Valley West Health Care Center
2300 Warren Street, Eugene, OR 97405 · For profit - Corporation · 121 certified beds · (541) 686-2828 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $3,145 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-11)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.6% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.3% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.2% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 4.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 2.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.2% | 20.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.4% | 12.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 5.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.3% | 21.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.6% | 13.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.9% | 81.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 37.7% | 21.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.2% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.8%CMS range 47.7–71.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.7–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 77.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.4–14.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 76.6 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.59 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2022-12-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 11 and 42) reviewed for medication administration. Resident 11 was administered an extended release antihypertensive medication in an inappropriate manner placing her/him at risk for clinical complications. Alteration of the medication's absorption properties can cause serious side effects up to and including fatal overdose. This failure was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 10/2021 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), heart failure and high blood pressure. A physician's order dated 12/16/21 revealed diltiazem extended release 12 hours (for high blood pressure) was to be administered daily. On 12/6/22 at 10:06 AM Staff 31 (CMA) was observed to open a capsule of medication diltiazem HCL ER (12 hour) and place the contents in applesauce. Resident 11 was then observed to chew her/his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of hydration and nutrition status for 5 of 9 sampled residents (#s 7, 16, 20, 54 and 259) reviewed for hydration and nutrition. Resident 7 experienced a severe weight loss. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 10/2022 with diagnoses including altered mental status and falls. Resident 16's record revealed fluid intake from 11/17/22 through 11/29/22 as follows: -11/17/22-1640 ml for the day -11/18/22-1,080 ml for the day -11/19/22-1,190 ml for the day -11/20/22-360 ml for the day -11/21/22-730 ml for the day -11/22/22-1,080 ml for the day -11/23/22-480 ml for the day -11/24/22-480 ml for the day -11/25/22-340 ml for the day -11/26/22-360 ml for the day -11/27/22-1,360 ml for the day -11/28/22-720 ml for the day -11/29/22-1,320 ml for the day The recommended day daily fluid intake was 2,220 ml a day. Observations from 11/28/22 through 12/1/22 on day and evening shifts revealed no fluids in Resident 16's room. On 11/28/22 at 1:47 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by staff for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 101) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 101 was admitted to the facility in 2022, with diagnoses including a below the knee amputation, mood disturbance, and anxiety. An Incident Report dated 5/26/25 indicated there was a physical altercation involving Staff 2 (CNA) against Resident 101. Resident 101 yelled profanities at and flailed her/his arms at Staff 2 during personal cares. Staff 2 grabbed the resident's wrists to calm her/him down then hit the residents left wrist area three times. Staff 2 ran out of the room and self-reported striking the resident to the nurse. Staff 2 was suspended pending an investigation, the Executive Director, the Police, and the State Agency were notified, and an investigation was started. A 5/26/25 Progress Note indicated Staff 2 came out of the resident's room crying and stated she had punched the resident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to staff a registered nurse (RN) for 8 consecutive hours per day 7 days per week for 4 out of 34 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet assessment needs. Findings include: A review of Direct Care Staff Daily Report revealed there were no RNs scheduled on 7/6/24, 7/7/24, 7/20/24, 7/21/24, or 8/3/24. On 5/22/25 at 12:33 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged there were no RNs scheduled on on the above dates. The deficient practice was identified as Past Noncompliance based on the following: In 10/2024, the deficient practice was identified by the facility and was corrected when the facility completed a staffing root cause analysis and determined the facility needed to hire an additional RN. The plan of correction included hiring an agency RN on 10/21/24 to ensure seven day a week RN coverage.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Infection Control Guidelines related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 13 of 13 sampled resident rooms (#s 3, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 29, and 33) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for exposure to infections and cross contamination. Findings include: The CDC's 4/2/24 implementation of Nursing Home PPE guidelines for prevention of spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) included a trash bin was to be placed inside the resident room and near the exit for discarding PPE after removal, prior to exit of the room. On 5/19/25 at 10:12 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have enhanced barrier precaution signage next to the door. A plastic storage bin with new PPE in the drawers and a garbage bin with used PPE inside was observed outside of the resident's room. On 5/19/25 at 1:20 PM Staff 10 (CNA) performed hand hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and received pneumococcal vaccines for 4 of 7 sampled residents (#s 31, 52, 267, and 268) reviewed for vaccines. This places residents at risk for pneumonia. Findings include: A review of the revised 4/8/25 facility Pneumococcal Vaccine policy for residents revealed the following: 1. Each resident should be offered pneumococcal immunizations, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been immunized. 2. Consents and declinations should be documented using the Med-Pass form (CP-1900P-25) and placed in the medical record. The facility should re-address the refusal with the resident and/or resident representative each year to ensure they have not changed their decision. These conversations should be captured in the medical record. 1. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with a diagnosis of heart failure. Resident 31's clinical record revealed she/he was eligible for, but was not offered a pneumococcal vaccine. On 5/22/25 at 11:16…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct a Significant Change MDS assessment within the required timeframe for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#18) reviewed for hospice. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include: Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 12/2024 with diagnoses including heart failure. A 4/30/25 Progress Note revealed Resident 18 admitted to hospice services on 4/25/25. A Significant Change MDS assessment dated [DATE] was completed on 5/21/25, 27 days after Resident 18 admitted to hospice. On 5/23/25 at 8:36 AM Staff 15 (RN MDS Coordinator) stated Resident 18's Significant Change MDS assessment was not completed within 14 days after Resident 18 was admitted to hospice.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed failed to complete a referral for a Level ll PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for PASARR. This placed residents with a mental health disorder at risk for delayed care, emotional distress related to mental illness and lack of services to attain their highest practicable well-being. Findings include: Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses including schizophrenia (chronic mental disorder characterized by symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, and cognitive challenges), polydipsia (excessive thirst), hyponatremia (a condition where sodium levels are low often due to excessive water consumption), and panic disorder. A 11/25/24 Level 1 PASARR was completed by the hospital on admission to the facility, no indication of serious mental illness was indicated. A 11/25/24 hospital discharge summary revealed Resident 18 had suicidal ideation on admission to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for CBGs and medications for 2 of 8 sampled residents (#s 8 and 218) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for ineffective medication regimen. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 12/2024 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 8's hospital After Visit Summary revealed she/he was on oral diabetic medication and CBGs were to be checked three times a day. Resident 8's 12/17/24 nurse practitioner note revealed Resident 8 reported at home she/he checked her/his CBGs up to five times a day. The nurse practitioner indicated the plan was to initiate CBG monitoring. Resident 8's clinical record did not include staff perform CBG monitoring. On 05/22/25 at 10:49 AM Staff 4 (LPN Unit Manger)stated when a resident was admitted to the facility, medical records staff entered orders into a resident's electronic record, a floor nurse reviewed the orders entered by the medical records staff, and then a second nurse reviewed the orders prior to implementing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the care plan related to bathing was followed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injuries. Findings include: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including depression and muscle weakness. The 2/19/25 Annual MDS revealed Resident 16 had a BIMs score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the 3/14/25 Care Plan revealed Resident 16 required one person assistance for bathing. A facility reported incident dated 3/29/25 revealed Staff 6 (CNA) was reported to have escorted Resident 16 to the shower room, set the resident up and left the resident to shower independently. On 3/29/25 at 7:30 PM Resident 16 reported the incident to Staff 5 (LPN) and expressed she/he felt it was neglectful to have been left alone, but did not report feeling unsafe. On 5/21/25 at 11:35 AM Resident 16 stated she/he remembered the incident on 3/29/25. Resident 16 stated she/he was taken into the shower room, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to process physician laboratory orders timely for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in 12/2024 with diagnoses including hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid gland is underactive). A review of Physician Orders revealed a 2/19/25 order for TSH (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone)lab. A review of Resident 35's medical record revealed a TSH lab was completed on 3/25/25. On 5/23/25 at 8:41 AM Staff 4 (LPN Unit Care Coordinator) acknowledged the TSH was ordered on 2/19/25 and completed on 3/25/25. Staff 4 stated the TSH lab was not completed timely.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity related to dining needs for 1 of 2 sampled dining areas reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for lack of a dignified dining experience. Findings include: On 2/5/24 from 11:30 AM through 12:37 PM during lunch observations in the independent dining room, multiple residents asked staff for beverages but were told by staff they needed to wait and someone would be right with them. Multiple times staff did not return to assist the residents with their request. On 2/5/24 at 11:35 AM a resident was observed sitting in the independent dining room with a cup of coffee and seven residents were observed in the independent dining room without any beverages. On 2/5/24 at 12:43 PM Staff 7 (CNA) was asked to explain her process for serving resident meals. Staff 7 stated staff was to serve residents sitting at one table before moving to the next table. Staff 7 stated there were a lot of new staff and they were still trying to learn the process. On 2/5/24 at 12:50 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to transmit resident assessments in the required timeframe for 5 of 5 residents (#s 18, 47, 54, 55, and 56) reviewed for late assessments. Findings include: 1. Residents 18 was admitted in 2023 with diagnoses including a fracture. The clinical record indicated a discharge assessment dated [DATE] was completed but was not transmitted until 2/5/24. On 2/9/24 at 10:58 AM Staff 10 (Regional Director of Clinical Operations) stated the assessment was completed but was not transmitted in the required timeframe. 2. Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including a fracture. The clinical record indicated a discharge assessment dated [DATE] was completed but was not transmitted until 2/5/24. On 2/9/24 at 10:58 AM Staff 10 (Regional Director of Clinical Operations) stated the assessment was completed but was not transmitted in the required timeframe. 3. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Resident 168 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of heart failure. A 11/20/23 admission MDS and associated CAAs revealed Resident 168 was assessed to have cognitive impairment. A 12/5/23 Incident Summary revealed on 12/5/23 Resident 168 alleged on the night shift of 12/4/23 she/he was restrained and two CNAs of the opposite gender messed with her/him. The facility investigated the incident and was not able to support the resident's allegations. Progress Notes from 12/5/23 through 12/11/23 did not include the staff monitored Resident 168 to ensure she/he did not have psychosocial outcome related to her/his allegations of abuse. On 2/8/24 at 10:43 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated if a resident reported abuse, even when the allegation was not supported, staff were to monitor the resident for 72 hours to ensure the resident felt safe. Staff 2 stated the staff did not monitor the resident. Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders, monitor for abuse and respond to changes in condition in a timely manner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#33) and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including heart failure. A 12/4/23 Significant Change MDS indicated Resident 33 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance from staff for toileting and brief changes. Review of 8/17/23 Resident Council Notes revealed residents had long call light wait times. On 9/1/23 a public complaint was received which indicated on night shift at times the facility only had one CNA working for 47 residents, and call light wait times were an hour and a half to two hours long. On 8/25/23 Resident 33 waited for a brief change for one hour and 55 minutes. A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 7/1/23 through 8/31/23 revealed the facility did not have sufficient CNA staff to meet the State minimum CNA to resident staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were honored for 1 of 1 facility reviewed. This place residents at risk for lack of honored preferences. Findings include: 1. On 2/5/24 at 4:10 PM Staff 18 (Social Service Assistant) stated he was working as the Dietary Manager for the past eight months until a few weeks ago. Staff 18 stated he was aware of residents' concerns related to not having food preferences honored. On 2/7/24 at 8:21 AM Staff 7 (CNA) served Resident 33's breakfast. Resident 33 stated that's not mine I never order scrambled eggs. Resident 33 stated this happened a lot and the kitchen did not give residents what they ordered. On 2/7/24 at 9:18 AM Staff 23 (Cook) was asked about how staff made her aware of residents' food preferences, if they had any residents who were vegetarian and what their process included. Staff 23 confirmed Resident 368's diet slip indicated she/he was a vegetarian. Staff 23 stated the kitchen did not have a good variety of vegetarian options and the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement consistent use of PPE in 2 of 5 halls and failed to perform hand hygiene when required while assisting dependent residents to eat in 1 of 2 dining rooms. This placed residents at risk for communicable diseases and spread of infection. Findings include: According to Oregon Health Authority Guidance staff caring for residents with suspect or confirmed COVID-19 are required to wear a fit-tested N95 respirator, eye protection, gown, and gloves. Public health may recommend unit-wide use of N95 and eye protection if facility is experiencing an outbreak to reduce the risk of transmission from asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic individuals. It may be appropriate to implement extended use of N95s and eye protection for the sequential care of a large volume of COVID-19 patients. Extended use should not be used when other organisms are present (e.g., multidrug-resistant organisms). Gowns and gloves are to be used for one resident, one encounter. Practice single use disposable PPE (one per resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician for a change of condition for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#33) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment. Findings include: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including heart failure. A 11/19/23 Administration Note instructed staff to administer Lisinopril two times a day for high blood pressure and hold for heart rate under 50. The note indicated vitals were outside of parameters and medication was not administered and the nurse was aware. A review of Resident 33's vital summaries from 11/1/23 through 11/18/23 revealed the following: -Pulse Summary: ranged between 56 to 88 beats per minute. -Respiration Summary: ranged between 14 to 20 breaths per minute. -O2 (Oxygen levels) Summary: Oxygen level was checked on 11/7/23 and was 92 percent. -Blood Pressure Summary: ranged between 134 systolic and 68 diastolic and 168 systolic 56 diastolic. A review of Resident 33's vital summaries on11/19/23 revealed the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#50) reviewed for vision and medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of dementia. a. A 1/11/23 admission MDS and 1/24/24 Annual MDS and associated CAAs revealed Resident 50 had a visual impairment and it placed the resident at risk for falls, decline in ADLs, decline in cognitive function and pain. The CAAs indicated a care plan was to be developed to ensure the resident's vision did not negatively impact the resident. Resident 50's care plan last revised 1/17/24 did not include a focused area to address the resident's impaired vision. On 2/8/24 at 11:05 AM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged Resident 50 was assessed to be at risk for impaired vision but a care plan was not developed. Refer to F685. b. A 1/24/24 Annual MDS and associated CAAs revealed Resident 50 had dementia with behavior disturbances and was administered Seroquel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to involve residents in the care planning process and revise care plan interventions for 3 of 10 sampled residents (#s 8, 50 and 168) reviewed for care plans, restraints and medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including paraplegia (inability to move the lower parts of the body) and UTI. A 2/23/23 Care Management note revealed Resident 8 was involved in her/his care plan discussion and staff were present to hear her/his concerns. On 2/5/24 at 12:25 PM Resident 8 stated staff did not routinely involve her/him in the discussion of her/his care. Resident 8 last recalled a discussion of her/his care plan concerns with staff in 2/2023. On 2/9/24 at 12:39 PM Staff 3 (Social Services Director) confirmed discussions with Resident 8 about her/his plan of care were not completed quarterly as requested. 2. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses of a finger fracture and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#317) reviewed for ADLs. This placed resident at risk for lack of personal hygiene. Findings include: Resident 317 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including chronic pain and muscle weakness. A 7/6/22 care plan indicated Resident 317 required one staff to assist with her/his shower or bed bath three times a week at night. The 8/2023 Documentation Survey Report indicated Resident 317 received bathing once on 8/4/23 for the entire month. There was no documentation Resident 317 refused bathing services. On 2/6/24 at 10:54 AM Resident 317 stated she/he did not receive bathing as expected in 8/2023 and staff continued to state her/his lack of bathing was related to the facility's lack of staffing. On 2/8/24 at 12:50 PM Staff 28 (CNA) indicated she cared for Resident 317 often, confirmed in 8/2023 the facility was routinely short of staff and the morning shift was to offer bathing the next day if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist in vision care needs for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#50) reviewed for vision. This placed residents at risk for a decline in leisure activities. Finding include: Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. A 1/11/23 admission MDS and 1/24/24 Annual MDS and associated CAAs revealed Resident 50 had impaired vision and it placed the resident at risk for falls, a decline in ADLs and overall decline in health. The assessment indicated the resident did not wear glasses, had blurred vision and preferred dim lighting. The resident was assessed to have a good memory. The CAAs indicated visual function and status would be addressed in the care plan. Resident 50's care plan did not address her/his visual impairment, need for glasses or other factors which impacted the resident's quality of life or quality of care due to poor vision. On 2/5/24 at 1:23 PM Resident 50 stated she/he had glasses but they broke at the facility, and she/he needed glasses.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement physician orders related to a pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including paraplegia (inability to move the lower parts of the body) and UTI. A 5/22/23 revised care plan revealed Resident 8 was at risk for skin breakdown due to chronic right hip wound which opened periodically. A 5/31/23 physician order indicated Resident 8's air mattress should be monitored every shift and settings kept at 2. A 6/14/23 clinic wound healing assessment indicated Resident 8 was assessed for a Stage 3 (full thickness tissue loss) right ischial (large bone in the lower part of the hip) pressure injury and her/his air mattress appeared to be improperly inflated and could be a potential cause for Resident 8's wound deterioration. The 1/2024 and 2/2024 TARs did not indicate Resident 8's air mattress was monitored. On 2/8/24 at 3:34 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a restorative program to prevent further decline in range of motion and to apply devices as ordered for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 17, 38, and 50) reviewed for ROM. This placed residents at risk for decline in their range of motion abilities. Findings include: 1. Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnosis including contracture of the left hand. Physician orders signed 1/26/24 instructed staff to apply a left-hand splint in the evening and remove in the morning. A 1/2024 TAR instructed staff to apply a left-hand splint in the evening and remove in the morning. The following entries instructed the reader to review notes: -1/10/24 night shift. -1/13/24 night shift. -1/16/24 night shift -1/18/24 evening shift. -1/19/24 night shift. A review of Administration Notes for Resident 17's left hand splint from 1/13/24 through 1/20/24 revealed the following: -1/11/24 cannot locate. -1/14/24 splint not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders to maintain healthy parameters of nutritional status and monitor for weight loss for 2 of 4 residents (#s 24 and 61) reviewed for hydration and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for weight loss. Findings include: 1. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 2016 with diagnoses including dementia and depression. A 6/1/23 physician order indicated Resident 24 was to receive a supplement health shakes with each meal. A 6/5/23 care plan intervention for Resident 24's dementia indicated she/he was to receive one on one assistance with all meals. The Weight Summary for Resident 24 revealed the following: -6/1/23 -126.8 pounds -8/3/23 -128.8 pounds -9/1/23 -121 pounds -10/1/23 -120.6 pounds -1/4/23 -116.6 pounds The Documentation Survey Report revealed the following: -7/2023, Resident 24 received greater assistance than cueing (an indirect signal) to eat during 14 of 93 meals . -8/2023, Resident 24 received greater…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#40) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for ineffective medications and medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including PTSD and depression. On 12/1/23 the pharmacist recommended the facility complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) test to evaluate Resident 40 due to her/his use of antipsychotic medications. On 1/10/24 the pharmacist recommended the facility monitor the hours of sleep for Resident 40 due to the use of trazadone (antidepressant used for insomnia). There was no evidence in the clinical record an AIMS test was completed or the hours of sleep were monitored for Resident 40. On 2/9/24 at 12:31 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated she could not locate an AIMS test and there was no information related to monitoring trazadone.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor the use of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#40) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for ineffective medications and medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including PTSD and anxiety. A review of the 2/2023 MAR indicated Resident 40 received Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) and trazadone (antidepressant used to treat insomnia). There was no evidence in the clinical record an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) test was completed or the hours of sleep were monitored for Resident 40. On 2/9/24 at 12:31 PM the monitoring of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications was discussed with Staff 2 (DNS). Staff 2 stated she could not locate a completed AIMS test or monitoring for the effectiveness of trazadone.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The Life Care Centers of America Policy and Procedure: Lab Procedures and Diagnostics for Collecting a Stool Specimen dated 9/20/23 indicated the following: The facility will provide Collecting a Stool Specimen in accordance with professional standards of practice, as outlined by [NAME] through the procedure (helps nursing staff achieve clinical excellence, with access to the latest evidence-based clinical information). Because it it's possible to obtain stool specimens on demand, proper collection requires careful patient instructions to ensure an uncontaminated specimen. Special Considerations: Place stool specimens in a refrigerator used only for specimens. If testing for Clostridioides difficle (C. Diff), (a germ (bacterium) that causes diarrhea and colitis (an inflammation of the colon) that can be life-threatening, collect only diarrheal (unformed) stool unless you suspect ileus (decrease in flow of intestinal contents) due to infection. According to the CDC the C. Diff toxin is very unstable. The toxin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 24 and 33) observed during dining observations. This placed residents at risk for lack of honored preferences and nutrition. Findings include: 1. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including heart failure. On 2/5/24 at 4:10 PM Staff 18 (Social Service Assistant) stated he was working as the Dietary Manager for the past eight months until a few weeks ago and was aware menus were not followed. On 2/7/24 at 8:21 AM Staff 7 (CNA) served Resident 33's breakfast. Resident 33 stated residents often did not receive what was on the menu. Resident 33 further stated she/he raised this concern during residential council, but nothing was ever resolved and staff continued to not follow the menu. On 2/8/24 at 11:30 AM a sample lunch tray was requested to include: country fried steak, cream gravy, mashed potatoes, confetti coleslaw, dinner roll, a chocolate chip bar, juice and a vegetarian option. Staff 19 (Cook) stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to ensure an ordered diet texture was provided as ordered for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary needs. Findings include: The IDDSI (International Dysphasia Diet Standardization Initiative) for Easy to Chew texture indicated the following: -Do not provide fibrous foods. -Steak was to be avoided. -Make sure foods were soft enough to not regain its shape when pressed down firmly with a fork. Resident 24 admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including dementia and malnutrition. A 1/5/24 Speech Therapy Discharge Summary revealed Resident 24 required self-feeding with assistance due to dementia, and an Easy to Chew diet was recommended for the resident's safety. A 6/4/24 Nutrition: Quarterly Nutrition Data Collection indicated Resident 24 required assistance with meals. A 6/13/24 revised diet order for Resident 24 indicated she/he was to be provided Easy to Chew texture foods. A 6/25/24 revised care plan indicated Resident 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. On 11/29/22 at 10:17 AM Staff 7 (RN) stated that day was the first day she had two nurses on North Hall. On other days they were always short staffed on day and evening shifts and most weekends. Staff 7 stated she was unable to complete all of her daily assignments including: administering medications for 29 residents. Staff 7 stated she was not sure if or how often she made mistakes when passing medications due to being rushed and understaffed, and not always able to provide wound care treatments and complete charting for each shift. Staff 7 stated almost every other day she had to pass wound care treatments off to evening shift. Staff 7 stated she was not able to take breaks, administration was aware and did not provide support and told her she should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the DCSDR (Direct Care Staff Daily Reports) were complete for 12 of 18 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and visitors at risk for lack of staffing information. Findings include: A review of DCSDRs from 1/11/23 through 1/29/23 revealed the following: -1/11/23 no census documented for evening shift. -1/12/23 no census documented for evening and night shift. -1/13/23 no census documented for night shift. -1/14/23 no census documented for night shift. -1/15/23 no census documented for day and evening shift. -1/16/23 no census documented for day and evening shift. -1/17/23 no census documented for evening shift. -1/20/23 no hours documented for CNAs day shift. -1/21/23 no census documented for day and evening shift. -1/22/23 no census documented for day and evening shift. -1/24/23 no census documented for evening shift. -1/27/23 no census documented for day shift. -1/28/23 no census documented for evening shift. On 2/1/23 at 9:30 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the DCSDRs were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain adequate room temperatures and clean and sanitary conditions on 2 of 2 halls (North and South) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of a clean and comfortable environment. Findings include: 1. During interviews with residents from 11/28/22 through 12/7/22 Residents 8, 31, 49 and 159 expressed concerns related to the building being too cold. Resident Council minutes from 9/2022, 10/2022 and 11/2022 contained concerns related to the temperature in the building being too cold. The 11/2022 meeting included residents felt the facility was warmer that week because the state surveyors were in the facility. On 11/30/22 at 11:45 AM Staff 9 (Director of Maintenance) stated he checked temperatures daily at the thermostats. The building heat fluctuated because it was an old building with older heating units. The thermostats were locked but some people are taking off the locks. The windows were a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 4 of 4 sampled CNA staff (#s 14, 15, 16 and 19) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff. Findings include: On 12/6/22 at 9:50 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) provided the most recent performance reviews for Staff 14 (CNA), Staff 15 (CNA), Staff 16 (CNA) and Staff 19 (CNA). - Staff 14 was hired on 1/30/07, the provided performance review was dated 2/12/20 - Staff 15 was hired on 6/22/21, the facility was unable to provide a performance review - Staff 16 was hired on 3/10/2015, the provided performance review was dated 2/28/20 - Staff 19 was hired on 3/26/14, the provided performance review was dated 6/15/16 On 12/6/22 at 11:32 AM Staff 1 acknowledged the performance evaluations were not completed annually for Staff 14, Staff 15, Staff 16 and Staff 19.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were 34 medication administration opportunities with 4 errors. The medication error rate was 11.76%. This placed residents at risk for decreased medication efficacy and/or adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 10/2021 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate) and GERD (gastrointestinal reflux disease). Physician orders dated 10/19/21 and 12/16/21 indicated: omeprazole (to treat acid reflux) delayed release, magnesium oxide (supplement), vitamin D (supplement) and Seroquel (antipsychotic). On 12/6/22 at 10:06 AM Staff 31 (CMA) was observed to crush all medications, place them into applesauce and administer them to Resident 11. Resident 11 chewed the applesauce mixture. According to the Nursing Drug Handbook 2022 edition, omeprazole, magnesium oxide, vitamin D and Seroquel should not be crushed or chewed. On 12/06/22 at 10:30 AM Staff 31 was notified of the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly store and monitor food in 1 of 2 resident refrigerators and provide a clean exhaust hood for 1 of 1 kitchen. This placed residents at risk for an unclean preparation area and foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. On 11/30/22 at 12:02 PM the kitchen exhaust hood was observed with dark residue on the removable panels and dark sticky residue around the lip of the hood. A label with the date of 1/2022 was observed on the exhaust hood. Weekly Cleaning logs provided for 9/2022 and 11/2022 revealed no signature for the task of hood filters. No additional weekly documentation for cleaning of the hood filter during the last three months was provided. On 11/30/22 at 12:03 PM Staff 6 (Food Service Director) confirmed staff did not clean the removable panels and the exhaust hood was last cleaned when it was serviced in 1/2022. On 11/30/22 at 1:17 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the exhaust hood cleanliness was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 3 of 4 randomly selected staff members (#s 15, 16 and 19) reviewed for evidence of in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff. Findings include: On [DATE] at 9:50 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) provided the last 18 months of all completed training and in-services for Staff 15 (CNA), Staff 16 (CNA) and Staff 19 (CNA): - Staff 15 completed one in-service training, infection control - Staff 16 completed one in-service training, CPR - Staff 19 completed one in-service training, CPR On [DATE] at 11:32 AM Staff 1 acknowledged the required 12 hours of annual in-service training was not completed for Staff 15, Staff 16 and Staff 19.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#20) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for receiving care that did not promote their dignity. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 6/2022 with diagnoses including muscle weakness and chronic pain. Resident 20's care plan dated 7/6/22 indicated Resident 20 required one person assistance for ADLs, used a mechanical lift for transfers and required two staff for toileting. On 12/1/22 from 1:36 PM through 2:15 PM Resident 20's call light was observed activated. Staff were in the hall but did not answer the call light. On 11/30/22 at 11:36 AM Resident 20 stated she/he moved slow due to deficits in ROM. Resident 20 stated when staff bust in my room and try to take care of me quickly without treating me like a human, I feel humiliated and not treated with dignity. Staff treat me like an object, they are here for a paycheck. On 12/2/22 at 11:17 AM Staff 7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were included in care planning for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#20) reviewed for care planning. This placed residents at risk for not being involved in the care planning process. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 6/2022 with diagnoses including muscle weakness. On 11/30/22 at 9:33 AM Resident 20 stated she/he did not have a care conference and was not offered a copy of her/his care plan. Resident 20 stated she/he wanted to contribute to her/his care plan so her/his care would be consistent and accurate. On 12/5/22 at 12:33 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated Resident 20 did not have a welcome care conference and was not given a copy of her/his care plan.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure preferences were honored for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#30) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for lack of support for preferences. Findings include: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 4/2018 with diagnoses including visual loss and hypertension (high blood pressure). The 9/26/22 revised care plan revealed Resident 30 required one person to assist with bathing and staff were to encourage the resident to make her/his own decisions. Resident 30's 30 day ADL Task revealed showers were to be provided every Monday and Friday evening and from 10/18/22 through 11/18/22 and during this time one bed bath was received. No additional bathing was provided. On 11/28/22 at 1:16 PM Resident 30 stated staff only offered showers when she/he preferred bed baths during the day because she/he got cold in the evenings. Resident 30 confirmed she/he often refused bathing as a result. On 11/30/22 at 12:17 PM Staff 14 (CNA) stated she was aware Resident 30 preferred bed baths but did not inquire…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal and physical abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for abuse. This placed resident at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident #52 admitted to the facility in 8/2022 with diagnoses including stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), anxiety and major depressive disorder. On 8/18/22 at 10:13 AM Adult Protective Services (APS) called in a complaint to the state agency related to an incident which occurred on 8/7/22 at the facility. Staff 13 (CNA) took Resident 52 out to the smoking area. Staff 13 told Staff 16 (CNA) and Staff 48 (CNA) they were going outside and would need assistance to get back into the building. At approximately 9:45 PM the resident's ex-partner approached the smoking area from the street and began an altercation with the resident. The ex-partner approached the resident with a raised fist and was yelling, swearing and threatening the resident. The ex-partner hit the hat off the resident's head and grabbed cigarettes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report potential abuse to the state agency for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for abuse. This placed resident at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in 8/2022 with diagnoses including stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), anxiety and major depressive disorder. On 8/18/22 at 10:13 AM Adult Protective Services (APS) called in a complaint to the state agency related to an incident which occurred on 8/7/22 at the facility. Staff 13 (CNA) took Resident 52 out to the smoking area. Staff 13 told Staff 16 (CNA) and Staff 48 (CNA) they were going outside and would need assistance to get back into the building. At approximately 9:45 PM the resident's ex-partner approached the smoking area from the street and began an altercation with the resident. The ex-partner approached the resident with a raised fist and was yelling, swearing and threatening the resident. The ex-partner hit the hat off the resident's head and grabbed cigarettes from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete thorough investigations related to abuse for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 19, 43 and 52) reviewed for abuse investigations. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 8/2022 with diagnoses including dementia and frequent falls. An Incident Report dated 9/1/22 at 3:00 PM indicated a CNA assisted the resident to the floor after the resident attempted to transfer from the toilet back to the wheelchair. The resident grabbed the bathroom bar but her/his foot would not move so the resident was gently lowered to the floor since she/he could not transfer back to the wheelchair. No injuries were noted. The report included information that Resident 19 had a history of repeated falls, cognitive deficits and dementia. An Incident Report dated 9/21/22 indicated Resident 19 was complaining of pain from below the knee to the ankle on the right side. The resident was requesting an x-ray. The resident was refusing to work with therapy due to the pain.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately code assessments for skin conditions and mood and behaviors for 3 of 11 sampled residents (#s 7, 26 and 42) reviewed for nutrition, pain and ADLs. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments. Findings include: 1. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetic ulcer and diabetes. The 10/21/22 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 42 did not have a diabetic foot ulcer. The 10/19/22 Wound Evaluation indicated Resident 42 had a diabetic foot ulcer on her/his left heel. On 12/5/22 at 3:20 PM Staff 12 (Regional RN) stated Resident 42's Quarterly MDS assessment should have identified her/his diabetic foot ulcer. 2. Resident 7 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. A 7/20/22 Annual MDS indicated Resident 7 was rarely or never understood and the BIMS was completed by staff for Section C. Resident 7's 10/26/22 care plan indicated the following: -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 3 of 6 sampled residents (#s 14, 18 and 54) reviewed for accidents, behavior, and pressure injury. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1a. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 9/2019 with diagnoses including depression and adult failure to thrive. The 12/4/19 depression care plan indicated Resident 18 exhibited sad/tearful and frequently apologizing. On 3/3/22 interventions were revised and indicated staff to anticipate resident needs and provide education on effective coping strategies. The 8/22/22 Annual MDS cognitive loss dementia CAA indicated Resident 18 had mild depression, lost interest in prior activities and reported feeling bad about her/himself. The resident stated she/he had occasional thoughts of being better off dead. The 8/22/22 Annual MDS activity and mood CAA indicated Resident 18 reported depression regularly over the past 15 months. Resident 18's mood fluctuated, and she/he often apologized for 'being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plans for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 16 and 42) reviewed for care planning and hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 10/2012 with diagnoses including stroke. On 11/13/22 Resident 16 had an unwitnessed fall from the toilet. The current care plan indicated the resident required moderate assistance by one staff for toileting. No information was found in the care plan related to Resident 16's fall on 11/13/22. On 12/5/22 at 12:29 PM Staff 3 (LPN-Unit Manager) confirmed Resident 16's care plan was not revised after her/his fall. 2. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 4/2022 after hospitalization for a major infection that resulted in a below the knee amputation. An 4/14/22 Late Entry Physician Note indicated Resident 42 was re-admitted after hospitalization for staphylococcal (skin infection), blood clot and suicide attempt while in the hospital. The 5/25/22 psychosocial care plan goal indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide showers and personal hygiene for dependent residents for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 36 and 40) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including repeat falls and depression. The 7/2022 Documentation Survey Report revealed Resident 40 received three of eight scheduled baths during the month. The 7/5/22 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 40 required one person assist for personal hygiene and bathing. The current bedside care plan revealed Resident 40 was to receive bathing on Wednesday and Sunday evenings. There was no indication of shaving care needs for Resident 40. On 11/29/22 at 8:50 AM Resident 40 was observed with gray chin whiskers approximately two inches long. Resident 40 stated she/he was not able to use her/his dominate hand to shave without staff assistance and the whiskers were unbecoming. Resident 40 stated bathing support was especially bad on weekends and lack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor edema for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for oxygen. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 10/2022 with diagnoses including altered mental status and falls. A physician's order dated 1/14/22 indicated staff were to elevate Resident 16's legs throughout the day. Observations from 11/28/22 through 12/1/22 on day and evening shifts revealed Resident 16 sat in her/his wheelchair with edema to both feet, and her/his legs were not elevated. Resident 16 had her/his shoes on her/his lap and stated her/his edema had become worse. Resident 16 stated the edema made the neuropathy (pain from nerve damage) in her/his feet painful and staff were not addressing this. On 12/5/22 at 12:04 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the physician's order indicated staff were to elevate the resident's legs throughout the day. Staff 2 stated the resident did not have compression stockings, wraps for her/his feet and was not on a diuretic. Staff 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure skin and wounds were accurately and routinely assessed for healing for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 18 and 260) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for new and worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: The 2019 National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Quick Reference Guide indicated the following recommendations regarding pressure ulcer assessment: - Document the results of all wound assessments. - Assess and document physical characteristics including location, category/stage, size, tissue type(s), color, peri-wound condition, wound edges, sinus tracts, undermining, tunneling, exudate, and odor. - Select a uniform, consistent method for measuring wound length, width, depth or wound area to facilitate meaningful comparisons of wound measurements across time. - Ensure pressure ulcers are correctly differentiated from other skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate foot care for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 26, 42 and 47) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for increased foot problems. Findings include: 1. Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including diabetes and stroke. On 11/29/22 at 10:24 AM Witness 5 (Emergency Contact) stated she visited the resident regularly. Witness 5 said initially the facility took good care of the resident and kept her/him clean and groomed. However, the last few times she was in the facility the resident was dirty and soiled. The staff were not taking care of the resident's feet or toenails. The resident's feet had very flaky skin and her/his toenails were not trimmed. The resident had skin tears on her/his shins and ankles and it looked like the toe nails may have torn open the skin. On 12/1/11 at 12:00 PM an observation of Resident 47's feet was conducted. The resident had multiple scabs on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record reviewed it was determined the facility failed to provide ROM services for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 23, 43 and 40) reviewed for ROM. This placed residents at risk for decreased ROM. Finding include: 1. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 4/2019 with diagnoses including stroke and muscle weakness. The 6/3/20 ADL care plan indicated staff were to provide ROM one to five times a week to lower upper extremities, fingers, wrist, elbow and shoulder. Staff were to provide ROM one to two times a week to lower leg extremities. The Restorative Nursing Program Plan was last revised 9/14/20. An 10/19/22 Restorative Nursing Communication Tool revealed Resident 43 was to receive ROM services one to four times each week to increase lower extremity strength and coordination. The 11/2022 Restorative Record indicated Resident 23 was unable to receive ROM two days of the month. No additional documentation was provided. The 12/1/22 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 23 had upper and lower extremity impairment and the resident did not receive ROM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions and facility smoking policies were followed, and investigations were thorough for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 16, 40 and 54) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injuries. Finding include: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 10/2012 with diagnoses including stroke and difficulty walking. Review of the 3/14/20 care plan indicated the resident was at risk for falls due to stroke with right sided deficits, deconditioning, gait and balance problems, weakness, pain and history of falls. The resident had potential for falls related to cognitive loss, altered safety awareness and history of falls. The interventions were to anticipate and meet the resident's needs, assist with ADLs and place the call light button within reach. Review of a 11/13/22 fall incident report indicated the resident was heard screaming and staff ran into her/his room to find the resident fell off of the toilet hitting the right side of her/his head on a transfer pole and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 162 was admitted to the facility in 6/2022 with diagnoses including chronic heart failure, kidney disease and COVID-19. On [DATE] at 9:49 AM a Communication with Physician included the following: Situation: The resident's oxygen (O2) saturation (sat) was 69 percent on two liters via nasal cannula. Background: The resident with active COVID-19. Assessment (RN)/Appearance (LPN): Resident was lying flat and coughing when O2 sat was 69%. This LN raised head up to 90 degrees and increased O2 to 3L. O2 sat increased to 72%. O2 was then increased to 4L and resident's O2 sat increased to 80%. O2 was then increased to 5L and resident began to sat between 93-95%. Resident's lungs continue to be congested with adventitious lung sounds noted in all lobes. Resident has no orders for medications to assist with breathing. On [DATE] at 2:59 PM an Orders Administration Note indicated: Oxygen at two liters per minute continuously via nasal cannula. Resident increased to five liters per minute related to oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to manage residents' pain for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#43) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for unmanaged pain. Findings include: Resident 43 was admitted to the facility in 6/2022 with diagnoses including three Stage 4 pressure ulcers (full tissue loss) chronic pain and muscle weakness. The 6/23/22 Admission/readmission Skin Assessment indicated Resident 43 admitted from the hospital with three open area/wounds on her/his buttocks. The wounds were dry, intact, and bandages were changed by the wound nurse at the hospital. The resident complained her/his pain was a 7/10 and stated the Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) was ineffective. The 6/23/22 care plan indicated Resident 43 had sacral pain that was not controlled with current pain medications. A 6/25/22 Physician Note indicated Resident 43 had pelvic pain. Pain medication during wound care was not enough and there was an absolute need for pain clinic referral. The 6/29/22 admission MDS indicated Resident 43 was alert and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was not given psychotropic medications without an appropriate diagnoses and adequate monitoring for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#42) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident 42 admitted to the facility in 10/2019 with diagnoses including depression. A 5/23/22 physician's order indicated staff were to administer trazodone (antidepressant medication) PRN for insomnia. A 9/13/22 Pharmacy Consultation note indicated Resident 42's trazodone PRN had no stop date. A 9/15/22 Pharmacy note indicated Resident 42 required PRN trazodone nightly to promote quality of life and it was PRN so that she/he may determine when she/he wanted to retire to bed. A 11/7/22 Pharmacy Consultation note repeated a 10/16/22 recommendation to discontinue the order for PRN trazodone with no stop date. On 11/16/22 the Physician indicated Resident 42 had trouble sleeping due to anxiety and would reassess the need for trazodone. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an effective system for resident food preferences for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#40) reviewed for food . This placed residents at risk for meal prefererences not being honored. Findings include: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including repeat falls and depression. A 7/12/22 Quarterly Nutrition Review revealed Resident 40's goal for weight maintenance with gradual weight reduction was acceptable. Resident 40's clinical record revealed no indication of food preferences. The 10/7/22 Resident Council Minutes revealed resident concerns related to food preferences that were not followed and lack of menu variety. On 11/29/22 at 9:22 AM Resident 40 stated she/he spoke to someone on admission related to her meal preferences but there was no follow through after the initial conversation. Resident 40 indicated she/he was concerned about healthy food alternatives and limited information was available regarding menu alternatives. On 11/30/22 at 11:08 AM and 12:49…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$3,145 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRESTON, FORREST | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/24/2015 |
| BUTNER, NANCY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/16/2018 |
| CURTIS, LEANN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/28/2025 |
| GIBBINS, DUSTIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/09/2024 |
| CROSS, CINDY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 10/01/2017 |
| HENRY, TERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/27/2017 |
| THURMOND, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/27/2017 |
| LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/24/2015 |
| FLETCHER, TODD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2021 |
| LAY, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/24/2017 |
| PRESTON, AUBREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/27/2024 |
| SWANKER, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2022 |
| VELLODY, NITA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| ZIEGLER, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/18/2001 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385120. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.