Rest Haven Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 31.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 60.6 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.72 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.87 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free from sexual abuse, when staff found Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) A in the resident's bed with his/her pants around his/her ankles, resident's pants and underwear off. CNA A admitted he/she sexually assaulted the resident. The facility census was 62.The administrator was notified on 01/06/26 of a past non-compliance immediate jeopardy (IJ) which occurred on 01/04/26. The administrator immediately began an investigation and began in-servicing all staff on abuse and neglect who were on duty and continued in-servicing staff not on duty prior to their shifts. The IJ was corrected on 01/04/26. 1. Review of facility's abuse and neglect policy, revised 06/2024, showed the definition of abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free from accidents, when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A heated water in a microwave and gave it to the resident, the resident spilled the hot water on him/herself, which resulted in a burn injury to the resident's legs. Facility staff failed to prevent one resident (Resident #2) from falling, when staff assisted the resident with one staff member and rolled the resident to his/her side during care and the resident fell from his/her bed. The facility's census was 53.The administrator was notified on 05/12/26 of past Non-Compliance which occurred on 05/08/26. On 4/17/26, the nursing staff were in-serviced on the facility's Fall Prevention and Safe Resident Handling policies, and on 05/07/26 to 05/08/26, staff were in-serviced on abuse and neglect, how to heat foods/liquids for residents and safe temperatures to serve hot liquids to residents. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of care, when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A administered treatment to one resident's (Resident #1's) burn injury, without obtaining an order from the physician. The facility's census was 53.The administrator was notified on 05/12/26 of past Non-Compliance which occurred on 05/08/26. On 05/07/26, staff were in-serviced on when to notify management of incidents, and to always obtain an order from the physician for treatments, and on 05/08/26, LPN A was in-serviced and counseled on when to obtain orders from the physician for a treatment. 1. Review of the facility's Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders policy, dated 05/18/24, showed the purpose is to ensure that all physician's orders are followed. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, dated 03/17/26, showed staff assessed the resident as cognitively intact, and without impairments to hands/arms or legs. Review of the resident's progress note, dated 05/07/26 at 5:49…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent potential contamination and outdated use. Facility staff failed to ensure the dish washing machine operated according to manufacturer's instructions to adequately prevent cross contamination of kitchen wares. Facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary, using approved techniques, to prevent cross-contamination. The census was 64.1. Review of the facility's Resident Food: Storage and Sharing policy, revised 09/16/2024, showed the purpose of the policy is to ensure resident food storage is safe with sanitary storage, handling and consumption. Review showed food items will be dated after opening and prepared food that is dated three days after it is placed in the refrigerator will be discarded.Review of the kitchen policies provided by the facility showed they did not contain a kitchen specific food labeling and storage policy. Observation on 12/30/25 at 12:00 P.M., showed the dry goods storage area contained a service cart with six plastic containers of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants when facility staff failed change and/or store oxygen and nebulizer tubing in a manner to prevent the spread of bacteria for three residents (Resident #1, #18, and #35) out of three sampled residents. Facility staff failed to maintain proper infection control practices for three residents (Resident # 13, #18 and #25) out of four sampled residents catheters.Facility staff failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene, and glove changes during wound care for one resident (Resident #2) out of two sampled residents. Staff failed to implement the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy when they did not educate, or alert staff of residents who required EBP, and failed to place appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in close proximity for four (Resident #1, #2,#25, #40) of six sampled residents. Facility staff failed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) as the Infection Preventionist (IP) for the facility's infection prevention and control program. The census was 52. 1. Review of the facility's Infection Preventionist Policy, revised 03/05/2025, showed the facility will employ one or more qualified individuals with responsibility for implementing the facility's infection prevention and control program. 2. During an interview on 03/05/25 at 2:43 P.M., the Chief Nursing Director said they do not currently have an infection preventionist (IP). He/She said the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) is working on getting certified. During an interview on 03/06/25 at 7:10 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said they do not currently have an IP. He/She said he/she is not sure who is monitoring, tracking, educating facility staff members on infection control. He/She just recently became the DON. He/She said he/she usually works the floor as the charge nurse. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide a comfortable, safe, and homelike environment for residents, when staff failed to maintain walls, floors, bathrooms, and the building structure of resident occupied rooms and common areas. The facility census was 52. 1. Review of the facility's Safe and Homelike Environment policy, dated 06/0524 showed: - In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. This includes ensuring the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk; - The facility will create and maintain, to the extent possible, a homelike environment that demphasizes the institutional character of the setting; - Housekeeping and maintenance services will provide as necessary to maintain a sanitary and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for eight residents (Resident #1, #2, #9, #12, #18, #25, #45 and #258) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility's census was 52. 1. Review of the Facility's Comprehensive Care Plans policy, dated 10/31/24, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan or each resident, consistent with resident rights, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment; -Resident specific interventions that reflect the reisdent's needs and preferences. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff used to assess the care needs of the resident, dated 1/31/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide services to meet professional standards when staff failed to document and obtain orders for hospice services on two (Resident #18 and #45) of three residents who receive hospice services, to obtain orders for an indwelling catheter for three(Resident #12, #13, and #18) out of three sampled residents, failed to document weekly skin assessments for three (Resident #9, #12, and #13) of six sampled residents and failed to document a smoking assessment on one (Resident #9) of five residents who smoked. The facility census was 52. 1. Review of the Coordination of Hospice Services policy, dated 05/18/24, showed the policy did not contain direction to obtain a physician order for hospice. Review of the facility's Indwelling and Suprapubic Catheter Use and Removal policy, dated 06/26/24, showed: -If an indwelling catheter is in use, the facility will provide appropriate care for the catheter in accordance with current professional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide care to meet basic hygiene needs for five sampled residents (Resident #11, #12, #13, #27, and #42,). The facility census was 52. 1. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) policy, dated 05/18/24, showed: -The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADL's do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable; -Care and services will be provided for the following ADL's, toileting, bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. Review of the facility's Resident Showers policy, dated 06/26/24, showed: -It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per standards of practice; -Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols and based upon resident safety; -Partial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to lock medication carts when unattended and failed to safely store hazardous materials in a manner to prevent accidents in two of three shower rooms. The facility census was 52. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 05/18/24, showed: -All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperature controls; -During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart. 2. Observation on 03/03/25 at 11:28 A.M., showed the medication cart at the nurse station unlocked and unattended. Observation showed residents in the hall near the nurses station. Observation on 03/05/25 at 8:36 A.M., showed the Director of Nursing (DON) left the medication cart unlocked and unattended at the nurses' station. Observation on 03/05/25 11:50 A.M., showed the medication cart at the nurse station unlocked and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services by sufficient numbers of nurse aides to provide nursing care to eight of 14 sampled residents (Resident #11, #12, #13, #25, #27, #31, #33, and #42) to ensure care and comfort of residents daily needs. The facility census was 52. 1. Review of the resident council meeting notes for December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025, showed the residents expressed concern for lack of staff, staff not answering call lights at night, staff not making the beds, night shift working with only one nurse for the entire building, not receiving ice water every shift and not enough aides to work on the 100 hall. Review of the facility's nurse staff punch detail dated 02/17/25 through 03/05/25 showed: -One licensed nurse and one certified nurse aide (CNA) on duty from 10:49 P.M. to 5:43 A.M. on 02/23/25 with a census of 57 residents; -One licensed nurse and one CNA on duty from 09:33 P.M. to 11:46 P.M., on 02/24/25 with a census of 57…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$39,230 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,380 — penalty dated 2026-05-12
• $24,850 — penalty dated 2026-01-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $54K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO