision to prevent hazards, including: --Identify hazards and risks. --Evaluate and analyze hazards and risks. --Implement interventions to reduce hazards and risks. --Monitor for effectiveness and interventions as necessary. -The facility established and utilized a systematic approach to address resident risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one sampled resident (Resident #1) from financial exploitation when Housekeeper A received $50 from the resident for personal use out of 10 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Review of State Statute RSMo 570.145 showed: -Financial exploitation of a person with a disability - penalties - certain defense prohibited, additional violation, restitution. -A person commits the offense of financial exploitation of a person with a disability if such person knowingly obtains control over the property of the person with a disability with the intent to permanently deprive the person of the use, benefit or possession of his or her property thereby benefiting the offender or detrimentally affecting the person with a disability by: (1) Deceit; (2) Coercion; (3) Creating or confirming another person's impression which is false and which the offender does not believe to be true; (8) Undue influence, which means the use of influence by someone who exercises authority over an person with a disability in order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to local law enforcement agency when one sampled resident (Resident #1) was financially exploited out of 10 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Review of State Statute RSMo 570.145 showed: -Financial exploitation of a person with a disability - penalties - certain defense prohibited, additional violation, restitution. -A person commits the offense of financial exploitation of a person with a disability if such person knowingly obtains control over the property of the person with a disability with the intent to permanently deprive the person of the use, benefit or possession of his or her property thereby benefiting the offender or detrimentally affecting the person with a disability by: (1) Deceit; (2) Coercion; (3) Creating or confirming another person's impression which is false and which the offender does not believe to be true; (8) Undue influence, which means the use of influence by someone who exercises authority over an person with a disability in order to take unfair advantage of that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents from leaving his/her locked unit, going through the locked outer door and exiting the facility on 4/30/24. The facility census was 86 residents. On 5/7/24, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 4/30/24. The facility administration was notified on the same day of the incident and the investigation was started. The facility implemented immediate safeguards to prevent any further elopement from the locked unit. The residents' Care Plans were updated. All staff were in-serviced and visitors notices were placed. The deficiency was corrected on 5/1/24. Review of the facility's Elopement Protocol dated 4/3/24 showed an elopement would be defined as any time a resident was missing from the facility or there was a possibility that a resident had left the facility without appropriate supervision and their whereabouts were unknown. 1. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #2) was free from abuse when on 2/19/24 Resident #1 punched Resident #2 in his/her face resulting in facial hematoma (solid swelling of clotted blood within the tissues) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. A policy was requested from the facility on abuse and this was not received. On 3/1/24, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 2/19/24. The facility administration was notified on the same day of the incidents and the investigation was started. Facility staff were educated on abuse and neglect policy, resident intervention and behaviors including de-escalation before the start of the next shift. New rules were given for the smoking porch. The residents' Care Plans were updated. The deficiency was corrected on 2/20/24. 1. Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet showed he/she admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility doors were secure on the locked unit for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 87 residents. On 2/1/24, the facility Administration was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 1/23/24. Facility staff were educated on 1/23/24 and maintenance to the door was completed on 1/23/24. The deficiency was corrected on 1/23/24. Review of the facility policy titled, Elopement Protocol, dated 1/19/22 showed: -An elopement will be defined as any time a resident is missing from the facility or there is a possibility that a resident has left the facility without appropriate supervision and their whereabouts are unknown. -The first person aware of an elopement will call a Code White to the area of the believed elopement, if known. 1. Review of Resident #2's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR), dated 3/19/19, showed the following information: -Paranoid Schizophrenia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep one sampled resident (Resident #1) free from physical abuse when on 9/29/23, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A grabbed Resident #1 by the neck and left shoulder, forcing him/her to sit down in a chair with enough force to cause the chair to tip back and then CNA B placed his/her hands on the resident's shoulders in attempt to keep the resident seated in the chair, out of eleven sampled residents. The facility census was 84 residents. On 10/12/23, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred 9/29/23. The facility administration observed the incident while viewing the facility's locked dementia unit camera on 10/1/23 and immediately began the investigation. Facility staff were educated on the Abuse/Neglect Policy, Employee Burnout Policy and Behavioral Emergency Policy, including resident interventions and behaviors and reporting of abuse immediately before the start of the next shift. CNA A and CNA B were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespreadEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe medication pass and to accurately document medication administration for two out 17 sampled residents and nine out 19 supplemental sampled residents who were administrated double doses of evening medication or failed to document medication given. The facility resident census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility's Medication Administration and Monitoring Policy revised on 9/17/22 showed: -It is imperative that all medications are given using the seven rights to medication administration. --The right Resident, the right medication, the right dose, the right route, the right time the right documentation and the right dosage form. -Ensure that documentation was correct in the resident Medication Administration Record (MAR). -In a event of a medication error the resident's physician will be notified immediately and all orders and directives will be followed. -Medication error is a mistake in prescribing, dispensing, or administering medication. An error occurs when a resident receives an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the faucet of the three-compartment sink in good repair; to maintain the floor at the side and under the six burner stove free of food debris; to maintain areas of kitchen free from standing water; to maintain the ceiling and ceiling fixtures in the kitchen free of a heavy dust buildup; to ensure the salad greens in the kitchen refrigerator, were fresh; to ensure there were paper towels available at the hand washing sink; to have test strips for the sanitizing water at the three compartment sink; to ensure the thermometer was calibrated ((correlate the readings of (an instrument) with those of a standard in order to check the instrument's accuracy); to ensure utensils were stored free from food debris in the utensil drawer; to ensure two employees had their hair completely covered within a hair restraint or hair net; and to ensure a food preparation table was free from bread crumbs. This practice potentially affected all residents. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Observations on 12/5/22 from 9:31 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, failed to maintain proper infection control practices during a blood sugar check for one supplemental resident (Resident #34); failed to ensure work surface was cleaned and disinfected and maintain proper hand hygiene during medication pass for four supplemental residents (Resident #25, #76, #22 and #11); and failed to maintain the proper documentation of Tuberculosis (TB - a communicable disease that affects especially the lungs, that is characterized by fever, cough, difficulty in breathing, abnormal lung tissue and function) testing records for one sampled resident (Resident #24) out of 17 sampled residents and 17 supplemental residents and for 6 out of 10 sampled employees. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of CDC.gov's article titled Medication Preparation Questions, dated 6/20/19, showed: -The medication preparation areas were to be cleaned and disinfected any time there was evidence of soiling. Record review of the facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] free from a strong urine odor; to maintain the ceiling fans in the Memory Unit dining Room free of a buildup of dust; to ensure all light fixtures in the Memory Unit and [NAME] Dining rooms worked so they could provide illumination; to prevent a damaged sheet from being used in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]; to ensure the floors in resident rooms 33, 34 37, 105, 106, 207, 204, 310, 303, 305, 412, 411, 410, 405 and 406 were maintained clean and in good repair; to maintain the mattresses in resident rooms 34, 102 and 209 in good repair and easily cleanable; to maintain the commode seat in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] in an easily cleanable manner; to maintain the ceiling of resident room [ROOM NUMBER], free from cobwebs; to ensure the pillow in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was in an easily cleanable condition; and to ensure the vent in the [NAME] dining room was free from a buildup of dust. This practice potentially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the comprehensive care plans for one sampled resident (Resident #76) and to create a comprehensive care plan after an admission or readmission for two sampled residents (Resident #82 and #24) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans and Baseline Care Plans dated 1/19/22 showed: -The interdisciplinary team was to work together to ensure the accuracy of the information gathered. -The comprehensive care plan was to be completed within 14 days of admission. -The care plan will be oriented toward managing risk factors, evaluating treatment and outcomes of care, and using current standards of practice in the care planning process. -The nurse meetings will review behaviors and any pertinent information or changes in the resident's condition. 1. Record review of Resident #76's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted with the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hot foods (pancakes and sausage) were served at or close to a temperature at 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) at the time of service to the residents in the [NAME] dining room. This practice potentially affected at least 15 residents who ate breakfast in the [NAME] dining room. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Observation of the breakfast food service in [NAME] Dining Room on 12/5/22 from 9:58 A.M., through 10:40 A.M., showed: - At 9:59 A.M., the temperature of pancakes was 114 ºF on the steam table. - At 10:01 A.M., the temperature of the sausage patties was 105 ºF on the steam table. - At 10:11 A.M., the temperature of the sausage patties was 101.3 ºF on the steam table. - At 10:13 A.M., the temperature of the mechanical (a type of texture-modified diet in which the food was chopped for people who have difficulty chewing and swallowing to make eating safer) sausage was 114.7 ºF on the steam table. During an interview on 12/5/22 at 10:04 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the steam tables on Cherry Lane and the Memory Unit in good repair. This practice potentially affected 59 residents who resided in those areas. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Observation on 12/5/22 at 1:29 P.M., showed the steam table on Cherry Lane had two bent legs, which caused the steam table to be unsteady if it were moved. During an interview on 12/5/22 1:36 P.M., Dietary Aide (DA) A said he/she had been here for four years and the steam table has had those bent legs. During an interview on 12/5/22 at 2:57 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said the steam table had been in that condition since he/she started which was around March 2022. During an interview on 12/6/22 at 9:29 A.M., the Administrator said no one told him/her about the damage to the steam table until 12/5/22. During an interview on 12/6/22 at 9:31 A.M., the Corporate Dietary Person said the facility was in the process of looking for a new table and he/she repaired the table on 12/5/22. 2. Observation of the steam table located on the Memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system operated properly in resident rooms 33, 32, 37, 38, 39, 30, 40, 102, 106, 207, 209, 401, and the Memory Unit shower room; and to record that call lights were not operating properly in the maintenance logs at each nurse's station. This practice potentially affected 35 residents who resided in those rooms or used that shower room. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Observations with the Housekeeping Supervisor and the Maintenance Director on the Memory Unit on 12/8/22, showed: -At 10:09 A.M., the call light cords were absent in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. -At 10:16 A.M., the call light signal did not illuminate the signaling light outside the door, when the call light button was pressed at resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. -At 10:25 A.M., the call light signal did not illuminate the signaling light outside the door at resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. -At 10:30 A.M., the call light cords were absent from resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed maintain the ceiling in the dry goods storage room in good repair; to ensure the drainage in the janitor's closet across from resident room [ROOM NUMBER] operated properly; to ensure the area under the vending machines next to the elevator from the Memory Unit was free from pieces of candy and grime; to ensure the elevator well next to the kitchen, was free of spilled food;to ensure the shower rooms were free of a mildew like substance; and to repair a broken vent edging which had a sharp edge in in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. This practice affected three non-resident use areas and two residents in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Observation with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 12/5/22 at 2:32 P.M., showed two damaged areas in the ceiling above the dry-good storage room. During an interview on 12/5/22 at 2:34 P.M., the DM said one of the damaged areas was from a leak on the upper floor, potentially a shower room, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate ventilation in the Memory Unit Shower room and the shower room across from resident room [ROOM NUMBER], to remove excess moisture from those shower rooms. This practice potentially affected 59 residents who used the showers in those areas of Memory Unit and Cherry Lane. The facility census was 92 residents. Note: Exhaust air flow was tested by holding one piece of tissue paper to the ceiling vent. If the paper was sucked up then negative air flow was present; if the paper fell and was not drawn up towards the vent, then negative airflow was absent. 1. Observation with the Housekeeping Supervisor and the Maintenance Director on 12/8/22 at 10:34 A.M., showed the lack of negative airflow ventilation. During an interview on 12/8/22 at 10:36 A.M., the Maintenance Director said the ventilation needed to be repaired in the Memory Unit shower room. During an interview on 12/8/22 at 3:15 P.M., the Maintenance Director said in some areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to invite two sampled residents (Resident #45 and #58) to their quarterly care plan meetings out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans and Baseline Care Plans dated 1/19/22 showed no policy for invitation to care plan meetings. 1. Record review of Resident #45's undated face sheet showed he/she admitted with the following diagnoses: -Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM II- a complex disorder of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism that is primarily a result of a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas or resistance to insulin). -Anxiety Disorder (a psychiatric disorder causing feelings of persistent anxiety). -Chronic Pain (persistent pain last several weeks or years). Record review of the of the resident's progress note dated 11/16/22 showed: -The resident's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA a person previously identified to make decisions for an individual in the event of inability to make wishes known) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one employee, Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A, provided meal service to one sampled resident (Resident #8) out of 17 sampled residents in a dignified manner. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility's policy entitled Dignity and Respect, last reviewed on 7/9/21, showed: -Every resident had the right to be treated with dignity and respect. -All staff should speak to and treat all residents with dignity and respect. -All of the residents' possessions, regardless of their apparent value to others, must be treated with respect. 1. Observation during lunch meal service on 12/5/22 at 1:52 P.M., showed the following: -Resident #8 made a statement about wanting a second serving of the lunch meal. -CMT A got a plate of food off of the steam table and gave it to the resident in a gruff manner by shoving the food into the resident's hands, which caused the resident to take a step back, while the CMT said Here! During an interview on 12/5/22 at 2:02 P.M.,the resident, whose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a Third Party Liability (TPL) form to Missouri (MO) HealthNet within 30 days of the death of two sampled residents (Residents #96 and #97) out of six sampled residents for resident funds review. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Record review of the Admission/Discharge to/from Report dated 12/6/22 showed: -Resident #96 passed away on 8/8/22. -Resident #97 passed away on 8/19/22. During an interview on 12/6/22 at 1:06 P.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said: -Resident #97 had $6.00 in his/her account when he/she passed away and he/she submitted a form entitled a Report of Change to the Social Security Administration (SSA) to notify the SSA that Resident #97 was not a resident at the facility anymore and he/she did not fill out a TPL form. -Resident #96 had $2.00 in his/her account when he/she passed away and he/she submitted the Report of Change form to the SSA to notify the SSA that Resident #96 was not a resident at the facility anymore and he/she did not fill out a TPL form within 30 days of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained for one sampled resident (Resident #24) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident's Rights dated 4/29/21 showed personal privacy includes accommodations, medical treatment, and personal care. 1. Record review of Resident #24's undated face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgment, and impulses). -Personal History of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI- external force to the brain that causes temporary or permanent brain damage). -Delusional Disorders (a mental health condition in which a person cannot tell the difference between what is real and what is not real). -Anxiety Disorder (a psychiatric disorder causing feelings of persistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff for care planning) for one sampled resident (Resident #82) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans and Baseline Care Plans dated 1/19/22 showed: -Each discipline was to gather information that covered the observation period. -The interdisciplinary team (IDT) was to work together to verify for accuracy. 1. Record review of Resident #82's Face Sheet showed he/she was re-admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Obesity. -Hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of the resident's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -The resident received insulin seven days during the seven day look-back period (N0300). -Diabetes Mellitus (I2900) was not marked as a current diagnosis. Record review of the resident's physician's note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing home or long term care) Level I was completed for one sampled resident (Resident #24) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #24's undated face sheet showed the resident admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgment, and impulses). -Personal History of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI- external force to the brain that causes temporary or permanent brain damage). -Delusional Disorders (a mental health condition in which a person cannot tell the difference between what is real and what is not real). -Anxiety Disorder (a psychiatric disorder causing feelings of persistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one sampled resident (Resident #58) with proper Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care necessary to maintain grooming needs out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. A policy of the facility's ADL care standards was requested and not received at the time of exit. 1. Record review of Resident #58's undated face sheet showed he/she was admitted with the following diagnoses: -Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD- a gradual loss of kidney function). -Alzheimer's Disease (a slowly progressive disease of the brain that is characterized by impairment of memory and eventually by disturbances in reasoning, planning, language, and perception). -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgment, and impulses). -Personal history of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA- stroke like symptoms that do not leave permanent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, showed the facility failed complete a comprehensive fall investigation to include the root cause for one sampled resident (Resident #74) who was at risk for falls out of 17 sampled residents. The facility resident census was 92 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #74's admission face sheet showed he/she was admitted to facility with diagnose of Parkinson's disease (a chronic nervous disease characterized by a fine slowly spreading tremor, muscle weakness, muscle stiffness and a peculiar gait) and Alzheimer's disease (a slowly progressive disease of the brain that is characterized by impairment of memory and eventually by disturbances in reasoning, planning, language, and perception). Record review of the resident's Facility un-witnessed incident report dated 10/12/22 at 9:30 P.M. showed he/she had fallen, but did not have any detail description of how the resident had fallen, who found the resident, and what action was taken by facility staff for care of the resident related to the resident's fall. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to follow physician order for a specialized cup and to transcribe and obtain new physician's order recommended diet changes, for speech therapy for one sampled resident (Resident #60) out 17 sampled residents. The facility had resident census of 92 residents. 1. Record review of Resident # 60's admission face sheet showed he/she had diagnoses of a foreign body in respiratory tract, part causing asphyxiation (choking on food or drinks that became lodged in the airway or lungs of an adult patient) and a had history of a stroke that affected the resident's left side. Record review of the resident's physician communication note dated 9/29/22 at 11:38 A.M. showed: -The resident had diagnosis of Aspiration. -The resident had history of aspiration risk due to ineffective airway, dysphasia, and Congestive Hearth Failure (CHF). -It was recommended for the resident to be sent out to hospital due to breathing difficulties. -The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure machine (CPAP-a device that ensures your breathing is not obstructed through the night by continuously applying air pressure through your nose and or mouth) was transcribed onto the physician's order sheet to include the air pressure setting of the machine, the frequency of use, document maintenance of the tubing and face mask; to ensure the face mask for the CPAP remained covered when not in use to prevent cross contamination, for one sampled resident (Resident #57); and to ensure a nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen through a plastic tube into the nose in a sanitary manner) was covered when not in use for one sampled resident (Resident #76) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. A policy for storage of oxygen supplies was requested but was not provided at the time of exit. 1. Record review of Resident #57's Face Sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders were present for dialysis cares and to maintain records of dialysis communications for one sampled resident (Resident #76) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis dated 3/8/22 showed: -The facility was to assess the resident and monitor for complications before and after dialysis treatments. -The facility was to have ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis clinic. -Nurses were to monitor the bruit (a rumbling or swooshing sound caused by the high-pressure flow of blood through the fistula (a surgically created connection between an artery and vein) every shift and document on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). -Nurses were to monitor the thrill (when you place your fingers over your fistula, you should be able to feel the motion of the blood flowing through it) every shift and document on the TAR. 1. Record review of Resident #76's face sheet showed he/she was admitted with the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent for three supplemental residents (Resident #34, #22, and #11) out of 19 supplemental residents. The medication error rate was 9.8%. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Administration dated 7/9/21 showed there was no policy for insulin (a hormone produced in the pancreas that regulates the amount of glucose in the blood) pen administration. A policy of the facility's inhaler administration and medication pass policy was requested and not received at the time of exit. 1. Record Review of Resident #34's undated face sheet showed he/she admitted with the following diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM II- a complex disorder of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism that is primarily a result of a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas or resistance to insulin). Record review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated December 2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the dietary staff failed to follow the recipe for pureed (cooked food that has been ground pressed, blended or sieved to the consistency of a creamy paste or liquid) chicken and to follow the recipe to make gravy for mechanical (a type of texture-modified diet in which the food was chopped for people who have difficulty chewing and swallowing to make eating safer) chicken. This practice potentially affected two residents with pureed diets and five residents with mechanical soft diets. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Record review of the undated recipe for five servings of pureed baked chicken showed: - 5 servings of prepared chicken. - 1/2 teaspoon (tsp) chicken base. - 5 ounces (oz.) of water. - 1 ¼ tablespoon commercial thickener. Directions: - Measure number of pureed portions required from the regular recipe. - Add to food processor and process to a fine consistency. - Prepare broth by dissolving soup base in boiling water. - Combine hot broth and thickener. - Gradually add to meat while processing. - Scrape down side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the outdoor dumpster lids were closed on 12/5/22 and 12/6/22, and failed to ensure the kitchen trash container was maintained closed when it was not being actively used by dietary staff. This practice affected one outdoor area and the kitchen area. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Observations on 12/5/22 at 8:31 A.M., 10:44 A.M., 12:15 P.M. and 4:11 P.M., and on 12/6/22 at 7:55 A.M. and 10:31 A.M., showed the lid of the outdoor dumpster was not closed. During an interview on 12/6/22 at 10:33 A.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said he/she would have to remind facility staff to close the dumpster lids when they threw trash into it. 2. Observations on 12/5/22 at 9:34 A.M., 10:43 A.M., 11:22 A.M., and 2:40 P.M., showed one trash container in kitchen with an open lid. During an interview on 12/6/22 at 2:52 P.M., the DM said the trash container should be closed.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prevent the presence of gnats (small flies) under the automated dishwasher area in the kitchen, an unlabeled room in the Memory Unit and in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. This practice potentially affected two non-resident use areas and three residents in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Observation on 12/5/22 at 10:51 A.M., showed numerous gnats under dishwasher flying around and crawling around standing water that was present under the automated dishwasher. During an interview on 12/6/22 at 9:31 A.M., the Corporate Dietary Person said the drainage box for the automated dishwasher was pushed in too far and caused the water to overflow on to the ground. 2. Observation with the Housekeeping Supervisor and the Maintenance Director on 12/8/22 at 11:01 A.M., showed numerous gnats which flew around in an unlabeled room just off the Memory Unit dining room. During an interview on 12/8/22 at 11:01 A.M., the Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2020-01-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and provide residents appropriate, alternative food substitutes that were nutritionally consistent with the usual and/or ordinary food items provided by the facility and to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #84) was provided an alternate meal consistent with his/her dietary Physician's orders. The facility census was 92 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Record review of Resident #84''s Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's Care Plan dated 3/02/19 showed he/she was independent with eating and able to feed himself/herself without issues. Record review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated tool required to be completed by the facility staff for care planning) dated 10/11/19 showed he/she: -Was cognitively intact. -Needed set up help and supervision with eating. Record review of the resident's Dietician's Notes dated 12/20/19 showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to determine refrigerated food storage temperatures; to store opened food in a sanitary manner; to determine whether sanitary conditions were met for food and non-food contact surface areas before, during and after food preparation; to maintain a sanitary manual can opener blade; to maintain refrigerated units in a sanitary condition; to store kitchen equipment in a sanitary manner and to adhere to hygienic practices. These deficient practices of not determining food storage temperatures and not storing opened food in a sanitary manner, and of not maintaining food and non-food contact surfaces in a sanitary, storing kitchen equipment in an unsanitary manner and not practicing hygienic techniques, could potentially, promote microorganisms and bacterial growth which could adversely affect the health and well-being of the residents and staff who partook of the meals prepared by the dietary staff. The facility census was 92 residents at the time of the survey. Record review of the dietary's daily cleaning checklist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen trash was emptied in a timely fashion to prevent the potential harborage and feeding of pests. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Observation on 1/21/20 at 9:07 A.M., and at 11:05 A.M., showed the kitchen trash container's lid was open with trash overflowing the trash container and could not be closed due to the amount of trash in the container. During an interview on 1/21/20 at 9:13 A.M., the Dietary [NAME] said that this was a common occurrence every morning, where the dietary staff did not empty the trash container from the night before. 2. Observation on 1/27/20 on 5:09 A.M., showed the kitchen trash container's lid was open and could not be closed due to the amount of trash in the container. Record review of the 2013 edition of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, Chapter 5-501.16, showed, (A) An inside storage room and area and outside storage area and enclosure, and receptacles shall be of sufficient capacity to hold REFUSE, recyclables, and returnables that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nebulizer and mouth piece was stored in a manner to prevent contamination for one sampled resident (Resident #78) and to ensure an annual review of the facility's infection prevention and control program (IPCP) out of 19 sampled residents . The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility Infection Control Program policy dated 11/28/16 showed: -The purpose of the policy is to ensure the facility's infection control program provides written standards including policies and procedures that identifies, prevents and monitors possible communicable diseases or infections before they can spread to other persons in the facility. -The facility Infection Control Program includes the following policies, but not limited to: --Handwashing Policy. --Gloving Policy. --Pericare Policy. --Linen Policy. --Isolation Policy. --Immunization Policies (Tuberculosis, Hepatitis, Pneumococcal, Influenza). --Mini Quality Assurance Policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the right to self-determination and choices by failing to provide access to beverages throughout the day for three sampled residents (Resident's #55, #84 and #74); to honor resident requests for fresh fruit; to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #41) receives more to eat after communicating he/she is still hungry and to provide requested juice to one sampled resident (Resident#79). This potentially effected all residents who come to the common dining areas for beverages and meals. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility's admission Agreement revised 10/13/11 showed: -The resident had the right of free choice. -The resident shall not have their personal lives regulated or controlled beyond reasonable adherence to meal schedules. A policy was requested from the facility regarding choices with food and beverages. The facility did not have a policy. 1. Observation on 1/27/20 at 6:36 A.M., through 7:14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Employee Disqualification List (EDL) and Criminal Background Check (CBC) were completed in accordance with the state regulation and facility policy on three out of seven employees sampled. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility policy titled Screening-Applicant, Employee, Volunteer and Vendor (Missouri), effective 01/01/2016 showed Human Resource staff were required to complete identified screens, prior to hire. The required screens included a request for criminal records check, Family Care Safety Registry, Employee Disqualification List, and Certified Nurse's Aide registry verification. Record Review of the Missouri Revised Statute Chapter 660, Section 660.317 showed, prior to allowing any person who has been hired as a full time part time or temporary position to have contact with any patient or resident, the provider shall, or in the case of temporary employees hired through or contracted for an employment agency, the employment agency shall prior to sending a temporary employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-29 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) was accurate, completed timely, and was the correct type of assessment for six sampled residents (Resident's #6, #58, #65, #87, #46 and #78) out of 19 sampled resident's. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 1/21/19 showed he/she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Schizophrenia (a long-term mental disorder of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion, and a sense of mental fragmentation). -Cognitive communication deficit (when a person has difficulty communicating because of injury to the brain that controls the ability to think). Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-29 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) was accurate, completed timely, and was the correct type of assessment for eight sampled residents (Resident's #2, #35, #1, #87, #65, #46, #58 and #78) out of 19 sampled resident's. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 1/21/19 showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: -Schizophrenia (a long-term mental disorder of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion, and a sense of mental fragmentation). Record review of the resident's assessments showed: -An entry tracking form was completed in May 2018. -An admission assessment was completed in May of 2018.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was completed and was an accurate and appropriate plan of care for five sampled residents (Resident #35, #74, #88, #55, and #78) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans dated 4/6/17 and updated on 10/1/18 showed: -The facility must develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. -The comprehensive care plan must be completed within 14 days of admission. -The facility will use the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual 3.0 as a reference to help look at the residents holistically, as individuals for whom quality of life and quality of care are mutually significant and necessary. -All residents will have a comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic stewardship program that utilized protocols for antibiotic use in the facility. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy dated 11/28/17 showed: -The purpose of the policy was to optimize antibiotic use in the facility and reduce unnecessary use of laboratory tests and antibiotics using a systematic approach. -The Facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) will work closely with the Facility Administrator, facility nurses, physicians and prescribing practitioners to ensure the success of the ASP. -The facility ASP will use a systematic evaluation of ongoing treatment which includes, but is not limited to: --The facility will track and monitor antibiotic prescribing practices and resistance patterns among residents. --The Antibotic Steward will ensure that the medical record of each resident includes the dose, duration and indication for every antibiotic prescription. --Each month the Antibiotic Utilization Report will be reviewed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a current copy of the residents' Advanced Directive (legal documents that allow individuals to spell out their decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) was maintained in the resident's medical record for one sampled resident (Resident #88) and to ensure two sampled residents (Resident #84 and #78) were offered the right to formulate advanced directives out of 19 sampled residents. The facility's census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility policy Advanced Directives, effective 11/16/2018 showed: -Individuals have the right to make decisions concerning provided care, which, included the right to accept, or, refuse medical, or, surgical treatment, and the right to input in formulated advance directives, as permitted under state statutory and case law. -There is to be documentation in the resident's medical record, whether, the resident has executed any advance directives, and copies shall be permanently placed in the respective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) (form CMS-10055) was fully completed or given for two sampled residents (Resident #44 and #55) out of three sampled residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services and remained in the facility. The facility had five residents who discharged from Medicare Part A services in the last six months. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09 showed: -If the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered and the beneficiary's potential liability for payment for the non-covered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility staff for care planning) for two sampled residents (Resident #74 and Resident #78) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 93 residents. Record review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated May 2013, P-1 showed a physical restraint is any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. 1. Record review of Resident #74's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of nicotine dependence, cigarettes. Record review of the resident's Care Plan dated 7/18/19 and updated periodically showed he/she did not have a smoking care plan. Record review of the resident's annual MDS dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I and Level II was completed for one sampled resident (Resident #87) having developmental disability, out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Division of [NAME] Services and Regulation Level One Nursing Facility Pre-admission Screening for Mental Illness/Mental Retardation (now known as intellectual disability) or Related Condition (DA-124C) guide, dated 9/2017 showed Major Mental Disorder diagnoses included Bipolar Disorder (formerly called manic-depressive illness or manic depression is a mental disorder that causes unusual shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, concentration, and the ability to carry out day-to-day tasks). Record review of https://health.mo.gov/seniors/nursinghomes/pasrr.php, updated 4/2018 showed: -The Pre-admission and Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for one sampled resident's (Resident #78) antibiotic eye medication had a stop date, out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #78's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's Physician's Orders Sheet (POS) dated 1/15/20 showed: -Gentamycin (antibiotic) 3 milligrams (mg)/milliliter (mL) eye drops, instill two drops into right eye twice daily dated 9/27/19. -A notation that there was no stop date for the antibiotic eye drops. -No diagnosis related to why the resident was using the antibiotic eye drops. Record review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 1/15/20 showed: -Gentamycin (antibiotic) 3 milligrams (mg)/milliliter (mL) eye drop, instill two drops into right eye twice daily dated 9/27/19. -A notation that there was no stop date for the antibiotic eye drops. -No diagnosis related to why the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-29 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an assessment that include attempted alternative interventions prior to the use of side rails and to ensure documented informed consent (permission given in the full knowledge of the possible risks and benefits of an intervention) for the use of side rails, including specific risks of side rail use for four sampled residents (Resident's #41, #84, #88 and #78) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. A policy was requested and the facility did not have a policy regarding the use of side rails. 1. Record review of Resident #41's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: -Muscle weakness. -Abnormal posture. -Lack of coordination. -Encephalopathy (any abnormal condition of the structure or function of brain tissues, especially chronic, destructive, or degenerative conditions). Record review of the resident's Side Rail assessment dated [DATE] showed: -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post the actual hours worked for Registered Nurses (RN's), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN's), and Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA's) directly responsible for resident care per shift and the resident census on three of three resident living areas. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Observation on the following dates, and times and locations showed posted staffing did not include actual hours worked for RN's, LPN's and CNA's and did not include the resident census: - 1/21/20 at 9:21 A.M. on [NAME] Lane. - 1/21/20 at 12:05 P.M. on Memory Lane. - 1/21/20 at 12:44 P.M. on Cherry Lane. - 1/23/20 at 9:18 P.M. on Cherry Lane. - 1/23/20 at 1:10 P.M. on Memory Lane. - 1/23/20 at 1:27 P.M. on [NAME] Lane. - 1/24/20 at 10:00 A.M. on Memory Lane. - 1/27/20 at 6:28 A.M. on [NAME] Lane. - 1/27/20 at 7:00 A.M. on Memory Lane. - 1/27/20 at 11:48 P.M. on Cherry Lane. - 1/28/20 at 1:00 P.M. on Memory Lane. - 1/28/20 at 1:18 P.M. on Cherry Lane. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident monthly pharmacy drug regimen recommendations were reviewed and acted upon by the physician and to ensure the pharmacy requests were completed timely per the facility policy for two sampled residents (Resident #84 and #88) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility policy titled Monthly Drug Regimen Review, effective 11/28/2016 showed: -Drug regimens are reviewed monthly for each resident and are completed by consulting pharmacists, or pharmacy agents. Findings are documented and irregularities are noted in writing. -Nursing Staff forward pharmacist recommendation to the physician within 48 hours of receiving documentation from pharmacist and document date/time that physician is sent pharmacy recommendation. - If no response is given from physician, within 7 days, Nursing Staff must communicate with physician's office to obtain needed orders, if indicated. -Physicians must indicate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary anti-anxiety Pro Re Nata (PRN-as needed) medications (medications which affect psychic function, behavior, or experience) were limited to 14 days unless evaluated by the resident's physician, and failed to complete non-pharmacological interventions (alternative therapies such as comfort therapy) prior to administering the medications and failed to document the reason the medication was administered and the effect of the medication for two sampled residents (Resident #74 and #78) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the facility policy titled PRN Antipsychotic Medication and Psychotropic Medications, effective 11/28/2017 showed: -PRN orders for antipsychotic drugs are limited to 14 days and are not to be renewed unless the prescriber has evaluated the appropriateness of the that medication for the resident; and -PRN psychotropic medication may be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided for one sampled resident (Resident #84) whose dentures were in poor repair out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #84's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's Care Plan dated 3/2/19 showed he/she was independent with eating and wore dentures. Record review of the resident's Social Services Quarterly Notes dated 6/28/19 showed: -The resident notified the Social Services Director (SSD) of problems with his/her dentures. -The SSD contacted a dental service related to the concern with the resident's dentures. Record review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 10/11/19 showed the resident: -Was cognitively intact. -Was edentulous (no teeth). Record review of the resident's Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper texture of pureed food for one sampled resident (Resident #41) with swallowing issues out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Record review of the undated facility policy titled Therapeutic Diets, showed: -Therapeutic diets are prepared and served as prescribed by attending physician. -Resident's with clinically indicated dysphagia pureed diets are to receive foods blended to a pudding like consistency, which, includes bread and bakery products. -Cream of [NAME] is used in place of rice and corn is to be avoided. 1. Record review of Resident #41's Face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnosis of dysphagia (inability or difficulty swallowing). Record review of the resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated tool required to be completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 11/23/19 showed he/she: -Was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$30,821 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $14,020 — penalty dated 2026-03-05
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-06-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| RELIANT CARE GROUP LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2016 |
| RCG INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2016 |
| RICHARD J. DESTEFANE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2018 |
| DESTEFANE, RICHARD | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2018 |
| RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/28/2025 |
| ARSHAD, ABDULLAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/15/2024 |
| HONDERICK, JUSTIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/17/2025 |
| KC MANOR ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2016 |
| TLG II LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265532. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.