Life Care Center Of Las Vegas

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 151 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 178 beds and averages 170.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to protect residents from ongoing and repeated sexual and/or physical contact by a cognitively impaired resident with a history of continued repeated behaviors for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 2) and 3 of 3 unsampled residents (Resident 7, 8, and 9). The deficient practice placed the residents at risk for continued nonconsensual physical contact and potential psychosocial distress.Findings include:Resident 2 (R2) was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis including dementia unspecified severity with anxiety/psychotic disturbance, depression, and adult failure to thrive.On 05/13/2026 at 1:17 PM, R2 was observed in the hallway seated in a wheelchair holding a stuffed animal. R2 looked toward the surveyor, immediately looked away, and did not acknowledge the surveyor's greeting. R2 did not interact with the surveyor and did not respond to questions. R2 was observed calm.A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], documented R2's cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to reassess, revise, or reevaluate the effectiveness of care plan interventions, despite continued sexual and/or physical behaviors for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had potential to result in ineffective management of continued sexual and physical intrusive behaviors.Findings include:Resident 1 (R1) was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy, and other specified anxiety disorders.On 05/13/2026 at 9:29 AM, R1 was observed in bed lying in bed. R1 opened their eyes, lifted their head, and nodded yes to their name being called. R1 did not engage in conversation, looked away and closed eyes.On 05/14/2026 at 3:33 PM, R1 was lying in bed with blanket covering their face. R1 responded to greeting by sitting up in bed and repeatedly said thank you. R1 did not answer any questions, laid back down in bed and covered their head with a blanket.A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to implement, and accurately complete physician ordered behavior monitoring for agitation, sexual behavior, interventions, and outcomes for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to result in failure to identify, monitor, and manage continued sexual and physical behaviors.Findings include:Resident 1 (R1) was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy, and other specified anxiety disorders.On 05/13/2026 at 9:29 AM, R1 was observed in bed lying in bed. R1 opened their eyes, lifted their head, and nodded yes to their name being called. R1 did not engage in conversation, looked away and closed eyes.On 05/14/2026 at 3:33 PM, R1 was lying in bed with blanket covering their face. R1 responded to greeting by sitting up in bed and repeatedly said thank you. R1 did not answer any questions, laid back down in bed and covered their head with a blanket.A Minimum Data Set assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan intervention to provide one-on-one (1:1) feeding assistance for a resident who was assessed to be at risk for malnutrition was implemented for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 19). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at an increased risk for malnutrition.Findings include:Resident 19 (R19) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hepatic encephalopathy, protein calorie malnutrition and altered mental status. On 01/07/2026 at 8:07 AM, R19 was seated in a chair by the bedside eating slowly and independently. R19's breakfast meal included scrambled eggs, bacon strips and milk. There were no staff members nearby or inside R19's room.A physician order dated 10/16/2025, documented to provide 1:1 feeding assistance. On 01/07/2026 at 8:24 AM, the Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed R19 had a care plan intervention to provide 1:1 feeding assistance as determined by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to provide one-on-one (1:1) feeding assistance for a resident assessed to be at risk for malnutrition for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 19). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at an increased risk for malnutrition.Findings include: Resident 19 (R19) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hepatic encephalopathy, protein calorie malnutrition and altered mental status. On 01/06/2026 in the morning, R19 responded with nonsensical speech (used words, phrases with no meaning). R19 had a gaunt face (appearing thin, bony and hollow with sunken cheeks).On 01/07/2026 at 8:07 AM, R19 was seated in a chair by their bedside eating breakfast slowly and independently. The breakfast meal included scrambled eggs, bacon strips and milk. There were no staff members nearby or inside R19's room one-on-one (1:1) feeding assistance with the meal.R19's meal ticket…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, the facility failed to ensure information gathered by hospice staff related to the resident's hospice recertification reflected the improving nutritional status for a resident with a primary hospice diagnosis of protein-calorie malnutrition for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 177). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive the resident of a higher level of medical care outside hospice services. Findings include:Resident 177 (R177) was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including protein-calorie malnutrition and hospice status.The Hospice-Nursing Facility Agreement signed 10/01/2025, documented hospice and facility shall communicate with one another regularly and as needed for each hospice resident. Each party was responsible for documenting such communications in its respective clinical record. On 01/07/2026 at 8:02 AM, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) was observed providing feeding assistance to R177. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure stored foods were stored properly and ice machines were properly cleaned for 3 of 5 ice makers in the facility. This deficient practice posed a potential risk to safety and health standards which could lead to contamination and place residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: On 11/19/2024 in the morning, there was an open bottle containing blackberry sauce in the dry food storage area with an expiration date of June 10, 2024. The Dietary Director explained the blackberry sauce should have been discarded. On 09/04/2024 in the morning, there was an ice machine in the kitchen with brownish spots on the inner ice shield, debris buildup on the metal lip between the lid and the opening of the ice chamber, and debris buildup of the front grill covering the filter of the ice machine. There was an ice machine in the 300-hall nourishment room with a debris buildup on the ice spout of the machine. There was another ice machine in the 400-hall nourishment room with a debris buildup on the ice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided information about the right to formulate an advanced directive for 2 of 31 sampled residents (Resident #74 and Resident #5). The deficient practice has the potential to deprive residents of their right for self-determination. Findings Include: Resident #74 (R74) R74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Guillain-Barre Syndrome, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and unspecified dementia. R74's social services progress note dated 07/29/2024 documented the resident was alert and oriented times three and scored a 15/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, meaning the resident is cognitively intact. The note also states the resident can make their own decisions. A resident document titled Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated 08/06/2018 was filled out by R74's ex-spouse as Do Not Attempt Resuscitation and was signed by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate state mental health authority was notified promptly following a change in condition for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident #81). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive the resident of concern and other residents of necessary behavioral health services. Findings include: Resident 81 (R81) R81 was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. On 11/19/2024 in the afternoon, R81 stated the pureed food was horrible and they rarely eat it. R81 stated had been back to the hospital a couple times since admitted to the facility. The resident had no issues with laundry and housekeeping, was receiving and happy with physical therapy, occupational therapy, and the nursing care. The resident indicated liked participating in the Activities Department events to get out of their room. R81…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised after a resident elopement for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 167). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for inappropriate care, supervision, and accidents. Findings include: Resident 137 (R137) R137 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including seizures, epilepsy, autistic disorder, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder. A Nursing Progress Event Note dated 11/03/2024 at 7:10 PM, revealed the nurse was giving medications when R137 approached the nurse to call their mother around 8:00 PM. The note revealed the following information: At around 8:10 PM the CNA opened the front door remotely for a resident family member and the family member advised there was a resident outside wearing a red shirt. The CNA went outside to check and found R137 in the street in front of the building to the right. The CNA called for help and three CNAs brought R137 back to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV