No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bernard Care Center

4335 West Pine Blvd, Saint Louis, MO 63108 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 141 certified beds · (314) 371-0200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 371-0200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568)$37,388 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $37,388 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-18)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
4205 Forest Park Ave · (314) 286-0800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4218 Lindell Blvd · (314) 371-4286 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Schnucks0.3 mi
4171 Lindell Blvd · (314) 533-8027 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4210 Forest Park Ave · (314) 535-1100 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4359 Lindell Blvd · (314) 328-6068

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.3%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms83.7%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.1%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.7%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.6%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.2%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table39.5%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.2%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.9%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.622.111.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.252.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
19.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 19.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.8–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge19.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge19.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge23.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.11
RN hours/ resident / day
0.32
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
1.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.08
RN hoursweekends
45.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 131.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.11 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.56 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.06 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-19)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

69 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a licensed nurse in the facility to care for resident's basic needs for approximately five and a half hours, during the overnight shift that began on May 30, 2026. This practice had the potential to affect all residents who required skilled nursing care during the timeframe of 2:00 A.M. through 7:32 A.M. on May 31, 2026. The sample was 10. The census was 126. 1. During an interview on 6/10/26 at 9:30 A.M., the Administrator said she has been on her own for about a month with no Director of Nursing (DON). There is an interim type of nursing staff but she has never worked in long term care. They are hosting a job fair today and hopefully will get some applicants. She said they need a night nurse, that would help. 2. During an interview on 6/10/26 at 12:00 P.M., the Staffing Coordinator said typically there are only two nurses on the overnight shift which are 200 and 300 halls. The 200 nurse covers 100 hall and 200 hall. The 300 hall nurse covers 300 hall and 400 hall. If the 200 or 300 nurse calls in to work then they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0555 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the rights of residents to choose their own physician. The facility discontinued services with Physician A, who provided care to 35 residents, 31 of whom expressed a desire to continue care with Physician A. Five of the 31 residents were sampled and it was found the facility failed to coordinate continued access for care for all 5 (Residents #4, # 5, #6, #2, and #3). The sample was 6. The census was 127.Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 9/21/25, showed the following:-Purpose: To ensure that resident rights are protected;-Resident Rights Under Social Security Act: Resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside facility. Facility must protect and promote rights of each resident, including each of the following rights:--Notice of Rights and Services: Facility must inform resident both orally and in writing in a language that resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' code status with Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR, an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions if the heart stops beating or the person stops breathing) or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR, does not want CPR) were verified upon admission and documentation maintained in the medical record for 13 out of 29 sampled residents (#2, #5, #7, #9, #12, #14, #15, #20, #35, #113, #115, #120, #138). The facility census was 131.Review of the facility's Communication of Code Status policy, revised [DATE], showed:-Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance with these rights, this facility will implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status to those individuals who need to know this information;-Policy: The facility will follow facility policy regarding a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment throughout the facility. The facility failed to ensure noise levels were comfortable when the overhead announcements were too loud and the door to the smoking area slammed, for two residents (Residents #108 and #79). One resident (Resident #4) had soiled briefs on the bathroom floor. One resident had a clogged toilet (Resident #11). In addition, the facility failed to provide clean and well-maintained walls, floors, doors, and windows for the 400 locked unit, 300 hall, 100 hall, 200 hall, lobby, hospitality room, and Southern dining room. The facility census was 131.Review of the facility's Safe and Homelike Environment Policy, last reviewed on 6/5/25, showed:-Purpose: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the residents to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible;-Environment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were updated and accurate to reflect resident needs for 3 of 29 sampled residents (Residents #5, #6, and #100). The census was 131. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy, dated 10/21/24, showed:-Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment;-Procedure: The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care. Services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, shall be culturally-competent and trauma-informed;-The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed by failing to obtain yearly electrocardiograms (EKG, a test that records the heart's electrical signals to check the rate, rhythm, and overall function) as ordered for eight residents (Residents #4, #13, #14, #16, #35, #75, #83 and #115). In addition, the facility did not ensure recommendations were followed for a palliative care referral for one resident (Resident #120). The sample was 29. The census was 131. Review of the Following Physician's Orders policy, revised 5/18/24, showed:-Purpose: To ensure that all physician's orders are followed. To ensure a process is in place to monitor nurses in accurately transcribing and following physician orders;-Procedure:--Upon receiving a physician order, it will be documented in the electronic medical record (EMR) in the orders section;--After diagnostic testing and other services are ordered, the nurse will document orders in the medical record and fill out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the restorative nursing program (RNP) policy and ensure residents who had limited mobility received restorative nursing services to promote and maintain the residents' highest practical wellbeing (Residents #3, #16, #75 and #83). In addition, the facility did not have a functional restorative nursing program to ensure recommended restorative nursing exercises were provided on a continual basis. The facility did not have a system in place to ensure residents received assessments and referrals for restorative therapy. The sample was 47. The census was 131. Review of the restorative nursing program policy, reviewed 4/30/24, showed:-Purpose: To provide maintenance and restorative services designated to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level;-Definition: The restorative nursing program refers to nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund account and by not reconciling each month. The facility also failed to ensure resident accounts did not have negative balances for three residents (Residents #88, #80 and #55). The facility managed funds for 105 residents. The facility census was 131.1. Review of the facility maintained attempted reconciliation forms for the period of 12/1/24 through 11/30/25, showed the attempted reconciliations did not reconcile to the residents' current balance at the time of reconciliation:-December 2024: -Ending balance per bank statement: $190,580.09; -Current balance per trust report: $167,812.94; -January 2025: -Ending balance per bank statement: $184,920.61; - Current balance per trust report: $114,518.60; -February 2025: -Ending balance per bank statement: $119,205.92; -Current balance per trust report: $97,453.71; -March…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment for one resident (Resident #20) timely as required. The sample was 29. The facility census was 131.Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 2, Assessments for the RAI, showed the following information: -The annual assessment is an OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed on an annual basis (at least every 366 days) unless an SCSA (Significant Change in Status Assessment) or an SCPA (Significant Correction to Previous Assessment) has been completed since staff completed the most recent comprehensive assessment; -The annual assessment ARD is the ARD of previous OBRA comprehensive assessment plus 366 calendar days, and ARD of previous OBRA Quarterly assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to assess residents using the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, no less frequently than once every 92 days as directed by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for one resident (Residents #120) out of 29. The facility census was 131. Review of the Resident Assessment Manual (RAI), dated 10/1/17, showed the Quarterly assessment is an Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA) non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored. As such, not all MDS items appear on the Quarterly assessment. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) must be not more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent OBRA assessment of any type. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 59 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) accurately reflected the resident's status of having a life expectancy of less than 6 moths when they received hospice services (a service provided when a resident has a condition indicating a life expectancy of less than 6 months as certified by the hospice physician) for one of one hospice resident investigated for hospice services (Resident #6). The census was 131. Review of the facility's MDS policy, dated 11/6/23, showed Section J (Health Conditions) is to be completed by Nursing Staff. This section addresses any condition that impacts the resident's quality of life and functional status. Used to identify the number of health conditions that impact the resident's functional status and quality of life. Other areas in this section to assess are, dyspnea (difficulty breathing, tobacco use, prognosis, problem conditions and falls.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a mental health disorder and/or individuals with intellectual disabilities had a DA-124 Level One Screen (used to evaluate for the presence of psychiatric conditions to determine if a Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASARR) Level Two Screen was required), as required for one of three residents sampled (Resident #113) for PASARR. The sample was 29. The census was 131.Review of Resident #113's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/28/25, showed:-Entry date: 6/24/14;-readmitted : 2/4/14;-Diagnoses included depression, psychotic disorder and schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). Review of the resident's face sheet, showed diagnosis of other specified mental disorders due to known physiological condition. An on-set date, 5/8/24, showed diagnoses of major depressive disorder and disorganized schizophrenia. Review of the resident's medical records, showed:-No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received activities of daily living (ADL) care for four sampled residents (Residents #27, #120, #5, and #6). The sample was 29. The census was 131.Review of the facility's Nail Care policy, revised 6/26/24, showed:-Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the provision of care to resident's nails for good grooming and health;-Policy: Assessment of resident nails will be conducted on admission and readmission to determine the resident's nail condition, needs, and preferences. Report unusual or abnormal conditions of the nails to the physician and the responsible party (curling, color changed, separation form the nail bed, redness, bleeding, pain, odor, infection). Identify conditions that increase risk for foot or nail problems, such as diabetes, peripheral vascular disease (PVD, a lack of blood flow in the legs caused by narrowing of the blood vessels), heart failure, kidney disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health for five residents (Resident #128, #105, #45, #17 and #1). The sample was 29. The census was 131.Review of the facility's Podiatry (foot) Services policy, revised, 5/14/24, showed:-Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to ensure residents receive proper treatment and care within professional standards of practice and state scope of practice, as applicable, to maintain mobility and good foot health;-Policy: Foot care that is provided in the facility, such as toenail clipping for residents without complication disease processes, shall be provided by staff who have received education and training to provide this service. Residents requiring foot care who have complication disease processes will be referred to qualified professional such as a podiatrist (foot doctor). Employees should refer an identified need for foot care to the Social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained for feeding tube water flushes and to ensure staff documented the date and time tube feeding formula was hung for one of two residents sampled with feeding tubes (Resident #120). The facility census was 131. Review of the facility's Following Physician's Orders policy, revised 5/18/24, showed:-Procedure: Upon receiving a physician's order via telephone, fax, written order, verbal order, transcribed order or other, it will be documented in residents' electronic medical records in the Orders section;-Clarification of physician's orders will be obtained if the order is either unclear or the nurse is uncomfortable in implementation of the physician's orders;-The nurse in charge of medication administration must review all their designatedMedication Administration Records (MARs) and Treatment Administration Record (TARs) prior to the end of their shift to ensure that all medications/treatments scheduled to be given on their shift were administered according to the physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided for one of 29 sampled residents who experienced pain and reported it to staff per their policy. In addition, the facility failed to report the resident's pain to the nurse (Resident #120). The census was 131.Review of the facility's Pain Management policy, revised 6/26/24, showed:-Purpose: The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences;-Policy: The facility will utilize a systematic approach for recognition, assessment, treatment and monitoring of pain;-Recognition of pain: In order to help a resident attain or maintain his/her highest practicable level of physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and to prevent or manage pain, the facility will: Recognize when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when the pain can be anticipated; Manage or prevent pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's arterial venous (AV) fistula (a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein that is accessed during hemodialysis, an invasive procedure that cleanses the blood of impurities) was assessed by a licensed nurse, for one out of one dialysis resident sampled (Resident #101). The census was 131.Review of the facility's Hemodialysis policy, last revised, 5/14/24, showed:-Purpose: The facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences, to meet the special medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis;-Care for the resident on dialysis: The nurse will monitor and document the status of the resident's access site upon return from the dialysis treatment to observe for bleeding or other complications. Review of the Resident #101's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain medications identified as to be destroyed in the 300 hallway medication room in a safe and secure location inaccessible by unauthorized staff. This affected one of two observed medication storage rooms. The census was 131.Review of the Medication Destruction policy, revised [DATE], showed:-Purpose: To ensure that medications that cannot be returned to the dispensing pharmacy are destroyed;-Policy: -Any medication that is to be destroyed is to be locked in a separate cabinet and labeled to be destroyed. No other items, medications or treatments are allowed to be stored in the to be destroyed cabinet;---Medications should not be in an unsecured area to be handled at a later time. It must be immediately placed in the to be destroyed cabinet or destroyed:--For example, a single use vial may contain two milliliters (ml) of a drug and the resident is only prescribed 1 ml. In this case, the 1 ml must be destroyed;--Another example is an oral medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were followed up on in a timely manner for one of five sampled residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations (Resident #2). The facility census was 131. Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review (MMR) policy, revised 6/26/24, showed:-Purpose: The drug regimen of each resident is reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and includes a review of the resident's medical chart;-Timelines and responsibilities for Medication Regimen Review: The consultant pharmacist shall schedule at least one monthly visit to the facility, and shall allow for sufficient time to complete all required activities;-The pharmacist shall communicate any recommendations and identified irregularities via written communication within 10 working days of the review;-If the pharmacist should identify an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect a resident, the DON or designee is informed verbally;-The pharmacist will complete the MRR, and ensure this is documented into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable and appetizing temperature during tray service by failing to maintain the temperature of hot food at least at 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and failed to ensure food was palatable for two of 29 sampled residents (Residents #11 and #13). The census was 131. Review of the facility's dietary food preparation policy, dated 7/5/23, showed:-Food temperatures: foods will be served at proper temperature to ensure food safety;-Acceptable serving temperatures: eggs should be between 135 degrees F and 155 degrees F. Meat should be 135 degrees F;-If temperatures are not at acceptable levels and cannot be corrected in time for meal service, make an appropriate menu substitution and discarded out of temperature range foods. 1. Review of Resident #11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/4/25, showed:-Diagnoses included major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and vaccinate eligible residents for the pneumococcal (pneumonia caused by bacteria) vaccine for two out of five residents sampled for immunizations (Resident #28 and Resident #18). The census was 131.Review of the facility's Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations policy, last revised on 5/14/24, showed:-The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all residents residing in the facility are offered influenza and pneumococcal immunizations to prevent infection and the spread of communicable disease;-As part of the admission process, the resident and/or the resident's legal representative will be provided education on the benefits and potential side effects of both the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations;-The resident or their legal representative will be informed that the pneumococcal immunization will be offered upon admission or per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. The pneumococcal immunization will not be given in the immunization is medical contraindicated, the facility has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in a safe and operable working condition by not maintaining a consistently operating elevator. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. In addition, one resident (Resident #2) did not have access to his/her wheelchair while being repaired because the repair needed to occur in the lower level of the facility, and the resident did not have access to an alternate wheelchair during the repair. The sample size was 29. The facility census was 131.Review of Resident #2's face sheet, showed:-admitted on [DATE];-Diagnoses included high blood pressure, chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), acquired absence of right leg below the knee, and acquired absence of left leg below the knee.Review of the resident's care plan, in use during survey, showed:-Problem: Resident has limited physical mobility and needs assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). He/She needs encouragement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0923 — isolated
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an appropriate exhaust system to remove cigarette smoke from the facility's indoor smoke room. This affected all residents who sat in the 300 Hall dining room or walked from the 300 Hall to the 400 Hall. The facility census was 131.Review of the facility's Safe and Homelike Environment policy, last revised on 6/5/25, showed:-Purpose: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment;-Environment refers to any environment the facility that is frequented by residents, including hallways and dining rooms;-General considerations: Have adequate outside ventilation by means of windows, or mechanical ventilation or a combination of the two. 1. Observations of the smoke room on 12/15/25 at 11:50 A.M. and 6:00 P.M., 12/16/25 at 11:06 A.M.,1:24 P.M. and 3:41 P.M., 12/17/25 at 7:45 A.M., 8:49 A.M., and 3:00 P.M., 12/18/25 at 9:59 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. and 12/19/25 at 7:30 A.M. showed:-Multiple residents and staff entered and exited the smoke…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all corridors had handrails and failed to ensure existing handrails were securely affixed to the wall. The census was 131.Review of the Facility Area Audit, Preventative Maintenance Inspection, undated, showed handrails listed as an item for staff to inspect. 1. Observation of the 100 Hall on 12/16/25 at 8:16 A.M., showed:-No railings between room [ROOM NUMBER] and the 100 hall dining room;-No railings around the perimeter of the 100 hall nurse's station;-Broken railing that pulled away from the wall outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. Observation of the 400 Hall on 12/16/25 at 10:42 A.M., showed:-No railing outside the enclosed nurse's station;-Loose railing to the right of the nurse's station window;-Loose railing outside of room [ROOM NUMBER];-Loose railing pulled away from the wall between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Observation on 12/16/25 at 11:05 A.M., showed a staff member stood next to a resident who held on to the handrail outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide catheter care consistent with physician orders when staff flushed the suprapubic catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder used to drain urine continuously) of one of six sampled residents. The sample was 6. The census was 127. Review of facility's admission Checklist for new/readmits in Point Click Care (PCC, an electronic healthcare software program that maintains resident assessments, care planning, scheduling, medication and treatment administration, medical records), no date, showed: -If Foley catheter or suprapubic catheter is present, all orders must include: -Size of catheter; -Flush order with sterile water, 60 cubic centimeters (cc), as needed (PRN); -Diagnosis for Foley; -Catheter care every shift, to include daily dressing changes if a suprapubic catheter; -Change catheter monthly and as needed; -Skin assessment at Foley insertion site daily. Review of facility's Suprapubic Catheter Care Policy, revised 6/26/24, showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal funds withdrawn from the resident trust account were appropriately accounted for and used exclusively for three residents (Residents #36, #48 and #26). The facility failed to ensure withdrawals for personal spending were authorized by the resident and/or the resident's legal guardian, and signed off and approved by the appropriate facility staff, in accordance with the facility's policy. The facility identified 105 residents with funds handled by the facility. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Resident Trust policy, revised 11/8/23, showed: -Purpose: Complete procedures on resident trust responsibilities; -General Information Regarding Responsibilities of Holding Resident Funds: --The facility shall keep an accurate and maintained accounting system for the residents that choose to have their personal funds managed. These funds shall be safeguarded by the facility, using complete and separate accounting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure general accounting principles were followed by failing to follow up on outstanding checks during monthly resident trust fund reconciliations. This facility identified 105 residents with funds handled by the facility. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Resident Trust policy, revised 11/8/23, showed: -Purpose: Complete procedures on resident trust responsibilities; -Resident trust bank reconciliation: --A reconciliation of the bank statement, checkbook, and resident trust funds module must be completed monthly. This will be completed by the facility's management company staff accountant responsible for the facility's financials; -The Resident Trust Clerk will review the monthly bank reconciliation for any outstanding checks listed that are over two months. If this is found, the Resident Trust Clerk will void the check listed and reissue a new check to reflect current date to be in accordance with state regulation. Review of the facility's monthly resident trust reconciliation, from April 2023 through March…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment when staff served meals on Styrofoam and used plastic utensils, provided a dirty wheelchair to one resident (Resident #102), and did not clean three resident rooms (Resident #130, room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]). The sample was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's housekeeping deep cleaning policy, dated 6/29/23, showed: -Purpose: to ensure all rooms are clean; -Policy: Deep cleaning is to be completed as scheduled. This includes complete pull-outs of furniture in rooms, wall cleaning, floor cleaning (scrubbing and waxing included), restrooms to be cleaned and disinfected, cobwebs removed, beds and rails to be cleaned, sprinkler heads to be cleaned, light covers to be clean and free of bugs, over-bed light covers to be cleaned and free of bugs, sinks cleaned, windows to be cleaned and ensure no spider webs, drapes and curtains to be cleaned (including privacy curtains), call lights to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's care plan was updated and accurate to reflect the resident's needs. This failure affected three residents, whose care plans did not identify the residents' smoking status and one resident, whose care plan did not identify medication refusals (Residents #283, #65, #64 and #18). The sample was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans and Baseline Care Plans policy, revised 1/19/22, showed: -A licensed nurse that has been designated by the facility administration will coordinate each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals among the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT); -A comprehensive care plan should be completed within 14 days of admission; -A baseline care plan should be completed within 48 hours of admission; -Information gathered to formulate care plans and assure accuracy of MDS includes but is not limited to: direct observation, communication with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately assess and investigate a series of falls resulting in head injuries, and to implement adequate interventions following the series of falls for one resident (Resident #36). The facility failed to ensure appropriate techniques and/or functional equipment were utilized during mechanical lift transfers for two residents (Residents #36 and #119), and to ensure staff applied and used gait belts properly during transfers or assisted ambulation for three residents (Residents #64, #102 and #39). In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents were routinely and accurately assessed for smoking safety for three residents (Residents #64, #18 and #107). The sample was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Focus Risk Assessment Plan Scope/Severity of Falls (FRAPSS) policy, revised 6/29/23, showed: -Purpose: To assess all residents for potential for falls in the facility. To ensure a comprehensive interdisciplinary plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with side rails were appropriately assessed for safety in accordance with the facility's policy, for four residents (Residents #125, #36, #30 and #46). The facility identified 11 residents as utilizing side rails. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Bed Siderails Policy, revised 6/29/23, showed: -All residents using any size siderail device on their beds will have a Restraint/Entrapment Assessment completed to determine the restraining, enabling, or hazard effect of the device. The Assessment will occur upon initial use, quarterly, and as needed if there is a significant change in the resident's condition; -Each resident using a siderail device will have a detailed history documented including the symptoms or reasons for using a device; -Using any device requires a care plan. Use the Device Care Planning Process information in this policy when developing the plan. 1. Review of Resident #125's medical record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for two out of three medication carts reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Medication Storage and Destruction Policy, reviewed 1/5/23, showed: -Narcotic and controlled drug storage; -A manual end of shift narcotic count must be completed with the oncoming nurse counting and the outgoing nurse verifying; -Because the narcotics may be stored in a number of different carts, different pairs of nurses may be conducting counts at the different carts; -In the event the nurse must leave prior to the end of their shift, the nurse may count with another nurse and/or supervisor before leaving the facility, and then that nurse/supervisor will conduct the end of shift narcotic count; -Any nurse leaving the facility without properly conducting the narcotic count will receive disciplinary action, up to and including termination;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food delivered to residents was palatable and at required temperatures for four residents (Residents #125, #84, #130 and #119) and additional residents who ate in their rooms on the 300 and 400 hallways. The sample was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's dietary food preparation policy, dated 7/5/23, showed: -Food temperatures: foods will be served at proper temperature to ensure food safety; -Acceptable serving temperatures are: meat should be higher than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) but preferably 160-175 degrees F, potatoes should be higher than 135 degrees F but preferably 160-175 degrees F; -Food tasting: the cook or Dietary Manager will taste food prepared before serving. 1. Review of Resident #125's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/13/24, showed: -Dependent (helper does all of the effort) on assistance with eating; -Diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen floor, walk in refrigerator, and appliances clean, and failed to ensure the ice machine had an air gap. The sample was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's daily and weekly cleaning schedule, undated, showed: -The floors are to be swept and mopped daily; -The food storage bins are to be cleaned weekly; -The storage racks are to be cleaned weekly; -The kitchen appliances are to be cleaned daily/weekly. 1. Observation on 4/14/24 at 8:16 A.M., showed the following: -The bulk storage room had water pooling on the ground, various trash and food debris littered the floor and beneath the area of the storage rack, and all three bulk bins had dirty lids with a powder substance; -The walk in refrigerator had caked on grime and food debris on the floor and shelves in various areas, and wrapper trash under the storage rack; -The floor in the main part of the kitchen and pots room had food debris and various dried liquid stains. 2. Observation on 4/16/24 at 10:52 A.M., showed the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when they did not obtain Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC, a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) line orders and nephrostomy tube (a tube that is directly inserted into the kidney to drain urine) orders on admission, failed to ensure that suprapubic catheter (a tube that is inserted in the lower abdomen to drain urine) care orders were in place on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), and failed to ensure a yearly electrocardiogram (EKG, a test to diagnosis heart irregularities) was completed for one resident (Resident #64). The sample size was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Intravenous (IV) Catheter Care and Maintenance and Access Procedures policy, revised on 6/29/23, showed: -PICCs: -Frequency of dressing change: -Change the dressing 24 hours after insertion; -Transparent dressing: Change every 5-7 days unless soiled or loose; -Gauze…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs-bathing, dressing, toileting) received necessary services to maintain adequate personal hygiene when staff left one resident soiled for an extended period (Resident #44), and when staff did not shave and provide nail care for three residents (Residents #102, #64 and #18). The sample was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's ADL and Documentation Policy, last reviewed 10/18/23, showed: -All nurses, aides and other employees must follow nursing standard of practice of completing ADLs; -For independent residents, ADLs must be documented two times per week; -For all other residents who are not independent, ADLs must be documented daily; -All documentation is completed in the electronic medical charting system. 1. Review of Resident #44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility, dated 2/23/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standard when staff failed to identify newly acquired skin issues and obtain treatment orders for two residents (Residents #64 and #44). The sample was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Skin Integrity Assessment policy, revised on 6/30/23, showed: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all residents are being assessed for skin integrity issues or concerns weekly and changes being reported to the physician, legal guardian, family, interdisciplinary care plan team and the wound nurse consultant. Procedure: -All residents will be assessed for skin integrity concerns weekly by the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC), wound nurse, or licensed designee; -Any skin integrity concerns will be reported to the RCC, DON and physician for treatment orders as needed; -All pressure ulcers or skin integrity concerns will be marked on the assessment. 1. Review of #64's annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter bags (used to collect urine) remained positioned below the bladder of two residents with indwelling urinary catheters (thin tubes inserted into the bladder to drain urine), and to ensure catheter bags and catheter tubing remained off the floor. The facility's failure caused the potential for contamination and urinary tract infection. The facility identified six residents with catheters, all of whom were sampled, and problems were identified with two (Residents #64 and #36). The sample was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Catheter Care policy, revised 6/29/23, showed: -Purpose: The facility will ensure any resident with a urinary catheter will be maintained to prevent infection; -Procedure included: -Keep the urinary drainage bag below the level of the bladder to prevent backflow of the urine; -Make sure the urinary drainage bag does not touch the floor. 1. Review of Resident #64's annual Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had appropriate physician orders for assessment/monitoring of dialysis (the clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) access sites and to failed to maintain ongoing communication with dialysis centers for residents receiving dialysis treatment. Two residents were sampled for dialysis and problems were found for one resident (Resident #3). The sample was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Dialysis policy, revised 3/18/22, showed: -Purpose: Ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services as ordered by physician. The facility will ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards for practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. The facility will ensure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis and/or peritoneal dialysis consistent with professional standards of practice including the: -Ongoing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards when providing peri-care (cleansing of the genitals and anal area) for one resident (Resident #102) and when providing treatment for a supra-pubic catheter (a tube to drain urine that is inserted in the lower abdomen) for one resident (Resident #64) The sample size was 26. The census was 133. Review of the facility's Using Gloves policy, revised 6/29/23, showed: -When gloves are indicated, disposable single-use gloves should be worn; -When to use gloves: -When touching excretions, secretions, blood, body fluids, mucous membranes, or non-intact skin; -Gloves need to be used during removal of wound dressings; -Gloves are changed and hands are washed, new gloves donned before a clean dressing is applied; -When the employee's hands have any cuts, scrapes, wound, chapped skin, or dermatitis; -When cleaning up spills or splashes of blood or body fluids; -When cleaning potentially contaminated items;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all call lights in the facility were in working order, including a visual notification above the door and audible notification at the nurse's station. Concerns were noted in one of 17 resident rooms surveyed, affecting one of 26 sampled residents (Resident #65). The census was 133. Review of Resident #65's medical record, showed diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body), pseudobulbar affect (episodes of sudden or uncontrolled emotion), multiple sclerosis (MS, a chronic disease of the central nervous system causing pain and loss of fine motor function) and hypertension. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally-mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/11/24, showed: -No cognitive impairment; -Required moderate assistance from staff with dressing and bathing tasks; -Wheelchair for locomotion. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) received his/her PRN (administered as necessary) Oxycodone (opioid narcotic used to treat moderate to severe pain) timely. The medication was available in the facility Statsafe (an emergency drug dispensing system containing multiple commonly used medications that requires a code to access), but the nurse on duty did not have the code to access the system to obtain and administer the medication when the resident requested it. Four residents were sampled and problems were found with one. This had the potential to effect any resident with an order for a medication located in the Statsafe system. The census was 128. Review of the resident's admission face sheet, showed: -admission date of 8/25/23; -Diagnoses of malignant (tendency to become progressively worse, metastasize (to spread)) esophageal (esophagus: connects the throat to the stomach) cancer and anemia (a deficiency in the oxygen-carrying component of the blood). Review of the resident's pain evaluation, dated 8/25/23 at 7:07 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed implement written policies and procedures regarding the residents' right to formulate an advance directive when staff failed to follow policies and procedures regarding accurate documenting of residents code status, for 13 of 27 sampled residents (Residents #120, #29, #76, #66, #9, #69, #65, #534, #63, #484, #81, #16, and #103). The census was 135. Review of the facility's Code Status/emergency Procedures/Medical Emergencies policy, revised on [DATE], showed: -Purpose: To outline procedures to be followed during a medical emergency, to establish guidelines for the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and notification of emergency medical services (EMS), attending physician, administrator, Director of Nursing (DON) and legal guardian/family; -The code status documentation will be uploaded to the resident's electronic record and appropriately signed; -If do not resuscitate (DNR, no life saving measures performed) the Out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide alternate meals to residents. The facility did not have a documented alternate meal plan for six out of 27 sampled residents (Residents #16, #55, #65, #91, #74, and #103). The facility census was 135. 1. Review of the facility's resident council minutes, dated 6/23/22, showed: -Dietary: They have gotten worse. Can they have a choice between a sandwich or salad for substitutes; -Department heads in attendance included Food Services Director. During a resident council interview on 8/23/22 at 10:30 A.M., seven of seven residents in attendance who represent the resident population said if they do not like what is served during a meal, they are given a sandwich. 2. Review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, showed: -Diagnoses of diabetes, high blood pressure, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing); -Moderately impaired cognition; -Assistance may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions when staff donned gloves without washing hands, prepared food underneath dust coated ceiling lights and peeling paint, failed to label and date food when it was removed from the original container, failed to date health shakes to ensure they were not used beyond 14 days of the thaw date, failed to air-dry dishes and failed to ensure there was an air gap for the ice machine to prevent back flow. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility's kitchen. The census was 135. Review of the facility Dietary - Sanitary Procedures policy, dated 1/29/2018, revised on 10/12/2021, showed: -Hand Washing and Glove Use: Guidelines for hand washing and glove use to promote safe and sanitary conditions throughout department; -Hand washing is a priority for infection control; -Hands must be washed prior to beginning work, after using the restroom, after smoking, when working with different food substances i.e. raw chicken to fresh fruit,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-26 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) meetings consisted of the required committee members when the medical director failed to attend the facility's QAPI meetings. The census was 135. Review of the facility's QAPI plan policy, undated, showed: -Purpose of your organization's QAPI plan: -To provide quality excellence in resident care and do a route cause analysis for identified areas of concern and improvement; -Our facility written QAPI plan provides guidance for our overall quality improvement program. Quality assurance performance improvement principles will drive decision making within our organization. Decisions will be made to promote excellence in quality of care, quality of life, resident choice, person directed care, and resident transitions; -Our QAPI framework: -All department managers, the administrator, the director of nursing (DON), antibiotic steward, the infection prevention officer, medical director, consulting pharmacist, resident and/or family representative (if appropriate), and three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life when staff yelled at a resident during an interaction (Resident #107), laughed at a resident causing the resident to be angry (Resident #81), propelled the resident backwards and left the pants down exposing the resident's brief (Resident #3), assisted a resident to eat while standing, and did not keep the residents' clothes clean and free of food particles or stains (Resident #56). Other residents were observed in the dining area being assisted in eating by staff while standing. The sample was 27. The census was 135. Review of the facility's Nursing Home Residents' Rights, provided to residents upon admission, showed: -Residents of nursing homes have rights that are guaranteed by the federal nursing home reform law. The law requires nursing homes to promote and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain written authorization to hold personal funds from residents and/or their legal guardian, for 51 out of 82 residents for whom the facility holds funds. The facility failed to ensure residents had access to their trust account during regular business hours and on the weekends (Residents #91 and #55). These deficient practices affected all residents who had a resident trust account. The census was 135. Review of the facility's Resident Trust policy, revised 9/17/21, showed: -admission requirements regarding resident trust: Upon admission, an Authorization to Hold Resident's Funds form must be presented to the resident, guardian, or legal representative and must be signed by them if they choose to have the facility manage the Resident funds; -General Information Regarding Responsibilities of Holding Funds: -The facility shall allow the residents access to their personal possessions and funds during regular business hours, Monday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure general accounting principles by failing to complete monthly account reconciliations in a timely manner. In addition, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to residents and their representatives (Residents #91, #55, #57, and #102). This affected 82 residents whose funds were handled by the facility. The census was 135. Review of the facility's Resident Trust policy, revised 9/17/21, showed: -Purpose: Complete procedures on resident trust responsibilities; -Resident Trust Bank Reconciliation: -A reconciliation of the bank statement, checkbook, and trust funds module must be completed monthly. This will be completed by the facility's management company staff accountant responsible for the facility's financials. The reconciliation must be done by someone other than the Resident Trust Clerk; -On the first day of every month the Resident Trust Clerk must prepare a list of checks that were written from the resident trust account during the prior month. The list should be sent to the facility's management…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide laundry services to ensure residents had the linen to meet their needs. In addition, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment when they served meals on Styrofoam dishes and provided plastic utensils. This affected eight resident (Residents #28, #29, #91, #74, #65, #55, #57, and #103). The sample was 27. The census was 135. 1. During the Resident Counsel interview on 8/23/22 at 10:30 A.M., seven residents who represent the resident population said the facility has run out of towels, sheets, and blankets. 2. Review of Resident #28's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/23/22, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Supervision and set up help required for dressing and personal hygiene; -Occasionally incontinent of bladder; -Diagnoses include arthritis, depression and seizure disorders. Observation on 8/22/22 at 8:50 A.M., showed the resident in his/her room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue written transfer notices to residents and/or their representative upon transfer to a hospital when return to the facility was anticipated, for four of four residents investigated for hospital transfers (Residents #9, #63, #76 and #124) investigated for discharge notices. The census was 135. Review of the facility's resident transfer/discharge, immediate discharge, and therapeutic leave policy, revised 7/12/22, showed: -I. Reasons for discharge or transfer: C. Discharge after emergent transfers to acute care - residents who are sent emergently to the hospital are considered facility-initiated transfers because the residents return is generally expected; -II. Notice of discharge or transfer: A. Before any resident is transferred or discharged under a facility-initiated transfer or discharge, the facility must: 1. Notify the resident and the resident representative the reason for the transfer or discharge in writing in a manner they understand; -B.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written bed hold notice to residents and/or their representative upon transfer to a hospital when return to the facility was anticipated, for four of four residents investigated for hospital transfers (Residents #9, #63, #76 and #124) investigated for discharge notices. The census was 135. Review of the facility's Bed Hold policy, revised 12/10/21, showed: -When a resident is discharged to the hospital or goes on therapeutic leave, the facility will provide to the resident or their legal representative, a copy of the bed hold policy; -The policy failed to direct staff to provide the resident with a bed hold notice upon transfer to a hospital. 1. Review of Resident #9 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/7/22, showed: -admission date 7/26/21; -Cognitively intact; -Diagnosis included hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM, metabolic disease), anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for eight residents (Residents #50, #14, #130, #86, #28, #52, #55 and #83). The sample was 27. The census was 135. Review of the facility's Bed rails policy, dated 2/26/21, showed: -Purpose: To ensure all bed side rails in use have been evaluated for safety; -All residents using any size side rail device on their beds will have a restraint/entrapment assessment completed to determine the restraining, enabling, or hazard effect of the device. This assessment will occur upon initial use, quarterly and as needed if there is a significant change in the resident's condition; -Using any device requires a care plan. 1. Review of Resident #50's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 6/7/22, showed physical restraints used in bed: Bed rails used daily. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to address residents' specific needs which included feeding assistance, behaviors, gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for supplemental feeding) feedings and the use of bedrails, for four of 27 sampled residents. (Residents #2, #81, #113 and #52). The census was 135. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy, dated 1/19/22, showed: -The purpose of this policy is ensure that the facility must develops a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment; -The comprehensive care plan (CPS) must be completed within 14 days of admission; -Facility will use the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual 3.0 as a reference to help the interdisciplinary team…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, staff failed to ensure services being provided meet professional standards of quality care for four residents, when staff failed to document medications and weights as ordered, and failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen and diets (Residents #335, #124, #534, and #2). In addition, staff failed to document a resident's discharge for one of one resident investigated for discharge (Resident #500) who was discharged without a discharge progress note. The sample of residents was 27. The census was 135. Review of the facility's Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders policy, revised 7/9/21, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to outline procedures in accurately transcribing physician's orders and to ensure that all physicians' orders are followed. That a process is in place to monitor nurses in accurately transcribing and following physician's orders; -Upon receiving a physician's order via telephone, fax, written order, verbal order,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide diets and supplements as ordered to ensure residents maintained acceptable nutritional status for six residents with recent or a history of weight loss (Residents #65, #56, #132, #52, #48, and #2). The sample was 27. The census 135. Review of the facility's Weight Loss policy, revised 2/26/21, showed: -Purpose: To ensure all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight and protein level, unless the resident's condition demonstrates that this is not possible; -Procedure: -5% weight loss in 30 days will involve doctor notification and possible orders for dietary supplement, the dietician may be notified; -7.5% weight loss in 3 months will involve doctor notification, dietician to consult and any orders to increase dietary intake, supplements, etc; -10% weight loss in 6 months requires doctor notification, dietician to consult, and any orders to increase dietary intake, supplements to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document the attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side rail. The facility failed to complete an assessment of side rails to ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance including risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, and failed to ensure the bed's dimensions were appropriate for the resident's size and weight, for seven of 10 residents investigated for side rail use, resulting in the bed rails of two residents being lose and ill fitting (Resident's #82, #124, #130, #86, #52, #55, and #83). The census was 135. Review of the facility's Bed rails policy, dated 2/26/21, showed: -Purpose: To ensure all bed side rails in use have been evaluated for safety; -All residents using any size side rail device on their beds will have a restraint/entrapment assessment completed to determine the restraining, enabling, or hazard effect of the device. This assessment will occur upon initial use, quarterly and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0729 — pattern
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, before allowing an individual to serve as a nurse aide, the facility failed to ensure the individual has met competency evaluation requirements unless the individual is in a training and competency evaluation program approved by the State, when the facility assigned three of three Nursing Assistants (NAs) employed by the facility to work on the floor in the capacity of a certified nursing assistant (CNA) when no current approved nursing instructors were in the building and when no current CNA training courses were in progress. The census was 135. Review of the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services safety, CNA registry, CNA agency website, showed -In order to be approved to be a CNA Training Agency, the facility must meet these requirements: -Have approved instructors and clinical supervisors. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, updated March 2022, showed: -Facility resources needed to provide competent support and care for our resident population every day and during emergencies; -Identify the type of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 30 opportunities for error, 3 errors occurred resulting in a 10% medication error rate (Residents #61 and #18). The census was 134. Review of the facility's Medication and Administration Policy, updated 9/17/21, showed the following: -Purpose: To ensure a process is in place for proper administration of medications, techniques of administering medications, effective monitoring of residents for adverse consequences associated with side effects to medications. To provide guidelines and systems for following procedures for medication errors including defining a medication error and levels of medication errors. To ensure therapeutic guidelines are monitored in drugs that require laboratory and diagnostic studies; -Procedure: Medications are to be given per physician's orders. All medications are recorded on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and signed after the resident has taken the medication. 1. Review of Resident #61's physician order sheet (POS),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure medical records were accurately documented in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice when staff documented nutritional supplements administered for two residents (Residents #56 and #65), antibiotics administered for one resident (Resident #82), and a phosphorous binder administered for one resident (Resident #74), when the supplements and medications were unavailable. The census was 135. Review of the facility's Medication Administration and Monitoring Policy, revised 9/17/21, showed: -Purpose: To ensure a process is in place for proper administration of medications, techniques of administering medications, effective monitoring of residents for adverse consequences associated with side effects to medications. To provide guidelines and systems following procedures for medication errors including defining a medication error and the levels of medication errors. To ensure therapeutic guidelines are monitored in drugs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review, the facility failed to treat the resident with dignity and respect, allow the resident to retain and use personal property, and to protect property from loss or theft for one resident (Resident #120) when staff confiscated their personal cell phone and then lost the phone. The sample was 27. The census was 135. Review of facility admission packet, showed: -Residents shall be permitted to retain and use personal clothing and possessions as space permits; -Telephones appropriate to the resident's needs shall be accessible at all times; -Residents shall be encouraged and assisted, throughout his/her stay to exercise his/her rights as a resident and as a citizen; -Facility shall maintain a record of any personal items accompanying the resident up admission to the facility; -Residents shall not have their personal lives regulated or controlled beyond reasonable adherence to meal schedules and other written policies which may be necessary for the orderly management of the facility and personal safety of the residents. Review of Resident #120's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy during personal care for one resident who received care in view of a roommate (Resident #83). In addition, ,the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality, to include medical treatment and personal care for two of 27 resident (Residents #29 and #534) when a privacy curtain was not available. The census was 135. 1. Review of the facility housekeeping process showed: -Each housekeeper is to perform a morning walk-through; -Check trash in all resident rooms and bathrooms; -Check all supplies, restock when low or empty; -Spot check floors-clean any spills or trouble areas and pick up any trash; -Identify any odors and attend to them immediately; -Check curtains for damages, and/or stains. 2. Review of the facility deep cleaning policy showed: -Deep cleaning is to be completed as scheduled. This includes complete pull-outs of furniture in rooms, wall cleaning, floor cleaning,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the grievance policy, which required the facility to complete an investigation within 7-14 days and to respond to the individual making the grievance within 30 days. This affected one resident whose family member reported missing personal belongings to the facility (Resident #85). The census was 135. Review of the facility Grievance Policy, dated 6/1/17 and revised on 9/17/21, showed: -Purpose: To set forth the Resident's Right to file a grievance and the process to be followed. -Resident Right to File a Grievance; -The Facility wants to hear and address any concern of a resident. A resident or their legal representative can bring concerns to a staff member, the resident concern group, or call the compliance hotline. Additionally each Resident has the right to use the formal grievance process. The formal grievance process is outlined in this policy; -Every resident has the right to voice their grievance with the Facility or other agency.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. This affected two of two sampled newly admitted residents (Residents #484 and #534). The census was 135. Review of the facility's Comprehensive and Baseline Care Plans policy, revised on 1/19/22, showed: -Section II, #2: All baseline care plan must be completed within 48 hours of admission; -Section II, #3: The Baseline Care Plan must consist of the following: resident information, allergies, alarms, bowel and bladder needs, cognition, communication, diet and dining needs, discharge planning, hearing needs, mood and behavior, resident risks, medications, safety, weight monitoring needs, code status, physician orders, equipment needs, restorative needs, functional goals, skin condition, social service needs, therapy needs, and vision information and needs. 1. Review of Resident #484's electronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive care plan, with the interdisciplinary team and the resident, no later than 21 days after admission, for one of two sampled residents admitted within the past 30 days (Resident #534). The census was 135. Review of Resident #534's electronic medical record on 8/22/22 at 6:18 P.M., showed: -admission date of 8/4/22; -No baseline care plan; -No care plan developed; -Diagnosis listed under medical diagnosis tab: congestive heart failure (CHF, impaired heart function), atrial fibrillation (a-fib, irregular heart rhythm) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease). Review of the resident's electronic care plan on 8/25/22 at 7:11 A.M., showed: -Problem: 1. On 8/18/2022, patient tested positive for COVID-19, date initiated 8/18/22, revised on 8/24/22, created date 8/24/22; -Problem: Oxygen continuous at 2 liters for COPD, date initiated 8/5/22, created date 8/24/22; -Problem: Decreased Cardiac Output Heart Failure, date initiated 8/5/2022, revision on 8/24/2022, created date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate activities of daily living (ADLs) services for two of two sampled residents who required assistance with meals. (Residents #124 and #81). The census was 135. 1. Review of Resident #124's utilization review progress note, dated 5/22/22 at 12:11 P.M, showed: -The resident received physical therapy (PT)/occupational therapy (OT) four times per week; -The resident required set up assistance with eating; -Functional activities performed by therapy included transfers, safety and feeding; -He/she was not safe with ADLs. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/26/22, showed: -Cognitive status not assessed; -Rejection of care not exhibited; -Functional limitations in range of motion: No impairment of upper extremity or lower extremities; -Independent with eating; -Diagnoses included stroke, high blood pressure, acute kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of one resident observed during a Hoyer (mechanical lift) transfer and one resident observed to be propelled in a wheelchair with his/her feet dragging (Residents #134 and #3). The census was 135. 1. Review of the facility's Resident Transfer with a Mechanical Lift policy, dated 4/20/21, showed: -Purpose: To ensure safe transfer of residents with the use of a mechanical lift; -Using the controls of the mechanical lift, lift the resident until their buttocks is clear from the bed, makes sure that the resident is aligned in the sling and is securely suspended in a sitting position with legs dangling over the bottom of the sling; -One staff should guide the resident's legs over the edge of the bed; -Move the lift away from the bed, turn the resident so that they face the lift device. The other staff is to guide the resident's body toward the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for one resident (Resident #74) who missed one human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) medication, had duplicate orders for a different HIV medication, and missed a phosphorous binder medication, due to the lack of follow-up by facility staff. The census was 135. Review of the facility's Medication Administration and Monitoring Policy, revised 9/17/21, showed: -Purpose: To ensure a process is in place for proper administration of medications, techniques of administering medications, effective monitoring of residents for adverse consequences associated with side effects to medications. To provide guidelines and systems following procedures for medication errors including defining a medication error and the levels of medication errors. To ensure therapeutic guidelines are monitored in drugs that requires laboratory and diagnostic studies; -Procedure: -Medications are to be given per doctor's orders. All medications are recorded on the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-08-26 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents, the results of the most recent survey of the facility in a location where they would not be required to ask for staff assistance. The census was 135. Review of the facility's Nursing Home Residents' Rights, provided to residents upon admission, showed: -Residents of nursing homes have rights that are guaranteed by the federal nursing home reform law. The law requires nursing homes to promote and protect the rights of each resident and stresses individual dignity and self-determination; -Residents have the right to be fully informed of state survey reports and the nursing facility's plan of correction. Observation on 8/24/22 at 8:22 A.M., showed no survey binder available on resident halls. Observation of the front lobby, showed Receptionist Q at a desk. The desk area U shaped with a tall glass partition that separated the receptionist from visitors. A sign behind the front desk, survey book is located here.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$37,388 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $37,388 — penalty dated 2024-04-18
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-30 for 44 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bridgewood Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Brookfield Health Care CenterBrookfield, MO 1 of 5Brunswick Health Care CenterBrunswick, MO 1 of 5Carrie Elligson Gietner Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Cassville Health Care CenterCassville, MO 1 of 5Chariton Park Health Care CenterSalisbury, MO 1 of 5Crestwood Health Care CenterFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Eastview Manor Care CenterTrenton, MO 1 of 5Edgewood Manor Health Care CenterRaytown, MO 1 of 5Fair View Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Four Seasons Living CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Grand Manor Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Gregory Ridge Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Heritage Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Hidden Lake Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Holton Health Care CenterHolton, KS 1 of 5Legendary Health Care CenterMarshall, MO 1 of 5Milan Health Care CenterMilan, MO 1 of 5Nathan Richard Health Care CenterNevada, MO 1 of 5Nick's Health Care CenterPlattsburg, MO 1 of 5North Village ParkMoberly, MO 1 of 5Odessa Health Care CenterOdessa, MO 1 of 5Parkway Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 1 of 5Rest Haven Health Care CenterSedalia, MO 1 of 5Sarcoxie Health Care CenterSarcoxie, MO 1 of 5South County Health Care CenterArnold, MO 1 of 5Wellsville Health Care CenterWellsville, MO 1 of 5Westview Nursing HomeCenter, MO 2 of 5St Elizabeth Care CenterSaint Elizabeth, MO 2 of 5Stonecrest HealthcareViburnum, MO 3 of 5Greenville Health Care CenterGreenville, MO 3 of 5Portageville Health Care CenterPortageville, MONot rated (Special Focus)Hillside Health Care CenterSaint Louis, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
JOHNSON, LAJUANAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/03/2006
DESTEFANE, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/1991
RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/1991

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 95%Medicare 2%Other / private 3%

About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$222per resident / day
operating cost
$6,737per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$225per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265500. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next