No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Northwood Hills Care Center

800 N Arthur St, Humansville, MO 65674 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (417) 754-2208 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (417) 754-2208 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jan 2025
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
104 S Ohio St · (417) 754-2223 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19 Public Sq · (417) 276-3128 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
104 -105 S Ohio St · (417) 754-8004 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.5%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.9%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.9%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.4%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.2%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.5%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.7%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.5%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.3%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.2%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.202.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.402.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
96.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 96.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 6.7–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge96.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge82.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge82.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.631.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.29
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.34
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
43.6%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 89.3 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-18)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to document monitoring after a fall for three residents (Resident #2, #3, and #4) and failed to inform management of a fall for one resident (Resident #2) who was later found to have a fracture due to the fall. The facility census was 82.Review of the facility's policy, Incident and Reportable Event Management, revised 02/24/26, showed the following:-A fall refers to unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force (example, resident pushes another resident). An episode where a resident lost his/her balance and would have fallen, if not for another person or if he or she had not caught him/herself, is considered a fall. A fall without injury is still a fall. Unless there is evidence suggesting otherwise, when a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred;-Event management includes falls;-To…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately bill the resident's appropriate Medicare plan during their stay resulting in an overpayment and failed to reimburse the resident 30 days after discharge for the over payment for one resident (Resident #5). The facility census was 82.Review of the facility's policy, Credit Balance and Refund Policy, revised 02/06/26, showed the following:-The purpose of the policy was to provide guidance on managing credit balances efficiently and to ensure accounts with credit balances due to overpayments are refunded in a timely manner and as required by law. These refunds include, but are not limited to, monies due back to federal health care programs, insurance payers, and residents;-Credit Balances may be caused by multiple reasons including, the payer paying more than expected, the resident paying more co-insurance, copay, or deductible than was owed based on the payment received from the payer; duplicate payment of the claim by payers and or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain effective and complete an infection prevention and control program when staff failed to follow appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO - bacteria or fungi that have developed resistance to multiple classes of drugs, like antibiotics) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) for one resident (Resident #1) with an indwelling catheter (tubing placed to drain the bladder to outside the body), a nephrostomy tube (tubing placed to drain the kidney to the outside the body) and with two wounds present. The facility census was 82.Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention' (CDC) Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of MDROs, dated 04/02/24, showed the following:-MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report all allegations of potential abuse immediately to facility management and to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within two hours when staff did not report an allegation of employee to resident verbal abuse towards one resident (Resident #1) in a timely fashion as required. The facility census was 94. Review of the facility policy, titled Area of Focus: Abuse and Neglect, review date of 11/24, showed the following: -Each resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation of any type by anyone; -Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including staff; -Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse, to the administrator and other officials including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-18 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespread
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three nurse aides (NA) (NA I, NA P, and NA Q) completed a certified nurse aide (CNA) training program and obtained certification within four months of employment at the facility as a nurse aide. The facility census was 90. Review of the facility policy titled Nurse Aide Requirements, undated, showed the following: -The facility needed to ensure the nurse aides meet the training requirements to work within a facility including a state approved training and competency program; -The facility must not use any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than four months, on a full-time basis unless that individual is competent to provide nursing and nursing related services and has completed a training and competency evaluation program; -Before allowing an individual to serve as a nurse aide, a facility must receive registry verification that the individual has met the competency evaluation requirements unless the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a manner to protect the food from possible contamination when staff failed to keep the ice machine vents, air vents, and a standing fan free of lint, debris, and grime; when staff failed to label and date refrigerated food and failed to dispose of outdated refrigerated food; and when staff failed to ensure the dishwasher rinsed the dishes at the recommended temperature and failed to ensure the chemical solution was tested properly. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. The facility had a census of 90 residents. 1. Review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food in a clean, dry location where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to maintaining cleanliness in the kitchen. Observation on 11/12/24, at 10:08 A.M., showed the following: -The ice machine outside vent had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment when staff failed to maintain the shower wall and floor tiles and mop areas in four facility shower rooms; failed to maintain the wall and grab bar integrity in one shower room; failed to maintain the wall and mop board area in the 200/400 hall sitting area; failed to adequately clean resident and make free of odors bathroom toilet area for two resident (Resident #20 and Resident #33); and failed to adequately clean and maintain the resident room sinks faucets and mirrors for four residents (Resident #20, Resident #33, Resident #36 and Resident #71). The facility census was 90. Review of a facility's policy entitled Plant Operations, reviewed 06/12/24, showed the following: -A safe, clean, and structurally sound environment shall be achieved in the facility through the development and implementation of the Plant Operations Program, the development and training of personnel, and the evaluation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-18 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident or resident's representative was notified in writing of each transfer when staff failed to provide a written notice of transfer to a hospital, including the reasons for the transfer, for four residents (Residents #81, #67, #45, and #12). The facility census was 90. Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfers and Discharges, dated 09/05/24, showed the facility will provide transfer/discharge notice to the resident/responsible party in accordance with federal regulations. 1. Review of Resident #81's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed an admission date of 02/20/24. Review of the resident's discharge Minimum Data Sheet (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 08/20/24, showed the resident discharged with return anticipated. Review of the resident's nursing progress note, dated 08/20/24, showed the resident discharged to the hospital on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-18 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure each resident received a bed-hold notice upon transfer when staff did not provide a bed-hold notice to four residents (Residents #81, #67, #45, and #12) when they transferred/discharged to the hospital. The facility census was 90. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Hold Policy, revised 11/17/22, showed the following: -The bed hold policy should be given upon admission, upon transfer to the hospital, or if the resident goes on therapeutic leave of absence; -Before the facility transfers a resident to hospital, the nursing facility must provide written information to the resident or representative the specifies duration of state bed hold policy during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the facility; the reserve bed payment policy in the state plan; the nursing facility's policies regarding bed hold periods, which must be consistent with the transfers and discharge policy, permitting a resident to return; the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow approved menus to ensure the nutritional needs of all residents were met when staff failed to provide the approved serving sizes for meals and failed to prepare pureed diets per approved recipes. The facility census was 90. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to pureed meals or portions sizes for meal service. 1. Review of the facility's menu spread sheet showed on 11/12/24 residents should have received two-fifths of a cup of mechanically altered and pureed ham and one-half cup of pureed vegetables. Observation on 11/12/24, at 11:55 A.M., showed the following: -Dietary [NAME] (DC) X placed one third cup scoops in the pureed ham, mechanical ham, and pureed vegetables; -DC X used the one third cup scoop to serve pureed ham, mechanical ham, and pureed vegetables for the pureed and mechanical diet trays for 100 hall. Review of the facility's menu spread sheet showed on 11/18/24 resident should receive four ounces of Italian meat sauce and four ounces of parsley spaghetti for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served was palatable and at temperatures that were appetizing for resident including four residents (Resident #36, #71, #72, ad #45) who often ate in their rooms. The facility census was 90. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Temperature Control, revised 06/28/24, showed the following: -Food temperatures are maintained during mealtimes to ensure residents received safe food served at acceptable temperatures; -Hot foods are held at a minimum of 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) per state requirements; -Cold foods are held at or below 41 degrees per federal guidelines, unless the state requirements are more stringent; -Food should not be placed on the steam table more than 30 minutes before meal service begins; -Maximum length of time food is held on the steam table is four hours; -Food reheated in the microwave is heated so that all parts of the food reach 165 degrees F and food is rotated, stirred, covered, and allowed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility to maintain an effective infection control program when the facility failed to screen all staff for tuberculosis (a contagious infection that usually attacks the lungs) as required when the facility failed to ensure the first step of the two-step Tuberculin (TB) skin test was completed prior resident contact for four staff member (Registered Nurse (RN) D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E, Speech Therapist (ST) F, and RN G) of 10 sampled staff members; and when staff counted resident cigarettes eight times per day by touching the cigarettes with their bare hands for eight residents (Resident #13, #18, #22, #23, #41, #52, #59, #79) out of fifteen sampled residents that were on the smoking list. The facility had a census of 90. 1. Review of the facility policy, Tuberculosis - Testing and Screening (associates and Volunteers), dated dated 09/24/24, showed the following: -The facility will evaluate each associate and volunteer for tuberculosis in accordance with current Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with dignity and respect when staff spoke to one resident (Resident #72) in a threatening manner. The facility had a census of 90. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, dated 09/10/24, showed the following: -The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility; -A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident; -The resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. 1. Review of Resident #72's face sheet (a brief information sheet about the resident) showed the following information: -admission date of 03/03/23; -Diagnoses included chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - disorder in which a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide trauma-informed care in accordance with standards of practice when staff failed to identify, assess, care plan, and provide supportive interventions for two residents (Resident #72 and #6) with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census was 90. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to Trauma Informed Care (a model of care that acknowledges the impact of trauma on people's lives and aims to provide effective services). Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, dated 09/10/24, showed the following: -At the time of admission and periodically throughout their stay, the facility will inform each resident, orally and in writing, of their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when the facility failed to complete timely assessments/reassessments of side rail use, failed to obtain physician's orders for side rail use prior to side rail use, and failed to obtain full informed consent prior to side rail use for two residents (Resident #77 and #70). The facility also failed to care plan the use of side rails and failed to document risk/benefits and alternatives attempted prior to side rail use for one resident (Resident #77). The facility census was 90. Review of the facility policy titled Bed Rails - Safe and Effective Use of Bed Rails, dated 11/16/21, showed the following: -The facility must attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail; -The facility must ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails; -The facility should assess the resident for risk of entrapment prior to installation; -Risks and benefits should be reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide all residents food that accommodated each residents' allergies, intolerances, and preferences, when staff served one resident (Resident #36) food items containing an ingredient identified as an allergen/dislike on the resident's meal ticket and when staff served one resident (Resident #38) food items the guardian had requested not be served to the resident. The facility census was 90. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Allergies and Intolerances, revised 04/25/23, showed the following: -The Director of Food and Nutrition Services obtains food preferences, including any food allergies and intolerances upon admission; -Each resident receives, and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences; -Appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice; -Facilities should be aware of each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective system of records and disposition of controlled medication when staff could not locate three cards of controlled medications and documented administration of the medication when it was not available for administration one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 81. Review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medication, last revised 02/23/23, showed the following: -The facility will ensure medications are administered safety and appropriately per physician order to address resident's diagnoses and signs and symptoms; -Medication administration is the responsibility of those individuals who through certification and licensure are authorized in their state to administer medications in a skilled nursing facility; -Staff who are responsible for medication administration will adhere to the 10 rights of medication administration, right drug, right resident, right does, right route, right time and frequency, right documentation, right assessment, right to refuse, right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for all residents, staff, and the public, when staff failed to keep the wall behind the dirty dish sink clean and failed to repair the missing caulking between the sink an wall. The facility census was 91. Review of the facility's Cleaning Schedule Policy, revised 04/25/23, shows the following information: -The Director of Food and Nutrition Services develops a cleaning schedule, with assistance from the Registered Dietician, to ensure that the Food and Nutrition Services department remains clean and sanitary at all times; -The Director of Food and Nutrition Services develops a cleaning schedule to include all equipment and areas to be cleaned; -Designated cleaning tasks are assigned to each position; -The cleaning schedule is posted in a location where it can be easily read; -The Director of Food and Nutrition Services monitors the cleaning schedule to ensure the tasks are completed timely and appropriately. Review of the facility's Kitchen Cleaning Schedule, undated, showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed ensure all food was protected from possible contamination during storage, preparation, and distribution when staff stored dented cans with other cans of food to be used in food service; stored dishes in a manner that trapped moisture; had unpasteurized eggs purchased and in the cooler for use; and failed to keep food free of contaminates when foil was stirred into noodle. The facility had a census of 88. 1. Record review of the 2017 Food Code, issued by the Food and Drug Administration, showed the following information: - Food packages should be in good condition and protect the integrity of the contents so the food is not exposed to potential contamination; - Food held for credit, such as damaged products, should be segregated and held in an area separate from other food storage. - Food packages that are damaged, spoiled or otherwise unfit for sale or use in a food establishment may become mistaken for safe and wholesome products and/or cause contamination of other foods and should be kept in separate and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment when staff failed to adequately clean resident bathroom floors for ten residents (Resident #5, #8, #19, #21, #29, #37, #45, #47, #48, and #51); failed to adequately clean resident bathroom ceiling for two residents (Resident #5 and #51); failed to adequately clean and maintain the resident room sinks for five residents (Resident #8, #21, #29, #37, and #47); failed to maintain toilets in good working order for three residents (Resident #49, #63, and #69); failed to maintain the shower floor tile in one facility shower room; and failed to maintain the tiles and mop board areas for five residents (Resident #8, #19, #29, #37, and #48). The facility census was 88. Record review of the facility policy titled Housekeeping Services, dated 8/9/22, showed the following information: -The facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment; -Keep housekeeping surfaces visibly clean on a routine basis and clean spills promptly; -The environmental supervisor will maintain a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-02 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the required Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a two level tool used to screen each resident in a nursing facility for a mental disorder or intellectual disability prior to admission) for two residents (Resident #28 and #51) and failed to complete a level two screening for one resident (Resident #68), prior to or upon admission to the facility, to ensure the resident received appropriate care and service. The facility census was 88. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding PASARRs. 1. Record review of Resident #28's face sheet (brief information sheet about the resident) showed the following information: -admission date of 3/20/2018; -Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head), delusional disorder (belief or altered reality that is persistently held despite evidence or agreement to the contrary, generally in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% when staff made seven errors out of 25 opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 28%, when staff failed to hold insulin injectable pens in place for for the recommended time following administration for two residents (Residents #73 and #67), failed to administer medication with orange juice for one resident (Resident #29), and failed to crush medications for one resident (Resident #61). The facility census was 88. Record review of a facility policy entitled Insulin Pen Administration, dated 8/10/2022, showed the following: -The facility will ensure residents with orders for insulin administration through the use of a pen delivery device is performed in accordance with current standards of practice and manufacturer's guidance; -To verify that all insulin is injected, keep the pen needle in the subcutaneous fat layer for six to ten seconds after the injection with the thumb on the push button plunger. Record review of manufacturer's current guidelines regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection control when staff did not perform appropriate hand washing before, during, or after incontinent care for four residents (Resident #6, #40, #48, and #51) and when staff failed to properly clean and disinfect glucometers (machine used to test blood glucose levels) between use for four residents (Residents #8, #29, #67 and #73). The facility had a census of 88. 1. Record review of the facility policy, Perineal (the skin in between the genitals (external reproductive organ) and anus (opening through which solid waste leaves the body)) Care of the Female Patient, dated 8/22/2022, showed the following information: -After cleaning the perineum, perform hand hygiene, apply new gloves, and apply moisture-barrier skin protectant as needed; -Discard soiled articles in the appropriate receptacle; -Remove and discard gloves; -Perform hand hygiene. Record review of the facility policy, Perineal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment when staff failed to maintain vents and non-food contact surfaces clean and free of debris. The facility census was 88. Record review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2013 Food Code showed the following information: -Non-food contact surfaces shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, or other debris. 1. Observation of the kitchen on 2/26/2023, at 9:30 A.M., showed the following: -The ice machine filter, which covered a vent on the front of the machine, was covered in a black, fuzzy substance; -In some places the black, fuzzy substance was moving with any motion of air. Observation of the kitchen on 2/26/2023, at 9:35 A.M., showed the following: -Four ceiling vents above the doors to enter the kitchen and the ice machine; -The four vents were covered in a black, fuzzy substance with some dangling downward. Observation of the kitchen on 2/26/2023, at 9:50 A.M., showed the following: -Six ceiling vents in the dishwasher room; -These six vents had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to treat each resident with dignity and respect when staff incorrectly spelled one resident's name (Resident #8) on the room name tag causing him/her to be called by the wrong name. The facility census was 88. Record review of the facility policy entitled Area of Focus: Resident Rights, dated 11/21/22, showed the following information: -A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet (brief information sheet about the resident) showed the following information: -Most recent admission date of 3/4/22; -The resident's name spelled correctly on the face sheet. Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Sheet (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument), dated 1/6/23, showed the resident's name spelled correctly and moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment as free from accident hazards possible, when staff attempted to place one resident (Resident #5) on a scale in a unsafe manner. The facility census was 88. Record review of the facility policy titled Weight Monitoring, Long-Term Care, dated 8/19/22, showed the following: - Staff should gather equipment including a scale (a type that is appropriate for the resident's condition, such as standing, wheelchair, lift, or bed), gloves, and facility-approved disinfectant; -Staff should follow the facility guidelines for obtaining weight measurements (for example, time of day, before meals, with or without shoes) to ensure consistency among staff members; -Explain the procedure to the resident according to their individual communication and learning needs to increase their understanding, allay their fears, and enhance cooperation; -Weigh the resident according to the scale manufacturer's instruction for use; -If the resident requires assistive equipment (for example, a wheelchair, walker, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when staff administered insulin to two residents (Residents #67 and #73) without holding the insulin pen in place the recommended time after injection. The facility census was 88. Record review of a facility policy entitled Insulin Pen Administration, dated 8/10/2022, showed the following: -The facility will ensure residents with orders for insulin administration through the use of a pen delivery device is performed in accordance with current standards of practice and manufacturer's guidance; -To verify that all insulin is injected, keep the pen needle in the subcutaneous fat layer for six to ten seconds after the injection with the thumb on the push button plunger. Record review of manufacturer's current guidelines regarding administration using an insulin aspart (rapid acting insulin) pre-filled pen showed the following: -Put the needle into the skin all the way; -Press and hold the button to give the dose; -Keep the button pressed and slowly count…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards when staff failed ensure the range hood and range hood extinguishing system located over the stove where staff prepared and cooked resident food did not have a buildup of grease and lint; failed to ensure the sides, legs, and bottom shelves of prep tables and steam table did not have a buildup of grease and lint; and failed to protect food from possible contamination when staff failed to follow proper handling of dishes while serving food items. The facility census was 96. Record review of the 2013 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code showed: -Non-contact food surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris; -Intake and exhaust air ducts shall be cleaned and filters changed so they are not a source of contamination by dust, dirt, and other materials; -Mats and duckboards shall be designed to be removable and easily cleanable; -Single-service and single-use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to provide privacy, dignity, and respect for all residents when staff performed blood glucose testing on two residents (Resident #28 and #78) and an insulin injection on one resident (Resident #28) in the main dining room with random residents observing the procedures and when staff completed catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care with the room door open and privacy curtain not closed for one resident (Resident #71). A sample of 21 residents was selected and the facility census was 96. 1. Record review of Resident # 78's face sheet (general resident information) in the medical record showed the following: -admission dated of 3/9/16; -Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (a disease that affects how a person's body handles insulin and glucose levels in the blood). During an observation on 11/01/19, at 11:35, Registered Nurse (RN) O entered the main dining room, went to a table, and performed a blood glucose test on the resident by puncturing a finger with a needle and obtaining a blood sample.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment when staff failed to clean shower rooms and a clean shower chair, failed to ensure one shower room was in good repair, failed to ensure one shower room door was free of scuff marks, and failed to ensure the kitchen floor was kept clean. The facility census was 96. 1. Observation on 11/05/19, at 3:21 P.M., of the shower room on the special care unit (SCU) showed black grime along the base of the tile and wall to the shower. The surveyor used a paper towel and the black grime came off the wall when wiped with a paper towel. The black grime appeared to be mold-like. The shower chair in the SCU shower had a build up of orange substance on the back of the chair and on various parts of the chair. The shower chair had a black substance on the chair between the back rest and the seat of the chair. Observation on 11/06/19, at 9:10 A.M., of the shower room on the SCU showed the black grime along the base of the tile and wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to the hospital for seven residents (Resident #15, #61, #69, #71, #79, #90, and #242). A sample of 21 residents was selected out of a facility census of 96. Record review of the facility's policy titled Transfers and Discharges, dated 5/06/19, showed the following information: -The facility ensures systems are implemented to provide written notification to the resident and resident representative prior to transfer. This written notification is provided on the Notice of Transfer or Discharge form. This information will be presented in a language and manner that the resident/resident representative can understand; -Obtain physician's order for the transfer unless it is a 911 emergency; -Explain transfer and reason to the resident and/or representative and give a copy of signed transfer or discharge notice to the resident and/or representative or person(s)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-06 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and families/legal representatives of the facility bed hold protocol at the time of a transfer to the hospital for seven residents (Resident #15, #61, #69 #71, #79, #90, and #242). A sample of 21 residents was selected out of a facility census of 96. Record review of the facility's policy, titled Bedhold/Reservation of Room, dated 5/02/19, showed the following information: -The bed-hold policy should be given upon admission, upon transfer of a resident to the hospital (if in an emergency within 24 hours), or if the resident goes on therapeutic leave of absence; -The facility will provide written information to the resident or resident representative the nursing facility policy on bed-hold periods and the resident's return to the facility to ensure that resident's are made aware of a facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy before and upon transfer to the hospital or when taking therapeutic leave of absence from the facility;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow up and notify the physician of low blood sugar levels for three residents (Resident #27, #38, and #61) and failed to document interventions of and responses to the residents' abnormal blood sugar levels for two residents (Resident # 27 and # 38). A sample of 21 residents was selected for review out of a facility census of 96. Record review of the facility's Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) Policy, dated 10/4/19, showed the following: -Decreased levels of blood glucose (sugar) to the brain can lead to seizures, coma, and death; -Follow hypoglycemia prevention and management protocol as directed; -Monitor blood glucose levels as ordered; -Recheck glucose levels within 15 minutes of treatment, and continue or monitor glucose as ordered; -Document blood glucose levels and treatment provided, as well as the resident's response to treatment. Record review of the facility's Hypoglycemic Reaction Policy, dated 9/9/19, showed the following: -The policy is intended to provide directions and guidelines for the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards when staff failed to properly disinfect glucometers (small hand-held devices that check blood glucose (sugar) levels for residents) while collecting blood glucose samples on residents with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (a disease that affects how a person's body handles insulin and glucose levels in the blood). This practice affected four residents, Resident # 65, # 78, # 241, and # 242. The facility failed to administer the two-step tuberculin (TB) test timely and failed to document results in millimeters three residents (Resident #70, #71, and #90). The facility census was 96. 1. Record review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website showed the following: -Blood glucometers approved for use for more than one person must be cleaned and disinfected. The CDC investigated multiple outbreaks of viral hepatitis (disease affecting the liver) among residents in long-term care (LTC)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's licensed staff failed to ensure the Emergency Kit (E-Kit) and the pharmacy form titled Security Lock Register matched the lock tag number on the E-Kit. The facility census was 96. 1. Record review of the document from the pharmacy titled Security Lock Register showed the following information: -On 9/18/19, staff signed the register that lock number 6260356 was taken off and a new lock number 6500499 was put on the E-Kit; -On 10/8/19, staff signed the register that lock number 6228305 was taken off and a new lock number 6500637 was put on; -On 10/14/19, staff signed the register that lock number 6228618 was taken off and a new lock number 6500637 was put on; -On 10/15/19, staff signed the register that lock number 6500637 was taken off and a new lock number 6500633 was put on; -On 10/23/19, staff signed the register that lock number 6500500 was taken off and a new lock number 650049 was put on; -On 10/25/19, staff signed the register that lock number 6500492 was taken off and a new lock number 6500448 was put on; -On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-11-06 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to post required nurse staffing information, and failed to include the resident census, in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. The facility census was 96. 1. Observation on 10/30/19, at 10:16 A.M., showed the nurse staffing not posted at the 100/300 or the 200/400 nurse station. Observation on 10/30/19, at 3:59 P.M., showed the nurse staffing hours posted on the wall behind the 200/400 nurse station. The posting did not contact the resident census. Observation on 10/31/19, at 3:14 P.M., showed the nurse staffing hours posted on the wall behind the 200/400 nurse station. The posting did not contain the resident census. Observation on 11/1/19, at 2:29 P.M., showed the nurse staffing hours posted behind nurse station was dated 10/31/19. Observation on 11/4/19, at 4:29 P.M. showed no nurse staffing hours posted. Observation on 11/5/19, at 1:41 P.M., showed no nurse staffing hours posted. During an interview on 11/5/19, at 3:00 P.M., the corporate nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Garden Terrace At Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Hammond-Whiting Care CenterWhiting, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of AndoverAndover, KS 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Cape GirardeauCape Girardeau, MO 1 of 5Life Care Center Of GrayGray, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of HixsonHixson, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Mount VernonMount Vernon, WA 1 of 5Life Care Center Of RenoReno, NV 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Sierra VistaSierra Vista, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center Of The WillowsValparaiso, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of TucsonTucson, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Life Care Center of ElkhornElkhorn, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of Hilton HeadHilton Head Island, SC 1 of 5Life Care Center of OmahaOmaha, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of PlainwellPlainwell, MI 1 of 5Life Care Ctr Of LawrencevilleLawrenceville, GA 1 of 5Rensselaer Care CenterRensselaer, IN 2 of 5Canon Lodge Care CenterCanon City, CO 2 of 5Darcy Hall Of Life CareWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Desert Cove Nursing CenterChandler, AZ 2 of 5Evergreen Nursing HomeAlamosa, CO 2 of 5Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of HoustonHouston, TX 2 of 5Hallmark ManorFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Lane House, TheCrawfordsville, IN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Altamonte SpringsAltamonte Springs, FL 2 of 5Life Care Center Of AthensAthens, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BridgetonBridgeton, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BrookfieldBrookfield, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ColumbiaColumbia, SC 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Federal WayFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of GrandviewGrandview, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of KirklandKirkland, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Merrimack ValleyBillerica, MA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Morgan CountyWartburg, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of PuyallupPuyallup, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Red BankChattanooga, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of South Las VegasLas Vegas, NV

Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
REED, BOBBYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/23/2004
CROSS, CINDYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/1999
THURMOND, JOANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/21/2000
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/31/1999

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 6%Other / private 11%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$249per resident / day
operating cost
$7,567per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$218per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265381. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next