No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Life Care Center of McMinnville

1309 NE 27th Street, McMinnville, OR 97128 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (503) 472-4678 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (503) 472-4678 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jul 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Mariner0.6 mi
207 NE 19th St Ste 302 · (503) 434-2757 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
225 NE 3rd St · (503) 472-2146 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1351 NE Highway 99W · (503) 472-8118 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2495 NE Evans St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2631 NE McDonald Ln · (503) 472-8924

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.1%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.6%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.8%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.9%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.7%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.3%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.6%81.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%21.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.8%16.1%12.0%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
83.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 83.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.6%CMS range 58.7–72.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.6–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge83.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge84.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge76.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.0–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.44
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
56.8%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 60.2 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.44 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.547 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.65 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents received medications timely for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of medication. Findings include: 1. The 2/19/26 Resident Council Minutes indicated nurses were rushing during medication pass. 2. Resident 59 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including unspecified convulsions and dementia. The 3/2/26 physician orders indicated Resident 59 was to receive the following medications:-acetaminophen three times daily-cyanocobalamin (supplement) once daily-sennosides-docusate sodium (bowel medication) once daily-carvedilol (blood pressure medication) twice daily-duloxetine (antidepressant medication) once daily-levetiracetam (anti convulsant medication) once daily -aspirin once daily-amlodipine (blood pressure medication) once daily-cholecalciferol (supplement) once dailyOn 3/9/26 at 11:55 AM Staff 4 (LPN) stated resident's morning medications were administered late almost every day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#53) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for medication errors. Findings include:Resident 53 admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including Parkinson's and orthostatic hypotension (a sudden drop in blood pressure upon sitting or standing). The 2/26/26 admission MDS revealed a BIMS of 12 indicating a moderate cognitive impairment, but no delirium, inattention, or disorganized thinking. Resident 53 was assessed to be at risk for falls and required assistance with mobility and ADLs. The 2/26/26 Care Plan indicated Resident 53 was at risk for rehospitalization due to Parkinson's and falls. A 2/26/26 Physician Order revealed a prescription for 1.5 tablets of Carbidopa-Levodopa (a medication used to treat Parkinson's Disease) 25-200 MG every 3 hours. The facility scheduled this medication to be given at 2:00 AM, 5:00 AM, 8:00 AM, 11:00 AM, 2:00 PM, 5:00 PM, 8:00 PM, and 11:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication storage temperatures were logged and maintained, and failed to ensure proper labeling of biologicals for 1 of 1 medication room and 1 of 3 treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for reduced efficacy of medication. Findings include:1. On 3/9/26 at 9:02 AM an open Humalin N insulin pen was observed in the C hall treatment cart with no open date.On 3/9/26 at 9:02 AM Staff 3 (LPN) acknowledged the insulin pen was open and not labeled with an open date.On 3/12/26 8:15 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the expectation was for insulin pens to be labeled with open dates. 2. On 3/11/26 at 10:20 AM two open, undated vials of Tuberculin (used for the testing in the diagnosis of Tuberculosis) were observed in the medication room refrigerator. The manufacturer's instructions indicated to discard the medication 30 days after opening.On 3/11/26 at 10:20 AM Staff 3 (LPN) acknowledged the two vials of Tuberculin were open and not labeled with open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food items stored in unit refrigerators were not expired and refrigerator temperatures were monitored for 2 of 2 unit refrigerators reviewed for food storage. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. On 3/9/26 at 8:19 AM the ADL kitchen refrigerator was observed and revealed the following:-The temperature log for 2026 was on the outside of the refrigerator door and had one temperature documented for 1/14/26, but no other temperatures for January, February, and March were documented.-An individual to go container dated 2/22/26.-A snack pack with moldy food inside with a use by 2/25/26 date printed on it. -A bagged salad with a use by date of 2/25/26.-A half-gallon container of milk with a best by 2/4/26 date.-Two kefir containers, one with a best by date of 1/16/26, and the second with a best by date of 12/26/25.On 3/9/26 at 11:07 AM Staff 12 (Maintenance Director) observed the refrigerator in the ADL room and confirmed the expired contents and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 85 and 86) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and unmet care needs. Findings include:1. Resident 85 was admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including malnutrition, leg fracture, and history of falls. The 2/9/26 Care Plan indicated Resident 85 was at risk for falls and her/his call light needed to be within reach. The 2/13/26 admission MDS revealed Resident 85 had a history of falls, required assistance with mobility, and had a BIMS score of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 3/9/26 at 8:57 AM Resident 85's call light was located behind her/him, attached to the backside of her/his pillow and out of reach.On 3/9/26 at 1:31 PM Resident 85's call light was attached to the outside of the bed on the left side, but underneath the resident's blanket and out of her/his line of sight. The resident was observed unsuccessfully attempting to locate the call light. On 3/10/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess functional mobility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#68) reviewed for positioning and mobility. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 68 admitted to the facility in 5/2025 with left side hemiparesis (paralysis of half of the body).A 5/19/25 hospital History and Physical revealed Resident 68 had left side hemiparesis.A 5/18/25 progress note revealed Resident 68's left side was very flaccid and she/he had no strength or independent movement to the leg or arm.A 5/23/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 68 did not have functional limitation in range of motion in her/his upper extremities. On 3/8/26 at 11:05 AM Resident 68 was observed with her/his left arm bent at 90 degrees and stated as a result of a stroke she/he could not move it. On 3/11/26 at 1:12 PM Staff 7 (RN MDS Coordinator) stated on admission to the facility Resident 68 had limited ROM on her/his left upper extremity and the admission MDS was coded inaccurately.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide personal hygiene services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#48) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet hygiene needs. Findings include:Resident 48 was admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including stroke and traumatic brain injury.The 2/22/26 Care Plan indicated Resident 48 required assistance with ADLs.The 3/3/26 admission MDS for Resident 48 revealed a BIMS score of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had one-sided impairment for upper extremity and required substantial to maximum assistance with personal hygiene activities. The ADL Personal Hygiene task, which included hand hygiene, was documented as completed with extensive assistance on 3/8/26, and total dependence on 3/9/26, 3/10/26, and 3/11/26.The ADL Bathing task revealed Resident 48 received a shower on 3/10/26 and was totally dependent. Resident 48 was observed to have soiled fingernails with a brown substance underneath all the fingernails on her/his right hand on 3/8/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide pain management for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#86) reviewed for pain management. This placed residents at risk for unmanaged pain. Findings include:Resident 86 admitted to the facility in 3/2026 with diagnoses including stroke and a history of falls. The 3/6/26 Care Plan revealed a goal for Resident 86 to express pain relief, and she/he was to receive pain medication as ordered. Nursing notes from 3/7/26, 3/8/26, and 3/10/26 indicated Resident 86 was alert, oriented, and able to make her/his needs known. Physician orders revealed an order on 3/6/26 for acetaminophen 500 mg to be given every six hours as needed for pain, and an order on 3/9/26 for use of a warm compress (washcloth) to be used PRN for pain. The 3/2026 Treatment Administration Record showed documented pain ratings of zero for 3/8/26, 3/9/26, 3/10/26, and 3/11/26, and there were no documented uses of the warm compress for pain relief from 3/9/26 through 3/11/26. The 3/2026 Medication Administration Record showed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a thorough discharge summary for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 3, 6, and 7) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for lack of information related to discharge. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with a diagnosis of femur fracture. A 7/14/25 Discharge Summary Information assessment revealed Resident 3 was to discharge to her/his home with home health services. The Discharge Summary Information did not include information related to what company was to provide home health services to Resident 3, post discharge instructions, or include a recapitulation of Resident 3's stay. On 12/10/25 at 12:33 PM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed Resident 3's Discharge Summary Information assessment was not completed thoroughly. 2. Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 11/2025 with a diagnosis of respiratory failure.A 12/2/25 Discharge Summary Information assessment revealed Resident 6 was to discharge to her/his home. The Discharge Summary Information assessment did not include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from misappropriation of property for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 101 and 102) reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. This placed residents at risk for loss of property. Findings include: 1. Resident 101 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025, with diagnoses including difficulty walking and fracture of the right arm. On 7/29/25 at 9:23 AM, Staff 1 (Administrator) stated on 7/14/25, two Police Officers came to the facility and showed Staff 1 a picture, which she identified as Staff 4 (CMA/CNA), an employee of the facility. The Officers informed Staff 1 that Resident 101 and Resident 102 had their debit/credit cards stolen, and Staff 4 was under investigation. Staff 1 stated the police called her on 7/15/25 and informed her they had taken Staff 4 into custody and lodged her at the County jail. The officers also told Staff 1 that Staff 4 had admitted to taking and using the residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess a skin wound for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for worsening wounds. Findings include: Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 11/2024, with diagnoses including malnutrition and colostomy. The 11/19/24 Hospital History and Physical indicated Resident 2's abdominal ostomy site had surrounding erythema (redness) and one spot of skin breakdown. The 11/20/24 admission Skin Assessment indicated no abdominal wounds. Resident 2's Progress Notes dated 11/22/24 through 11/24/24 and 11/26/24 through 12/2/24 described an abdominal ostomy with constant drainage, and the surrounding skin as red and inflamed. A 12/6/24 Progress Note indicated Resident 2's colostomy bag would not stay in place, her/his abdominal skin was excoriated, blistered, tender to touch and caused irretractable pain due to the constant colostomy drainage. Resident 2's skin was inflamed mid abdomen to the perineum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a physician supervised the resident's medical care and evaluated the effectiveness of wound care treatments for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for increased pain, worsening wounds and hospitalization. Findings include: Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 11/2024, with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), malnutrition and colostomy. The 11/19/24 Hospital History and Physical indicated Resident 2's abdominal ostomy site had surrounding erythema (redness) and one spot of skin breakdown. Resident 2's 11/20/24 and 11/27/24 Ostomy and Skin Care Plans revealed she/he had a colostomy and was at risk for a decline in skin integrity. Staff were to keep the skin clean, dry and protected from the ostomy drainage, and to clean and apply moisture barrier to the skin after each leaking episode. The 11/21/24 Physician Note revealed Resident 2 had a colostomy and indicated all chronic conditions were relatively stable. The note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were six errors in 26 opportunities resulting in a 23% medication error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects from medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 152 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including heart failure, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and fibromyalgia. a. The 11/1/24 physician order indicated Resident 152 was to receive duloxetine (antidepressant medication) delayed release 60 mg once daily for chronic pain. On 11/6/24 at 9:01 AM Staff 5 (Agency RN) was observed to prepare morning medications for Resident 152. Staff 5 prepared duloxetine 30 mg in the medication cup and continued to the next medication. The State Surveyor stopped Staff 5 and asked her to review the order since the prepared medication did not match the order. Staff 5 acknowledged she prepared duloxetine 30 mg instead of the ordered duloxetine 60 mg. Staff 5 then prepared the correct dose of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident received assistance with fingernail care for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#46) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 46 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including stroke and left sided hemiparesis (paralysis to one side of the body). The 8/7/24 care plan indicated Resident 46 had left sided weakness and required assistance with ADL care. The 10/2024 TAR indicated Resident 46 received nail care on 10/31/24. On 11/4/24 at 12:43 PM Resident 46 was observed to have long fingernails. Resident 46 stated she/he requested to have her/his nails trimmed but staff did not provide nail care. On 11/6/24 at 2:10 PM Staff 7 (CNA) stated nail care was completed or offered for all residents on shower days. Staff 7 acknowledged Resident 46 was dependent on staff for nail care and her/his fingernails were long. On 11/6/24 at 2:15 PM Staff 2 (DNS) observed Resident 46's fingernails and acknowledged her/his fingernails…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a restorative program to prevent decline in range of motion for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#46) reviewed for RA. This placed residents at risk for physical decline. Findings include: Resident 46 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including stroke and left sided hemiparesis (paralysis to one side of the body). The 8/7/24 care plan indicated Resident 46 had left sided weakness, impaired mobility and required assistance with ADL care. The 9/23/24 Physical and Occupational Therapy Discharge Summaries indicated Resident 46 made consistent progress throughout the plan of treatment and responded positively to techniques to stimulate functional performance and enhance safety to prevent further decline. Notes further indicated she/he had upper extremity hemiparesis which did not improve. The restorative program was, not indicated at this time. On 11/4/24 at 12:43 PM Resident 46 was observed to have her/his hand to be closed into a fist and stated she/he did not receive range of motion exercises…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment for a resident receiving dialysis including monitoring of the dialysis site and communication with the dialysis provider for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#30) reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: Resident 30 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including renal dialysis. a. The facility's Hemodialysis Offsite Policy, revised in 2023, indicated staff were to initiate the Pre/Post Dialysis Communication Form that was to be sent to the dialysis clinic with the resident. The policy further indicated upon return from dialysis the Pre/Post Dialysis Communication Form was to be completed. The 11/20/23 care plan indicated Resident 30 received dialysis three days a week on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Review of the Pre/Post Dialysis Communication Form from 7/2024 through 10/2024 revealed the following: - 7/2024 five instances when the dialysis forms were not completed. - 8/2024 10 instances when the dialysis forms were not completed. - 9/2024 10 instances when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were considered for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 14 and 28) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medication. Findings include: 1. Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including delusional disorder. Resident 14's 9/26/24 pharmacy recommendation indicated the following: -The resident received haloperidol (antipsychotic medication) 2.5 mg in the morning and 5 mg at bedtime for psychosis related to metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction) and hallucinations. -Nursing assessments indicated no episodes of delusions or hallucinations in the last three months. -Please attempt a gradual dose reduction of haloperidol to 5 mg at bedtime. - The pharmacy recommendation was signed by the physician on 9/26/24 and indicated the recommendations were accepted and to be implemented as written. The pharmacy recommendation was not noted by Staff 2 (DNS) until 10/8/24 (13 days later). On 11/7/24 at 1:23 PM Staff 2 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly respond for 2 of 3 months of Resident Council minutes reviewed. This placed residents at risk for unresolved quality of life and care issues. Findings include: The facility's revised 9/27/23 Resident Council policy stated, the facility must act promptly upon the recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility. The Activities Director will facilitate follow-up on all suggestions and ideas presented at the council meeting and will report results at the next meeting. Each Department Director will be responsible for filling out a comment form prior to the next meeting. Resident Council Minutes were reviewed from 7/2024 through 9/2024 and indicated the following residents' concerns: *7/10/24: Do not close doors without permission, make sure call lights are within reach, beds have been squeaking, can people be informed? There was no follow up after the 7/10/24 Resident Council meeting regarding the residents' concerns and recommendations. *8/7/24: Cooler for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for sexual abuse. This placed residents at risk for sexual abuse. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including anxiety and adult failure to thrive. A 8/18/23 a Progress Note revealed Resident 1 was sent to the hospital due to a change of condition. On 1/3/24 at 3:27 PM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated on 9/1/23 she was informed by a hospital social worker, Resident 1 reported she did not want to return to the facility from the hospital because they, indicating staff, were having sex with [her/him]. On 1/4/24 at 1:46 PM Staff 4 (Social Service Director) stated she contacted Witness 2 (Family Member) around Christmas time because Resident 1 had a box of items left at the facility. Witness 2 refused to step foot into the facility, claiming Resident 1 was raped every day at the facility. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for allegations of sexual abuse. This placed residents at risk for further sexual abuse. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including anxiety and adult failure to thrive. A 8/18/23 a Progress Note revealed Resident 1 was sent to the hospital due to a change of condition. On 1/3/24 at 3:27 PM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated on 9/1/23 she was informed by a social worker that Resident 1 reported she/he did not want to return to the facility from the hospital because they, indicating staff, were having sex with [her/him]. On 1/4/24 at 1:46 PM Staff 4 (Social Service Director) stated she contacted Witness 2 (Family Member) around Christmas time because Resident 1 had a box of items left at the facility. Witness 2 refused to step foot into the facility, claiming Resident 1 was raped every day at the facility. Staff 4 stated Witness 2 was very mad and angry about the situation. Staff 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide care to prevent a pressure ulcer and accurately assess a pressure ulcer injury for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate wound assessments and worsening of wounds. Findings include: CMS Appendix PP defined an Unstageable Pressure Ulcer: Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss. Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough (yellow/white material in the wound bed) or eschar (a dry, dark scab or falling away of dead skin). Stable eschar (i.e. dry, adherent, intact without erythema or fluctuance) should only be removed after careful clinical consideration and consultation with the resident's physician, or nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or clinical nurse specialist if allowable under state licensure laws. If the slough or eschar is removed, a Stage 3 or Stage 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff wore gloves when assessing a wound for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed resident at risk for infections. Findings include: Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with diagnoses including left leg fracture, peripheral vascular disease, and right trans-metatarsal amputation (removal of the toes). On 1/3/24 at 11:17 AM Witness 5 (ALF [from an Assisted Living Facility]-LPN) stated she completed a skin assessment at the facility on 10/6/23 for Resident 3 to return to her/his ALF. Witness 5 stated she removed the sock from the left heel and the resident's left heel had an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure wound with eschar (dry, dark scab or falling away of dead skin), dead tissue and was approximately half a dollar coin sized. Witness 5 stated she reported this to Staff 3 (LPN-Resident Care Manager) and Staff 5 (LPN). Staff 3 entered the room to look at the wound and proceeded to pick up the resident's left foot without gloves and started to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure multi-dose insulin vials were labeled with an open date for 2 of 7 residents (#s 5 and 7) reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for expired medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2/2020 with diagnoses including diabetes and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Resident 5's 6/10/23 physician's order indicated: -NovoLog (short acting insulin) Pen-inject six units subcutaneously (under the skin) two times a day for diabetes. -Lantus (long acting insulin) multi-use vial-inject 25 units subcutaneously in the morning related to diabetes. On 7/12/23 at 7:51 AM Staff 12 (LPN) administered two doses of insulin to Resident 5. The Novolog Pen and the Lantus multi dose vial did not indicate an opened on date on the pen or vial. On 7/12/23 at 9:58 AM Staff 12 stated she was unsure what the process was for medications without an open date on the bottle. Staff 12 acknowledged the medication could be expired. On 7/12/23 at 11:27 AM Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to give notification of financial responsibilities for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#37) reviewed for Medicare notification of non-coverage. This placed residents at risk for unknown financial liabilities. Findings include: Resident 37 admitted to the facility with Medicare Part A services on 4/10/23 for physical and occupational therapy. On 5/16/23 a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was provided for Medicare A discharge on [DATE]. According to the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification document provided by the facility, the resident remained in the facility after 5/18/23, pending Medicaid coverage approval. On 7/11/23 at 10:53 AM Staff 3 (Social Service Director) acknowledged Resident 37 was not provided appropriate notice to outline the resident's financial responsibilities.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to the resident's umbilical hernia for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#29) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and rehospitalization. Findings include: Resident 29 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver, anemia (low red blood cells), and umbilical hernia. A Progress Note dated 5/21/23 at 3:00 PM indicated Resident 29 asked the nurse to assess her/his hernia due to a change in appearance, experiencing nausea, and vomiting and pain with movement. The resident was sent to the emergency room via ambulance and had an emergent surgical repair of the hernia. A Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated Resident 29 had a longstanding history of an umbilical hernia. Resident 29's 4/22/23 Care Plan did not include any information regarding her/his hernia. On 7/13/23 at 12:04 PM Staff 4 (LPN) confirmed Resident 29's Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise the resident's care plan related to severe chronic anemia for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#29) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and rehospitalization. Findings include: Resident 29 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver, anemia (low red blood cells), and umbilical hernia. On 3/21/23 at 9:10 AM Resident 29's lab values revealed she/he had a critically low hemoglobin and hematocrit (red blood cell values). The resident was sent to the hospital and required a blood transfusion. Resident 29's Hospital Patient Discharge Report dated 3/22/23 indicated she/he was diagnosed with severe iron deficiency. On 3/23/23 Resident 29 returned to the facility and was started on the following medications: - Folic acid (supplement for red blood cell formation) - Ferrous Sulfate (Iron supplement) On 4/15/23 a Physician's Progress Note indicated Resident 29 would be referred to hematology for severe chronic anemia. The resident had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer bowel medications according to physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#17) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for complications of constipation. Findings include: Review of the facility Bowel Care list revealed the following bowel protocol: -If no BM (bowel movement) after day three staff would administer MOM (Milk of Magnesia) a laxative. -If no BM after MOM evening staff would administer a suppository. -If no BM after the suppository night shift staff would administer an enema. -If no results staff were to notify the physician. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including diabetes and chronic pain syndrome. Resident 17's BM records from 6/13/23 through 7/12/23 indicated the resident did not have a BM on the following dates: - 6/13/23 through 6/16/23 (four days) - 6/27/23 through 7/4/23 (seven days) No evidence was found in the resident's clinical record to indicate the bowel protocol was initiated. On 7/12/23 at 1:46 PM Staff 6 (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident who was a trauma survivor received trauma-informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#2) reviewed for behavioral needs. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and a decrease in their quality of life. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility 3/2023 with diagnoses including: PTSD (Post traumatic stress disorder). Resident 2's 3/17/23 Care Plan did not reveal any information regarding the resident's PTSD. A 4/13/23 Trauma Informed Care worksheet completed by Staff 3 (Social Service Director) revealed Resident 2 experienced physical assault. Resident 2 answered 'Extremely' to the following questions: -Felt upset when something reminded her/him of the stressful event; -Avoiding memories, thoughts, or feelings related to the stressful experience; -Having strong negative feelings such as fear, horror, anger, guilt, or shame; -Feeling jumpy or easily startled. On 7/10/23 at 9:40 AM Resident 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacy reviews were completed and recommendations were addressed by the physician for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s13 and 20) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for inappropriately managed medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 13 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 13's current medications reviewed on 7/10/23 revealed the resident was administered Seroquel (antipsychotic) 25 mg each day at bedtime. A 6/23/23 Omnicare Consultation report, pharmacist review of medications, indicated Resident 13's antipsychotic required a specific diagnosis/indication requiring treatment that was based upon an assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals. A list of the symptoms or target behaviors included their impact on the resident and documentation that other medications were considered, and that individualized nonpharmacological interventions were in place. In addition, the report indicated ongoing monitoring should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was appropriate evaluation and monitoring of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled resident (#13) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including dementia. A review of Resident 13's clinical record revealed the resident had orders for the following psychotropic medications: - Bupropion (Anti-depressant) - Quetiapine (Antipsychotic) - Duloxetine (Mood stabilizer) A 7/10/23 review of Resident 13's clinical record indicated no monitoring of indications for use were in place for the identified psychotropic medications. On 7/12/23 at 9:53 AM Staff 6 (LPN) confirmed there was no monitoring in place for behavioral symptoms or indications for use for any of Resident 13's psychotropic medications. On 7/12/23 at 10:16 AM Staff 18 (CNA) confirmed staff did not document any of Resident 13's behaviors. On 7/12/23 at 10:51 AM staff 4 (LPN/Resident Care Manager)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 5, 7 and 14) during medication administration. There were five errors in 26 opportunities resulting in a 19.23% error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include. 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2/2020 with diagnoses including diabetes and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). Resident 5's 6/26/23 physician's order indicated: -NovoLog (short acting insulin) Pen- inject 6 units subcutaneously (under the skin) two times a day for diabetes. -Lantus (long acting insulin) multi-use vial inject 25 units subcutaneously in the morning related to diabetes. On 7/12/23 at 7:51 AM Staff 12 (LPN) was observed to administer two doses of insulin to Resident 5. The Novolog Pen and the Lantus multi dose vial did not indicate an open date on the pen or vial. On 7/12/23 at 9:58 AM Staff 12 stated she was unsure what the process was for medications without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain dental services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#29) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for difficulty eating. Findings include: Resident 29 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver. Resident 29's 4/7/23 Annual Dental CAA indicated the resident was at risk for dental problems due to missing teeth, possible dental cavities, and resident report of missing dental crowns. Resident 29's dental care plan initiated on 4/12/22 included an intervention to coordinate arrangements for dental services as needed. On 7/10/23 at 10:06 AM Resident 29 stated it hurt when biting into hard food. The resident did not recall having been offered dental services since coming to the facility and wanted to be seen by a dentist. On 7/13/23 at 8:30 AM Staff 2 (DNS) was requested to provide any additional information which may have indicated Resident 29 was offered or received dental services and none was provided. On 7/13/23 at 1:30 PM Staff 2 verified Resident 29 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Garden Terrace At Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Hammond-Whiting Care CenterWhiting, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of AndoverAndover, KS 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Cape GirardeauCape Girardeau, MO 1 of 5Life Care Center Of GrayGray, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of HixsonHixson, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Mount VernonMount Vernon, WA 1 of 5Life Care Center Of RenoReno, NV 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Sierra VistaSierra Vista, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center Of The WillowsValparaiso, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of TucsonTucson, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Life Care Center of ElkhornElkhorn, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of Hilton HeadHilton Head Island, SC 1 of 5Life Care Center of OmahaOmaha, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of PlainwellPlainwell, MI 1 of 5Life Care Ctr Of LawrencevilleLawrenceville, GA 1 of 5Rensselaer Care CenterRensselaer, IN 2 of 5Canon Lodge Care CenterCanon City, CO 2 of 5Darcy Hall Of Life CareWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Desert Cove Nursing CenterChandler, AZ 2 of 5Evergreen Nursing HomeAlamosa, CO 2 of 5Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of HoustonHouston, TX 2 of 5Hallmark ManorFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Lane House, TheCrawfordsville, IN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Altamonte SpringsAltamonte Springs, FL 2 of 5Life Care Center Of AthensAthens, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BridgetonBridgeton, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BrookfieldBrookfield, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ColumbiaColumbia, SC 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Federal WayFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of GrandviewGrandview, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of KirklandKirkland, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Merrimack ValleyBillerica, MA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Morgan CountyWartburg, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of PuyallupPuyallup, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Red BankChattanooga, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of South Las VegasLas Vegas, NV

Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DEVELOPERS INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/14/1996
PRESTON, FORRESTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2014
BUTNER, NANCYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/16/2018
CURTIS, LEANNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/17/2026
GALBRAITH, LAURAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/18/2024
CROSS, CINDYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/1996
FLETCHER, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/02/2020
HENRY, TERRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/16/1999
LAY, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/09/2018
SWANKER, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2011
THURMOND, JOANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/22/2000
ZIEGLER, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/16/1999
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2025
MCMINNVILLE MEDICAL INVESTORS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2014
PRESTON, AUBREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024
RUDEN, NATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
2016 PORTFOLIO MASTER LEASE, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 11%Other / private 27%

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$509per resident / day
operating cost
$15,459per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$549per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385171. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next