No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Waters Of Clinton, LLC

220 Longmire Rd, Clinton, TN 37716 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (865) 457-6925 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (865) 457-6925 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
407 Cullom St · (865) 269-4607 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1130 N Charles G Seivers Blvd · (865) 457-1421 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.4 mi
 
Park
Jc Park In Clinton Tn · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
777 Public Safety Ln · (865) 457-2046

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.8%14.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.2%6.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms54.6%13.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.2%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.4%31.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%5.0%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.2%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.7%16.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.7%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.8%79.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission10.2%22.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.0%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.751.671.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.171.561.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.6%CMS range 39.9–65.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 7.7–18.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.7%CMS range 5.8–17.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.75
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
32.4%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 98.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-23)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2022-04-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen which had the potential to affect 90 of 90 residents of the facility.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Labeling and Dating, dated 7/30/2023, revealed .leftovers and opened foods shall be clearly labeled with date food item is to be discarded .Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Equipment Cleaning and Sanitizing revealed .Equipment is washed, rinsed, and sanitized after each use to ensure safety of food served to residents .Employees who use equipment will be responsible for washing and sanitizing removeable parts after each use. Steps include .Disassemble removable parts from equipment .wash, rinse, and sanitize all food contact surfaces and the equipment that are sanitary .During an observation and interview on 9/21/2025 at 10:30 AM, 6 sandwiches in plastic bags identified by staff as peanut butter and jelly were in the kitchen refrigerator. Continued observation revealed 5 of the 6 sandwiches were unlabeled and undated. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain consent for administration of psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Psychotropic Drugs Usage, revealed .Any resident receiving psychotropic medication will have a signed informed consent for the use of the medication .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Severe Dementia with Psychotic Disturbance and Delusional Disorder. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 scored a 7 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident received an antidepressant medication.Review of current Physician Orders for Resident #10 revealed Sertraline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the electronic medical records of the facility were protected by using safeguards to ensure the electronic medical records were not available for direct public to view within the facility. The findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, What is HIPAA, revealed .It is the health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996 (HIPAA) .A major goal of the privacy rule is to assure that individual's health information is properly protected while allowing the flow of health information needed to provide and promote high quality health care and to protect the public's health and well-being .Any and all health information on a resident or employee that identifies an individual. This can be in any form, such as paper records, electronic records, and even spoken communication .It shall be the policy of the facility to protect and safeguard the PHI (personal health information) created, acquired and maintained in accordance with the Privacy Regulation pursuant to the Health Insurance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurate for 1 resident (Resident #65) of 22 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The findings include: Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) 3.0 RAI Manual Verson 19.1, dated 10/2024, revealed .SECTION H: BLADDER AND BOWEL .The intent of the items in this section is to gather information on the use of bowel and bladder appliances .provided with individualized treatment .Appliances .INDWELLING CATHETER A catheter that is maintained within the bladder for the purpose of continuous drainage of urine .Health-related Quality of Life .It is important to know what appliances are in use and the history .Steps for Assessment .Check next to each appliance that was used at any time in the past 7 days. Select none of the above if none of the appliances .were used in the past 7 days . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #65 admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order for isolation precautions for 1 resident (Resident #12) of 16 residents reviewed for isolation orders. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control/Isolation Guidelines, undated, revealed .to prevent unprotected exposure of residents, visitors, and staff to potentially infectious microorganisms .to decrease the spread Contact precautions used for multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO's] [microorganisms, primarily bacteria, that have developed resistance to 3 or more antimicrobial drugs making them difficult to treat with standard antibiotics] .and order must be obtained from the physician .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of a Laboratory Result reported to the facility on 9/16/2025, revealed Resident #12 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored in 1 medication cart (North medication cart) of 4 medication carts reviewed.The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, dated 3/2023, revealed .Medications are stored safely, securely, and properly .accessible only to licensed nursing personnel .Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked and attended by person with authorized access . During an observation on 9/21/2025 at 1:14 PM, the North medication cart was located in the North hallway against the wall, and the drawers were facing the hallway. The medication cart was unlocked and there were no employees present. During an interview on 9/21/2025 at 1:15 PM, LPN D confirmed she had been in a resident room with the door closed and the North medication cart in the hallway was unlocked, and out of LPN D's view. LPN D also confirmed medication carts are to be locked when unattended by the licensed nurse.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was donned for 1 resident (Resident #9) of 16 residents observed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), and the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration for 1 resident (Resident #10) of 4 residents observed during medication administration.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Guidelines for Enhanced Barrier Precautions, undated, revealed .Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) is defined as the use of PPE (gowns and gloves) during high-contact resident care activities that generate opportunities for transfer of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO's] [microorganisms, primarily bacteria, that have developed resistance to 3 or more antimicrobial drugs making them difficult to treat with standard antibiotics] .onto the hands and/or clothing of the rendering caregiver .for residents at high-risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-04-26 · tag F0888 — widespread
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, review of facility policy, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure 6 COVID-19 unvaccinated staff of 6 unvaccinated staff observed, donned appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to ensure precautions were taken to properly prevent COVID-19 transmission in the facility. The findings include: Review of the CDC guidance titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, dated 2/2/2022, showed .Eye protection (i.e. [for example], goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face) . Review of the facility policy titled, Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Policy, revised 11/5/2021, showed .Unvaccinated staff will need to wear a face shield, goggles and an N95 mask at all times . Review of the facility policy titled, COVID-19 Residents and Staff Testing, revised 3/31/2022, showed .Unvaccinated staff with exemptions .If a facility staff member has an exemption .Staff are required to wear an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility documentation review, and interview the facility failed to maintain ongoing written communication between the facility and the dialysis center for 1 resident (Resident #30) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Community Hemodialysis, undated, showed .A dialysis communication sheet will return with the resident after the dialysis session to communicate to the facility information regarding the dialysis session . Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Hypertension, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of the Comprehensive Care Plan initiated on 2/11/2022, showed Resident #30 was care planned for .End Stage Renal Disease .hemodialysis . Interventions included .Written communication form with review of weight and any changes in condition between dialysis provider and living center . Review of a physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, The facility failed to develop and implement a behavioral health care plan for 1 resident (Resident #23) diagnosed with Dementia of 5 residents reviewed for Dementia and behavioral care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION PROTOCOL, showed .Residents who receive antipsychotic antidepressant sedative/hypnotic or antianxiety medications .will be reviewed routinely for effectiveness and monitored for side effects of those medications .Newly admitted residents .update the Care Plan to include the problem behavior, goals and approaches .establish behavior program and complete a Behavior/Intervention Monthly flow record for those residents identified as having behaviors. Appropriate updating and/or revisions to the Care Plan will be done .by the Interdisciplinary Care team [IDT] .The committee [IDT] will .routinely review the resident as long as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide behavioral monitoring and failed to monitor for side effects of psychotropic and anti-depressant medications for 2 residents (Resident #23 and Resident #62) of 5 residents reviewed for behavior monitoring and psychotropic medication use. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION PROTOCOL, showed .Residents who receive antipsychotic antidepressant sedative/hypnotic or antianxiety medications .will be reviewed routinely for effectiveness and monitored for side effects of those medications .Newly admitted residents .update the Care Plan to include the problem behavior, goals and approaches .establish behavior program and complete a Behavior/Intervention Monthly flow record for those residents identified as having behaviors. Appropriate updating and/or revisions to the Care Plan will be done .by the Interdisciplinary Care team [IDT]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention guidance, review of facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 3 residents (Resident #85, Resident #340, and Resident #342) of 6 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions and failed to ensure appropriate precautions were taken to prevent COVID-19 transmission in the facility. The findings include: Review of the CDC guidance titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, dated 2/2/2022, showed .Eye protection (i.e. [for example], goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face) . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, COVID-19 PPE [Personal Protective Equipment] Zones Guidelines, showed .PPE for all zones .YELLOW ZONE- SUSPECTED OR PRESUMED COVID-19 UNIT .Mask (N95 if adequate supply, may use surgical mask if not), gown,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 Resident (#61) of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis. The findings include: Review of medical record review showed Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Peripheral Vascular Disease, End Stage Renal Disease, Diabetes and Hypertension. Review of the care plan, updated 12/23/2019, showed the resident had renal failure and the potential for complications related to hemodialysis. The care plan did not address Resident #61's type of hemodialysis access or the location of the access site. Interview Assistant Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator on 2/24/2020 at 2:00 PM, stated Resident #61's care plan was to address the type of hemodialysis access and where the access site was located. The resident's care plan does not address the type of hemodialysis access or the location of the access site.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing and replace humidifier bottles for 2 residents (#60 and #72) of 8 residents reviewed for oxygen use. The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, O2, [Oxygen] undated, showed .Tubing, humidifier bottles and filters will be changed, cleaned and maintained by the facility . Review of the medical record, showed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypertension, Dementia, Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. Review of the physician's order dated 4/11/2019, revealed an order for oxygen at 3 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (device to administer oxygen through the nares of the nose). Observation of the resident's room on 2/23/2020 at 10:50 AM, showed Resident #60 was wearing oxygen at 3 LPM via nasal cannula and the tubing and water bottle for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.0+2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alpha Home - A Waters CommunityIndianapolis, IN 1 of 5Belhaven Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Continental Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Heritage Place Care & Rehabilitation LLCWinchester, TN 1 of 5Hope Creek Nursing & RehabEast Moline, IL 1 of 5Landmark Of Richton Park Rehab & Nsg CtrRichton Park, IL 1 of 5Landmark at 95th Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Hyde Park Rehabilitation and Nursing CChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Itasca Rehabilitation and Nursing CentItasca, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Lincoln Park Rehabilitation and NursinChicago, IL 1 of 5Landmark of Oak Lawn Rehabilitation and Nursing CeOak Lawn, IL 1 of 5Momence Meadows Nursing & RehabMomence, IL 1 of 5Parker Nursing & Rehab CenterStreator, IL 1 of 5The Waters Of Smyrna, LLCSmyrna, TN 1 of 5The Waters Of Springfield LLCSpringfield, TN 1 of 5Waters Of Clifty Falls, TheMadison, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Covington, TheCovington, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Dillsboro-Ross Manor, TheDillsboro, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Georgetown, TheGeorgetown, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Hobart Skilled Nursing Facility, TheHobart, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Lebanon, TheLebanon, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Martinsville, TheMartinsville, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Memphis A Rehabilitation & Nursing CtrMemphis, TN 1 of 5Waters Of Princeton, ThePrinceton, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Rockport Skilled Nursing Facility, TheRockport, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Scottsburg, TheScottsburg, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Sullivan Nursing Facility, TheSullivan, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Syracuse Skilled Nursing Facility, TheSyracuse, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Tipton Skilled Nursing Facility, TheTipton, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Wabash Skilled Nursing Facility East TheWabash, IN 1 of 5Waters Of Wakarusa Skilled Nursing Facility, TheWakarusa, IN 1 of 5Westpark A Waters CommunityIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Ambassador Nursing & Rehab CenterChicago, IL 2 of 5Midway Neurological / Rehab CenterBridgeview, IL 2 of 5The Waters Of Cheatham, LLCAshland City, TN 2 of 5The Waters Of GallatinGallatin, TN 2 of 5The Waters Of Johnson City, LLCJohnson City, TN 2 of 5Waters Of Batesville, TheBatesville, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Castleton Skilled Nursing Facility, TheIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Waters Of Dunkirk Skilled Nursing Facility, TheDunkirk, IN

Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GUBIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 09/01/2016
SELBE, JAMIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/23/2021

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$466K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 5%Other / private 32%

This home reported $466K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$297per resident / day
operating cost
$9,030per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$297per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Tennessee
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,845/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445135. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next