Sarcoxie Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 37.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.49 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.64 on weekdays — 32% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 84% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-03-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent weight loss and failed to notify the physician of weight loss for one resident (Resident #15) in a selected sample of 13 residents. The facility's census was 33. Review of the facility's weight monitoring policy, revised 05/07/24, showed the following information: -Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise. -Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) or insidious weight loss (gradual unintended loss over a period of time) may indicate a nutritional problem. -The facility will utilize a systemic approach to optimize a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-03-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management to all residents when staff failed to implement an effective routine pain management program, failed to accurately assess pain and medication effectiveness according to standards of practice, and failed to identify, develop, and implement interventions related to pain management for for one resident (Resident #26) who expressed severe and constant pain in his/her hands and arms in a selected sample of 13 residents. The facility had a census of 33 residents. Review of the facility's pain management policy, revised 06/26/24, showed the following information: -The facility will utilize a systemic approach for recognition, assessment, treatment and monitoring of pain. -Recognize when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when the pain can be anticipated. -Evaluate the resident for pain and the cause(s) upon admission, during ongoing scheduled assessments and when a significant change in condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with an approved call light system when the facility failed to have process in place to notify staff of sounding call lights when call lights notifications could not be heard on the hall and the facility did not provide staff with pagers for notification of call lights. The facility census was 33. Review of the facility Call light Accessibility and Timely Response Policy, revised [DATE], showed the following:-The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response;-All staff will be educated on the proper use of the resident call system, including how the system works and ensuring resident access to the call light;-Staff will report problems with a call light or the call system…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse and neglect prevention policies, when the facility failed to complete a criminal background check (CBC), an employee disqualification list (EDL - a list of individual prohibited from working in a long-term care facility in Missouri due to a finding of abuse or neglect) check, a Nurse Aide (NA) Registry (list of individual with a Federal Indicator (a marker given to a potential employee who has committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents) prohibiting them from working in a certified facility) check, and the Nurse License Verification Report (provides official, board-of-nursing-approved details on a nurse's license) check for four sampled staff (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, LPN B, LPN C, and LPN D). The facility census was 39. Review of the facility policy titled Background Investigations, dated 12/27/24, showed the following:-Job reference checks, drug screenings, licensure verifications, and criminal conviction record checks are conducted on all personnel making…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing staffing at all times when the facility failed to schedule for and document nurse staffing 24 hours daily resulting in nurse staff working extended shifts to provide coverage due to lack of nursing staff. The facility census was 39.Review of the facility policy titled, Sufficient Staffing, dated 05/18/24, showed the following:-The facility will supply services by sufficient numbers of each of the following personnel types on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans, except with waived, licensed nurses, and other nursing personnel, including but not limited to nurse aides;-The facility is required to provide licensed nursing staff 24 hours a day, 7 days a week;-Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are determined by the needs of residents based on each resident's plan of care.1. Review of the facility's nursing schedules and time sheets, dated 09/04/25, showed the following-The Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when the facility failed to have processes in place to ensure all new staff were screened prior to employment for tuberculosis (TB - a serious illness that mainly affects the lungs and can be spread when a person with the illness coughs, sneezes or sings) when the facility did not complete TB testing for four staff (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, LPN B, LPN C, and LPN D). The facility census was 39.Review of the facility policy titled, Tuberculosis Testing, revised 06/29/23, showed the following:-Upon hire, a new employee will receive a two-step PPD (purified protein derivative - the protein solution used in the TB skin test to detect exposure to the tuberculosis bacterium).Review of 19 CSR 20-20.100 Tuberculosis Testing for Residents and Workers in Long-Term Care Facilities showed the following: -Long-term care facilities shall screen their residents and staff for tuberculosis using the Mantoux method purified protein derivative (PPD) five tuberculin unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day seven days per week. The facility census was 39.Review of the facility's Registered Nurse Policy, dated 04/30/24, showed the following information:-The facility will utilize the services of a RN for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week;-The Director of Nursing (DON) may serve as a charge nurse only when the facility has average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents.1. Review of the facility's provided nurse schedules, dated 08/07/25 through 08/26/25, showed no RN coverage on any shift for the following dates:-08/07/25;-08/08/25;-08/09/25;-08/10/25;-08/16/25;-08/17/25;-08/25/25;-08/26/25.During an interview on 08/27/25, at 1:03 P.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A said he/she was unsure if a RN was on duty every day. During an interview on 08/27/25, at 1:11P.M., Certified Medication Technician (CMT) B said the following:-He/she believed the facility had daily RN coverage;-CMT B believed a RN was at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within two hours of receiving the allegation. The facility census was 39. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 06/12/24, showed the facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or sexual assault, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-28 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to hold the required quarterly quality assessment committee (QAA) meetings when the facility failed to meet in the fourth quarter of 2024. The facility census was 33. Review of the facility's Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) policy, dated 05/14/21, showed the following: -A QAPI meeting with be held on a monthly basis; -All department heads, the Administrator, the Director of Nursing, Antibiotic Steward, the Infection Control and Prevention Officer, Medical Director, and Consulting Pharmacist will be on the QAPI committee; -Records of the actions taken at each meeting will be kept using the attached form; -Minutes should document what was reviewed, issues/problems addressed, plan of correction, the monitoring process, and the results. -At least quarterly, all disciplines should have a representative at the QAPI meetings. 1. Review of the facility's 2024 QAA minutes log showed staff did not document a QAA or QAPI meeting held in October 2024, November 2024, or December 2024. During an interview on 03/23/25, at 3:46…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services to attain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being when the facility failed to notify the physician when one resident (Resident #26) exhibited continued signs and symptoms of psychosocial distress and failed to identify, develop, and implement resident specific interventions to address the resident's psychosocial needs in a selected sample of 13 residents. The facility's census was 33. 1. Review of Resident #26's face sheet (a document that provides a quick snapshot of an individual's medical and personal information) showed the following information: -admission date of 01/24/25. -Diagnoses included quadriplegia (dysfunction or loss of motor and/or sensory function in both arms and legs), hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (a group of genetic disorders affecting the peripheral nervous system, characterized by the progressive degeneration of motor and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to act as a fiduciary and properly manage residents' funds when the facility failed to ensure resident fund balances over $100.00 (or over $50.00 if the resident received Medicaid) were placed in an interesting bearing account for four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #6) and when the facility failed to maintain a petty cash fund on hand that ensured all resident could receive requests of less than $100.00 (or less then $50.00 if the resident received Medicaid) same day for three residents (Resident #1, #4, and #5). The facility census was 35. 1. Review of the facility policy 'titled Anew Healthcare Management, dated 2019, showed the following: -The facility does not require residents to deposit their personal funds with the facility. If a resident chooses to deposit personal funds with the facility, upon written authorization of a resident, the facility shall act as a fiduciary of the resident's funds and hold, safeguard, manage, and account for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-08-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program regarding flies for five of 15 sampled residents (Resident #5, #27, #14, #16, and #6). This failure had the potential to affect all 28 residents residing in the facility. 1. Observations during the survey. dates of 08/21/23 to 08/24/23, revealed an excessive number of flies. The flies were throughout the facility including the kitchen, dining room, on residents' food, persons, and equipment. Observations were made from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. on 08/21/23; 9:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. on 08/22/23; 8:00 A M. to 3:00 P.M. on 08/23/23; and 9:30 A.M. to 2:15 P.M. on 08/24/23. During the initial observation of the kitchen on 08/21/23, at 10:30 A.M., flies were observed throughout the kitchen. The Dietary Manager (DM), in the kitchen at the time of the observation, said They drive me crazy. During observations of eight residents seated in the facility's dining room waiting for supper on 08/21/23, between…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $204K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO