Mayfair Village Nursing Care Center
3000 Bethel Rd, Columbus, OH 43230 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (614) 889-6320 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.5% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 31.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.9% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.2% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.8% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.4% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.1% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.3% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 81.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.9%CMS range 33.2–55.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.4–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 81.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 65.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 93.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.9%CMS range 2.9–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 83.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to wear proper hair and beard restraints when serving and preparing food , practice safe storage of utensils when preparing beverages and practice safe handling of food to prevent cross contamination. This had the potential to affect all but 10 residents the facility identified as receiving enteral feeding. The census was 82.Findings include: Interview on 04/14/26 at 11:30 A.M. interview with Food Service Director # 204 confirmed dietary workers are to wear hair nets or hats to cover hair and beard restraints if they have facial hair. Observation on 04/14/26 at 11:30 A.M. of the main residents' dining room ice bin revealed a large serving utensil used to place ice in the residents' drinking cups inside the ice bin. During concurrent interview with Dietary Aide #245 it was confirmed the utensil used to scoop the ice was stored inside the ice bin. Observation with Food Service Director #204 on 04/14/26 at 11:45 A.M. of the kitchen revealed [NAME] #221 walked away from the stove top and opened oven door and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of reported sexual abuse for two (Resident #41and #61) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 82. Findings include:Review of the medical record Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 03/09/24 diagnoses included Arnold Chiari Syndrome, hydrocephalus, mood disorder, depression, benign neoplasm of the brain and adult failure to thrive. Resident was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview on Mental status (BIMS) score of 15. Review of his care plan last updated on 02/23/26 revealed he was independent for activities of daily living and walks around the facility and in the community independently. He received psychological services with contracted counseling group including a Psychiatric Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #271 every two weeks and a nurse visit every other week.Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/03/25 with diagnoses including chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to conduct an investigation when there was a report of suspected sexual abuse. This affected two residents (#41 and #61) of five reviewed for abuse. The census was 82.Findings include:Review of the medical record Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 03/09/24 diagnoses included Arnold Chiari Syndrome, hydrocephalus, mood disorder, depression, benign neoplasm of the brain and adult failure to thrive. Resident was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview on Mental status (BIMS) score of 15. Review of his care plan last updated on 02/23/26 revealed he was independent for activities of daily living and walks around the facility and in the community independently. He received psychological services with contracted counseling group including a Psychiatric Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #271 every two weeks and a nurse visit every other week.Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/03/25 with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for three residents (Resident #04, Resident #56, and Resident #61) of 22 residents reviewed. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1.Resident #04 was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses that include obstructive uropathy, chronic kidney disease (stage IIIA), and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. Review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had an active diagnosis of heart failure. Review of Resident #04's care plan completed by the facility on 02/05/26 revealed no care planning for a diagnosis of congestive heart failure. Interview with Nurse MDS Coordinator #154 at 8:48 A.M. on 4/16/26 confirmed the diagnosis of congestive heart failure was not included and addressed on the 02/05/26 care plan for Resident #04. 2.Resident #56 was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses that include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to revise resident care plans. This deficient practice effected three (Residents #16, Resident #28, and Resident #62) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 83.Findings Include:1. Review of Resident #28's medical records revealed an admission date of 2/27/26 and medical diagnosis of parkinsonism, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, abnormal gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, dysarthria and anarthria, dysphagia, and overactive bladder. Review of Resident #28's minimum data set (MDS) last updated 02/27/26 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Independence with self-care, indoor mobility, stairs, and the use of a wheel chair and walker for ambulation. Review of Resident #28's care plan last revised 3/15/26 revealed the resident has an activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was offered activities and had a detailed activities assessment and care plan. This affected one resident (#11) of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 82.Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/01/25 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dysphagia, chronic heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, and other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder.Review of Resident #11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely or never understood. Review of Resident #11's plan of care dated 11/03/25 revealed the resident was dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs. Interventions included introducing residents to residents with similar background and interests, inviting to scheduled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the Psychiatric Certified Nurse Practitioner when a resident had behavior and mood changes. This afffected one resident (#41) of two residents reviewed for behavioral, mental and emotional health care and services. The census was 82. Findings include:Review of the medical record Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 03/09/24 with a Brief Interview ofr Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive deficits. His diagnoses included Arnold Chiari Syndrome, hydrocephalus, mood disorder, depression, benign neoplasm of the brain and adult failure to thrive.Review of Resident #41's Psychiatric Certified Nurse Practitioner #271 psychiatric note on 01/30/26 revealed she indicated nursing follow up with the provider in 2-4 weeks, unless acute issue or concerns presents .Review of Resident # 41's progress notes dated 02/03/26 at 4:05 P.M. the Interdisciplinary Team recorded Resident #16 had escalating changes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely address Resident #79's Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). This affected one resident (#79) of two residents reviewed for UTI. The facility census was 82.Findings include:Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/10/25 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, cognitive communication deficit, adult failure to thrive, delirium, and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #79's progress note dated 03/03/26 at 8:29 P.M. revealed she complained of pain while urinating. The on-call nurse practitioner was notified and ordered urine to be collected for analysis.Review of Resident #79's physician order dated 03/03/26 revealed an order to collect urine for a urinary analysis with culture and sensitivity related to complaints of pain while urinating.Review of Resident #79's progress note dated 03/04/26 revealed Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #266 saw the resident due to dysuria. A urinary analysis was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #85's blood pressure medication was administered as ordered. This affected one resident (#85) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 82.Findings include: Review of Resident #85's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/02/19 with diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia, and other peripheral vascular diseases.Review of Resident #85's medical record revealed the resident was rarely or never understood. Review of Resident #85's physician order dated 12/01/25 revealed the resident was to receive Metoprolol Tartrate (beta blocker) 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for hypertension. The medication was to be held for systolic pressure less than 110 millimeters of mercury (mmHg).Review of Resident #85's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2026 and 04/01/26 through 04/14/26 revealed the Metoprolol Tartrate was administered at 9:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. There was no evidence the resident's blood pressure was monitored around this time.Review of Resident #85's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure opioid medication was approved for the resident to take during a leave of absence for Resident #61. This resulted in an unobserved significant medication error for Resident #61. This affected one resident (#61) of one resident reviewed for pain. The facility census was 82.Findings include:Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/03/25 with diagnoses including opioid abuse, heart failure, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, depression, chronic viral hepatitis C, and unspecified mood disorder.Review of Resident #61's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 30 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Her medications included antianxiety, antidepressant, opioids, diuretics, and anticonvulsants.Review of Resident #61's plan of care dated 01/10/25 revealed the resident was on pain medication therapy related to pain. Interventions included administering analgesics as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures for a resident requiring enhanced barrier precautions this affected one (#04) and the facility failed to ensure staff followed neutropenic precautions which affected one (#42) . Five residents were reviewed for infection control procedures. The facility census was 82. Findings Include: 1.Resident #04 was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses that include obstructive uropathy, chronic kidney disease (stage IIIA), and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. Review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter. Review of the Resident #04's care plan completed 02/05/26 revealed Resident #04 had an indwelling catheter related to urinary retention and was at risk of infections. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an intervention listed to reduce the risk of infections…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of five percent or less. This affected one resident (#45) of six residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 86.Findings include: 1. On 11/26/25 at 9:00 A.M. through 11:16 A.M. and 12/01/25 from 8:08 A.M. through 8:21 A.M. medication pass was observed for six residents (#2, #30, #45, #73, #75, and #76) provided by five facility staff nurses. A total of 26 observations were made with two errors resulting in an error rate of 7.69%.Record review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/02/2019. Diagnoses include unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, chronic kidney disease stage III, unspecified atrial fibrillation, other specified peripheral vascular diseases, essential (primary) hypertension, anemia, presence of cardiac pacemaker, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for Resident #45. This affected one of five residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Record review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/02/2019. Diagnoses include unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, chronic kidney disease stage III, unspecified atrial fibrillation, other specified peripheral vascular diseases, essential (primary) hypertension, anemia, presence of cardiac pacemaker, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, muscle weakness, edema, vitamin deficiency, nail dystrophy, presence of intraocular lens, and long term (current) use of anticoagulants.Review of Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be completed due to resident is rarely/never understood and confirms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to properly label and store medications. This had the potential to affect all residents who receive medications from the facility. The census was 86.Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 9:39 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #52 during medication administration revealed a facility stock bottle of Thiamine B1 (vitamin) 100 milligram (mg) tablet which was opened and undated, a facility stock bottle of Famotidine (decreases acid in the stomach) 20 mg bottle which was opened and undated, and container of MiraLAX (laxative)17 mg which was opened and undated. Other facility stock medication bottles were observed in medication cart had open dates written on top of lid of medication bottle.Interview on [DATE] at 9:45 A.M. with LPN #52 confirmed the bottles of Thiamine, Famotidine, and MiraLAX were open but were not labeled with the open date. LPN #52 was observed labeling the bottles. 2. Observation on [DATE] at 11:25 A.M. of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing and shaving. This affected (Residents #42 and #44) of three residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 80. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute embolism and thrombosis of left iliac vein, pulmonary embolism, severe protein-calorie deficiency, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, depression, and bipolar. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed it was very important for Resident #42 to choose the type of bathing. A care plan for activities of daily living dated 01/26/24 revealed Resident #42 required supervision with bathing/showering. Review of the electronic record, therapy notes, and paper documentation revealed in the last 30-days Resident #42 received a bed bath on 09/08/25 and 09/11/25, refused bathing with occupational therapy on 09/18/25, and received a sponge bath on 09/21/25. An observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess a resident after a fall and timely notify the physician. This affected one resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 80.Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/10/25 with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, dementia, depression, anxiety and fracture of left femur on 08/21/25.Review of Resident #3's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had severely impaired cognition. Since the previous assessment Resident #3 had two falls or more without injury, two falls or more with injury, and one fall with major injury.Review of Resident #3's plan of care dated 07/11/25 revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to impaired balance and lack of safety awareness due to cognitive deficit related to dementia. Interventions included assisting out of bed before meals, assisting with toileting before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3's pain was timely and appropriately addressed. This affected one resident (#3) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 80.Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/10/25 with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, dementia, depression, anxiety and fracture of left femur on 08/21/25.Review of Resident #3's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had severely impaired cognition. Since the previous assessment Resident #3 had two falls or more without injury, two falls or more with injury, and one fall with major injury.Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 07/10/25 revealed an order for Acetaminophen Tablet 325 milligrams (mg) two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed for a fever above 101 degrees Fahrenheit.Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 07/10/25 revealed an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, toxicology report review, review of the facility admission policy, review of the facility assessment and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #82 received adequate, timely and appropriate treatment and continuity of care following admission to the facility resulting in a situation of neglect. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm/subsequent death beginning on [DATE] at 8:30 P.M. when Resident #82, who had been hospitalized prior to admission, arrived at the facility for placement and staff failed to obtain physician orders for medications/treatments or contact the physician/medical director regarding the resident's admission. From [DATE] through [DATE] the resident was not ordered and did not receive medications including blood pressure medication, blood thinning medication, or insulin. In addition, Resident #82 presented to the facility with a history of illegal drug use; however, the facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed ensure care plans were comprehensive and addressed problems as stated in a self-reported incident (SRI). This affected one resident (#43) of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 81. Findings include. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 01/28/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including idiopathic aseptic necrosis of left femur, unsteadiness on feet, history of falling, type II diabetes mellitus, and memory deficit following a cerebral infarction. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was moderately cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 out of a score of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and was dependent for showering/bathe self and lower body dressing. Resident #43 was independent for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care related to tracheostomy care. This affected two (Resident #65 and #66) of three resident records reviewed for tracheostomy care. The census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, cerebral aneurysm, liver transplant, tracheostomy, dysphagia and Hepatitis C. Review of the quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was rarely/never understood, she was dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. She was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the physician's orders dated 03/25 revealed no orders for tracheostomy care. There was no documented evidence of a plan of care for tracheostomy care or documentation on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured to prevent unauthorized access. This had the potential to affect seven (Residents #35, #42, #43, #48, #50, #56 and #58) of 24 residents on 300 hallway identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The census was 81. Findings include: Observation on 03/10/25 at 8:28 A.M. of medication administration by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #25 revealed while preparing medication for Resident #38, she left the medication cart unattended leaving cards of hydroxide HCL(antihistamine) 25 milligrams (mg), Potassium Chloride ER (extended release) 20 meq (milliequivelants), Spironalactone (blood pressure medication) 25 mg, toresmide (diuretic) 20 mg, Venlafaxine (antidepressant) HCL 100 mg, Venlafaxine HCL 25 mg and a bottle of Miralax on top of the medication cart unattended and out of her sight. Interview with LPN #25 on 03/10/25 at 8:34 A.M. verified she had left the medications on top of the medication cart unattended and out of her sight.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control guidelines were maintained during tracheostomy care. This affected one (Resident #65) of two residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's medical record (SR #3) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, cerebral aneurysm, liver transplant, tracheostomy, dysphagia and Hepatitis C. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was rarely/never understood, she was dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. Review of the physician's orders dated 03/25 revealed no orders for tracheostomy care. There was no documented evidence of a plan of care for tracheostomy care or documentation on the treatment record tracheostomy care had been completed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to protect the privacy of medical information for a resident. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for privacy. The current census is 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/19/24. Diagnoses for Resident #3 included: acute necrotizing hemorrhagic encephalopathy, hypertension, Diabetes type two, and dementia. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Observation on 10/21/24 at 8:30 A.M., during a medication administration on the 100-hall, revealed on the wall in the hallway, on the right side of the door for Resident 3's room, was a piece of paper with private medical information for Resident #3. The sign read, Resident #3, nothing by mouth after midnight, pick up for his surgery will be 10/21/24 at 8:00 A.M. Resident #3 was not in the room and had already left. At the same time of the observation of the sign,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide resident dignity with use of an indwelling urinary catheter. This deficient practice affected two (#5 and #27) of four residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 81. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date 05/14/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle weakness, high blood pressure, and obstructive uropathy. Resident #5 required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks, and was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders for Resident #5 revealed an order dated 04/11/22 for a suprapubic catheter to straight drain due to chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis, and an order dated 01/28/23 for a dignity bag to cover the catheter drainage bag. Observation on 09/03/24 at 10:45 A.M. revealed Resident #5 was resting in bed with the urinary catheter drainage bag hung from the bed frame. The urinary catheter collection bag was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were maintained when a medication ordered for one (#74) was administered to another (#33) resident. This deficient practice affected two (#33 and #74) of two residents reviewed for staff borrowing medications. The facility census was 81. Findings Included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 08/01/19 with diagnoses including dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #74 had impaired cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and medication administration. Review of the physician orders for Resident #74 revealed a one-time order dated 08/07/24 for the antipsychotic medication Zyprexa 10 milligrams (mg) to be given via intramuscular (IM) injection. Further review of Resident #74 medication administration record (MAR) dated 08/07/24 revealed the order for Zyprexa 10 mg was refused by Resident #74 for administration. 2. Review of the medical record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to prevent the administration of an unnecessary antipsychotic medication. This deficient practice affected one (#33) out of two resident reviewed for antipsychotic medication use. The facility census was 81. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date for 09/09/22 with a readmission date 08/31/24. Diagnoses included epilepsy, high blood pressure, schizoaffective disorder, and traumatic brain injury. Resident #33 was assessed with impaired cognition, impaired decision making, and physical behaviors towards others. Review of the physician orders for Resident #33 revealed a one-time order dated 08/12/24 for the antipsychotic medication Zyprexa 10 milligrams (mg) to be given via intramuscular (IM) injection for increased agitation. Further review of Resident #33's medication administration record (MAR) dated 08/12/24 revealed the order for Zyprexa 10 mg was administered at 6:02 P.M. and was effective. Further review of the MAR revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to have a carbon monoxide detector in the kitchen with a gas stove present. This had the potential to affect all 90 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Observation on 08/05/24 at 9:30 A.M. revealed in the facility main kitchen, there was a gas stove within the kitchen area. There was no carbon monoxide detector in this area. Interview with Food Service Director #195 on 08/05/24 at 9:32 A.M. confirmed they did not have a carbon monoxide detector in the kitchen with a permanently installed fuel burning appliance (stove). She confirmed there is a designated spot in place to have a carbon monoxide detector, but it was not in place. She confirmed she did not know how long it had not been in place.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain smoking products. This affected one (Resident #20) of one reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abnormal posture, neuromuscular dysfunction, panic disorder, chronic fatigue and chronic pain disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0) assessment on 05/24/24 revealed Resident #20 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, revealing intact cognition, and confirmed that Resident #20 received oxygen therapy. Review of current physician's orders revealed Resident #20 received oxygen at two liters per minute every night shift. Observation on 08/08/24 at 8:51 A.M. revealed Resident #20 had a lighter and a package of cigarettes containing three cigarettes at his bedside. His oxygen was running at two liters per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to protect the privacy of Resident #18 and Resident #12's medical records. This affected two of twenty-two medical records reviewed for the annual survey. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Resident #18 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of brain, muscle weakness, encephalopathy, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Observation on 08/05/24 from 4:04 P.M. through 4:14 P.M. revealed Resident #18's electronic medical record was open on the medication cart, which was unattended by the nurse on duty. The screen was visible to passersby's and revealed Resident #18's medication schedule. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Care Coordinator #131 on 08/05/24 at 4:14 P.M. confirmed Resident #18's electronic health record was unattended, open and easily viewable to any person who passed by. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Unit Nurse #154 on 08/05/24 at 4:15 P.M. confirmed LPN Unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents were completed as required. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 90. Findings Include: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hypotension, muscle weakness, mood disorder, dysphagia, catatonic disorder due to known physiological condition, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, altered mental status, post traumatic stress disorder. anxiety disorder, hypertension, suicidal ideations, acute kidney failure, hypothyroidism, and encephalopathy. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #78's PASRR document dated 03/28/24, revealed this was the first PASRR document that was completed for him. He was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, medical record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to create a care plan related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for residents. This affected one (Resident #7) of two residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included absence right below knee amputation, cerebral palsy, muscle weakness, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and homelessness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment on 07/17/24 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognitive status. She was assessed as having a PTSD diagnosis. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed that she was assessed for trauma informed care on 03/13/24 and no events were listed or checked as being experienced by the resident. The events included sexual assault, which was listed as not being experienced by Resident #7. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review, policy review, and resident interview, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences. This affected three (Residents #4, #40 and #65) of three residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 07/10/22 with pertinent diagnoses of: Parkinson's disease, cognitive communication deficit, and hypertension. Review of the 07/03/24 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility and was always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. Interview with Resident #4 on 08/05/24 at 2:50 P.M. revealed she is not invited to attend quarterly care conferences to discuss her care in the facility. Review of the medical record on 08/08/24 revealed within the last year an interdisciplinary care conference was held on 03/05/24 where the resident and staff attended. There was no evidence that a care conference was attended by an interdisciplinary team any other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to properly monitor and accurately document skin abnormalities. This affected one (Resident #56) out of the one reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver, chronic venous insufficiency, atrial fibrillation, and skin vasculitis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #56, completed on 07/22/24, indicated that he was cognitively intact, at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and had been ordered a pressure-relieving bed. Review of the care plan for Resident #56 dated 06/22/24 revealed he is on anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation and is at risk for abnormal bleeding. Interventions included monitoring for and reporting adverse reactions to anticoagulant therapy, such as blood-tinged urine, nausea, muscle or joint pain, and bruising. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, medical record review and facility policy review, the facility did not effectively assess residents for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This affected one (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included absence right below knee amputation, cerebral palsy, muscle weakness, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and homelessness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment on 07/17/24 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognitive status. She was assessed as having a PTSD diagnosis. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed that she was assessed for trauma informed care on 03/13/24 and no events were listed or checked as being experienced by the resident. The events included sexual assault, which was listed as not being experienced by Resident #7. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, family interviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to assist with discharge planning. This affected one (Resident #82) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. Additionally, the facility failed to document discharge planning efforts and include the residents in discharge planning. This affected three (Residents #82, #31, and #50) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 10/20/23 and discharge date of 11/08/23. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, respiratory failure with hypoxia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, dependence on oxygen, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, and altered mental status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #82 was cognitively intact and required substantial and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with oxygen as ordered at discharge. This affected one (Resident #82) of three reviewed for oxygen. Facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 10/20/23 and discharge date of 11/08/23. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, respiratory failure with hypoxia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, dependence on oxygen, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, and altered mental status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #82 was cognitively intact and required substantial and maximum assistance for activities of daily living including toileting and bathing. Review of the plan of care dated 10/20/23 revealed Resident #82 was at risk for respiratory illness with interventions for oxygen settings via nasal cannula to be administered as ordered.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's preference for bathing time. This affected one (#74) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #74's medical record identified admission to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including anemia, diabetes, chronic pain, and encephalopathy. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment, and was dependent on staff for bathing. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #74 indicated it was very important to choose his own bedtime. Review of Resident #74's plan of care for activities of daily living (ADLs) identified bathing would occur every Monday and Thursday night, and staff were to provide a sponge bath when a full bath or shower could not be tolerated. Interview with Resident #74 on 11/30/23 at 6:07 A.M. stated he received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a safe, clean, and homelike manner. This affected three residents (#11, #47, and #48) out of five residents reviewed for the environment. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included arthritis, type two diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/05/23, revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact. Observation on 10/25/23 at 9:40 A.M. revealed there was cracked and chipped paint along with chunks of plaster missing along the baseboard heating unit in Resident #11's room. Additionally, the privacy curtain in Resident #11's room had brown specks splashed on it. Interview with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #400 on 10/25/23 at 9:45 A.M. verified there was cracked and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to accommodate residents cultural preferences for meals. This affected one (Resident #11) out of three residents reviewed for meals. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included arthritis, type two diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 09/05/23, revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact and required supervision and set-up assistance with eating. Review of Resident #11's physician order, dated 03/29/21, revealed Resident #11 had a physician order for a consistent carbohydrate diet. Review of Resident #11's comprehensive care plan revealed it did not address Resident #11's cultural preferences and requests related to meals. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed no evidence the facility had asked Resident #11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-14 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the surety bond remained adequate to cover all resident account totals. This had the potential to affect all 30 Residents (#1, #7, #9, #11, #16, #17, #18, #21, #22, #23, #30, #34, #35, #36, #39, #42, #48, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #61, #66, #67, #68, #69, #74) who had an open resident fund account. The facility census was 77. Findings Include: Review of the surety bond dated 05/15/20 revealed the surety bond capacity was $30,000. Review of monthly balance information revealed the Resident account balances totaled over $30,000 each month since 05/2020. In 05/2020, the balance was $45,762.70. In 06/2020, the balance was $46,477.93. In 07/2020, the balance was $41,722.65. In 08/2020, the balance was $43,836.74. In 09/2020, the balance was $38,335.02. In 10/2020, the balance was $36,022.80. In 11/2020, the balance was $34,233.47. In 12/2020, the balance was $31,815.33. In 01/2021, the balance was $38,717.46. In 02/2021, the balance was $36,898.56. In 03/2021, the balance was $31,793.88. In 04/2021, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a clean, homelike environment, and the room, furniture, and privacy curtain were clean and in good repair. This affected eight (Resident #4, #5, #6, #11, #25, #38, #46 and #432) out of 77 residents residing in the facility. The census was 77. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/07/22 between 9:55 A.M. and 3:58 P.M. revealed the following findings: • Resident #4 and Resident #38's shared privacy curtains were soiled with black marks along the bottom third of the curtains. Both curtains had three to four areas of dried brown liquid on them. • Resident #4's overbed table was in disrepair and was delaminating. • Resident #4's right wheelchair arm was loose, slanted, and the material was peeling off of the armrest. • Resident #4's side table was cracked and broken on the left front. The banding around the top of the side table was loose and detached. • Resident #11's overbed table was in disrepair and was delaminating. • Resident #11's room wall next to his bed had paint peeling along half the width…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-14 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified of resident transfers and discharges. This affected four (Resident #32, #40, #46, and #330) of five residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility census was 77. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 11/16/21. Resident #32's diagnoses included diabetes type two, COVID-19, and fractured nasal bones. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed Resident #32 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence to indicate the Ombudsman was notified of Resident #32's discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 02/05/21. Resident #40's diagnoses included type two diabetes, osteomyelitis or vertebra, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed Resident #40 was discharged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and review of facilty policy, the facility failed to ensure nail care and oral care was provided for dependent residents. This affected five (Residents #5, #12, #56, #65 and #72) out of five residents reviewed for nail and oral care. The census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 02/21/17 with diagnoses including visual loss, mixed receptive language disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making, required extensive assist of two for bed mobility and transfers, and was totally dependent of one for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #5's activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit plan of care dated 08/03/20 revealed Resident #5 had an ADL self-care performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of manufactures instructions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly, not stored with food, and expired medication and laboratory vials were disposed of. This affected nine (Resident #2, #3, #27, #34, #39, #45, #48, #55, and #435) out of 77 residents in the facility. The census was 77. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/09/22 at 12:23 P.M. of the 400 back hall medication cart revealed Resident #48's Dorzolamide HCL ophthalmic solution two percent (%), Resident #55's Combigan 0.2% ophthalmic solution, rhopressa topical eye drops, Dorzolamide HCL two percent eye drops, and two open boxes of latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005% (one undated when opened) were in the same compartment of the top drawer as Resident #48's calcitonin salmon nasal spray, Resident #34's Ventolin 90 microgram (mcg) inhaler, Resident #27's Albuteral Sulfate 90 mcg inhaler, and Debrox ear wax removal with no resident name on the box. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident advanced directives were accurate. This affected one (Resident #53) out of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 77. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/04/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, Parkinson's disease, dementia without behaviors, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was rarely or never understood. Review of Resident #53's physician orders dated 12/13/21 revealed an order to change Resident #53's code status to Do Not Rescuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC). Review of Resident #53's physician orders dated 12/23/21 revealed an order to admit to hospice services with terminal diagnosis of protein calorie malnutrition. Review of documentation in the advanced directives tab in Resident #53's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse. This affected one (Resident #56) out of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 01/03/18. Diagnoses included diabetes type two, unspecified mood disorder, and delusional disorder. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 was cognitively intact, required supervision set up assistance for transfers and bed mobility, and required one person assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the Resident #56's electronic medical record revealed no documentation of an altercation with his roomate on 01/24/22. Review of the self-reported incident (SRI) #217060, dated 01/25/22, revealed Resident #54 had a recent history of exhibiting sexual and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse. This affected one (Resident #56) out of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 01/03/18. Diagnoses included diabetes type two, unspecified mood disorder, and delusional disorder. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 was cognitively intact, required supervision set up assistance for transfers and bed mobility, and required one person assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the Resident #56's electronic medical record revealed no documentation of an altercation with his roomate on 01/24/22. Review of the self-reported incident (SRI) #217060, dated 01/25/22, revealed Resident #54 had a recent history of exhibiting sexual and aggressive behaviors toward staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notices were provided upon transfer to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #46) of four residents reviewed for bed hold notices. The census was 77. Findings include: Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of right female breast, COVID-19, and secondary malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile duct. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an order dated 01/16/22 to send Resident #46 to the emergency room for evaluation. Resident #46 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Bed Hold Authorization dated 01/24/21, with the added date of 01/16/22 written above the 01/24/22 date, revealed the bed hold authorization for Resident #46's discharge to the hospital on [DATE] was signed on 01/24/21 by Resident #46's representative. Interview on 02/09/22 at 9:02 A.M. with Receptionist #86 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to accurately complete Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents. This affected two (Resident #53 and #56) of three residents reviewed for PASRR's. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/04/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, Parkinson's disease, dementia without behaviors, major depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the plan of care dated 12/29/21 revealed Resident #53 had depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia with interventions to provide medications as ordered, have a regular routine, and consult psychiatry services if indicated. Review of Resident #53's PASRR dated 12/04/14 revealed the resident's diagnosis of anxiety and schizophrenia were not included on the PASRR. Interview on 02/08/22 at 12:44 P.M. and 12:56 P.M. with Social Worker (SW) #71 revealed Resident #53's most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure plans of care were revised to include accurate fall interventions. This affected two (Resident #32 and #72) of four residents reviewed for falls. The census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 10/29/21 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Review of Resident #72's medical record revealed on 01/17/22, the resident was found on the floor in a supine position. There was no evidence of a new intervention until 02/08/22, when an intervention to encourage to be in common area when out of bed was added to the plan of care. Further review of Resident #72's medical record revealed on 01/25/22, the resident was found on the floor on his back. Interventions included for Resident #72's bed to be in the lowest position, a fall mat, and to use the call light. Review of Resident #72's falls plan of care dated 11/01/21 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #66) out of five residents reviewed for weight records. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/24/17 and re-admission date of 09/12/21. Resident #66 had medical diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF) and diastolic heart failure with a pacemaker. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed on 01/22/22, Resident #66 went to a heart disease management appointment for a check up and returned with new physician orders. The new physician orders, dated 01/22/22, included monitor weight daily and notify heart disease management for weight gain of three pounds in two days or five pounds in one week. Review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #66's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure falls were documented and interventions were in place. This affected one (Resident #72) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and non traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Review of Resident #72's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making, required extensive assist of two for bed mobility and transfer, did not walk, required extensive assist of one for eating and personal hygiene, and had a fall with major injury. Review of Resident #72's care plan dated 11/01/21 revealed Resident #72 was at risk for falls related to cerebral infarction, history of falls, type two diabetes, hypertension, muscle weakness, hyperlipidemia, incontinence,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy syringes were rinsed after use and resident's had a dressing around their tube feeding site. This affected two (Resident #65 and #72) of two residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed the resident was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, atherosclerotic heart disease, epilepsy, and gastro-esphageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of Resident #65's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely or never understood, was totally dependent on two staff for bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene, transfers, dressing, and required extensive assistance of one staff for eating, and had a tube feeding. Review of Resident #65's activities of daily living (ADL) care plan dated 08/28/20 revealed Resident #65 had an ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen supplies were dated and tracheostomy (trach) supplies were available at bedside as ordered. This affected one (Resident #65) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified 10 Residents who received respiratory treatments. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed the resident was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, atherosclerotic heart disease, epilepsy, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of Resident #65's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely or never understood, was totally dependent of two staff for bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene, transfers, dressing, and had oxygen and a tracheostomy. Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed the resident was decannulized by respiratory therapy on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy monthly medication reviews, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident drug allergies were identified and addressed during monthly pharmacy medication regimen reviews. This affected two (Resident #32 and #66) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/16/21. Resident #32 had medical diagnoses including dysphagia, stroke, and major depression. Review of Resident #32's electronic medical record and paper chart drug allergies revealed Neurontin was listed as a drug allergy. Review of Resident #32's medications orders for February 2022 revealed an order for Neurontin 300 mg every bedtime. Resident #32 had been receiving the Neurontin 300 mg medication since 11/30/21. Review of Resident #32's pharmacy medication regimen review dated 12/07/21, 01/10/22, and 02/08/22, revealed none of the pharmacy medication regimen reviews identified Resident #32 had a listing of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 02/21/17 with diagnoses including anemia, hypernatremia, abnormal liver function, vitamin D deficiency, and vitamin B-12 deficiency. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed the last magnesium level was completed on 09/24/20 and was 1.8 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) which was within the normal range of 1.3-2.1 mg/dl. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 11/16/20 for Magnesium Oxide Tablet 400 milligrams twice a day. Review of Resident #5's physician orders dated 06/10/21 revealed an order for a magnesium level on the first of the month and every six months. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed there was no evidence of a magnesium level having been completed since 09/24/20. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of a dental appointments log, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided to residents in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #53) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/04/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, Parkinson's disease, dementia without behaviors, and vascular disease. Review of Resident #53's plan of care dated 12/29/21 revealed Resident #53 had potential oral health problems with no natural teeth and wore upper dentures. Resident #53 was to be seen by the dentist to get lower dentures with interventions to consult the dietitian as needed, and provide oral and denture care daily. Review of Resident #53's progress notes dated 04/09/21 revealed Resident #53 was edentulous and wore upper dentures. Resident #53 revealed he did not have his lower denture and would like a new one. Social services was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure hospice records including the hospice plan of care were accessible and maintained in the facility. This affected one (Resident #53) of one resident reviewed for hospice. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/04/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, Parkinson's disease, dementia without behaviors, and vascular disease. Review of Resident #53's physician orders dated 12/13/21 revealed an order to change Resident #53's code status to Do Not Rescuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC). Review of Resident #53's physician orders dated 12/23/21 revealed an order to admit to hospice services with a terminal diagnosis of protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed no hospice notes were found in either an electronic medical record or hard chart. Interview on 02/10/22 at 10:35 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #134 revealed the facility does not have hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAYFAIR MEDICAL INVESTORS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 10/29/2018 |
| LONG, ZOFIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/15/2004 |
| OLLANGG, MELISSA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/31/2025 |
| CROSS, CINDY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/21/1994 |
| HENRY, TERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/16/1999 |
| THURMOND, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/22/2000 |
| CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES HEALTH CARE | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/1985 |
| LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/31/2025 |
| FLETCHER, TODD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2001 |
| LAY, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/24/2017 |
| MATHUR, DEEPA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/31/2025 |
| PRESTON, AUBREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/06/2025 |
| SWANKER, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| ZIEGLER, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/18/2001 |
| PRESTON, FORREST | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365410. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.