Life Care Center Of Centerville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 67.7 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 64 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to State Agency, Ombudsman, Adult Protective Services, and Law Enforcement for 4 of 4 (Resident #48, #54, #58, and #59) sampled residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse-Protection of Residents dated 6/17/2024, revealed The facility will ensure that all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm during and after the investigation .methods to ensure the protection of residents during an investigation may include but not limited to Responding immediately to protect the alleged victim and integrity of the investigation .Examining the alleged victim for any sign of injury, including a physical examination or psychosocial assessment if needed .Immediate notification of the alleged victim's practitioner and the family or responsible party Removal of access by the alleged perpetrator to the alleged victim…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that all alleged violations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 4 of 4 (Resident #48, #54, #58, and #59) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse-Protection of Residents reviewed 6/17/2024, revealed The facility will ensure that all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm during and after the investigation .methods to ensure the protection of residents during an investigation may include but not limited to Responding immediately to protect the alleged victim and integrity of the investigation Examining the alleged victim for any sign of injury, including a physical examination or psychosocial assessment if needed Immediate notification of the alleged victim's practitioner and the family or responsible party Removal of access by the alleged perpetrator to the alleged victim and that ongoing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored when opened and undated medications were found in 1 of 6 medication storage areas (West Hall #1 Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals dated 8/7/2023, revealed .Facility should ensure that medications and biologicals are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts .Once any medication or biological package is opened .Facility should staff should record date opened on the primary medication container [vial, bottle, inhaler] .Facility should ensure that the medications and biologicals for each resident are stored in the containers in which they were originally received . Observation of the [NAME] Hall #1 Medication Cart on 9/11/2024 at 10:02 AM, revealed the following medications opened, unlabeled and undated medications loose in the medication cart drawer. a. ProAir inhaler b. Albuterol Sulfate inhaler During an interview on 9/11/2024 at 10:02 AM, Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2020-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by a dirty meat slicer, wet nesting of trays, dirty cups, dirty skillets and a plastic container of food sitting on the floor in the kitchen. The facility had a census of 71, with 71 of those residents receiving a meal tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. The facility's .Food and Nutrition Services Manual, revised 1/11/2017 documented, .associates are trained in the .cleaning and sanitation of all equipment and utensils .All items are air dried before storing . 2. Observation in the Kitchen on 2/3/2020 at 9:15 AM, showed a dirty meat slicer on the kitchen counter. During an interview on 2/3/2020 at 9:17 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was asked when should the meat slicer be cleaned. The CDM stated, .after use . The CDM was asked was the meat slicer clean. The CDM stated, No. Observation in the Kitchen on 2/4/2020 at 11:25 AM, showed 11 wet trays stacked together. During an interview on 2/4/2020 at 11:28 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician when a weight loss occurred for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #46) reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: Review of the facility policy's titled, Changes in Resident's Condition or Status, dated 4/15/2019, showed .This facility will notify the .primary care provider .consult with the resident physician .Notification of Changes .A significant change in resident's physical .status . Review of the medical record, showed Resident #66 had a diagnoses of Dementia, Anemia, Vitamin D Deficiency, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Muscle Weakness. Review of the Care Plan dated 1/3/2020, showed Resident #46 had a nutritional problem with an intervention of, .Observe for and report to MD [Medical Doctor] .3lbs [3 pounds] in 1 week . Review of the Weights and Vital Summary dated 2/5/2020, showed the following weights for Resident #46: 1/7/2020 171.1 lbs, 1/8/2020 166 lbs. 1/28/2020 164 lbs. Review of the medical record, showed there was no documentation that the physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube use and dialysis for 2 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #18 and #21) reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record, showed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia and Dysphagia. Review of the significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] and the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #18 was cognitively impaired. A feeding tube, nasogastric, or abdominal PEG tube was not checked as being present. The Physician's Orders dated 1/22/2020 showed, .Enteral Feed Order four times a day Give 250 cc [cubic centimeters] Free H2O [water] QID [4 times per day] via PEG tube During an interview conducted on 2/5/2020 at 4:44 PM, the MDS Nurse confirmed Resident #18 had a PEG tube and should have been marked as yes on both of the MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan for nutritional supplements for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #46) reviewed for weight loss and nutrition. The findings include: Review of the medical record, showed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Anemia, Vitamin D Deficiency, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Muscle Weakness. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 1/30/2020, showed an order to administer, .House Supplement, Frozen in the afternoon, Give 4 oz. [ounces]. Document % [percent] taken/ With lunch . Review of the Care Plan dated 1/3/2020, showed Resident #46 had a nutritional problem with an intervention of, .Provide and serve diet as ordered, Regular texture with thin consistency . There was no documentation that the Care Plan was updated to include the new house supplement order. During an interview on 2/5/2020 at 12:04 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that the care plan was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess and monitor weights for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #46) reviewed for nutrition. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight and Heights, dated 11/18/2019, showed .All residents are weighed within 24 hours of admission and weekly for 4 weeks . Review of the facility's policy titled, Claxton Dietetic Solutions, dated 10/10/2018, showed, .New Admits must be charted on by day 14 of admission .What your dietary manager should be providing you at each visit .RD [Registered Dietitian] referral list with new admits . Review of the facility's policy titled, Changes in Resident's Condition or Status, dated 4/15/2019, showed, .This facility will notify the .primary care provider .consult with the residents physician .Notification of Changes .A significant change in resident's physical .status . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident at Risk (RAR) Meeting, dated 1/22/2019, showed, .This…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0801 — isolated
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility's Registered Dietician (RD) failed to do an admission dietary assessment for Resident #46. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Claxton Dietetic Solutions, dated 10/10/2018, showed, .New Admits must be charted on by day 14 of admission . The review of the medical record, showed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Vitamin D Deficiency, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of the Weights and Vital Summary dated 2/5/2020, showed the following weights for Resident #46: 1/7/2020 171.1 lbs, 1/8/2020 166 lbs. 1/28/2020 164 lbs. There was no weight between 1/8/2020 and 1/28/2020. The Assistant Director of Nursing provided a weight of 160 pounds that was obtained on 2/4/2020. The facility was unable to provide an admission RD assessment for Resident #46. During an interview conducted on 2/5/2020 at 8:47 AM, the RD was asked when a dietary admission assessment should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to promote and maintain resident dignity when 1 of 23 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1) staff members stood over a resident while assisting the resident with their meal, and when 1 of 5 (LPN #2) nurses exposed a resident during insulin administration. The findings include: 1. The facility's Dignity policy with a revision date of 6/17/08 documented, .All Residents are treated in a manner and in an environment that maintains and enhances each resident's dignity and respect . 2. Observations in Resident #60's room on 4/1/19 at 11:51 AM, revealed LPN #1 standing over Resident #60 while assisting the resident with her meal. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/3/19 at 7:21 PM, in the Administrator Office, the DON was asked if it was appropriate for staff to stand over residents to assist them with meals. The DON stated, .they should be seated at eye level, face to face . 3. Medical record review revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN