Four Seasons Living Center
2800 Highway Tt, Sedalia, MO 65301 · For profit - Corporation · 239 certified beds · (660) 826-8803 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,605 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-08)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.4% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.8% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 65.1% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.7% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.7% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.2% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.0% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 30.8% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.9% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.9% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.39 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.30 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 26.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.1–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 26.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 20.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.0–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.60 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 239 beds and averages 228.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.57 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.07 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.62 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.07 to 0.05 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the doors on the Tiger Medical Unit, a secured unit, were monitored during a fire alarm test which resulted in one resident (Resident #27) eloping from the facility at approximate 3:00 P.M. In addition, staff failed to complete hourly face checks for the resident, did not check on the resident after he/she missed dinner and smoke breaks, and did not notice the resident was missing until 9:00 P.M. Facility staff further failed to properly complete a thorough head count to ensure all residents were in the facility after the fire drill when staff were made aware two residents (Resident #116 and #112) had left the facility when the unit doors were left unattended and unlocked. Facility staff failed to properly store and lock medications to ensure resident safety for six residents (Resident #163, #211, #233, #74, #86, and #39) of a sample of 45 residents. The facility census was 231.The administrator was notified on 12/5/25 at 6:06…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-06-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free of significant medication errors when Registered Nurse (RN) A did not verify admission physician's orders, which resulted in staff not administering diabetic medications and resident hospitalization with Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (a life-threatening complication of diabetes that occurs when the body lacks enough insulin to use blood sugar). The facility census was 224.The administrator was notified on 06/12/26 of Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 06/08/26. The Director of Nursing (DON) investigated, notified the residents' responsible party, counseled RN A, and in-serviced staff regarding medication administration, transcribing physician's orders, medication reconciliation, and the admission process. Staff corrected the deficient practice on 06/08/26. Review of the facility's Medication Reconciliation Policy, dated 05/14/24, showed the facility reconciles medication frequently throughout a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure three residents (Resident #5, #6, and #7) out of seven sampled residents remained free from physical abuse when Resident #8 who had a history of physical aggression towards other residents willfully hit the residents in the head. The facility's census was 234.1. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, dated 06/12/24, showed abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physician condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Physical abuse is purposefully beating, striking, wounding, or injuring any resident in any manner whatsoever. Residents who allegedly mistreat another resident will be removed from contact with the resident during the course of the investigation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide supervision of one resident (Resident #1) who has a history of inserting foreign objects into his/her colostomy bag (a bag that collects stool) and stoma (an opening in the body) which resulted in the resident being transfered to the hospital. The facility census was 232. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Incidents and Accidents Policy, dated 05/18/24, showed staff were directed to assure appropriate and immediate interventions are implemented and corrective actions are taken to prevent recurrences and improve the management of resident care. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 07/18/24, showed staff assessed the resident as cognitively intact and used a colostomy bag. Review of the resident's Physician Order Summary, undated, showed an order for a colostomy bag. Review of the resident's medical record showed staff documented: -On 06/23/24 at 1:34 P.M., the resident sent to the hospital due to shoving a paperclip in his/her stoma;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, facility staff failed to provide adequate nursing staff, as determined by their facility assessment. The facility census was 239.1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Policy and Tools policy, dated 10/31/24, showed the facility must have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required at 483.70(e)2. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 08/01/25, showed the average daily census for the last six months of occupied beds as 235. Review showed the assessment based on the resident population and their needs for care and support daily. Review showed direct care staff required to care for their facility census for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to update two resident's (Resident #1 and Resident #2) plan of care after the residents consistently pulled the fire alarm. The facility census was 235. 1. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 10/31/24, showed the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The policy showed it did not contain direction for staff regarding updating the resident's plan of care with new interventions after a new or increased behavior.2. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], a federally mandated assessment tool, showed staff assessed the resident as cognitively intact and did exhibit other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse for one resident's (Resident #4) within the required two hours to the state agency Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS). The facility census was 228. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 06/12/24, showed it is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse and are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed time frames. The facility must ensure that all the alleged violations involving abuse or sexual assault are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse to the State Survey Agency. 2. Review of Resident #4 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], a federally mandated assessment tool, showed staff assessed the resident as cognitively intact and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to document a complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment) when they did not accurately code a psychiatric/mood disorder diagnosis for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) out of four sampled residents. Facility census was 232.1. Review of the facility's MDS 3.0, Care Assessment Summary and Individualized Care Plans policy, dated 11/06/23, showed to understand the changes presented by Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the MDS 3.0 to define the intent of each section of the MDS 3.0 and to ensure that MDS 3.0 sections are completed accurately and in a timely manner by the assigned responsible parties. 2. Review of the resident's diagnosis report, dated 04/30/23, showed staff documented a diagnosis of bipolar disorder.Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], staff assessed the resident as cognitively intact. The assessment did not contain documentation that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to update one resident's (Resident #2) plan of care who experienced suicidal ideation and had a history of self-harm, and facility staff failed to update three resident's (Resident #1, Resident #3 and Resident #5) plan of care after they exhibited increased behaviors. The facility census was 232. 1. Review of the facility's policy, MDS 3.0, Care Assessment Summary and Individualized Care Plans, dated 01/06/23, showed it did not contain direction for staff regarding updating the resident's plan of care with new interventions after a new or increased behavior.2. Review of Resident #1's progress notes, dated 01/27/2026, showed staff documented the resident was an aggressor in a resident-to-resident altercation and reported the holy spirit had taken over his/her body and he/she did not need medication.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], a federally mandated assessment tool, showed staff assessed the resident as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the two-hour required timeframe for one resident (Resident #1) of one sampled resident who reported an employee physically abused him/her. The facility's census was 227.1. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, dated 06/12/24, showed physical abuse includes handling a resident with any more force than is reasonable for a resident's proper control, treatment or management. The facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or sexual assault including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency.2. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary using approved techniques to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to allow sanitized dishes to air dry to prevent the growth of foodborne pathogens. Facility staff failed to ensure two ice machines, used to supply ice to residents, drained through an air gap to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to store moist cleaning clothes in sanitizing solution between uses to prevent the growth of bacteria and cross-contamination. Facility staff also failed to maintain kitchen equipment and surfaces in two of two kitchens and one kitchenette in a clean sanitary manner to prevent cross-contamination and the growth of food-borne pathogens. These failures have the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 231. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Dietary-Sanitary Procedures, revised 11/06/23, showed: -Hand washing is a priority for infection control;-Hands must be washed prior to beginning work, when working with different food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement complete policies and procedures for the inspection, testing and maintenance of the facility's water systems to inhibit the growth of waterborne pathogens and reduce the risk of an outbreak of Legionnaire's Disease, a serious type of pneumonia (lung infection) caused by Legionella bacteria. Facility staffs' failure to develop and implement complete policies and procedures for the inspection, testing and maintenance of the facility's water systems has the potential for the failure of staff to identify and mitigate the presence of waterborne pathogens, which places all residents of the facility at risk of exposure which could lead to illness. The facility census was 231 with a capacity of 239. 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), QSO-17-30, dated 06/02/17 and revised 07/06/18, showed:-CMS expects Medicare and Medicare/Medicaid certified healthcare facilities to have water management policies and procedures to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain resident dignity, when residents were required to line up for medication administration outside of the nurse's station door, and required two residents to communicate with staff through a three-inch hole in the enclosed nurse's station glass. Additionally, residents were required to stand in line to get their meal trays and were unable to eat in the dining room due to lack of chairs. The facility census was 231. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 07/5/23, showed each resident shall be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality including privacy in treatment. Review of the facility's policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, dated 09/21/25, showed every resident has a right to be treated with dignity and respect. All staff will speak to and treat all residents with dignity and respect. The resident's former lifestyle and personal choices will be considered when providing care and services to meet the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodations for residents when they failed to provide sufficient dining room chairs in four dining rooms to ensure residents were able to sit down and eat their meals. The facility census was 231. Review of the facility's policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, dated 09/21/25, showed each resident will be provided equal access to quality care regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition or payment source. The resident's former lifestyle and personal choices will be considered when providing care and services to meet the resident's needs and preferences. 1.Observation on 12/2/25 at 11:15 A.M., showed 17 residents residing on the Tiger Medical Unit. The dining room contained two tables and three chairs. Observation on 12/3/25 at 12:47 P.M., showed the Tiger Medical Unit dining room with three tables and one chair at each table occupied. Observation showed dietary staff delivered a cart with lunch trays. Observation showed Resident #149 stood in the hallway with his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for residents, when staff failed to clean and maintain resident room and common area walls, doors, windows, floors, toilets, air conditioning (A/C) units, bathroom vents, and furniture. Facility staff failed to ensure residents had access to clean clothes and linens in a timely manner and failed to assist residents with laundry as needed. The facility census was 231 with a capacity of 239. 1.Review of the facility policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment Policy, dated 06/5/24, showed the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility will create and maintain, to the extent possible, a homelike environment that deemphasizes the institutional character of the setting. Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment. The facility will provide and maintain bed and bath linens that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital and failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer and/or discharge for eight residents (Resident #4, #7, #9, #12, #91, #93, #100, and #150) out of eight sampled to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman. The facility census was 231. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Hold, revised 06/12/2025, showed: -Before a resident is transferred or discharged , the facility must: -Notify the resident and the resident representative the reason for the transfer or discharge in writing in a manner they understand; --Notify a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term care Ombudsman; --A copy of the discharge/transfer notice shall be sent to the Ombudsman at least 30 days in advance of a discharge or as soon as possible; --In the case of an emergency or immediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the plan of care for ten residents (Resident #12, #19, #57, #58, #76, #82, #91, #117, #185, and #211) out of 45 sampled residents with changes in the resident's needs. The facility census was 231.1. Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 10/31/24, showed it is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident's rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan will describe resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences and will be prepared by an interdisciplinary team. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility staff failed to provide care, to maintain personal hygiene, grooming, bathing and nail care for four residents (Residents #211, #233, #149, and #77) out of a sample of 45 residents. The facility census was 231.Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 05/18/24, showed a resident who is unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary services, to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal hygiene. The facility will provide a maintenance and restorative program to assist the resident in achieving and maintaining the highest practicable outcome based on comprehensive assessment. The facility will maintain individual objectives of the care plan and periodic review and evaluation. 1. Review of Resident #233's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 09/5/25, showed staff assessed the resident as:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Rejection of care not exhibited;-Required moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure nine Nurse Aides (NA) (NA D, NA I, NA P, NA V, NA W, NA X, NA Y, NA Z, and NA AA) out of nineteen sampled staff, completed the nurse aide training program within four months of his/her employment in the facility. The facility census was 233.1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for NA qualifications.2. Review of NA D's CNA report showed a hire date of 04/28/25. Review showed the file did not contain documentation the NA completed a nurse aide training program.3. Review of NA I's CNA report showed a hire date of 08/26/24. Review showed the file did not contain documentation the NA completed a nurse aide training program.4. Review of NA P's CNA report showed a hire date of 07/15/25. Review showed the file did not contain documentation the NA completed a nurse aide training program.5. Review of NA V's CNA report showed a hire date of 06/16/25. Review showed the file did not contain documentation the NA completed a nurse aide training program.6. Review of NA W's CNA report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed train their staff on how to adequately care for residents behavioral health needs and two residents, with behavioral health needs, were involved in a resident to resident altercation (Resident #22 and #44) and failed to educate staff on resident specific behaviors and interventions for seven residents (Resident #170, #19, #27, #116, #129, #163, and #211) of 35 sampled residents on two units, the women's behavioral health unit and Tiger Lane. The facility census was 231. 1. Review of the facility's Behavioral Health Services Policy, revised 10/31/24, showed it is the policy of the facility to ensure all residents receive necessary behavioral health services to assist them in reaching and maintaining their highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning. Behavioral health encompasses a resident's whole emotional and mental well-being, which includes, but is not limited to, the prevention and treatment of mental and substance use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to document the administration of controlled substance medications in the facility's Control Drug Record book (used to reconcile narcotic medications) at time of administration for three residents (Resident #166, #189 and #116) out of 45 sampled residents. The facility census was 231. 1.Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability Policy, dated 05/14/24, showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, complaint with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposure;-All controlled substances obtained from a non-automated medication cart or cabinet are recorded on the designated usage form. Written documentation must be clearly legible with all applicable information provided;-The Controlled Drug Record (or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure drugs used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when unpackaged, loose medications were found in five of seven medication carts observed. The facility census was 231.1.Review of the facility's, Medication Storage Policy, dated 05/18/24, showed the policy did not provide guidance regarding loose medications in the medication carts. Observation on 12/01/2025 at 9:55 A.M., showed the 200 hall medical unit medication cart with one crushed pill and one blue and yellow capsule loose in the cart. Observation on 12/01/2025 at 10:19 A.M., showed the 100 hall medical unit medication cart with two white tablets, one pink tablet, and one white tablet in the narcotic box all loose in the cart. Observation on 12/01/2025 at 10:37 A.M., showed the woman's behavior unit medication cart with three white tablets and one yellow tablet loose in the cart. Observation on 12/01/2025 at 10:50 A.M., showed the men's behavior unit medication cart with one purple and pink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure prepared food items were served at a safe and appetizing temperature to residents who ate in the Main Street and 400 hall dining rooms. Facility staff failed to ensure the internal temperature of hot food held in the steam table measured at least 140 degrees Fahrenheit (dF) and failed to ensure the internal temperature of hot food measured at least 120 dF upon service to the residents. The facility census was 231. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Dietary Food Preparation, revised 07/05/23, showed:-Foods will be served at the proper temperature to ensure food safety;-Staff are to check the internal temperature of foods to be served with a probe-type thermometer at the beginning of the service and during service;-The acceptable serving temperature for hot food is 135 dF, but preferably 160-175 dF;-If the food temperatures do not meet acceptable serving temperatures, reheat the product to the proper temperature;-If temperatures are not at acceptable levels and cannot be corrected in time for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify one resident's (Resident #1's) responsible party after the resident had a change in condition. Facility staff failed to notify one resident's (Resident #3's) physician out of two sampled residents when staff did not administer the resident's medications. The facility census 231.1. Review of the facility's Notification of Change policy, dated 05/14/24, showed the purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and /or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Circumstances requiring Notification include accidents, resulting in injury or potential to require physician intervention.2. Review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the plan of care with changes in the resident's needs for two residents (Resident #1 and #2) out of three sampled residents. Facility staff also failed to update the plan of care with behavioral interventions for one resident (Resident #8) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 231. 1. Review of the facility's MDS 3.0, Care Assessment Summary and Individual Care Plans policy, dated 11/06/23, showed staff are directed as follows:-The Plan of Care should address improvements where possible and maintenance and prevention of avoidable declines and all Care Area Triggers;-There are twenty (20) areas that can become triggered areas for concern and must be addressed with individualized interventions on the plan of care for resident;-The policy did not address timeframes for revising a resident's care plan after a change in condition.2. Review of Resident #1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of practice when staff failed to ensure prescribed medications were available and administered for one resident (Resident #3) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census was 230.1. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 06/26/24, showed medications are administered by a licensed nurse, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. 2. Review of the facility's Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders policy, dated 05/18/24, showed staff are directed as follows:-The Licensed/Registered Nurse will check the emergency kit to verify if the medication is present in the facility to begin immediately. If the medication is not available, the facility may contact the backup pharmacy to deliver the medication sooner. If the medication is unable to be started within 24 hours of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to contact one resident's (Resident #1's) responsible party after the resident had a change in condition. The facility census 231. 1. Review of the facility's, Notification of Change policy, dated 05/14/24, showed:-The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification;-The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and /or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Circumstances requiring Notification include accidents, resulting in injury or potential to require physician intervention.2. Review of Resident #1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff used to assess the care needs of the resident, dated 06/20/25, showed staff assessed the resident as moderately cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the plan of care with changes in the resident's needs for two residents (Resident #1 and #2) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 231. 1. Review of the facility's policy, MDS 3.0, Care Assessment Summary and Individual Care Plans, dated 11/06/23, showed:-The Plan of Care should address improvements where possible and maintenance and prevention of avoidable declines and all Care Area Triggers;-There are twenty (20) areas that can become triggered areas for concern and must be addressed with individualized interventions on the plan of care for resident;-The policy did not address timeframes for revising a resident's care plan after a change in condition.2. Review of Resident #1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff used to assess the care needs of the resident, dated 06/20/25, showed staff assessed the resident as moderately cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of practice when staff failed to ensure prescribed medications were available and administered after admission from 07/18/25 to 07/21/25 to one resident (Resident #3) out of two sampled residents and failed to notify the physician to obtain further orders. The facility's census was 230.1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 06/26/24, showed medications are administered by a licensed nurse, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. 2. Review of the facility's policy titled, Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders, dated 05/18/24, showed: -The Licensed/Registered Nurse will check the emergency kit to verify if the medication is present in the facility to begin immediately. If the medication is not available, the facility may contact the backup pharmacy to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, facility staff failed to provide adequate nursing staff, as determined by their facility assessment. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 232. 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 08/01/24, showed staff are directed as follows: -Direct care staff required to care for their facility census for a twenty-four hour period should include: Six Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN); Nine Certified Medication Technician (CMT); Twelve Certified Nurse Aides (CNA); Eight Nurse Aides (NA); and One Resident Care Coordinator (RCC). -The assessment is based on the resident population and their needs for care and support; -The last quarter average number of occupied beds was 235. Review of the employee staffing schedule from 01/19/25 through 02/04/25, with an average daily census of 235, showed: -Thursday, 01/30/25; six LPN's, ten CMT's, ten CNA's, six NA's and one RCC; -Sunday, 02/02/25; six LPN's, ten CMT's, thirteen CNA's, nine NA's and zero RCC; -Monday, 02/03/25; six LPN's, ten CMT's, thirteen CNA's, nine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of practice when staff failed to complete and document wound care treatments for two resident's (Resident #2 and #3) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 232. 1. Review of the facility's Documentation of Wound Treatments policy, dated 05/18/24, showed wound treatments are documented at the time of each treatment. If treatment is not due, an indication on the status of the dressing shall be documented each shift. Additional documentation shall include, but is not limited to: Date and time of the wound management treatments; weekly progress towards healing and effectiveness of current intervention; Any treatment for pain; Modification of treatments or interventions; Notifications to physician and/or responsible party regarding wound or treatment change. 2. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 12/11/24, showed staff assessed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to allow sanitized dishes to air dry prior to stacking in storage to prevent the growth of bacteria and food contamination. Facility staff failed to maintain kitchen equipment and surfaces in two of two kitchens and one kitchenette in a clean sanitary manner to prevent cross-contamination and the growth of food-borne pathogens. The facility census was 233. 1. Review of the facility's Dietary-Equipment Operations, Infection Control, and Sanitation policy, revised on 02/02/24, showed the policy directed staff to air dry dishes by racking or putting on single trays lined with mesh after they are washed and sanitized. Observation on 10/21/24 at 10:31 A.M., showed 14 metal food service pans stacked together wet in the kitchen. Observation showed eight of the 14 wet stacked pans contained food debris inside them. Observation on 10/24/24 at 7:50 A.M., showed multiple plates stacked together wet upside down on a storage cart and 20 metal plate covers stacked together wet upside down on top of the toaster in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to prevent the commingling of 12 resident's (Resident #53, #85, #69, #102, #20, #181, #128, #98, #125, #216, #116, and #204) personal funds with the facility operating funds out of 79 sampled. The sampled resident's resided in the facility. The facility census was 233. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, revised 07/05/23, showed the facility must establish and maintain a system that assures a full and complete separate accounting of resident's personal funds, the system must preclude any commingling of resident funds with facility funds. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Trust, revised 11/08/23, showed the facility shall keep an accurate and maintained accounting system for the residents that choose to have their personal funds managed. These funds shall be safeguarded by the facility using complete and separate accounting principles, which precludes any commingling of resident funds with facility funds. Review of the facility's admission Agreement, undated, showed the facility must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to provide refunds of personal funds to the residents from the facility operating account within 30 days for three residents (Resident #587, #588, and #585) out of five sampled who were discharged from the facility. The facility census was 233. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, revised 07/05/23, showed upon the death of a resident the facility must convey within 30 days resident funds, and financial accounting of those funds to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident estate. Within five days of the discharge of a resident, the facility will provide the resident or resident designee/guardian with an up-to-date accounting of resident funds. Upon the death of a resident the facility will provide an accounting to either the Department of Social Services or the fiduciary of the resident's estate. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Trust, revised 11/08/23, showed upon a resident death the facility shall submit in writing a complete accounting of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for residents, when staff failed to maintain resident rooms, furniture in common areas, and ensure resident rooms did not contain piles of laundry. Staff failed to clean and maintain wheelchairs for three residents (Resident #137, #98, and #115) of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 233 with a capacity of 239. 1. Review of facility policy titled, Housekeeping - Deep Cleaning, dated 06/29/23, show staff were directed as follows: -Deep cleaning is to be completed as scheduled. This includes complete pull-outs of furniture in rooms, wall cleaning, floor cleaning (scrubbing and waxing included), restrooms to be cleaned and disinfected, floors at closets and doorways are to be free from wax/dirt build up; -All areas should be monitored on a daily basis and all resident living areas and non-living areas should be clean and odor free; -Daily Cleaning: dust mop or sweep floor; clean bathroom using the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide an ongoing activity program designed to meet the residents' interest, mental, and psychosocial well-being on the weekends for six residents (Resident #10, #73, #140, #141, #186, and #212) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility staff failed to post an activities calendar with accurate events for residents to view on Tiger Lane. The facility census was 233. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Activity, dated 07/19/23, showed the purpose is to ensure all residents in the facility are provided an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, their interests and their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The Life Enhancement Director coordinates section F (Preferences of Customary Routines and Activities) of the comprehensive assessment and ensures the activities are designed to promote and enhance the emotional health, self-esteem, pleasure, comfort, education, creativity,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure prepared food items were served at a safe and appetizing temperature when the facility staff failed to maintain the internal temperatures of hot food items at 120 degrees Fahrenheit (dF) or higher upon service to residents who resided on the 400 and 500 halls. The facility census was 233. 1. Review of the facility's Dietary Food Preparation policy, revised on 07/05/23, showed the policy directed staff to check the internal temperature of food items before service and the acceptable serving temperatures for hot foods were greater than 135 dF but preferably 160 dF to 170 dF. Review showed the policy directed staff to reheat food products to the proper temperature if temperatures do not meet acceptable serving temperatures. 2. Observation on 10/21/24 from 12:17 P.M. to 12:51 P.M., showed Dietary Aide (DA) EE prepared meal trays for the 400 Medical Hall. Observation showed the DA placed hot food from the steamtable on to room temperature plates, put the plates on a plastic service tray, covered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to screen four employees (Dietary Aide S, [NAME] Y, Housekeeper N, and Activity Aide K) out of ten new employees prior to employment to determine if the employees had a federal indicator with the Employee Disqualification List (EDL) and/or the Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR). The facility census was 233. 1. Review of the Facility's policy titled Pre-Employment Screening, undated, showed the Human Resources department will conduct pre-employment screens on applicants to determine whether the applicant has committed a disqualifying crime, is an excluded provider of any Federal or State healthcare programs, is eligible to work in the United States, and if applicable, is duly licensed or certified to perform the duties of the position for which they applied. Human Resources will conduct the following screens on potential employees prior to hire: -Criminal History: Using the Request for Criminal Records Check, a criminal background check (CBC) should be done through the Missouri Highway Patrol's Missouri Automated Criminal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to document they administered three residents (Residents #115, #132 and #219) of 35 sampled residents medications and treatments. The facility census was 233. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Transcription of Orders/Following Physician's Orders, dated 05/18/24, showed the nurse or Certified Medication Technician (CMT) in charge of medication administration must review all of their designated MARs and TARs prior to the end of their shift to ensure that all medications/treatments scheduled to be given on their shift were administered according to the physicians' order and that all necessary interventions were taken in the event of an omission Review of the facility's policy titled Documentation of Wound Treatments, dated 05/18/24, showed wound treatments are documented at the time of each treatment. If treatment is not due, an indication on the status of the dressing shall be documented each shift. Additional documentation shall include, but is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to document and update care plans to include the use of a colostomy bag (a bag that collects stool) for one (Resident #2) and new interventions for one resident (Resident #1) with a behavior of inserting foreign objects into his/her colostomy bag and stoma (opening in the body) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 232. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 6/26/24, showed staff were directed to: -Develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment; -The comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet the resident's needs as identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The objectives will be utilized to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to contact one resident's (Resident #1's) responsible party when the resident was transported to the hospital. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the facility's Notification of Changes policy, dated 5/14/24, showed the purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident ' s physician, and notifies the resident's representative when there is a change that requires notification. Circumstances which requires notification are significant changes in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status which may include life threatening conditions or clinical complications. 2. Review of Resident #1's Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 8/9/24, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively intact; -Surgical wound to Right Foot; -Diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, Diabetes Mellitus with other circulatory complications, encounter for orthopedic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent potential spread of COVID-19 (an acute respiratory illness in humans caused by the coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2) and other infections, staff failed to protect residents in the facility when they did not follow acceptable infection control practices for COVID-19. The facility failed to separate residents who tested positive for Covid-19 from residents who had tested negative for Covid-19 or had only been exposed to Covid-19 for residents (Resident #40, #43, #21, #22, #27 and #9) at an increased risk of contracting Covid-19 due to prolonged exposure. Staff failed to wear the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) with Covid -19 positive residents, removed PPE in appropriate areas and dispose of contaminated PPE appropriately. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete 72-hour neurological checks and fall follow up documentation for two residents (Resident #1 and #2) of four sampled residents, who had un-witnessed falls. The facility census was 233. 1. Review of the facility's Post Fall Protocol, revised 6/30/23, showed the purpose of the policy is to ensure all residents who have had a fall have accurate assessment and follow through to prevent further injury and recurrence of falls. Review showed neurological assessments include assessment of level of consciousness, movement of extremities, hand grasps, pupil size, pupil reaction, and speech. Review showed documentation of the resident fall must be completed in the risk management section and include but is not limited to documentation of the incident details, the time of the incident, the location of incident, equipment involved if any, residents activity at time of the incident. Continue neurological checks (if involved hitting head or was unwitnessed) every 15 minutes for one hour, every 30 minutes for one hour, every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Please refer to Event ID 2UWO12 Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure five residents (Resident #1, #4, #2, #3 and #5) of five sampled residents had the opportunity to make and receive phone calls in a private setting. The facility census was 234.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0586 — patternNot prohibit or in any way discourage a resident from communicating with federal, state, or local officials.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Please refer to Event ID 2UWO12 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure five residents (Residents' #1, #2, #3,#4 and #5) are able to communicate freely with the state Abuse Hotline and Emergency Services. The facility census was 234.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, facility staff failed to store and label food in a manner as to prevent spoilage and outdated use. Facility staff failed to maintain the main kitchen and three kitchenettes in a clean and sanitary manner. This failure had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 236. 1. Facility staff did not provide a policy to address food storage. Observation on 07/24/2023 at 9:58 A.M., of the main kitchen, showed the backsplash of the gas range had a build-up of black grease. Further observation showed food debris and paper products under the gas range. Observation on 07/24/2023 at 10:00 A.M., of the main kitchen, showed all five double door stainless steel refrigerators contained dried food splatter on the front of the doors. Observation on 07/24/2023 at 10:02 A.M., of the main kitchen, showed: -Two stainless steel containers on the bottom of double door fridge with green Jello, uncovered and and undated. One of the trays had a scoop and the handle down in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain resident dignity, when staff failed to cover two residents' (Resident #95 and #108) catheter drainage bags (bag that collects urine from the bladder), failed to keep the privacy curtain pulled for three residents (Resident #83, #159, and #687) when the lack of sheets/blankets left them exposed to the hallway, and failed to ensure three residents (Resident #112, #205, and #217) were dressed in clothing free from holes, stains, wrinkles, and facing the right direction. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 07/05/23, showed each resident shall be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality including privacy in treatment and in care for his/her personal needs. Review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter Care, dated 06/29/23, showed catheter bags are to be placed in privacy bags to promote dignity. 2. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure five residents (Resident #1, #4, #2, #3 and #5) of five sampled residents had the opportunity to make and receive phone calls in a private setting. The facility census was 234. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident's Rights, dated 07/05/23, showed staff were directed as follows: -Privacy must include written and telephone communications; -Resident has the right to have reasonable access to the use of a telephone where calls can be made without being overheard. Review of the facility's, Phone Times schedule, undated, showed the following call times: -9:00 A.M. to 11:30 A.M. phone can be used; -11:30 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. no phone; -1:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. phone can be used; -5:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. no phone; -7:00 P.M. to 9:30 P.M. phone can be used. 2. During an interview on 09/15/23 at 10:00 A.M., Resident #1 said staff kept his/her cell phone locked inside the nurse's station, because he/she had issues. The resident said his/her Public Administrator (PA) did not want him/her to have the phone. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff did not maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, when staff failed to ensure a comfortable sound level for residents by allowing the 400 and 500 hall entrance and exit doors to slam shut, failed to maintain one resident's (Resident #64) wheelchair, and failed to adequately clean and properly maintain residents' rooms, bed linens, furniture, bathrooms, windows and window coverings in good repair. Facility staff failed clean and maintain walls, trim and doors in community areas of the facility, used by residents. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Maintenance Work Order, dated 12/21/22, showed a work order should be submitted for any issues that an employee observes which need the attention of facility maintenance. Reviewed showed when reviewing work orders, the facility maintenance department will assign each work order a priority, emergency is a one hour response, urgent is same day as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0586 — patternNot prohibit or in any way discourage a resident from communicating with federal, state, or local officials.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure four residents (Resident #1, #4, #3 and #5) of five sampled residents had the opportunity to make anonymous phone calls to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) Abuse and Neglect hotline. The facility census was 234. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident's Rights, dated 07/05/23, showed staff were directed to the following: -Resident Rights under Social Security Act, the resident has the right to communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility; -Facility must provide reasonable access to any resident by any entity or individual that provides health, social, legal, or other services to resident; -Resident has the right to have reasonable access to the use of a telephone where calls can be made without being overheard. Review of the facility's, Phone Times schedule, undated, showed the following call times: -9:00 A.M. to 11:30 A.M. phone can be used; -11:30 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. no phone; -1:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. phone can be used; -5:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete a Significant Change of Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, for one resident (Resident #235) who admitted to hospice services. Additionally, staff failed to accurately code MDS Assessments for three residents (Residents #112, #205 and #209) in regard to Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) needs, two residents (Residents #21 and #207), who used Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep airways open while sleeping, oxygen use for one resident (Resident #116), anticoagulant use for one resident (Resident #37) and insulin use for one resident (Resident #9). The facility census was 236 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, dated [DATE], showed: -A Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the residents medical, and nursing needs when they failed to address activity preferences for four residents (Resident #51, 76, 172, and 187), facial hair preferences for one (Resident #123), splint use for one resident (Resident #156) and hospice services for one resident (Resident #159). The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Baseline Care plans, reviewed 01/19/22, showed staff were directed to do the following: -The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the facility must develops a comprehensive plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment; -Facility will use the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual 3.0 as a reference to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the plan of care for three residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) (Resident #64, #95, and #168), one resident who prefers to sleep during the day (Resident #21), and one resident (Resident #123) who used bed rails. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Baseline Care plans, reviewed 01/19/22, showed staff were directed to do the following: -Daily nursing meetings will occur Monday through Friday with a review of the resident's medical, functional and psychosocial problems. From this meeting, information will be individualized to the resident's plan of care; -The care plan with be oriented toward preventing avoidable declines in functioning or functional levels, evaluating treatment objectives and outcomes of care, respecting the resident's right to refuse treatment, using an interdisciplinary approach to care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure thirteen residents (Residents #21, #49, #51, #64, #76, #123, #126, #152, #156, #159, #164, #168, and #187), who were unable to complete their own activities of daily living (ADLs) (showering/bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene), received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed no ADL care, personal hygiene or shave/facial hair policy. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nail Care, dated 06/29/23, showed staff are directed to do the following: -Nail clipping or cutting must have an order from the nurse; -Certified Nurse Aides (CNA)s or Nurse Aides (NA)s should not cut the nails of diabetic patients or patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) a disorder that narrows blood vessels to the extremities; -Responsibility and enforcement falls to the Director of Nursing (DON). 2. Review of Resident #21's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide daily activities for all residents in the Turning Leaf Unit and failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the residents' interests for three sampled residents (Resident #49, #159, and #687) on the [NAME] Hawk Boulevard hall. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Activity, dated 07/19/23, showed staff are directed to do the following: -Ensure all residents in the facility are provided an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, their interests and their physical, mental and psychological well-being; -The Life Enhancement Director coordinates section F (Preferences of Customary Routines and Activities) of the comprehensive assessment and ensures that activities are designed to promote and enhance the emotional health, self-esteem, pleasure, comfort, education, creativity, success and independence for all residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to propel four residents (Residents #83, #24, #187, and #95) in wheelchairs in a manner to prevent accidents. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed no wheelchair safety policy. 2. Review of Resident #83's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 05/18/23, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Cognitively impaired; -Required extensive assistance from one staff member for locomotion; -Required extensive assistance from two staff members for transfers; -Had limited range of motion (ROM), joint movement, in all extremities; -Used a wheelchair. Observation on 07/25/23 at 8:35 A.M., showed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) T propelled the resident from the dining area to his/her room without the use of foot pedals. The resident's feet dragged the floor. During an interview on 7/25/23 at 8:35 A.M., CNA T said the resident can propel himself/herself, but wants…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use proper hand hygiene and provide perineal care in a manner to reduce the risk of infection for two residents (Residents #1 and #156), and failed to provide appropriate catheter care (a flexible tube placed in the bladder to drain urine) for two residents (#95 and #108). Additionally, facility staff failed to clean and store respiratory equipment in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for two residents (Residents #21 and #207). The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing, dated 06/29/23, showed staff were directed to do the following: -The use of gloves does not replace handwashing; -Hands are to be washed before and after gloving; -A waterless antiseptic solution may be used as an adjunct to routine handwashing; -Handwashing must be performed under the following conditions: -After having prolonged contact with a resident; -After handling used dressings, specimen containers, contaminated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide proper communication forms for one resident (Resident #231) who resides on the memory care unit. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the facility's Communications with Persons with Limited English Proficiency policy, dated 06/30/23, showed staff were directed as follows: -Identify resident and their language; -Obtain a qualified interpreter; -Use family and/or friends as interpreters; -Provide written translation; -Monitor language needs. Review of Resident #231 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 06/18/23, showed the staff assessed the resident as follows: -Language marked undetermined; -Able to make self-understood; -Able to understand; -Clear speech; -Adequate vision using corrective lenses; -Adequate hearing; -Marked as no if he/she should be asked activity preferences; -Required limited assistance with dressing; -Required limited assistance with personal hygiene; -Independent with bathing; -Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #198) received a meal or a snack prior to dialysis (process for removal of waste and excess water from the blood due to kidney failure) treatment. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary-Medical Nutrition Therapy Policy, dated 2023, showed staff were directed to do the following: -The Dietary Technician/Dietary Manager will check all residents records for Diagnosis of Renal Failure; -After assessing residents identified to be at nutrition risk, a nutrition therapy plan is developed to meet identified needs and placed in the patient's chart; -Did not contain direction for staff in regard to dialysis. 2. Review of Resident #198's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 07/01/23, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnosis of renal failure; -Received dialysis. Review of the resident's Physician Order Summary (POS), July 2023, showed: -Dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-08 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to post the required nurse staffing information, which included the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, daily in an area readily accessible to all residents and visitors. The facility census was 233.Review of the facility's policy titled Nurse Staffing Posting Information Policy, reviewed 06/26/24, showed the nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain: -Facility Name;-Current date;-Facility current resident census;-The total number and actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directedly responsible for resident care per shift:-Registered nurses;-Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN)/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN);-Certified nurse aides (CNAs). The facility will post the Nurses Staffing Sheet at the beginning of each shift. The information posted will be:-Presented in a clear and readable format;-In a prominent place readily accessible to residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-28 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review facility staff failed to ensure the most recent survey results were posted and readily accessible to residents, family member or representatives of residents. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 236. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed no policy in regard to posted survey results. Observation on 07/27/23 at 8:34 A.M., showed a sign on the wall at the entrance to the building that read, The results of the state survey can be viewed at the nurse's desk, The reception desk has a three ring binder with the state survey results, and The locked nurse's station has a three ring binder on the desk with the state survey results. Further observation showed the state survey results binders not accessible to residents. During an interview on 07/26/23 at 10:01 A.M., the resident council said they did not know where the state inspection book is located. During an interview on 07/27/23 at 3:18 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) P and LPN R said the state survey book is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,605 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,550 — penalty dated 2025-12-08
- $17,055 — penalty dated 2025-07-23
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT — 34 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 33 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PARKER, BRANDY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 10/14/2021 |
| DESTEFANE, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2008 |
| RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/30/1996 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265149. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.